Re: Suggestion for Java Clojure code, use of checkstyle or code formatter
+1 for running all the code under src/jvm through some code formatter that uses something at least similar to the Sun Java conventions. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:59 PM, BerlinBrown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote: I was curious about how some of the clojure code worked and observed that the coding style is a little bit non idiomatic from typical Java coding conventions. E.g. there aren't any javadoc comments on methods or classes, non standard indents. Something like checkstyle might prove useful. http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/ While, every programmer balks at conventions, I am sure there is a mountain of evidence for increased overall maintenance and other benefits. I know, I will get suggestions for clojure/lisp coding style. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Suggestion for Java Clojure code, use of checkstyle or code formatter
Javadoc would be nice, but I do note that Rich's Java code is pretty darn clear ;) I also note the indentation style is similar to Whitesmith's according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style. I've always preferred the BSD curly brace level matching convention over the KR derivatives. That said aren't we all hacking on Clojure because we're done with this convention thing? ;) David On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.comwrote: Why you guys want to suppress all the fun from clojure ? ;-) :-p 2009/3/24 Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com +1 for running all the code under src/jvm through some code formatter that uses something at least similar to the Sun Java conventions. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:59 PM, BerlinBrown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote: I was curious about how some of the clojure code worked and observed that the coding style is a little bit non idiomatic from typical Java coding conventions. E.g. there aren't any javadoc comments on methods or classes, non standard indents. Something like checkstyle might prove useful. http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/ While, every programmer balks at conventions, I am sure there is a mountain of evidence for increased overall maintenance and other benefits. I know, I will get suggestions for clojure/lisp coding style. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Suggestion for Java Clojure code, use of checkstyle or code formatter
Even though I don't really care for the indentation style used, it is (unlike most projects) consistent and clear. Joshua On Mar 24, 8:40 am, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote: Javadoc would be nice, but I do note that Rich's Java code is pretty darn clear ;) I also note the indentation style is similar to Whitesmith's according to Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style. I've always preferred the BSD curly brace level matching convention over the KR derivatives. That said aren't we all hacking on Clojure because we're done with this convention thing? ;) David On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.comwrote: Why you guys want to suppress all the fun from clojure ? ;-) :-p 2009/3/24 Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com +1 for running all the code under src/jvm through some code formatter that uses something at least similar to the Sun Java conventions. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:59 PM, BerlinBrown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote: I was curious about how some of the clojure code worked and observed that the coding style is a little bit non idiomatic from typical Java coding conventions. E.g. there aren't any javadoc comments on methods or classes, non standard indents. Something like checkstyle might prove useful. http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/ While, every programmer balks at conventions, I am sure there is a mountain of evidence for increased overall maintenance and other benefits. I know, I will get suggestions for clojure/lisp coding style. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Suggestion for Java Clojure code, use of checkstyle or code formatter
You mean by Sun Norvig conventions right ? ;) http://code.google.com/p/clojure/issues/detail?id=16q=prettycolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Reporter%20Owner%20Summary On Mar 24, 1:46 am, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for running all the code under src/jvm through some code formatter that uses something at least similar to the Sun Java conventions. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:59 PM, BerlinBrown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote: I was curious about how some of the clojure code worked and observed that the coding style is a little bit non idiomatic from typical Java coding conventions. E.g. there aren't any javadoc comments on methods or classes, non standard indents. Something like checkstyle might prove useful. http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/ While, every programmer balks at conventions, I am sure there is a mountain of evidence for increased overall maintenance and other benefits. I know, I will get suggestions for clojure/lisp coding style. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Suggestion for Java Clojure code, use of checkstyle or code formatter
On Mar 24, 7:46 am, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for running all the code under src/jvm through some code formatter that uses something at least similar to the Sun Java conventions. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:59 PM, BerlinBrown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote: I was curious about how some of the clojure code worked and observed that the coding style is a little bit non idiomatic from typical Java coding conventions. E.g. there aren't any javadoc comments on methods or classes, non standard indents. Something like checkstyle might prove useful. http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/ While, every programmer balks at conventions, I am sure there is a mountain of evidence for increased overall maintenance and other benefits. I know, I will get suggestions for clojure/lisp coding style. My predictive powers are improving. When I saw the OP I subvocalized, Seems like something Volkmann would endorse. ;-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Suggestion for Java Clojure code, use of checkstyle or code formatter
+1 Using regular and proper formatting assists in submitting patches. A little Javadoc would be nice as well. On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for running all the code under src/jvm through some code formatter that uses something at least similar to the Sun Java conventions. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:59 PM, BerlinBrown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote: I was curious about how some of the clojure code worked and observed that the coding style is a little bit non idiomatic from typical Java coding conventions. E.g. there aren't any javadoc comments on methods or classes, non standard indents. Something like checkstyle might prove useful. http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/ While, every programmer balks at conventions, I am sure there is a mountain of evidence for increased overall maintenance and other benefits. I know, I will get suggestions for clojure/lisp coding style. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Suggestion for Java Clojure code, use of checkstyle or code formatter
Hi, Am 24.03.2009 um 20:08 schrieb Howard Lewis Ship: Using regular and proper formatting assists in submitting patches. hahaha! If someone submitting a patch ever adhered to a coding convention of any sort. A little Javadoc would be nice as well. Yes. That would definitively be a good a thing, and it is a open issue in the issue list. Sincerely Meikel smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
