Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread David Kane
Andy,

It is a highly extensible platform, based on .NET and windows.  It is also
open source!  We did install it and have a play around with it.  But not as
much as we would have liked, primarily because of skillset and resource
issues here.

Microsoft have come late into the repository space, and have had a really
good look at the kinds of mistakes others have made.

Let us know how you get on.

David.





On 28 April 2010 14:54, Andrew Ashton andrew_ash...@brown.edu wrote:

 I¹m looking for some background information on Microsoft¹s Zentity (their
 digital repository software).  If anyone has first-hand experience working
 with it, or if you know of institutions that have implemented it, please
 contact me.

 Thanks,

 Andy Ashton
 Senior Research Programmer
 Center for Digital Scholarship, Brown University Library
 andrew_ash...@brown.edu




-- 
David Kane
Systems Librarian
Waterford Institute of Technology
Ireland
http://library.wit.ie/
davidfk...@googlewave.com
T: ++353.51302838
M: ++353.876693212


Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread David Kane
Zentity is entirely consistent with their market strategy. It would be
defeatist of them to take such an attitude. Why would they write software
for a non-microsoft platform?

They have made some good software, which should be useful and is in a good
position to leverge the functionality of other Microsoft products.  For
example, integrating the office suite into the academic publishing lifecycle
could be very useful for academics.

David.



The

On 28 April 2010 15:17, Ethan Gruber ewg4x...@gmail.com wrote:

 It seems to me that the major flaw of the software is that it isn't
 cross-platform, which comes as no surprise.  But I feel Microsoft didn't do
 their market research.  While the financial and business sectors are
 heavily
 reliant on Microsoft servers, American universities, and by extension,
 research libraries, are not.  If they really wanted to make a commitment
 to
 support the academic community as they say on the Zentity website, they
 would have developed it for a platform that the academic community actually
 uses.

 Ethan

 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:11 AM, David Kane dk...@wit.ie wrote:

  Andy,
 
  It is a highly extensible platform, based on .NET and windows.  It is
 also
  open source!  We did install it and have a play around with it.  But not
 as
  much as we would have liked, primarily because of skillset and resource
  issues here.
 
  Microsoft have come late into the repository space, and have had a really
  good look at the kinds of mistakes others have made.
 
  Let us know how you get on.
 
  David.
 
 
 
 
 
  On 28 April 2010 14:54, Andrew Ashton andrew_ash...@brown.edu wrote:
 
   I¹m looking for some background information on Microsoft¹s Zentity
 (their
   digital repository software).  If anyone has first-hand experience
  working
   with it, or if you know of institutions that have implemented it,
 please
   contact me.
  
   Thanks,
  
   Andy Ashton
   Senior Research Programmer
   Center for Digital Scholarship, Brown University Library
   andrew_ash...@brown.edu
  
 
 
 
  --
  David Kane
  Systems Librarian
  Waterford Institute of Technology
  Ireland
  http://library.wit.ie/
  davidfk...@googlewave.com
  T: ++353.51302838
  M: ++353.876693212
 




-- 
David Kane
Systems Librarian
Waterford Institute of Technology
Ireland
http://library.wit.ie/
davidfk...@googlewave.com
T: ++353.51302838
M: ++353.876693212


Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread Cowles, Esme
On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:25 AM, David Kane wrote:

 Why would they write software
 for a non-microsoft platform?

I'll just point out that other OS vendors (Apple, Sun, Ubuntu, etc.) write 
software for other platforms.

-Esme
--
Esme Cowles escow...@ucsd.edu

Men feared witches and burnt women.
 -- Louis Brandeis, Whitney v.  California, concurring


Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread David Kane
So what?

On 28 April 2010 15:37, Cowles, Esme escow...@ucsd.edu wrote:

 On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:25 AM, David Kane wrote:

  Why would they write software
  for a non-microsoft platform?

 I'll just point out that other OS vendors (Apple, Sun, Ubuntu, etc.) write
 software for other platforms.

 -Esme
 --
 Esme Cowles escow...@ucsd.edu

 Men feared witches and burnt women.
  -- Louis Brandeis, Whitney v.  California, concurring




-- 
David Kane
Systems Librarian
Waterford Institute of Technology
Ireland
http://library.wit.ie/
davidfk...@googlewave.com
T: ++353.51302838
M: ++353.876693212


Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread Ethan Gruber
David is right that Microsoft would never develop for multiple platforms
because that would undermine their business model, which is of course, to
duplicate efforts and reject international standards (or make Microsoft the
standard for everything).  Fortunately, Microsoft is losing its grip on that
strategy.

Back to the topic of Zentity, perhaps it would run in Mono, but then you are
caught in a situation where you are reliant on Novell also.  However, I
think tools should be chosen largely to fit the skillsets of staff.  If an
institution has a staffing of .NET developers, it makes sense.  I can't
think of a single person with ASP, .NET experience here, so Zentity *should*
never be considered an option at my institution.

Ethan

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Kane dk...@wit.ie wrote:

 So what?

 On 28 April 2010 15:37, Cowles, Esme escow...@ucsd.edu wrote:

  On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:25 AM, David Kane wrote:
 
   Why would they write software
   for a non-microsoft platform?
 
  I'll just point out that other OS vendors (Apple, Sun, Ubuntu, etc.)
 write
  software for other platforms.
 
  -Esme
  --
  Esme Cowles escow...@ucsd.edu
 
  Men feared witches and burnt women.
   -- Louis Brandeis, Whitney v.  California, concurring
 



 --
 David Kane
 Systems Librarian
 Waterford Institute of Technology
 Ireland
 http://library.wit.ie/
 davidfk...@googlewave.com
 T: ++353.51302838
 M: ++353.876693212



Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread Ross Singer
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Houghton,Andrew hough...@oclc.org wrote:
 If its open source, I assume that it could be adapted to run under Mono and 
 then you could run it on Linux, Macs, etc.  It may even run under Mono, don't 
 know, haven't played with it.


Well, it requires SQLServer, so I think this is probably going to be
much more difficult than it's worth.

-Ross.


Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread Houghton,Andrew
Well... it kind of requires SQL Server.  The project page says that it uses 
the Entity Framework and Link, and that means you can use MySQL or Oracle since 
there is an ADO.NET adapter for them.  Microsoft has a plugable data layer that 
anyone can write an adapter for.

Andy.

 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
 Ross Singer
 Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:23 AM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity
 
 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Houghton,Andrew hough...@oclc.org
 wrote:
  If its open source, I assume that it could be adapted to run under
 Mono and then you could run it on Linux, Macs, etc.  It may even run
 under Mono, don't know, haven't played with it.
 
 
 Well, it requires SQLServer, so I think this is probably going to be
 much more difficult than it's worth.
 
 -Ross.


Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread Ross Singer
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ethan Gruber ewg4x...@gmail.com wrote:
 It seems to me that the major flaw of the software is that it isn't
 cross-platform, which comes as no surprise.  But I feel Microsoft didn't do
 their market research.  While the financial and business sectors are heavily
 reliant on Microsoft servers, American universities, and by extension,
 research libraries, are not.  If they really wanted to make a commitment to
 support the academic community as they say on the Zentity website, they
 would have developed it for a platform that the academic community actually
 uses.

This seems like sort of a snotty answer, honestly, and I find three
flaws with it:

1) Research and intellectual output is not exclusive to large,
research university which means repositories should not be exclusive
to ARL libraries
2) There are lots of academic Microsoft shops, esp. at the campus IT
(or departmental IT) level.  It's not beyond reason to think that a
smaller university would prefer the repository be hosted by central IT
(or that the chemistry department or engineering school in a larger
university host their own repository).
3) E-Prints, for example, seems to be making an effort to commodotize
and democratize the repository space a bit by making it as simple as
possible to run an IR.  MS is making this even simpler for places that
already have Windows servers (which is a lot).

There are plenty of reasons to criticize Microsoft, but I just don't
see how Zentity is one of them.

-Ross.


Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread Edward M. Corrado

Ross Singer wrote:

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ethan Gruber ewg4x...@gmail.com wrote:
  

It seems to me that the major flaw of the software is that it isn't
cross-platform, which comes as no surprise.  But I feel Microsoft didn't do
their market research.  While the financial and business sectors are heavily
reliant on Microsoft servers, American universities, and by extension,
research libraries, are not.


Is this really true? My current University (including the Library) use a 
number of Windows Servers. Would I prefer a different platform for our 
Windows servers? Yes. However some are running applications that don't 
run on other platforms and the others were implemented before I got here 
and they are working so there is no reason to change them at this time. 
While I know many libraries/universities use Novel, Solaris, Linux, etc. 
I have serious doubts that a majority of American Universities don't use 
Microsoft servers to some degree. As an example, I often see people on 
the Voyager ILS listserv wanting to run there ILS on Windows because 
that is what is supported by campus IT.




  If they really wanted to make a commitment to
support the academic community as they say on the Zentity website, they
would have developed it for a platform that the academic community actually
uses.



This seems like sort of a snotty answer, honestly, and I find three
flaws with it:

1) Research and intellectual output is not exclusive to large,
research university which means repositories should not be exclusive
to ARL libraries
2) There are lots of academic Microsoft shops, esp. at the campus IT
(or departmental IT) level.  It's not beyond reason to think that a
smaller university would prefer the repository be hosted by central IT
(or that the chemistry department or engineering school in a larger
university host their own repository).
3) E-Prints, for example, seems to be making an effort to commodotize
and democratize the repository space a bit by making it as simple as
possible to run an IR.  MS is making this even simpler for places that
already have Windows servers (which is a lot).
  
Should we criticize Koha because (I believe) it doesn't have an 
up-to-date Windows version? How about Evergreen? No one is forcing you 
to use Zentity if you don't want to use Windows. If it doesn't fit in 
your environment, don't use it, but that isn't a reason to criticize it. 
I bet that more places can handle a Windows server rather then those 
that can handle a Linux server. If only because a competent Linux Admin 
can almost always manage a Windows server (maybe not MS applications 
like Exchange, etc.) with little or no training, but this does not 
necessarily work the other way around. Sure, the Linux Admin might moan 
and groan about this (I know from experience), but they can do it.



There are plenty of reasons to criticize Microsoft, but I just don't
see how Zentity is one of them.

  

Agreed.

Edward



-Ross.
  


Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread Johnston, Leslie
Microsoft certainly has developed for other platforms in the past, but they've 
greatly reduced that activity.

Keep in mind that one of the key aspects of Zentity is its integration with 
Microsoft desktop products.  If the goal is to get faculty to deposit their own 
content -- simplifying their workflows by allowing them to deposit files from 
the applications they use to produce some of their content -- then Microsoft 
has done its market research.  Watching their live demo in May 2009 at Open 
Repositories was eye-opening in that regard.  Their add-ons for Office support 
linking of Creative Commons licenses, ontology management, deposit to Zentity 
(and any other repo that supports SWORD) should be of interest to many.  
Sometimes I think we all forget that the first goal is to get faculty content 
INTO IRs.   We're going to be managing empty IRs if there aren't easy deposit 
tools.

As to American universities not running Microsoft servers, I have personally 
worked at major research universities (and research libraries) that do run them 
alongside their unix environment, usually because there is some aspect of the 
business operations that requires it.  And many smaller colleges and cultural 
heritage organizations absolutely do run Microsoft.  And every time I'm on a 
search panel for a programmer I see lots of applicants with .NET and ASP skills.

Leslie

-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Ethan 
Gruber
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:03 AM
To: Johnston, Leslie; Code for Libraries
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

David is right that Microsoft would never develop for multiple platforms 
because that would undermine their business model, which is of course, to 
duplicate efforts and reject international standards (or make Microsoft the 
standard for everything).  Fortunately, Microsoft is losing its grip on that 
strategy.

Back to the topic of Zentity, perhaps it would run in Mono, but then you are 
caught in a situation where you are reliant on Novell also.  However, I think 
tools should be chosen largely to fit the skillsets of staff.  If an 
institution has a staffing of .NET developers, it makes sense.  I can't think 
of a single person with ASP, .NET experience here, so Zentity *should* never be 
considered an option at my institution.

Ethan

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Kane dk...@wit.ie wrote:

 So what?

 On 28 April 2010 15:37, Cowles, Esme escow...@ucsd.edu wrote:

  On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:25 AM, David Kane wrote:
 
   Why would they write software
   for a non-microsoft platform?
 
  I'll just point out that other OS vendors (Apple, Sun, Ubuntu, etc.)
 write
  software for other platforms.
 
  -Esme
  --
  Esme Cowles escow...@ucsd.edu
 
  Men feared witches and burnt women.
   -- Louis Brandeis, Whitney v.  California, concurring
 



 --
 David Kane
 Systems Librarian
 Waterford Institute of Technology
 Ireland
 http://library.wit.ie/
 davidfk...@googlewave.com
 T: ++353.51302838
 M: ++353.876693212



Re: [CODE4LIB] Microsoft Zentity

2010-04-28 Thread Erik Hetzner
At Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:11:39 +0100,
David Kane wrote:
 
 Andy,
 
 It is a highly extensible platform, based on .NET and windows.  It is also
 open source!
 […]

Here is the license:

  
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/downloads/48e60ac1-a95a-4163-a23d-28a914007743/Research-Output%20Repository%20Platform%20EULA%20%282008-06-06%29.txt

This is not an open source license.

best,
Erik Hetzner

;; Erik Hetzner, California Digital Library
;; gnupg key id: 1024D/01DB07E3


pgpVPPJvvYS4q.pgp
Description: PGP signature