Re: [Computer-go] CGOS future

2015-04-09 Thread Hiroshi Yamashita

Hi,

e.g. Aya783a_50 (is it 50 playouts?! seems to slow for that or running 


Yes it is 50 playouts, and It waits 4sec per move. Also gnugo anchor uses
4 sec wait. Without wait,  gnugo spends a lot of cpu time when there are
only short thinking programs. I also run pachi, mogo and fuego 10k.
I wish the system, if there is new program,  some programs run automatically 
and stop.

Regards,
Hiroshi Yamashita

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS future

2015-04-09 Thread Urban Hafner
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Detlef Schmicker d...@physik.de wrote:

 Hi, I just started playing on 13x13 again, very busy :)


It is you that's running all the strong bots? If so, thank you! My second
copy of GnuGo had reached an ELO rating of almost 1900 these last days, but
now it's back down to almost 1800 (where it should be).


 One feature request:
 give the programmer the chance, to add some information to the bot (in the
 configuration file?!):


Yes, a description field would definitely be nice.

Urban
-- 
Blog: http://bettong.net/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ujh
Homepage: http://www.urbanhafner.com/
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] CGOS future

2015-04-09 Thread Detlef Schmicker

Hi, I just started playing on 13x13 again, very busy :)

One feature request:
give the programmer the chance, to add some information to the bot (in 
the configuration file?!):


e.g. Aya783a_50 (is it 50 playouts?! seems to slow for that or running 
on an old mobile :)


Detlef

Am 06.04.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Joshua Shriver:

This sounds like a good idea and I haven't ruled out Java, but not the
biggest fan. But would rather do it in Java than say C.

I was leaning toward C# since it's a very popular and portable
language. The code would be portable among Win/Lin/OS X heck even
Android/iOS (for viewer)  due to Xamarin.

I'm working on the first baby-steps of just getting a very basic
server/client model up and running and as you said relying more on GTP
and the engines to do more self-checking and use cgos only as a
gateway (till next update).

Going to use mysql/mariasql instead of lightsql. Then I can use php
for the backend webwork.

I'm going to re-use some of the webcode I wrote years ago for OICS as
well so that will kickstart that portion a bit.

Will update more as things progress.
-Josh

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Detlef Schmicker d...@physik.de wrote:

What about just start the project on github or https://bitbucket.org/ (is
not bad at forking and merging)

Open an issue for the discussion and off we go:)

When I was thinking of a quick solution I was thinking about gogui, which
supports most of the game handling already.

http://gogui.sourceforge.net/doc/reference-twogtp.html

GoGui is well tested and widely used, as far as I know. The twogtp tool is
used e.g. in CLOP and works really great. A observer program may be added to
judge the resulting position, e.g.
gnugo...

The first server / client would not have to do much more than authorization
and afterwords tunneling gtp to get it playing and logging the games and
results?!

The result logs would be used to compute the ratings (possibly by a
independend process)?!

I have no special wishes about programming language, but as kgsclient
requires java anyway, java dependency is no additional dependency for new go
programmer...

I do not love java, but if one thinks of integrating the server into gogui
it might be a good idea to use?!

I would just start and try connecting Markus Enzenberger (author of GoGui
later, if he is interested in merging?!)

I would definitely work on the project, but it should have a quick start and
room for improvement later:)

Detlef



Am 03.04.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Joshua Shriver:

Agree as well.  But would like to offer both options.   Planning to
use github and make it 100% open source.

-Josh

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Christoph Birk
b...@obs.carnegiescience.edu wrote:

On Apr 3, 2015, at 5:40 AM, folkert folk...@vanheusden.com wrote:

My goal is to move away from interpreted languages and release SOLID
.exe or bin for unices.

Are you talking about servers or clients there?

For clients, PLEASE do not release binaries, release sources. No sane
linux user installs random binaries.

I 100% agree,
Christoph

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go


___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go



___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go