Re: FLEX Questions
Flex Builder 2 Win or Mac $79.95 + free shipping. http://www.academicsuperstore.com/item/?tname=270585title=Flex+Builder It does require qualifications but there are several categories (student, teacher, staff, home school, etc) and they'll tell you what is required since it varies based on the Vendor. Definitely worth checking to see if you legitimately meet the criteria. Ken ~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 MX7 integration create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268925 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Problem with CFContent or CFHeader and https
Try temporarily turning off any cache-control that you may implemented to see if resolves the problem. That was it for me. MS has a page that explains it a bit more. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/815313/ Ken On 3/16/06, Michael Traher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks will try that On 3/16/06, Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Traher wrote: no sorry, its an extranet system tied down to ip addresses for access If you want to test yourself, the best thing to do is examine the headers. Use a IE plugin or try telnet: 1. Find a Unix machine 2. Open a SSL telnet connection to the server: telnet -z ssl server.domain.com 443 3. Request the document: GET /path/download.cfm?file=blah HTTP/1.1 Host: server.domain.com 4. Inspect the headers for any deviation from RFC 2616. Jochem ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:236405 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Using SQL Server JDBC Drivers with MX7?
Can you elaborate on the nature of this insert trigger bug or perhaps provide a pointer to descriptive info on it? Thanks, Ken On 11/7/05, Mike Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pete, I use the SQL Server JDBC drivers to get around a bug with insert triggers that is in the DataDirect 3.4 and 3.5 drivers. Otherwise, I was told that the DataDirect drivers are better. You can find setup instructions for the SQL Server drivers here: http://www.bpurcell.org/blog/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=981 The jTDS drivers are another option. http://jtds.sourceforge.net Enjoy, Mike Chabot On 11/5/05, Pete Ruckelshaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone using the Microsoft JDBC drivers for SQL Server with CFMX7? If so, are there any advantages in using the MS JDBC drivers over the ones that ship with MX? Followup question, when setting up an other type of DSN in CF Administrator, what do you use for the JDBC URL setting? I'll assume that the username and password are for the SQL Server account that is being used... Thanks Pete ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:223419 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Cumulative Hotfix 1 - Remove old Hotfixes?
Just curious if there's a recommended practice... I've previously applied the hf701-60827.jar and hf70161212.jar hotfixes. The new Cumulative hotfix 1 also includes these fixes. So what I'm wondering is if I should remove the two previous hotfix jar files...seems a bit redundant to have them fixed twice and included in the class path multiple times. After applying the cumulative hotfix the CF Admin System Info page still shows Update Level as being hf701-60827.jar even though all three jar files appear in the Java Class Path. It's easy enough to ignore the issue since it appears to work fine as is. I'm just curious if there's a specific technical reason to remove or not remove the earlier ones. Thanks, Ken ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:223426 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: bg myspace
Don't forget the t-shirt hanging in my closet... The #1 CFMX Website is Powered by BlueDragon The seem to have forgotten the asterisk with the kinda, sorta, patially, maybe someday all the way note at the bottom. :) The skirmish does seem to come down to matter of marketing vs reality...with reality lagging behind the image conveyed by the sales pitch. Lost in here somewhere is also the issue that CFMX was being criticized on at least one point (db drivers) without any information regarding what they did to try and resolve it beyond just leap to a different vendor. And, of course, the cowboy coder remarks are a direct result of the myspace.com presenters comments and tales of their development and (non)testing process and how the users liked it when the servers went down and the game came up. Some day marketing folks will get a clue and realize that trying to parse, spin and defend exaggerated claims after the fact doesn't work anymore. And attacking respected messengers only hurts them in the end. The politicians have ruined that for you...we're all too cynical to believe just anything thrown our way. Ken What about: 'The #1 CFML website is powered by CFML' 'Hear MySPace.com Tell their success story at Friday's Keynote' Do you remember what this is from? The banner hanging in the main CFUnited room all week. http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/23435256/ ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:215169 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Microsoft sponsoring CFUNITED-05
Reading it and, more importantly, knowing in detail exactly how it was conducted, by whom and for what purpose is required before placing much faith in studies of this sort. And statements, direct or otherwise, don't necessarily constitute fact...they are just that, statements. Statistics can be made to say most anything you want them to and surveys/polls are so easily biased as to be of marginal value other than as filler material for the companies that pay for them. Ken On 4/30/05, Daniel Ganter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do bear in mind that those percentages and facts only relate to those that responded to the survey...which doesn't necessarily indicate anything with regard to the IT industry overall. Ken Bear in mind, if we both are concerned with facts, we'd both have read the report.. And surely we've both have noted the following direct statement from Forrester, September 1, 2004, .NET Versus J2EE: .NET Has Clearly Arrived, by Randy Heffner: For results based on a randomly chosen sample of this size (n=322), there is 95% confidence that the results have a statistical precision of plus or minus 5.5% of what they would be if the entire population of North American enterprises had been polled. Thus, there is 95% confidence that the true proportion of firms that use .NET for the majority of their development is between 51% and 62%. Regards, Dan ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:205193 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Microsoft sponsoring CFUNITED-05
Do bear in mind that those percentages and facts only relate to those that responded to the survey...which doesn't necessarily indicate anything with regard to the IT industry overall. Ken ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:205168 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: I'm back! Which v7 to download?
Installing and Deploying ColdFusion MX 7 on Macintosh OS X http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/j2ee/cfmx7j2ee_mac_onjrunandtom.html On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:05:09 -0500, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question about the versions: I'm sitting here at the download screen looking at the Developer Version dropdown box: which one should I get? I'm on XP Pro, but there's a significant size difference between the windows and the J2EE version. What's required on the J2EE version and why the size difference? I'm running the plain jane Developer's version of 6.1. Unless you've already installed a J2EE server, you'll want to install the Windows version, which contains JRun. Also, which version should Mac users download? J2EE? Yes, I think so. In that case, I think you'll need to first install JRun or another J2EE application server. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193378 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: MX7 and MX6 side by side install
I've got CF5, 6.1 and 7 installed, each using it's own instance of Apache. Works great...no conflicts at all. Ken ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193429 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: cferror issue
I tried cfoutput/cfoutput and cferror caught it without fail. Perhaps something wrong in your error template causing it to fail? Ken On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:43:42 -0400, Robert Everland III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does cferror exception not catch an error like this cfoutput/cfoutput , it will just throw the error without being caught by cferror. Bob ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193025 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Beating a .net horse! Job interview confirms suspicions...
As Chris said, the Triad doesn't have much in the way of high-profile web design shops...just few wanna-be's that like to think they're big. Of those, most seem to tie their relevance to a Microsoft partnership that they purchased so they could put the logo on their website. In my experience they tend to contract out work when it involves CF rather than maintain staff skills to handle it. There are indeed plenty of companies in the Triad area that are users of ColdFusion. My employer currently has 23 developers doing CF work all day every day...make that 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. We like having plenty of time to enjoy all the benefits that the Triad area has to offer. But no, we're not hiring at the moment. Ken ~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:188799 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Prepared Statements in CFMX
Would that have something to do with the error I get if I run a query using cfqueryparam , make a slight change to database structure and then run the query again? If I remove the cfqueryparam it works fine and if I wait awhile before running the query again it does fine. Almost acts like it's caching info that is no longer correct following a slight change to the table. Ken On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 01:48:50 -0700, Paul Kenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, it does do the same thing. The only difference is that you use cfquery instead of using the JDBC API directly.In fact, if you use cfqueryparam, the database turns your query is turned into a prepared statement the first time it is called and sends back a handle to the JDBC driver.For all subsequent calls to that query, only the handle and the bound parameters are sent to the database--not the entire query. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: Prepared Statements in CFMX
As much as I hate SELECT * , I am using it in this case on some admin pages rather than code individual queries for each table...pure laziness.Never noticed that behavior under CF5 using ODBC. Thanks, Ken On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:13:29 -0400, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would that have something to do with the error I get if I run a query using cfqueryparam , make a slight change to database structure and then run the query again? If I remove the cfqueryparam it works fine and if I wait awhile before running the query again it does fine. Almost acts like it's caching info that is no longer correct following a slight change to the table. If you're using SELECT * within your query, I can see that happening. When you build a prepared statement, the database typically caches the execution plan for that statement. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ phone: 202-797-5496 fax: 202-797-5444 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: Port 51010 problem solved - RE: CFInstall fails Blocked port 51010
it was the fact that vet was updated and stopped this from installing What is vet? ken [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: OT:Free Mail Clients
Anyone know of any good free email clients? Thunderbird is a great option. While still under development, I've been using it for several months now without a single problem. http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ Ken [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: Free Mail Clients
1. You have to have separate mailboxes for each account (I have about 5 accounts, and for that matter Netscape has that issue to) Then you won't like Thunderbird either. Not entirely true with regard to Thunderbird. I didn't like that for a couple of minutes at first either. But then I realized that it was just a simple matter of adding a rule for all incoming mail to drop it into my local folders inbox...problem solved. Likewise, if you prefer to sort some mail into other folders (cf-talk, etc.) just add a rule for that like any other mail client and place the catchall filtering rule as the last to be applied. Ken [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II
things as fuse box, etc. really are not needed. How familiar are you with Mach II and things such as Fusebox? Have you actively used them yourself? Ken [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: CF Color coding tag?
There's one located here: http://www.cfcomet.com/utilities/ Ken John Beynon wrote: Where can I find the color coding tag that will render CF code on a page using colors like in Studio/DW? I've looked everywhere, DevEx, Google, cflib.org Thanks, John. ** Copyright ERA Technology Ltd. 2003. (www.era.co.uk). All rights reserved. The information supplied in this Commercial Communication should be treated in confidence. No liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss or damage suffered as a result of accessing this message or any attachments. ** [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: Macromedia launches Flex (Was Royale)
That was a good post. One thing, however, struck me as really odd. Third paragraph, last sentence, talking about building an event app... a full, professional product, the needs to be extremely high performance (think Dreamweaver or Flash). I think he must be using some super-secret never-released version of Dreamweaver if he sees it as being extremely high performance. :( Ken Mike Brunt wrote: There is a very good blog entry pointed out by Sean Corfield from David Mendels of Macromedia.It explains what Flex is and what the aims are.It compares Flex to the aims of MS's Longhorn. We will see or have seen the MS's Flash Killer-Sparkles BS this article is a good loin-girder to that line.ColdFusion is mentioned there and IMHO there is a great future in Flex and CF particularly for CF-ites who did not also want to become Flash-Timeline-Actionscript experts. http://weblogs.asp.net/jezell/posts/38319.aspx [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Might be easier to ask how many people are having serious problems with MX. Ken Boldacious Web Design wrote: What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user with problems with the server product, to uninstall it completely and revert to CF 5.0, until Macromedia gets its act together.While a lot was accomplished with the 6.1 release over previous editions, it still is not a stable product., and IMHO should not even be on the market. Seamus CampbellBoldacious WebDesign http://www.boldacious.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] ph 02 6297 4883fax02 6297 4883mob 0410 609 267 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re:Blue Dragon and Fusebox
For what it's worth, when I read Mike's post I intepreted it as a jestful comment about the competence of the technical professionals at that co-location facility together with a compliment about what a great job New Atlanta has done of building product recognition via your marketing and word-of-mouth. I read nothing negative towards New Atlanta in his comment. Ken Geez Mike... Wasn't sure if or how to respond. Each seem equally audacious: 1. Any statement that BlueDragon is the official upgrade version of ColdFusion Server 2. That such a statement could be related to any marketing message, literature or discussion by anyone directly affiliated with New Atlanta. 3. Supposing most people being honest without filtering the supposition through to the people at New Atlanta. Furthermore, how do any of these dubious statements relate to New Atlanta's marketing budget? I'm willing to let the question be rhetorical, and no, I thought none of it funny... for others may question our integrity based solely on your statements. I doubt your intent was malicious, but I feel compelled to respond on the record. Bottom line: New Atlanta is a clean, straight-shooting and professional organization. Regards, Dan Daniel Ganter New Atlanta Communications www.newatlanta.com [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: How can it be done ?
1) login occurs 2) id retrieved 3) write html page to disk on server with id field populated 4) generate fresh zip file containing the users customized html page and any other files needed 5) begin download 6) reboot occurs 7) load html page that was generated and included in zip Chris wrote: Good ideas, though cannot be done. The login occurs, the id is being retrieved, download started, reboot occurs and immediately (without login) a html-page is started containing a form with the ID filled out. The user does not have to login again. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: CreateUUID() / CreateGUID()
No response as to why it's happening but have you tried doing a cfset whatever = #CreateGUID()# and then using the whatever value in your cfprocparam? Ken -Original Message- From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CreateUUID() / CreateGUID() Any takers:-) -Original Message- From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:23 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CreateUUID() / CreateGUID() I am noticing something strange here and am hoping someone can enlighten me.. My form has a field called userId which is hidden and holds an MS formatted UUID (----). For now though, I am just testing out the form and tried setting the form value equal to CreateUUID, which uses the format (---). I set the form value equal to #CreateUUID# for testing purposes and it gets passed into my stored proc via the cfprocparam tag. cfprocparam type=In dbvarname=currentUserId null=no value=#form.currentUser# cfsqltype=CF_SQL_VARCHAR / When form.currentUser is equal to #CreateUUID()# the stored proc errors out. When form.currentUser is equal to #CreateGUID()# the stored proc errors out. When form.currentUser is equal to 4572039B-BDB5-255B-BBF5-1B752CEDD144 (MS format)the stored proc WORKS! Guess where I got that value? I viewed the source when I set the form field equal to #CreateGUID()# and copied it, then pasted it into the value of the currentUser form field! Can anyone explain why the stored procedure would accept the value when I manually set it to the value instead of calling the function to do it? CreateGUID() was obtained form cflib.org by the way. Thoughts??? Thanks, Mike _ [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: Another HomeSite+ Scripting Question
Oh that... Absolutely! I use it regularly and think it's great. Ken -Original Message- From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 11:51 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Another HomeSite+ Scripting Question The UDF Browser - it lets you browse CFLib via HomeSite/CFS. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: Another HomeSite+ Scripting Question
Which tool? -Original Message- From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 5:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Another HomeSite+ Scripting Question Just curious, how many people use this tool? [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
...this HTML cf-talk system
Firstly I HATE this HTML cf-talk system I don't want to deny anyone the choice of using html email but the option of turning it off needs to be fixed. Everytime I uncheck the html preference at houseoffusion.com it comes right back, never accepts that as my preference. When the uproar over this system first erupted I got the impression html email was going to be entirely optional. Has that been changed? And what's with every page load on the houseoffusion site trying to set a paypal cookie on my pc? Ken [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: ...this HTML cf-talk system
How about trying to turn it back on and then off again to see if it still works for you? I've been trying for several days and my choice is always ignored. Ken -Original Message- From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 10:26 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: ...this HTML cf-talk system I don't want to deny anyone the choice of using html email but the option of turning it off needs to be fixed. Everytime I uncheck the html preference at houseoffusion.com it comes right back, never accepts that as my preference. Strange, I turned off the HTML option within the first two or three days and have had no problems whatsoever. Nick [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: ...this HTML cf-talk system
I tried that one a couple of days ago and the messages just stopped completely. I'll give that another try. Perhaps the sudden lack of any messages arriving was due to something else and just coincided with my timing of that selection. Thanks, Ken -Original Message- From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 10:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: ...this HTML cf-talk system How about trying to turn it back on and then off again to see if it still works for you? I've been trying for several days and my choice is always ignored. Ah... just looked at it again... maybe I did something different ffrom you. I chose Text only email from the dropdown. I don't think the checkbox was there at the time. Nck [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: ...this HTML cf-talk system
Hmmm, thanks Angel. Thought I'd ask here first to see if anyone could point me to my obvious mistake first rather than bothering Michael. Given all the wonderfully helpful people on this list it's always good to use this resource first rather than everyone individually pounding Michael with messages. Thanks for you concern though. Ken -Original Message- From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 10:52 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: ...this HTML cf-talk system Hmm..perhaps you should follow the directions on the site and send an email to Michael telling him of the problem. Although I'm sure he'll catch this message, that would be amore direct method if you've found a bug. I , for one, love the fact that a few companies have signed on with HTML ads now! ^_^ -Gel -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 10:29 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: ...this HTML cf-talk system How about trying to turn it back on and then off again to see if it still works for you? I've been trying for several days and my choice is always ignored. Ken [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: (Admin) disclosure
Glad to hear they're interested. These lists contain a wealth of information that should serve them well if they listen with an open mind to what's being said and truly take it to heart. Ken -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:16 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: (Admin) disclosure I'm for full disclosure which is why I'm letting everyone here know that I'm giving a data dump of this and a few other lists to Macromedia so they can review what people are talking about in ColdFusion. This data will be used to enhance their ability to give us the features we want and address our concerns. I will be providing message bodies and subjects only. No user information, names, email addresses, message headers or other identifying information will be given. This is actually less information than is available in the public archives of this list. Michael Dinowitz Finding technical solutions to the problems you didn't know you had yet ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=i:4:137416 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: No so good news
Prior art found perhaps? http://www.ozzie.net/blog/stories/2003/09/12/savingTheBrowser.html -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 7:51 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: No so good news Jim Davis wrote: No problem. It's just that some people are taking this as an MS finally gets theirs situation when the ramifications are (unfortunately) really much larger than that. I'm waiting for the definition of browser to come up - any hyper-text system (CD ROM encyclopedias, help systems, computer assisted training, etc) may be affected by this. Any hypertext system capable of network operation is affected by it. The text of the patent is quite clear (and entertaining). I fully expect it to be thrown out in a higher court I don't. The only conceivable reason for it being thrown out is prior art. I fully expect Microsoft to be capable of finding that, so I presume it doesn't exist. What might happen is that a court orders Eolas to license the technology under non-discriminating conditions. But they should be willing to do so anyway, they don't compete with browser makers so selling/licensing the patent is the only way to make money from it. Jochem ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: Any way to get Homesite+ 5.5 without Dreamweaver?
If you own Studio MX you already have Homesite+ on the CD. Gotta dig down through the directories to find it, though, since MM prefers not to emphasize it. I didn't see anything new noted for Homesite+ that would warrant an upgrade. Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:47 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Any way to get Homesite+ 5.5 without Dreamweaver? I own Studio MX, but I don't want to pay the $200 for the DW upgrade just for Homesite+. Is there any other option? -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com
RE: Cracking the RDS protocol?
I can't imagine RDS would provide a better solution than ssh or scp. Perhaps not assuming ssh or scp are available options...which isn't always the case. RDS is quite handy for remote editing and the DB access is nice for quick stuff though sorely lacking compared to proper tools. Not sure how well it works via DWMX yet since I can't bear the performance of using that app. It works really well in Studio/Homesite+. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: More Client Variable Storage in DB - STILL Not Working
I haven't been following this thread so sorry if this has been asked/answered... Are you sure you've set the client storage location in the cfapplication tag i.e. clientstorage=YOUR_DSN_NAME Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: fusemail
Sure was...from e-zonemedia...the makers of FuseTalk. Now apparently known as FuseTalk, Inc. http://www.fusetalk.com/ Not sure whatever happened to FuseMail but it was pretty slick if you were committed to IE. Ken -Original Message- From: Critz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:16 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: fusemail oi CF-Talk,!! wasn't there a cf based product around called fusemail? Crit --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: RE: re: Mach-II
Oh my...perhaps you should surf around over at http://www.halhelms.com and get a little more familiar with who you're addressing your comments to. :) Ken -Original Message- From: Angus McFee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:09 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II Hal - I've heard from plenty of people looking for a way to beat up on Fusebox, but usually they have nothing to say when it comes to building a better framework. This is the first time in a long time anyone has suggested an alternative approach, and I really don't see how any of this benefits developers. This mach-ii stuff looks like just another petty attack on Fusebox. It's pretty clear we see things differently when it comes to building Web applications. I don't know you, but I can tell you are a pretty intelligent person, so you probably have some good reasons for why you don't like or hate fusebox. What I have to ask you is: do you use fusebox? Becuase there are plenty of people who are ready to attack it anytime and don't even know ColdFusion, much less what a framework is. You will probably never be convinced about the benefits of fusebox, all I can do is disagree with you, and point out all the great things fusebox does for developers: * it separates business logic from presentation logic, making for more organized, efficent code * it gives developers a common set of rules and methods to work from, so that everyone can understand what the other people are doing on a project regardless of the size of a team * it modularizes and encapsulates code, making it easier to reuse and thus to maintain * it is self-documenting, containing a complete, inline XML standard for documenting your applications * most importantly, there are thousands and thousands of fusebox developers out there, and more and more shops are choosing to use it every day. it is close to becoming a de-facto standard, which I doubt your mach-ii 'framework' will ever be able to match Angus McFee -Original Message- From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:16 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RE: re: Mach-II You're right, Dave. We're not looking to be able to incorporate Fusebox 3 (or 4) with Mach-II. We think that Fusebox is a great framework for procedural programmers. (Please, God, don't let this degenerate into yet another pro/con Fusebox debate...) Mach-II, though, is meant to be a pure OO framework. Fusebox and Mach-II have in common some good software engineering principles, but are very different things. I'm really referring to (a) backwards compatibility and (b) cross-language compatibility. Hal Helms Java for CF Programmers class in Las Vegas, August 18-22 www.halhelms.com - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Thinking about application architecture...
enable J2EE session variables and take advantage of the clustering and fail over capabilities of the underlying J2EE app server (e.g., CFMX for J2EE on JRun gives you session replication in real-time). Are these clustering and fail-over capabilities available if you are using the regular versions of CFMX rather than CFMX for J2EE? Using non-persistent session cookies is easily accomplished in CF5 and earlier. Any other benefit to J2EE session variables on CFMX versions other than CFMX for J2EE? Any info is appreciated. I keep hearing knowledgable MM-related folks pressing the benefits of the more expensive CFMX for J2EE and it leaves me wondering if going the route of the normal versions of CFMX has been a mistake in some way. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Anyone using Jakarta Struts for cfmx?
Dave Watts and I had been going back and forth on this framework question- of course he is a huge proponent of Fusebox in all its incarnations- Holy cow...was that the earth moving under my feet?!?! Did you say Dave Watts was a huge proponent of Fusebox? :) Since when? Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: legal issues
Better hire a lawyer to write one for you if the boss truly wants it to be as tight as possible. That overly broad statement you posted is just asking for an expensive legal battle down the road...assuming you could pursuade anyone to sign something that broad to start with. Ken -Original Message- From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 2:47 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: legal issues Yeah, that's what I've been gathering, but the boss says they need one, and I'd rather do a bit of work now than potentially get into a battle down the road. Load of bureaucratic BS, but such is life. --- Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer AudienceCentral [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice : 360.756.8080 x12 fax : 360.647.5351 www.audiencecentral.com -Original Message- From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:39 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: legal issues Not sure about the legal situation in the US, but in Canada most lawyers will tell ya non-compete agreements are just expensive pieces of paper...easily fought if need bejust too many ways of reading them...too many gray areas Cheers Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. t. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Macromedia Associate Partner www.macromedia.com - Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group Founder Director www.cfug-vancouverisland.com - Original Message - From: Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:21 AM Subject: legal issues My company recently spawned off from a parent company, and we're drafting a non-compete agreement and looking for some insight as to wording. We found a couple generic agreements, and they used such remarkably vague terms as ... the Employee shall not own, manage, operate, consult to or be employed in a business substantially similar to the present or future business of the Company ... I don't have a particular problem with signing an appropriate non-compete, and my employer wants to ensure the agreement is suitable for all concerned, which is very nice, so there is some flexability. The company develops a web-based communications management tool that is licensed and hosted ASP-style (Application Service Provider, not Active Server Pages ;). As well as doing all development, we do all the sales and support services. My concern is that any web app could be construed as a web-based communications management tool, especially anything that's not a basic web site (an email newsletter with web-based authoring, for example), so the definition of competition needs a fairly high degree of precision. I'm sure there are people out there who've fought this battle before, and I was wondering if any of you had some insight, or even some sample language. thanks, barneyb --- Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer AudienceCentral [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice : 360.756.8080 x12 fax : 360.647.5351 www.audiencecentral.com --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/2003 ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Multiple Statements in a cfquery with mySQL
I do believe it depends on what you are doing in the SQL statements. As long as you are only bringing back one recordset it should not be a problem. -Original Message- From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 6:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Multiple Statements in a cfquery with mySQL Just a quickie, Running multiple statements at once works fine in mySQL, but not from a cfquery (cf5), I assume it's an ODBC driver issue, or is it cf? Anyone know for sure? Craig Dudley Senior Developer Netstep Corporate Communications Ltd Direct Line: +44(0) 1422 319712 Phone: +44(0) 1422 200308 Fax: +44(0) 1422 200306 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MS Messanger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www: www.netstep.co.uk ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF Compatability
By new implementers do you mean someone who would be competing against MM for server sales? Ken -Original Message- From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 3:23 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF Compatability Among others, Introducing the technology to new implementers, provide a pathway for a start up to build experience and follow an upgrade path that will be profitable. == Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 == If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 12:41 PM Subject: CF Compatability | What's the incentive to give away CF, the test suites or the language to New Atalnta and others? | | ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
So all this time the OS that Mike's folks were having trouble installing to was Windows 2003? Ken -Original Message- From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 12:58 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ... See what happens when an expert makes himself available? Message just received from Jochem: Installer runs just fine and CF MX too. Also no problems with the updater. But when shutting down IIS in order to apply the connectors, FTP service hung. I ran the connectors anyway. You might need to do some legwork to fix some IIS issues, because I installed it in the default website which turned out to be disabled. But http://localhost:8500/cfide/administrator/index.cfm works. I used the installation script from http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/install_cf_win2003 .htm Jochem == Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 == If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
So was it Windows 2003 that Mike was having problems with all this time? Just curious since I had not seen that critical fact mentioned in the thread whereas NT and 2000 were both referenced during various responses. Ken -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 3:18 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ... Ken Wilson wrote: So all this time the OS that Mike's folks were having trouble installing to was Windows 2003? Mike was not the only one having install problems, Doug has had his share too. Jochem ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: remote installation - WAS Macromedia's support attention ...
Thanks for the detailed update Doug...good info for us all to have. Ken -Original Message- From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 5:42 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: remote installation - WAS Macromedia's support attention ... I believe it was a Win2k server Mike's provider was having problems with. I originally had problems with Win2k, and abandoned that, and got a new server and installed Win 2003 - This is the one that Jochem installed CFMXPro on, as a stand alone. I was getting the freeze up when installing the updater. First, I changed the compatibility settings on the install files to force compatibility with Win2000 SP3. Then Jochem installed CFMXPro as a standalone, then the updater3, and lastly we do the jumping through hoops to do the registry hacks, editing the config files, mapping the jrun connectors, adding ColdFusion services, and configuring for a multi-homed (several web sites) server. You know, all the stuff I was griping about before LOL After this is the Anti-virus program, the firewall, etc. The install procedure followed is: (plus a few additional steps omitted from the instructions.) http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/install_cf_win2003 .htm Once up and running solid, I will publish step-by-step instructions. It seems that the order of installation of modules vs, hacks, is very critical to success. Importantly is that Jochem got me past the server freeze-up I had been experiencing. In order to access ColdFusion Administrator, the default web site must be running, which is not a problem, as I can turn it off when not using CF administrator. Now to get a CFMX web site on there for testing. The saga continues. == Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 == If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! - Original Message - From: Ken Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 3:49 PM Subject: RE: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ... | So was it Windows 2003 that Mike was having problems with all this time? | Just curious since I had not seen that critical fact mentioned in the thread | whereas NT and 2000 were both referenced during various responses. | | Ken | | | -Original Message- | From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 3:18 PM | To: CF-Talk | Subject: Re: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with | Macromedia's support attention ... | | | Ken Wilson wrote: | So all this time the OS that Mike's folks were having trouble installing | to | was Windows 2003? | | Mike was not the only one having install problems, Doug has had his | share too. | | Jochem | | | | ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Host with the leader in ColdFusion hosting. Voted #1 ColdFusion host by CF Developers. Offering shared and dedicated hosting options. www.cfxhosting.com/default.cfm?redirect=10481 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Insert and update ? For new CF server
If you do not use cfinsert and cfupdate, what tags are there to make it work. Have you tried your basic cfquery with insert/update statements? ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
I had to find a hosting company with a business deal that worked with my business Does that, perchance, equate to being a cheap hosting company? And, if so, are you now getting exactly what you've paid for? MM has no control whatsoever over the installation conditions or technical competence of those who claim to be hosting providers. Perhaps your public anger is better directed at the hosting company rather than the one who sells a product that has proven itself (at least in other hands) to be quite capable. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Host with the leader in ColdFusion hosting. Voted #1 ColdFusion host by CF Developers. Offering shared and dedicated hosting options. www.cfxhosting.com/default.cfm?redirect=10481 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
even if many of the flock know not whereof they speak. Amusing comment coming from someone who apparently can't get it running directed at those who have done so repeatedly. :) Good luck to you. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF Dev Journal Heaviest Advertiser Awards.
Another category needs to be added. Most Annoying Website Advertising And the winner is... http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/ for all it's annoying pop-ups and frame-based advertising panels. ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF5 Studio
If you have Dreamweaver MX then you already have it...now called Homesite+. If you don't have Dreamweaver MX then buy it just to get Homesite+ since it's cheaper to buy them both than it was to buy CF Studio alone. Ken -Original Message- From: W Luke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:30 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF5 Studio Is CF5 studio still purchasable? I'm still using my old CF4 version, and have lost my copy of CF5 and the serial. I much prefer studio to Dreamweaver MX. Is it possible to use the serial I received when I bought CF4 studio to upgrade to CF5, or has CF5 been completely discontinued? Will ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: cf color selector?
Something like this? http://www.mattkruse.com/javascript/colorpicker/ -Original Message- From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 12:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cf color selector? Any of you gurus have a cf color selector tag or an equivalent idea? I need to give a client the ability to select a few colors. A pop up, selectable, color chart is what I'm after, preferably a 256 color chart. I found one for sale on Macromedia Exchange but the links are dead so I guess that's out. Thanks for any guidance. cc ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Another Challenging question
Wouldn't you want to make that Login.RecordCount EQ 1. If you get more than one record back you've clearly allowed duplicate user records and need to take some action to correct that problem. -Original Message- From: Kazmierczak, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:27 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Another Challenging question You might want to switch your cfif statement. I think it is backwards. If the recordcount is greater or equal to one that's a valid login, else if it is zero, it was an invalid login. Like: cfif Login.RecordCount IS 0 cflocation url=invalidlogin.cfm? cfelseif Login.RecordCount IS GTE 1 cflocation url=validlogin.cfm? /cfif --- Kevin Kazmierczak, CCNA Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer Alfred University Alumni Hall 607-871-2334 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sangeeta Karmokar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:12 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Another Challenging question I am not sure how to add a new thread. So I am posting this message here.. I am a new user of CFMX and I am creating Login and Password page with Access as Database. CAn anyone check as this CF script is ok: cfquery name=Login datasource=Users SELECT * FROM Login WHERE Usr_Name = #form.Usr_Name# AND Usr_Password = #form.Usr_Password# /cfquery cfif Login.RecordCount IS 0 cflocation url=validlogin.cfm? cfelseif Login.RecordCount IS GTE 1 cflocation url=invalidlogin.cfm? cfelse /cfif !--end login_action.cfm-- Where Users is my datasource and Urs_Name and Urs_Password is my field names. Please can anyone help me. Sangeeta ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: MSDE on Office XP CD - where is Enterprise Manager?
look around see if you have a sql server license someplace. And if not, get a trial CD of SQL Server from MS and install the tools from there. ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Macromedia.Com (The new site?)
cliff is actually penning some notes for it as well :) Yeah, he refers to them as CF-Talk. ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Homesite+ Question
I do believe that was the major impact of the Adobe litigation. That's also why I uninstalled Hoemsite+ in favor of CF Studio v5. While some dismiss the issue as minor, it's major annoyance for me. Not sure what the terms of the settlement were but it sure would be nice if the two had decided to put customers first rather than their own egos. Ken -Original Message- From: Venable, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:21 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Homesite+ Question Hello, Just got a new XP machine and went ahead and installed MX Studio with Homesite+. I'm trying to set it up like I used to have my CF Studio set up, but I have two strange issues I can't figure out. 1) Under options settings resource tab preferences Lock Tabs is enabled but dimmed meaning I can't unlock tabs to get rid of some of them 2) Similar problem with trying to customize visible toolbars. The checkbox next to each toolbar will not let me uncheck it. Anyone have any idea why this might be? Thanks John Venable ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Homesite+ Question
Download and install the 5.2 updater and you will be able to disable the tabs. Well now that's good news. Does that include the full capability of CF Studio i.e. can you add buttons and create custom toolbars? Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF5 XML :)
A few links that might get you started: http://torchbox.com/xml/ http://www.cfdev.com/xml/ No doubt others will point you to more. Ken -Original Message- From: Pablo Varando [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 7:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF5 XML :) I've never really worked with XML in CF 5 before and I have a client that needs something done in CF 5 with XML feeds. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Maybe a tutorial or something like that? TIA Pablo ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: HOF site staff
Left side menu has this link. Used it myself a couple of days ago and it sent both UserName and Password to me just fine. http://www.houseoffusion.com/signin/index.cfm?method=password -Original Message- From: Cutter (CF_Talk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:55 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: HOF site staff I'm trying to change my email address for this list. I have forgotten my un/pw, and there does not appear to be a email me my info setting on HOF. Help! Cutter ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: FBX3 AND CFMX
I think the reason that people make so many variations of Fusebox is because they are constantly finding limitations. Or you could rephrase that in a somewhat more positive light rather than a negative one: One of the reasons you find so many variations of Fusebox is because creative developers are constantly extending it to perform functions beyond what the core framework was designed to include. That's a lot of what I've seen over the years. I'm not sure I'd consider adding additional features to be a reflection of an existing limitation unless you take the position that a core framework should include the weight of every conceivable desire including 3 styles of kitchen sinks. That doesn't necessarily make it easier to follow the modified framework when you first run into it. If the developer made serious changes to the core framework code rather than adding those functions as an optional add-on and/or failed to properly document the mods, then it can definitely be a pain. But I'd submit that's more a reflection on that developer rather than the core framework itself. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released!
Will be interesting to see what kind of traction BlueDragon gets in the marketplace. And if it suceeds, what kind of pricing pressure this puts on MM. And one could argue that if it causes sufficient pricing pressure, MM might have to respond in a way that reduces their revenue and therefore cash available for future enhancements to CF. Ken -Original Message- From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:54 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released! This finally kills dead all of that php/asp 'but its free' garbage, which never had any validity in the first place. All sorts of implications here. Sure would like to see a lot of new cfml developers enter the world as we know it. Interesting times :) Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com -Original Message- From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 6:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released! Yes, absolutely it extends to a production box. You may use the BlueDragon Server free edition however you want, for no charge. The only thing you can't do is redistribute it--for that you'll need an OEM/VAR agreement (pricing will be very reasonable, or even free depending on what you want to do). Vince Bonfanti New Atlanta Communications, LLC http://www.newatlanta.com -Original Message- From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:27 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: FREE BlueDragon Server Released! Wow. The 'free' part doesn't extend to a production box, right? Not sure about the definition of 'deployment'. Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: FBX3 AND CFMX
Did you start CF with FB or pickup FB along the way? Picked it up along the way several years ago before there was any such thing as version numbering with FB. I've not moved over to FB3 yet and personally never much bought into the notion of the thou shalt and thou shalt not aspect of the methodology. I use significant parts of it where appropriate, use my own in other places and have yet to encounter anything I would consider a limitation imposed by FB. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF - PHP comparisons?
Vince, Have you had opportunity yet to review/consider the implications of Microsoft's patent efforts on .NET and how they will impact BlueDragon for .NET? Just curious what your take on all that is. Ken -Original Message- From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:20 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF - PHP comparisons? Hi Mike, I tend to agree with your comments regarding the richness of PHP. If you do a straight comparison of PHP and CFML's built-in functions then they seem pretty equal. However, one thing that's changed in the CFML world with the introduction of CFMX and BlueDragon is that you now have seamless access to the full set of Java APIs from CFML. With the release of BlueDragon for .NET you'll similarly have seamless access to the full .NET Framework (APIs) from within CFML. In effect, the set of CFML functions is being expanded to include all of the Java APIs or all of the .NET APIs, depending on which platform you prefer. It seems to me that since PHP is not built on either of the two major platform technologies (Java or .NET), it's richness is going to suffer in comparison as CFML developers learn to take advantage of the integration with Java and .NET. Also, look at the way CFMX leveraged the Java platform to implement web services support (via Apache Axis). PHP is not going to be able to take advantage of the underlying platform technology the way CFMX did; instead they're going to have to implement their own solution from scratch. It seems to me that this will be a major disadvantage of PHP. Vince Bonfanti New Atlanta Communications, LLC http://www.newatlanta.com -Original Message- From: Mike Alberts [mailto:m_alberts@ . ] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:33 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF - PHP comparisons? Since I develop with both CF and php, I guess I'll add my .02... Also respectfully to you Dave, this is NOT a terrible comparison. With the exception of the part about user defined functions, the comparison seems pretty valid to me, even though it is quite old. In addition, php has made great strides in the last couple of years: There are at least 3 very good IDE's for php (Zend Studio, Nusphere PhpEd and Activestate Komodo), as well as some decent simple code editors (php coder/Maguma Studio, etc. Zend has done some other great things for php, like code encryption, acceleration, caching, etc. Granted these products are not free, but their new 'Small Business Program' lets you get all of that stuff with the IDE for a $295 lifetime payment. This is an absolute bargain. Now I still love the CF language, and it's what I prefer to code in, for its ability to let me get projects done quickly. But over the years of using CF I've developed my own 'methodology', that implements the Application Framework, as well as some other ways of doing things that are sort of like Fusebox (only simpler). I've personally found that I can use this same framework in php as well, and the only thing that changes is the syntax of the language. Many things in php (switch/case for example) are almost identical in both languages (using the CF version with cfscript tags of course). And don't think that php isn't 'rich'. More than once I've sat down to write a function in php and realized part way through that there was already a built in function to accomplish the task. To me, it all boils down to what Sean said both languages have their strengths and weaknesses. Use the right tool for the task at hand. I'm not even going to comment on ASP (ugh), but php is a fine tool in its own right and even though it does take longer to develop with than CF (for me), it still allows me to do some cool stuff for clients, which makes them (and me) happy. ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Using CF to pull content from with div tags for printing
Does it have to be in a pop-up window for some reason or can you just use existing CSS functionality to control what gets printed? Ken -Original Message- From: Jason Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:43 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Using CF to pull content from with div tags for printing Hello list - I have been messing with this- but I do not know how to complete a few aspects. I would like to control printing from a webpage that heavily uses CSS styles and positioning for layers. What I would like to do is supply a print button - on click - it would launch a 2nd window - and tag all the content from within a div tag OR a custom tag I put in like... !-- Grab content starting here -- !-- Grab content End here -- So I would use CF to grab all text within that section ( and it's styles ) and dynamically write that to a printed page that has a special high quality logo, address and header information. Any help is GREATLY appreciated. The long route I can replace all content with an include template - and completely seperate content from html tags - BUT that would require a fair amount of work on the site AND there are cases where due to formating - I can't include all content on 1 include file. But IF I could use this - it would be great - because the pop up template would have a header and a footer - with the content include in the middle - so that should give the picture. Thanks!! ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Using CF to pull content from with div tags for printing
That sounds like quite a lot of work. Why not provide page that works for both monitor and printer? http://www.alistapart.com/stories/goingtoprint/ Not sure if they address anything that Eric's article doesn't, but here's a couple of other articles I had bookmarked from Evolt: Kissing Print Versions of Pages Goodbye http://www.evolt.org/article/Kissing_Print_Versions_of_Pages_Goodbye/20/ 5/index.html Printing with style http://www.evolt.org/article/Printing_with_style/17/26318/index.html ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RDS/Database views timeout under CFMX
Wondering if anyone might suggest a solution or direction to look in solving a problem. When trying to expand the database tables list in the CF Studio database tab we're getting a timeout error after about 30 seconds. The specific error is: The database objects could not be retrieved due to an error: Error -1 occured: The operation timed out. The problem does not appear when accessing the database via CF5 Server, only via CFMX. This particular database has a huge number of tables in it so I'm guessing there must be a timeout setting somewhere in CFMX that is controlling it. Smaller databases do not exhibit the problem. The timeout that is kicking in is significantly shorter than the timemout set in the DSN panel in CF Admin so I'm thinking this timeout is being controlled elsewhere. Has anyone seen and solved this problem already? Any ideas where I might start a search...other than MM support. Not trying to shun them, just prefer to investigate it a bit before whipping out my CC. :) Any suggestions appreciated. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: RDS/Database views timeout under CFMX
Nope, had not seen that tech note...thanks! Ken -Original Message- From: Debbie Dickerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:07 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RDS/Database views timeout under CFMX Have you tried the recommendation from this TechNote? http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=22293Method=Full Deb -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:57 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RDS/Database views timeout under CFMX Wondering if anyone might suggest a solution or direction to look in solving a problem. When trying to expand the database tables list in the CF Studio database tab we're getting a timeout error after about 30 seconds. The specific error is: The database objects could not be retrieved due to an error: Error -1 occured: The operation timed out. The problem does not appear when accessing the database via CF5 Server, only via CFMX. This particular database has a huge number of tables in it so I'm guessing there must be a timeout setting somewhere in CFMX that is controlling it. Smaller databases do not exhibit the problem. The timeout that is kicking in is significantly shorter than the timemout set in the DSN panel in CF Admin so I'm thinking this timeout is being controlled elsewhere. Has anyone seen and solved this problem already? Any ideas where I might start a search...other than MM support. Not trying to shun them, just prefer to investigate it a bit before whipping out my CC. :) Any suggestions appreciated. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Best way to store 40 values?
it'll certainly confuse the hell out of fusebox. Huh? You'll ultimately regret storing it as a string rather using the DB as intended, but Fusebox won't have any more trouble with it than a non-Fusebox app. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: SecretAgents.com Tutorials
Send an email to Steve Nelson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's his site so he should be able to get things straightened out for you. Ken -Original Message- From: Cutter (CF_Talk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:26 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: SecretAgents.com Tutorials So, I started these tutorials to teach me how to do a hierarchy menu using nested data sets. I really wanted to learn this so that I could begin creating my HM_Array.js files dynamically. The first 3 tutorials were free, the last 3 (which give you the important details) required a subscription. So I go to my company to get a subscription. They finally approve it and it is sitting on the CFO's desk waiting to be processed. So I go to the site to review the 1st 3 tutorials... But now the site is not the same site. Oh, it has the same logo, the same URL, but now it's a site to submit jobs to be done, or for a developer to take a fuse. Anybody know how I can get what I need? Cutter ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief
In scanning through it one question pops to mind. On page 7 it states that trusted cache was enabled on both CFMX Enterprise and CFMX for JRun but it does not state that it was turned on for CF5. Wouldn't that tend to skew the results in favor of the CFMX flavors from the outset? Right after the release of CFMX I seem to recall some folks discussing that file system access was noticeably slower under CFMX (particularly to Fusebox folks with lots of cfincludes) which makes me wonder what a more equivalent comparison between CF5 and CFMX would reflect. Ken -Original Message- From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief There's a new performance brief on DesDev for CFMX. It seems CFMX for J2EE on Linux smokes all other platforms...and is even more impressive when compared to CF5 on Linux...now I wonder what the metrics would look like on RedHat Advanced server using BEA's JRockit JVM (although not supported) !! Or better yet, CMFX for BEA running on RH AS! Another 10-25% gain? http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/mx/coldfusion/whitepapers/cfmx_jrun_per f_brief.pdf ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: INPUT = FILE
You can apply it to the input tag itself. input type=FILE name=NAME class=CLASSNAME style=STYLE_DETAILS -Original Message- From: Randell B Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 12:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: INPUT = FILE Is there anyway to assign a class file to the BROWSE button on an input type of FILE? Maybe you can and I am just not with it today to find out how. Thanks!! ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
RE: Session Variables (was Login/Password screen)
Tracking failed logon attempts to IP address. But that dictates that everyone has a unique IP address which is frequently not the case in one of my current apps. If you rely on IP, you're subjecting all other users with the same IP to being locked out. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
RE: Session Variables (was Login/Password screen)
Once a valid User ID has been entered, track unsuccessful attempts Ahh, helps to read and comprehend your idea to it's conclusion...nevermind. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
RE: Updater 2 released
Is it just me or does the Updater download link fail for everyone? It just points to a directory which then routes me back to MM homepage. Ken -Original Message- From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Updater 2 released Hi, Just got a note from macromedia that the Updater 2 has gone final. I've been testing the release candidates the past week, and must say thet it's working fine and stable. More info at: http://dynamic.macromedia.com/bin/MM/software/trial/hwswrec.jsp?product=cfmx _updater Greetings, Jesse Houwing ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: Updater 2 released
Nope, it is asking if I'd like to be notified of future releases but never asks me to login or offers a place to enter an email for those notifications. Then goes to the page of download links which all just point to directories and redirects back to homepage. Ken -Original Message- From: Debbie Dickerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:12 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Updater 2 released What's the URL you're going to? It's not taking you to the page to log in using your Macromedia ID? Deb -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:07 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Updater 2 released Is it just me or does the Updater download link fail for everyone? It just points to a directory which then routes me back to MM homepage. Ken -Original Message- From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Updater 2 released Hi, Just got a note from macromedia that the Updater 2 has gone final. I've been testing the release candidates the past week, and must say thet it's working fine and stable. More info at: http://dynamic.macromedia.com/bin/MM/software/trial/hwswrec.jsp?product=cfmx _updater Greetings, Jesse Houwing ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
RE: Updater 2 released
I went in via Homepage - Support - ColdFusion - Downloads - Updaters - ColdFusion MX Updater Ken -Original Message- From: Debbie Dickerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:12 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Updater 2 released What's the URL you're going to? It's not taking you to the page to log in using your Macromedia ID? Deb -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:07 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Updater 2 released Is it just me or does the Updater download link fail for everyone? It just points to a directory which then routes me back to MM homepage. Ken -Original Message- From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Updater 2 released Hi, Just got a note from macromedia that the Updater 2 has gone final. I've been testing the release candidates the past week, and must say thet it's working fine and stable. More info at: http://dynamic.macromedia.com/bin/MM/software/trial/hwswrec.jsp?product=cfmx _updater Greetings, Jesse Houwing ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
RE: Updater 2 released
OK, deleting existing cookies worked but only after I told ZoneAlarm to let you set another cookie. Thanks, Ken -Original Message- From: Debbie Dickerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Updater 2 released Try deleting your cookie for our site. There were some changes to the sequence of pages for the Updater, specifically to move the notification option to it's own page rather than having it on the same page as the login. Since you're going directly to the notification page, you must have chosen the Remember Me option at some point. Maybe there's a conflict with the old info. Deb -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Updater 2 released I went in via Homepage - Support - ColdFusion - Downloads - Updaters - ColdFusion MX Updater Ken -Original Message- From: Debbie Dickerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:12 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Updater 2 released What's the URL you're going to? It's not taking you to the page to log in using your Macromedia ID? Deb -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:07 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Updater 2 released Is it just me or does the Updater download link fail for everyone? It just points to a directory which then routes me back to MM homepage. Ken -Original Message- From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Updater 2 released Hi, Just got a note from macromedia that the Updater 2 has gone final. I've been testing the release candidates the past week, and must say thet it's working fine and stable. More info at: http://dynamic.macromedia.com/bin/MM/software/trial/hwswrec.jsp?product=cfmx _updater Greetings, Jesse Houwing ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
RE: Macromedia Contribute
then why do they need to pay you for a content management system? Perhaps so he can continue to pay his kids tuition bill, the mortgage or buy groceries? :) Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: RDS and VSS
Last time I investigated it Projects would not work via RDS, only local and mapped drives. If you do find a way to make it work please do share. I could use that capability right now. Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:27 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RDS and VSS I work remotely for my company and connect to our development servers via VPN. I am using ColdFusion Studio version 5 because there are bugs that I have reported in Dreamweaver MX, specific to rewriting my code upon save. Although my connection to my home office is over high speed (cable), using RDS is much faster than using UNC paths (e.g. \\servername\sharename). Recently, I have started on a new project and am collaborating with two developers in the home office. We need to use Visual Source Safe so we don't step on each other's changes to the source code. I have configured a PROJECT in CF Studio 5 and set the Location of Project File to rds://scsdb01/E:\webdev_root/oesv2/webroot. The project creates just fine. Now, when I right click on the project that I created and select Source Control...Map Project to Source Control... My VSS client pops up, I log in and then select the VSS project that I wish the CF Studio project to use. As soon as I do this, Visual Source Safe pops up an error that says: Invalid DOS path: rds://scsdb01/E:\webdev_root/OESv2/webroot What I suspect is happening here is that VSS doesn't understand RDS and is using the working path specified in CF Studio. I am wondering though if any gurus out there have any idea on ways to work around this unfortunate problem. Thank you, Grant Szabo - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
RE: sum values in list
Why not just return the totals as a part of your query? Let the database do it's job. Ken -Original Message- From: Smith, Matthew P -CONT(DYN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 1:13 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: sum values in list Thanks, Mike. It works(sorta). Below is my original code: cfloop query=qry_licenseInfo cfif len(qry_licenseInfo.softwareUsers) cfset variables.totalSoftwareUsers = variables.totalSoftwareUsers + val(qry_licenseInfo.softwareUsers) /cfif cfif len(qry_licenseInfo.softwareUsers) cfset variables.totalCurrentLicenses = variables.totalSoftwareUsers + val(qry_licenseInfo.currentLicenses) /cfif cfif len(qry_licenseInfo.softwareUsers) cfset variables.totalRequiredLicenses = variables.totalSoftwareUsers + val(qry_licenseInfo.requiredLicenses) /cfif cfif len(qry_licenseInfo.softwareUsers) cfset variables.totalRequiredUpgrades = variables.totalSoftwareUsers + val(qry_licenseInfo.requiredUpgrades) /cfif /cfloop Here's what I did with your suggestion: cfset variables.totalSoftwareUsers = arraySum(listToArray(valueList(qry_licenseInfo.softwareUsers))) cfset variables.totalCurrentLicenses = arraySum(listToArray(valueList(qry_licenseInfo.currentLicenses))) cfset variables.totalRequiredLicenses = arraySum(listToArray(valueList(qry_licenseInfo.requiredLicenses))) cfset variables.totalRequiredUpgrades = arraySum(listToArray(valueList(qry_licenseInfo.requiredUpgrades))) However, I've run into a snag. The query I'm working with is returning empty strings for some of the records. When this occurs, I am getting this for output: Total Software Users: 2.12453679578E-314 Is there something I can tweak? The single cfset is much more economical overhead wise, but I'm not sure what to change to get a 0 when nothing but empty strings are contained in the result set for each aggregate list. Thanks again for the help! Matthew P. Smith Web Developer, Object Oriented Naval Education Training Professional Development Technology Center (NETPDTC) (850)452-1001 ext. 1245 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mike Townend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 12:01 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: sum values in list Try #ArraySum(ListToArray(myList))# HTH -Original Message- From: Smith, Matthew P -CONT(DYN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 17:56 To: CF-Talk Subject: sum values in list I have a comma delimited list of integer values. Is there a cf function that will add all the values together? Or do I have to loop through the list adding each value to get the sum? Matthew P. Smith Web Developer, Object Oriented Naval Education Training Professional Development Technology Center (NETPDTC) (850)452-1001 ext. 1245 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
RE: temp variable storage?
What dictates that the first form can't be written to the DB as soon as they submit it? Ken -Original Message- From: Brian Scandale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 1:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: temp variable storage? I have a large form (around 100 text boxes and check boxes etc...). Once the user submits it they still need to navigate about 6 more forms before the data can be written to a database. How do I go about storing the form data temporarily until I can write it to disk? I suspect there are more than one ways that you all are doing this. Thanks for a few clues. Brian ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: Anyone have experience in writing Postscript files from CF?
but after acquiring a more CF-friendly Java class it was easy to use What was the more CF-friendly Java class that you acquired? Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
RE: _date bug in CF5.0, possibly CFMX as well
One of our developers here just encountered a situation today where he was using _date in a text field name but had no hidden fields as mentioned that you would expect to trigger the server-side validation. Nontheless, the error message was thrown suggesting server-side validation had taken place. I've not had time to dig into the issue yet but something odd is definitely happening. Ken -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:57 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: _date bug in CF5.0, possibly CFMX as well Long time ago, I found form field suffix with _date would be ignored/unrecognized by CF5.0 either using regular FORM submit or CFFORM submit. I may be caused by the CFFORM's date type validation and unwittingly extended to FORM as well. I let it slip for guessing other people would come cross it as well and report it, then, Macromedia would issue a patch to fix it. So far, I'ven't heard of such a patch. No workaround, some database column ends with _date, e.g. OrderEntry_Date, which is totally normal and common, and one is not supposed to change a given database's structure, some one argues that a column name should not contain _ (underscore), I think that's nonsense, it does not break any normalization rules. Folks, correct me, if I'm wrong. This isn't a bug, and doesn't have anything to do with CFFORM validation. Within any HTML form, there are some reserved suffixes for use with CF's built-in server-side validation rules. The suffix _date is one of them. If you name a form field dob (for date of birth), say, and you want to enforce the entry of only date values, you could add a hidden form to your field called dob_date: Date of Birth: input type=text name=dob input type=hidden name=dob_date value=You must enter a valid date for date of birth! input type=hidden name=dob_required value=You must enter your date of birth! So, again, this isn't a bug. If you design a database schema for use with a CF application, you may want to avoid the use of field names that end with _date or any of the other six validation rule suffixes. Or, if you're determined to use those field names, you simply have to deal with it in your SQL statements: cfquery name=UpdStuff ... UPDATE mytable SETOrderEntry_Date = cfqueryparam value=#Form.OrderEntryDate# . WHERE ... /cfquery I'm pretty sure this is listed somewhere within the documentation, as well. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
RE: _date bug in CF5.0, possibly CFMX as well
That's not odd - it's expected behavior. Thanks for the correction. I've never used it myself but was under the mistaken impression that you had to have a corresponding hidden field to trigger the validation. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
RE: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization
Had the same thing happen before and in my case I had Startup configuration options set to start up in the last folder opened in the file dialog. In my case, that happened to be an RDS site which was not accessible any longer. Changing that path to a local drive within the registry level cured the problem. Ken -Original Message- From: Dowdell, Jason G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:32 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization Yeah, restarting the app isn't working at all because it won't restart. I was using the ftp functionality within cfstudio and I thought maybe a process got hung... So I restarted the pc but it didn't fix anything. ~Jason -Original Message- From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:30 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization Check out your server connections in the file browser. Every so often the FTP or RDS connection would get screwy on me, and would end up in memory loss. Although restarting the app would fix it. Adam Wayne Lehman Web Systems Developer Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Distance Education Division -Original Message- From: Dowdell, Jason G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:24 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization Windows 2000 Professional CFStudio 5.0 The splash screen disappears and then the cpu utilization hits 99% and stays there. This just started happening and I have no idea what has caused this. Any ideas? Thanks, Jason - Jason Dowdell IM-AES Web Developer 321.799.6845 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
RE: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization
Wish I could point you to it easily but it's been a year now. All I recall is that they were buried reeeaaalll deep in it but once found it was obvious what to change. Sorry not to be more specific. Ken -Original Message- From: Dowdell, Jason G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:30 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization Where in the registry are those entries? That could definitely be it. ~Jason -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:19 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization Had the same thing happen before and in my case I had Startup configuration options set to start up in the last folder opened in the file dialog. In my case, that happened to be an RDS site which was not accessible any longer. Changing that path to a local drive within the registry level cured the problem. Ken -Original Message- From: Dowdell, Jason G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:32 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization Yeah, restarting the app isn't working at all because it won't restart. I was using the ftp functionality within cfstudio and I thought maybe a process got hung... So I restarted the pc but it didn't fix anything. ~Jason -Original Message- From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:30 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization Check out your server connections in the file browser. Every so often the FTP or RDS connection would get screwy on me, and would end up in memory loss. Although restarting the app would fix it. Adam Wayne Lehman Web Systems Developer Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Distance Education Division -Original Message- From: Dowdell, Jason G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:24 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFStudio 5.0 takes up 100% CPU Utilization Windows 2000 Professional CFStudio 5.0 The splash screen disappears and then the cpu utilization hits 99% and stays there. This just started happening and I have no idea what has caused this. Any ideas? Thanks, Jason - Jason Dowdell IM-AES Web Developer 321.799.6845 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
RE: secure email...
Checked both CF Studio docs and printed docs for CF5 earlier today and saw no mention of it at all. Ken -Original Message- From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:47 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: secure email... I'd definitely like to see that. I can't understand why the feature would be absent in CF 4.5, present in CF 5 and absent again in CFMX. Does anyone have a set of online docs for CF 5 that are web-accessible (and rendered safe, of course?) Something at MM, maybe? ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
RE: secure email...
Hmmm, odd. Printed docs? Can you give me page #? My curiousity is really growing now. Somehow I think we're talking about two entirely different things here. :) Ken -Original Message- From: samcfug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: secure email... I find it in the Docs for CF SERVER 5.0 not in studio docs. = Douglas White group Manager mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.samcfug.org = - Original Message - From: Ken Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:53 PM Subject: RE: secure email... | Checked both CF Studio docs and printed docs for CF5 earlier today and | saw no mention of it at all. | | Ken | | | | -Original Message- | From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:47 PM | To: CF-Talk | Subject: secure email... | | | I'd definitely like to see that. I can't understand why the feature | would be absent in CF 4.5, present in CF 5 and absent again in CFMX. | Does anyone have a set of online docs for CF 5 that are web-accessible | (and rendered safe, of course?) Something at MM, maybe? | | ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: CF 5.0 certification
...will i still be certifiable after the exam I believe that would be between you and your psychiatrist to determine. :) ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
RE: SOT: Sad Day
Sorry to hear that news Vernon but glad to hear you'll be sticking around. I do hope this doesn't indicate that MM intends to reduce their interaction with the community. Ken -Original Message- From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:vernviehe;yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:50 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: SOT: Sad Day Hey Sandy, You can reach me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll be taking some time to relax, but you'll be seeing me around. I'll be able to spend more time working with CF and the other MX software, so I'll be here and in the forums participating as a member of the community! -Vern Sandy Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Just heard that Vernon is no longer CF Community Manager at Macromedia and that in fact, he isn't at Macromedia any longer. Anyone knowing his personal email address. Please let him know that Sandy would like to continue emailing with him ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Thanks Sandra Clark Shayna Productions http://www.shayna.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
RE: CFMX best practices
CFMX best practices, code optimizations, etc. Again, it sounds like you are compiling code optimization techniques not best practices. That is one part of what he was asking for. Did you have something useful to contribute or just pursuing semantics once again? ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
RE: CFMX best practices
Having people understand correct semantics seems like a valuable contribution indeed. I'm sure it would have been valuable had you done that. In any event, I feel honored matt. An actual member of the press investing the time to read, analyze and pass judgement on what few posts I've made. No doubt you noticed that I rarely post except when some a**hole annoys me with their snide remarks. Ken -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:mliotta;r337.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:43 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX best practices You may not feel that semantics is important, but the foundation of an effective communication is correct semantics. People who use incorrect semantics have a harder time communicating with their peers, which can be costly to organizations. Further, using incorrect semantics can lead to loss of opportunities. Having people understand correct semantics seems like a valuable contribution indeed. P.S. Since your decision to flame me on Evolt, I decided to look at every post you have made to CF-Talk since I joined the list. It seems that more than 75% of the time you have nothing valuable to contribute. Your latest post seems to stick to that trend. Matt Liotta President CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:kwilson;carolinapro.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:08 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX best practices CFMX best practices, code optimizations, etc. Again, it sounds like you are compiling code optimization techniques not best practices. That is one part of what he was asking for. Did you have something useful to contribute or just pursuing semantics once again? ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
RE: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?
FWIW, whoever wrote the Code Analyzer for CFMX knows it. Here's the text of what it tells you when it encounters dbvarname: ### Dbvarname Info The DBVARNAME attribute for CFPROCPARAM is ignored in ColdFusion MX. How to Fix If your application is dependent on name/value CFPROCPARAM entries, you must change them so the parameters are specified positionally. ### And here's some of what the docs say: dbVarName Required for named notation Parameter name that corresponds to the name of the parameter in the stored procedure. CFPROCPARAM in the CFML Reference Usage Use this tag to identify stored procedure parameters and their data types. Code one cfprocparam tag for each parameter. The parameters that you code vary based on parameter type and DBMS. The order in which you code cfprocparam tags depends on whether the stored procedure uses positional or named notation: Positional notation: ColdFusion passes parameters to the stored procedure in the order in which they are defined Named notation: The dbVarName for the parameter must correspond to the variable name in the stored procedure on the server. -Original Message- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:sean;corfield.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:17 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue? This topic is very off topic for CF-Talk. If this is a technical question, please repost under a different subject. Nice to see the thread-shifter works :) On Sunday, Oct 20, 2002, at 10:50 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote: My only specific issue at the moment is to either have the dbvarname attribute for cfprocparam pass the parameter to the stored procedure call by name, or properly document the fact that dbvarname currently seems to be solely for the benefit of the developer reading the code as it doesn't affect the stored procedure call. Beyond that I'm pretty happy. :) I spoke to a couple of folks on the product team and they didn't seem to be aware of this as an issue. Could you create a simple, self-contained test case that shows exactly what the problem is and then submit it as a bug (either as a code bug or a doc bug) via the standard wishlist form? Of course, if you've *already* submitted that, Vern or I can follow-up to see what happened to the issue internally... Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive. -- Margaret Atwood ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: cfprocparam / dbvarname issue?
So it sounds like a doc bug Yes, it does appear that way. Named notation has never worked on any version as best I can recall. Of course, I'd prefer to think the docs are correct and it's just a minor bug in the server that needs correcting. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: CFIndex for Verity quit working - Needs Attention by Macromedia!
I know nothing of the product but do recall a CF developer on another list raving about dtSearch as a replacement for the version of Verity packaged with CF. Might be worth looking at anyway: http://www.dtsearch.com/ Ken -Original Message- From: Trey Rouse [mailto:trouse;rice.edu] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:51 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFIndex for Verity quit working - Needs Attention by Macromedia! Is it possible you are trying to index a recordset over 250,000 records? The following is paraphrased from a Verity publication detailing the Macromedia OEM agreement: Here is a list of key counts limits by product per Verity: ColdFusion Professional:125,000 Documents Max. ColdFusion Enterprise: 250,000 Documents Max. ColdFusion Advanced:175,000 Documents Max. Coldfusion Developer Edition: 10,000 Documents Max. Features _NOT_ included with Macromedia's OEM agreement: 1. Brokered Search 2. Does not have access to any of Verity's automatic classification tools. 3. Does not support Relational Taxonomies. 4. Does not provide integration with a company's chosen security context. 5. Does not provide Verity's full document viewing capabilities. 6. Does not provide Verity's recommendation engine. 7. Does not provide a parametric search interface. 8. Does not provide hit count display for categories or parametric attribs. 9. Does not provide Federated search capabilities. 10. Does not provide Verity Gateways to content management solutions. 11. Does not provide Verity Gateways to enterprise e-mail applications. /verity As you can see according to Verity, there is no limitation of the Verity query language built into the Macromedia OEM agreement. Since this document is provided by Verity when they are trying to sell K2 to orgs that already have CFMX, I'm very confident that if sections of the query language had been limited or smurfed as part of the oem agreement, then Verity would have clearly stated this in big bold letters ;). I think you can safely read into this that the fact specific functions are not working in the CFMX verity implementation (like delete and soundex), is most likely due to a mistake in packaging on Macromedia's part. Someone from MM please address this thread! However, if there is indeed language level limitations in this OEM product, Macromedia has a responsibility to its developers to make a clear statement regarding exactly what is and isn't in this release! A few of you have asked for alternatives to the technology due to your aggravation with this implementation. Here are my thoughts on the matter: 1. For a large loose text/document search project I would recommend purchasing Verity's K2 server. I would urge you NOT to judge the Verity product based upon the oem experience delivered by the Verity97 agreement with Allaire, and the K2 agreement with macromedia. Verity's K2 is an extremely powerful product, and in my opinion the best in the field, but it is priced as such. 2. Consider using some of the database free text search utilities. Microsoft and Oracle both offer free text search utilities that run on their DB engine. MS specifically has a SOUNDEX implementation in their T-SQL implementation. This solution will place a considerably heavier burden on you as the developer, but is perhaps a more cost effective solution. You will likely never match verity's implementation of thesaurus matching, and other really cool things their engine does, but you can build a half way decent data centric search. 3. Look into competing technologies. Inktome is also a good search engine tool that you can license for your App. I haven't used them in the last 18 months, but I know they used to offer a pay as you go solution. .01 cents per query, etc. For a smaller load site this could often also be a viable alternative considering the entry cost of a K2 server. Good luck, Trey Rouse Data Architect Developer Rice University -Original Message- From: Mark Leder [mailto:mel;markleder.com] Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 1:16 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFIndex for Verity quit working Hi everyone, My client has an MS Access 2002 db which is periodically uploaded to the ISP server (Win XP-CF 5) and a CFIndex Action=refresh run on it. This process has been used successfully for several months now. The db when we started was about 4.5mb in size, now it's grown to about 11mb. The client does a compact and repair prior to uploading each time. The db only contains one table and one form, the table has an autoindex numbering for each record (no duplicates), and three other corresponding fields for each record (all memo fields). The problem is, the CF index has quit working on this database. I have not changed a single line of code. The CFQUERY prior to the CFINDEX used to retrieve the db records works normally. The CFIndex hangs, and the Access db goes into a locked condition (db.lbd). This whole
RE: Macromedia! PLEASE fix CFHTTP!!!
Unfortunatley you can't buy 5.0 anymore According to the always helpful MM folks here on the list you can. Link was posted several times recently I believe and should be in the archive if needed. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
RE: cfstoredproc behavior
Was this corrected in CFMX? Honestly, I haven't tested to find out. I ran the CFMX Code Analyzer against an old app last night and one of the things it mentioned was that dbvarname is ignored in CFMX and that parameters must be listed in proper order. Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
RE: Anybody want to start a petition for CF Studio!
I really wish we had done this... Selling HomeSite+ as ColdFusion Studio MX at $499 alongside Dreamweaver MX at $399... Yeah, but then we'd bitch and moan about it not including all the latest CFMX toys that DWMX offers rather than just wishing we could have the pre-Adobe-settlement CF Studio features. :) Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
RE: The Hidden CF factor was RE: How Good is the Job Market for ColdFusion?
Huh?! That makes no sense whatsoever. How does being eminently suitable for high-volume sites in any way negate the reality that it's widely used for internal applications? And, of course, internal apps are frequently far, far more data intensive than public sites and are heavily trafficked to boot. Ken -Original Message- From: Greg Bullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:01 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: The Hidden CF factor was RE: How Good is the Job Market for ColdFusion? This whole 'Hidden CF Factor' sort of reminds me of 'Wagner's music is better than it sounds' or perhaps 'Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.' What hogwash! Basic statistics tell us that there is probably as much 'hidden' (read: 'intranet') ASP, PHP, and J2EE, proportionately, as their is CF. On the other hand if MM *insists* that CF is 'more pervasive than the visible penetration would indicate' then that puts the lie to what Allaire and MM have said all along...that CF is eminently suitable for high-volume sites in which usage patterns are unpredictable. In all, they can't have it both ways, now can they? :-) Greg ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
RE: The Hidden CF factor was RE: How Good is the Job Market for ColdFusion?
A Yankee Group report from Oct 2001 (AFAIK it's the latest on the topic) lists CF as the #2 platform used in IT infrastructure/intranet applications. Well, there are lies, damn lies, and statistics... And then there's the truth...which that report may reflect or may not. In any event, what would you claim was the #2 platform in Oct 2001? Ken ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
RE: Pro v Enterprise? (was: The Hidden CF factor was RE: How Good is the Job Market for ColdFusion?
20 developers all happily doing CF development. We currently have v4.5 ENT, v5 ENT and MX servers in the mix, mostly on Windows with 1 or 2 Solaris thrown in for fun. Debating whether to take v4.5 apps to v5 or straight on to MX...hmmm, Friday morning in-house CFUG meeting should be interesting. In any event, we mostly work on development servers mirroring the production boxes. Being subject to the security regs of a larger organization, we're not supposed to be running web servers locally so *most* of us don't. Those that do tend to be running v5 Developer against Apache and MX Developer using the internal web server. The more we explore MX capabilities the less reason we see to move elsewhere...quite excited about where things are headed actually. Ken -Original Message- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:05 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Pro v Enterprise? (was: The Hidden CF factor was RE: How Good is the Job Market for ColdFusion? On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 16:28 US/Pacific, Greg Bullough wrote: In doing so, you have not only hobbled a lot of development paradigms where people develop on Pro and deploy on Enterprise Clusters Given that the Developer Edition is effectively a dual-IP Enterprise version, I'm not quite sure how common your development paradigm would be? I'm not too familiar with how CF folks work in general... My team have Developer Edition installed on every desktop and laptop and have Enterprise Edition installed on all the shared servers (yeah, I know, we don't have to pay for it - I'm just reporting how we operate is all!). I'm genuinely curious about the setup most folks use... If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive. -- Margaret Atwood ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
RE: CFMX Developer Edition wish was Re: Pro v Enterprise?
Actually, I believe v5 is a single-IP version, accepting connections from whatever IP address hit it first after the service started. Cycling the service was all that was required to let someone else test a site. MX appears to require editing a text file to accomplish that goal which is a real annoyance. The extra IP is nice but fixing that annoyance would be even nicer. Ken -Original Message- From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:54 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX Developer Edition wish was Re: Pro v Enterprise? The Dev edition in CF5 only allowed the local machine to connect, so the extra IP address was a step in this direction on CFMX. But I'd be interested to know how many folks feel strongly about this, so I can pass it along. -Vern -Original Message- From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:37 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFMX Developer Edition wish was Re: Pro v Enterprise? On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 05:04 PM, Sean A Corfield wrote: On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 16:28 US/Pacific, Greg Bullough wrote: In doing so, you have not only hobbled a lot of development paradigms where people develop on Pro and deploy on Enterprise Clusters Given that the Developer Edition is effectively a dual-IP Enterprise version, I'm not quite sure how common your development paradigm would be? I'm not too familiar with how CF folks work in general... My team have Developer Edition installed on every desktop and laptop and have Enterprise Edition installed on all the shared servers (yeah, I know, we don't have to pay for it - I'm just reporting how we operate is all!). I'm genuinely curious about the setup most folks use... Sean and others -- I have a wishlist item I would like to see included in a future release (update). Like Sean I use the developer edition on a Mac TiBook, I deploy on other platforms, usually shared hosts. I have found a couple of instances where the 2-IP limit is restricting demonstrations and testing. I would like to see it expanded to 3 or 5 -- anything that would allow a little more flexibility, without enabling it to be used for production (protecting Macromedia's interests). I think this could be done -- others have a similar arrangement. If I recall, Sybase Developer allows 25 db connections and Oracle Developer is similar. Anyone else see a need for this? TIA Dick The first time I see a jogger smiling, I'll consider it. - Joan Rivers - ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
