RE: [CentOS] Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Scott Silva wrote: on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: Florin Andrei wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: jfs is supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a mail/news server Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't plan a long-term deployment around it... And Hans Reiser's legal woes are deeper than ever. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/2243232from=rss http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930857-7.html But here in California a man can spend most of his life in appeals. Even though the technology would still be around even if Hans isn't, there has been a lot of pain trying to get reiserfs to continue to work well in the kernel tree from release to release. It's very tempermental, so I don't know if it will last much longer, especially given the slew of existing file systems that don't need such work to maintain. ext4 is being previewed in Fedora 9 this month, so add one more to the list. I heard the Reiser FS is going to be replaced with the Peterson FS ;-) -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Scott Silva wrote: on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: Florin Andrei wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: jfs is supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a mail/news server Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't plan a long-term deployment around it... And Hans Reiser's legal woes are deeper than ever. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/2243232from=rss http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930857-7.html But here in California a man can spend most of his life in appeals. Even though the technology would still be around even if Hans isn't, there has been a lot of pain trying to get reiserfs to continue to work well in the kernel tree from release to release. It's very tempermental, so I don't know if it will last much longer, especially given the slew of existing file systems that don't need such work to maintain. Well I wanted the facts about ReiserFS in the kernel and so I poked and googled some more and the part about the maintenance of reiserfs in the kernel was unfounded hearsay. The real reason it is being phased out in distributions (not the kernel tree) is the questions surrounding it's long term survival without Hans and Namesys to provide support for it. ext4 is being previewed in Fedora 9 this month, so add one more to the list. I heard the Reiser FS is going to be replaced with the Peterson FS ;-) There is a punch line in there somewhere, but my mind just isn't that sharp today. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
Scott Silva wrote: on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: Florin Andrei wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: jfs is supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a mail/news server Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit. Yeah, but reiserfs is all but dead these days. At least I wouldn't plan a long-term deployment around it... And Hans Reiser's legal woes are deeper than ever. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/28/2243232from=rss http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930857-7.html But here in California a man can spend most of his life in appeals. I finally read the news.com article and all I have to say is, what an idiot. Just goes to show you that being intelligent doesn't necessarily make you smart. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
