Re: [c-nsp] SXH3 ghost bugs - more details
Hi, On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:56:08PM -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote: I'm curious, is bgp dampening on or off? BGP dampening is off. gert -- Gert Doering Mobile communications ... right now writing from * Munich Airport * ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Unified Communications Manager v6.1 - Set-up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tor-Ivar Kristoffersen wrote: I was just wondering if anyone have got a cookbook sort of document for Call Manager v6.1. There's a sister mail list to this one, on the same server, for Cisco VoIP, where you might get a better response: http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip HTH, regards, oliver. - -- Oliver Gorwits, Network and Telecommunications Group, Oxford University Computing Services -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIzz8w2NPq7pwWBt4RAo9yAKCFlVFKKUDWhd3QhOkWi5eiaXJqHgCgleRs KPHBwVF6WN9gd9qStm3HKVg= =EMdf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ME3750 Shaping
Syed Waqqas Ahmed wrote: service-policy output BE-6mbps The ME3750 doesn't support egress policy maps on standard ports. Regards, Brad ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASA rule, SSH thru ASA 5505 v8.0.3
Turned out it was an ACL on the SSH Server that was blocking me... wow, that was silly. Curious tho... if I enable proxy arp I break the connection to their AS400 server, if I disable it, I kill the VPN... Jonathan On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:58 PM, D W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't encountered an issue in the past doing this. Can you send out configs? Your ACL is set to allow ssh traffic to the pre-NAT (outside) IP address, correct? Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:34:47 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] ASA rule, SSH thru ASA 5505 v8.0.3 I have an SSH server on the inside of a network, and the ASA is blocking SSH requests even tho I have an ACL permitting them and a static NAT to the SSH server. The ASA says it is blocked by the outside ACL even tho SSH (TCP 22) is specifically permitted... any ideas? Jonathan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are part of your life. See Nowhttp://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Proxy ARP and the ASA 5505
Got an ASA 5505... if I enable proxy arp, users lose connections to their AS400... If I disable it, my VPN clients can't connect anywhere... Any idea why, and how to fix? Jonathan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] c7604 starter kit
QinQ would definitely be show stopper for me too. Are you sure it's not there? At least it can be configured, but couldn't find anyone with ASR1k who could test it on this short notice. I got it directly from the BU that it wouldn't be supported until RLS2, and a customer configured it just to find it Almost Worked(TM) (there were issues with DHCP relay). However, I had a meeting with the (a?) PM yesterday, and he assured me it is in RLS1. The other thing is probably a bug then. -A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] IS-IS for IPv6: Passive Loopback Interface Address Not Propagated
Hi all. Has anyone experienced failure of the v6 address on a (dual-stacked) Loopback interface from being propagated into IS-IS? We're seeing this on 12.2(33)SRC1 deployed on NPE-G2's, NPE-G1's and 7201's. IS-IS is running in multi-topology mode, v6 infrastructure addresses are propagated fine, it's just that v6 addresses on the Loopback interface won't be. Our pseudonodes (DIS's) are running on SUP720-3BXL's with 12.2(33)SXH3. These are able to propagate their v6 Loopback interface addresses to the network, including to the 7200's. v4 is unaffected. We have a case open with TAC, but it's been a while since they gave us any feedback. All help appreciated. Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] c7604 starter kit
On (2008-09-16 07:10 +0200), Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: However, I had a meeting with the (a?) PM yesterday, and he assured me it is in RLS1. The other thing is probably a bug then. Ok so far we've listed EoMPLS and VPLS as definitely missing software features, I still wonder what the 'OP' (Frank Bulk) ment by 'minimum software features', perhaps something else that I'm not seeing. -- ++ytti ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] SXH3 ghost bugs - more details
Hi, On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:11:14PM +0100, Peter Taphouse wrote: Just to second (or third?) this bug. We've got four 7600s on SXH3 which are afflicted by this - they were upgraded from 2a on tac's advise (to avoid netflow bug related spontaneous reloads) - and we don't use dampening. It doesn't seem to matter if the prefixes that get withdrawn are i or ebgp, they get still ghosted to other ibgp peers. For iBGP-iBGP ghosts, our current setup is not suitable (read: no route-reflector setup, so iBGP-iBGP announcements would not take place), thus I have no evidence on whether this would also trigger the bug for us. But I think it's quite likely indeed, given that this seems to happen on sending *out* the withdraw... I've got a case open with tac, Would you mind sharing the case number with me? I could forward this to our TAC engineer so they know this is not just us. Do you have a bug ID? but it's causing us enough grief that I'm moving back to SXF until things calm down. *grumble* - I would love to do that, given that we're quite happy with SXF since about two years now. But we were unlucky/stupid enough to get Sup720-10Gs for these new boxes, and they only run SHX... Would love the new netflow stuff in SXH if it gets stable enough... We're quite happy with the SHX3 netflow. No crashes (yet, knock wood) and the load on everything is indeed much lower. There are some other funnies in SXH3, but these are just annoyances and not service impacting (we're not using scp). gert -- Gert Doering Mobile communications ... right now writing from * Munich Airport * ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Data destinations for cisco sce 2000 devices
Hi All We currently use a cisco sce2000 appliance to provision international bandwidth to our customers and to export traffic flows (in the form of RDR packets) to a single flow collection server (data destination), which stores the flows in a sql database. Recently we've needed to add some redundancy and failover to this data collection and it turns out (as stated in the sce documentation) that the sce will support multiple destinations for rdr packets and that it will use those destinations in 3 modes: 1. Redundant data collection servers with failover to the next destination if one is unreachable. 2. Multicast to several destinations 3. Round robin to several destinations My question is this: Does anyone know if this actually works in practice as a mechansism for making the data collection database redundant? I.e despite what the sce documentation states, is there any reason why the sce using Redundant data collectors with failover would not be a viable way of adding redundancy to the data collection database? Thanks in advance! Traiano Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you! ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] logging server in MPLS VRF
Hi, I am curious to know whether we should put snmp logging servers part of MPLS vpn (as this has to reveive logs from all servers across the network) or it should be the part of global routing table. If we can do ti with mpls vpn, is there any benefit? Regards, Vikas Sharma ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] cisco 7507 vs ssg 550
Hi, We have a cisco 7507 router for our wan and are thinking of replacing it with juniper ssg 550. Currently we have 1 GEIP interface on the lan side of 7507 and 1 POS(STM/OC3) interface on the wan side. We have a few IP IP tunnels established and are running BGP over the wan and OSPF on the lan side. We also have the need of using PBRs. The main reason behind this change is that we are going to outgrow our STM capacity and need to upgrade to higher bandwidth on the wan side. hence similarly we will need to have a better option on the lan side instead of GEIP due to the limitation of 200mbps aggregate throughput on it. Thanks in advance for your suggestions regards Famz _ News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now! http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] 6500 acl log cpu hit
All, We've recently disabled OAL because we had to enable VACL capture. Without OAL, can I ensure a stray log ACL statement won't kill the box? Can I use one of the MLS rate limiters to throttle it? The obvious ones seem to be: ACL VACL LOG - set to on, 2000pps ICMP UNREAC. ACL-DROP - set to on, 0pps as OAL wanted this Or does ACL log traffic hit the CoPP limiters? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco 12406 Etherchannel
Hi I am trying to configure Ethernchannel/link bundling on a 12406. The port channel seems to be accepted, however when I try and add a channel-group to my GE interfaces, it says its not supported? I am using SPA-10X1GE-V2 line cards with c12kprp-p-mz.120-32.SY6.bin IOS interface Port-channel1 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast channel-group minimum active 1 no channel-group bandwidth control-propagation router(config-if)#channel-group 1 Error: not supported on GigabitEthernet0/0/0. Is there a way to bundle more that 1GE port on a 12406? Regards Mark ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS for IPv6: Passive Loopback Interface Address Not Propagated
Mark Tinka a écrit : Hi all. Has anyone experienced failure of the v6 address on a (dual-stacked) Loopback interface from being propagated into IS-IS? We have the same setup and no particular issue with that. We're seeing this on 12.2(33)SRC1 deployed on NPE-G2's, NPE-G1's and 7201's. My version is : IOS 124-11.T2 IS-IS is running in multi-topology mode, v6 infrastructure addresses are propagated fine, it's just that v6 addresses on the Loopback interface won't be. Did you try ISIS debug command in order to see what's happening ? When you inject your loopback ? Our pseudonodes (DIS's) are running on SUP720-3BXL's with 12.2(33)SXH3. These are able to propagate their v6 Loopback interface addresses to the network, including to the 7200's. v4 is unaffected. We have a case open with TAC, but it's been a while since they gave us any feedback. All help appreciated. I record that there was some issues related to ISIS in multi-topology environment. metric style wide command was needed and also the interface command ipv6 enable is sometimes mandatory. (depending on the IOS vesion) Please fin herewith this mail a snipset of config related to ISIS for IPv6: ! interface Loopback0 ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.255 ipv6 address 2001:DB8:2200:11::1/128 ipv6 enable ! interface Loopback1 ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.255 ipv6 address 2001:DB8:2200:11::2/128 ipv6 enable ! interface Loopback2 ip address 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.255 ipv6 address 2001:DB8:2200:11::3/128 ipv6 enable ! ! router isis net 49.0001....00 metric-style wide fast-flood 15 max-lsp-lifetime 65535 spf-interval 1 1 10 prc-interval 1 1 10 lsp-gen-interval 5 1 50 no hello padding log-adjacency-changes passive-interface Loopback0 passive-interface Loopback1 passive-interface Loopback2 bfd all-interfaces ! address-family ipv6 multi-topology exit-address-family ! GSR-2#sh ipv6 protocols IPv6 Routing Protocol is connected IPv6 Routing Protocol is static IPv6 Routing Protocol is isis Interfaces: FastEthernet1/0 FastEthernet2/0 Loopback0 (Passive) Loopback1 (Passive) Loopback2 (Passive) Redistribution: None IPv6 Routing Protocol is bgp 65200 Route Reflector for address family IPv6 Unicast, 2 clients IGP synchronization is disabled Redistribution: None Neighbor(s): AddressFiltIn FiltOut Weight RoutemapIn RoutemapOut 2001:DB8:2100:11::2 2001:DB8:2300:11::2 IPv6 Routing Protocol is bgp multicast Route Reflector for address family IPv6 Unicast, 2 clients IGP synchronization is disabled Redistribution: None Neighbor(s): AddressFiltIn FiltOut Weight RoutemapIn RoutemapOut 2001:DB8:2100:11::2 2001:DB8:2300:11::2 Just my 2 cents, Hope this helps (Sorry if not), but I'm curious about the answer... At the sounds like it is a issue with the IOS version. (Any possibility to try an other one ?) Bgrds/Fred -- Frederic LOUI / GIP RENATER Service de Suivi Operationnel / Metrologie QoS Network Operations Service / Metrology QoS Tel: +33 1 53 94 20 82 / Fax: +33 1 53 94 20 31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.renater.fr ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco NAC
First try Cisco: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6128/tsd_products_support_series_home. html http://cisconac.blogspot.com/ One of my coworker's blog - he's excellent with NAC deployment. http://cnc-networksecurity.blogspot.com/ Mailing list: http://listserv.muohio.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A0=cleanaccess -Luan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Fischer Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 6:29 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco NAC Does anyone here use the Cisco NAC product? Is there a mailing list of which anyone knows specifically for Cisco NAC? User's group? Online community? Any assistance in directing me toward any of these resources would be genuinely appreciated. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 6500 acl log cpu hit
You should use ACL BRIDGED IN/OUT to control that rate: mls rate unicast acl input|output Tim At 03:56 AM 9/16/2008, Phil Mayers observed: All, We've recently disabled OAL because we had to enable VACL capture. Without OAL, can I ensure a stray log ACL statement won't kill the box? Can I use one of the MLS rate limiters to throttle it? The obvious ones seem to be: ACL VACL LOG - set to on, 2000pps ICMP UNREAC. ACL-DROP - set to on, 0pps as OAL wanted this Or does ACL log traffic hit the CoPP limiters? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Tim Stevenson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Routing Switching CCIE #5561 Technical Marketing Engineer, Data Center BU Cisco Systems, http://www.cisco.com IP Phone: 408-526-6759 The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential* and are intended for the specified recipients only. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] NPE G1, CEF and ACLs and high CPU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 List, I will work on it and report the results accordingly. As promised - here comes the report 1) I have reworked the ACL to introduce the shortcuts like permit tcp any any established and permiting all traffic to customer pools upfront. It looks like the majority of traffic is now permited and about 8% of is matched for the last permit ip any any (vs 77%) with previous ACL. 2) Also I noticed that I haven't got no ip unreachables on the port so I have enabled that. Since then the RP PAS Features punts stopped increasing 3) Finally - the CPU load - there is no significant drop of CPU load (no immediate effect). I will monitor the CPU for longer periods to see if there is at least any trend (up, down, no change). (box is pushing 480Mbps/90kps of input traffic #sh ver | in IOS|processo Cisco IOS Software, 7301 Software (C7301-K91P-M), Version 12.2(28)SB6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Cisco 7301 (NPE) processor (revision D) with 983040K/65536K bytes of memory.) Seems I need a HW upgrade anyway. Also I will try to upgrade to 12.4.20T but not now. Best Regards, - -- - -mat -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIz7MjIvBv0k5esR4RAkUoAKCVREfOGZZ/tQhLm3jM264kpReHPwCeJLrm 8Le8SjzUB3xNIQnufd7Ycaw= =c2Ct -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] 3750ME-7609 ES interface problem
I currently have a 3750ME connected via one of its ES interfaces to a 6509 on one of the OSM (GE-WAN) interfaces and things work fine. However, when I try to connect the other ES port on the same 3750ME to a 7609 GigE interface the port won't come up. What is strange is that the 3750ME shows the port as up/up, but the 7609 shows it as down/ down. Interestingly, if I shut the 7609 port the 3750's port then goes down as well. What am I missing? -Matt ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] RES: Cisco 12406 Etherchannel
There are some restrictions... Take a look: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/lnkbndl.html Cheers. De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] em nome de Mark Tech Enviada: ter 16/9/2008 08:12 Para: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Assunto: [c-nsp] Cisco 12406 Etherchannel Hi I am trying to configure Ethernchannel/link bundling on a 12406. The port channel seems to be accepted, however when I try and add a channel-group to my GE interfaces, it says its not supported? I am using SPA-10X1GE-V2 line cards with c12kprp-p-mz.120-32.SY6.bin IOS interface Port-channel1 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast channel-group minimum active 1 no channel-group bandwidth control-propagation router(config-if)#channel-group 1 Error: not supported on GigabitEthernet0/0/0. Is there a way to bundle more that 1GE port on a 12406? Regards Mark ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] SXH3 ghost bugs - more details
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Would you mind sharing the case number with me? I could forward this to our TAC engineer so they know this is not just us. Do you have a bug ID? I've got no bug ID, but it's on case SR 609537689. SXH3 introduced another new bgp bug too - the output of show ip bgp neigh xx.xxx.xx.xx advertised-routes produced badly wrong output. For example it showed us announcing zero prefixes to one of our transit providers, even though their looking glass showed them receiving them just fine :-/ That's why I opened the case originally, the ghosting bug I noticed afterwards and then I quickly moved to SXF since it was causing too much grief. but it's causing us enough grief that I'm moving back to SXF until things calm down. *grumble* - I would love to do that, given that we're quite happy with SXF since about two years now. But we were unlucky/stupid enough to get Sup720-10Gs for these new boxes, and they only run SHX... Just to make you feel better, the 7604 I reloaded yesterday with SXF15 just spontaneously reloaded... - -- Peter Taphouse Bytemark Hosting http://www.bytemark.co.uk/ tel. +44 (0) 845 004 3 004 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIz8GDIAZ7OKeBB58RAi3zAKCaUsJbYjy6yRwx4796Yv9ko+hXTQCePYEB UaQrHjlsOaFCeXKrjz7yTag= =WgJ0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco 12406 Etherchannel
Hi, thanks for that. Just had a look at my inventory sh inventory NAME: slot 0, DESCR: ISE 10G Modular Services Card v2 PID: 12000-SIP-601 , VID: V04, SN: SAD12340460 Looks like I have an ISE card installed. If I look at the restrictions for the ISE, seems like only the following cards are supported: IP Service Engine (ISE): –4-port Gigabit Ethernet ISE line card –4-port OC-3c/STM-1c POS/SDH ISE line card –8-port OC-3c/STM-1c POS/SDH ISE line card –16-port OC-3c/STM-1c POS/SDH ISE line card –4-port OC-12c/STM-4c POS/SDH ISE line card –1-port OC-48c/STM-16c POS/SDH ISE line card However it then goes to mention that the following cards support it. Engine 5 SPA Interface Processors (SIPs): –10G Engine 5 SPA Interface Processor (12000-SIP-600) –2.5G multiservice engine SPA Interface Processor (12000-SIP-401) –5G multiservice engine SPA Interface Processor (12000-SIP-501) –10G multiservice engine SPA Interface Processor (12000-SIP-601) The GE cards are installed in a 12000-SIP-601, or is that I don't have an'Engine 5' within the 601installed? Regards Mark - Original Message From: Leonardo Gama Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:49:54 PM Subject: RES: [c-nsp] Cisco 12406 Etherchannel There are some restrictions... Take a look: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/lnkbndl.html Cheers. De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] em nome de Mark Tech Enviada: ter 16/9/2008 08:12 Para: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Assunto: [c-nsp] Cisco 12406 Etherchannel Hi I am trying to configure Ethernchannel/link bundling on a 12406. The port channel seems to be accepted, however when I try and add a channel-group to my GE interfaces, it says its not supported? I am using SPA-10X1GE-V2 line cards with c12kprp-p-mz.120-32.SY6.bin IOS interface Port-channel1 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast channel-group minimum active 1 no channel-group bandwidth control-propagation router(config-if)#channel-group 1 Error: not supported on GigabitEthernet0/0/0. Is there a way to bundle more that 1GE port on a 12406? Regards Mark ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS for IPv6: Passive Loopback Interface Address Not Propagated
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 20:36:00 Frederic LOUI wrote: My version is : IOS 124-11.T2 We haven't tested other releases on these boxes yet. 12.2(33)SXH3 does work on our SUP720-3BXL's, though. Did you try ISIS debug command in order to see what's happening ? When you inject your loopback ? We did; nothing came up - all other interfaces are added into IS-IS with the exception of the Loopbacks. I record that there was some issues related to ISIS in multi-topology environment. Actually, we found MT very useful when dual-stacking v4 and v6. metric style wide command was needed... We use wide metrics by default on all our IS's. and also the interface command ipv6 enable is sometimes mandatory. (depending on the IOS vesion) We haven't had to do this for our v6 deployment (even when I run v6 under 12.3 mainline at my previous employer). However, we did try enabling this command without much success in resolving this particular issue. Please fin herewith this mail a snipset of config related to ISIS for IPv6: Pretty straight forward. At the sounds like it is a issue with the IOS version. Agree. Will work it and hope TAC can reproduce the issue. Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Check bandwidth on router
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:54:45PM -0500, root net wrote: Hi List, Is there some sort of tool you can load into the IOS on a router to check bandwidth? Or if not what are you all doing these days in this situation. Like for example things are running slow and you think the Internet feed may be the problem is there a way to do speed tests on the router itself? You can use ttcp directly from your router, it's a bit like iperf. It's a hidden commmand but works basically like the unix version, just type 'ttcp' at your IOS prompt and follow the guide. STH1#ttcp transmit or receive [receive]: ... -K -- Kristian LarssonKLL-RIPE Network Engineer / Internet CoreTele2 / SWIPnet [AS1257] +46 704 910401[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 3750ME-7609 ES interface problem
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Matt Liotta wrote: I currently have a 3750ME connected via one of its ES interfaces to a 6509 on one of the OSM (GE-WAN) interfaces and things work fine. However, when I try to connect the other ES port on the same 3750ME to a 7609 GigE interface the port won't come up. What is strange is that the 3750ME shows the port as up/up, but the 7609 shows it as down/ down. Interestingly, if I shut the 7609 port the 3750's port then goes down as well. What am I missing? -Matt Hi. Do you have the same autonegotiate settings on the 7609 and the 3750. On the 3750 do you have speed nonegotiate and the same goes for the 7609. If you haven't configured it specifically it will be autonegotiated. This can lead to one port being up and the other down I've been bitten by this myself. This might not be your issue but it's just a hunch. See the link below: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/12.2SXF/configuration/guide /intrface.html#wp1040549 /Daniel __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3446 (20080916) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] SRC2?
9/30 'ish On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:50:50PM +0300, Ran Liebermann wrote: Hi All, On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bas Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know when 12.2(33)SRC2 is supposed to be released, specifically for the 7600. I had heard by the end of July, but so far no release. The latest statement we got from them was end-september. Anyone from Cisco perhaps would comment on this? CSCso45720 makes it really problematic to go into production stage with the SRC train. Cheers, -- Ran. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] MX960 vs Cisco 7600
hello, We are a small ISP based out of Asia and we are considering above two products for carrier ethernet deployment. If anyone has done a comparitive study or have experience (support, feature-richness, IOS/JUNOS stability etc.). Thanks Steve ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] SRC2?
I believe SRD (plus the new ES cards) are supposed to come out at that time too... -- Tassos Rodney Dunn wrote on 16/09/2008 23:17: 9/30 'ish On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:50:50PM +0300, Ran Liebermann wrote: Hi All, On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bas Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know when 12.2(33)SRC2 is supposed to be released, specifically for the 7600. I had heard by the end of July, but so far no release. The latest statement we got from them was end-september. Anyone from Cisco perhaps would comment on this? CSCso45720 makes it really problematic to go into production stage with the SRC train. Cheers, -- Ran. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco 12406 Etherchannel
You need 12.0(33)S1 Starting in Cisco IOS Release 12.0(33)S, Engine 5 line cards are also supported as the egress interface on which you can configure a virtual interface (EtherChannel or POS channel) for a link bundle. For a list of supported Engine 5 interfaces, see Line Cards Supported on the Cisco 12000 Routerhttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/lnkbndl.html#wp1041951. Nitzan On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 18:57, Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, thanks for that. Just had a look at my inventory sh inventory NAME: slot 0, DESCR: ISE 10G Modular Services Card v2 PID: 12000-SIP-601 , VID: V04, SN: SAD12340460 Looks like I have an ISE card installed. If I look at the restrictions for the ISE, seems like only the following cards are supported: IP Service Engine (ISE): –4-port Gigabit Ethernet ISE line card –4-port OC-3c/STM-1c POS/SDH ISE line card –8-port OC-3c/STM-1c POS/SDH ISE line card –16-port OC-3c/STM-1c POS/SDH ISE line card –4-port OC-12c/STM-4c POS/SDH ISE line card –1-port OC-48c/STM-16c POS/SDH ISE line card However it then goes to mention that the following cards support it. Engine 5 SPA Interface Processors (SIPs): –10G Engine 5 SPA Interface Processor (12000-SIP-600) –2.5G multiservice engine SPA Interface Processor (12000-SIP-401) –5G multiservice engine SPA Interface Processor (12000-SIP-501) –10G multiservice engine SPA Interface Processor (12000-SIP-601) The GE cards are installed in a 12000-SIP-601, or is that I don't have an'Engine 5' within the 601installed? Regards Mark - Original Message From: Leonardo Gama Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:49:54 PM Subject: RES: [c-nsp] Cisco 12406 Etherchannel There are some restrictions... Take a look: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/lnkbndl.html Cheers. De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] em nome de Mark Tech Enviada: ter 16/9/2008 08:12 Para: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Assunto: [c-nsp] Cisco 12406 Etherchannel Hi I am trying to configure Ethernchannel/link bundling on a 12406. The port channel seems to be accepted, however when I try and add a channel-group to my GE interfaces, it says its not supported? I am using SPA-10X1GE-V2 line cards with c12kprp-p-mz.120-32.SY6.bin IOS interface Port-channel1 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast channel-group minimum active 1 no channel-group bandwidth control-propagation router(config-if)#channel-group 1 Error: not supported on GigabitEthernet0/0/0. Is there a way to bundle more that 1GE port on a 12406? Regards Mark ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] MX960 vs Cisco 7600
Cisco 7600 + ES20 are way too expensive on a price/port perspective. Consider distributing smaller Cisco ME6524 boxes (which is not as cheap as it used to be, but it is still lot less than 7600) instead of large boxes like MX 960; if you really have the density to buy MX 960 instead of MX 240, I don't think there is anything on Cisco-land that can match that. Rubens On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Steven Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, We are a small ISP based out of Asia and we are considering above two products for carrier ethernet deployment. If anyone has done a comparitive study or have experience (support, feature-richness, IOS/JUNOS stability etc.). Thanks Steve ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] MX960 vs Cisco 7600
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 09:24:13 Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: Cisco 7600 + ES20 are way too expensive on a price/port perspective. Consider distributing smaller Cisco ME6524 boxes (which is not as cheap as it used to be, but it is still lot less than 7600)... In our consideration for a small box capable of handling a large number of EoMPLS VC's, the ME6524 came up - but sadly, we can only think of it in that function, and not a combined L2VPN + IP termination device. This is because it can only support 256,000 v4 routing entries (PFC-3C). Would advise the OP to look at this if he's thinking of carrying full routes on it. If 0/0 is good enough, then no worries. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] MX960 vs Cisco 7600
Mark, Even with no full-routing capability, one can still do L3 or L2 VPN so the customer can reach a central Internet router with half million/one million routes if it`s a BGP customer, or follow default if it's a single-homed customer. That works if such a BGP customer are in the few percent exception, not on 90%+ rule... which is the case for our market, but might not be the case for the original poster. Good point. Rubens On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Mark Tinka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2008 09:24:13 Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: Cisco 7600 + ES20 are way too expensive on a price/port perspective. Consider distributing smaller Cisco ME6524 boxes (which is not as cheap as it used to be, but it is still lot less than 7600)... In our consideration for a small box capable of handling a large number of EoMPLS VC's, the ME6524 came up - but sadly, we can only think of it in that function, and not a combined L2VPN + IP termination device. This is because it can only support 256,000 v4 routing entries (PFC-3C). Would advise the OP to look at this if he's thinking of carrying full routes on it. If 0/0 is good enough, then no worries. Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] NTP not synchronizing
I kept working on this ntp issue.It's a fact that there's no packet going out of the serial interface of the router even when NTP debugging says NTP xmit packet.NTP Server is reacheable from the router through any protocol. Did some attempts like swapping ntp server ,changing ntp versions,changing ntp server software,adding ntp broadcast delay in the router.Heck I even disabled ntp so I can get a different message other than Clock is unsynchronized. Last time I restarted the router I removed all the ntp configuration in the hope that it recalculates ntp clock-period parameter as cisco documentation states but it didn't so now it's working with the previous clock-period parameter. These are detailed outputs of ntp status commands: R1show ntp assoc de NTP.Server configured, insane, invalid, unsynced, stratum 16 ref ID 0.0.0.0, time . (19:00:00.000 City Thu Dec 31 1899) our mode client, peer mode unspec, our poll intvl 64, peer poll intvl 64 root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 0.00, reach 0, sync dist 0.000 delay 0.00 msec, offset 0. msec, dispersion 16000.00 precision 2**5, version 3 org time . (19:00:00.000 City Thu Dec 31 1899) rcv time . (19:00:00.000 City Thu Dec 31 1899) xmt time CC7AC750.449B3CCC (19:01:20.267 City Tue Sep 16 2008) filtdelay = 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 0.00 filtoffset =0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 0.00 filterror = 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 R1show ntp stat Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock nominal freq is 249.5901 Hz, actual freq is 249.5906 Hz, precision is 2**16 reference time is CC7553E4.FE3E6D2D (15:47:32.993 City Fri Sep 12 2008) clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec root dispersion is 0.02 msec, peer dispersion is 0.02 msec I may try to restart it one more time before I suspect a faulty ntp service. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Aaron R Enviado el: Monday, September 15, 2008 7:12 AM Para: 'Mike Louis'; 'root net'; Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Asunto: Re: [c-nsp] NTP not synchronizing I have had similar problems in the past. I have found if your clock / date are not set properly the router will refuse to accept the NTP update as the offset is too large. Also as suggested try multiple NTP servers. The fact that you are unable to see the configured NTP servers' ref clock / stratum most likely indicates some kind of comms issue. Cheers, Aaron. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Louis Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 7:40 PM To: root net; Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NTP not synchronizing What source interface is the cisco client router using for NTP requests? If its not configured it will use the outbound interface used to reach the server. I saw an issue the other day where the external interface on the WAN was not reachable by the NTP server at the home office and thus they could not sync time. They changed the source interface to ntp source-interface Fax/x (for their lan which was reachable) and were able to get sync'd. HTH Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of root net Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 12:17 AM To: Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NTP not synchronizing What NTP server are you using? Are you trying to use the Cisco router as the NTP server for your clients/hosts on your network or what? My bet is the NTP server is overwhelmed you are trying to connect to. I had this issue before and changed NTP servers worked like a charm. Check the NIST listing for an updated listing of NTP servers that are free or with little users. rootnet On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there. I'm having a problem trying to synchronize a Cisco Router across a wan link with a NTP Server (No-Cisco router).So far i've ruled out packet filering or firewall blocking as a cause of this.Some other equipments at the local side of this router actually synchronize with the ntp server at our LAN.What strikes me is the fact that router does reach ntp server via other protocols other than ntp tough. This is what i get from the out-of-sync router: #Show ntp assoc address ref clock st when poll reach delay offset disp ~NTPServer0.0.0.0 16 -640 0.00.00 16000. * master (synced), # master (unsynced), + selected, - candidate, ~ configured I've set debugging for the ntp packets and for all the traffic getting out of the serial interface which got NTP: xmit packet to NTP.Server events.However there 's absolutely no attempt whatsoever of packet being transmitted to NTP
Re: [c-nsp] NTP not synchronizing
Is the NTP you're trying to sync to synchronized itself? NTP (unlike SNTP) requires that. The 'insane' and 'invalid' debug messages seem to indicate that, I believe. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:23 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NTP not synchronizing I kept working on this ntp issue.It's a fact that there's no packet going out of the serial interface of the router even when NTP debugging says NTP xmit packet.NTP Server is reacheable from the router through any protocol. Did some attempts like swapping ntp server ,changing ntp versions,changing ntp server software,adding ntp broadcast delay in the router.Heck I even disabled ntp so I can get a different message other than Clock is unsynchronized. Last time I restarted the router I removed all the ntp configuration in the hope that it recalculates ntp clock-period parameter as cisco documentation states but it didn't so now it's working with the previous clock-period parameter. These are detailed outputs of ntp status commands: R1show ntp assoc de NTP.Server configured, insane, invalid, unsynced, stratum 16 ref ID 0.0.0.0, time . (19:00:00.000 City Thu Dec 31 1899) our mode client, peer mode unspec, our poll intvl 64, peer poll intvl 64 root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 0.00, reach 0, sync dist 0.000 delay 0.00 msec, offset 0. msec, dispersion 16000.00 precision 2**5, version 3 org time . (19:00:00.000 City Thu Dec 31 1899) rcv time . (19:00:00.000 City Thu Dec 31 1899) xmt time CC7AC750.449B3CCC (19:01:20.267 City Tue Sep 16 2008) filtdelay = 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 0.00 filtoffset =0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 0.00 filterror = 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 R1show ntp stat Clock is unsynchronized, stratum 16, no reference clock nominal freq is 249.5901 Hz, actual freq is 249.5906 Hz, precision is 2**16 reference time is CC7553E4.FE3E6D2D (15:47:32.993 City Fri Sep 12 2008) clock offset is 0. msec, root delay is 0.00 msec root dispersion is 0.02 msec, peer dispersion is 0.02 msec I may try to restart it one more time before I suspect a faulty ntp service. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Aaron R Enviado el: Monday, September 15, 2008 7:12 AM Para: 'Mike Louis'; 'root net'; Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Asunto: Re: [c-nsp] NTP not synchronizing I have had similar problems in the past. I have found if your clock / date are not set properly the router will refuse to accept the NTP update as the offset is too large. Also as suggested try multiple NTP servers. The fact that you are unable to see the configured NTP servers' ref clock / stratum most likely indicates some kind of comms issue. Cheers, Aaron. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Louis Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 7:40 PM To: root net; Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NTP not synchronizing What source interface is the cisco client router using for NTP requests? If its not configured it will use the outbound interface used to reach the server. I saw an issue the other day where the external interface on the WAN was not reachable by the NTP server at the home office and thus they could not sync time. They changed the source interface to ntp source-interface Fax/x (for their lan which was reachable) and were able to get sync'd. HTH Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of root net Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 12:17 AM To: Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NTP not synchronizing What NTP server are you using? Are you trying to use the Cisco router as the NTP server for your clients/hosts on your network or what? My bet is the NTP server is overwhelmed you are trying to connect to. I had this issue before and changed NTP servers worked like a charm. Check the NIST listing for an updated listing of NTP servers that are free or with little users. rootnet On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Velasquez Venegas Jaime Omar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there. I'm having a problem trying to synchronize a Cisco Router across a wan link with a NTP Server (No-Cisco router).So far i've ruled out packet filering or firewall blocking as a cause of this.Some other equipments at the local side of this router actually synchronize with the ntp server at our LAN.What strikes me is the fact that router does reach ntp server via other protocols other than ntp tough. This is what i get from the out-of-sync router: #Show ntp assoc address ref clock st when poll reach delay
Re: [c-nsp] ME3750 Shaping
Eric Van Tol wrote: I've explained the situation to both Arie and my local SE. It looks like the 3750 is simply not able to provide what we need it to do today. Oh I'm sure it can do what you need - but only on 2 out of the 28 ports :-/ (which is obviously insufficient) When I've hit this situation I've ended up using multiple ME3750s but this isn't really scalable beyond 2 units. 7600+OSM or 7600+SIP400+GE SPA's are just (for our application) too expensive. ASR might be a viable option depending on required throughput. Regards, Brad ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Check bandwidth on router
0n Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:05:47PM +0200, Kristian Larsson wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:54:45PM -0500, root net wrote: Hi List, Is there some sort of tool you can load into the IOS on a router to check bandwidth? Or if not what are you all doing these days in this situation. Like for example things are running slow and you think the Internet feed may be the problem is there a way to do speed tests on the router itself? You can use ttcp directly from your router, it's a bit like iperf. It's a hidden commmand but works basically like the unix version, just type 'ttcp' at your IOS prompt and follow the guide. Why on earth is it a hidden command I wonder ? -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Check bandwidth on router
Wilkinson, Alex wrote: Why on earth is [ttcp] a hidden command I wonder ? It's an unsupported command. If only Cisco would remove (not just hide) other unsupported commands across the various platforms. I've seen the performance of ttcp vary across platforms and IOS versions - in some instances it demonstrates inconsistent and low throughput where no such problem really exists, so don't assume the results from ttcp run from routers/switches are necessarily accurate or rely on the results for fault diagnosis. Regards, Brad ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
