On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:20 PM, jamescho...@austin.rr.com wrote:
DWave comes to mind.
Sure yeah, under the list of things that can't possibly be useful in any
way for the problem described.
The DWave machine is widely considered to not be a universal quantum
computer[1], and *even if it was*, which it isn't, there are no known
quantum algorithms which offer any serious benefit in this arena.
[1] See for instance: http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1400
--
-- -- -- --
Venimus, Vidimus, Dolavimus
jamescho...@austin.rr.com
jcho...@confusionresearchcenter.org
rav...@ssz.com
james.cho...@g.austincc.edu
jchoate00...@gmail.com
james.cho...@twcable.com
h: 512-657-1279
w: 512-845-8989
http://hackerspaces.org/wiki/Confusion_Research_Center
http://confusionresearchcenter.org
http://arbornet.org (ravage)
Adapt, Adopt, Improvise
-- -- -- --
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
--
Noon Silk
Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/
Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy
of being this signature.
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography