Resignation of the Apache Software Foundation from the JCP

2010-12-09 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
All,

I just sent the following email to the PMO and the EC's of the JCP.

Please look for a post on the foundation blog with details and explanation.

geir

On Dec 9, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> Dear Patrick,
> 
> On behalf of the Apache Software Foundation, I hereby resign our seat on the 
> SE/EE Executive Committee, effective immediately.
> 
> We'll have a post up on the Apache website with a detailed explanation for 
> the community - please contact me if you have any questions.
> 
> On a personal note, I have enjoyed working with all of you for the last 7 
> years, and look back fondly on the work we did together.
> 
> I wish you the very best in sorting out this mess - Java is too important to 
> all of us to let the current situation continue.
> 
> geir
> 
> Geir Magnusson Jr
> VP, JCP
> The Apache Software Foundation


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org



Re: Consulting rates

2010-11-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Oh, I see - I was just doing the direct conversion.  NM.

geir

On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:

> Sure. And Aaron said to double it. So after you divide by 2, you double it. :)
> 
> 
> On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> 
>> That's wrong.
>> 
>> You need to divide by 2.  $75k -> 35/hour
>> 
>> geir
>> 
>> On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> 
>>> Thank you. This is very helpful. I didn't know that there was a clear rule 
>>> of thumb like this.
>>> 
>>> On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>>> 
>>>> And since most people work 40 hours a week (approximately 2000 hours a
>>>> year), another more generalized way to state the rule of thumb is take
>>>> your preferred annual salary and divide by 1000.
>>>> 
>>>> Ie, $75,000 becomes $75 an hour.  In the US, keep in mind that taxes
>>>> on income after business expenses will be no less than 15.3% (self
>>>> employment tax) and most likely 30% or higher (se tax plus income and
>>>> other taxes), so a lot of this money disappears quickly :)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, J Aaron Farr  wrote:
>>>>> Rough rule of thumb is to take your salary (or preferred salary),
>>>>> convert it to an hourly rate, then double it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> J. Aaron Farr
>>>>> 馮傑仁
>>>>> www.cubiclemuses.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Rich Bowen
>>> rbo...@rcbowen.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
>> 
> 
> --
> Rich Bowen
> rbo...@rcbowen.com
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org



Re: Consulting rates

2010-11-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
That's wrong.

You need to divide by 2.  $75k -> 35/hour

geir

On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:

> Thank you. This is very helpful. I didn't know that there was a clear rule of 
> thumb like this.
> 
> On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> 
>> And since most people work 40 hours a week (approximately 2000 hours a
>> year), another more generalized way to state the rule of thumb is take
>> your preferred annual salary and divide by 1000.
>> 
>> Ie, $75,000 becomes $75 an hour.  In the US, keep in mind that taxes
>> on income after business expenses will be no less than 15.3% (self
>> employment tax) and most likely 30% or higher (se tax plus income and
>> other taxes), so a lot of this money disappears quickly :)
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, J Aaron Farr  wrote:
>>> Rough rule of thumb is to take your salary (or preferred salary),
>>> convert it to an hourly rate, then double it.
>>> 
>>> --
>>>   J. Aaron Farr
>>>   馮傑仁
>>>   www.cubiclemuses.com
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
>> 
> 
> --
> Rich Bowen
> rbo...@rcbowen.com
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org



gym rats / weight lifters

2009-10-31 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

Anyone? :)

geir


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org



Re: [apachecon] NoSQL meetup in Oakland

2009-10-28 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

I volunteer to chair if you need it.

geir

On Oct 28, 2009, at 6:20 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:


Hi,

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Jukka Zitting > wrote:


http://www.nosqloakland.org/

If you're interested in attending and perhaps presenting something at
the meetup, please sign up!


Given the large number of registrations so far I've decided to split
the meetup into two parallel tracks.

Would someone be interested in chairing the other track? I can't be in
two places at the same time. :-)

You'd need to start the other track with a few words of introduction
and welcome, introduce and help the speakers, and make sure that they
stick to the schedule.

PS. I've had people ask for the ability to tune in remotely to the
meetup. I can try setting up a Skype video call for that, but I'd love
to hear if someone has better ideas on how to achieve this. I'm quite
envious of all the good things I hear about the video recordings at
NoSQL Berlin... :-)

BR,

Jukka Zitting

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org



Re: [apachecon] NoSQL meetup in Oakland

2009-10-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
I'll be there - I can talk about Voldemort (using it in prod at Gilt,  
and giving a talk on it at NoSQL East the prior week...)


geir

On Oct 13, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:


Do we have any more time/date thoughts on this? I know Mr. Dynomite
and would love to invite him over.

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Eric Evans   
wrote:

On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:48 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote
I was thinking of potential cross-project meetup plans for the  
Content
Technology track at the ApacheCon US 2009, and one idea I came up  
with

is to organize a generic NoSQL gathering of non-relational database
projects. We already have CouchDB, Jackrabbit, Hadoop and Lucene  
(and
Cassandra?) people around, and it would be cool to invite also  
people

and projects outside the ASF.

WDYT?


This sounds great. I'm not sure if anyone else from the Cassandra  
camp

is planning to attend, but I'll be there.

--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org



Re: [apachecon] NoSQL meetup in Oakland

2009-07-13 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

that's a great idea

On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:48 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:


Hi,

I was thinking of potential cross-project meetup plans for the Content
Technology track at the ApacheCon US 2009, and one idea I came up with
is to organize a generic NoSQL gathering of non-relational database
projects. We already have CouchDB, Jackrabbit, Hadoop and Lucene (and
Cassandra?) people around, and it would be cool to invite also people
and projects outside the ASF.

WDYT?

BR,

Jukka Zitting

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-h...@apache.org



Re: JavaOne Meetup ?

2006-05-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr



Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

Martin-

when is that Geronimo Live thing?

I'll arrive on Sun. 14 at 06:40 PM
Leaving on 23th (09:xx PM)

Any news regarding an Apache Booth ?


No.  They didn't like the idea of one for free, and my tongue-in-cheek 
suggestion that we could now get the Azul booth since Sun and Azul were 
in all-out legal warfare didn't go over well either...


This is something we should push to change next year - Sun making J1 
floor accessible to non-profits...


geir



-Matthias

On 5/12/06, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will try to attend the Geronimo Live party, to possibly, get drunk. 
If you want to see me drunk,

you should go :)
(it's a one in a lifetime event :)

Mvgr,
Martin

Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 01:09:12PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>>Yes,
>>there are two
>>-Performance (state saving server / client )
>>-ADF Faces / MyFAces
>>
>>and one from Kito regarding "evolution of web" or something like that
>
>
> Looks like I'll be attending JavaOne, rather unexpectedly. It would be
> neat to meet up with ASF folk.
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



JaveOne : CHANGE OF MEETING POINT FOR BADGES

2005-06-27 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

Please note - the exhibit hall is in Moscone South, not north.

Please meet in front of Moscone South rather than top of escalators  
in North.


geir

--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



JavaOne Booth : please check booth times

2005-06-26 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
And please verify via a "*" that your project will be in the timeslot  
currently assigned.  Feel free to swap with non-* projects if you want.


http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/ApacheAtJavaOne2005


--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



JavaOne Booth : info (w/ URL!)

2005-06-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

[Sorry about the repeat - the URL is critical...]

http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/ApacheAtJavaOne2005

We have most things sorted out for the JavaOne booth.  I took the  
liberty of filling in the matrix of projects - I just went down the  
list putting one in a slot.  No prefs was given, and randomly doubled  
up.


We can choose to re-order.  Please put a * next to the name of the  
project if you confirm that timeslot after you choose when you want  
to be there.


IMPORTANT - we'll be working out the protocol for badge handoff and  
it will be on the wiki.  Please pay attention to it.


I've crossposted to get max awareness - any project that would like  
to participate is welcome.


Please reply to community only. I've set the reply-to, but double  
check, please.


geir

--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



JavaOne Booth Followup

2005-06-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
We have most things sorted out for the JavaOne booth.  I took the  
liberty of filling in the matrix of projects - I just went down the  
list putting one in a slot.  No prefs was given, and randomly doubled  
up.


We can choose to re-order.  Please put a * next to the name of the  
project if you confirm that timeslot after you choose when you want  
to be there.


IMPORTANT - we'll be working out the protocol for badge handoff and  
it will be on the wiki.  Please pay attention to it.


I've crossposted to get max awareness - any project that would like  
to participate is welcome.


Please reply to community only. I've set the reply-to, but double  
check, please.


geir

--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Apache booth at JavaOne

2005-06-10 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

All,

Apache will have a booth this year at JavaOne (donated by Gluecode,  
now part of IBM...)


We are looking to have as many projects represented, on a schedule,  
in a sort of "meet the geek" thing.  We don't know how many projects  
are signing up, so take a look at the wiki (below) and if your  
project isn't there, and you are willing to volunteer, please add  
your project and sign up.  The more the merrier.


http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/ApacheAtJavaOne2005

thanks

geir

--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is ASL2.0 not "GPL-compatible" ??

2004-12-21 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Scott Sanders wrote:
On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:17 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote:

Will the ASF shield me?
I doubt it.  I really doubt it.
Stephen.
Why do you say things like this?  Do you fail to understand this is 
the primary reason for the establishment of the ASF.
s/Do//
--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
On Dec 21, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Authority without accountability?
I'm could imagine why you and other members of the board feel
comfortable with this.  Make a chair accountable to the committee and
the next thing you know will be board accountability to chairs.  Oh god
- would that send a rocket up the darker passages of the ASF!
I realize that this is little more than a filibuster, and I probably 
should be smacked for feeding *this* troll, but I'm a board member, I 
voted for pushing Avalon over the side, and wonder why you believe that 
we could invert the oversight structure?  Would the membership then be 
accountable to the board?

We are structured to provide demonstrable oversight of the organization 
on behalf of the membership.  We are accountable to the membership.  We 
are elected by the membership, and can be thrown out, singly or en 
masse, by the membership.

To that end, the board is charged with establishing PMCs, which are 
managed by an officer of the corporation, the PMC Chair.  This person 
has the right to make decisions on behalf of the corporation (being an 
officer) that he or she considers to be in the best interest of the 
corporation.

Where's the problem?
geir
(For the record, I support the actions of the board in this matter, and 
specifically, Greg's explanation of how things work...)

--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:23 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 05:02, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
If there's a reasonable reason, cool.  Otherwise, maybe we can move
on.  There'll be no 'winner' here.
But we could proclaim Stephen and Niclas "winner". Maybe this thread
would end then and then we all would "win"...
Henning - thanks - this is much better than ruining another Roxy Music 
song for me...

:D
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-17 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Dec 17, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:

Comments in [] by me, with apologies to Bryan Ferry and Roxy Music.
You just ruined this for me - I really liked that song, and I really 
hate this whole Avalon thing.

Now, can we please lay this thread to rest? What good is it for? Just 
to
prove "I was right"?
+1
Regards
Henning
(This was meant to be a funny/ironic comment. Come on, these lyrics are
more than twenty years old... )
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen  INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for 
hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
 fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
 position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
 is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
 deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
   --Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
Open Source Software Development"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Update to mailing lists page

2004-12-02 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
this is cool!  Any chance we can get labeled x and y axis?
On Dec 2, 2004, at 7:52 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I've revamped the Apache mailing lists data page a little bit.
(http://www.apache.org/~coar/mlists.html)  For one thing, the
moderator-supplied description for each list has moved to *below*
the list statistics.  For another, I've added an activity graph
for each list.
The graph shows subscription and post activity for up to the last
90 samples.  Since the sample interval is 1 day, that generally means
three months.  If samples aren't collected for a week, though, it
means the graph will cover 97 days, with the uncollected week's
data silently missing from the graph.
The graph is for showing trends *only*.  Both the post-count and
the subscriber-count lines are scaled properly, but each uses
its *own* scale to fit nicely into the chart.  So you can safely
say, 'Cool!  More and more people are subscribing!' but not
necessarily, 'Cool!  Four people subscribed last Tuesday!'
I've attached a sample graph from the derby-dev list.
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist  http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQa8PkJrNPMCpn3XdAQHOKAP/dxNVOLGkSec/NuccHXGAX4fr1kM4ers9
chBqMYgecqN8jvSPTnOD70PiLEcqZ+rwS6dooM6ZasmZ7AnCe09aPsbTObCREslM
hwcmrZHOkTZiY0B4OXQTA5PrB6/tOonxSnxLLUAY0A4quGDgNyJ+anL9I0MmmYby
ZcrBTkR8c3E=
=na1P
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
- 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Geir Magnusson Jr  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


OBJECTWEBCON05 : Call for Proposals

2004-09-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
This is the call for proposals by the ObjectWeb consortium for their  
annual conference.  The deadline for proposals has been extended, so I  
encourage anyone that could possibly make the conference to submit.   
Brian Behlendorf will be the keynote speaker :)

ObjectWeb as a community makes a great effort to collaborate with us  
and other open source groups to make good software widely available.   
I'd like to see us give them as much support as we can.

   --
    
  ObjectWeb Annual Conference, 4TH EDITION
   Lyon, France
   January 17-19, 2005
   http://www.objectweb.org/ObjectWebCon05
 *
  SUBMISSION DEADLINE: September 15th, 2004
  *
 ObjectWebCon05, the next ObjectWeb annual conference will take place  
in Lyon, France on January 17-19, 2005.

 As the ObjectWeb consortium becomes an important player in open source  
infrastructure software for the industry, its annual conference grows  
and strengthens as unique opportunity for professionals to discover,  
learn and exchange on middleware and open source software. As an  
experienced professional of the domain, you are invited to submit  
proposals for sessions of the conference.

 Submissions should be made online before September 15th 2004 at  
http://wiki.objectweb.org/ObjectWebCon05/CallForProposals.jsp

 More information on the CFP may be found below.
 We are looking forward to reading your proposals,
 Best regards,
 The ObjectWebCon05 Program Committee
  


 Please freely distribute this call to interested colleagues and  
friends.
 If you have questions regarding the Call for Proposals, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 The ObjectWebCon05 program committee is seeking to receiving proposal  
for technical sessions (30 minutes).

 Topics of interest include but are not restricted to:
 
 * user experience, best practices, case studies related to ObjectWeb  
projects or other open-source infrastructure software
 * commercial offers, services and business models related to  
open-source middleware
 * open-source middleware projects, open-source communities / .orgs
 * technical presentation of middleware research topics / R&D projects
 * ObjectWeb project hot topics (restricted to ObjectWeb contributors)

 Guideline to submit:
 ---
 * The title of the presentation.
 * A brief outline or abstract of the presentation (not to exceed 400  
words).
 * For each speaker, the speaker name, title, company, professional  
street and email addresses, phone and fax numbers. Addresses, phone and  
fax numbers are for organization purposes only and will not be  
distributed to third parties without prior agreement.
 * A short biography of the proposed speaker(s) showing relevant  
experience and qualification to speak on the proposed subject matter  
(not to exceed 300 words).

 Submissions should be written in English, tutorials and presentations  
are to be given in English.

 Important dates: 
 ---
 * Abstract due: September 15th 2004
 * Notification: starting October 15th 2004


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: apache swag

2004-07-15 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Jul 14, 2004, at 11:04 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
the appropriate permissions having been obtained, my apache swag
store is now open:  http://www.cafeshops.com/meepzor/230676
a percentage of the profits are donated to the apache software
foundation.
this note is not a solicitation to buy stuff, but for sugegstions
for additional items.  i'm not a graphic designer, so the best i
can do is rather primitive.
Plug : I'm a satisfied customer :)  Buy this stuff!
and before you ask, black is not a t-shirt colour cafepress offers
yet. :-)
Nor should it be
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist  http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQPVLcprNPMCpn3XdAQHm1wP/egbnOEIt4+4FzBR8ytTJCtyh+TqMDEGx
c1OVxoTSaGP6hAhDmvK/xCOAA6rpDN8ge/eVdhmOekG4bld5LG21x07O22GZxuTO
E+kWQw9R2J2wCKAAFS6/UkDbWwgdfcnQaW00wX9o5dNX9IwofgaE2YoA+ACQihmj
SRF6fX7h4dM=
=FhyZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OASIS

2004-06-28 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Jun 27, 2004, at 5:20 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I'll give this conversation a week or so to build up; and if not - 
will
send a polite msg to Oasis saying; thanks for the offer but not at 
this
time.
I think you should also provide some list of 'benefits' for ASF to
Ok - personal benefits (without my ASF hat):
->   be able to give excelent feedback to the open
standards processes, making them better, making
the asf better and strengthening open standards and
opensource in general.
And this is important.  From my experience with the JCP, it's clear 
that "generally clueless" is the way to describe most people when it 
comes to open source.

->   prevent the creation of standards which while
open cannot be realistically implemented or
maintained in the open source world.
+1
--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Düsseldorf

2004-03-30 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
In dusseldorf. (Sent this to party@ but it never went through...)
Anyone live here and want to meet for a beer?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache should join the open source java discussion

2004-03-25 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Mar 25, 2004, at 6:18 AM, David N. Welton wrote:
Well, according to this, the 'discussion' is over:
http://news.osdir.com/article491.html
For this year, I think.

I think the best thing that ASF community members can do for now,
until the next news flareup, is in blogs, conversations etc, is
point out how much the ASF does wrt 'open source java' - how this
isn't a new idea and we're working hard to make it happen.
I'm not a user or participant in the Java community, so my perceptions
and impressions are those of an outsider.
What does the ASF do to promote "open source java", where "open source
java" is defined as the basic infrastructure necessary to run java
code on computers (jvm and libraries)?
Right now we are doing nothing specifically to that end.  That's 
starting at the bottom of the stack, and we work from the other 
direction.

Costin had some good suggestions for working deeper - like ensuring 
code here works on the OSS implementations (which is really just a form 
of compatibility testing...)

The only thing we could do for OSS is to actually do an implementation 
of a JVM for some platform and get it certified, which is possible.

I vote we choose the .NET CLR as the first platform ;)
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache should join the open source java discussion

2004-03-19 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Mar 18, 2004, at 7:10 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Serge Knystautas wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Key ASF individuals are joining these discussions, on weblogs and 
various discussion forums. But the ASF as a whole is silent.

In lieu of forming a statement for the ASF as a whole, what about 
organizing/encouraging/guiding people who want to participate?  
Maybe specific resources that should be targetted, such as where the 
most active and/or productive discussions are taking place.

What about starting by making sure Apache java projects _do_ work 
with the 2 open source JVMs that are mentioned in the
article ?  That would be a statement, much better than "we like open 
source java, but our software doesn't run on it because it doesn't
really matter".
Nobody has been stopping you from proposing an incubation project 
about this.
Why would it be an incubation?
--
Stefano.

--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache should join the open source java discussion

2004-03-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Mar 18, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Serge Knystautas wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Key ASF individuals are joining these discussions, on weblogs and 
various discussion forums. But the ASF as a whole is silent.

In lieu of forming a statement for the ASF as a whole, what about 
organizing/encouraging/guiding people who want to participate?  Maybe 
specific resources that should be targetted, such as where the most 
active and/or productive discussions are taking place.

What about starting by making sure Apache java projects _do_ work with 
the 2 open source JVMs that are mentioned in the
article ?  That would be a statement, much better than "we like open 
source java, but our software doesn't run on it because it doesn't
really matter".
Perfect - this is the way that the ASF has always supported open-source 
java - by actually doing it...

geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache should join the open source java discussion

2004-03-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr

I wasn't subscribed to community@ until now, so if there's something 
there that wasn't xposted to general@, let me know...


More inline :
On Mar 18, 2004, at 11:21 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
the intention is to get involved  really wanted to keep quiet
about it, but your post brought this front and center.
little did I know! See what happens when stuff happens on private 
mailing lists? Duplication of effort :-P
LOL
it wasn't on a private list.  There was some informal discussion, and I 
kept meaning to bring it up to the community in general...

I'll happily shut up, since you're obviously on top of things. And 
thanks for letting us know you're on top of things :D
I won't claim to be on top of anything yet, but certainly will keep 
trying...

geir
--
cheers,
- Leo Simons
---
Weblog  -- http://leosimons.com/
IoC Component Glue  -- http://jicarilla.org/
Articles & Opinions -- http://articles.leosimons.com/
---
"We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but
 people wouldn't obey the rules."
-- Alan Bennett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache should join the open source java discussion

2004-03-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Mar 18, 2004, at 8:16 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Something big is stirring in the java world. There's talks between Sun 
and IBM about releasing an open source version of java. There's talks 
between the linux desktop movers about adopting java as the glue that 
binds the major desktop projects together.

Key ASF individuals are joining these discussions, on weblogs and 
various discussion forums. But the ASF as a whole is silent.

Apache is one of the biggest open source communities, and the leader 
of the pack when it comes to open source java.

I think the Apache community should work together on an open letter to 
Sun, IBM, and the rest of the open source community stating our shared 
position on the subject. Like Havoc Pennington writes 
(http://ometer.com/desktop-language.html), the "Community Should 
Decide" and "It's time to start the discussion".

WDYT?
The ASF has always been a proponent for 'open source java', and while 
I'm glad to see the rest of the world catching up, I believe the path 
we are on is fundamentally a good one, and we shouldn't deviate too far 
from it.

Here's something I wrote a little while ago for the members list, 
describing what we do and will do :

1) Keep working to make TCKs available to ASF projects that implement 
JSRs, and when needed, infrastructure to run the TCKs.  We cover the 
spectrum - from smaller WS stuff (including something for J2ME, IIRC), 
to the big mosnster, J2EE.  The main activity is getting TCKs in the 
hands of non-members to use in ASF projects, something thats just 
requiring some legal paperwork.  Given that we'll have a larger and 
larger group using TCKs, willing to fix them if given the chance, I see 
oppo for OSS-ing TCKs.  Maybe I'm a dreamer.  (Note that new the 
proposed JSR 241 for Groovy is going to be an OSS TCK and OSS RI).

2) Bring RIs here to the ASF.  We have a good tradition of this 
already, Tomcat and JSP for example, and we need to continue it, either 
by taking on ownership of existing RIs, such as we are working on for 
JavaMail, or hosting RIs for EGs on which the ASF has a rep (or not).  
This will tend to force the "open spec" issue, as you can't get the 
"free" help of an OSS community if they can't read the spec and know 
the motivations behind APIs.

3) Do what we can to connect the various JSR-implementors in the OSS 
community.  For example, we'd like to connect all J2EE implementors, 
both OSS and non-OSS (so JBoss would be invited), to talk 
confidentially with each other about issues they face to pass the TCK.  
This would expose the OSS communities w/ the commercial community in a 
deep, technical way, which I think will help the commercial crowd form 
an accurate picture of OSS.

We are the only open source entity on the Executive Committee of the 
Java Community Process.  The efforts of the ASF (w/ Jason as rep) 
resulted in pro-OSS changes in a de-facto international standards 
group.  These changes included free JCP participation for individuals, 
academics and non-profits, the ability to actually create a TCK and RI 
under an OSS license, and the creation of the scholarship program for 
individuals, academics and non-profits to get TCKs and RIs free of 
charge w/ free support to certify open source projects.  One very 
visible result of this is that the ASF and ObjectWeb are both J2EE 
licensees, and working to create certified open-source J2EE stacks.

Since this recent brouhaha started, the intention is to get involved 
(me wearing the VP JCP and VP Jakarta hats makes me itch to do 
something :)  At first I wanted to make a public statement too, but 
after thinking about it for a while, and since we had a nice quote from 
Brian in the first news cycle, I put that aside for a little while.  
This is a somewhat tricky issue due to the compatibility concerns and 
politics involved, and it's clear that we can be most effective if

a) we are sure to continue to be a neutral party in what is currently 
visible as a Sun vs IBM public pissing match - IOW, we don't pile on 
Sun (nor ignore IBM)

b) we completely understand the issues facing all sides (well, both 
sides, Sun and IBM, as I don't really care what ESR's issues are...)

To that end, I've been working privately (w/ JCP hat on) with a few 
people, and wish to continue that way for a little while.  I don't want 
this to appear as anything more than me just talking to people - not an 
official ASF action by any means - and I really wanted to keep quiet 
about it, but your post brought this front and center.

I think the best thing that ASF community members can do for now, until 
the next news flareup, is in blogs, conversations etc, is point out how 
much the ASF does wrt 'open source java' - how this isn't a new idea 
and we're working hard to make it happen.  And we're doing it not in 
the pres

Re: webbit 2004

2004-01-16 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Kill the webbit, kill the webbit!
On Jan 16, 2004, at 5:50 AM, David N. Welton wrote:
Hi,
This is mainly for the Apache folks who reside in Italy.
I would like to know if anyone else is going to be at the webbit this
year.  It's a fun couple of days, and I can guarantee that if we had
an Apache presence there, it would be quite popular.  We need to start
organizing it now though, if we want to participate.
http://www.webbitcon.org/
Ciao,
--
David N. Welton
   Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
 Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/
   Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/

--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Sun and the JCP 2.5

2003-04-02 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 05:38 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Yes, Apache is on the "scholarship" board.
If you want to discuss this further, you might consider joining the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.

The problem is that I might inadvertantly receive information covered 
by apache's non-disclosure agreements with Sun.  This could limit my 
economic viability in the future should I wish to implement a 
technology which competes with Sun.  Would it be possible to have a 
list set up for those who are either not members or whom do not wish 
to be bound by such agreements to discuss the Apache side of the JCP?

I've suggested this time and again, making a jcp-discussion list where 
no NDA-covered information would be submitted, but there never is any 
interest.

If you are interested now - Sam, could you do the honors?
geir

-Andy
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-956-2604(w)
Adeptra, Inc.   203-434-2093(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   203-247-1713(m)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]