[CentOS] Switching to php53
I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages. These currently contain PHP 5.1.6. My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of WordPress. I currently had WP 3.1.2 installed, but the WP developers have announced that from WP 3.2 they will only support PHP 5. and greater. So I investigated and found that the Centos repo contains a series of php53 packages. I tried to install php53 using yum but got the following error: Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package php53.x86_64 0:5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: php53-cli = 5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 for package: php53 -- Processing Dependency: php53-common = 5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 for package: php53 -- Running transaction check --- Package php53-cli.x86_64 0:5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 set to be updated --- Package php53-common.x86_64 0:5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 set to be updated -- Processing Conflict: php53-common conflicts php-common -- Finished Dependency Resolution php53-common-5.3.3-1.el5_6.1.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems -- php53-common conflicts with php-common Error: php53-common conflicts with php-common You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I would have thought that the new php53-common package would have obsoleted php-common rather than conflicting with it. Is there a clean way to replace php with php53? Or should I just wait and hope that Centos 6 is released before WP 3.2 :) Thanks, Dave... -- Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk http://dave.org.uk/ @davorg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Switching to php53
2011/4/30 Dave Cross dav...@gmail.com: I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages. These currently contain PHP 5.1.6. My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of WordPress. I currently had WP 3.1.2 installed, but the WP developers have announced that from WP 3.2 they will only support PHP 5. and greater. So I investigated and found that the Centos repo contains a series of php53 packages. I tried to install php53 using yum but got the following error: Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package php53.x86_64 0:5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: php53-cli = 5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 for package: php53 -- Processing Dependency: php53-common = 5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 for package: php53 -- Running transaction check --- Package php53-cli.x86_64 0:5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 set to be updated --- Package php53-common.x86_64 0:5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 set to be updated -- Processing Conflict: php53-common conflicts php-common -- Finished Dependency Resolution php53-common-5.3.3-1.el5_6.1.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems -- php53-common conflicts with php-common Error: php53-common conflicts with php-common You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I would have thought that the new php53-common package would have obsoleted php-common rather than conflicting with it. Is there a clean way to replace php with php53? Or should I just wait and hope that Centos 6 is released before WP 3.2 :) just remove php and php-common yum remove php php-common -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to access lvm inside lvm
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:27 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 04/29/11 3:05 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote: I have a centos 5.6 server that has xen domUs installed on their on logical volumes. These logical volumes contain their own volume groups and again their own logical volumes. I want to ... ugh, and double ugh. this violates the KISS 'keep it super simple' principle, and I can only see the extra layers of complexity leading to more frustration. I would instead run LVM only on dom0, and have your domU's creating file systems directly on the virtual devices mapped to said LVs. if you need to grow a file system, you resize the LV from dom0, and then growfs in the domU I agree and the newer domUs I have created do not use LVM. This was one of the first domUs I created with virt-manager and when installing the OS I just clicked my way through the CentOS installation like I usually do, and that meant using LVM. And I don't think you are even given an option to define the default vg name during the installation? Regards, Peter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Switching to php53
I would try to first yum erase php, and then install the php53 version. - Jussi On 30.4.2011 9.29, Dave Cross wrote: I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages. These currently contain PHP 5.1.6. My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of WordPress. I currently had WP 3.1.2 installed, but the WP developers have announced that from WP 3.2 they will only support PHP 5. and greater. So I investigated and found that the Centos repo contains a series of php53 packages. I tried to install php53 using yum but got the following error: Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package php53.x86_64 0:5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: php53-cli = 5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 for package: php53 -- Processing Dependency: php53-common = 5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 for package: php53 -- Running transaction check --- Package php53-cli.x86_64 0:5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 set to be updated --- Package php53-common.x86_64 0:5.3.3-1.el5_6.1 set to be updated -- Processing Conflict: php53-common conflicts php-common -- Finished Dependency Resolution php53-common-5.3.3-1.el5_6.1.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems -- php53-common conflicts with php-common Error: php53-common conflicts with php-common You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I would have thought that the new php53-common package would have obsoleted php-common rather than conflicting with it. Is there a clean way to replace php with php53? Or should I just wait and hope that Centos 6 is released before WP 3.2 :) Thanks, Dave... -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Suvilahdenkatu 1 B 78 * 00500 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hi...@greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Identifying physical disks
I am sure this is really simple. I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly identical, and are mirrors of each other. Together they form 3 raid1 devices. Both disks can boot. Now sda has bad sectors, and I should replace it. But which one of the physical disks is sda?? The machine boots fine from either one of the disks, (and the booting disk of course is always called sda). In the messages log I see entries like this: Apr 29 02:21:07 a134-224 kernel: ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) By noticing which SATA link (ata1, ata2) is up and which is down, I can find out which physical disk is connected to ata1 and which to ata2. If both disks are connected, will the hd in ata1 become sda, and the hd in ata2 become sdb?? - Jussi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Identifying physical disks
2011/4/30 Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi: I am sure this is really simple. I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly identical, and are mirrors of each other. Together they form 3 raid1 devices. Both disks can boot. Now sda has bad sectors, and I should replace it. But which one of the physical disks is sda?? take look at serial number using smartctl http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/using-smartctl-to-get-smart-status-information-on-your-hard-drives/1389 -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to access lvm inside lvm
Peter Peltonen wrote on 04/30/2011 03:51 AM: ... I just clicked my way through the CentOS installation like I usually do, and that meant using LVM. And I don't think you are even given an option to define the default vg name during the installation? If you want to use the default setup but have an opportunity to tweak, such as changing VG names, check the box to review and modify the partition setup on the page that lets you choose the partition method. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?
Paul Johnson wrote on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17:23 -0500: After that, what am I legally required to do? This is not the place to ask. I've just read that document and it seems to say that you could take all of the RPMs exactly as they are built by RedHat and include them on a disk, and you can label the disk Centos 6, and you are completely within the guidelines. It doesn't matter if you can or not. I wished you hadn't started this thread. Just more dead weight for the list. Please kill it by not replying yourself. This list once was a valuable peer-to-peer support list but has been turning into a meta-centos/rhel discussion list lately. There was already a lot of off-topic linux-only stuff on it in the past that didn't qualify for centosy things, but that at least was technical and some people might still benefit from it when working with CentOS. But this and the other discussion we had here lately is of interest to only a tiny minority. Admins, please stop this trend! Please consider opening a centos-discuss list that will welcome this sort of topic so we can get a clean list back. Thanks. I'm tired of evading dozens and dozens of posts to find the few valuable ones. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to access lvm inside lvm
Peter Peltonen wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:51:08 +0300: And I don't think you are even given an option to define the default vg name during the installation? Of course, you can ;-) If you have only a few of these I'd rsync them over to dom0 lv's and change domU fstabs and xen config accordingly. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Identifying physical disks
On 30.4.2011 12.34, Eero Volotinen wrote: take look at serial number using smartctl http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/using-smartctl-to-get-smart-status-information-on-your-hard-drives/1389 Thanks, I did. I am sure they will help me when it is time to actually replace the drive. - Jussi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:54:01 +0800: if they are accessible via the Internet, then it means it wasn't necessary to add any IP to a bridge. FYI: the IP addresses of host and guest don't have to be in the same subnet, e.g. your host may have a private, non-routable IP address only and your VMs may have routable public addresses, no problem. If there is a working bridge the virtualization software takes care of adding virtual interfaces as required, at least xen does that. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?
On 4/30/11 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: This list once was a valuable peer-to-peer support list but has been turning into a meta-centos/rhel discussion list lately. There was already a lot of off-topic linux-only stuff on it in the past that didn't qualify for centosy things, but that at least was technical and some people might still benefit from it when working with CentOS. But this and the other discussion we had here lately is of interest to only a tiny minority. But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically centosy, and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing the artwork Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here. We should probably be discussing how the eventual change to bios-order NIC naming is going to play out since that will affect a lot of us that move disks and copy images around - but Centos doesn't do alpha/beta releases (which does seem centos-specific) so we don't have anything to try. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 74, Issue 11
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2011:0474 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 thunderbird Update
(Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2011:0474 Critical CentOS 4 i386 thunderbird Update
(Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2011:0472 Important CentOS 4 i386 nss Update (Johnny Hughes)
4. CESA-2011:0472 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 nss Update
(Johnny Hughes)
5. CESA-2011:0473 Critical CentOS 4 i386 seamonkey Update
(Johnny Hughes)
6. CESA-2011:0473 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 seamonkey Update
(Johnny Hughes)
7. CESA-2011:0471 Critical CentOS 4 i386 firefox Update
(Johnny Hughes)
8. CESA-2011:0471 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox Update
(Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:51:36 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0474 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64
thunderbird Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20110429205136.ga30...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0474 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0474.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
083987e51c47be6f06c0f45f00592b14 thunderbird-1.5.0.12-38.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
22c38da5407e94af58cc1094e3e01785 thunderbird-1.5.0.12-38.el4.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:51:35 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0474 Critical CentOS 4 i386
thunderbird Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20110429205135.ga30...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0474 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0474.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
3adc6c00d576cff96d021d5e366b9b03 thunderbird-1.5.0.12-38.el4.centos.i386.rpm
Source:
22c38da5407e94af58cc1094e3e01785 thunderbird-1.5.0.12-38.el4.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:52:38 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0472 Important CentOS 4 i386 nss
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20110429205238.ga30...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0472 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0472.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
9c055c5e578703d613e13019d34c8f75 nss-3.12.8-3.el4.i386.rpm
88d89b8fc9a258c047d7e526f814e133 nss-devel-3.12.8-3.el4.i386.rpm
ee5600cd3761856a1c933310efc6a1f4 nss-tools-3.12.8-3.el4.i386.rpm
Source:
cc04f0fc179df4304e2724c5e66aa9ad nss-3.12.8-3.el4.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:52:38 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0472 Important CentOS 4 x86_64
nss Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20110429205238.ga30...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0472 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0472.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
8741490a97cac04107dacfb5018dc35c nss-3.12.8-3.el4.i386.rpm
c6869fe6c7c9fbc7b4ddf45f0cafda14 nss-3.12.8-3.el4.x86_64.rpm
23e7790e7f266d9175e65c12377a3dc9 nss-devel-3.12.8-3.el4.x86_64.rpm
f8a78935e74b88554786d99f1e3498e9 nss-tools-3.12.8-3.el4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
cc04f0fc179df4304e2724c5e66aa9ad nss-3.12.8-3.el4.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011
[CentOS] exim FASTTRACK
CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages, Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information about it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606272 The only information I see is comment 16 which is referring back to the RHBA. Does anyone have some insight ? What is #606272 about ? Maybe I should ask Upstream Vendor ? Is it normal that information about fasttracked packages is not available publicly ? -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] exim FASTTRACK
The title gives a bit of info if that helps ;-) Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?
Les Mikesell wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:33:21 -0500: But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically centosy, and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing the artwork Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here. Are we? I don't see this and I don't understand your remark. I suppose you didn't understand *my* request. I ask that people behave so that this list remains a valuable source for peer-to-peer support. With all that recent discussion it is not anymore. As it seems that people cannot behave, then please let's have a list where people can be referred to if they digress. I've been subscribed to this list for more than five years now, I'm considering unsubscribing because of the sheer amount of off-topic stuff. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] With kickstart (Re: Install CentOS as KVM guest)
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote: BTW, can guests be installed on raw (unformatted or formatted) partitions (not images)? Can virt-install do that? I tried it and had no luck. - Jussi You can install them to logical volumes... On 28.4.2011 21.29, Jim Wildman wrote: Season to taste virt-install -p -n test_phys -r 512 --arch=x86_64 --os-type=linux --os-variant=rhel5 -lhttp://192.168.200.2/c5u5_x86_64 -x ks=http://192.168.200.2/buildhost.ks -f /dev/vg_tosh/lv_phys -b virbr0 It took me some time to get the kickstart file load at all, because I also had to fit in the console specification, to get a text-based installation. This is what the script now looks (only name and ip changed): virt-install --name myvm \ --os-variant rhel5.4 --ram 512 \ --vcpus 1 --accelerate \ --nographics -v \ --location /mnt/centos56/ --network bridge:br0 \ --disk path=/kv2/myvm.img,size=15 \ --extra-args ks=http://12.34.56.78/anaconda-ks.ks console=ttyS0; There is a mounted CentOS 5.6 DVD at /mnt/centos56. The kickstart file specifies the URL for http installation of CentOS 5.6. It worked just beautifully, and fast too. The installer only asked me if I am sure that I want to format the virtual sisk. Otherwise it was all automatic. What a pleasure! - Jussi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] exim FASTTRACK
On 30/04/11 17:57, Markus Falb wrote: CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages, Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information about it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606272 The only information I see is comment 16 which is referring back to the RHBA. Does anyone have some insight ? What is #606272 about ? Maybe I should ask Upstream Vendor ? Is it normal that information about fasttracked packages is not available publicly ? The Fastrack release ONLY addresses the local_scan() and man page issues to which you refer; see here: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html The other issue was addressed in a previous bug fix errata: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0522.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?
On 4/30/11 1:09 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically centosy, and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing the artwork Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here. Are we? I don't see this and I don't understand your remark. Has it really been so long since the upstream release that you've forgotten that we might someday see a corresponding CentOS version and have to start figuring out how to use it? I suppose you didn't understand *my* request. I ask that people behave so that this list remains a valuable source for peer-to-peer support. I do understand it, but since you wanted specifically Centos issues, it's hard to complain about the topic of how RHEL differs from Centos, since that and a few quirks of yum are really the only things specific to Centos. And it's not like an extra message or two is going to displace any technical information. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 21:56, NOYK service.acco...@insightbb.com wrote: Given the difficulty of getting Centos 6 released - maybe this is not the correct group to ask. Just saying. ;) It seems to me that is exactly why he was asking. The OP doesn't really want to create Paul Linux, he wants to know what CentOS does to RHEL to make it CentOS. Superficially, grepping for redhat in the source and compiling doesn't sound like 6 months worth of delays. I thought it was a clever, respectful way of asking the question. That said, I do appreciate how much work goes into a CentOS release. I do know that it is not a simple grep! So the answer to Paul's question intrigues me as well. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Identifying physical disks
On 04/30/2011 11:30 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: I am sure this is really simple. I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly identical, and are mirrors of each other. Together they form 3 raid1 devices. Both disks can boot. Now sda has bad sectors, and I should replace it. But which one of the physical disks is sda?? The machine boots fine from either one of the disks, (and the booting disk of course is always called sda). In the messages log I see entries like this: Apr 29 02:21:07 a134-224 kernel: ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) By noticing which SATA link (ata1, ata2) is up and which is down, I can find out which physical disk is connected to ata1 and which to ata2. If both disks are connected, will the hd in ata1 become sda, and the hd in ata2 become sdb?? - Jussi run hdparm -tT /dev/sda and identify sda - it is the one with the blinking LEDs. HTH, Kay ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?
Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't. it's hard to complain about the topic of how RHEL differs from Centos Are you referring to this thread? It's not about differences. It's about how to build Centos in a better way than it has been done till now. This doesn't belong here. Maybe it belongs on the devel list or on a new list, not here. And I think you know very well that this thread is just the latest in a series of similarly off-topic threads about centos politics/policy and I'm referring to them as a whole. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?
On 4/30/11 4:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't. You asked for something 'centos-y'. And there really is nothing specific to centos other than it's differences from upstream., most of which aren't technical. it's hard to complain about the topic of how RHEL differs from Centos Are you referring to this thread? It's not about differences. It's about how to build Centos in a better way than it has been done till now. I didn't see either a question or an answer about anything but the differences in this thread. And while the answers weren't new, they were centos-specific and interesting. And I think you know very well that this thread is just the latest in a series of similarly off-topic threads about centos politics/policy and I'm referring to them as a whole. Maybe, but it's not like we could be filling the mail list capacity with descriptions of how great it is to be using all the new features yet anyway. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-docs] Edit permissions: quick cleanup of QaWiki/AutomatedTests
G'day Wiki username: SteveBarnes As per the guidelines on: http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5 I'd like to tidy up this page a bit: http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/AutomatedTests I used it as the basis for developing my test scripts; the formatting for the code examples is a little wonky so I thought I'd tidy it up so others can read the snippets easier. Cheers Steve ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-es] Autentificación y creación de iuna red Wi-fi
Saludos, hermanos. un solo equipo, este es el Router Mikrotik RB450 o 750 ya que este equipo Jejejejejeje. Buen intento, pero como dice el hermano, donde vivimos no tenemos acceso a esos toys, así que todo lo tenemos que hacer a mano. :) Aunque también soy partidario de hacer al AP uno mismo. ;) Hermano eso es muy duroi para mi, donde vivo no puedo comprarlo, desearia implementarlo con Access Point, que esta en cascada y se conectan aun Switcher y de ahi a server linux con radius Chico, creo que tienes todo lo necesario, un AP conectado a la red, un RADIUS sobre un Linux, solamente te queda configurar el AP para que se tire contra el RADIUS, generar los certificados (entidad emisora con to'lo'metales), EAP y estamos jugando. Dime como hacer pues no puedo comprar ni tener nada, solo tengo los AP, Tienes bastante. Yo estuve jugando un tiempo con un AP MSI e hice parte de eso. :) -- Este mensaje le ha llegado mediante el servicio de correo electronico que ofrece Infomed para respaldar el cumplimiento de las misiones del Sistema Nacional de Salud. La persona que envia este correo asume el compromiso de usar el servicio a tales fines y cumplir con las regulaciones establecidas Infomed: http://www.sld.cu/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
