[CODE4LIB] Join us in Mallorca for Elag 2012 in May !!

2012-01-11 Thread Boheemen, Peter van
We are still waiting for more presentation, workshop or bootcamp proposals.
Join us in Spain in May and send in your proposals 
You can find more information at http://www.elag.org

Cheers.

Peter


[CODE4LIB] Open datasets

2012-01-11 Thread Alexander Johannesen
Hiya,

I'm in the middle of creating a meta data management system (including
merging and persistent identifier management) for a somewhat different
domain (intranets and business integration), but it's based on Topic Maps
and so is well suited to other means of meta data handling / mangling. It's
also going to be open-source, and it might be well-suited to library tasks
as well.

So in order to test the integrity and performance of my system so far I'm
wondering if there's a suitable open dataset of bibliographic records that
aren't too obscure (meaning, I can find the titles at amazon or Open
Library) that you could recommend? More than 1000 records, but less than a
million, maybe?

Regards,

Alex


Re: [CODE4LIB] Open datasets

2012-01-11 Thread Thomas Krichel
  Alexander Johannesen writes

 So in order to test the integrity and performance of my system so far I'm
 wondering if there's a suitable open dataset of bibliographic records that
 aren't too obscure (meaning, I can find the titles at amazon or Open
 Library) that you could recommend? More than 1000 records, but less than a
 million, maybe?

  Look at RePEc at http://repec.org.
 
  You can mirror the dataset from ftp://repec.org but for efficiency
  we can set up some rsync delivery for you.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
  http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
   skype: thomaskrichel


[CODE4LIB] FRBR aggravating wotsits (was Re: [CODE4LIB] Calling all Maryland, DC, and Virginia folk Save the Date)

2012-01-11 Thread Simon Spero
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Joshua Gomez jngo...@library.gwu.eduwrote:


  will be a quick summary of FRBR, and a possible solution for aggregates
 which opens up a whole 'nother can of worms, but allows for some complex
 relationships to be described.


Any summary of the discussion?  I'm slowly writing something on this to
address some issues brought up on the RDA list (but not the FRBR list for
some reason).

Simon


Re: [CODE4LIB] Open datasets

2012-01-11 Thread LeVan,Ralph
http://staff.oclc.org/~levan/PearsTraining/scifi.usmarc has 10,000 marc
records in it.  They are part of the old SiteSearch system that OCLC
released as open source.  They date back to 2002 and will not contain
any Unicode, if you were hoping to include that as part of your testing.

Ralph

-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Alexander Johannesen
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:36 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Open datasets

Hiya,

I'm in the middle of creating a meta data management system (including
merging and persistent identifier management) for a somewhat different
domain (intranets and business integration), but it's based on Topic
Maps
and so is well suited to other means of meta data handling / mangling.
It's
also going to be open-source, and it might be well-suited to library
tasks
as well.

So in order to test the integrity and performance of my system so far
I'm
wondering if there's a suitable open dataset of bibliographic records
that
aren't too obscure (meaning, I can find the titles at amazon or Open
Library) that you could recommend? More than 1000 records, but less than
a
million, maybe?

Regards,

Alex


Re: [CODE4LIB] Open datasets

2012-01-11 Thread Simon Spero
You can get anything you want
At Brewster Kahle's restaurant.
http://openlibrary.org/data#bulk_download

Simon

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM, LeVan,Ralph le...@oclc.org wrote:

 http://staff.oclc.org/~levan/PearsTraining/scifi.usmarc has 10,000 marc
 records in it.  They are part of the old SiteSearch system that OCLC
 released as open source.  They date back to 2002 and will not contain
 any Unicode, if you were hoping to include that as part of your testing.

 Ralph

 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
 Alexander Johannesen
 Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:36 AM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: Open datasets

 Hiya,

 I'm in the middle of creating a meta data management system (including
 merging and persistent identifier management) for a somewhat different
 domain (intranets and business integration), but it's based on Topic
 Maps
 and so is well suited to other means of meta data handling / mangling.
 It's
 also going to be open-source, and it might be well-suited to library
 tasks
 as well.

 So in order to test the integrity and performance of my system so far
 I'm
 wondering if there's a suitable open dataset of bibliographic records
 that
 aren't too obscure (meaning, I can find the titles at amazon or Open
 Library) that you could recommend? More than 1000 records, but less than
 a
 million, maybe?

 Regards,

 Alex



Re: [CODE4LIB] Obvious answer to registration limitations

2012-01-11 Thread Jim Safley
I like the idea of a code4lib conference franchise similar to
THATCamp: http://thatcamp.org/. I happen to know that Amanda French,
THATCamp Coordinator, is interested in talking with the code4lib
coordinators about the distributed conference model. Her expertise on
the subject would be enlightening. If you're interested, she can be
contacted at i...@thatcamp.org.

Jim

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:02 PM, BRIAN TINGLE
brian.tingle.cdlib@gmail.com wrote:
 On Dec 22, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Karen Schneider wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Chris Fitzpatrick cf...@stanford.eduwrote:

 +1 for Terry's idea of limiting the number of participants each
 institution can send. I don't know what this number would be, but I think
 it would help increase diversity, since it might get more people working in
 smaller organizations into the conference.


 Trying this again... +1. I'm no math major, but seems to me this would also
 increase the sheer number of institutions represented at the conference,
 another important element of diversity, so that C4L doesn't inadvertently
 become a gathering for a handful of institutions.


 0:  I've only been to code4lib twice (the first one and the last one).  I'm 
 not sure how much of an issue institutional diversity is.  Local places are 
 always going to want to send more because it is a cheaper event.  And as 
 someone from a larger institution, I have some bias. (and all of the UC is 
 legally one institution for that matter, so would it be by UC campus?  UC 
 department?  Each individual library?).  I guess as long as the cap were high 
 enough (higher than 2, maybe 5 or 10) this would probably be okay.  I don't 
 think this gets you that much as far as opening up more spots.

 +1 to a lottery, maybe for the last 50% of the available slots, seems like 
 the most fair method to me.  People with proposals in can land rush for the 
 first slots.  Then it is a lottery for folks who see code4lib as just another 
 conference.

 +1 to selling some tickets via ircbot; by the way, I've always understood 
 code4lib to be an irc channel with a mailing list; and the code4lib 
 conference was like its annual meeting.  I always feel guilty that I never 
 hang out in the channel (but I spent way too much time on irc in 1992, and 
 the thought of it sort of makes me ill).  I could totally see the first batch 
 of (of maybe 10?) tickets being distributed by irc bot at some random time.  
 But using a bot to buy the ticket from the bot should not be allowed, real 
 people would have to hang out on the channel to get the first spots.

 Also, is there any interest in a San Francisco Bay Area Code For Libraries 
 Regional Affiliate (code4lib-sfbay for short)?

 Just read Ross Singer's response to this.
 I, personally, would like to do with away with the
 regional brand and just call everything by Code4Lib [Location]
 (which is pretty much how we refer to any 'main' conference in the
 past tense, anyway).  This way, there is no 'main' event.  There are
 just events.

 I like that idea; sort of like THATcamp?  I wonder if that would require some 
 sort of dedicated support, like a full time program manager to help 
 administer the conference series?  Part of the appeal of the regionals is 
 that is seems like it would be easier for volunteers to run?  Or are you just 
 talking about the branding and not the organization?


 Also, I do like Declan's idea: sounds like a south by south west version of 
 code4lib?  (I've never been to SXSW, so I'm probably totally wrong about this)


Re: [CODE4LIB] Obvious answer to registration limitations

2012-01-11 Thread Jonathan Rochkind

On 1/11/2012 11:31 AM, Jim Safley wrote:

  I happen to know that Amanda French,
THATCamp Coordinator, is interested in talking with the code4lib
coordinators about the distributed conference model.


Ah, but if you haven't figured it out yet, there pretty much are no such 
thing as 'code4lib coordinators'.


If some people are interested in this, they should investigate, there's 
pretty much nobody who has authority to do it or tell you that you have 
authority.


[CODE4LIB] Crafting MARC records to ePub files

2012-01-11 Thread stuart yeates
I help maintain a website ( http://www.nzetc.org/ ) which publishes 
texts of reasonably broad interest (Nineteenth Century New Zealand 
novels, the Official New Zealand War Histories, a couple of literary 
journals, early New Zealand ethnography, etc). We publish to the web and 
as ePub (+PDF in cases where the layout or typography might be important).


Currently we have MARC records that point to the web version, for 
internal use, but we're looking at making a MARCXML file available for 
download by third parties (we anticipate public libraries and perhaps 
school libraries). We'd like to make the MARC records as useful as 
possible to as many people as possible.


I'm looking for specific recommendations of how to code references to 
ePubs in MARC for maximum compatibility with multiple cataloguing systems.


[For those looking at our current ePubs, we're also working to increment 
the version of the standard we use to make them compatible with iTunesU.]


cheers
stuart
--
Stuart Yeates
Library Technology Services http://www.victoria.ac.nz/library/


[CODE4LIB] Embedding XHTML into RDF

2012-01-11 Thread Ethan Gruber
Hi all,

Suppose I have RDF describing an object, and I would like some fairly
free-form human generating description about the object (let's say within
dcterms:description).  Is it semantically acceptable to have XHTML nested
directly in this element or would this be considered uncouth for LOD?

Thanks,
Ethan


Re: [CODE4LIB] Embedding XHTML into RDF

2012-01-11 Thread Robert Sanderson
You might consider the Content in RDF specification:
http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF10/

which describes how to do this in a generic fashion, as opposed to
stuffing it directly into a string literal.

HTH

Rob

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Ethan Gruber ewg4x...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 Suppose I have RDF describing an object, and I would like some fairly
 free-form human generating description about the object (let's say within
 dcterms:description).  Is it semantically acceptable to have XHTML nested
 directly in this element or would this be considered uncouth for LOD?

 Thanks,
 Ethan


Re: [CODE4LIB] Embedding XHTML into RDF

2012-01-11 Thread Simon Spero
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Ethan Gruber ewg4x...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 Suppose I have RDF describing an object, and I would like some
 fairly free-form human generating description about the object (let's say
 within dcterms:description).  Is it semantically acceptable to have XHTML
 nested directly in this element or would this be considered uncouth for LOD?


Free-form human generating is considered uncouth except behind closed
doors, but XML literals are explictly provided for - see
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#dfn-rdf-XMLLiteral

Simon


[CODE4LIB] Digital Archivist Position - Sleepy Hollow, NY

2012-01-11 Thread Sibyl Schaefer
** Apologies for cross posting **

The Rockefeller Archive Center invites applications for a Digital Archivist
position. This individual will oversee the development and management of
the Archive Center’s Digital Library, which will consist of digitized
archival materials, born-digital archival materials, EAD finding aids, and
thematic collections generated by Archive Center staff and scholars.

The Digital Archivist will conduct iterative design and development of the
digital library; manage and automate frequently occurring digital library
tasks; integrate the digital library with the RAC preservation repository
and website platforms; aid in development of policies concerning the
digital library; provide technical assistance in problem-solving tasks;
assist in digital curation and preservation tasks; provide AT database
management, as needed; keep up-to-date in the latest technologies related
to digital humanities, archives, and libraries; and participate in
professional development activities.

Required Minimum Qualifications:
● ALA-accredited MLIS or Masters in Information Science, Archival Science,
or related field
● At least 5 years experience working in archives and library settings
● Demonstrated knowledge of library and archival metadata standards such as
EAD, METS, MODS, DC, PREMIS, MIX
● Proficiency with XML and XSLT
● Knowledge of copyright and permissions issues as they relate to digital
repositories
● Knowledge of usability testing and user experience design
● The ability to work both independently and collaboratively
● Excellent interpersonal and communication skills, both oral and written
● Demonstrated planning and project management skills

Preferred:
● Familiarity with CSS 3, HTML 5, and JavaScript
● Knowledge of content management systems,especially Omeka, Archivists’
Tookit, Drupal and XTF
● Familiarity with JavaScript
● Programming/scripting skills in Perl, Python, or PHP
● Involvement and/or interest in the digital humanities
● Experience working with SQL databases
● Knowledge of accessible website design
● Knowledge of digital preservation practices

About Us:
The Rockefeller Archive Center is a repository of historic documents in a
wide variety of media and a research center dedicated to the study of
philanthropy and the diverse domains shaped by philanthropy. It was
established in 1974 to assemble, preserve, and make accessible the records
of the Rockefeller family and their wide-ranging philanthropic endeavors
(including the Rockefeller Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and
Rockefeller University). Today, the Center's growing holdings include
materials from numerous non-Rockefeller foundations and nonprofit
organizations, making it a premier center for research on philanthropy and
civil society.
It is also a major repository for the personal papers of leaders of the
philanthropic community, Nobel Prize laureates, and world-renowned
investigators in science and medicine. Through the scholars it serves and
the broader community it reaches with its publications, workshops, and
symposia, the Archive Center is a vital resource for research and public
dialogue on the contributions of philanthropy to the well-being of people
throughout the world.

Please submit resume via email or mail to:

Rockefeller Archive Center
15 Dayton Ave
Sleepy Hollow, NY 10591
care...@rockarch.org

Please specify Digital Archivist Position on the subject line of your
email. No phone calls please.