Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:02 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Nov 21, 2007 9:31 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey > > Let's go live now. > > Akemi I Second the opinion of going live. let this baby be the new face of the wiki. Also fine tuning is an art and takes a life time ;) ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Nov 21, 2007 9:31 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Let's go live now. Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Nov 21, 2007 6:31 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really > lose screen estate at the top. > > How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a > 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the > moment. > > Or, if all of you want to have some more space above there (and the > background pattern) go with 1% padding? > > 1% padding means that there will be *1* line of checkered boxes over the > white space over the header ... > > [insert personal opinion: 1% padding looks better, IMHO, but other > people seem to like the 0% padding instead.] > > > Other than that, I'd like to call this the "Final Version" for now, with > which I'd like to go live on the real wiki before 5.1/4.6 hit the > mirrors. You have a go for me. Let's get this online. It is already a great improvement over the current one. And it would be great to get this going before the 5.1 release. > That doesn't mean that we won't improve the design any further, but I'd > like to show some progress to the outside (release early, release often) > ... Indeed, finetuning can be done over the coming days and weeks. Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the "microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds) ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 17:36 +, Lance Davis wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really > > lose screen estate at the top. > > > > How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a > > 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the > > moment. > > Looks fine - I would do the same at the sides as well. I am not sure. It is known from studies that people can only read optimally up to a certain text width. Not that a fixed size is enforced now, but the smaller relative width it has now, improves the readability of longer texts. *If* we want to fill up the sides, I think it is better to do that with menus or some other content in the future. -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really > lose screen estate at the top. > > How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a > 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the > moment. > > Or, if all of you want to have some more space above there (and the > background pattern) go with 1% padding? > > 1% padding means that there will be *1* line of checkered boxes over the > white space over the header ... > > [insert personal opinion: 1% padding looks better, IMHO, but other > people seem to like the 0% padding instead.] > > > Other than that, I'd like to call this the "Final Version" for now, with > which I'd like to go live on the real wiki before 5.1/4.6 hit the > mirrors. > > That doesn't mean that we won't improve the design any further, but I'd > like to show some progress to the outside (release early, release often) > ... I would bring it live right now and do the optimisations later. There is no need to get clearance of those things if most people already condoned most of the meat :) -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Hey, one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really lose screen estate at the top. How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the moment. Looks fine - I would do the same at the sides as well. Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
Hey, one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really lose screen estate at the top. How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the moment. Or, if all of you want to have some more space above there (and the background pattern) go with 1% padding? 1% padding means that there will be *1* line of checkered boxes over the white space over the header ... [insert personal opinion: 1% padding looks better, IMHO, but other people seem to like the 0% padding instead.] Other than that, I'd like to call this the "Final Version" for now, with which I'd like to go live on the real wiki before 5.1/4.6 hit the mirrors. That doesn't mean that we won't improve the design any further, but I'd like to show some progress to the outside (release early, release often) ... Cheers, Ralph pgpFJrg3suFQM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
