Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: how about yum.log ? if you dont mind attaching that, I think there is enough info for a bugreport on bugs.centos.org The yum.logs don't show anything about memory issues. Maybe I only assumed it was a memory issue and quit out of the update process before it was done needlessly. When I updated my brother's computer, there was some of the same behavior (at least it appeared to be the same) and I think it had something to do with shutting down the VirtualBox kernel. I just let it go in that case and everything updated fine. I've just updated my laptop without any issues (no VirtualBox on this computer). I guess what I'm saying is that I think the only software problem was the software between the computer screen and the chair. Sorry for bringing it up -- next time I'll document any problems -- real or imagined. And thanks again for your great work on CentOS. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.5 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
Thanks! ssh jzhome 'cat /etc/issue' CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Kernel \r on an \m ^_^ -- John Maclean MSc. (DIC) BSc. (Hons) Linux Systems and Applications 07739 171 531 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On 05/16/2010 09:27 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: The issue came up *after* I had downloaded all the update files. My used space was 99%, approximately 230 Megs were shown available at /. There was no memory available in my tmpfs directory/partition. ... If you think that I have enough information to file a bug report I'll go ahead and do that how about yum.log ? if you dont mind attaching that, I think there is enough info for a bugreport on bugs.centos.org - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On 05/15/2010 08:05 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: My desktop updated without a hitch... well, actually, I ran out of disk space after the download completed, so had to clear some space, yum tries to do some space required estimates before starting the process, so its clearly got that wrong in your case here. Would you mind filing a bugreport at bugs.centos.org about this issue ? and also add details like a 'df -h' and exactly how much yum got things wrong by. thanks - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: On 05/15/2010 08:05 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote: My desktop updated without a hitch... well, actually, I ran out of disk space after the download completed, so had to clear some space, yum tries to do some space required estimates before starting the process, so its clearly got that wrong in your case here. Would you mind filing a bugreport at bugs.centos.org about this issue ? and also add details like a 'df -h' and exactly how much yum got things wrong by. thanks I can give a current 'df -h' but, unfortunately, I didn't write down any specifics while updating. Here's what I currently have. [r...@localhost ~]$ df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 35G 30G 3.4G 90% / /dev/hda1 97M 37M 56M 40% /boot tmpfs502M 0 502M 0% /dev/shm The issue came up *after* I had downloaded all the update files. My used space was 99%, approximately 230 Megs were shown available at /. There was no memory available in my tmpfs directory/partition. I believe yum kicked me out of the update process. There were a lot of messages without line breaks -- filled up the screen. When I cleared about 3 Gigs of memory and re-ran 'yum update' it started back up where I left off and finished the updated without issue.. If you think that I have enough information to file a bug report I'll go ahead and do that. Thanks again. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.5 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On 05/15/2010 05:05 PM, Ned Slider informed us: Robert wrote: snip Only disappointment so far is that lm_sensors still doesn't grok the AMD K-10 thermal sensors - a situation I grumble about even as I file it in the beggars can't be choosers folder. That's because your kernel does not have a k10temp driver - it was only introduced into the mainline kernel around 2.6.32. There is a backported driver in ELRepo: http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-k10temp yum install kmod-k10temp Red Hat did do a huge backport refresh of the /hwmon tree in el5.5, but they pulled from around kernel-2.6.26 which was before k10temp made it into the mainline kernel. Hope that helps. Indeed! Many thanks. It hasn't helped yet but it will as soon as I get the yum-priorities straight. I'm pretty skiddish -- if not downright paranoid -- about repo mixing and I'm using all due caution before allowing yum to replace my existing lm_sensors-2.10.7-9.el5.i386 with the pre-requisite lm_sensors-2.10.8-2.el5.elrepo.i386.rpm. Thanks again to you and to Yves, who also responded. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
Ditto here as well. All 133 packages updated without a problem. When re-booting, got a 'warning' that kdump had to rebuild. Once that completed, everything seems as it was before. Yes, things do seem a little 'snappier' - maybe it's only a delusion brought about by wishful thinking - I like it when it happens though. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On 05/15/2010 02:49 PM, E Westphal informed us: Ditto here as well. All 133 packages updated without a problem. When re-booting, got a 'warning' that kdump had to rebuild. Once that completed, everything seems as it was before. Yes, things do seem a little 'snappier' - maybe it's only a delusion brought about by wishful thinking - I like it when it happens though. I thought I noticed snappier, too. Only problem I had was that I stupidly failed to change xorg.conf to not use proprietary driver before rebooting. They say cross-pollination will fair eat your lunch. :-( Only disappointment so far is that lm_sensors still doesn't grok the AMD K-10 thermal sensors - a situation I grumble about even as I file it in the beggars can't be choosers folder. Thanks Karanbir and whoever else worked on this release! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
Robert wrote: snip Only disappointment so far is that lm_sensors still doesn't grok the AMD K-10 thermal sensors - a situation I grumble about even as I file it in the beggars can't be choosers folder. That's because your kernel does not have a k10temp driver - it was only introduced into the mainline kernel around 2.6.32. There is a backported driver in ELRepo: http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-k10temp yum install kmod-k10temp Red Hat did do a huge backport refresh of the /hwmon tree in el5.5, but they pulled from around kernel-2.6.26 which was before k10temp made it into the mainline kernel. Hope that helps. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On Saturday 15 May 2010 16:34, Robert wrote: Only disappointment so far is that lm_sensors still doesn't grok the AMD K-10 thermal sensors - a situation I grumble about even as I file it in the beggars can't be choosers folder. That's strange, because lM-sensors now detects my AMD Phenom. Did you install kmod-k10temp? -- Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca La Konsulo reprenos siajn funkciojn post trisemajna foresto. La tuta esperanta popolo estu dankema al la Vickonsulo. -- Heroldo Komunikas, n-ro 418. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:49 PM, E Westphal enwes...@rochester.rr.com wrote: Ditto here as well. All 133 packages updated without a problem. When re-booting, got a 'warning' that kdump had to rebuild. Once that completed, everything seems as it was before. Yes, things do seem a little 'snappier' - maybe it's only a delusion brought about by wishful thinking - I like it when it happens though. As I posted earlier, after a few apparent glitches during the package retrieval process, everything seemed to go well. I noted that when dkms was installed, it choked on my nvidia driver and fuse-ntfs-3, but they're both in the weak-updates as links to the older versions that ran with 2.6.18-164.15.1, and I'm pretty sure the nvidia driver is running (shows in lsmod). I just hooked up one of my older laptop Windows disks, and it seems to work just fine, too, so I think that means all is well. THANK YOU, CENTOS TEAM! mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
