Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:30:23PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On Jun 9, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Michael Hennebry >wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > >> Maybe we need another mailing list, like alt.religion.editors*, we could > >> have alt.religion.systemd > >> > >> mark > >> > >> * vi, not emacs! Nya > > > > You mean 6, right? > > The developer of Sublime Text is hard at work on his third attempt at a Vi > emulating plugin, apparently having run into walls with the prior two > attempts. He is calling his latest attempt…Six. :) > somehow nobody reads old stuff, or maybe everybody ignores it. Bill Joy and Mark Horton wrote DECADES ago that its name is Vee-Eye, not Vye, or Six (or 6). -- --- Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the result of an unsolicited e-mail message. Nor will I forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online community. --Roger Ebert, December, 1996 - The Boulder Pledge - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:10:16PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/9/2017 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > >>I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that > >>can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. > >> > >>OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > >>device:) > >Raspberry Pi 3B 35 bucks notincluding power supply or SD card. > > > >the only thing I'm not sure of is the PXE part. > > > Pi 3 supports PXE over ethernet without using an SD card... I don't > believe the older Pi's do, unless you put the PXE bootloader on an > SD card. > > I usually figure a Pi costs $50 + SD card, as I like to put them in > a case, and they do need a decent 2 amp MicroUSB PSU, you can get a > case + wallwart for $15 on top of the $35 board cost. For Pi3B the recommend wallwart is 2.5 amps. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord detests the way of the wicked but he loves those who pursue righteousness. - Proverbs 15:9 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:44:47 -0400 Fred Smithwrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and > > wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and > > hopefully supporting PXE. > > > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > > device :) > > Raspberry Pi 3B 35 bucks notincluding power supply or SD card. > > the only thing I'm not sure of is the PXE part. > > see here: https://www.reddit.com/r/raspberry_pi/comments/48af52/raspberry_pi_3_usb_and_pxe_network_boot_boot/ d -- In modern fantasy (literary or governmental), killing people is the usual solution to the so-called war between good and evil. My books are not conceived in terms of such a war, and offer no simple answers to simplistic questions. - Ursula Le Guin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test builds on private server updates (mesa, kernel)
Hello Guys, I really wanted to just update mesa. But the Linux kernel was also done quickly. - Mesa 17.1.2 (remove sanitizy check, otherwise fail to built) - Kernel 4.11.4 can be found at: http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/kernel/ http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/mesa/ Unfortunately still no time found to care about winehq. OK. My daughter plays under the same driver stack in manjaro linux World of Warcraft for hours and my Fedora in the business also runs stable over several days without failures. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/ Good night. Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On Fri, June 9, 2017 2:00 pm, Andrew Holway wrote: > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi > that > can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting > PXE. > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > device :) I don't know what your device's goal is, but you may think of running pfsense as a system on it: https://www.pfsense.org/download/ , and you should be able to add to it FreeBSD packages, between which you can find almost anything: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Installing_FreeBSD_Packages - just mentioning (much!) slimmer thing (once you mentioned "our bloaty friend"). Good luck! Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] using autofs on C-7
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Fred Smithwrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:58:25PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: >> > Your current setup does not agree with the instructions. May I suggest >> > you follow the example in the wiki exactly as it is written? If you >> > confirm that works, you can replace the name etc to fit your >> > situation. >> > >> > Akemi >> >> Akemi: >> >> thanks for the reply! >> >> I was struggling with the instructions because some things are not >> defined, and left to the reader to figure out. Not blaming you, all the >> other instructions I saw have the same issue. but if, for example, there >> was a clear statement of how/where the name of the local mount point >> was defined I might have gotten it right, but as it is I had to guess. >> >> But I'll go do what you suggest and see what happens. >> >> thanks again! >> > > OK, I've got it working, and Akemi's suggestion helped me figure it out. > > This is in /etc/auto.master: > > /mnt /etc/auto.mnt > > and this is in /etc/auto.mnt: > > # > # mounts public and home shares on the NasBox. > # > . syno-public > -fstype=cifs,rw,credentials=/root/.smbcred,defaults,uid=fredex,gid=fredex,noauto,users,exec,vers=3.0 > ://nasbox/public > > syno-fredex > -fstype=cifs,rw,credentials=/root/.smbcred,defaults,uid=fredex,gid=fredex,noauto,users,exec,vers=3.0 > ://nasbox/home > > trying to access /mnt/syno-fredex, then, mounts my home directory on the > Nasbox there, and access of /mnt/syno-public mounts the public share from > the Nasbox there. > > It all makes sense now. > > thanks Akemi! > > PS, would it be worth documenting the systemd automount feature in the > same wiki article? Glad to hear you've got it working. Sure, your contribution to the wiki article is much appreciated. :) Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
On Jun 9, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Michael Hennebrywrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Maybe we need another mailing list, like alt.religion.editors*, we could >> have alt.religion.systemd >> >> mark >> >> * vi, not emacs! Nya > > You mean 6, right? The developer of Sublime Text is hard at work on his third attempt at a Vi emulating plugin, apparently having run into walls with the prior two attempts. He is calling his latest attempt…Six. :) http://www.sublimesix.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Kenneth Porter wrote: Automounting is now done through systemd. Can be done through systemd, not has to be done via systemd. It'd be news to me that there's anything stopping you using autofs. I see no way to replicate most of the functionality of autofs with this. jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7
On Fri, June 9, 2017 2:56 am, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Kenneth Porter wrote: > >> Automounting is now done through systemd. > > Can be done through systemd, not has to be done via systemd. It'd be news > to > me that there's anything stopping you using autofs. Indeed. At least on one CentOS 7 box I set up mounting NFS via autofs (automounter) exactly the same way I was setting them up on CentOS 6, 5,... Didn't even think it might have to be done differently before reading this thread ;-) Valeri > > I see no way to replicate most of the functionality of autofs with this. > > jh Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Maybe we need another mailing list, like alt.religion.editors*, we could have alt.religion.systemd mark * vi, not emacs! Nya You mean 6, right? -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Fred Smithwrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:25:31AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> > Automounting is now done through systemd. >> >> In my use, we continue to use autofs for automounts of CIFS volumes, >> because as best I can tell, systemd doesn't support using the >> request-key infrastructure to use a user's kerberos ticket to set up >> the automount. > > Glad to know it still works. > > Could any of you look back at my first post and give me a hint > what I'm doing wrong? (I can repost if necessary.) Your current setup does not agree with the instructions. May I suggest you follow the example in the wiki exactly as it is written? If you confirm that works, you can replace the name etc to fit your situation. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:25:31AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > Automounting is now done through systemd. > > In my use, we continue to use autofs for automounts of CIFS volumes, > because as best I can tell, systemd doesn't support using the > request-key infrastructure to use a user's kerberos ticket to set up > the automount. Glad to know it still works. Could any of you look back at my first post and give me a hint what I'm doing wrong? (I can repost if necessary.) thanks! -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart." Hebrews 4:12 (niv) -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > Automounting is now done through systemd. In my use, we continue to use autofs for automounts of CIFS volumes, because as best I can tell, systemd doesn't support using the request-key infrastructure to use a user's kerberos ticket to set up the automount. -- Jonathan Billings___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:45:26AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Fred Smith >wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:25:31AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > >> > Automounting is now done through systemd. > >> > >> In my use, we continue to use autofs for automounts of CIFS volumes, > >> because as best I can tell, systemd doesn't support using the > >> request-key infrastructure to use a user's kerberos ticket to set up > >> the automount. > > > > Glad to know it still works. > > > > Could any of you look back at my first post and give me a hint > > what I'm doing wrong? (I can repost if necessary.) > > Your current setup does not agree with the instructions. May I suggest > you follow the example in the wiki exactly as it is written? If you > confirm that works, you can replace the name etc to fit your > situation. > > Akemi Akemi: thanks for the reply! I was struggling with the instructions because some things are not defined, and left to the reader to figure out. Not blaming you, all the other instructions I saw have the same issue. but if, for example, there was a clear statement of how/where the name of the local mount point was defined I might have gotten it right, but as it is I had to guess. But I'll go do what you suggest and see what happens. thanks again! -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us Do you not know? Have you not heard? The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He will not grow tired or weary, and his understanding no one can fathom. - Isaiah 40:28 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a device :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that > can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > device :) Raspberry Pi 3B 35 bucks notincluding power supply or SD card. the only thing I'm not sure of is the PXE part. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord is like a strong tower. Those who do what is right can run to him for safety. --- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] using autofs on C-7
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:58:25PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:45:26AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Fred Smith > >wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:25:31AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > >> > Automounting is now done through systemd. > > >> > > >> In my use, we continue to use autofs for automounts of CIFS volumes, > > >> because as best I can tell, systemd doesn't support using the > > >> request-key infrastructure to use a user's kerberos ticket to set up > > >> the automount. > > > > > > Glad to know it still works. > > > > > > Could any of you look back at my first post and give me a hint > > > what I'm doing wrong? (I can repost if necessary.) > > > > Your current setup does not agree with the instructions. May I suggest > > you follow the example in the wiki exactly as it is written? If you > > confirm that works, you can replace the name etc to fit your > > situation. > > > > Akemi > > Akemi: > > thanks for the reply! > > I was struggling with the instructions because some things are not > defined, and left to the reader to figure out. Not blaming you, all the > other instructions I saw have the same issue. but if, for example, there > was a clear statement of how/where the name of the local mount point > was defined I might have gotten it right, but as it is I had to guess. > > But I'll go do what you suggest and see what happens. > > thanks again! > OK, I've got it working, and Akemi's suggestion helped me figure it out. This is in /etc/auto.master: /mnt /etc/auto.mnt and this is in /etc/auto.mnt: # # mounts public and home shares on the NasBox. # . syno-public -fstype=cifs,rw,credentials=/root/.smbcred,defaults,uid=fredex,gid=fredex,noauto,users,exec,vers=3.0 ://nasbox/public syno-fredex -fstype=cifs,rw,credentials=/root/.smbcred,defaults,uid=fredex,gid=fredex,noauto,users,exec,vers=3.0 ://nasbox/home trying to access /mnt/syno-fredex, then, mounts my home directory on the Nasbox there, and access of /mnt/syno-public mounts the public share from the Nasbox there. It all makes sense now. thanks Akemi! PS, would it be worth documenting the systemd automount feature in the same wiki article? -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. --- Romans 5:8 (niv) -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter
On 6/9/2017 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a device:) Raspberry Pi 3B 35 bucks notincluding power supply or SD card. the only thing I'm not sure of is the PXE part. Pi 3 supports PXE over ethernet without using an SD card... I don't believe the older Pi's do, unless you put the PXE bootloader on an SD card. I usually figure a Pi costs $50 + SD card, as I like to put them in a case, and they do need a decent 2 amp MicroUSB PSU, you can get a case + wallwart for $15 on top of the $35 board cost. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos