Can we please disable the Wiki on Nagoya?
Hi, a quick look at http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?RecentChanges should tell you why. During the past weeks there have been at most four or five real content edits per week. At the same time our Wiki has attracted an asian spammer that seems to be switching IP addresses so that blocking probably won't work (at least I failed to see a system). There still seem to be a few projects that use this Wiki instance instead of wiki.apache.org, namely Axis, XML general, Pluto and maybe FOP. I hope that some people of those projects are subscribed here. Please ask for your own Wiki instance (with access control and commit mails) and let's turn off that unmaintained thing. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can we please disable the Wiki on Nagoya?
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We've discussed this on infrastructure before. I thought so. But since there are still projects using the old instance I wanted to raise it here as well. Someone (probably Leo) will need to be ready to do a final conversion of the data, and then we can redirect the wiki from nagoya to wiki.apache.org/old. Great, hope he'll find the time soon. Cheers Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Follow the example
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and just because ant doesn't have any sessions, doe that mean the asf-wide conference shouldn't be mentioned on their page? I know you've just been picking that as an example, but I want to ensure that there is no wrong impression here. Ant does mention the conference on its site. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EU Software Patents
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If anyone's counting a show of hands here I'm a European and +1 to opposing software patents in Europe and +1 to the ASF supporting the demo. Same here. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPSAL] Support EU Patent Vote Protest
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This may well be too late for any form of decision, but I propose that for the duration of the 27th August 2003 we change the index page of the main ASF web site to point at a page that states our opposition to the proposal being voted on and our support for the campaign against it. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: primary distribution location
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a way around all this if you write an interface that is used to be generic, and have the interface implementation stored elsewhere. But the interface implementation would have to be LGPLed again, so you don't really win anything. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: primary distribution location
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You do win.. You don't have to have the direct implementation in apache cvs and ask if the eg gpl'ed software would include an implementation of that in their distro's. OK, the interface is there, Ant's Task class. I'm just a bit kidding here. Point is that people want to see an SSH task in Ant but all suitable libraries seem to be LGPLed (or worse). We have already suggested that these libraries ship with tasks of their own. Adding some SSH library abstraction to Ant wouldn't make live easier for the libary developers IMHO. So in this particular situation, you don't gain anything. In a broader context, the strategy you describe may help, I agree. So the project concerning can just add Apache Ant can make direct use of our library without having to redistribute their code under the terms of section 6 Sure. Or they could simply switch to a better license directly 8-) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Openness
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read this mail list thru a web archive? [X] +1 yes, let's make it readable [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [ ] -1 no, let's keep it private VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully subscribe to this mail list? [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone [ ] 0 don't know/don't care [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only Stefan
