RE: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-09 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Napierala
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 4:59 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?
>
> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 18:31:18 Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > I'm not sure an appliance is the solution here as the user
> said it is
> > the only server, so where is his account information going
> to reside?
> >
> > Most appliances don't provide user account management only
> integration.
> >
> > -Ross
>
> Openfiler uses internal LDAP server to manage group/user permissions.

I did not know that, good to know. Does it by chance also act as a Kerberos
key distribution center?

-Ross

__
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-09 Thread Tomasz Napierała
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 18:31:18 Ross S. W. Walker wrote:

[snip]
> I'm not sure an appliance is the solution here as the user said it is
> the only server, so where is his account information going to reside?
>
> Most appliances don't provide user account management only integration.
>
> -Ross

Openfiler uses internal LDAP server to manage group/user permissions.

-- 
Tomasz Napierala
System Administrator
Allegro Team
http://www.allegro.pl/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Les Mikesell

Ross S. W. Walker wrote:

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell

Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:28 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

Ralph Angenendt wrote:

Tomasz Napierała wrote:
It is perfectly possible on CentOS, but I would suggest 
dedicated distro like 

Openfiler (loosly based on CentOS)

Errm, no. It isn't.

Or SMEserver, which is: http://www.contribs.org. If you have 
to ask this 
question, I'd suggest at least looking at SMEserver.  If it does what 
you want it is probably the easiest system to install and manage (all 
simple web forms).  I'm not sure if it's group concepts will do quite 
what you want, though.  You might have to give dept managers 
full admin 
access or do certain operations for them.


I'm not sure an appliance is the solution here as the user said it is
the only server, so where is his account information going to reside?

Most appliances don't provide user account management only integration.


SMEserver includes web forms to set up accounts and can act as a windows 
domain controller.  It also provides web, ftp, and email/webmail 
services and it combines the 'group' concepts for unix permission groups 
with email groups to simply things.   The down side is simply that if it 
doesn't already do what you want (or have a contributed module) it is 
much harder to customize that a stock centos - but it does most of what 
you'd want as a windows server out of the box - and includes some 
options for backups.


--
  Les Mikesell
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:28 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?
> 
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> >> It is perfectly possible on CentOS, but I would suggest 
> dedicated distro like 
> >> Openfiler (loosly based on CentOS)
> > 
> > Errm, no. It isn't.
> > 
> 
> Or SMEserver, which is: http://www.contribs.org. If you have 
> to ask this 
> question, I'd suggest at least looking at SMEserver.  If it does what 
> you want it is probably the easiest system to install and manage (all 
> simple web forms).  I'm not sure if it's group concepts will do quite 
> what you want, though.  You might have to give dept managers 
> full admin 
> access or do certain operations for them.

I'm not sure an appliance is the solution here as the user said it is
the only server, so where is his account information going to reside?

Most appliances don't provide user account management only integration.

-Ross

__
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Les Mikesell

Ralph Angenendt wrote:

Tomasz Napierała wrote:
It is perfectly possible on CentOS, but I would suggest dedicated distro like 
Openfiler (loosly based on CentOS)


Errm, no. It isn't.



Or SMEserver, which is: http://www.contribs.org. If you have to ask this 
question, I'd suggest at least looking at SMEserver.  If it does what 
you want it is probably the easiest system to install and manage (all 
simple web forms).  I'm not sure if it's group concepts will do quite 
what you want, though.  You might have to give dept managers full admin 
access or do certain operations for them.


--
  Les Mikesell
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Leventhal
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:08 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?
> 
> 
> >
> > You will need a backup solution too, don't forget have a 
> backup strategy from the
> > start!
> >
> > -Ross
> >
> >   
> Amen to that, Ross.  I've used a few, but have found that the paid
> solution from Arkeia[1] is pretty damned solid and easy to use.

I've heard good things about BitLeap http://www.bitleap.com/

I have a friend who runs ops at a not-for-profit swear by it.

-Ross

__
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Ray Leventhal

>
> You will need a backup solution too, don't forget have a backup strategy from 
> the
> start!
>
> -Ross
>
>   
Amen to that, Ross.  I've used a few, but have found that the paid
solution from Arkeia[1] is pretty damned solid and easy to use.

HTH,
~Ray

[1] http://www.arkeia.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Sedlacek
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 5:18 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?
> 
> I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers & 
> Exchange systems.
> 
> I have 5+ years UNIX mid-level experience but not in centOS. 
> Grounded in SCO UNIX (the real SCO UNIX).
> 
> We want to use CentOS on a recently grave yarded Dell 
> poweredge 400SC server.
> 
> This is a P4 3.0 Ghz, w/4GB memory, 2 SATA 250 GB disks.
> 
> We want to use this server w/CentOS5, to provide file and 
> print resources to 100 users.
> 
> Each Department wants control over common folders of info for 
> only their group.
> 
> Each user wants control over their folders.
> 
> Pretty much standard permissions for departments.
> 
> Is this do-able with the server and centOS5 and 100 users?
> 
> Thank you in advance.

Well, it's not the most ideal setup, but if you are determined
to stick with it, here's how I would configure the hard disks:

part raid.1 --size=128 --ondisk=sda
part raid.2 --size=128 --ondisk=sdb
part raid.3 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sda
part raid.4 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sdb

raid /boot --fstype ext3 --level=RAID1 --device=md0 raid.1 raid.2
raid pv.1 --fstype "physical volume (LVM)" --level=RAID1 --device=md1 raid.3 
raid.4

volgroup CentOS --noformat --pesize=32768 pv.1

logvol / --fstype ext3 --name=root --vgname=CentOS --size=8192
logvol swap --fstype swap --name=swap --vgname=CentOS --size=4096
logvol /var/spool --fstype ext3 --name=spool --vgname=CentOS --size=16384
logvol /home --fstype ext3 --name=home --vgname=CentOS --size=51200
logvol /shared --fstype ext3 --name=shared --vgname=CentOS --size=51200

This will start you off with a 50GB /home for user's home directories and 50GB 
/shared
for shared files, but since it's using LVM you can extend either as the need 
occurs
and then extend the underlying file system. It will also allow you to attach a 
storage
enclosure in the future, add the RAID LD to the CentOS VG, pvmove the data over 
to it
and then vgsplit the LD off into it's own VG. I would avoid doing snapshots 
until you
get an external enclosure with a separate LD for handling just snapshots.

You can then create sub folders under /shared for each department.

I would probably start by using LDAP for users and groups and Kerberos for 
passwords
even if it is a single server. It might take a little bit longer to get going, 
but it
will ensure that any new server added can immediately join-up and you will not 
need
to re-map all uid/gid permissions because they weren't setup appropriately to 
begin
with.

Use UID/GIDs that are significantly higher then the defaults, leave the 
defaults for
local user accounts and assign the network UIDs and GIDs starting at like 
1-9
if you decide to migrate to Windows AD you can then map to the RIDs using 
winbind
starting at 10-99.

You will need a backup solution too, don't forget have a backup strategy from 
the
start!

-Ross

__
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Daniel de Kok
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 05:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I forgot to post docs for acl on centos5:
> 
> http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/ch-acls.html

Let me shamelessly plug some more ACL documentation ;):
http://kajero.com/books/unixsystems/html/chap-filesystem.html#chap-filesystem-permissions-acl

-- Daniel

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Johnny Hughes
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Ken Sedlacek wrote:
>> I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers & Exchange systems.
>>
>> I have 5+ years UNIX mid-level experience but not in centOS. Grounded in SCO 
>> UNIX (the real SCO UNIX).
>>
>> We want to use CentOS on a recently grave yarded Dell poweredge 400SC server.
>>
>> This is a P4 3.0 Ghz, w/4GB memory, 2 SATA 250 GB disks.
>>
>> We want to use this server w/CentOS5, to provide file and print resources to 
>> 100 users.
>>
>> Each Department wants control over common folders of info for only their 
>> group.
>>
>> Each user wants control over their folders.
>>
>> Pretty much standard permissions for departments.
>>
>> Is this do-able with the server and centOS5 and 100 users?
> 
> You can certainly do this with CentOS-5.
> 
> You will want to install samba and join the server to your Active
> Directory domain ... here is a guide that works:
> 
> http://www.howtoforge.com/samba_ads_security_mode
> 
> (skip the part that has you download new samba RPMS from samba.org ...
> the centOS 5 RPMS work OK for ADS ... you will want to use winbind)
> 
> You will most likely want to make sure that you have ACL support for
> CentOS-5 and you will want to edit the /etc/fstab and change your shared
> folder to have ACL support.  Here is an article on ACLs for centos:
> 
> http://techxworld.com/community/blogs/features/archive/2007/05/21/acls-on-samba.aspx
> 
> To do this, you should ensure that you have created a separate
> partition/mount for the file shares.  I usually do this in /home/samba/
> for public shared items  and /home// for the users home
> directories ... and I usually have home as a separate mount ... like this:
> 
> /dev/sda4 /home ext3 defaults,acl 0 0
> 
> You will need to be able to use the getfacl and setfacl commands to
> setup initial permissions.

I forgot to post docs for acl on centos5:

http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/ch-acls.html





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Johnny Hughes
Ken Sedlacek wrote:
> I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers & Exchange systems.
> 
> I have 5+ years UNIX mid-level experience but not in centOS. Grounded in SCO 
> UNIX (the real SCO UNIX).
> 
> We want to use CentOS on a recently grave yarded Dell poweredge 400SC server.
> 
> This is a P4 3.0 Ghz, w/4GB memory, 2 SATA 250 GB disks.
> 
> We want to use this server w/CentOS5, to provide file and print resources to 
> 100 users.
> 
> Each Department wants control over common folders of info for only their 
> group.
> 
> Each user wants control over their folders.
> 
> Pretty much standard permissions for departments.
> 
> Is this do-able with the server and centOS5 and 100 users?

You can certainly do this with CentOS-5.

You will want to install samba and join the server to your Active
Directory domain ... here is a guide that works:

http://www.howtoforge.com/samba_ads_security_mode

(skip the part that has you download new samba RPMS from samba.org ...
the centOS 5 RPMS work OK for ADS ... you will want to use winbind)

You will most likely want to make sure that you have ACL support for
CentOS-5 and you will want to edit the /etc/fstab and change your shared
folder to have ACL support.  Here is an article on ACLs for centos:

http://techxworld.com/community/blogs/features/archive/2007/05/21/acls-on-samba.aspx

To do this, you should ensure that you have created a separate
partition/mount for the file shares.  I usually do this in /home/samba/
for public shared items  and /home// for the users home
directories ... and I usually have home as a separate mount ... like this:

/dev/sda4 /home ext3 defaults,acl 0 0

You will need to be able to use the getfacl and setfacl commands to
setup initial permissions.





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Tomasz Napierała
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 11:55:45 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> > It is perfectly possible on CentOS, but I would suggest dedicated distro
> > like Openfiler (loosly based on CentOS)
>
> Errm, no. It isn't.

You're right, it was, but not anymore. I had an impression that rPath is based 
on CentOS, but I can't find any information to prove that ;)

Regards,
-- 
Tomasz Napierala
System Administrator
Allegro Team
http://www.allegro.pl/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> It is perfectly possible on CentOS, but I would suggest dedicated distro like 
> Openfiler (loosly based on CentOS)

Errm, no. It isn't.

Ralph


pgphAnbNuPAMU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-08 Thread Tomasz Napierała
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 23:17:31 Ken Sedlacek wrote:
> I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers & Exchange systems.
>
> I have 5+ years UNIX mid-level experience but not in centOS. Grounded in
> SCO UNIX (the real SCO UNIX).
>
> We want to use CentOS on a recently grave yarded Dell poweredge 400SC
> server.
>
> This is a P4 3.0 Ghz, w/4GB memory, 2 SATA 250 GB disks.
>
> We want to use this server w/CentOS5, to provide file and print resources
> to 100 users.
>
> Each Department wants control over common folders of info for only their
> group.
>
> Each user wants control over their folders.
>
> Pretty much standard permissions for departments.
>
> Is this do-able with the server and centOS5 and 100 users?
>

It is perfectly possible on CentOS, but I would suggest dedicated distro like 
Openfiler (loosly based on CentOS)

Regards,
-- 
Tomasz Napierala
System Administrator
Allegro Team
http://www.allegro.pl/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-07 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Sedlacek
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 5:18 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?
> 
> I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers & 
> Exchange systems.
> 
> I have 5+ years UNIX mid-level experience but not in centOS. 
> Grounded in SCO UNIX (the real SCO UNIX).
> 
> We want to use CentOS on a recently grave yarded Dell 
> poweredge 400SC server.
> 
> This is a P4 3.0 Ghz, w/4GB memory, 2 SATA 250 GB disks.
> 
> We want to use this server w/CentOS5, to provide file and 
> print resources to 100 users.
> 
> Each Department wants control over common folders of info for 
> only their group.
> 
> Each user wants control over their folders.
> 
> Pretty much standard permissions for departments.
> 
> Is this do-able with the server and centOS5 and 100 users?

Sure you can, my only question is why?

I just bought a Dell Poweredge 860 1u unit with a Quad 2.4GHz
Xeon processor 2x4MB L2 cache and 4GB of memory for $1700.

Granted it only has 2 84GB internal SATA drives, but it is
ready to hook up to a storage enclosure, which could be a
MD1000 which has 15 drive bays driven by a PERC 5e controller.

Now of course the external enclosure will cost some $$ but it
will provide for growing performance and capacity needs and
you can always swap out the 860 for a higher end machine
down the line without having to backup/restore your data
volumes.

A 400SC might make a good print server, but it will struggle
as a good file server, especially as users start to want
things like volume snapshots and replication, etc.

Start with a lightly populated MD1000, say 4 SATA drives in
RAID5 or RAID10 and 2 SATA drives mirrored for snapshots.

-Ross

__
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?

2007-08-07 Thread Ken Sedlacek
I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers & Exchange systems.

I have 5+ years UNIX mid-level experience but not in centOS. Grounded in SCO 
UNIX (the real SCO UNIX).

We want to use CentOS on a recently grave yarded Dell poweredge 400SC server.

This is a P4 3.0 Ghz, w/4GB memory, 2 SATA 250 GB disks.

We want to use this server w/CentOS5, to provide file and print resources to 
100 users.

Each Department wants control over common folders of info for only their group.

Each user wants control over their folders.

Pretty much standard permissions for departments.

Is this do-able with the server and centOS5 and 100 users?

Thank you in advance.

Ken
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos