Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Am 02.04.11 15:15, schrieb Milos Blazevic:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2387594
Having said that, I would really appreciate if you could review the
article, got back to me with your findings, and if the content from this
source could find it's way into this fine Wiki article of yours :)
Does the license of that article allow that (I guess it could be
rewritten)? :)
I don't have a problem with the content (as dkms is available from
trusted repositories), so I'd have no problem with the inclusion either.
But yeah, maybe the main author of the article wants to chime in.
Ralph
___
Damn, you're 100% right, Ralph... This definitely is something that
should be taken into consideration. I really wouldn't like for this
suggestion to cause any
trouble to either CentOS Wiki or to Ozy... However, I sadly have to
admitt my knowledge is rather poor on this matter.
Hence, I'm hoping for someone with more experience in this legal stuff
to chime in.
(But then again, I really don't see the reason why would the Redmond
heretics mind - maybe not if the original article is pointed out as a
reference and source for some part of the CentOS Wiki article?)
Regards,
--
***Milos Blazevic*
RHCE Cert. No: 805010564450148
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
