Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-08-04 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

And as Troy Poppe mentions, if 35881 is being considered for 1.0 then
perhaps 34056 should be as well.

For what it is worth, I'd -1 the patch by Troy until he fixed up the

[...]
try {
if (StringUtils.isNotEmpty(charset))
{
//BROKEN!
//getPrimaryBodyPart().setText(msg, charset);
getPrimaryBodyPart().setText(msg);
}
else
{
getPrimaryBodyPart().setText(msg);
}
[...]

conditional in MultiPartEmail that his patch introduces. Either get
rid of the conditional or fix up setText(msg, charset). But that hurts
my eyes.

Regards
Henning

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen  INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/

RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

  4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-08-02 Thread Eric Pugh
First off, I'll start with a mea culpa.  As one of the people who  
picked up commons-email and moved it from commons-sandbox into  
commons proper, and a committer on the Turbine project where commons- 
email came from, I should have done a better job.  My only excuse/ 
reason was some personal issues came up during my attempt to release  
1.0 that pretty much shut down all my activity on OSS stuff.


However, at this point, I have cleared the decks, and am ready to  
get back into being active on the Jakarta Commons community.   I'll  
take a look at the updated list of changes, including the ones that  
Siegfried sent me directly in an attempt to get some movement done!


IIRC, my big difficulty a couple months ago when trying to do the  
release was I just switched to OSX, and didn't get the whole key  
signing thing...   I am at OSCON this week, if any other Commons  
committers are there I bet we could do a bit of pair programming and  
knock out updated RC and 1.0 this week...


Being as the code has sat for a while since the last 1.0 vote thread  
passed months ago, I would do another RC first.


Eric


On Jul 28, 2005, at 11:01 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:


On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:34 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:


On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 22:25 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:

it's rare that any initial release candidate survives scrutiny  
from the
commons release maestros so i'm sure that an RC6 will have to be  
rolled

anyway.

i'm just rolling the cuts for dion so i'd appreciate some  
guidance on

this from those who know the code better. opinions?





From looking at the patch


  http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35881
this is a fairly significant change to the email API.

I think this is definitely something that should be done by the main
product maintainer, not someone just volunteering to roll RCs.



+1



I would suggest that either 1.0 go out without this change, or 1.0 be
delayed until the real email maintainer(s) have properly investigated
this, considered any backwards compatibility issues, etc.



i'm willing to let this one ride for a little while, i think. the
release candidate's only just out so there's no real reason why a
decision needs to be taken just yet.



And as Troy Poppe mentions, if 35881 is being considered for 1.0 then
perhaps 34056 should be as well.



+1

- robert


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-08-02 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:14 -0700, Eric Pugh wrote:
 First off, I'll start with a mea culpa.  As one of the people who  
 picked up commons-email and moved it from commons-sandbox into  
 commons proper, and a committer on the Turbine project where commons- 
 email came from, I should have done a better job.  My only excuse/ 
 reason was some personal issues came up during my attempt to release  
 1.0 that pretty much shut down all my activity on OSS stuff.
 
 However, at this point, I have cleared the decks, and am ready to  
 get back into being active on the Jakarta Commons community.   I'll  
 take a look at the updated list of changes, including the ones that  
 Siegfried sent me directly in an attempt to get some movement done!

cool

 IIRC, my big difficulty a couple months ago when trying to do the  
 release was I just switched to OSX, and didn't get the whole key  
 signing thing...   

i've been working on key signing documents for the foundation site and
i've used macOSX since the public beta. so, if you don't grok keys yet,
i'd be glad to help.

 I am at OSCON this week, if any other Commons  
 committers are there I bet we could do a bit of pair programming and  
 knock out updated RC and 1.0 this week...

i'm in sunny yorkshire (so that rules me out) but +1 to the concept

 Being as the code has sat for a while since the last 1.0 vote thread  
 passed months ago, I would do another RC first.

the good news is that we already have a recent RC:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-email/

i rolled the release as a stand in for dion (who has been going through
some difficult times lately...)

AIUI the major question remaining is which of the proposed significant
additions to the API should be added before the 1.0. IIRC they are
listed in bugzilla and dion is in favour of one of them. (please check
the recent emails for details).

- robert


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-28 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:34 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
 On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 22:25 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
  it's rare that any initial release candidate survives scrutiny from the
  commons release maestros so i'm sure that an RC6 will have to be rolled
  anyway.
  
  i'm just rolling the cuts for dion so i'd appreciate some guidance on
  this from those who know the code better. opinions?
 
 From looking at the patch
   http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35881
 this is a fairly significant change to the email API.
 
 I think this is definitely something that should be done by the main
 product maintainer, not someone just volunteering to roll RCs.

+1

 I would suggest that either 1.0 go out without this change, or 1.0 be
 delayed until the real email maintainer(s) have properly investigated
 this, considered any backwards compatibility issues, etc.

i'm willing to let this one ride for a little while, i think. the
release candidate's only just out so there's no real reason why a
decision needs to be taken just yet.

 And as Troy Poppe mentions, if 35881 is being considered for 1.0 then
 perhaps 34056 should be as well.

+1

- robert


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-27 Thread Dion Gillard
Hi, I filed an enhancement in Bugzilla today from Sigfried Goeschl
that would be great to get in before the 1.0 release.

It's a very minor API enhancement to make commons email more usable in
environments like fulcrum.

What do you think?

On 7/24/05, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 7/24/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  hi dion
 
  On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:13 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
   Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC and
   make it available, however I have very limited time at that moment, as
   I'm spending a large amount of time with my father who is in critical
   care in hospital.
 
  i'm really sorry to hear that. please don't feel under any pressure to
  make time for ASF work at a time like this.
 
 ;-)
 
 I'm keeping really busy making sure my mum is ok at the moment.
 
  if you think that the code's fine, then i can easily cut the RC and so
  on if that'd make things easier for you. let me know.
 
 That would be fantastic.
 
  take care
 
 Thanks.
 
  - robert
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 --
 http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
 You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your
 reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George
 Bernard Shaw
 


-- 
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your
reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George
Bernard Shaw

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-27 Thread Poppe, Troy

Is this enhancement any less involved than the request in bug #34056?  

I think 34056 is similar in that it involves some method signature changes, and
minor implementation changes (that only call new simple methods).  The end 
result
being that one can actually extend MultiPartEmail to provide for an S/MIME
implementation...

I'd like to request that if you're going to consider putting 35881 in to 1.0,
that maybe you could re-consider 34056 for 1.0?

Thanks.

Troy

-Original Message-
From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 7:07 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Users List
Subject: Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?


Hi, I filed an enhancement in Bugzilla today from Sigfried Goeschl that would be
great to get in before the 1.0 release.

It's a very minor API enhancement to make commons email more usable in
environments like fulcrum.

What do you think?

On 7/24/05, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 7/24/05, robert burrell donkin 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  hi dion
 
  On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:13 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
   Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC 
   and make it available, however I have very limited time at that 
   moment, as I'm spending a large amount of time with my father who 
   is in critical care in hospital.
 
  i'm really sorry to hear that. please don't feel under any pressure 
  to make time for ASF work at a time like this.
 
 ;-)
 
 I'm keeping really busy making sure my mum is ok at the moment.
 
  if you think that the code's fine, then i can easily cut the RC and 
  so on if that'd make things easier for you. let me know.
 
 That would be fantastic.
 
  take care
 
 Thanks.
 
  - robert
 
 
  
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 --
 http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
 You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your 
 reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George 
 Bernard Shaw
 


-- 
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will
be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George Bernard Shaw

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-27 Thread Simon Kitching
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 22:25 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
 it's rare that any initial release candidate survives scrutiny from the
 commons release maestros so i'm sure that an RC6 will have to be rolled
 anyway.
 
 i'm just rolling the cuts for dion so i'd appreciate some guidance on
 this from those who know the code better. opinions?

From looking at the patch
  http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35881
this is a fairly significant change to the email API.

I think this is definitely something that should be done by the main
product maintainer, not someone just volunteering to roll RCs.

I would suggest that either 1.0 go out without this change, or 1.0 be
delayed until the real email maintainer(s) have properly investigated
this, considered any backwards compatibility issues, etc.

And as Troy Poppe mentions, if 35881 is being considered for 1.0 then
perhaps 34056 should be as well.

Regards,

Simon



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 08:04 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
 On 7/24/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  hi dion
  
  On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:13 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
   Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC and
   make it available, however I have very limited time at that moment, as
   I'm spending a large amount of time with my father who is in critical
   care in hospital.
  
  i'm really sorry to hear that. please don't feel under any pressure to
  make time for ASF work at a time like this.
 
 ;-)
 
 I'm keeping really busy making sure my mum is ok at the moment.
 
  if you think that the code's fine, then i can easily cut the RC and so
  on if that'd make things easier for you. let me know.
 
 That would be fantastic.

i'll take a look at this today

- robert


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
hi dion

On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:13 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
 Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC and
 make it available, however I have very limited time at that moment, as
 I'm spending a large amount of time with my father who is in critical
 care in hospital.

i'm really sorry to hear that. please don't feel under any pressure to
make time for ASF work at a time like this.

if you think that the code's fine, then i can easily cut the RC and so
on if that'd make things easier for you. let me know.

take care

- robert


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-23 Thread Dion Gillard
On 7/24/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi dion
 
 On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:13 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
  Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC and
  make it available, however I have very limited time at that moment, as
  I'm spending a large amount of time with my father who is in critical
  care in hospital.
 
 i'm really sorry to hear that. please don't feel under any pressure to
 make time for ASF work at a time like this.

;-)

I'm keeping really busy making sure my mum is ok at the moment.

 if you think that the code's fine, then i can easily cut the RC and so
 on if that'd make things easier for you. let me know.

That would be fantastic.

 take care

Thanks.
 
 - robert
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your
reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George
Bernard Shaw

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-22 Thread Emmanouil Batsis


Any plans on this? I'm sure many would like to have a normal release 
in their project due to policies etc.


Thanks,

Manos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-22 Thread Dion Gillard
Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC and
make it available, however I have very limited time at that moment, as
I'm spending a large amount of time with my father who is in critical
care in hospital.

Once I have the dist process automated with md5 and gpg signing, and a
spare hour or two, I'll cut the next RC and start the voting process.

Sorry for the delays.

On 7/22/05, Emmanouil Batsis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Any plans on this? I'm sure many would like to have a normal release
 in their project due to policies etc.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Manos
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your
reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George
Bernard Shaw

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-04 Thread Dion Gillard
Is everyone ok with me doing a distribution for 1.0-RC5 and placing it
up for public consumption on people.apache.org/~dion ?
I'm currently going through
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html and making
sure it's all ready.

On 7/4/05, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Dion,
 
 How are things going with the 1.0 release of email?
 
 I see dumbster-1.6 is now on ibiblio/maven, and is compiled with java
 1.3. And as far as I can see you've already addressed all of the issues
 raised during the review of RC4.
 
 Is there any other issue holding up RC5 that I could help with?
 
 Regards,
 
 Simon
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your
reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live. - George
Bernard Shaw

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?

2005-07-04 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 11:11 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
 Is everyone ok with me doing a distribution for 1.0-RC5 and placing it
 up for public consumption on people.apache.org/~dion ?
 I'm currently going through
 http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html and making
 sure it's all ready.

This thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-devm=111955501823405w=
seems clear there is agreement for a release and no objections to you as
release manager. Go for it!

Cheers,

Simon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]