Re: Don't understand inline vs extend-type implementation of defprotocol across namespaces
Flea Wong globalf...@gmail.com writes: Hi! I'll take the third question first: 3. Why the different function call subtotal (*without* Dot, see Apple) vs .subtotal (*with* Dot, see Orange) for extend-type vs inline implementation of Fruit? You should always use (subtotal fruit). That with an inline implementation which is backed by some generated interface there is a .subtotal method is a pure implementation detail you shouldn't rely on. I.e., (.subtotal fruit) is no function call but a Java interop method call. 1. Why *doesn't* extend-type (see Banana) work when implementing protocol Fruit in a different namespace It does work, but since Banana doesn't extend Fruit inline, the corresponding Fruit interface has no .subtotal method, so you cannot call it using (.subtotal banana) but (subtotal banana) will work. 2. Why *does* inline implementation (see Apple) work when implementing protocol Fruit in a different namespace Calling (.subtotal apple) works, because it's implemented inline and so the corresponding interface has that method and you can call it using Java interop which (.subtotal apple) is. Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: clojurescript introduction
thank u all for responses, very helpful regards PR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ANN: Namespace browser for Emacs users
Nicely done! As you might know I'm cider's maintainer and I actually had a namespace browser on the roadmap. :-) I'd like to invite you to transfer the project to the official clojure-emacs github organisation (to increase the package's visibility and to make easier for the cider team to help you with the maintenance). I hope to eventually include cider-browse-ns in the standard cider package. On Monday, July 28, 2014 5:48:20 AM UTC+3, John Andrews wrote: Emacs users: I have put together a namespace browser which builds upon the existing functionality of Cider. It is in early stages of development but I find it quite useful. Check it out! https://github.com/jxa/cider-browse-ns -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: A few String functions we could implement in Clojure?
I recently raised a similar point regarding `starts-with?` and `ends-with?` (link - http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1449) and it seems that Clojure's team acknowledges that this is valid reasoning. I think you should open a ticket as well as the case you present is pretty much the same. With ClojureScript and cljx it makes much more sense now to create portable interfaces that it used to before (in the era of Java-only Clojure). On Saturday, July 19, 2014 6:56:44 PM UTC+3, Pierre Masci wrote: Thank you for your insight Andy :-) Interesting question Bruce. -- Pierre Masci On 19 July 2014 16:49, Andy Fingerhut andy.fi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: I would have to defer that question to someone who makes decisions regarding what goes into Clojure/ClojureScript, and what does not. Of course, anyone else is free to create libraries that try to make portability between those two platforms easier. Perhaps someone has already taken a go at creating such a thing? I haven't used ClojureScript myself yet, so haven't looked for anything in that area. Andy On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Bruce Durling b...@otfrom.com javascript: wrote: Andy, How much of this reasoning do you think changes when we starting thinking about being hosted on multiple platforms (I'm thinking specifically clojure/clojurescript and cljx)? cheers, Bruce On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.fi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Pierre: I maintain the cheatsheet, and I put .indexOf and .lastIndexOf on there since they are probably the most common thing I saw asked about that is in the Java API but not the Clojure API, for strings. There are also links to whole Java classes and their entire API, e.g. for file I/O, for which there is no Clojure equivalent, since file I/O is a common need. Clojure is meant to be a hosted language, not hiding its host platform, but making it easily callable. If there are entire Java classes that meet very common needs that aren't mentioned on the cheatsheet, I would consider adding links to their documentation pages. I don't want to fill up the cheatsheet with many individual Java methods, though. As for why there are not Clojure equivalents of particular Java API methods, I think the reasoning might be similar (it has likely been discussed publicly, but I don't have a link handy) -- don't create a large number of Clojure functions that do nothing more than what the equivalent Java APIs do. Andy On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Pierre Masci mas...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi all, just nit picking about Clojure's String API. I've been comparing it with Java's, and I noticed that (not surprisingly) they are very similar. There are just 2-3 functions that exist in Java but don't have an equivalent in Clojure. I was wondering if they could be worth adding to clojure.string : (.indexOf s c) and (.lastIndexOf c) (.startsWith s danc) and (.endsWith s ing) (.charAt s 5) same as (get s 5) but expresses a clearer intent. It's less general than (get) though as it only applies to Strings, so that might be unnecessary sugar. .indexOf and .lastIndexOf are indicated in the Clojure Cheatsheet, maybe .startsWith and .endsWith also deserve to be mentioned there? I've been wondering why some functions have been ported, like (lower-case) for (.toLowerCase), but not the ones mentioned above. I told you it was nit picking (^c^) Clojure's API is awesome as it is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com javascript: Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com javascript: Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
Re: Don't understand inline vs extend-type implementation of defprotocol across namespaces
On Friday, August 1, 2014 5:32:15 PM UTC+8, Tassilo Horn wrote: Flea Wong globa...@gmail.com javascript: writes: Hi! I'll take the third question first: 3. Why the different function call subtotal (*without* Dot, see Apple) vs .subtotal (*with* Dot, see Orange) for extend-type vs inline implementation of Fruit? You should always use (subtotal fruit). That with an inline implementation which is backed by some generated interface there is a .subtotal method is a pure implementation detail you shouldn't rely on. I.e., (.subtotal fruit) is no function call but a Java interop method call. Ok. Guess it make sense. But it seems rather inconsistent to me. 1. Why *doesn't* extend-type (see Banana) work when implementing protocol Fruit in a different namespace It does work, but since Banana doesn't extend Fruit inline, the corresponding Fruit interface has no .subtotal method, so you cannot call it using (.subtotal banana) but (subtotal banana) will work. I've tried (subtotal (Banana 2)) - as you've suggested (without '.') i get compile error: Unable to resolve symbol: subtotal in this context. So in it doesn't work. I don't understand how you got it to work. AFAIK, extend-type across ns does not work - with or without the '.'. 2. Why *does* inline implementation (see Apple) work when implementing protocol Fruit in a different namespace Calling (.subtotal apple) works, because it's implemented inline and so the corresponding interface has that method and you can call it using Java interop which (.subtotal apple) is. Ok. Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: A few String functions we could implement in Clojure?
I have voted your issue up, and added a comment. Thanks for the link :-) -- Pierre Masci On 1 August 2014 11:16, Bozhidar Batsov bozhidar.bat...@gmail.com wrote: I recently raised a similar point regarding `starts-with?` and `ends-with?` (link - http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1449) and it seems that Clojure's team acknowledges that this is valid reasoning. I think you should open a ticket as well as the case you present is pretty much the same. With ClojureScript and cljx it makes much more sense now to create portable interfaces that it used to before (in the era of Java-only Clojure). On Saturday, July 19, 2014 6:56:44 PM UTC+3, Pierre Masci wrote: Thank you for your insight Andy :-) Interesting question Bruce. -- Pierre Masci On 19 July 2014 16:49, Andy Fingerhut andy.fi...@gmail.com wrote: I would have to defer that question to someone who makes decisions regarding what goes into Clojure/ClojureScript, and what does not. Of course, anyone else is free to create libraries that try to make portability between those two platforms easier. Perhaps someone has already taken a go at creating such a thing? I haven't used ClojureScript myself yet, so haven't looked for anything in that area. Andy On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Bruce Durling b...@otfrom.com wrote: Andy, How much of this reasoning do you think changes when we starting thinking about being hosted on multiple platforms (I'm thinking specifically clojure/clojurescript and cljx)? cheers, Bruce On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.fi...@gmail.com wrote: Pierre: I maintain the cheatsheet, and I put .indexOf and .lastIndexOf on there since they are probably the most common thing I saw asked about that is in the Java API but not the Clojure API, for strings. There are also links to whole Java classes and their entire API, e.g. for file I/O, for which there is no Clojure equivalent, since file I/O is a common need. Clojure is meant to be a hosted language, not hiding its host platform, but making it easily callable. If there are entire Java classes that meet very common needs that aren't mentioned on the cheatsheet, I would consider adding links to their documentation pages. I don't want to fill up the cheatsheet with many individual Java methods, though. As for why there are not Clojure equivalents of particular Java API methods, I think the reasoning might be similar (it has likely been discussed publicly, but I don't have a link handy) -- don't create a large number of Clojure functions that do nothing more than what the equivalent Java APIs do. Andy On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Pierre Masci mas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, just nit picking about Clojure's String API. I've been comparing it with Java's, and I noticed that (not surprisingly) they are very similar. There are just 2-3 functions that exist in Java but don't have an equivalent in Clojure. I was wondering if they could be worth adding to clojure.string : (.indexOf s c) and (.lastIndexOf c) (.startsWith s danc) and (.endsWith s ing) (.charAt s 5) same as (get s 5) but expresses a clearer intent. It's less general than (get) though as it only applies to Strings, so that might be unnecessary sugar. .indexOf and .lastIndexOf are indicated in the Clojure Cheatsheet, maybe .startsWith and .endsWith also deserve to be mentioned there? I've been wondering why some functions have been ported, like (lower-case) for (.toLowerCase), but not the ones mentioned above. I told you it was nit picking (^c^) Clojure's API is awesome as it is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and
Re: A few String functions we could implement in Clojure?
I recently hit exactly this question in a ClojureScript app I’m writing. It just so happens that Javascript provides a .indexOf method which is, as near as dammit, the same as the one provided by Java. So in this instance, portability isn’t an issue. But having said that, I would still prefer to see this supported natively in Clojure, even if it’s just a wrapper around the interop. Using interop to do things that are as generic as simple string manipulation just feels messy. -- paul.butcher-msgCount++ Silverstone, Brands Hatch, Donington Park... Who says I have a one track mind? http://www.paulbutcher.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbutcher Skype: paulrabutcher Author of Seven Concurrency Models in Seven Weeks: When Threads Unravel http://pragprog.com/book/pb7con On 19 July 2014 at 16:49:33, Andy Fingerhut (andy.finger...@gmail.com) wrote: I would have to defer that question to someone who makes decisions regarding what goes into Clojure/ClojureScript, and what does not. Of course, anyone else is free to create libraries that try to make portability between those two platforms easier. Perhaps someone has already taken a go at creating such a thing? I haven't used ClojureScript myself yet, so haven't looked for anything in that area. Andy On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Bruce Durling b...@otfrom.com wrote: Andy, How much of this reasoning do you think changes when we starting thinking about being hosted on multiple platforms (I'm thinking specifically clojure/clojurescript and cljx)? cheers, Bruce On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote: Pierre: I maintain the cheatsheet, and I put .indexOf and .lastIndexOf on there since they are probably the most common thing I saw asked about that is in the Java API but not the Clojure API, for strings. There are also links to whole Java classes and their entire API, e.g. for file I/O, for which there is no Clojure equivalent, since file I/O is a common need. Clojure is meant to be a hosted language, not hiding its host platform, but making it easily callable. If there are entire Java classes that meet very common needs that aren't mentioned on the cheatsheet, I would consider adding links to their documentation pages. I don't want to fill up the cheatsheet with many individual Java methods, though. As for why there are not Clojure equivalents of particular Java API methods, I think the reasoning might be similar (it has likely been discussed publicly, but I don't have a link handy) -- don't create a large number of Clojure functions that do nothing more than what the equivalent Java APIs do. Andy On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Pierre Masci mas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, just nit picking about Clojure's String API. I've been comparing it with Java's, and I noticed that (not surprisingly) they are very similar. There are just 2-3 functions that exist in Java but don't have an equivalent in Clojure. I was wondering if they could be worth adding to clojure.string : (.indexOf s c) and (.lastIndexOf c) (.startsWith s danc) and (.endsWith s ing) (.charAt s 5) same as (get s 5) but expresses a clearer intent. It's less general than (get) though as it only applies to Strings, so that might be unnecessary sugar. .indexOf and .lastIndexOf are indicated in the Clojure Cheatsheet, maybe .startsWith and .endsWith also deserve to be mentioned there? I've been wondering why some functions have been ported, like (lower-case) for (.toLowerCase), but not the ones mentioned above. I told you it was nit picking (^c^) Clojure's API is awesome as it is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
Re: ANN: Namespace browser for Emacs users
It's very nice, but it breaks for me because I have used (set! *print-length* 200) in my repl-options. When this bit of code is run (let* ((form (sort (map name (keys (ns-publics (quote %s)) (vars (cider-eval-and-get-value (format form namespace The last value of vars ends up as \.\.\. rather than a string. Is this more of an issue with cider? Phil Bozhidar Batsov bozhidar.bat...@gmail.com writes: Nicely done! As you might know I'm cider's maintainer and I actually had a namespace browser on the roadmap. :-) I'd like to invite you to transfer the project to the official clojure-emacs github organisation (to increase the package's visibility and to make easier for the cider team to help you with the maintenance). I hope to eventually include cider-browse-ns in the standard cider package. On Monday, July 28, 2014 5:48:20 AM UTC+3, John Andrews wrote: Emacs users: I have put together a namespace browser which builds upon the existing functionality of Cider. It is in early stages of development but I find it quite useful. Check it out! https://github.com/jxa/cider-browse-ns -- Phillip Lord, Phone: +44 (0) 191 222 7827 Lecturer in Bioinformatics, Email: phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk School of Computing Science, http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/phillip.lord Room 914 Claremont Tower, skype: russet_apples Newcastle University, twitter: phillord NE1 7RU -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: CLJS Function clobbering js function of same name
js/foo does not resolve to the global namespace. David On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Sam Ritchie sritchi...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, I ran into this last night when trying to port some ancient JS in our project over to cljs. I was defining an om component called users-typeahead, and in the (did-mount ...) implementation calling a bare javascript function called js/users_typeahead. At the repl, the latter worked great; INSIDE the did-mount implementation, js/users_typeahead resolved to a reference to the enclosing function itself. My expectation was that, with Clojurescript's namespacing, js/func_name would always resolve to the top-level global namespace. Instead, Here's a minimal reproduction: (.log js/console Hi!) ;; logs Hi! (defn console [s] (.log js/console s)) (console Hi!) ;; throws Compilation error: TypeError: undefined is not a function What do you think? Expected behavior, or just an edge case to avoid? -- Sam Ritchie (@sritchie) Paddleguru Co-Founder 703.863.8561 www.paddleguru.com Twitter // Facebook -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
clojure + clojure-contrib offline documentation
I have noticed that gh-pages are no more in-sync with the latest developments of the code, especially after clojure-contrib has been split in separate repositories. I would like to ask if there is something similar to: curl-L https://github.com/clojure/clojure/archive/gh-pages.tar.gz | tar xvzf - but for clojure.github.io, which contains everything. Thank you very much! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
ANN: Joplin -- flexible database migration and seeding
Available on Github; https://github.com/juxt/joplin Joplin tries to solve the problems that arise when dealing with complicated systems consisting of multiple datastores. It lets you define and reason about environments (for instance dev, staging, UAT, prod). Joplin lets you declare your databases, migrators, seed functions up front and combine them into different environments. It can be used via a leiningen plugin or be called programatically. Joplin comes with plugins for SQL/JDBC databases, Datomic, ElasticSearch, Cassandra and Zookeeper. It is built with extensibility in mind, adding more stores is done by a handful of multi-methods. Joplin is built on top of ragtime https://github.com/weavejester/ragtime. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
honeysql tagged literal problem
Trying to do a #sql/call with honeysql, like [#sql/call [:unpackValue probe-field :row]] where probe-field is a local variable, it builds a SqlCall object with symbol probe-field, instead of using the value in the probe-field variable. I guess, then, that tagged literal handlers are passed symbols before they've been resolved? Is there a workaround for this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Transposing a map and back again
Is there a standard/library function to transpose a map from key-value to
value-keys?
I've met this task many times before, and I'm sure others have too. Here is the
code I'm using, mildly highlighted by Google
Groups. I used to copy-paste from Pygments.org
http://pygments.org/demo/506245/, but it seems to no longer work.
(defn transpose
Transposes a map of the form k_i - v_i into v_j - #{k_j1 k_j2 ...}
[m]
(reduce (fn [acc [k v]]
(assoc acc v
(conj (get acc v #{}) k)))
{} m))
(transpose {:a 1 :b 1 :c 2 :d 4 :e 2 :f 1}) ;= {4 #{:d}, 2 #{:c :e}, 1
#{:a :b :f}}
(defn inverse-transpose
Transposes back a map of the form v_i - #{k_i1 k_12 ...} into k_j -
v_j
[m]
(into {} (mapcat (fn [[v ks]]
(map #(vector %1 %2) ks (repeat v)))
m)))
(inverse-transpose (transpose {:a 1 :b 1 :c 2 :d 4 :e 2 :f 1})) ;= {:d 4, :c
2, :e 2, :a 1, :b 1, :f 1}
(let [m {:a 1 :b 1 :c 2 :d 4 :e 2 :f 1}]
(= m (inverse-transpose (transpose m ;= true
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Transposing a map and back again
clojure.set/map-invert is the closest I can think of in the functions
included with Clojure to your transpose function, but it does not handle
duplicate values the way your transpose does.
Andy
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Bruno Kim Medeiros Cesar
brunokim...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a standard/library function to transpose a map from key-value to
value-keys?
I've met this task many times before, and I'm sure others have too. Here is
the code I'm using, mildly highlighted by Google
Groups. I used to copy-paste from Pygments.org
http://pygments.org/demo/506245/, but it seems to no longer work.
(defn transpose
Transposes a map of the form k_i - v_i into v_j - #{k_j1 k_j2 ...}
[m]
(reduce (fn [acc [k v]]
(assoc acc v
(conj (get acc v #{}) k)))
{} m))
(transpose {:a 1 :b 1 :c 2 :d 4 :e 2 :f 1}) ;= {4 #{:d}, 2 #{:c :e}, 1
#{:a :b :f}}
(defn inverse-transpose
Transposes back a map of the form v_i - #{k_i1 k_12 ...} into k_j -
v_j
[m]
(into {} (mapcat (fn [[v ks]]
(map #(vector %1 %2) ks (repeat v)))
m)))
(inverse-transpose (transpose {:a 1 :b 1 :c 2 :d 4 :e 2 :f 1})) ;= {:d 4,
:c 2, :e 2, :a 1, :b 1, :f 1}
(let [m {:a 1 :b 1 :c 2 :d 4 :e 2 :f 1}]
(= m (inverse-transpose (transpose m ;= true
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
ANN: Om 0.7.0
I'm happy to announce Om 0.7.0. The biggest change is depending on ClojureScript 0.0-2277 and React 0.11.1. There's a breaking change around the :ctor option to om.core/root which is now renamed :descriptor. Check the om.core/root docstring for more details. As it's been a long while between releases there may very well be subtle issues lurking about. Any and all feedback welcome! https://github.com/swannodette/om David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ANN: Om 0.7.0
Oops forgot to mention the big enhancement - multimethods and anonymous functions should now Just Work(TM) as component constructors. There's no longer any need to hack - a unique React class is automatically constructed for every Om component constructor function. David On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:36 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote: I'm happy to announce Om 0.7.0. The biggest change is depending on ClojureScript 0.0-2277 and React 0.11.1. There's a breaking change around the :ctor option to om.core/root which is now renamed :descriptor. Check the om.core/root docstring for more details. As it's been a long while between releases there may very well be subtle issues lurking about. Any and all feedback welcome! https://github.com/swannodette/om David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ANN: Om 0.7.0
Thanx a lot guys! The biggest change is depending on ClojureScript 0.0-2277 and BTW the Using it section of README.md still says 0.0-2173: (defproject foo 0.1.0 ... :dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure 1.5.1] [org.clojure/clojurescript 0.0-2173] [om 0.7.0]] ...) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ANN: Om 0.7.0
Thanks for the correction, fixed! On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Rostislav Svoboda rostislav.svob...@gmail.com wrote: Thanx a lot guys! The biggest change is depending on ClojureScript 0.0-2277 and BTW the Using it section of README.md still says 0.0-2173: (defproject foo 0.1.0 ... :dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure 1.5.1] [org.clojure/clojurescript 0.0-2173] [om 0.7.0]] ...) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[ANN] Grimoire 0.3.0
For those of you who didn't notice the ten minutes of 500 pages as I upgraded, I'm delighted to announce the Grimoire's 3rd release! This version would not have been possible without Robert Stuttaford, who was a huge help in porting Grimoire off of the original Jekyll back end to a real Ring server. Thanks also to Andy Fingerhut, thanks to whom Grimoire now incorporates the Thalia extended docstrings. So what's new? - HTML and plain text API! see http://grimoire.arrdem.com/api for details. - Extended unofficial docstrings from Andy. - Pervasive edit links. If it's templated, you can submit edits to it. - Redesigned examples system which allows for even easier contribution. - Changes to symbol munging which may have broken bookmarks. This release breaks the cider-grimoire command for symbols with punctuation and probably breaks some favorites as I took the opportunity to discard some symbol munging which was really a Jekyll workaround. In retrospect I shouldn't have mucked with that for backwards compatibility, but live and learn. Andyf's cheat sheet should be updated later today and the updated munge function should appear in next week's Cider 0.7.0. Comments and complaints are welcome here and on the bug tracker over at https://github.com/arrdem/grimoire/issues. Cheers! Reid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: clojure + clojure-contrib offline documentation
I think clojure.github.io is just the gh-pages of all the individual projects under github.com/clojure, so you should be able to grab the gh-pages of each one. For example, https://github.com/clojure/tools.namespace/tree/gh-pages The root index at clojure.github.io is just another repo at https://github.com/clojure/clojure.github.com -S On Friday, August 1, 2014 12:26:51 PM UTC-4, Andrea Richiardi wrote: I have noticed that gh-pages are no more in-sync with the latest developments of the code, especially after clojure-contrib has been split in separate repositories. I would like to ask if there is something similar to: curl-L https://github.com/clojure/clojure/archive/gh-pages.tar.gz | tar xvzf - but for clojure.github.io, which contains everything. Thank you very much! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [ClojureScript] Re: ANN: Om 0.7.0
That's awesome, thank you for the amazing work, David! Are there any plans to merge the ind-components branch into master any time soonish? On 1 August 2014 21:29, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the correction, fixed! On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Rostislav Svoboda rostislav.svob...@gmail.com wrote: Thanx a lot guys! The biggest change is depending on ClojureScript 0.0-2277 and BTW the Using it section of README.md still says 0.0-2173: (defproject foo 0.1.0 ... :dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure 1.5.1] [org.clojure/clojurescript 0.0-2173] [om 0.7.0]] ...) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ClojureScript group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
ANN: ClojureScript 0.0-2280
ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source code. README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript New release version: 0.0-2280 Leiningen dependency information: [org.clojure/clojurescript 0.0-2280] ### Changes * depend on latest org.clojure/google-closure-library ### Fixes * fix constants table bug where keywords did not include precomputed hash-code -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Help Getting Sente to Work
Hey Daniel, Yes, that's true. I've run into that, as I've gotten used to a lot of gymnastics when setting up these tools, lol. So thanks for the heads up. Those friendly reminders are needed :) Tim Washington Interruptsoftware.com http://interruptsoftware.com On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Daniel Kersten dkers...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Timothy, I just wanted to note that you can control the port Austin uses through environment variables. I do this so I can port forward, for example. This probably won't help you though, as httpkit and the browser repl can't run on the same port. On 30 Jul 2014 16:24, Timothy Washington twash...@gmail.com wrote: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[ANN] clojure.java.jdbc 0.3.5
Clojure wrapper for JDBC database access. https://github.com/clojure/java.jdbc • Release 0.3.5 on 2014-08-01 • Reflection warnings on executeUpdate addressed. • HSQLDB and SQLite in-memory strings are now accepted JDBC-94. • Add support for readonly transactions via :read-only? JDBC-93. (should be up on Maven soon) Thanks to Brian Craft for highlighting the performance hotspot due to reflection in the executeUpdate code! Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ Perfection is the enemy of the good. -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: Don't understand inline vs extend-type implementation of defprotocol across namespaces
On Jul 31, 2014, at 7:19 PM, Flea Wong globalf...@gmail.com wrote:
(ns crecords.trec
(:require [crecords.tproc :refer [Fruit]]))
You'll need to :refer subtotal here as well:
(ns crecords.trec
(:require [crecords.tproc :refer [Fruit]]))
Then this will work:
(defn f1 []
(println Banana Subtotal: (subtotal (Banana. 2
Note: Banana. not Banana
I think it's more idiomatic to use -RecordName rather than RecordName. BTW.
I can't answer your questions directly but here's what I understand is
happening so maybe this will answer them indirectly:
defprotocol creates both the type and the top-level functions. Those top-level
functions expect to call methods on their argument (I think) but those methods
are defined elsewhere (in defrecord, extend-type, etc).
defrecord creates a class that has methods. I think that those methods can be
resolved as function calls that give the impression you really have a top-level
function.
extend-type provides implementations of methods that can be invoked on objects
of the extended type.
(subtotal ..) is a regular function call - which for a record can be mapped to
a method call automatically it seems - and (.subtotal ..) is a Java interop
call invoking a method directly on an object.
Looking at what Vars are defined in each of your namespaces gives some insight
into this:
user= (require 'crecords.tproc)
nil
user= (ns crecords.tproc)
nil
crecords.tproc= (ns-publics *ns*)
{Fruit #'crecords.tproc/Fruit, map-Orange #'crecords.tproc/map-Orange,
subtotal #'crecords.tproc/subtotal, -main #'crecords.tproc/-main, -Orange
#'crecords.tproc/-Orange}
crecords.tproc= (require 'crecords.trec)
nil
crecords.tproc= (ns crecords.trec)
nil
crecords.trec= (ns-publics *ns*)
{f2 #'crecords.trec/f2, -Apple #'crecords.trec/-Apple, -Banana
#'crecords.trec/-Banana, map-Banana #'crecords.trec/map-Banana, -main
#'crecords.trec/-main, f1 #'crecords.trec/f1, map-Apple
#'crecords.trec/map-Apple}
Hope that helps?
Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
Perfection is the enemy of the good.
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [ANN] Grimoire 0.3.0
This is very cool. Given the URL structure, have you given any thought to how contrib libraries might be integrated into this in future? Sean On Aug 1, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Reid McKenzie rmckenzi...@gmail.com wrote: For those of you who didn't notice the ten minutes of 500 pages as I upgraded, I'm delighted to announce the Grimoire's 3rd release! This version would not have been possible without Robert Stuttaford, who was a huge help in porting Grimoire off of the original Jekyll back end to a real Ring server. Thanks also to Andy Fingerhut, thanks to whom Grimoire now incorporates the Thalia extended docstrings. So what's new? - HTML and plain text API! see http://grimoire.arrdem.com/api for details. - Extended unofficial docstrings from Andy. - Pervasive edit links. If it's templated, you can submit edits to it. - Redesigned examples system which allows for even easier contribution. - Changes to symbol munging which may have broken bookmarks. This release breaks the cider-grimoire command for symbols with punctuation and probably breaks some favorites as I took the opportunity to discard some symbol munging which was really a Jekyll workaround. In retrospect I shouldn't have mucked with that for backwards compatibility, but live and learn. Andyf's cheat sheet should be updated later today and the updated munge function should appear in next week's Cider 0.7.0. Comments and complaints are welcome here and on the bug tracker over at https://github.com/arrdem/grimoire/issues. Cheers! Reid signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [ANN] Grimoire 0.3.0
Hey Sean, It's something I've thought about and will probably continue to decline as a feature. cross-clj already does the easy half of that job: providing HTML documentation and does it at least as well as Grimoire does. Sure Grimoire could be extended to provide the same content, but I see the value of Grimoire in its examples and extended documentation of Core rather than in being a HTML render of the existing documentation. As providing these things for contrib libraries is a significant undertaking and there's already plenty to do in cleaning up the existing Core docs I'm not likely to do it myself. However I'm open to persuasion and PRs. Reid On 08/01/2014 06:47 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: This is very cool. Given the URL structure, have you given any thought to how contrib libraries might be integrated into this in future? Sean On Aug 1, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Reid McKenzie rmckenzi...@gmail.com wrote: For those of you who didn't notice the ten minutes of 500 pages as I upgraded, I'm delighted to announce the Grimoire's 3rd release! This version would not have been possible without Robert Stuttaford, who was a huge help in porting Grimoire off of the original Jekyll back end to a real Ring server. Thanks also to Andy Fingerhut, thanks to whom Grimoire now incorporates the Thalia extended docstrings. So what's new? - HTML and plain text API! see http://grimoire.arrdem.com/api for details. - Extended unofficial docstrings from Andy. - Pervasive edit links. If it's templated, you can submit edits to it. - Redesigned examples system which allows for even easier contribution. - Changes to symbol munging which may have broken bookmarks. This release breaks the cider-grimoire command for symbols with punctuation and probably breaks some favorites as I took the opportunity to discard some symbol munging which was really a Jekyll workaround. In retrospect I shouldn't have mucked with that for backwards compatibility, but live and learn. Andyf's cheat sheet should be updated later today and the updated munge function should appear in next week's Cider 0.7.0. Comments and complaints are welcome here and on the bug tracker over at https://github.com/arrdem/grimoire/issues. Cheers! Reid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [ANN] Grimoire 0.3.0
On Aug 1, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Reid McKenzie rmckenzi...@gmail.com wrote: It's something I've thought about and will probably continue to decline as a feature. cross-clj already does the easy half of that job: providing HTML documentation and does it at least as well as Grimoire does. Ah, I hadn't looked at cross-clj before - that is super nice! Sure Grimoire could be extended to provide the same content, but I see the value of Grimoire in its examples and extended documentation of Core rather than in being a HTML render of the existing documentation. Indeed. I only asked because clojuredocs.org did have a lot of the old contrib in there (with some examples etc) and wondered whether Grimoire might be a complete replacement... But I think you're right that there's just too much to cover with the way contrib is growing and evolving these days - and we have clojure-doc.org for more extensive, community-maintained documentation that provides guides to using contrib libraries etc. In addition, contrib libraries probably don't lend themselves to isolated examples the way the core Clojure namespaces do. Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ Perfection is the enemy of the good. -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [ANN] Grimoire 0.3.0
On 08/01/2014 09:03 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: Ah, I hadn't looked at cross-clj before - that is super nice! Yeah! I'm still very impressed by their coverage of the Clojure ecosystem. I only asked because clojuredocs.org did have a lot of the old contrib in there (with some examples etc) and wondered whether Grimoire might be a complete replacement... But I think you're right that there's just too much to cover with the way contrib is growing and evolving these days - and we have clojure-doc.org for more extensive, community-maintained documentation that provides guides to using contrib libraries etc. In addition, contrib libraries probably don't lend themselves to isolated examples the way the core Clojure namespaces do. Definitely. I see Grimoire as an overgrown edition of Andyf's cheatsheet. Even small example projects let alone long form tutorials are totally out of scope and a much better fit for clojure-doc's article format. Search and quick reference utility are going to to be my main goals going forwards. Reid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [ANN] Grimoire 0.3.0
On Saturday, August 2, 2014, Reid McKenzie rmckenzi...@gmail.com wrote: For those of you who didn't notice the ten minutes of 500 pages as I upgraded, I'm delighted to announce the Grimoire's 3rd release! This version would not have been possible without Robert Stuttaford, who was a huge help in porting Grimoire off of the original Jekyll back end to a real Ring server. Thanks also to Andy Fingerhut, thanks to whom Grimoire now incorporates the Thalia extended docstrings. So what's new? - HTML and plain text API! see http://grimoire.arrdem.com/api for details. - Extended unofficial docstrings from Andy. - Pervasive edit links. If it's templated, you can submit edits to it. - Redesigned examples system which allows for even easier contribution. - Changes to symbol munging which may have broken bookmarks. This release breaks the cider-grimoire command for symbols with punctuation and probably breaks some favorites as I took the opportunity to discard some symbol munging which was really a Jekyll workaround. In retrospect I shouldn't have mucked with that for backwards compatibility, but live and learn. Andyf's cheat sheet should be updated later today and the updated munge function should appear in next week's Cider 0.7.0. Just a quick note. I actually updated cider-grimoire for 0.3 a few hours before you released it, so everybody using the latest snapshot should be fine. I hope that we'll finally get to release CIDER 0.7 on Monday. I've also implemented support for the text API (but haven't commited yet) which should make it into the release. Comments and complaints are welcome here and on the bug tracker over at https://github.com/arrdem/grimoire/issues. Cheers! Reid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com javascript:; Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:; For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:;. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
