Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, At the begin, Continuum was designed to support maven2 projects so we thought it was good to put it under the maven umbrella. But now it supports other project types (ANT, shell scripts) too so it isn't centered on maven projects. An other thing is that we have lot of users (not only maven users) with actually 450 subscribers to the users list, and I think we can get more with a TLP project. My last point is that with the maven project, it isn't easy to add new committers because a new committer have the hand on all maven umbrella code and not only one project. So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance to grow. My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from different companies would be good. WDYT? I think Continuum fits both under the Maven umbrella and and a separate TLP on Apache and I would support both outcomes. -- Trygve
build definitions in UI
Hi, Sorry, didn't take a look at these before the beta-3 release. What do folks think of the following changes? - replace select all/unselect all by a checkbox above the checkbox column that functions in this way (seems a more standard convention) instead of the links - put delete project(s) last in the line - change all the group buttons to be consistent: edit group, delete group, release group, build group - add release project(s) to the bottom - put build project(s), build group and add project on lines of their own Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
Re: build definitions in UI
+1, except for the last one, but only +0 for that. Christian. On 23-Sep-07, at 3:56 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Sorry, didn't take a look at these before the beta-3 release. What do folks think of the following changes? - replace select all/unselect all by a checkbox above the checkbox column that functions in this way (seems a more standard convention) instead of the links - put delete project(s) last in the line - change all the group buttons to be consistent: edit group, delete group, release group, build group - add release project(s) to the bottom - put build project(s), build group and add project on lines of their own Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
build in error fix not working?
Hi, Note this build: http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/ buildResults.action?projectId=272projectGroupId=8 It is stuck in error - but I thought this was fixed in beta-3? Could it be because it is an error on SCM update that it isn't detected as fixed? - Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
Re: build definition used on build result
Hi, * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a clone and add of the buildDefinition). * Yes it is in the email. * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm update/checkout failed -- Olivier 2007/9/23, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A couple of questions/issues on this new feature: * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build definition is later removed?) * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet) * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http:// maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action? buildId=23999projectId=272projectGroupId=8 Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ -- Olivier
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance to grow. My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from different companies would be good. It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least to start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's talk about it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see who else might be interested in joining us in a TLP. IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is welcome to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future. That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked well. -- Wendy
Re: adding video capture to the continuum site
Hi, I have made two samples : - starting continuum and add a project http://people.apache.org/~olamy/continuum/flash/start-continuum.htm - using the build definition template new feature http://people.apache.org/~olamy/continuum/flash/build-definition-template.htm It's two flash files. Too see the size : http://people.apache.org/~olamy/continuum/flash Note : we can reduce the size (I have used my default screen resolution 1280x800). -- Olivier 2007/9/21, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wendy Smoak a écrit : On 9/18/07, olivier lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to add some wink captures to the site (as adding a project for newbies etc...) Great idea. :) yes. with or without voice? As this files can be huge, I don't really want to add this in sources trunk (It can be long to checkout the sources) But in order to publish them, they must be in a site module. Not necessarily... they can be hosted anywhere that can handle the bandwidth, and linked to. Is YouTube an appropriate option? (Or can you convert to a format that can be hosted there or somewhere similar?) yes, it's an appropriate option. I don't think YouTube remove files after few days/months That's why I'd like to remove the site module from this current path and move it to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/continuum/. svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-site/ https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/continuum . I'm not in favor of moving the site somewhere it doesn't get checked out with the project. But I also don't think the ASF Subversion repo is the right place for documentation video files. (It would be different if they were *part* of the product itself.) If we put video files in svn, it will be only wink files but I'm not sure if it's the right place. I'm not sure we have a quota in svn but wink files will use lot of places. How many files do you want to do? How many minutes? Are any other projects offering video examples? How do they handle it? I don't know one at ASF. Emmanuel -- Olivier
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
+1 on this.. I think Continuum is ready to become a TLP at ASF. -Deng Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, At the begin, Continuum was designed to support maven2 projects so we thought it was good to put it under the maven umbrella. But now it supports other project types (ANT, shell scripts) too so it isn't centered on maven projects. An other thing is that we have lot of users (not only maven users) with actually 450 subscribers to the users list, and I think we can get more with a TLP project. My last point is that with the maven project, it isn't easy to add new committers because a new committer have the hand on all maven umbrella code and not only one project. So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance to grow. My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from different companies would be good. WDYT? Emmanuel
