Re: [Cooker] urpmi update - good news!

2003-09-19 Thread Steve Fox
I did this last night on my wife's computer and it mostly worked. The
glitches that I had were related to urpmi not removing previous versions
of packages. So I would have something like:

libfoo1-1.2-2mdk
libfoo1-1.2-4mdk

both installed after the upgrade. Some packages would not upgrade
because they depended upon the older libfoo1. So once I removed all the
duplicates, then the upgrade worked great. Not sure what triggers the
duplicates though.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Galeon 1.3.8, trouble rendering characters?

2003-09-12 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 08:22, Adam Williamson wrote:

 Yeah, hang on, here's a couple...
 
 http://mikesbballrants.blogspot.com/
 
 Look at the end of the first entry (the paragraph starting The first
 person these criteria I see non-rendered characters after these
 bits of text:
 
 2.53 ERA while pitching 24
 count 'em 24!
 voted for Norris in a heartbeat
 To be continued

Looks fine to me.

 http://forums.sudhian.com/messageview.cfm?catid=43threadid=42566
 
 Look at the post from ciqala, I see a non-rendered character before
 this text:
 
 700 for the case plus shipping
 
 which I think is meant to be a pound sign.

This is fine too.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Epiphany is now the default GNOME web browser

2003-09-09 Thread Steve Fox
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 02:39, John Keller wrote:

 Epiphany was chosen sometime before 2 July:
 http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2003-July/msg00016.html
 
 Epiphany might be gnome default in Mdk 10, but not before:
 http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5018

I guess I didn't make myself clear. I know GNOME has selected Epiphany
to be the default, but Frederic stated that Galeon will remain the
default for Mandrake.

My comment was that in a recent Cooker update, my default was forced to
be Epiphany. Frederic needs to possibly hack whatever package controls
that, so that MDK 9.2 will default to Galeon.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



[Cooker] Epiphany is now the default GNOME web browser

2003-09-08 Thread Steve Fox
Something in the last few days convinced GNOME that Epiphany is the
default web browser. I think Frederic was planning to change that before
release, so I thought I'd mention it. I had Galeon specified in the
Preferred Applications applet before, so something forced the update. It
had a weird line in the middle of a radio button rather than a full
circle. I'm not sure if that is supposed to indicate the lack of a
choice (using system defaults).

On the other hand, Evolution now launches the web browser properly.
Yeah!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gdm-2.4.2.102-3mdk

2003-08-29 Thread Steve Fox
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 03:23, Frederic Crozat wrote:

 Yes, I switched from xemacs to gvim and asked titi to add it to package.. 
 But I haven't yet configured my email address in vim so I have to
 type it for each changelog entry :(

Congrats on choosing the only REAL text editor!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] [HELP WANTED] model name of your /proc/cpuinfo

2003-08-19 Thread Steve Fox
model name  : Pentium III (Coppermine)

IBM ThinkPad T20

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] resend: Nautilus text previews in icons

2003-08-19 Thread Steve Fox
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 12:51, John Keller wrote:
 I never seem to be able to get text previews in my icons in Nautilus (local
 files or remote mounts), not even when I set preferences to show them
 Always. Sometimes, I wonder if it isn't because Nautilus thinks my machine
 is too slow (PII/400). But then again, I *can* see graphic previews just
 fine.

This is theme dependent. The 'Gnome' icon theme shows text previews, but
'Industrial' does not.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] pygtk* needs rebuilding

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 11:48, Götz Waschk wrote:
 Am Freitag,  8. August 2003, 11:07:32 Uhr MET, schrieb Steve Fox:
  None of the pygtk* packages are working due to the new 2.3 Python.
  Please rebuild. Thanks.
 Really, pygtk2.0 was already rebuilt, I'm working on pygnome. I
 thought pygtk2.0 should be OK, what are your problems? 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] meld-0.8.4]$ ./meld
No module named pygtk
Meld requires a recent version of pygtk to run.
pygtk-1.99.15 or higher is recommended.

Installed packages:

pygtk2.0-libglade-1.99.17-1mdk
pygtk2.0-wrapper-1.99.17-1mdk
pygtk2.0-1.99.17-1mdk
gnome-python-1.99.16-8mdk
gnome-python-bonobo-1.99.16-8mdk
gnome-python-gconf-1.99.16-8mdk
python-numeric-22.0-3mdk

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnome-applets-2.3.6-2mdk

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Fox
installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/gnome-applets-2.3.6-2mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...   
##
  39:gnome-applets 
##
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type para
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type para
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type
itemizedlist
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type
itemizedlist
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type para
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type para
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title
yelp:get-title could not determine the title of node with type title

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



[Cooker] pygtk* needs rebuilding

2003-08-08 Thread Steve Fox
None of the pygtk* packages are working due to the new 2.3 Python.
Please rebuild. Thanks.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] pygtk* needs rebuilding

2003-08-08 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:11, Steve Fox wrote:
 Installed packages:
 
 pygtk2.0-libglade-1.99.17-1mdk
 pygtk2.0-wrapper-1.99.17-1mdk
 pygtk2.0-1.99.17-1mdk
 gnome-python-1.99.16-8mdk
 gnome-python-bonobo-1.99.16-8mdk
 gnome-python-gconf-1.99.16-8mdk
 python-numeric-22.0-3mdk

It looks like the hdlist file was not updated yet. The mirrors had -2
but it told me I was up to date. So I installed -2 and GTK works now.

It appears that gnome-python-1.99.16-8mdk is still in need of a rebuild
though.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] meld-0.8.4]$ ./meld
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ./meld, line 57, in ?
import meldapp
  File /home/drfickle/src/meld-0.8.4/meldapp.py, line 24, in ?
import gnome
ImportError: No module named gnome

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] pygtk* needs rebuilding

2003-08-08 Thread Steve Fox
I now have the latest gnome-python and pygtk2.0 packages (thanks guys!),
but it looks like meld is still dying. Can anyone else get it to work?
meld.sf.net

[EMAIL PROTECTED] meld-0.8.4]$ ./meld
Fatal Python error: can't initialise module gnome.ui
Aborted (core dumped)


-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnome-control-center-2.3.4-2mdk

2003-07-30 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 03:05, Frederic Crozat wrote:

 The second one is an error from me : in the loop, replace * by *.schemas,
 I forgot I put non schemas stuff in there ..

Tried this again and gnome-theme-manager still refuses to start.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnome-control-center-2.3.4-2mdk

2003-07-29 Thread Steve Fox
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 07:14, Frederic Crozat wrote:

 for i in /etc/gconf/schemas/* ; do 
  GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2
 --makefile-install-rule $i  /dev/null
 done

I had this problem as well. It still doesn't start after running this.
I'm up to date with cooker.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] drfickle]# for i in /etc/gconf/schemas/* ; do  
GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2
--makefile-install-rule $i  /dev/null; done
WARNING: no list_type specified for schema of type list
WARNING: failed to install schema
`/schemas/desktop/standard/recent-document-entry' locale `C': Schema
specifies type list but doesn't specify the type of the list elements
WARNING: no car_type specified for schema of type pair
WARNING: no cdr_type specified for schema of type pair
WARNING: failed to install schema
`/schemas/desktop/standard/save-location-entry' locale `C': Schema
specifies type pair but doesn't specify the type of the car/cdr elements
Document `/etc/gconf/schemas/panel-default-setup.entries' has the wrong
type of root node (gconfentryfile, should be gconfschemafile)

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] perl-Gtk2-0.0.cvs.2003.07.04.1-2mdk

2003-07-06 Thread Steve Fox
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 14:38, Thierry Vignaud wrote:

 for now, i'm packaging the new branch.
 
 if the switch prove to be easy, we *MAY* switch from the old inline
 gtk2-perl to new xs one.

I would like to thank you very much for experimenting with this. Some
co-workers and I have written a gtk-perl app and have been waiting for
the gtk2-perl bindings to pick a direction for some time now. It will
make it much easier for Mandrake users at my place of work to use my app
if there is a single gtk2-perl binding.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] pcre doesn't have UTF-8 support?

2003-07-04 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 03:30, Götz Waschk wrote:

 This shouldn't be a problem, just add  --enable-utf8 to the configure
 call. I hope it doesn't break grep, but I doubt that it will cause any
 harm. The readme says it also has to be enabled at runtime.

That's what I did, but it'd sure be nice if cooker enabled it by
default.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



[Cooker] pcre doesn't have UTF-8 support?

2003-07-03 Thread Steve Fox
I'm trying to build regexxer http://regexxer.sourceforge.net/ and it's
spewing errors. Anyone know if pcre can be rebuild with UTF-8 support
for cooker please?

checking for pcre-config... /usr/bin/pcre-config
checking for libpcre = 3.4... yes
checking PCRE_CFLAGS...
checking PCRE_LIBS... -L/usr/lib -lpcre
checking whether libpcre was compiled with UTF-8 support... no
configure: error:
*** Sorry, the PCRE library installed on your system doesn't support
*** UTF-8 encoding.  Please install a libpcre package which includes
*** support for UTF-8.  Note that if you compile libpcre from source
*** you have to pass the --enable-utf8 flag to its ./configure script.

Using these packages:
libpcre0-4.3-2mdk
libpcre0-devel-4.3-2mdk
pcre-4.3-2mdk

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-4.3-15mdk

2003-06-13 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:24, Han Boetes wrote:
 Feature request: when you install a package you often need other
 packages to be installed as well. Could you make a list of those
 dependant extra installed packages? So if peope uninstall the first
 package you can also deinstall the packages it depended on. Of course
 only if no other packages depend on them.

urpme already does this

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Re: WARNING : GNOME 2 broken

2003-06-11 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 18:09, J.A. Magallon wrote:

 Failed to load image /usr/share/pixmaps/gnome-help.png
 Details: file not found
 
 (the icon for yelp in the top bar)
 
 panel or yelp problem ?

I've got a number of missing icons too. I've noticed that gnome-panel is
a few releases out of date.

Frederic, a new gnome-panel coming soon?

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] urpmi features

2003-03-18 Thread Steve Fox
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:53, James Sparenberg wrote:

 In a sense doesn't it do this already.. if you open the software sources
 menu the uncheck a source and click save and quit.  it will put an
 ignore tag on this item in /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg.  This source is still
 configured and can be re-activated any time you'd like but for the
 moment urpmi -a and urpmi xx will not access this media.  I
 use it all the time for boxes so I don't have to carry disks with me
 everywhere I go.

Yes, but it's kind of a pain in the butt. A command line switch would be
appreciated.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



[Cooker] postgresql-python not as clever as the others?

2003-03-05 Thread Steve Fox
This one postgresql-* package doesn't seem as clever as the others. They
others didn't try to connect to the server (which wasn't running)

  20:postgresql-python  ###
[ 60%]
psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
Is the server running locally and accepting
connections on Unix domain socket /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432?

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



[Cooker] pygtk vs pygtk2.0

2003-02-26 Thread Steve Fox
I thought you could have both pygtk and pygtk2 installed? Don't they use
a separate name space?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi  pygtk2.0
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
dia-0.90-5mdk (due to missing pygtk)
draksync-9.0-1mdk (due to missing pygtk)
pygnome-1.4.4-1mdk (due to unsatisfied pygtk == 0.6.9)
pygtk-0.6.9-6mdk (due to conflicts with pygtk[ 0.6.11])

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] ACPI Commands

2003-02-26 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 07:36, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:

 try pmsuspend command it should humm kind of working.

I tried it on my IBM Thinkpad T20 last night. It appeared to save ok (I
had to add resume=/dev/hda5 to my lilo.conf), but it never recovered
after it came back up. Of course, even sleep has been working like shit
lately too :(

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Bug 1583 not taken into account ?

2003-02-25 Thread Steve Fox
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 07:47, Greg Meyer wrote:

 Well whatever the solution is, GNOME won't start without error until I hard 
 code localhost.localdomain  into /etc/hosts.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] st-perl]$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 tp localhost

Works fine here

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org



Re: [Cooker] Bitstream Vera Fonts Now Available: Is there Anywayto Add them To 9.1?

2003-02-20 Thread Steve Fox
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 23:17, Adam Williamson wrote:

 Yes, and frankly, they suck.

They might not be the best, but they certainly don't suck. And they're
certainly better than any other fonts the Linux distributions currently
ship.

With 9.1 already at the rc1 stage, I highly doubt that the fonts will be
released in redistributable form in time for 9.1 final.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Non-deleting mirror?

2003-02-19 Thread Steve Fox
Does anyone know of any non-deleting Cooker mirrors? I think glic*-10mdk
broke my freeswan VPN connection and I'd like to verify if using -9mdk
fixes the issue.

Thanks.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Apache missing a depends somewhere?

2003-02-14 Thread Steve Fox
Doing 'urpmi --auto-select' this morning and got:

Installation failed:
apache-modules = 1.3.27-6mdk is needed by apache-1.3.27-6mdk
[root@tp root]# cd /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/
[root@tp rpms]# ls apache*
apache-1.3.27-6mdk.i586.rpm  apache2-common-2.0.44-4mdk.i586.rpm
[root@tp rpms]# rpm -q apache-modules
apache-modules-1.3.27-5mdk

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Apache missing a depends somewhere? - IGNORE

2003-02-14 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 09:14, Steve Fox wrote:
 Doing 'urpmi --auto-select' this morning and got:
 
 Installation failed:
 apache-modules = 1.3.27-6mdk is needed by apache-1.3.27-6mdk
 [root@tp root]# cd /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/
 [root@tp rpms]# ls apache*
 apache-1.3.27-6mdk.i586.rpm  apache2-common-2.0.44-4mdk.i586.rpm
 [root@tp rpms]# rpm -q apache-modules
 apache-modules-1.3.27-5mdk

Sorry, please ignore. apache-modules-*-6mdk wasn't on the mirror I was
using yet.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Thoughts on Galaxy

2003-02-13 Thread Steve Fox
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 10:47, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 Description : Mandrake Linux Galaxy theme

Hi Frederic, I hope you're not fearing this too much :)

It looks good over all, however it crashed gnome-theme-manager the first
time I switched to it. Upon subsequent theme switches it was fine
though.

What I like:

- Curved edges on toolbar buttons
- Attractive toolbar handles
- Scrollbars look clean
- Nice combo boxes
- The blue looks good with the light gray widget color
- It's simple

What might be considered:

- Buttons seem to be a bit puffy :)
- Window title seems to be a little too short. The min/max/close buttons
  seem to come right up to the edge. Perhaps the 3D effect on the
  buttons could be decreased rather than enlarging the window title
  height?
- The left window border is considerably darker than the other edges. It
  kind of clashes with the rest of the window colors.
- No icon theme?

Keep up the good work! 

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Thoughts on Galaxy

2003-02-13 Thread Steve Fox
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 14:37, Steve Fox wrote:

 What might be considered:

- The unselected highlight color is a little light. It's hard to read 
  white text on a light gray background.

Thanks 

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: UNIX Lore and the benefits of kmail

2003-02-12 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 09:01, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:

 Running Evolution 1.0.8 here, many mailing lists, all split into about
 200 subfolders. Even then some folders, like php-bugs, have over 30,000
 messages. I have *lots* of filters, and I get only 1 or 2 unfiltered
 SPAM per day.

1.2.x will greatly improve the speed of POP3 downloading, better IMAP
handling, and it even *greatly* reduced the amount of disk space (the
indexes weren't being cleaned up before). 

I highly recommend an upgrade :) 

The only thing that sux0rs is getting used to the new key bindings: . or
] for next unread, , or [ for previous unread, rather than n and p which
I am used to. Oh, an hide/show message pane moved from q to `. I guess
you get used to it after a week or two.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: UNIX Lore and the benefits of kmail

2003-02-12 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 12:21, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:

 If 1.2.x is stable, I can't wait to install it, just for the new mail
 notification. I want it to notify me when I have new mail, but only if
 it's filtered in my important-inbox folder.

I've had excellent luck with it. Just make sure you're running an all
Cooker system, which all good Mandrakesoft'ers do, right? :)

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-09 Thread Steve Fox
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:

 Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie? 

Just a lurker on this thread (since it's really gone awry), but I would
say definitely not. You've been a very good diplomat for the Debian
project.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-09 Thread Steve Fox
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 22:47, Greg Meyer wrote:

 In my estimation, you have completely misrepresented the discussion that was 
 going on here by substituting your own wishful thinking and by using out of 
 context comments by people committed to making Mandrake successful.  That is 
 not being a good diplomat for the Debian Project.  You took this thread where 
 you wanted it to go, which was a far different place than when it started.

You guys seem to have it ass backward. He was simply making suggestions,
which were shot down. He wasn't trying to force anyone to do anything.

They proposed to create Mandrake Linux development as community similar
to how the Debian project is organised, which is why John Goerzen from
Debian contributes to the discussion. Austin Acton wonders how Debian
maintains responsibilities and resources.

Sounds pretty harmless to me. The only thing in doubt is the reference
to 'Mandrake developers', which makes it sound like Mandrakesoft
employees were in this discussion, which they were not.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gtkhtml-1.1.8-2mdk

2003-02-08 Thread Steve Fox
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 02:00, Frederic Crozat wrote:

 - Recompiled against gal 0.23 (grr, this one should be ABI compatible 
   with older version but it isn't)

Fix verified. Thanks Frederic!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] tetex packaging error?

2003-02-06 Thread Steve Fox
Doing 'urpmi --auto-select' today and got this:

12:tetex  #error: unpacking of archive failed on
file /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/config;3e42c012: cpio: open failed
- Not a directory

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org





Re: [Cooker] tetex packaging error?

2003-02-06 Thread Steve Fox
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 14:33, Charles A Edwards wrote:

 This only happens if you have the  -2mdk rpm installed, it won't
 upgrade. 
 Work-around: use rpm -e --nodeps tetex and then urpmi tetex

I've been syncing every day, so I'll assume I had the latest prior to
today's update.

Looks like doing what Charles suggested worked. 

Thanks!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Who killed the gnome?

2003-02-04 Thread Steve Fox
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 09:40, Austin Acton wrote:

 Is this a cooker thing or did I do something stupid?

Guessing it's a PEBCAK issue since it works fine here.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] xchat-1.98-1

2003-01-27 Thread Steve Fox
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 12:42, Yves Duret wrote:

 there are perl and *python* scripting but no tcl.

TCL support included in 2.0-pre1 :)

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xchat-1.9.8-1mdk

2003-01-24 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 04:15, Yves Duret wrote:
 --=-=-=
 Name: xchatRelocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 1.9.8 Vendor: MandrakeSoft

Rock on!

 +%configure2_5x  --enable-openssl --enable-ipv6 \
 + --enable-hebrew --enable-japanese-conv \
 + --enable-python

Perl support doesn't seem to be included? My self-compiled version
loaded my scripts just fine, but this one doesn't.

Thanks!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xchat-1.9.8-1mdk

2003-01-24 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:16, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:

 There's a seperate xchat-perl package.

Thanks for the tip!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xchat-1.8.11-1mdk

2003-01-23 Thread Steve Fox
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 09:02, Daouda LO wrote:
 --=-=-=
 Name: xchatRelocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 1.8.11Vendor: MandrakeSoft

Is there a reason for not moving up to 1.9.8 in Cooker? I have been
using it since it was released and have found it to be even more stable
than the 1.8.x series (especially under heavy disk activity).

Thanks.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Bitstream Fonts

2003-01-22 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 19:07, Brad Chamberlin wrote:

 hopefully it won't take too long to actually release them...I wonder if
 it's too much wishful thinking for addition to 9.1?

Luis Villa (the guy who posted the screen shot at
http://tieguy.org/fonts.png) said they should be released within a week.
Frederic is already preparing to add them to Cooker cuz he rocks.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Gnome menu editor?

2003-01-22 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 16:51, Jason Straight wrote:

 Is there a gnome menu editor? Did mdk remove it?

You can go to start-here: in nautilus and by clicking the Applications
icon you can begin editing your menu within Nautilus.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] GTK2 VIM packages available

2003-01-15 Thread Steve Fox
Daniel Elstner [EMAIL PROTECTED] has created a GTK2 patch for
VIM. It's totally uberswank and any self-respecting VIM user would see
it as a gotta-have patch :) He emailed it off to Bram tonight, so
hopefully it will be in an official patch soon.

Obligatory screenshots:

http://regexxer.sourceforge.net/pix/gvim_pango_screenshot2.png
http://regexxer.sourceforge.net/pix/gvim_pango_screenshot_japanese.png

I've took the Cooker VIM RPMs and applied all the official patches up to
patch level 289 (since that's the version the GTK2 patch is against).
I've got these packages available at http://drfickle.net/gtk2vim/ in
case anyone else wants to give them a whirl.

One note: Since GTK2 uses fontconfig and sane font names are available,
you should edit your /usr/share/vim/gvimrc and replace the 'guifont'
line with something like:

set guifont=Monospace\ 10

Enjoy!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] no new cooker-packages since last night ?

2003-01-09 Thread Steve Fox
I noticed the mirrors aren't syncing again too. :(

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] no new cooker-packages since last night ?

2003-01-09 Thread Steve Fox
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 10:41, Jason Komar wrote:

 I just put in a second hard drive and run my own mirror on it.

How does that help if the primary mirror (sunsite.uio.no) isn't syncing?
Do you know something that we don't? :)

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Please don't make urpmi stupid

2003-01-08 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 12:32, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
 In the real world, sysadmins just find a solution (like redoing the crap 
 ass RPM someone made) and move on with life. If you don't like 
 dependancy checking, then don't use urpmi. Use the plain rpm command. 
 Write your own scripts as a wrapper. Or just patch urpmi yourself for 
 your own needs. It's not rocket-science! ;)

Wow, what a well thought-out response! You're a freaking genius!

I NEED dependency checking. What I am asking for is the tool to only
worry about dependencies which are affected by the action being
requested.

There is no reason for urpmi to care about unrelated dependencies which
I made a conscious decision to break knowing very well the potential
results.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] [Bug 759] [urpmi] New: urpmi should not considerunrelated unresolved dependencies

2003-01-08 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:26, rcc wrote:
 regardless of the question - which seems valid to me - why don't you
 just repackage SuperFoo and remove its dependency on IBM-JDK?

I can definitely do this. What I am wanting to do is keep urpmi from
doing unnecessary things. If there is no good reason for urpmi to do
this new behavior then why add it? I'm hoping the urpmi developers can
explain the reasoning behind it, I haven't heard anything yet.

Just imagine other people who have lots of SuperFoo type applications.
It becomes annoying real quick. I just want to keep a good tool from
going bad.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] nautilus-rpm-0.1-1mdk

2003-01-08 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 18:12, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 URL : http://www.gnome.rgo/

Is .rgo a new TLD? :)

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] [Bug 759] [urpmi] New: urpmi should not considerunrelated unresolved dependencies

2003-01-08 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 16:47, Todd Lyons wrote:

 I can see the scenario that you want to deal with, but is it easier to
 just add one line to your skip.list or to rewrite key portions of the
 urpmi script(s) and lib to do it?  All or none are always easier than
 some, especially when the definition of some changes per sysadmin.
 Honestly I feel that is what skip.list is for.  

What I am asking for is to back out some changes to make the tool
simpler. I would guess that worrying about all the dependencies for the
entire system is more work than just the ones I am upgrading, but maybe
I'm wrong. 

Really I would just like an explanation of why the new behavior is
desired. I would ask the Debian folks, but I'm not in the mood for a
religious battle.

 As usual, fpons is the ultimate authority on it as it's his baby.

His response confused me. He claimed it should not be worrying about
unrelated unresolved dependencies (like apt does), but in my case it is.
And I am 100% sure that this is an unrelated case.

 You seem pretty aversed to editing skip.list.  What reasoning is behind
 your position?

The main reason is because I want urpmi to stay the best tool possible.
There are very few things more annoying that someone taking a good
perfectly working tool and enhancing it only to make it less
functional than before. I get this all the time at work and it's
extremely frustrating.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] apmd-3.1.0-1mdk

2003-01-08 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 17:34, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:

 sounds good fix, i was planning to fix a bunch of stuff there (nobody
 touched this thing since i left this year) but i can't find any apm
 laptop, anyway thanks and i will commit the patch.

I have installed apmd/apm-scripts and it seems to be working fine on my
Thinkpad T20. I didn't notice any changes in this version yet over the
last. It simply just suspends and wakes up for me like it's always done
(restarting my sound and network properly).

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Software naming (was: Please don't make urpmi stupid)

2003-01-08 Thread Steve Fox
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 01:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 the name urpmi does sound stupid, like somebody belching.  why do
 linux programmers give their software such silly names?  guess they
 dont have sales or packaging departments 

Because it's fewer keystrokes! :)

GNOME 2.0 went and renamed all their tools with more sane names, and so
did the new Red Hat 8 configuration tools.

gcalc = gnome-calculator
gfontsel = gnome-font-viewer

redhat-config-samba
redhat-config-httpd

So there is still hope!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Please don't make urpmi stupid

2003-01-07 Thread Steve Fox
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 04:18, François Pons wrote:

 Ok, I hope I will not hurt sensibility but urpmi doesn't care if
 unrelated dependencies are unresolved. *BUT* urpmi when resolving
 related dependencies (and related should be understanded in the very
 large part) it may add unresolved dependencies.

That's just the thing. It used to not care about unrelated dependencies.
But now it does and it says that it must uninstall SuperFoo in order to
continue. 

If I select Yes it allows my 'urpmi --auto-select' to continue and in
fact it *does not* actually uninstall SuperFoo. I started this thread 
because this indicates to me that in the future urpmi will uninstall it,
and that it doesn't currently uninstall it is merely a bug or an
uncompleted feature. 

urpmi seems to be becoming like apt. I tried out apt4rpm once for
giggles when I was running RH8 for a while. It wouldn't let me install
any software at all because I had this unresolved dependency that was
totally unrelated to anything I was installing (it was complaining about
the JDK even though nothing I installed used Java).

So apt4rpm was completely useless to me and was half the reason I
returned to Cooker.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Please don't make urpmi stupid

2003-01-07 Thread Steve Fox
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 01:35, Vox wrote:

   Then use the ugly little hack to go around their ugly little hack,
   and keep yelling at them...if it's closed source stuff, I bet you
   are paying them...so...yell at them a lot...if they don't want to
   fix it, yell at their boss or at their boss' boss...keep going up
   the lather, it'll happen, specially if it's an expensive product
   that is not widely deployed in the world.

Granted I can do that, but the point I'm trying to make is that this
unresolved dependency has nothing to do with any of the packages I am
updating. 

It just makes sense to me to only worry about things that affect the
action you are trying to perform. urpmi doing a 'system check' to make
sure the whole world is in order not only has this nasty side effect,
but it also probably slows urpmi down.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gstreamer-0.5.1-1mdk

2003-01-07 Thread Steve Fox
All three of these GStreamer updates called gst-register in the
%post_install script , which pegged my CPU until I did 'killall
gst-register' for each package.

Any one else affected by this?

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Please don't make urpmi stupid

2003-01-06 Thread Steve Fox
I noticed that urpmi now tries to figure out all the unresolved
dependencies on your system just like how apt does. I think this is
extremely annoying behavior and I wish I was disabled by default. 

Justification:

I have an application, SuperFoo, installed. It has a dependency on IBM's
Java Runtime Environment (JRE). I need to use Sun's JRE because IBM
hasn't bothered to release one that likes gcc 3.2 yet. And I know from
my usage that it works fine with Sun's JRE. SuperFoo is a proprietary
application so I don't have the source for it. Having to repackage it
every release to remove the stupid hard requirement on IBM-JDK is
extremely annoying.

So I can install SuperFoo with straight rpm -Uvh --nodeps. Life is good
and I can use SuperFoo.

Now being the good Cooker person that I am, I do 'urpmi --auto-select'
to sync with the latest packages.

The latest urpmi says Hey, we have unresolved dependencies! I MUST
uninstall SuperFoo!, even though SuperFoo has nothing to do with all
the other packages that I will be updating.

I hope you see where this is painful. Every time I want to update
Cooker, it will try to uninstall SuperFoo even though there is no reason
to.

Previously I have bragged to Debian users that urpmi is smarter because
it only concerns itself with the packages that are being
installed/upgraded.

Please tell me there is hope that urpmi can be made smart again?

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Please don't make urpmi stupid

2003-01-06 Thread Steve Fox
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 19:47, Vox wrote:

   Easy to fix:
 
   rpm -e --justdb SuperFoo 

While that is certainly a solution, it seems like an awful nasty hack.
(but thanks for the tip :)

I would much prefer to see the tool remain smart. Really, why should it
even care if unrelated dependencies are unresolved? It's kind of like
getting into other people's business even though they didn't ask you to.
(ok, maybe that's not the best analogy, but it's all I can think of)

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Please don't make urpmi stupid

2003-01-06 Thread Steve Fox
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 23:19, Vox wrote:

   I actually like to think that urpmi getting old unresolved deps
   flagged is A Good Thing(tm). If you don't care for deps, don't use a
   package *manager*.

I totally appreciate that for packages which are being
upgraded/installed. But for stuff that's not being modified, it
shouldn't worry about it.

The whole all dependencies must always be resolved is nice if you live
in your closed little world where smart packagers like Mandrake create
proper dependencies. 

But in the Real World (tm), there are idiots who package things to fit
in their little world. They won't listen to me when I say to use a
Requires: java instead of Requires: IBM-JDK.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Unsigned packages in contribs

2002-12-19 Thread Steve Fox
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 05:05, Sascha Noyes wrote:

 I do however also find the errors by rpmdrake 
 _very_ annoying. Could Mandrake perhaps include a seperate key for signing 
 contrib apps, and give a message (but only once) that the signing only proves 
 that the package was built by Mandrake, nothing else.

While I know the process is not completely automated, you are right that
they are not examining the entire source code. 

Your suggestion for a separate contribs key is a very good one though
and I would certainly like to see it done to avoid the urpmi warnings.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Unsigned packages in contribs

2002-12-18 Thread Steve Fox
Is there a reason that some contrib packages are left unsigned? If
Mandrake rebuilds uploaded SRPMs why aren't they then signed with the
Mandrake key?

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] perl-ldap missing dependency?

2002-12-09 Thread Steve Fox
I believe that perl-ldap is missing a dependency on perl-Convert-ASN1.

[drfickle@tp st-perl]$ perl -e 'use Net::LDAP;'
Can't locate Convert/ASN1.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl .) at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/Net/LDAP.pm line 11.

This is an issue for Cooker, 9.0, and 8.2 at least.

Thanks.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Very funny (demos/spotlight)

2002-10-11 Thread Steve Fox
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 20:27, Phil Lavigna wrote:
 
   I thought that might get a chuckle out of somebody. Thanks, you're the 
 first : )

Don't suppose I could get you to add rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep emacs` to
the post install script? :)

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] 9.0 and next

2002-09-26 Thread Steve Fox

On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 04:46, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 
 I'm not sure having assigned people per package is really a good idea =
 it will require a lot of people.. But your idea is somehow a variation on
 the same theme as my idea :)

Very true, but then again having just you to manage ALL of GNOME is
tremendous pressure on you. Would you benefit from having lieutenants to
assist you with packaging? I think having groups of reliable volunteers
to assist (and help keep Mandrake's costs low) would be very beneficial.
I am officially volunteering to help with GNOME packaging if you are
receptive to this idea.
 
-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] thoughts on mp3 issue

2002-08-28 Thread Steve Fox

On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:38, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
 
 Haavard wrote:
 I'm a bit surprised that this has come up now, mp3licensing.com has never
 listed any exemption for freeware decoders.

That is incorrect.

http://web.archive.org/web/20010331223305/www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/swdec.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2000/debian-legal-26/msg00091.html

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] thoughts on mp3 issue

2002-08-28 Thread Steve Fox

On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 09:57, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
 
 Hum, don't forget that Freeware != Freeofcharge != Freesoftware,
 I think that's the point. There was only exceptions for free of
 charge decoders.

True, therefore the downloadable CDs were ok, but not the PowerPacks.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Better remove MP3 support

2002-08-26 Thread Steve Fox

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70983

It appears that as of a couple months ago you now need a license to
decode MP3s too. Long live Ogg!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Galeon/Mozilla/Anti-aliased text

2002-08-20 Thread Steve Fox

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 04:26, Adam Williamson wrote:
 
 Oh, for crying out loud...why? Why does Moz have this masochistic desire
 to reinvent the wheel all the time for no good reason? What's wrong with
 Pango? Jeez...

Because Pango was only declared stable in March and it's portability
to multiple platforms has not been complete or tested properly.
Mozilla's been in development for 4 years now.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libzvt-2.0.1-5mdk

2002-08-20 Thread Steve Fox

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 04:30, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 
 - Update i18n patch to fix bugs 90816  90818 (scrolling and cursor problems)

So far things look great here. Thanks!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] xchat keeps dying after latest libzvt changes

2002-08-20 Thread Steve Fox

Seems totally random. I'm using transparent windows.

Gdk-ERROR **: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)
  serial 28727 error_code 9 request_code 73 minor_code 0

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] xchat keeps dying after latest libzvt changes

2002-08-20 Thread Steve Fox

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 22:15, Steve Fox wrote:
 Seems totally random. I'm using transparent windows.

Seems to have gone away once I turned of transparency. I haven't been
using transparency in my gnome-terminal lately and that has been stable
all day. 

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] xchat keeps dying after latest libzvt changes

2002-08-20 Thread Steve Fox

On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 00:20, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 
 I really doubt xchat is using libzvt-2.0 since we don't have yet the GTK2
 version of xchat..

Good point. Anything I can do to provide more details? It's been running
flawlessly since I turned off the transparent background. Before I
updated yesterday I never had any problems with it.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] gnome workspace switcher

2002-08-13 Thread Steve Fox

On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 01:42, Eugenio Diaz wrote:
 The naming of workspaces in the gnome workspace switcher are not 
 preserved. If I change the names, and logout, when I login again my 
 custom names are gone and it is reset to Workspace 1, Workspace 2, etc.

I have a bug open on this.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85061

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] S3 Savage driver

2002-08-12 Thread Steve Fox

(Sorry for emailing you directly, but I didn't see any response last
time I asked in July.)

Could the S3 Savage driver http://www.probo.com/timr/savage40.html
please be updated to the 1.1.23 level? This has some really nice bug
fixes in it such as allowing video playback to work with a 24-bit color
depth. 

Thanks.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] XFree86-4.2.0-19mdk

2002-08-12 Thread Steve Fox

On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 17:31, Frederic Lepied wrote:
 
 * Mon Aug 12 2002 Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4.2.0-19mdk
 
 - updated savage driver to 1.1.23t

Thank you Frederic!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Evolution won't start mail component

2002-08-09 Thread Steve Fox

After updating to today's Cooker, Evolution cannot start its mail 
component. After running killev, I run evolution from one terminal and 
it displays:

evolution-shell-WARNING **: Error changing interactive status of 
component OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Mail_ShellComponent to TRUE -- 
IDL:omg.org/CORBA/COMM_FAILURE:1.0

I start evolution-mail from another terminal, but it doesn't spew any 
error messages.

Any suggestions?

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org





[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnome-session-2.0.5-2mdk

2002-08-09 Thread Steve Fox

On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 04:45, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 
 - Patch1 (rawhide): set GTK_RC_FILES so we can change the gtk1 theme

Any idea why Evolution would honor this, but not X-Chat?

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Evolution won't start mail component

2002-08-09 Thread Steve Fox

On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 09:15, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 
 Try running oaf-slay..

I remembered that right after I sent the email. Gar! Sorry to bug you.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnome-session-2.0.5-2mdk

2002-08-09 Thread Steve Fox

On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 09:16, Steve Fox wrote:
 On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 04:45, Frederic Crozat wrote:
  
  - Patch1 (rawhide): set GTK_RC_FILES so we can change the gtk1 theme
 
 Any idea why Evolution would honor this, but not X-Chat?

Actually, after doing the oaf-slay Evolution doesn't honor it either.

I have tried switching GTK+ themes in the Theme capplet. Any hints on
how to activate this for GTK+-1.x apps? 

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gnome-session-2.0.5-2mdk

2002-08-09 Thread Steve Fox

On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 10:57, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 
 Be sure to also install latest gnome-control-center package..

Got that.

 And you'll have to logout..

That's what I was missing. I was so used to themes auto-applying that
this hack didn't occur to me.

Thanks Frederic.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] gdmlogin still confused

2002-08-02 Thread Steve Fox

gdm-2.4.0.5-2mdk

gdmlogin still thinks I have a mismatch between the daemon and itself.
The greeter reports itself as 2.4.0.5 and I have rebooted the machine,
so the daemon has definitely restarted.

Does GDM keep the daemon version in a file somewhere?

Anyone else experiencing this?

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] font in gnome-terminal broken

2002-08-02 Thread Steve Fox

On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 16:30, Frédéric Crozat wrote:
 
 Another workaround is to change the font size..

As the original poster mentioned, one cannot change the font or its
size. I'd be curious if this works for anyone.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mozilla-1.1-0.beta.1mdk

2002-07-31 Thread Steve Fox

On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 13:22, Brad Felmey wrote:
 
 The argument is still valid. If I choose US, I expect US everywhere, not
 just where it wasn't convenient to implement.

So write a patch to the installer to configure every application that
doesn't bother to read your locale.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mozilla-1.1-0.beta.1mdk

2002-07-31 Thread Steve Fox

On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 15:02, Brad Felmey wrote:
 
 It needs to be more abstract than that. It needs to do so any time the
 locale is changed, not just during install.

True. My point is that this is an application problem. Mandrake can't
afford to fix every i18n-broken application that they ship, especially
since it can be manually fixed.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mozilla-1.1-0.beta.1mdk

2002-07-31 Thread Steve Fox

I was hoping for a miracle that 1.1 would fix the radio button problem.
But, alas, 'tis not meant to be. Must just be a weird gtk+ thing or
something.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mozilla-1.1-0.beta.1mdk

2002-07-31 Thread Steve Fox

On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 15:07, Steve Fox wrote:
 I was hoping for a miracle that 1.1 would fix the radio button problem.
 But, alas, 'tis not meant to be. Must just be a weird gtk+ thing or
 something.

Ack, I forgot to say that this is in regard to Galeon crashing.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mozilla-1.1-0.beta.1mdk

2002-07-31 Thread Steve Fox

On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 15:18, David Walser wrote:
 
 They do hundreds of other kinds of patches, why not? 

Because changing the default is a lot easier than writing a patch to
have the app confirm to your locale setting, which may change at any
time after install.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] gdm restarting (was: gdm mdk theme)

2002-07-30 Thread Steve Fox

I'm starting to wonder if maybe it's a gdmlogin bug because it says the
client version is 2.4.0.4 which is the same level as the daemon. I have
already restarted the daemon too.

Does this happen to you too?

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Galeon-1.2.5 crashing like mad on forms

2002-07-29 Thread Steve Fox

On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 04:09, Andreas Simon wrote:
 
 Here is one:
 Start Galeon, open URL http://www.gnomedesktop.com . There on the 
 right is a 'Survey'. Click the first option 'More features' and then 
 press 'Vote'.

This doesn't crash for me. It's usually larger forms. 

Frederic, I have a lot of crashes on bugzilla.gnome.org. It's
semi-random, but usually happens after a few form submissions.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Galeon-1.2.5 crashing like mad on forms

2002-07-29 Thread Steve Fox

On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 09:10, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 
 The sourceforge.net download page crashes for me.. I'll use this one :))

I think Austin may have hit the nail on the head. 

EVERY form that has a checkbox crashes.

Apparently also applies to radio buttons.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] gdm mdk theme

2002-07-29 Thread Steve Fox

Frederic,

For some reason GDM is not seeing your mdk theme in the theme list.
Also, GDM doesn't appear to let you point the Install new theme dialog
at the mdk.xml file, so I will file a bug in GNOME's bugzilla on this.

-- 

Steve Fox
IBM Linux Technology Center
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc
http://k-lug.org





Re: [Cooker] gdm mdk theme

2002-07-29 Thread Steve Fox

On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 11:39, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 
 Correction, it IS a bug in Mdk GDM theme :))

I noticed the missing .desktop file after I had sent the mail.

Very nice theme, BTW :)

Another issue: Do you know if gdm-restart is supposed to work without
killing the X server? I can't find a way to restart gdm without taking
my whole desktop with it. I'm not sure if it's just something goofy on
my system or if that's how it's supposed to work.

-- 

Steve Fox
IBM Linux Technology Center
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc
http://k-lug.org





[Cooker] gdm restarting (was: gdm mdk theme)

2002-07-29 Thread Steve Fox

On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 00:09, Frédéric Crozat wrote:
 
 gdm-softrestart should do the trick...

I'm assuming you meant gdm-safe-restart. Unfortunately this doesn't do
anything for me. After running that I still get the client/daemon
mismatch error when running gdmlogin.

Is this a gdm-safe-restart bug?

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] Galeon-1.2.5 crashing like mad on forms

2002-07-25 Thread Steve Fox

Just about every other form I submit crashes Galeon. Anyone else having
this experience?

galeon-1.2.5-1mdk
mozilla-fonts-2310-8mdk
mozilla-dom-inspector-1.0.0-8mdk
mozilla-devel-1.0.0-8mdk
mozilla-1.0.0-8mdk
mozilla-mail-1.0.0-8mdk
libjs-1.0.0-8mdk
libnspr4-1.0.0-8mdk
libnss3-1.0.0-8mdk

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Galeon-1.2.5 crashing like mad on forms

2002-07-25 Thread Steve Fox

On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 16:33, Quel Qun wrote:
 
 Even 1.2.5-1mdk seems to be more stable with the new
 mozilla-1.0.0-9mdk

Good to hear. I will try that as well as -2 of Galeon. 

Thanks.

-- 

Steve Fox
IBM Linux Technology Center
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc
http://k-lug.org





Re: [Cooker] BETA 1 installation problems

2002-07-25 Thread Steve Fox

On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 16:12, Brad Felmey wrote:
 
 This is Lotus' idea of an ASCII attribution?!?

Ha! Don't even get me started on Lotus Notes' defects :)

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] urpmi-3.9-3mdk perl-URPM-0.50-4mdk b0rkage

2002-07-24 Thread Steve Fox

I don't see this reported on the mail list yet, but this is what I get
after upgrading this morning.

[root@tp mts-client-0.9.6b]# urpmi.update cooker2
Global symbol unresolved requires explicit package name at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux/URPM/Build.pm line 84.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/urpm.pm line 765.

-- 

Steve Fox
IBM Linux Technology Center
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc
http://k-lug.org





[Cooker] Request: updated S3 Savage XFree86 driver

2002-07-23 Thread Steve Fox

Currently Cooker is using the 1.1.20 driver. Prior to upgrading to a
full Cooker system (last week) I had almost never had any X crashes. I
think that is probably because I had downloaded the latest 1.1.23t
driver and had been using that for some time.

Now that I am full Cooker (and hence using the older driver) I have been
getting X lockups once a day and it's getting very frustrating. 

Could I request that the S3 Savage XFree86 driver be updated to the
1.1.23t version please?

Thanks.

http://www.probo.com/timr/savage40.html

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] Nautilus 2 mdk13 and question about cooker RPMs

2002-07-21 Thread Steve Fox

On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 16:09, Frédéric Crozat wrote:
 On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:05:37 +0200, Toni Hermoso wrote :
 
  
  nautilus: relocation error: nautilus: undefined symbol:
  nautilus_get_desktop_uri
 
 You haven't updated libnautilus package..

When something in the application requires a change in the library,
shouldn't a Requires: on the newer library be added? That way urpmi
would solve this for the user.

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




Re: [Cooker] gdm

2002-07-21 Thread Steve Fox

On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 21:15, Nathan A. Smith wrote:
 Has anyone seen this behavior?

It sounds like there was some libpng b0rkage over the weekend. You
should probably make sure that you have the latest version. I'm in the
process of updating my machine, so I guess I'll find out soon :)

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




  1   2   3   4   5   >