Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
Can you please stop this? You are creating new thread after new thread from old threads I wasn't interested in and set to ignore. Now you create them as new threads, so I have to ignore these as well. This grows annoying. Put together with your habit of off-topic posting YOU get annoying. Thanks. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Can you please stop this? You are creating new thread after new thread from old threads I wasn't interested in and set to ignore. Now you create them as new threads, so I have to ignore these as well. This grows annoying. Put together with your habit of off-topic posting YOU get annoying. Thanks. I am sorry (for you) to hear that you are tool-challenged to the extent that you can not select what you want to read. There are tools for that, perhaps even meds for that. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
Gentleman: Can we all just get along? I love reading this list and posting my own questions as well... But really - is this helping anyone? On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Can you please stop this? You are creating new thread after new thread from old threads I wasn't interested in and set to ignore. Now you create them as new threads, so I have to ignore these as well. This grows annoying. Put together with your habit of off-topic posting YOU get annoying. Thanks. I am sorry (for you) to hear that you are tool-challenged to the extent that you can not select what you want to read. There are tools for that, perhaps even meds for that. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware http://flossware.sourceforge.net https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIMhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim Chief Architect Keros http://sourceforge.net/projects/keros ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
Scot P. Floess wrote: Gentleman: Can we all just get along? I love reading this list and posting my own questions as well... But really - is this helping anyone? I've done occasional OT posts, but I stop - this set of threads has been going on all week, I think, or was it since last Friday. Please take it offlist. In the past, I've occasionally done that, rather than keep OT stuff in an inappropriate forum. mark (not a gentleman, neither by breeding, nor Act of Congress - g) On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Can you please stop this? You are creating new thread after new thread from old threads I wasn't interested in and set to ignore. Now you create them as new threads, so I have to ignore these as well. This grows annoying. Put together with your habit of off-topic posting YOU get annoying. Thanks. I am sorry (for you) to hear that you are tool-challenged to the extent that you can not select what you want to read. There are tools for that, perhaps even meds for that. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware http://flossware.sourceforge.net https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIMhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim Chief Architect Keros http://sourceforge.net/projects/keros ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: Can we all just get along? I love reading this list and posting my own questions as well... But really - is this helping anyone? We were taught by our Rhodes scholar debate mentor to refute untruths and that is what I did. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Can you please stop this? You are creating new thread after new thread from old threads I wasn't interested in and set to ignore. Now you create them as new threads, so I have to ignore these as well. This grows annoying. Put together with your habit of off-topic posting YOU get annoying. Thanks. I am sorry (for you) to hear that you are tool-challenged to the extent that you can not select what you want to read. There are tools for that, perhaps even meds for that. ___ I'm sure many people won't mind if you get banned from this list. Stop this stupid OT stuff. If you have something against FOSS, then go and tell you M$ buddies, I'm sure they'll enjoy this kind of childishness. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Larry Vaden Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 10:50 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: Can we all just get along? I love reading this list and posting my own questions as well... But really - is this helping anyone? We were taught by our Rhodes scholar debate mentor to refute untruths and that is what I did. Temperance being a virtue (in moderation at least): Refute untruths that are pertinent to CentOS on the CentOS list, refute other untruths in private conversation or on other lists. This list has a long-term objective: To be a search/query archive for people trying to solve problems with their CentOS systems. The lower the signal/noise ratio, the less useful our conversation here. Please respond on this list to messages on this list with this in mind. //me *** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
Sure - I get it... But any prolonged debate - just address those concerns/issues with that person... I hate to say it, but I suspect either nobody cares or just doesn't want to hear it... Remember, I responded to you directly about an earlier post as I didn't feel it added any value to this mailing list. This is exactly what I meant and why... On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: Can we all just get along? I love reading this list and posting my own questions as well... But really - is this helping anyone? We were taught by our Rhodes scholar debate mentor to refute untruths and that is what I did. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware http://flossware.sourceforge.net https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIMhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim Chief Architect Keros http://sourceforge.net/projects/keros___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: Sure - I get it... But any prolonged debate - just address those concerns/issues with that person... I hate to say it, but I suspect either nobody cares or just doesn't want to hear it... Remember, I responded to you directly about an earlier post as I didn't feel it added any value to this mailing list. This is exactly what I meant and why... On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: Can we all just get along? I love reading this list and posting my own questions as well... But really - is this helping anyone? We were taught by our Rhodes scholar debate mentor to refute untruths and that is what I did. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware http://flossware.sourceforge.net https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIM http://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim Chief Architect Keros http://sourceforge.net/projects/keros ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos List infraction per http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
On 17 February 2011 16:06, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote: List infraction per http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16. This was amusing to start with, but now it's irritating. Please stop. Ben ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
List infraction per http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16. Larry, I try to conduct myself in a professional manner whenever I am visible to the world. I am doing my best to do so now. There are many things I'd like to say and am not going to do so... So, how about this - if you care to continue this conversation, please email me directly and I'll be happy to discuss this further. Yours truly, Scot ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
Ben, My apologies - I don't typically get caught up in this type of pointless tit-for-tat... I'll personally stop... -- Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware http://flossware.sourceforge.net https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare Chief Architect JPlate http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate Chief Architect JavaPIMhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim Chief Architect Keros http://sourceforge.net/projects/keros ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: Sure - I get it... Â But any prolonged debate - just address those concerns/issues with that person... I hate to say it, but I suspect either nobody cares or just doesn't want to hear it... Remember, I responded to you directly about an earlier post as I didn't feel it added any value to this mailing list. Â This is exactly what I meant and why... snip List infraction per http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16. I don't care how old you are, this is sophomoric, the kind of crap we'd see every September and Jan or Feb, back when I was hanging out a lot on usenet in the early nineties. Grow up - what are you, some kind of Aggie? mark, naturalized Texan (Austin resident, '86-'94) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
Larry, enough is enough. Please stop your behavior. This list is not for your personal amusement. If you cannot behave like any other person on the list, please go elsewhere. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
This whole discussion is off-topic and getting to be really annoying. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
On 02/17/2011 04:59 AM, Mark wrote: This whole discussion is off-topic and getting to be really annoying. yes, please take it to somewhere more appropriate. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
