Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-14 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/12/2011 02:32 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
 Add: AMD Geode (586 non-PAE) can run CentOS 5 but not 6.

 Desired: Somebody who is good with repos and rpms please put the linux
 kernel (for centos 6) somewhere so


the via EPIA and the P3 mentioned earlier in this thread are all i686 
compatible, so pose no real issue for C6 to run on. However, with the 
Geode, it might be a bit more difficult.

also, i suspect its not just the kernel that needs rebuilding and 
mod'ing of patches for, you might need to rebuild much of userland as well.

- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-14 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 07/11/2011 08:37 PM, david wrote:
 I fear that the net-install image may not support USB keyboards,
 which if so, is unfortunate.


that is not true, I've done a couple of installs on machines that only 
hae usb keyboards and its been fine. Could it be a model / bios / 
firmware issue ?

- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install - USB keyboard solved

2011-07-14 Thread david
At 11:37 PM 7/13/2011, you wrote:
On 07/11/2011 08:37 PM, david wrote:
  I fear that the net-install image may not support USB keyboards,
  which if so, is unfortunate.
 

that is not true, I've done a couple of installs on machines that only
hae usb keyboards and its been fine. Could it be a model / bios /
firmware issue ?

- KB

Dear KB:

You are right-on.  It turns out that the BIOS has a setting USB 
Emulation, which if turned on, lets a USB keyboard/mouse behave like 
the PS2 version.  With this option turned on, the USB keyboard worked 
throughout the install process.  With this option turned off, the USB 
keyboard was not visible to the first net-install screen, although 
apparently some native USB drivers came into play later.

So here's one problem that has evaporated.  On to the next one.

David 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-14 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
 On 07/12/2011 02:32 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
 Add: AMD Geode (586 non-PAE) can run CentOS 5 but not 6.
 
 Desired: Somebody who is good with repos and rpms please put the
 linux kernel (for centos 6) somewhere so
 
 the via EPIA and the P3 mentioned earlier in this thread are all i686
 compatible, so pose no real issue for C6 to run on. However, with the
 Geode, it might be a bit more difficult.
 
 also, i suspect its not just the kernel that needs rebuilding and
 mod'ing of patches for, you might need to rebuild much of
 userland as well.
 
 - KB
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

-march=i586 cures many many many ills.
Rebuilding the whole damned distro takes a few zillion machine cycles.
Running the Linux Verification Suite takes another few zillion cycles.
But, once done, it's done.
It's just more spin domain knowledge than I wanted to become proficient
at.  However: if nobody else will, I must, or I must take my employers'
product/project and go elsewhere.


Insert spiffy .sig here:
Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts.
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the
moments that take our breath away. 


//me
***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this
email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
david wrote:
 COMMENT:  One of the nice properties of Linux has been that it can be 
 installed and run on old hardware.  I wonder if this feature is going away.

CentOS dev team will, in next few days release several general purpose 
CD's Like Minimal server CD and Minimal Installation CD. LiveCD should 
also be coming soon and hopefully it will have Install on HDD option 
to help you install from CD device.

CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer 
distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.

Best advice for people with CD's is please be patient and wait several 
days untill additional media is created.

Ljubomir
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread Drew
 CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
 distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.

I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
CentOS 6 onto a couple of lower end boxes, specifically a
P3-800(mobile) and an older VIA EPIA, which are fully supported in
CentOS 5.


-- 
Drew

Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood.
--Marie Curie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread fred smith
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:54:56AM -0700, Drew wrote:
  CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
  distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.
 
 I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
 CentOS 6 onto a couple of lower end boxes, specifically a
 P3-800(mobile) and an older VIA EPIA, which are fully supported in
 CentOS 5.

While I don't know aobut the VIA EPIA, any P3 is a i686 compatible
processor, and would therefore be supported.

586-class cpus include all pentiums prior to PII/Pentium-Pro, all
Intel chips older than that, AMD K5, K6, K6-II and some number of
cyrix/via chips (which ones, specifically, I do not know).

-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
  And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father,
  Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government there will be no end. He 
 will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding
  it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever.
--- Isaiah 9:7 (niv) --
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Drew wrote:
 CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
 distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.
 
 I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
 CentOS 6 onto a couple of lower end boxes, specifically a
 P3-800(mobile) and an older VIA EPIA, which are fully supported in
 CentOS 5.
 
 
Generally, when you develop any app, you add more and more features and 
you need more powerful hardware to run at the same speed.

Fedora 12-15 for example need more space on boot partition (500MB is I 
am not mistaken) and CentOS5/Fedora6 only needed 100MB.

I am sure other optimizations were made in kernel and in other packages 
in order to exploit all features of modern hardware. And since Linux 
distro's are developed by vast number of developers mostly like newest 
and greatest, it is logical to expect bloated code. When you add to the 
mix the fact that most of the developers is more focused on adding new 
features (that need more power to be done) then on fixing bug (a long 
time problem for Fedora, Ubuntu, all distros using bleeding edge 
software) then optimizing the code so it can run on older hardware is 
not likely to happen.

Packages in RHEL 5.0(x) were designed to run optimally on hardware from 
4-5 years. Similarly, RHEL 6 packages are reflection of the today 
software and I don't expect any optimizations for older hardware.

That being said, I never said it will not run on older hardware, just 
that they (most developers of most packages) don't care that much about 
older hardware, and my reply was aimed at gradual disappearance of CD 
medium from more and more distro's. Reply could be take DVD drive from 
somewhere and hook it up instead of CD drive, then return it when you 
finish.

Ljubomir
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 08:54:56 AM Drew wrote:
  CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
  distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.
 
 I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
 CentOS 6 onto a couple of lower end boxes, specifically a
 P3-800(mobile) and an older VIA EPIA, which are fully supported in
 CentOS 5.

EL6 of any flavor needs more horsepower than EL5 of any flavor.  Read the 
installation minimum requirements, both from the centos.org site and the 
redhat.com site.  PAE is required, for instance. 392MB of RAM is the minimum to 
install, for another.

EL5 will be supported for a while yet, and it may be the best choice for your 
needs.

I have a few older boxes, too (some *much* older than a PPro, even) and it's 
just going to be a simple fact that EL6 is just not going to run there.

There are lighter linuxes out there that are still up to date; Alpine, for 
instance, as well as TinyCore.  I quote those because they both seem to be 
recently updated and both seem to have reasonably modern packages available; 
and neither require a lot of horsepower for the base system.

Some Linux variants still work fine with older stuff; upstream has decided that 
EL6 is not one of them.  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:54:56AM -0700, Drew wrote:
 CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the
 newer distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586
 CPU's. 
 
 I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
 CentOS 6 onto a couple of lower end boxes, specifically a
 P3-800(mobile) and an older VIA EPIA, which are fully supported in
 CentOS 5.
 
 While I don't know aobut the VIA EPIA, any P3 is a i686 compatible
 processor, and would therefore be supported.
 
 586-class cpus include all pentiums prior to PII/Pentium-Pro, all
 Intel chips older than that, AMD K5, K6, K6-II and some number of
 cyrix/via chips (which ones, specifically, I do not know).
Add: AMD Geode (586 non-PAE) can run CentOS 5 but not 6.

Desired: Somebody who is good with repos and rpms please put the linux
kernel (for centos 6) somewhere so

Yum --enablerepo=somewhere install full-kernel-source

will put the kernel source on our machines so we abandoned children
can at least feed ourselves.
We can hack the kernel until we all can run CentOS 6 on our wind-up-key
embedded/headless/whatever minimachines.


Insert spiffy .sig here:
Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts.
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the
moments that take our breath away. 


//me
***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this
email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread Samuel Torralba
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:37 AM, david da...@daku.org wrote:

 Folks

 I tried the net-install, because my computer has no DVD, only a CD.
 The system has a USB connected keyboard, and it works just fine
 accessing the built-in BIOS.

 However, when I booted the netinstall CD, the initial screen which
 asks for the type of installation did not respond to the keyboard.  I
 was therefore forced to wait the 30-seconds for the timeout, at which
 point the install screen showed up and the keyboard worked.

 I fear that the net-install image may not support USB keyboards,
 which if so, is unfortunate.

 The alternate of burning multiple CDs (as I've done with earlier
 versions) appears unavailable in CENTOS 6.

 Furthermore, I was never given the choice of using a GUI or text
 install; I guess the old display device isn't supported in the
 install system.  Not being given any choices of packages during the
 install (a fact noted in the release notes) resulted, however, a
 system where a lot of the expected utility programs weren't there.:
   a)  yum worked
   b)  No SSH client appeared to exist, nor did YUM know about it.
   c)  Several useful utilities were not there, so they had to be
 installed via yum.


you need  652MB of ram for the GUI install:
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0#head-710e17fe8ed8c98a1fe4faee4e11e2135df09fff


 As a result, the process of bringing this system to a usable state
 consisted of:
   1)  Burn net-install CD
   2)  Answer the few questions.
   3)  For the net-install site, use
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.0/os/i386
   4)  When it boots, use yum:
   yum install ftp perl unzip
   5)





 COMMENT:  One of the nice properties of Linux has been that it can be
 installed and run on old hardware.  I wonder if this feature is going
 away.

 David

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:

 Fedora 12-15 for example need more space on boot partition (500MB is I
 am not mistaken) and CentOS5/Fedora6 only needed 100MB.

F12-F15 need a larger /boot for the preupgrade tool (to upgrade
from one version to the next) to run properly.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Tom H wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
 Fedora 12-15 for example need more space on boot partition (500MB is I
 am not mistaken) and CentOS5/Fedora6 only needed 100MB.
 
 F12-F15 need a larger /boot for the preupgrade tool (to upgrade
 from one version to the next) to run properly.

Ahhh, excellent then, I was thinking of repartitioning my drives (still 
had no time to read Release Notes, pending).

Ljubomir
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread m . roth
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
 Drew wrote:
 CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
 distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.

 I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
 CentOS 6 onto a couple of lower end boxes, specifically a
 P3-800(mobile) and an older VIA EPIA, which are fully supported in
 CentOS 5.

 Generally, when you develop any app, you add more and more features and
 you need more powerful hardware to run at the same speed.

And then there's the nothing-but-eye-candy, and the we'll just change
something, because that look is *so* last year (like the assinine M$
ribbon replacing menu bars).

 Fedora 12-15 for example need more space on boot partition (500MB is I
 am not mistaken) and CentOS5/Fedora6 only needed 100MB.

250M works.
snip
mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread John Hinton
On 7/12/2011 9:31 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
 That being said, I never said it will not run on older hardware, just 
 that they (most developers of most packages) don't care that much 
 about older hardware, and my reply was aimed at gradual disappearance 
 of CD medium from more and more distro's. Reply could be take DVD 
 drive from somewhere and hook it up instead of CD drive, then return 
 it when you finish. Ljubomir 
 ___ CentOS mailing list 
 CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos 

I suppose the Proliant users could be mad at HP for being old school 
with only CD-Roms in even their G4 servers. (and no, these 2U servers 
can't hold a standard DVD drive as the space if very low profile) But 
I'm rarely mad at the Proliant line of servers. I suppose as these are 
'servers', they don't really need any DVD drive, except to answer to the 
packaging of OS softwares (and they normally go with 'known good 
hardware' over new stuff). I wouldn't consider G4s old and slow... 8 
gigs of ram and a dual 3.6g xeon processors isn't all that slow or 
shabby. For a webserver, it is downright spunky! And, as PHP is so dead 
in 5, we must move on to 6. I will find a way to install this on these 
Proliants, but shame on Redhat for not doing CDs. Kudos to CentOS for 
helping our community with an upcoming CD solutions! In the meantime, 
I'll get around to experimenting and report any successes here.

-- 
John Hinton
877-777-1407 ext 502
http://www.ew3d.com
Comprehensive Online Solutions

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread Les Mikesell
On 7/12/2011 11:13 AM, John Hinton wrote:
 I will find a way to install this on these
 Proliants, but shame on Redhat for not doing CDs.

Unless it is your first linux install at a location, NFS should be the 
easy route.  It was always easier than burning/juggling the whole CD set 
even when they did make the isos because the installer knows how to 
handle the iso image(s) directly.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread R - elists
john

you can inexpensively purchase proper slim dvd drives for proliant servers

we have done so for G3. G4 is essentially same

 - rh

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problem with net-install

2011-07-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 07/12/11 9:13 AM, John Hinton wrote:
 I wouldn't consider G4s old and slow... 8
 gigs of ram and a dual 3.6g xeon processors isn't all that slow or
 shabby.

except today's model is 48GB of ram[1] and dual 6 core 3Ghz CPUs, each 
core of which is significantly faster than those P4/Netburst xeon.   
With virtualization, one of these servers can likely support 8 or more 
VMs each with the performance of your G4s



[1] the config I just ordered, 48GB uses half the ram slots, so I can 
easily double that to 96GB by adding 6 more 8GB dimms

-- 
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos