Re: [CentOS] 7.7.1908, interface bonding, and default route

2019-09-20 Thread Carlos A. Carnero Delgado
El vie., 20 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 10:03, Alexander Dalloz (
ad+li...@uni-x.org) escribió:

> If you don't want to use NetworkManager, then define NM_CONTROLLED="no"
>

And *that* was the answer! Everything is working as expected now.

Thank you!
Carlos.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 7.7.1908, interface bonding, and default route

2019-09-20 Thread Alexander Dalloz

Am 2019-09-20 15:31, schrieb Carlos A. Carnero Delgado:
El vie., 20 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 06:16, Giles Coochey 
(gi...@coochey.net)

escribió:


I have a similar set up to you, and just did the upgrade to 1908, I
didn't experience the problem you had, I can't see anything out of the
ordinary in your network files.



I have reviewed the configuration several times now, and still can't 
see if
there's anything wrong with it. What I found is that, after the system 
has

booted up, if I systemctl restart network the default route does gets
applied.

Thanks a lot for your input!


If you don't want to use NetworkManager, then define NM_CONTROLLED="no"

In case you are using NetworkManager, then follow the RHEL guide to 
setup your bond using nmcli: 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/networking_guide/sec-network_bonding_using_the_networkmanager_command_line_tool_nmcli


Alexander
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 7.7.1908, interface bonding, and default route

2019-09-20 Thread Carlos A. Carnero Delgado
El vie., 20 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 06:16, Giles Coochey (gi...@coochey.net)
escribió:

> I have a similar set up to you, and just did the upgrade to 1908, I
> didn't experience the problem you had, I can't see anything out of the
> ordinary in your network files.
>

I have reviewed the configuration several times now, and still can't see if
there's anything wrong with it. What I found is that, after the system has
booted up, if I systemctl restart network the default route does gets
applied.

Thanks a lot for your input!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 7.7.1908, interface bonding, and default route

2019-09-20 Thread Giles Coochey

On 20/09/2019 04:55, Carlos A. Carnero Delgado wrote:

Hi!

I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being
set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the
corresponding configuration for the master is (
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0):

   TYPE=Bond
   BOOTPROTO=none
   DEFROUTE=yes
   IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes
   NAME=bond0
   DEVICE=bond0
   ONBOOT=yes
   IPADDR=10.3.20.131
   PREFIX=24
   GATEWAY=10.3.20.1
   DNS1=10.3.2.8
   BONDING_MASTER=yes
   BONDING_OPTS="mode=802.3ad xmit_hash_policy=layer2 miimon=100"

The slaves (two of them) are configured like

   TYPE=Ethernet
   BOOTPROTO=none
   NAME=bond0-slave0
   DEVICE=em3
   ONBOOT=yes
   MASTER=bond0
   SLAVE=yes

After booting, the routing table is

   10.3.20.0/24 dev bond0 proto kernel scope link src 10.3.20.131 metric 300

with no default route configured (manually adding it will work, of course.)

This machine worked perfectly before, and it did during previous upgrades
and reboots. Has anyone ever had this problem before?

I have a similar set up to you, and just did the upgrade to 1908, I 
didn't experience the problem you had, I can't see anything out of the 
ordinary in your network files.


I originally set up my bond using nmtui

Here is my configuration:

#Bond:

BONDING_OPTS="ad_select=stable all_slaves_active=0 arp_all_targets=any 
downdelay=0 fail_over_mac=none lp_interval=1 miimon=100 min_links=0 
mode=802.3ad num_grat_arp=1 num_unsol_na=1 primary_reselect=always 
resend_igmp=1 updelay=0 use_carrier=1 xmit_hash_policy=layer2"

TYPE=Bond
BONDING_MASTER=yes
PROXY_METHOD=none
BROWSER_ONLY=no
BOOTPROTO=none
IPADDR=a.b.c.249
PREFIX=24
GATEWAY=a.b.c.1
DNS1=a.b.d.253
DNS2=a.b.d.4
DNS3=a.b.d.12
DOMAIN=redacted.net
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
IPV6INIT=yes
NAME="Bond connection 1"
UUID=4ccacb42-dfad-484f-8168-b78c70a66c8d
DEVICE=nm-bond
ONBOOT=yes
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy

#Channel Interface example

TYPE=Ethernet
NAME="Ethernet connection 1"
UUID=5a961074-d502-49a3-ae3b-b6850a990e86
DEVICE=enp7s0f0
ONBOOT=yes
MASTER=nm-bond
SLAVE=yes
MASTER_UUID=4ccacb42-dfad-484f-8168-b78c70a66c8d


Thanks,
Carlos.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


--
Giles Coochey

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos