Re: [CentOS] slow i/o with a raid 50 on a 3ware controller

2014-08-13 Thread Steven Tardy
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Chuck Campbell campb...@accelinc.com
wrote:

 I have a raid 50 array on a 3ware controller. The box is running centos
 6.5 and
 the file system is ext4.

 I'm going to try some other filesystems, but could anyone suggest any
 alternative raid setups as well as stripe sizes I should try?

 The old server uses the same controller on a centos 5.10 setup, using
 ext3, and
 it performs much faster i/o. The old 3ware setup is raid 5.

 -chuck


tuned-adm list
tuned-adm profile throughput-performance
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] slow i/o with a raid 50 on a 3ware controller

2014-08-09 Thread Markus Falb
On 7.8.2014 03:04, John R Pierce wrote:
 On 8/6/2014 5:32 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
 Do you have barriers enabled?
 Just another shot in the dark, but 5 didn't have that.
 If you have battery backed Cache with your Controller, you can safely
 disable barriers anyway.
 are you sure about this?  thats not my understanding.
 
 What I've been told is, the battery backed write cache just lets you 
 enable writeback caching in the raid controller, write barriers at the 
 various OS layers still have to be respected, as they ensure certain 
 writes are completed in order.

You mean there are other places besides the drive itself where I/O may
be reordered? The I/O Scheduler maybe? Hmmm...

-- 
Kind Regards, Markus Falb

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] slow i/o with a raid 50 on a 3ware controller

2014-08-06 Thread Chuck Campbell
I have a raid 50 array on a 3ware controller. The box is running centos 6.5 and 
the file system is ext4.

I'm going to try some other filesystems, but could anyone suggest any 
alternative raid setups as well as stripe sizes I should try?

The old server uses the same controller on a centos 5.10 setup, using ext3, and 
it performs much faster i/o. The old 3ware setup is raid 5.

-chuck

-- 
ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics |  (713)993-0671 ph.
 |   and Integrated Interpretation   |  (713)993-0608 fax
448 W. 19th St. #325|Since 1992 |  (713)306-5794 cell
  Houston, TX, 77008 |  Chuck Campbell   | campb...@accelinc.com
 |  President  Senior Geoscientist  |

  Integration means more than having all the maps at the same scale!

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] slow i/o with a raid 50 on a 3ware controller

2014-08-06 Thread Valeri Galtsev
Check if writing cache is enabled in 3ware controller configuration. You
may want to have battery backup of controller RAM for that (otherwise
sudden power loss will lead to loss of cache which will make a disaster on
RAID level). 3ware controllers resist to enable cache in absence of
battery backup or weak battery or similar.

Just a shot in a dark.

Valeri

On Wed, August 6, 2014 1:44 pm, Chuck Campbell wrote:
 I have a raid 50 array on a 3ware controller. The box is running centos
 6.5 and
 the file system is ext4.

 I'm going to try some other filesystems, but could anyone suggest any
 alternative raid setups as well as stripe sizes I should try?

 The old server uses the same controller on a centos 5.10 setup, using
 ext3, and
 it performs much faster i/o. The old 3ware setup is raid 5.

 -chuck

 --
 ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics |  (713)993-0671
 ph.
  |   and Integrated Interpretation   |  (713)993-0608
 fax
 448 W. 19th St. #325|Since 1992 |  (713)306-5794
 cell
   Houston, TX, 77008 |  Chuck Campbell   |
 campb...@accelinc.com
  |  President  Senior Geoscientist  |

   Integration means more than having all the maps at the same scale!

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] slow i/o with a raid 50 on a 3ware controller

2014-08-06 Thread Markus Falb
On 6.8.2014 20:44, Chuck Campbell wrote:
 I have a raid 50 array on a 3ware controller. The box is running centos 6.5 
 and 
 the file system is ext4.
 
 I'm going to try some other filesystems, but could anyone suggest any 
 alternative raid setups as well as stripe sizes I should try?
 
 The old server uses the same controller on a centos 5.10 setup, using ext3, 
 and 
 it performs much faster i/o. The old 3ware setup is raid 5.

Do you have barriers enabled?
Just another shot in the dark, but 5 didn't have that.
If you have battery backed Cache with your Controller, you can safely
disable barriers anyway.

-- 
Kind Regards, Markus Falb

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] slow i/o with a raid 50 on a 3ware controller

2014-08-06 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/6/2014 5:32 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
 Do you have barriers enabled?
 Just another shot in the dark, but 5 didn't have that.
 If you have battery backed Cache with your Controller, you can safely
 disable barriers anyway.
are you sure about this?  thats not my understanding.

What I've been told is, the battery backed write cache just lets you 
enable writeback caching in the raid controller, write barriers at the 
various OS layers still have to be respected, as they ensure certain 
writes are completed in order.



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos