Re: [CODE4LIB] Collection Naming Convention Question

2013-09-07 Thread Matthew Sherman
Thanks for the insight.  I am just taking this over so I am trying to come
up with ways to make the structure more user friendly.  Interestingly the
proceedings collection is actually one of the larger collections with
proceedings and presentations our professors did from a wide variety of
conferences and symposiums.  I want to make it more clear but it is a
matter of coming up with a term that makes sense.  Hence why I was hoping
for thoughts from the community.  So the response is appreciated.


On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Williamson, Kelsey CTR NUWC NWPT 
kelsey.williamson@navy.mil wrote:

 Hi Matt,

 I would wonder about the value of grouping a collection by form rather
 than content. Is that how everything else is grouped? Do your users
 actually browse by collection or do they just search for things? If your
 collection relies on a content type, you might look into different ways of
 displaying the data. You can probably identify subjects or other defining
 bits of metadata by which to group your objects for display.

 I didn't see any response on the list, it's kind of hard question to
 answer because it depends specifically on what your repository is for and
 who is using it. At the very least, conference proceedings might be more
 clear. But I don't think any of your users will bother accessing your
 collection that way unless they already know what is in there. Just my 2
 cents. Good luck!
 Also you might try some more targeted lists for this kind of thing. These
 guys mostly like to argue about code. There is a metadata librarians list
 here: http://metadatalibrarians.monarchos.com/

 R,
 Kelsey

 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
 Matthew Sherman
 Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 11:49 AM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: [CODE4LIB] Collection Naming Convention Question

 Hello Code4Libbers,

 I just took over responsibility for the institutional repository at my
 work and one of the collections is labelled proceedings.  I find this to
 be a rather confusing term even though it is referring to conference and
 symposium proceedings.  It is just not so obvious to someone who has not
 run into that item before.  I was wondering if any other people have a
 category in their repositories for conference and symposium proceedings and
 what you call it.  I am hoping to find a slightly more user friendly name
 so I wanted to see what others have done.  Thanks for any thoughts you can
 provide.

 Matt Sherman
 Digital Content Librarian
 University of Bridgeport



[CODE4LIB] Collection Naming Convention Question

2013-09-06 Thread Matthew Sherman
Hello Code4Libbers,

I just took over responsibility for the institutional repository at my work
and one of the collections is labelled proceedings.  I find this to be a
rather confusing term even though it is referring to conference and
symposium proceedings.  It is just not so obvious to someone who has not
run into that item before.  I was wondering if any other people have a
category in their repositories for conference and symposium proceedings and
what you call it.  I am hoping to find a slightly more user friendly name
so I wanted to see what others have done.  Thanks for any thoughts you can
provide.

Matt Sherman
Digital Content Librarian
University of Bridgeport


Re: [CODE4LIB] Collection Naming Convention Question

2013-09-06 Thread Williamson, Kelsey CTR NUWC NWPT
Hi Matt,

I would wonder about the value of grouping a collection by form rather than 
content. Is that how everything else is grouped? Do your users actually browse 
by collection or do they just search for things? If your collection relies on a 
content type, you might look into different ways of displaying the data. You 
can probably identify subjects or other defining bits of metadata by which to 
group your objects for display. 

I didn't see any response on the list, it's kind of hard question to answer 
because it depends specifically on what your repository is for and who is using 
it. At the very least, conference proceedings might be more clear. But I 
don't think any of your users will bother accessing your collection that way 
unless they already know what is in there. Just my 2 cents. Good luck!
Also you might try some more targeted lists for this kind of thing. These guys 
mostly like to argue about code. There is a metadata librarians list here: 
http://metadatalibrarians.monarchos.com/

R, 
Kelsey

-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Matthew 
Sherman
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 11:49 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Collection Naming Convention Question

Hello Code4Libbers,

I just took over responsibility for the institutional repository at my work and 
one of the collections is labelled proceedings.  I find this to be a rather 
confusing term even though it is referring to conference and symposium 
proceedings.  It is just not so obvious to someone who has not run into that 
item before.  I was wondering if any other people have a category in their 
repositories for conference and symposium proceedings and what you call it.  I 
am hoping to find a slightly more user friendly name so I wanted to see what 
others have done.  Thanks for any thoughts you can provide.

Matt Sherman
Digital Content Librarian
University of Bridgeport


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature