Re: [CentOS] Test

2019-07-07 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach 
On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 09:37:36AM +0100, Lucian (n...@li.nux.ro) wrote:
> Just testing, sorry for the noise.

Sorry for highjacking this.
I do not receive any of my emails sent to the list although I have ticked 
"receive you won posts" in the mailman interface.

I am trying to trace this problem with this reply.



-- 
Jobst Schmalenbach
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-27 Thread Andreas Benzler 
Am Dienstag, den 27.06.2017, 11:08 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
> On 06/27/2017 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > The only exception:  if the CentOS team introduced a bug in our
> > rebuild
> > that is not present in RHEL source code, we will not fix it.  That
> > is
> > just what CentOS Linux is.
> 
> I obviously meant if we introduced the issue, and it is NOT an issue
> in
> RHEL, we WILL fix it :)
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Thanx for clear that up to me. I will follow "your" line up.

Sincerely

Andy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-27 Thread Johnny Hughes 
On 06/27/2017 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> The only exception:  if the CentOS team introduced a bug in our rebuild
> that is not present in RHEL source code, we will not fix it.  That is
> just what CentOS Linux is.

I obviously meant if we introduced the issue, and it is NOT an issue in
RHEL, we WILL fix it :)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-27 Thread Johnny Hughes 
On 06/26/2017 02:02 PM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> Sorry Hughes,
> 
> got some questions. 
> 
> I have the feeling that I do a lot wrong. Today I sent a mailing post
> at fedora where it is also about btrfs under fedora.
> 
> In time when i write the mail i forward it my patch for fedora 25
> pretransaction & snapper.yp, with the hope of feedback.
> 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject
> .org/thread/NLFYHW3IEJHSFBUOEAVHDHBVTL7TOHYZ/
> 
> Sometimes I don't know where to push the information.
> 
> on https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/CentOS7Python34/
> 
> I release a ticket because snapper gui do not build on there repo.
> Local with mock or without it never fails. No response.
> 
> Since yesterday learned how to use snapper against the dbus api. What
> is the better way in my opinion. After some rest i will do it first on
> centos and it back into fedora "dnf" later on.
> 
> It looks to me as if in a Fedora release little movement. If someone
> wants to upgrade something you simply move it there gladly times on the
> next release. This generates a high unwilling something at all a
> working release to submit an improvement. This is a lot better under
> Centos, although Redhat is very slow with its update cycles.
> 
> Too bad the feedback is not as good as under Centos.
> 
> In principal there are to many ways to push errors or improvments on
> each (centos, redhat, fedora) distros.
> 
> Or am I doing something wrong. Is there anything I can do better?
> 
> It is hopefully not that I care 3 various Linux (This time
> Arch/Manjaro, Fedora, Centos). It helps to get ideas.
> 

Well .. CentOS Linux (The os/, cr/ , fasttrack/ , and updates/ repos)
are exact rebuilds of upstream RHEL source code with only branding
changes.  We do no technical changes to this sorce code at all.  We
build it .. end of story.

If something does not work in CentOS Linux and it also does not work in
RHEL .. then great.  We want CentOS Linux to work exactly that way .. so
we will NOT make technical changes to get it to work in CentOS Linux.
The only exception:  if the CentOS team introduced a bug in our rebuild
that is not present in RHEL source code, we will not fix it.  That is
just what CentOS Linux is.

If you want to get something fixed in CentOS that is also broken in
RHEL, you must submit the changes to Red Hat via either the Fedora or
RHEL bug processes.  Once those changes are in released into RHEL (and
therefore into the public RHEL source code) they will rolled into CentOS
Linux.

For other CentOS repositories where we actually manage the content and
DO make technical changes (extras/ , centosplus/ any of the SIG repos,
etc), you can submit changes to CentOS to get things fixed.

Hopefully this clears up what CentOS Linux is defined as and why we
don't make technical changes.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-26 Thread Andreas Benzler 
Sorry Hughes,

got some questions. 

I have the feeling that I do a lot wrong. Today I sent a mailing post
at fedora where it is also about btrfs under fedora.

In time when i write the mail i forward it my patch for fedora 25
pretransaction & snapper.yp, with the hope of feedback.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject
.org/thread/NLFYHW3IEJHSFBUOEAVHDHBVTL7TOHYZ/

Sometimes I don't know where to push the information.

on https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/CentOS7Python34/

I release a ticket because snapper gui do not build on there repo.
Local with mock or without it never fails. No response.

Since yesterday learned how to use snapper against the dbus api. What
is the better way in my opinion. After some rest i will do it first on
centos and it back into fedora "dnf" later on.

It looks to me as if in a Fedora release little movement. If someone
wants to upgrade something you simply move it there gladly times on the
next release. This generates a high unwilling something at all a
working release to submit an improvement. This is a lot better under
Centos, although Redhat is very slow with its update cycles.

Too bad the feedback is not as good as under Centos.

In principal there are to many ways to push errors or improvments on
each (centos, redhat, fedora) distros.

Or am I doing something wrong. Is there anything I can do better?

It is hopefully not that I care 3 various Linux (This time
Arch/Manjaro, Fedora, Centos). It helps to get ideas.

Thanks for advice.

Sincerely

Andy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Andreas Benzler 
Hello Hughes,

Had experimental my gst-test installed ~ gstreamer 1.6.4 
and there seems to be a hardware video playback function.
By the wild gstreamer mix of course not stable.

Have only proven that the compilate for intel ok on my laptop.

Sincerely

Andy

Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 05:52 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
> On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> > 
> > 
> > Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. 
> > Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with 
> > new kernel.
> > 
> > linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch
> > 
> 
> If people want an experimental kernel and linux-firmware that lives in
> the centos namespace, we have this:
> 
> 
> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/
> 
> There are i386 and x86_64 kernels there.
> 
> Currently we are tracking the 4.9 LTS kernel branch and the fedora
> linux-firmware mentioned above.
> 
> This is also the kernel that we use in the armhfp (32 bit Arm) SIG.
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Johnny Hughes 
On 06/10/2017 08:47 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> Hallo Hughes,
> 
> thanks to let me know. It is good that you have a focus on LTS 4.9.
>  
> Unfortunately it is so that the new graphics cards from amd to today are not 
> served in the opensource.
> That's why I'm experimenting with the latest stable versions and what is so. 
> 
> My laptop has done the linux-firmware update well, it is nevertheless one of 
> the newest. 
> 
> The kernel and appropriate firmware is unfortunately only the one side of a 
> driver when it comes to graphics cards.
> 
> The hardware decoding works only sometimes. On CentOS in the moment not 
> (Radeon / Intel), 
> but that is not synonymous the focus of a server system. This happens to me 
> also with the
> original packages.
> 
> I give my homework free in the thought that it might help somebody out there.
> 


No problem at all, and thanks for posting.  It might indeed help others.

If you take a look at the git repo for the linux-firmware, you can see
the actions that make that installable on both CentOS-7 and also for
CentOS-6 in the xen kernel tree (a couple of obsoletes and some other
minor changes).

https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!linux-firmware.git

Keep up the good work.


> Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 05:52 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
>> On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>> Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. 
>>> Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with 
>>> new kernel.
>>>
>>> linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch
>>>
>>
>> If people want an experimental kernel and linux-firmware that lives in
>> the centos namespace, we have this:
>>
>>
>> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/
>>
>> There are i386 and x86_64 kernels there.
>>
>> Currently we are tracking the 4.9 LTS kernel branch and the fedora
>> linux-firmware mentioned above.
>>
>> This is also the kernel that we use in the armhfp (32 bit Arm) SIG.
>>




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Andreas Benzler 
Hallo Hughes,

thanks to let me know. It is good that you have a focus on LTS 4.9.
 
Unfortunately it is so that the new graphics cards from amd to today are not 
served in the opensource.
That's why I'm experimenting with the latest stable versions and what is so. 

My laptop has done the linux-firmware update well, it is nevertheless one of 
the newest. 

The kernel and appropriate firmware is unfortunately only the one side of a 
driver when it comes to graphics cards.

The hardware decoding works only sometimes. On CentOS in the moment not (Radeon 
/ Intel), 
but that is not synonymous the focus of a server system. This happens to me 
also with the
original packages.

I give my homework free in the thought that it might help somebody out there.

Sincerely

Andy

Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 05:52 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
> On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> > 
> > 
> > Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. 
> > Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with 
> > new kernel.
> > 
> > linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch
> > 
> 
> If people want an experimental kernel and linux-firmware that lives in
> the centos namespace, we have this:
> 
> 
> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/
> 
> There are i386 and x86_64 kernels there.
> 
> Currently we are tracking the 4.9 LTS kernel branch and the fedora
> linux-firmware mentioned above.
> 
> This is also the kernel that we use in the armhfp (32 bit Arm) SIG.
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Johnny Hughes 
On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> 
> 
> Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. 
> Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with 
> new kernel.
> 
> linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch
> 

If people want an experimental kernel and linux-firmware that lives in
the centos namespace, we have this:


http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/

There are i386 and x86_64 kernels there.

Currently we are tracking the 4.9 LTS kernel branch and the fedora
linux-firmware mentioned above.

This is also the kernel that we use in the armhfp (32 bit Arm) SIG.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (drivers, mesa, kernel)

2017-05-29 Thread Andreas Benzler 
Today I confirm all drivers working propertly on 

HP Laptop

skylake i5-7200U CPU, HD Graphics 620 (Kaby Lake GT2)

Kernel 4.11.3, libdrm 2.4.81, xorg  x11 2.99.917-21.20170418,
libva 1.8.2, Mesa3D 17.1.1 (llvm 3.9.1)

Tested World of warcraft with my old winehq.

Totem Hardware decoded video

Cheers ...

Andy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (drivers, mesa, kernel)

2017-05-28 Thread Andreas Benzler 
Forgotten so say I tested the opensource against the one from AMD.

Both drivers works for me. The AMD Version can be used without my repo.

I look forward to rework wine 2.8 on centos from the spec file of
fedora 25.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test

2017-01-18 Thread Fabian Arrotin 
On 18/01/17 19:33, TE Dukes wrote:
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Hal Wigoda
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:18 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Test
> 
> No.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Is it working?
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> 
> 
> Been getting these since last night
> 
>   This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.  
> 
> Delivery to the following recipients failed permanently:
> 
>* centos@centos.org
> 
> Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with
> [Subject: "Test"] to centos@centos.org. MTA
> p3plsmtpa11-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the
> destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 -  550 , 550 5.7.1 <centos@centos.org>:
> Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: SPF fail - not
> authorized. Please see
> http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=tdu...@palmettoshopper.com;ip=68.178.2
> 52.106;r=centos@centos.org
> .

Yes, it seems you had a SPF in place for your domain, but that is now
removed ?

 dig -t txt +short +noshort palmettoshopper.com => empty

And the fact that your mails reach again the list is a proof that it now
works
-- 
Fabian Arrotin
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test

2017-01-18 Thread Mike McCarthy, W1NR 
The SPF record for your email provider did not match the sending systems
for your domain. Possibly the IP address or DNS record changed recently
at your ISP?


On 01/18/2017 01:33 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Hal Wigoda
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:18 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Test
>
> No.
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is it working?
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
> Been getting these since last night
>
>   This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.  
>
> Delivery to the following recipients failed permanently:
>
>* centos@centos.org
>
> Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with
> [Subject: "Test"] to centos@centos.org. MTA
> p3plsmtpa11-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the
> destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 -  550 , 550 5.7.1 <centos@centos.org>:
> Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: SPF fail - not
> authorized. Please see
> http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=tdu...@palmettoshopper.com;ip=68.178.2
> 52.106;r=centos@centos.org
> .
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test

2017-01-18 Thread TE Dukes 


-Original Message-
From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Hal Wigoda
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:18 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Test

No.

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com>
wrote:

> Is it working?
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


Been getting these since last night

  This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.  

Delivery to the following recipients failed permanently:

   * centos@centos.org

Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with
[Subject: "Test"] to centos@centos.org. MTA
p3plsmtpa11-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the
destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 -  550 , 550 5.7.1 <centos@centos.org>:
Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: SPF fail - not
authorized. Please see
http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=tdu...@palmettoshopper.com;ip=68.178.2
52.106;r=centos@centos.org
.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test

2017-01-18 Thread Hal Wigoda 
No.

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes 
wrote:

> Is it working?
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
-
Hal Wigoda
Chicago
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test builds on mesa

2016-05-11 Thread Andreas Benzler 
Correct my self:

libdrm version is 2.6.8

mesa 11.2 needs libdrm < 2.6.6, can be compile with the centos private-llvm 
3.6.1
mesa 11.1 libdrm < 2.6.1  

mesa 10.6.9 can build without  external upgrades.

Rebuild mesa, only needs cms4all-drivers.
If you are use wine, you need it twice x86_64 and i686

Sincerely

Andy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test. Do Not Respond

2015-04-23 Thread Valeri Galtsev 

On my mail list servers this is good enough reason for banning from any
subscriptions...

On Wed, April 22, 2015 10:35 pm, Chris Weisiger wrote:

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test, and H/W

2015-02-12 Thread m . roth 
John R Pierce wrote:
 On 2/12/2015 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 I finally talked to Dell, and was told, and I quote,
 ... three terabyte drives aren't supported the raid controller
 installed in this server, the SAS 6 i/r.

 the SAS 6/iR is a LSI SAS 1068E chip, kind of an old chip (the 1068
 stuff was long ago replaced by 2008, 2308, and now 30xx stuff). The SAS
 6/iR Dell article I'm looking at is from May 2008.   There were no 3TB
 drives 7 years ago.

True. However, vendors will try to sell what systems they have in stock,
until they either run out of them, or someone decides they're too old.
Plus, I'm 100% sure that a lot of folks here are still running older
hardware, just as we are.

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test, and H/W

2015-02-12 Thread John R Pierce 

On 2/12/2015 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

I finally talked to Dell, and was told, and I quote,
... three terabyte drives aren't supported the raid controller installed
in this server, the SAS 6 i/r.


the SAS 6/iR is a LSI SAS 1068E chip, kind of an old chip (the 1068 
stuff was long ago replaced by 2008, 2308, and now 30xx stuff). The SAS 
6/iR Dell article I'm looking at is from May 2008.   There were no 3TB 
drives 7 years ago.




--
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test

2012-10-31 Thread Frank Cox 
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:22:44 +
Nux! wrote:

 test

Pieces of Nine!  Pieces of Nine!

(Parroty Error)

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test

2010-07-06 Thread Larry Brower 
mattias jonsson wrote:
 

Failed, please study harder.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test

2010-07-06 Thread mattias jonsson 
I'm sorry for the test should not be repeted

-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För Larry
Brower
Skickat: den 7 juli 2010 02:22
Till: CentOS mailing list
Ämne: Re: [CentOS] test


mattias jonsson wrote:
 

Failed, please study harder. ___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test

2009-10-05 Thread Chan Chung Hang Christopher 
Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
 testing mail delivery

   
deliver failure: 550 Administrative Prohibition
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore

2009-01-02 Thread Vandaman 
Anne Wilson wrote:

 blank

Hi,

Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for?

Regards, 
Vandaman.
---
Your average reporting time for spam is: 5 hours; Great!
noob detector - 3 noobs top posting.



  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore

2009-01-02 Thread Anne Wilson 
On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote:
 Anne Wilson wrote:
  blank

 Hi,

 Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for?

Hi, Vandaman.  I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a 
test.  CentOS is the last filter, so if that worked correctly I knew I was OK.  
Sorry to have bothered you all.

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore

2009-01-02 Thread mouss 
Anne Wilson a écrit :
 On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote:
 Anne Wilson wrote:
 blank
 Hi,

 Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for?

 Hi, Vandaman.  I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a 
 test.  CentOS is the last filter, so if that worked correctly I knew I was 
 OK.  
 Sorry to have bothered you all.
 

but that was a lazy test, wasn't it? instead of Test - please ignore,
you could have said Happy ymas (or the like) and nobody would have
known that you were testing :)

best wishes and all that stuff...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore

2009-01-02 Thread Anne Wilson 
On Friday 02 January 2009 22:28:50 mouss wrote:
 Anne Wilson a écrit :
  On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote:
  Anne Wilson wrote:
  blank
 
  Hi,
 
  Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for?
 
  Hi, Vandaman.  I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a
  test.  CentOS is the last filter, so if that worked correctly I knew I
  was OK. Sorry to have bothered you all.

 but that was a lazy test, wasn't it? instead of Test - please ignore,
 you could have said Happy ymas (or the like) and nobody would have
 known that you were testing :)

 best wishes and all that stuff...

:-)

Yup - all that stuff to you too :-)

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test

2008-03-25 Thread Rudi Ahlers 

J C wrote:
hello everyone, i just signed up onto the mailing list, testing.  nice 
to meet you all!
 
JC



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  

got it :)

--

Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
CEO, SoftDux

Web:   http://www.SoftDux.com
Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other 
technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stugg

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos