Re: [CTRL] Microsoft Happy in Seattle, [+ a Bard commentary]

2000-06-05 Thread Bard

Aleisha (is that a male or female name?)
The 'sell out' has been going on quite some time now;  accelerating under
NAFTA.
The internationals are not only greedy for low wages, they also suck the
teats of the taxpayers in the form of Corporate Welfare/Subsidies, etc.
I dislike sounding repetitious, but there is only ONE solution, to wit:  the
busting of the DemoRat/Repub/Rat stranglehold on ballot access.  This is
extremely difficult because the Judicial system is also filled with the same
bird of prey.  IF the problem cannot be solved through the Courts, then I
foresee an armed rebellion, however, if the thugs succeed in disarming us we
have lost our last remaining option, resulting in Slavery and all the
ramifications in our Society that represents.  Keep your eye on the
litigation re. the inclusion of a viable third party candidate in the
Presidential Debates.
It's not a pretty picture.  There is the possibility that the World
financial system will collapse (credit spiral) and then the Voters will
throw the thugs out completely.  However, if this were to occur I foresee a
state of martial law where the government will use the military to maintain
order.  Since the military is so de-moralized (thanks to the rapist) there
exists, I believe, the remote possibility that the thugs could not muster
the loyalty of the military to suppress a rebellion.  The key to all this,
of course, is the access the public will have to weapons.  If we are totally
disarmed before a financial collapse occurs, they I would expect domestic
terrorism.  It's very possible that a world war would ensue (instigated by
the Fed), brought on by the financial collapse, whereby we would have to
re-establish our manufacturing base, and to appease the populace the federal
government would have to subsidize our wages with deficit financing;
inflation is the real problem here.
The respect we once had for our federal government has dissipated over the
last  two-thirds of the 20th Century to the point where the people have
lived their daily lives denying to themselves the ravages and deprivation of
our Freedom manifested by a feeling of helplessness to better their lives.
The present individual tax rates are way too high;  the RepubRats should
have reversed the rapist's horrific tax increase of 1993.
But, as we now know, they are just as bad as the DemoRats, and have been in
the forefront of globalizing our economy.
While the Insiders have  touted that the Information Technology (IT)
industry will provide jobs, the problem is that the corrupt socialist
dominated school unions have done such a good job in dumbing down our young
they can't qualify for these jobs and the ITs are importing foreign labor
supposedly skilled in IT paying them sub-standard wages and plenty of
overtime.
It's the young who have the most to lose from realizing the American Dream.
Both GeeW and algore are nothing more than mouthpieces for the Insiders;
taking their orders from the international banking cartel.
In my view, had the millions not been legally murdered using Roe vs. Wade
the jobless number would be much greater than it is today and there would
have been severe pressure from the People to right the wrongs done to us by
the Thugs.  The jobless number is distorted by virtue of so many slave wage
jobs and the yardstick to measure 'productivity' in our existing
manufacturing is no longer applicable to use.
Would appreciate your Comment, particularly with regard to events I foresee
happening.
These are observations made by a person raised in the thirties and my
Parents had to endure the Great Depression, which, if you don't know, was
brought on by the Fed stabilizing the British pound with a huge influx of
dollars/gold to Great Britain leaving the average American with no dollars
(fiat-currency) to survive;  and you know, I'm sure, what the Fed is:  the
International banking cartel.  The RepubRats in power at the time
made a serious mistake in kow-towing to the incompetent leadership of the
Fed in place at that time.
The result of all this will be the USA becoming a third-rate power.
We are on the verge of a major restructuring of our social and economic
institutions, and its implementation must be led by the leadership of
constitutional conservatives.

Bard

Tell me not, in mournful numbers,
Life is but an empty dream!
For the soul is dead that slumbers,
And things are not what they seem.
  -- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

Folks, We have been in a deep Slumber way too long now!
 "WE WANT THIS COUNTRY BACK"..http://www.klang.com/wewantcont.html
No more Lawyers..http://www.jail4judges.org/
No more illegals..http://www.webspawner.com/users/IllegalImmigration/
No more payroll tax
withholdings..http://www.house.gov/dunn/fastfacts/tax98.htm
No more same-sex
'marriages'.http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/2525/ts/pope_gays_1.html
No more homo sex education.. http://www.massnews.com/maygsa.htm
 Kids Get Graphic Instruction In Homosexual Sex
No more 

Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread Nicky Molloy

-Original Message-
From: tenebroust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.  Since there is no real evidence for it, we must just look at it all as
speculation by "army officer X", or some "covert warrior" who now wants to
come clean, etc.

Well tenebroust, I guess the reason Commander X, Branton etc use non de
plumes is because are in danger of their lives. I think anybody who just
comes right out like fool with their name, rank and serial number and starts
spouting off about the alien treaties the US govt has made with ets, really
wouldn't have that much to say. They were intelligence officers and we don't
really need to know their personal details. Other intelligence officers can
know if they are speaking the truth or not and then it spreads from
there.The information they present us with is generally self evident,
because of a consistancy that others keep verifying, that they do have
experience in inside covert operations. There are photos and documents in
these books.

Who are you? Why do you use a silly name? We don't know what country you are
from, which gender, or how old you are, yet you want respect and to be
listened to merely because your typed letters appear in our inboxes.  Tell
me why you personally don't give us your full name, address, ICQ number, CV,
recent photo, race and blood type and birthdate. I'd like to know that
before I even consider your comments on my post. You are looking for proof
of someone's rank and their name before you believe them. Yet you are doing
the same thing by hiding under a false name. Please - you don't even sign
your posts!!  So you want me to tell you, an indeterminate stranger going on
public archives how I came by my info like a complete blabbermouth
I'd have to be tortured to reveal it sorry.

Please by all means keep us posted with the latest speculation in these
areas, but let it reamin speculation and not the recitation of fact.


OK but let me say you did get warned, but took too long looking for
verifiable factual evidence to your satisfaction.

Nicky


On Sat, 03 June 2000, Nicky Molloy wrote:


 Well Tenebroust,

 I think we can safely say that American abductions could sometimes be the
 military because they sometimes pretend they are aliens by using virtual
 reality scenarios. But the American govt did build about 50 bases for the
 greys which was done by Rand Corp. I'll find the info. English people
seldom
 get abducted by greys according to a UK UFO mag. Abductees in US have gone
 underground to both grey and military bases..

 According to Branton, there are even more greys under Los Alamos than even
 under Dulce, a major nesting area going back to native American times. He
 has heard of an area near Los Alamos where the Feds bring huge shipments
of
 cattle for picking up by grey ships on an almost daily basis. It is a
 forrested area southwest of Los Alamos where pictograms of 'aliens' exist.
 So the aliens have been in that area long before the atom-jacks came in.
 Also setting off nuclear blasts burns away the membrane between this
 dimension and the next which would allow any interdimensional entities
easy
 access to our dimension. There is apparently more Ets seen in Nevada than
 some other places possibly due to the nuclear bombs.

 Other people in other countries have been abducted and people have seen
them
 rising bodily into the air and going into space ships.In South America
there
 are many stories of this. In Mexico there is a video of about 60 UFOs
 appearing in the sky at once when there was big crowd. Many hundreds saw
 them and videotaped them. Others in US have seen their partner sliding out
 of the window from their bed and rising into the air out into the sky.
There
 was story about the UN Sec, prev to this one in his car watching a woman
 float out of her highrise apartment in NY and into a spaceship. This story
 is well known. A couple of Govt agents got in touch with the woman and she
 told them, where she went as she remembered.

 Nicky





A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread David Sutherland

C'mon NICK you can't be SERIOUS about all this ET UFO B.S. - these guys are
tools - mostly book and video salesman!!!

"Conspiracy Theory" and all its associated trappings (UFO's, ETs,
Abductions, etc)  is now as much a political TOOL as everything else is.

I mean, if many of these ex-secret intel or otherwise UFO 'exposers' and
supposed 'researchers' were what they claim to be - would it be THAT
difficult to "slience" these clowns if the so-called near omnipotent "black"
government, or whatever agency is supposed to 'hush' all this nonsense up,
is really extant?

Its pure religio-political propoganda, religio - because in many cases you
will find all sorts of esoteric mumbo jumbo and 'spiritual' twadde and
hysteria associated with many of these beliefs if ETs, Abductions, UFO's,
and et al. To what purpose is this propoganda however, would be a far more
interesting and profuitable exercise and use of time imho.



- Original Message -
From: "Nicky Molloy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:


 -Original Message-
 From: tenebroust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 .  Since there is no real evidence for it, we must just look at it all
as
 speculation by "army officer X", or some "covert warrior" who now wants to
 come clean, etc.

 Well tenebroust, I guess the reason Commander X, Branton etc use non de
 plumes is because are in danger of their lives. I think anybody who just
 comes right out like fool with their name, rank and serial number and
starts
 spouting off about the alien treaties the US govt has made with ets,
really
 wouldn't have that much to say. They were intelligence officers and we
don't
 really need to know their personal details. Other intelligence officers
can
 know if they are speaking the truth or not and then it spreads from
 there.The information they present us with is generally self evident,
 because of a consistancy that others keep verifying, that they do have
 experience in inside covert operations. There are photos and documents in
 these books.


 Who are you? Why do you use a silly name? We don't know what country you
are
 from, which gender, or how old you are, yet you want respect and to be
 listened to merely because your typed letters appear in our inboxes.  Tell
 me why you personally don't give us your full name, address, ICQ number,
CV,
 recent photo, race and blood type and birthdate. I'd like to know that
 before I even consider your comments on my post. You are looking for proof
 of someone's rank and their name before you believe them. Yet you are
doing
 the same thing by hiding under a false name. Please - you don't even sign
 your posts!!  So you want me to tell you, an indeterminate stranger going
on
 public archives how I came by my info like a complete blabbermouth
 I'd have to be tortured to reveal it sorry.

 Please by all means keep us posted with the latest speculation in these
 areas, but let it reamin speculation and not the recitation of fact.


 OK but let me say you did get warned, but took too long looking for
 verifiable factual evidence to your satisfaction.

 Nicky


 On Sat, 03 June 2000, Nicky Molloy wrote:

 
  Well Tenebroust,
 
  I think we can safely say that American abductions could sometimes be
the
  military because they sometimes pretend they are aliens by using virtual
  reality scenarios. But the American govt did build about 50 bases for
the
  greys which was done by Rand Corp. I'll find the info. English people
 seldom
  get abducted by greys according to a UK UFO mag. Abductees in US have
gone
  underground to both grey and military bases..
 
  According to Branton, there are even more greys under Los Alamos than
even
  under Dulce, a major nesting area going back to native American times.
He
  has heard of an area near Los Alamos where the Feds bring huge shipments
 of
  cattle for picking up by grey ships on an almost daily basis. It is a
  forrested area southwest of Los Alamos where pictograms of 'aliens'
exist.
  So the aliens have been in that area long before the atom-jacks came in.
  Also setting off nuclear blasts burns away the membrane between this
  dimension and the next which would allow any interdimensional entities
 easy
  access to our dimension. There is apparently more Ets seen in Nevada
than
  some other places possibly due to the nuclear bombs.
 
  Other people in other countries have been abducted and people have seen
 them
  rising bodily into the air and going into space ships.In South America
 there
  are many stories of this. In Mexico there is a video of about 60 UFOs
  appearing in the sky at once when there was big crowd. Many hundreds saw
  them and videotaped them. Others in US have seen their partner sliding
out
  of the window from their bed and rising into the air out into the sky.
 There
  was story about the UN Sec, prev to this one in his car watching a woman
  float out of her highrise apartment in NY and into a 

[CTRL] N.M. Governor Advocates Implants for Inmates

2000-06-05 Thread lloyd

..

From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]:

From: Alex Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: N.M. Governor Advocates Implants for Inmates
Date: Friday, May 12, 2000 1:55 PM

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Abemarf)
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol
Subject: N.M. Governor Wants To Put Microchips In Inmates

Convict Chip Idea Stirs Ire

   Lawyer: Gov. Eyes Inmate Implants

  By Colleen Heild, Albuquerque Journal Staff Writer
  Autumn 99 - Issue No. 244


Gov. Gary Johnson has hopes that rapidly advancing computer technology
someday could help solve the problem of New Mexico's overcrowded prisons.

Much to the dismay of inmate lawyers, Johnson at a private meeting in
May [1999] raised the possibility that a futuristic form of incarceration
could include implanting microchips in convicted felons.

Johnson made the comments during an informal meeting with the chief
federal
judge in New Mexico, top state corrections officials, and lawyers
involved
in an 18-year-old lawsuit over prison conditions, according to three
people
who attended the gathering.

Johnson said during an interview this week that he wasn't implying the
state could implement such a program anytime soon.  But, he said, with
"the technology advancing all the time, we're going to have in the future
to ... be able to implement innovative ways of parole and work release."

Peter Cubra, one of the lawyers representing inmates in the prison
lawsuit
testified about the remarks earlier this month at the Legislature's
Interim
Courts, Corrections, and Criminal Justice Committee.  Cubra didnt'
divulge
where Johnson made the comments, but two ...

[TEXT MISSING FROM PHOTOCOPY]

According to Cubra, Johnson responded by saying technology is evolving to
the point that microchip implants WOULD be performed, and someday would
be relatively inexpensive.

"What the governor literally said ... was, he took his index finger and
thumb and held them about a half an inch apart and he said 'We are this
close to the time when we will have microchips avialable' and then he
took his left hand, took it to his temple and said 'AND WE CAN INSERT
THE MICROCHIPS INTO PEOPLE'S BRAINS AND CONTROL THEIR BEHAVIOR THAT WAY'"
Cubra told the legislative committee Aug. 18 in Albuquerque.

Apparently it wasn't the first time Johnson made such remarks.

People who attended the Santa Fe meeting said Johnson mentioned that he
had raised the issue during his campaign for governor.  After Johnson's
statements in May [1999] those in the room were stunned, said Cubra and
another person at the meeting.

However a third person who attended but refused to be identified said the
governor was obviously joking.

A spokesman for Conway said Thursday that the judge wouldn't comment on
any matter related to pending litigation.  Cubra brought up Johnson's
remarks urging the legislative committee to take the lead in setting
prison policy.  "This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, he
said.

He told the committee "it appeared the executive branch didn't have any
realistic attitudes about it.  A spokeswoman for the governor said last
week that Johnson was speaking in "very broad terms" when he mentioned
the microchip concept.

"He said he was talking very broadly, very future-oriented, like what
are the technologies that are being developed for prisoners, what
applications in general for new technology might there be" said
Catherine Bedell, a deputy chief of staff.

Asked Whether Johnson has any specific proposals, she said, "not yet" and
referred further questions to Corrections Secretary Karl Sannicks.

Sannicks, through a spokesman, said he hadn't heard about microchips
being used on prisoners and "it probably would be something he would not
implement."

When asked about the May meeting, Johnson said Wednesday "I was talking
about bracelets and being able to track felons out of jail, that that
technology is going to exist if it doesn't exist already.

"But it's going to exist in an affordable state and that may revol-
utionize parole, that may revolutionize incarceration as far as we know
it.  In that context, that technology certainly is in the future, is
going
to play a role in parole, in incarceration, and work release."

Asked whether he specifically brought up microchips, Johnson said, "Well,
talking about microprocessors, the advance in microprocessors, again,
that is technology in essence."

Dr. Michael Hollifield, director of the Special Problems Clinic at the
University of New Mexico medical school, said HE KNEW OF NO RESEARCH
ANYWHERE IN THE COUNTRY ON THE USE OF MICROCHIPS TO CONTROL HUMAN
BEHAVIOR.  [Eleanor White's comment: CROCK]

"There's a lot of myth and innuendo about this stuff" Hollifield said.

Hollifield's clinic offers short term cognitive and behavioral therapies
for psychiatric disorders

Forwarded for info 

[CTRL] NYP: SOMEONE'S IN BED WITH THE IRS

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

New York Post-Gossip-June 4, 2000

SOMEONE'S IN BED WITH THE IRS

By LINDA STASI


WHAT'S worse? Being stalked by Bill Clinton or being audited by
the IRS?

Answer: Both.

Just ask Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones or Elizabeth Ward
Gracen. After each woman came forward with a sexual allegation
against Big Billy the big bully, each found herself the victim of
an IRS audit and were forced to indecently expose their assets.
Last week, the feds showed up at Broaddrick's accountant's office
to check out her books.

Hey! Either these are the three unluckiest women in the world, or
something here smells worse than Clinton's socks after a jog to
McDonald's.

According to Steve Teitelbaum, former deputy counsel to the New
York State Department of Taxation and Finance, "Out of 200
million tax returns filed in '97, only 1,519,000 were audited."

In other words, if you haven't seen the president naked, you have
only a three-quarters of 1 percent chance of being audited, but
if you have and then talk about it, your chances of being audited
go up to roughly 100 percent, give or take a point.

Said Teitelbaum: "The chances of these three women, all with
claims against the president, being randomly audited by the IRS
are so astronomical as to be almost incalculable."

Paulie the rocket scientist added it up for me. "It's about a
.438 percent, or 1-in- 2,282,530, probability."

The odds that the feds will ever show up are even greater. In
fact, you stand a better chance of getting hit by lightning,
winning Lotto and meeting a straight, single man at a Liza
Minnelli concert than being raided by the IRS.

My odds just went up after writing this, so on the advice of
counsel, I am stapling phony taxi receipts and fake restaurant
tabs to paper and sweating like Richard Nixon's upper lip.

snip balance


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] US steps up challenge to a new global court

2000-06-05 Thread Nicky Molloy

US steps up challenge to a new global court
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/World/Americas/2000-06/uschallenge050600.s
html
By Rupert Cornwell


5 June 2000

The United States and Europe are on a collision course over American efforts
to undermine the authority and independence of the new International
Criminal Court (ICC) ahead of a conference to codify the court's rules of
procedure on 12 June.

The aim of Washington's massive diplomatic campaign, featuring both the
State Department and the Pentagon, is to obtain a guarantee that no American
citizen accused of war crimes, genocide or crimes against humanity could
ever be brought before the ICC. Under the rules sought by the US, the state
of which the suspect is a citizen will have to give its approval for a
prosecution or, in extreme cases, authorisation would be required from the
United Nations – meaning that the US would have the right of veto through
its permanent seat on the Security Council.

The European Union, however, is resisting the pressure, arguing that such an
exemption would reduce the court to toothless impotence. It claims that
measures already in place provide more than enough assurance that ICC rules
will not be manipulated to persecute American nationals.

The ICC, launched under the aegis of the UN and whose founding treaty was
approved by 120 countries in 1998, is seen by human rights groups as the
most important advance for the cause of international justice since the
creation of the UN.

Almost 100 states have signed the treaty, including the entire EU, most
central and south American countries, and 27 African countries. Apart from
the US, the most notable dissidents are Russia, China and the Middle East
countries with the exception of Jordan.

But Washington's hostility is what matters most, forcing a choice between a
strong court actively opposed by the most powerful country in the world and
a much feebler version that America would tolerate.

In a recent letter to European Union foreign ministers, the US Secretary of
State, Madeleine Albright, implied that if her country did not get its way,
it could withdraw from international peace-keeping and humanitarian
missions. Pentagon officials in the past have gone even further, suggesting
that Washington might consider pulling its forces out of Europe.

The ostensible US objection is that it might be subject to "frivolous"
prosecutions by its foes as the world's pre-eminent and thus most resented
power. The more likely reason is entrenched American suspicion of the UN and
all its works.


  news | World  | Americas

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Clinton tells int'l terrorists: Attack these major U.S. cities- then martial law (fwd)

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 04:21:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Clinton tells int'l terrorists: Attack these major U.S.
cities- then martial law

(sent to USCMike1's 39,615+ readers - please repost to your own
mailing lists and newsgroups - Thanks).

Dear Citizens, Patriots, Veterans, et al:

 Here is the list of 120 major U.S. cities that Clinton has
told international terroists to attack.  He has repeatedly
broadcast, publicized, and advertised this list to the world for
the past four years that I have been intimately involved with
exposing the New World Order, its proponents, its plans, and its
present accomplishments.

 During this time I have attempted to obtain the specialized
training from the federal and local agencies necessary to avoid,
recognize, decontaminate, and medically treat exposure to NBC =
Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical warfare and weapons of mass
destruction as to be perpetrate by international and/or domestic
"terrorists."

 But, they refuse to allow any CIVILIAN to receive the
training.  ONLY the feds and certain state, county, city and
local government agencies, including medical centers and law
enforcement agencies have been allow to receive the training to
protect themselves, the government employees and of course the
politicians.

 It is governmentally forbidden (already in certain cities
and states)  for civilians to learn how to protect themselves
from ANY type of physical attack, NBC attack, or conventional
warfare attack as from guns, ammunition, and other implements of
war - including would you believe it, protective gas masks.  The
government officials say that gas masks are considered to be
implements of war and therefore CIVILIANS are forbidden from
obtaining, possessing, or using them.

 Why?  Very simple.  We CIVILIANS are the intended targets.
Notice that NO government officials nor agencies are advertised
to be the targets.  Why?  This is all part of the plan for the
New World Order rich, elite, illuminati genocide mongers to
depopulate the earth.  They want the present 6 billion people
population to be reduced to 500 million or even to 200 million.
This is so the 300 elites, with their one million population
families and protectors (the top 1/2%) can have the entire world
with its natural resources naturally renewed over time all to
themselves -

 -and of course the remainder of the population will be the
totally oblivious scientific automatons and engineers along with
199 million chemically lobotomized imbecilic work slaves to feed,
clothe, bathe, pamper, care for, be sex objects for, and
modern-day entertainment gladiators for the Luciferian elites.

 I have sent this post out dozens of times but it seems that
now many more people are beginning to wake up and shake off the
shackles of SHEEPLE-hood and they are genuinely interested in the
FACTS of and the plans of the New World Order.  So below I have
copied the list of 120 major U.S.  cities that Clinton has
determined that he wants terrorists to attack.

  However, throughout his entire presidential career, Clinton
has NEVER been able to coax, entice, prod, or cause ANY
international or domestic terrorists to attack the U.S.  All of
the supposed international and/or domestic terrorists that the
feds have lied to us about attempting to commit acts of terrorism
have turned out to be U.S. military and federal MK-Ultra Mind
Contol subjects or U.S. paid mercenary terrorists under orders
directly from the feds and indirectly from Clinton himself.

Thanks to JOE [EMAIL PROTECTED] for asking for the list of cities
and to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas Walker) for making it
available.  Anyone can visit the U.S. Army Chemical and
Biological Warfare web sites and get the same information but the
last time I tried all of the sites were locked as off limits to
civilians.

 If you are interested in how far away from these cities you
should be and in which directions please don't hesitate to
contact either me or Doug Walker.  OBTW, Doug and a few other
Patriots have established safe areas in the north western section
of the state of New Mexico to avoid the NBC attacks.

Best regards, USCMike

Subj:   CITIES FOR ATTACK
Date:   6/4/00 8:04:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From:   A HREF="mailto:JOE HOYLE"JOE HOYLE/A
To: A HREF="mailto:USCMike1"USCMike1/A

HELLO

I would like a copy of the 120 or so cities named as being
vulnerable for a possible NBC attack. Thanks for your time. BYE -
joe.((( ' }

Subj:  [Fwd: Targeted U.S. Cities] Date:  2/2/99 12:12:27 PM
Pacific Standard Time From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas Walker)
Reply-to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Johnson)

This attached list will surprise some, but the many people that I
worked with in the past informed me of a different pattern.

Since (we will not mention here) American Agencies were supplying
and aiding the means for Islamic 

[CTRL] Judge Denies Soldier Over Anthrax Shot

2000-06-05 Thread Nicky Molloy

Judge Denies Soldier Over Anthrax Shot
BY THOMAS D. WILLIAMS
The Hartford Courant
June 02, 2000
http://www.ctnow.com/scripts/editorial.dll?bfromind=1007eeid=2455631eetype
=articlerender=yck=ver=hb1.3

A federal judge in Denver Thursday denied a temporary injunction on behalf
of a Fort Carson soldier challenging her other than honorable discharge
because she refused to take the mandatory anthrax vaccine.

Despite the ruling against the soldier, Pfc. Jemekia Barber, the case could
yet become a crucial test of the legality of the military's only vaccine in
use against biological warfare. Hundreds of service members have left the
military rather than take the shots, or are being prosecuted for refusing to
take them.

It still could be months before U.S. District Judge Edward Nottingham
decides the crucial issue of whether the Pentagon obtained proper legal
approval to use the vaccine from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

This is only the second court case nationwide challenging the vaccine. The
first one, in Pittsburgh, ended in a compromise, setting no legal precedent
for the legality of the drug.

In a Canadian case, a judge in a military court has ruled that a soldier
there could not be court-martialed for refusing the vaccine because the drug
is probably unsafe.

BioPort Inc. of Lansing, Mich., the Pentagon's sole supplier, manufactures
the drug for both U.S. and Canadian forces.

Barber, 26, said she did not want to take the drug because of warnings on
the label that the vaccine could cause adverse reactions, including
sterility, and possibly harm her future unborn children.

Her husband, Rodney, just received an other than honorable discharge in
place of a court martial because he too refused to take the vaccine.

Ginger Colburn, a Ft. Carson spokeswoman, said now that the judge refused to
block Jemekia Barber's discharge, she will immediately receive the same
treatment as her husband. So if Jemekia Barber loses the case, they will
both be denied service member benefits.

Jemekia Barber is asking for an honorable discharge, yielding benefits. And,
if she wins the case, she will seek that same discharge for her husband.
Barber's lawyers, Herb Fenster and Louise Bouzari, say the U. S. Department
of Defense is using the vaccine illegally. They argue that it was
manufactured to protect persons from infections obtained through skin cuts,
and not for protection against inhalation of spores used for biological
warfare. The National Institutes of Health said recently that there is no
evidence that the drug is effective against biological agents.

But assistant U.S. attorneys Mike Hegarty and Peter Krumholz are asking
Nottingham to dismiss Jemekia Barber's lawsuit. They argue that the court
does not have the power to order the Army to do what she wants. In addition,
they say the court does not need to order a general or honorable discharge
for her because Barber can get similar relief in the military appeals
system.

The U.S. military plans to inoculate all 2.4 million troops against anthrax
as protection against biological warfare, and has already inoculated about
445,000. But, because the manufacturer has been denied approval to release
its own newer product, it may run out of the vaccine in July, well before
all troops can receive the drug.


Read More
Link to our special package:
ANTHRAX VACCINE UNDER FIRE

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Clinton tells int'l terrorists: Attack these major U.S. cities- then martial law

2000-06-05 Thread Nicky Molloy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, 5 June 2000 21:37
Subject: Clinton tells int'l terrorists: Attack these major U.S. cities-
then martial law


(sent to USCMike1's 39,615+ readers - please repost to your own mailing
lists
and newsgroups - Thanks).

Dear Citizens, Patriots, Veterans, et al:

 Here is the list of 120 major U.S. cities that Clinton has told
international terroists to attack.  He has repeatedly broadcast, publicized,
and advertised this list to the world for the past four years that I have
been intimately involved with exposing the New World Order, its proponents,
its plans, and its present accomplishments.

 During this time I have attempted to obtain the specialized training
from the federal and local agencies necessary to avoid, recognize,
decontaminate, and medically treat exposure to NBC = Nuclear, Biological,
and
Chemical warfare and weapons of mass destruction as to be perpetrate by
international and/or domestic "terrorists."

 But, they refuse to allow any CIVILIAN to receive the training.  ONLY
the feds and certain state, county, city and local government agencies,
including medical centers and law enforcement agencies have been allow to
receive the training to protect themselves, the government employees and of
course the politicians.

 It is governmentally forbidden (already in certain cities and states)
for civilians to learn how to protect themselves from ANY type of physical
attack, NBC attack, or conventional warfare attack as from guns, ammunition,
and other implements of war - including would you believe it, protective gas
masks.  The government officials say that gas masks are considered to be
implements of war and therefore CIVILIANS are forbidden from obtaining,
possessing, or using them.

 Why?  Very simple.  We CIVILIANS are the intended targets.  Notice that
NO government officials nor agencies are advertised to be the targets.  Why?
This is all part of the plan for the New World Order rich, elite, illuminati
genocide mongers to depopulate the earth.  They want the present 6 billion
people population to be reduced to 500 million or even to 200 million.  This
is so the 300 elites, with their one million population families and
protectors (the top 1/2%) can have the entire world with its natural
resources naturally renewed over time all to themselves -

 -and of course the remainder of the population will be the totally
oblivious scientific automatons and engineers along with 199 million
chemically lobotomized imbecilic work slaves to feed, clothe, bathe, pamper,
care for, be sex objects for, and modern-day entertainment gladiators for
the
Luciferian elites.

 I have sent this post out dozens of times but it seems that now many
more people are beginning to wake up and shake off the shackles of
SHEEPLE-hood and they are genuinely interested in the FACTS of and the plans
of the New World Order.  So below I have copied the list of 120 major U.S.
cities that Clinton has determined that he wants terrorists to attack.

  However, throughout his entire presidential career, Clinton has NEVER
been able to coax, entice, prod, or cause ANY international or domestic
terrorists to attack the U.S.  All of the supposed international and/or
domestic terrorists that the feds have lied to us about attempting to commit
acts of terrorism have turned out to be U.S. military and federal MK-Ultra
Mind Contol subjects or U.S. paid mercenary terrorists under orders directly
from the feds and indirectly from Clinton himself.

Thanks to JOE [EMAIL PROTECTED] for asking for the list of cities and to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas Walker) for making it available.  Anyone can
visit
the U.S. Army Chemical and Biological Warfare web sites and get the same
information but the last time I tried all of the sites were locked as off
limits to civilians.

 If you are interested in how far away from these cities you should be
and in which directions please don't hesitate to contact either me or Doug
Walker.  OBTW, Doug and a few other Patriots have established safe areas in
the north western section of the state of New Mexico to avoid the NBC
attacks.

Best regards, USCMike

Subj:   CITIES FOR ATTACK
Date:   6/4/00 8:04:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From:   A HREF="mailto:JOE HOYLE"JOE HOYLE/A
To: A HREF="mailto:USCMike1"USCMike1/A

HELLO

I would like a copy of the 120 or so cities named as being vulnerable for a
possible NBC attack. Thanks for your time.
BYE - joe.(((   '   }

Subj:[Fwd: Targeted U.S. Cities]
Date:   2/2/99 12:12:27 PM Pacific Standard Time
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas Walker)
Reply-to:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Johnson)

This attached list will surprise some, but the many people
that I worked with in the past informed me of a different
pattern.

Since (we will not mention here) American Agencies were
supplying and aiding the 

[CTRL] [Fwd: Off shore ISP's (complete)]

2000-06-05 Thread Nurev Ind Research

 Original Message 
Subject: Off shore ISP's (complete)
Date: 4 Jun 2000 22:23:20 -0500
From: MichaelP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: ?
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

I think this is similar to the way in which the brits were forced to end
the BBC's monopoly on broadcasting - opened up the spectrum to commercial
stuff. Of course, the issues here could be totally different.

Cheers MichaelP

=

Americans turn a tin-pot state off the brit coast into world capital of
computer anarchy

INDEPENDENT (london) 5 June 2000 By Steve Boggan

A group of American entrepreneurs is setting up the world's first offshore
"data haven", complete with armed guards and a radar defence system, less
than eight miles off the English coast.

From the air, the "principality" of Sealand appears to be nothing more
than a small platform on two concrete pillars in the North Sea. But closer
up  -- and deeper down  -- Sealand grows in size and in stature.

Soon, this concrete fortress from which British serviceman once shot down
German fighters, but which is now crawling with pony-tailed computer
wizards, will take on an importance hugely disproportionate to its size.

Within sight of the port of Felixstowe, Suffolk, the future of e-commerce
and a form of anarchy that will terrify governments is being born.

"Prince" Michael Bates, his father, "Prince" Roy, who is the founder of
Sealand, and a team of American computer experts from the Anguilla-based
firm HavenCo Ltd, are about to launch the only place in the world where
legitimate businessmen and Cali cocaine dealers can rub shoulders,
virtually and in complete anonymity.

Its establishment is a direct attack on legislation currently passing
through the House of Lords while, in terms of importance, it can be rated
alongside the establishment of offshore tax havens such as the Caymen
Islands.

By locating their servers, the tools that allow website access,
communication and financial transactions, in the bowels of Sealand,
e-companies' business transactions, messages and records will be safe from
the prying eyes of the police, intelligence and tax authorities.

"It's a marvellous concept  -- and great fun!" said Prince Michael, 47, as
his new friends from Silicon Valley, California, unloaded the latest of
many pieces of hi-tech equipment from a helicopter.

"Over the years, my father has been approached by hundreds of people
suggesting uses for Sealand, but he has rejected them all  -- particularly
the illegal ones. But when we were approached with this idea we loved it.

"It is about freedom and liberty and making it easier for people to do
business in private and to express themselves freely."

His is the libertarian view. But in Whitehall, there will be a different
take  one that reflects worries about paedophiles and drug dealers and
villains. The Foreign Office yesterday said it did not recognise Sealand
as an independent state.

Sealand began life as Roughs Tower, one of a number of concrete fortresses
built off the east coast of England during the Second World War as a
defence against German air attack. Unlike the other platforms, Roughs was
built outside British territorial waters, seven and a half miles east of
Felixstowe, so after the war, when the others were demolished, Roughs was
abandoned intact.

On 2 September 1967, Roy Bates, a retired British army major, occupied the
fortress and claimed it. He argued that it had been abandoned in
international waters and was his to take. The following year, the navy
expressed concern over Mr Bates's presence and sent some boats. He fired
warning shots at them and was hauled before the courts, only to argue
successfully that the newly named Sealand was beyondits jurisdiction. A
legal basisfor independence had beenestablished.

In 1978, three years after Sealand declared itself a sovereign
principality, a group of Dutch and German businessmen visited with a
business proposition. While they were there, they took the fortress by
force, holding Prince Michael prisoner for three days.

He was freed in a counterattack from the air by Prince Roy, and the
businessmen were taken as "prisoners of war".

When Germany asked Britain to intervene, it was told the fortress was
beyond British jurisdiction  -- the second time, according to the Bateses,
that Sealand had had de facto recognition of its sovereignty. The
prisoners were released after the arrival of a German diplomat.

Today, Sealand comprises two vast cylindrical towers and a platform
linking them. It lies in only 30 feet of water, even though it is miles
from land. As you arrive by helicopter, you are welcomed by "security", a
number of armed and cheerful former British servicemen. They diligently
patrol the deck and helipad round-the-clock.

Climbing down the ladders of the north tower's seven storeys  -- three of
them below sea level  -- is like going back in time. There are the
remnants of bunks occupied by artillerymen, an ancient, purring generator
and an arsenal, 

Re: [CTRL] Conspiring Toward a Multi-Poley World

2000-06-05 Thread Tenorlove

--- Aleisha Saba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mr. Poley:  I see you are Ph.D. 

I know people who will state unequivocally that Ph.D. stands for
Piled Higher and Deeper. snort



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

From: "Nicky Molloy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Well tenebroust, I guess the reason Commander X, Branton etc use non de
 plumes is because are in danger of their lives.

And you have EVIDENCE to support this claim?   ;-)


 They were intelligence officers and we don't
 really need to know their personal details.

Yes we do, if we are to adequately and accurately assess their credibility.


 Other intelligence officers can
 know if they are speaking the truth or not and then it spreads from
 there.

By that argument, you destroy any credibility these supposed 'ex-intelligence
officers' may have...because one would presume that if they were indeed
going public with such secret and shocking news, that if there old comrade
in arms didn't 'off' them, all those aliens under all those military bases
WOULD

If we HAVE been invaded by aliens who are being held under military bases,
I for one am not going to lose sleep at night if they are so ineffectual as
to not be able to silence all these supposed 'ex-intelligence officers' from
revealing all these supposed secrets


 The information they present us with is generally self evident,
 because of a consistancy that others keep verifying,

The same statement can be made of disinformation and propaganda.  Disinfo and
propaganda only work if they have 'consistancy that others keep verifying'...
because the very 'facts' that are used to 'verify' is itself disiniformation...


 that they do have experience in inside covert operations.

So they CLAIM, but what EVIDENCE is there that their claims are valid?


There are photos and documents in these books.

Photos and documents can easily be faked.


 You are looking for proof
 of someone's rank and their name before you believe them. Yet you are doing
 the same thing by hiding under a false name.

The difference is that Tenebroust isn't making any wild claims about being
an ex-CIA agent, to having inside knowledge of Top Secret information regarding
space aliens, etc.

If someone is going to make extraordinary claims, they better be prepared to
provide background information on themselves, and documentation to support
their claims.  If they don't, then anything they claim should be taken with a
grain of salt...


 Please - you don't even sign your posts!!

And how do we know that "Nicky Molloy" isn't a pseudonym?

And yes, I use a 'fake ID' as part of my email address, and only sign with
my first name...but again, it is not _I_ who is making extraordinary claims
regarding my background, nor claiming to have 'The Truth' regarding space
aliens.


 OK but let me say you did get warned, but took too long looking for
 verifiable factual evidence to your satisfaction.

Because YOU present it as 'fact'.  No one would object if what you post
you clearly labeled as SPECULATION, what we object to is you posting it
as if there were hard EVIDENCE to support your speculation.  So far you
have not provided one iota of evidence.


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread Nicky Molloy

June,

I'm sorry to have to tell you this but really this is tiring and its a darn
less boring than reading you saying the same confudsed comments every post.
If you can't/won't grasp the situation and get your own information which is
readily available on the net, I can't help you. Provide evidence that there
aren't aliens here because if you investigate, there is more evidence that
there is company down in underground bases than not.  I"ve been studying the
situation for at least 10 years, and have personal experiences and know
UNTOLD others who have had dealings with Ets. The last thing I'm going to
say to you personally about this just to ask yourself this.

If there are 6 billion people on this planet, untold thousands of UFOs
flying about and still we stubbornly believe we are the only planet
inhabited in this solar system, and any of these UFOs out there could have
colonized the whole solar system by now, if it wasn't already inhabited,
then could it be that not enough people have given it enough thought till
now, and still they can't/won't see they are being conned by the fake moon
photos and fake photos of whatever else out there indicating that there is
no life.They are airbrushing UFO's off moon and Mars shots.C'Mon June wake
up.
CASE CLOSED

Nicky



-Original Message-
From: Ynr Chyldz Wyld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, 6 June 2000 00:29
Subject: Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:


From: "Nicky Molloy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Well tenebroust, I guess the reason Commander X, Branton etc use non de
 plumes is because are in danger of their lives.

And you have EVIDENCE to support this claim?   ;-)


 They were intelligence officers and we don't
 really need to know their personal details.

Yes we do, if we are to adequately and accurately assess their credibility.


 Other intelligence officers can
 know if they are speaking the truth or not and then it spreads from
 there.

By that argument, you destroy any credibility these supposed
'ex-intelligence
officers' may have...because one would presume that if they were indeed
going public with such secret and shocking news, that if there old comrade
in arms didn't 'off' them, all those aliens under all those military bases
WOULD

If we HAVE been invaded by aliens who are being held under military bases,
I for one am not going to lose sleep at night if they are so ineffectual as
to not be able to silence all these supposed 'ex-intelligence officers' from
revealing all these supposed secrets


 The information they present us with is generally self evident,
 because of a consistancy that others keep verifying,

The same statement can be made of disinformation and propaganda.  Disinfo
and
propaganda only work if they have 'consistancy that others keep
verifying'...
because the very 'facts' that are used to 'verify' is itself
disiniformation...


 that they do have experience in inside covert operations.

So they CLAIM, but what EVIDENCE is there that their claims are valid?


There are photos and documents in these books.

Photos and documents can easily be faked.


 You are looking for proof
 of someone's rank and their name before you believe them. Yet you are
doing
 the same thing by hiding under a false name.

The difference is that Tenebroust isn't making any wild claims about being
an ex-CIA agent, to having inside knowledge of Top Secret information
regarding
space aliens, etc.

If someone is going to make extraordinary claims, they better be prepared to
provide background information on themselves, and documentation to support
their claims.  If they don't, then anything they claim should be taken with
a
grain of salt...


 Please - you don't even sign your posts!!

And how do we know that "Nicky Molloy" isn't a pseudonym?

And yes, I use a 'fake ID' as part of my email address, and only sign with
my first name...but again, it is not _I_ who is making extraordinary claims
regarding my background, nor claiming to have 'The Truth' regarding space
aliens.


 OK but let me say you did get warned, but took too long looking for
 verifiable factual evidence to your satisfaction.

Because YOU present it as 'fact'.  No one would object if what you post
you clearly labeled as SPECULATION, what we object to is you posting it
as if there were hard EVIDENCE to support your speculation.  So far you
have not provided one iota of evidence.


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL 

Re: [CTRL] Conspiring Toward a Multi-Poley World

2000-06-05 Thread Aleisha Saba

Well Tenorlove, I guess it takes one to know one .

One has the feeling Dr. Poley sits on top of the world and laughs as the
rest goes by.

A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Al Gore - So Thats a Sex Symbol

2000-06-05 Thread Aleisha Saba

It appears Al Gore has not decided with whom to identify this election.
Now this man did look like Christopher Reed, but then an accident put
Reed out of the Superman picures.  But even prior to that, the creator
of Superman decided to have him killed off, for his creator saw what was
coming down the pike.Al Gore.

This article was sent to me today, and I thought that is it - this is
the real Al Gore.   Nothing about him is real, he is a figment of
somebody's imagination.   Like a Pygmalion, he is being sculpted daily
into something he is not, and it just does not fit.

Who is Al Gore.   For what does he really stand.  Could you ever call
him a leader?  That is the question.   So Lyndon LaRouche - here I come.
You got my vote.   Bully?  LaRouche, for it is written isn't it in the
psalms "for they shal come out of prisons to rule over you".

Or is all Arkansas sick in the head.   To produce such a man as Clinton?

A Saba

   Message  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Fwd: ET: Al's got 'loser' tattooed where he can't see it

From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Sun, Jun 4, 2000, 11:54pm

To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

  Electronic Telegraph-Friday 2 June 2000
  Al's got 'loser' tattooed where he can't see

  By Mark Steyn

  PRIMARY season isn't, technically, over. The Democrats had one
down in Arkansas the other day - 78 per cent voted for Al Gore while the
other 22 per cent voted for Lyndon LaRouche, the distinguished felon and
eccentric who claims the Queen is behind the international drug trade.
  Let's hope Al sees off this latest challenge - President LaRouche
parachuting DEA assault teams into the grounds of Buckingham Palace
might lead to a certain tension in the "special relationship".
I won't pretend to understand the minds of the Arkansan
electorate, and even President-in-waiting LaRouche seemed surprised by
the result: he never campaigned during the primary yet he performed
better against Gore in Arkansas than Bill Bradley did in states he spent
months schlepping around.
  Some say it was just a bit of mischief-making by Gore-baiters,
others that some of those upcountry swamp-dwellers had confused Mr
LaRouche with his fellow Lyndon, the late President Johnson. But neither
explanation quite accounts for 50,000 real, live Arkansans delivering
nearly a quarter of the Democratic vote to the publisher of such tomes
as Jail Cocaine Kingpin George Bush (referring to George Snr).
  Whatever the reason, the fact that even Bill Clinton's home state
is antipathetic to his chosen successor is merely the latest wobbly
indicator for Mr Gore.
Isn't it supposed to be Dubya who's in trouble? After Super
Tuesday, the consensus was that Gore had emerged from the primaries much
stronger than Bush. As you'll recall, Bush had supposedly run a vicious,
negative campaign against McCain that had left the GOP hopelessly
divided; utterly repelled the moderate, centrist voters he'd need;
destroyed his image and exposed him as an empty suit with no ideas.
Hmm. I think the media are indulging in what the
psychologists call "displacement". There is a guy who ran a vicious,
negative campaign that's left his party divided and repelled moderate
centrists, but his name's not Dubya. The Republicans may have had to use
a cattle prod to get McCain to endorse Bush, but at least he did it.
Over in the Democratic camp, Bradley's still refusing to endorse Gore.
New ideas? Dubya's got a zillion, all of which the
vice-president dismisses as a "risky scheme". Al's campaigning as a
human Denver boot: stay exactly where you are, America; do not attempt
to move. Empty suit? Al's got an empty suit hanging in his closet. His
advisers told him to squeeze into polo shirts and casual pants that
would seem indecently tight on a Chippendale.
  When he was campaigning up here in New Hampshire, his nipples
entered the room like an advance security team. Stumping the banks of
the Connecticut River, the vice-president's sculpted butt, squeezed into
jeans two sizes too small, looked like some novelty scale model of the
landscape - the mountains and the giant cleavage of the Connecticut
river valley in between.
And yet, despite his butt, the women voters who turned out
for Clinton don't want to know. He reminds me a bit of Barbie's
boyfriend, Ken: he's buff, he's honed, he looks fabulous, but he has no
private parts. I'm not referring to his distinguishing characteristics,
but to a general lack of human personality. Clinton puts together a
focus group to find out what he should do; Gore puts together a focus
group to find out who he should be.
Not only is there no detectable Clinton fatigue, but Clinton
himself has been a beneficiary of a premature Gore fatigue. Back when
the Monica thing started, I was listening to the gal who runs my general
store do her usual riff on the President: he's revolting, he's
loathsome, he's contemptible, he's lower than a skunk, etc. "So you want
him to 

Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread William Shannon

In a message dated 6/5/00 7:58:22 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I'm sorry to have to tell you this but really this is tiring and its a darn
 less boring than reading you saying the same confudsed comments every post.
 If you can't/won't grasp the situation and get your own information which is
 readily available on the net, I can't help you. 

As an "friend of the court" might I simply echo June's sentiments and say
that there's a big difference between FACT and WILD SPECULATION.

Bill.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread Robert F. Tatman

snort Actually, I figured it was that even the grey aliens couldn't
understand what the British were saying...  Arthur Clarke wrote a story
years ago about first contact in which the aliens land in Yorkshire, having
carefully studied human radio broadcasts and learned perfect (American)
English. Naturally, the first person they meet speaks a dialect so broad
that the only people who can understand him are his immediate neighbors, and
even *they* aren't always certain what he's said.

- Original Message -
From: "Ynr Chyldz Wyld" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:


 From: "nessie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 English people seldom
 get abducted by greys according to a UK UFO mag.
 
  Maybe they taste bad.

 Remember the old Twilight Zone episode "To Serve Man"?

 Perhaps the space aliens know UK cuisine sucks...   ;-)


 June


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Japan and Project Echelon

2000-06-05 Thread lloyd

..

From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]:

From: Paul Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Japan and Project Echelon
Date: Monday, May 29, 2000 12:05 AM



JAPAN AND PROJECT ECHELON

by Jens Wilkinson

http://www.twics.com/~anzu/Japanwatch/Security/Echelon1.html


In Misawa, Aomori Prefecture, near the northern tip of Japan, lies a sprawling
US Air Force base, best known as the home to the 35th Fighter Wing and its
squadron of F-16 jets. But Misawa is actually a more grandiose facility. The
huge complex includes a host of installations in addition to the Air Force
landing strip. In particular, some six kilometers north of the airstrip, there
is a mysterious array of antennae and radar domes (or 'radomes'), a cornucopia
of sophisticated surveillance equipment.

But surveillance for what? Oficially, the large radar site is operated jointly
by various sections of United States intelligence. On the official home page
of Misawa Base, a host of units are listed -- all military units of one sort
or another. There is an Army unit with some 700 personnel, an Air Force group
with 900, a Navy unit with 700, and even a small Marine Corps detachment of 70.

Somehow, though, with the Soviet Union having collapsed and the Chinese
government doing all it can to ensure it can enter the WTO smoothly, it is
difficult to believe that all that hardware is focused on the sole 'rogue
nation' of the region; i.e., North Korea.


Intriguingly, among the intelligence groups that use Misawa base, there is at
least one "unlisted" member. It is the US National Security Agency, headquar-
tered in Fort Meade, near Washington DC. This body was relatively unknown
until very recently. In 1986, however, it gained notoriety thanks to a young,
soft-spoken lieutenant colonel named Oliver North, who made daily appearances
on US national TV, explaining how he had lied to Congress, how he had sold
weapons illegally to Iran, and how he had funneled the proceeds from these
sales to the anti-government Contra guerrillas in Nicaragua. Today, the NSA
even has a home page, though the site only confirms its existence, as well
as the fact that it is involved in "signals intelligence and communications
security."

As it turns out, the NSA presence at Misawa may be crucial. There was a
series of revelations in 1997 and 1998, primarily from Europe, that the NSA
was operating a global intelligence network, called Project Echelon, with
the goal of monitoring virtually all electronic communications - telephone,
facsimile, satellite, or telephone - around the world. According to the
so-called STOA Report, issued by the European Commission, the core of this
network is at Fort Meade, but there are stations peppered throughout the
global U.S. alliance, with the largest station at a place called Menwith
Hill, in Yorkshire, England.

The Echelon Project, part of a secret intelligence treaty called UKUSA
(signed by the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), was built
up during the Cold War, primarily for the purpose of intercepting signals
from the Soviet camp. With the end of the Cold War, however, its role has
apparently changed to surveillance of "terrorists," as well as economic
intelligence.

This network also had a secondary function: to circumvent domestic privacy
laws in the different countries. Many nations have laws protecting their
own citizens from being spied on by their own intelligence agencies (for
example, the CIA is legally prohibited from conducting domestic operations).
But here lies the brilliance of the Echelon logic. If the US spies on
Japanese citizens, and provides this information to the Japanese government,
and the Japanese government spies on US citizens, again sharing this
intelligence, then both sides can claim they are acting within the law.

Misawa clearly has a major role in this global intelligence network. During
the Cold War years, it was generally believed that the huge radar site was
primarily focused on the Soviet Union and North Korea, and it had the
particular task of monitoring communications from three Soviet satellites
Richelson, p. 182).

In recent years, however, a more sinister mission has come to light. Part
of the Echelon mission has come to include the monitoring of Japanese
diplomatic cables, for example, as well as the communications between
trading companies and their branches in other countries. The network has
apparently been used to boost the American position in trade negotiations
with Japan.

Of course, this puts Japan in an awkward spot. In some cases, it appears,
the array was aimed not at the outside but rather at the inside of Japan.
The array may, in fact, be a huge facility with the primary goal of
intercepting messages - via radio waves, microwaves, even conventional
telephone lines - inside Japan. It is rumored that agencies such as the
NSA may have powerful software that allows them to listen 

[CTRL] The CIA's Drug Smugglers

2000-06-05 Thread William Shannon

DAVID CORN:
IN PLAIN SIGHT: THE CIA KEEPS GETTING AWAY WITH IT

A few weeks ago, the House intelligence committee released a forty-four page
report that declared the CIA had nothing to do with the rise of crack in Los
Angeles in the 1980s. Why did the agency need to be exonerated of such
malfeasance? Because a controversial 1996 San Jose Mercury News series by
reporter Gary Webb exposed a group of California-based Nicaraguan
drug-dealers who in the 1980s had supported the Nicaraguan contra rebels
battling the leftist Sandinista regime. The contras, of course, had been a
pet project of President Ronald Reagan and the covert cowboys he put in
charge at the CIA. The headlines on the Mercury News pieces suggested that
this particular band of contra backers shared responsibility for triggering
the crack wave that wreaked havoc on inner-city communities across the
nation. "America's 'crack' plague has roots in Nicaragua war," read the
day-one headline. "Shadowy origins of 'crack' epidemic," read the next day's.
"Role of CIA-linked agents a well-protected secret until now." Thousands
rushed to read the stories on the newspaper's website. The phonelines at
black radio talk shows lit up. Members of Congress, particularly those in the
Congressional Black Caucus, demanded answers from the CIA. (Even today, the
CIA says that its recruitment of African-Americans suffers because of these
stories.) The CIA director at the time, John Deutch, felt obligated to attend
a town meeting in Watts to deny the charges.

And what passes for investigation in Washington began. The CIA's inspector
general examined the allegations of the "Dark Alliance" series. The Justice
Department did the same. Not surprisngly, the CIA's own gumshoes -- and those
of Justice -- pronounced the CIA not guilty of complicity in the crack
explosion. Webb's series had its problems. He had unearthed a good tale of
contra drug involvement, but he had not uncovered a definite link between the
agency and these dealers, and his suggestion that this one drug outfit was
instrumental to the birth of crack epidemic was far-fetched. Now, the House
intelligence committee, nearly four years later, has seconded the verdicts of
the CIA and the Justice Department: "The committee found no evidence to
support the allegations that CIA agents or assets associated with the contra
movement were involved in the supply or sale of drugs in the Los Angeles
area."

But the case is not closed -- that is, it should not be closed. The spies'
overseers in the House -- the people who keep an eye on the CIA for the rest
of us -- also confirmed, in a quiet fashion, the real dirty secret of the
CIA: that during the contra war, the agency worked hand-in-cloak with persons
it had reason to believe were smuggling drugs. In a report released in late
1998, the CIA inspector general acknowledged that the agency, obsessed with
its contra mission, had on a number of occasions collaborated with suspected
drug-runners. This should have been a scandal in itself. The report provided
the details of several examples. It also noted that the "CIA did not inform
Congress of all allegations or information it received indicating that
contra-related organizations or individuals were involved in drug
trafficking." Put more bluntly: the CIA had covered up the contra-drug
connection. A CIA official who served in Central America told the inspector
general, "Yes there [was] derogatory stuff [on the contras] ... but we were
going to play with these guys." Webb had gotten near this truth. In the
middle of the just-say-no Reagan years, a federal agency had indeed struck a
"dark alliance" -- not the one Webb had depicted, but one as disturbing. This
revelation, though, received scant media attention; most news coverage echoed
the CIA's self-exoneration regarding the crack charges.

The House intelligence committee investigation repeats the pattern. The bulk
of the report is directed at disputing the crack allegations. But toward the
end there is understated recognition that scandalous CIA activity did happen:
"As described in Volume II of the CIA IG report, under various circumstances,
the CIA made use of or maintained relationships with a number of individuals
associated with the contras or the contra-supply effort about whom the CIA
had knowledge of information or allegations indicating the individuals had
been involved in drug trafficking."

Now why does the House intelligence committee have nothing else to say on
this front? It preferred flogging Webb one more time to examining the real
skullduggery. Moreover, the committee interviewed several senior CIA
managers, and these people insisted they could only recall only one single
report of contra-related drug-dealing. But with the CIA inspector general
having determined there had been many such instances, it's plausible (make
that, likely) that these CIA officials did not speak truthfully to the
committee. Did the committee's report address this contradiction and 

[CTRL] CIA urged to spy on all foreign students

2000-06-05 Thread William Shannon

June 5 2000  UNITED STATES

CIA urged to spy on all foreign students

FROM BEN MACINTYRE IN WASHINGTON

TO TACKLE the threat of international terrorism, the US should monitor every
foreign student within its borders, encourage CIA agents to recruit more
"unsavoury" informants and impose sanctions on friendly states who fail to
act against terrorists, according to a Congressional report published today.
The US National Commission on Terrorism, set up by Congress two years ago
after the bombing of US embassies in East Africa, gave warning that US
anti-terrorism policies were "seriously deficient" and recommended a series
of drastic measures that have angered its allies accused of tolerating
terrorism.

The most radical element in the report is a proposal to begin surveillance of
every foreign student on US soil, since "a small minority may exploit their
student status to support terrorist activity".

To keep track of potential student-terrorists, government officials should be
made aware whenever a foreign student changes academic course suspiciously,
say, "from English literature to nuclear physics", the commission said.

If the proposal is taken up, Laura Spence, the British schoolgirl rejected by
Oxford and now heading to Harvard, could find herself monitored.

The report, a blueprint for future counter-terrorism policy that is expected
to prove influential on Capitol Hill, argues that Greece and Pakistan, close
allies of the US, should be listed with Afghanistan as "not fully
co-operating on counter-terrorism". That would bar those countries from
buying American military equipment.

"The threat is changing, and it's becoming more deadly," Paul Bremer III, a
former anti-terrorism expert at the State Department and the commission
chairman, said. The investigation found the CIA had become unnecessarily
cautious and gave warning that "this has inhibited the recruitment of
essential, if sometimes unsavoury, terrorist informants".

While not giving the agency "carte blanche to hire thugs and murderers",
agents were too restricted by human rights guidelines on recruiting
informants, Jane Harman, a former member of Congress and a panel member,
said.

Bill Harlow, a CIA spokesman, said: "CIA headquarters has never turned down a
request to use someone - even someone with a record of human rights abuse -
if we thought that person could be valuable to our overall counter-terrorist
programme."

The ten-member commission, made up of senior security and intelligence
officials, singled out Pakistan for providing "safe haven, transit, and
moral, political and diplomatic support to several groups engaged in
terrorism", and Greece, a Nato ally, for being "disturbingly passive in
response to terrorist activities".

The US has made inadequate preparations for a "catastrophic terrorist threat
or attack" involving biological, chemical or nuclear weapons, the panel
concluded.

President Clinton should officially designate the US military, rather than
the FBI or the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as the body prepared to
respond to such an attack, the report said.

"We need to take better steps to get ahead of the curve on biological
terrorism. We need to be ready, and we're not," Mr Bremer said.

Pakistani officials insisted Islamabad was providing "extensive co-operation"
on anti-terrorism measures, while Greece rejected the report's allegations as
"totally unfair".

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Conspiring Toward a Multi-Poley World

2000-06-05 Thread Tenorlove

--- Aleisha Saba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well Tenorlove, I guess it takes one to know one .

Who me? I only have a B.A. .. yes, in my case it stands for Bad A**

But I spent enough time in "academentia" to know the type.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Al Gore - So Thats a Sex Symbol

2000-06-05 Thread Tenorlove

This is THE most oxymoronic subject heading I've ever seen in an email.

ROTFLMAOPDML

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] TOO CORRUPT TO BE AN ARKANSAS LAWYER

2000-06-05 Thread ThePiedPiper

Most people have respect for themselves and
their job not to do it where they can easily
get caught.  Like "accidentally" meeting her at
Camp David or something like that.  Still some
might think that Clinton is a sensationalist,
I just think that he is a lazy in his sex life as
he seems to be at everything else.  Somebody made
a comment that Hillary has had more women than
Bill Clinton, so is he more concerned about competing
with Hillary than he is with being president?

Someone could make a case that even the President seems
to need external control - like an implanted chip.
ThePiedPiper 05June2000

Prudence L. Kuhn wrote:

 In a message dated 05/31/2000 9:03:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Most winning on the crucial everybody-does-it point was F. Lee
  Bailey, who claimed on CNN's "Larry King Live" that if "all the
  lawyers who have lied about the fact they had a little affair on
  the side should turn in their licenses" then "Shakespeare will
  have won. We will have killed all the lawyers." I wondered how
  his wife was enjoying that part of the show. 

 You're absolutely right.  In honor of wives, all husbands (lawyers in
 particular and I'm remembering that when I was nineteen, I had a short
 struggle with mine (lawyer that is) should lie and insist only those "other
 guys" ever would do such a thing.  That will make all the wives feel a lot
 better.  I'd like to stretch it even further.  I want every guy who ever made
 an unsolicited pass at a woman or who cheated on his wife to drop dead.  That
 should give us a lot of breathing space on this planet.  Prudy

 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
 misdirections
 and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
 minor
 effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
 CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
 A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
  A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

--
Any person can stand adversity,
The true test is to give a person power.

If you treat a relationship as if you are the only one in it, eventually
you will be.

Atrocities happen when the people about you -
 start considering you surplus.

"I tolerate with the utmost latitude the right of
others to differ from me in opinion"
   Thomas Jefferson brbr

My Grandfather told me there are two kinds of people:
those who do the work and
those who take the credit.
He told me to be in the first group -
 there is less competition there. -
Indira Gandhi

http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/ThePiedPiper/~index.htm
ICQ 14484977
NEW
http://ThePiedPiper.tripod.com/site_map.htm

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread nessie

[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
 I will posture another scenario the great Hoax of all time. How to
achieve One World Government and total domination of the people by the New
World Order?

Easy: Create an Alien threat so dangerous that we are all glad to
surrender our sovereignty we will be happy to surrender or Constitutional
rights to combat the ET Menace.


National sovereignty is in it's death throws. The WTO, the IMF, the WB,
the OAS, the EU, the CIS, NATO and to a considerably lesser extent the UN,
are quickly replacing it all over the world. Even China, supposed last
bastion of autarchy, is scrambling as fast as it can to join the bleating
flock. The era of national rule is ending. The era of corporate hegemony
is upon us.

Those of us fortunate enough to live in countries where Constitutional
rights actually exist, at least on paper, still cling to the quaint
delusion that paper can stop bullets. But it isn't true. Paper can't even
stop jackboots. It never could.

Outside of that, yeah, I agree with you. Reagan said much the same thing
in a speech in the eighties. Characteristically, he put a positive spin on
it, but it amounted to the same thing.

Watch and wait ET one day will manifest themselves by the thousands in
our skies.

It's far more likely that  a clever illusion will manifest in our skies
and we'll be led to believe it's ET.

See: http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/12.html

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Konformist: 'Hanoi Jane' Rumors Blend Fact and Fiction

2000-06-05 Thread William Shannon





Please send as far and wide as possible.

Thanks,

Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com

http://urbanlegends.about.com/science/urbanlegends/library/weekly/aa110399.htm
?terms=jane+fonda

 'Hanoi Jane' Rumors Blend
 Fact and Fiction

 Dateline: 11/03/99 

 By David Emery 

 Email rumors blending fact and fiction about Jane
 Fonda's activities as an anti-war protester during
 the 1970s have reopened old wounds for Vietnam
 veterans and inspired a new round of recriminations
 for things the actress did long ago, and things she
 never did. 

 The rumors (see next page) center around Fonda's
 tour of North Vietnam in 1972, during which she
 cozied up to the enemy, posing for photo ops with
 communist troops and broadcasting anti-American
 propaganda over Radio Hanoi. 

 During the same trip she participated in a staged
 press conference with American POWs, the
 purpose of which was to demonstrate that they
 were not being mistreated by their captors. Years
 later when the released POWs described the
 torture and degradation they really did suffer at the
 hands of the North Vietnamese, Fonda called them
 "hypocrites and liars." 

 Those facts are not under dispute. Fonda's behavior
 at that time, considered treasonous by some,
 earned her the nickname "Hanoi Jane" among the
 veterans and POWs of the Vietnam War, some of
 whom hate her to this day. 

 Since the '70s Fonda has revamped her image
 several times over, rededicating herself to her acting
 career, becoming a fitness guru in the early '80s,
 and marrying billionaire Ted Turner in 1991. In
 1988 she delivered a televised apology to Vietnam
 veterans and their families, a gesture that didn't
 mollify everyone but established some distance
 between the new Fonda and old Fonda, whose
 actions, she finally admitted, had been "thoughtless
 and careless." 

 As the '90s progressed Fonda's past was less
 frequently brought up as an issue and seemed to
 dwindle in importance – until this year, that is, when
 Barbara Walters chose to honor the actress in a TV
 special called "A Celebration: 100 Years of Great
 Women." The announcement of the program –
 which aired in April 1999 and did honor Jane
 Fonda – prompted an instant outcry from veterans
 and ex-POWs, many of whom vented their
 indignation via the Internet. Angry recriminations
 were posted in newsgroups, published in
 newsletters and on Web pages, and shared by
 email. 

 Apparently bits and pieces of these texts, along with
 a few shameless fabrications, were cobbled
 together by persons unknown to create the "Hanoi
 Jane" diatribe which still circulates today. Parts of it
 are true and parts of it are false.

 Though we don't know precisely when versions of
 the "Hanoi Jane" message first began making the
 rounds (presumably among veterans and military
 personnel), they found their way into general
 circulation in early September. Each of the versions
 I've seen exhibits slight variations in format and
 wording, and in some cases added comments
 and/or deletions. 

 Jon E. Dougherty, a columnist for WorldNetDaily,
 saw fit to quote a version of the message verbatim
 in his September 15 column entitled "Not saluting
 Jane Fonda." Interestingly, Dougherty's piece,
 complete with his own commentary, was copied
 and distributed by readers and quickly established
 itself as another popular variant of the
 already-circulating text. [Update: Mr. Dougherty
 published a correction on Nov. 10.] 

 Below is a representative 

Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread Aleisha Saba

Nessie:   Either we run this government or this government runs us.   Is
there anything more obnoxious or disgusting than a Civil SERVANT with a
little bit of power, power mind you, not necessarily authority.

Some of these people are so stupid they had to lower testing scores for
them to get one foot in he door, and these are the most dangerous types.

Frankly I prefer the old order, when men were gentlemen and served their
country and cherished the Constitution.

So, these people are without authority and as far as I know as a
conspiracy theorist, the only person I ever heard of who demanded this
World Court was the Charles Manson family.

Figure that one for this is a return to the 60 period, only it did not
work then, and it will not work now.   This group wants a Civil War in
order to call for Martial Law.

Think they will find out that people are not like sheep; they might take
a lot and remain silent as they put their families first.   But, once
you tread upon the toes of the wrong people, well look at Clinton - he
cannot go out the front door without 800 armed SS men, 20 black
heliocopters, and an entourage long enough to be mistaken for a funeral
procession.

We have one thing which our forefathers gave to us and it cannot be
changed without a vote - and that is the right to vote.

These people are so insane they live in a world of their own, for it was
none of my making.

If we are luckey, the ET's will get them first.

A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Clinton: Internet Can Fight Poverty (???)

2000-06-05 Thread Eagle 1



I will give "SLICK WILLIE" the benefit of the 
doubt... 
The guy has a vivid imagination 
... 

[[[ but with infinite ulterior motives 
behind 
his fork-ed tongue...  ]]]


Clinton: 
Internet Can Fight Poverty 
BERLIN, Jun 03, 2000 
(AP Online via COMTEX) -- President Clinton 
floated some ideas Saturday for how the Internet could be used to improve lives 
and fight poverty in the developing world, from downloading school books in poor 
villages to marketing native crafts in cyberspace. 
"We should recognize what an enormous potential the Internet has for bridging 
economic, educational and social divides," Clinton said at the closing of a 
Berlin conference on retooling government for today's global information 
society. 
Clinton noted that Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien told the other 
leaders about how his government had connected remote Eskimo villages to the 
Internet. 
"That has enormous health implications, enormous educational implications 
and, my guess is, enormous economic implications," Clinton said. 
If schools in poor or remote spots had Internet-access, they'd also have the 
same access to knowledge as the rich world, he said. 
"If you have a printer and a computer in a poor village, you don't have to be 
able to afford textbooks anymore," he said. "It's a far more efficient way for 
government to spread universal information." 
Clinton also suggested "a systematic effort to use e-commerce" to market 
native arts and crafts from Latin America and Africa, which he said would 
"increase the income of poor people in villages dramatically." 
He also described something he saw on his recent trip to India. A new mother 
was able to get quality up-to-date information on how to care for her baby by 
going into her village's health office and calling up a Web page. 
"We're going to keep more babies alive because of the Internet," he said. 
"Those of us in the wealthier countries should be providing the money and the 
technical support for countries to do more of this," he said, "because it will 
move more people more quickly out of poverty I think than anything that's ever 
been out there, if you do it right." 

By PAUL GEITNER Associated Press Writer 
Copyright 2000 Associated Press, All rights reserved 

Find this story at:
http://www.andovernews.com/cgi-bin/news_story.pl?220585/topstories



++



Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread Samantha L.

In a message dated 6/5/00 2:51:41 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Its pure religio-political propoganda, religio - because in many cases you
  will find all sorts of esoteric mumbo jumbo and 'spiritual' twadde and
  hysteria associated with many of these beliefs if ETs, Abductions, UFO's,
  and et al. To what purpose is this propoganda however, would be a far more
  interesting and profuitable exercise and use of time imho.

   There's little doubt in my mind that there are fear-mongers and
disinformants aplenty out there.  I agree that trying to discern the purpose
of the propaganda would be worthwhile.

It isn't the intellect alone that is equips us with discernment.  The
personal accounts of such people as Whitley Strieber, Betty Andreasson Lucas
and others, including those accounts outlined in John Mack, M.D.'s books are
quite moving and compelling.

In my opinion, black operation tactics simply cannot account for the
spiritual growth and awakening that is taking place among experiencers, those
who work with them, and those who test them.

There's one case some may be interested in - the experience of Katherine
(k.t.) Frankovich.  The Frankovich account is absent much of the overwhelming
emotional content of other accounts, but it is interesting and
thought-provoking.
Her experience is summarized at the CNI News site:

http://www.cninews.com/CNI_Contact.html#Frankovich

"CNI News is aware of many reports of alien encounters, describing many
bizarre beings. As a rule, we would not present such a report by a single
witness, lacking other evidence. But the witness in this case seems to be
especially credible and well-qualified, and was interviewed by respected
researcher, author and filmmaker Linda Moulton Howe, who characterizes this
story as "one of the top two or three" eyewitness encounter reports she has
ever recorded. We present this unusual case in the public interest, with no
guarantee of its authenticity."

  The full account is here:

http://members.aol.com/KFrnkovich/index.html  (Go to UFO/ET encounters and
scroll down to "The Lime Grove Encounters"
--

Samantha

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] rapist wants queer-friendly fedgov't-proclaimsJuneHomoPrideMonth

2000-06-05 Thread Bard



"NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, 
President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authorityvested 
in me by the Constitution and laws of the UnitedStates, do hereby proclaim 
June 2000 as Gay and LesbianPride Month."-Bill Clinton, June 2, 
2000.

Last Friday, Bill Clinton once again proclaimed 
June as beingGay and Lesbian Month - at least the second year he has done 
so. He encouraged all Americans - gay or straight - to "celebrate" 
thatwith appropriate ceremonies and activities.Clinton's idea of 
"celebrating" Gay and Lesbian Pride Month isto commemorate the "Stonewall 
Uprising" - a notorious New York City riot of 30 years ago prompted by a police 
raid on a gay bar. Apparently, Clinton has bought into the gay mythology 
that today'sgay-pride movement began with a three-day riot.Clinton also 
boasted during this proclamation last Friday that"more openly gay and 
lesbian individuals serve in senior poststhroughout the federal government 
than during any otheradministration." But don't worry, Clinton wants to 
make the federal governmentyet more queer-friendly; he said Friday that the 
Clintons/GoreAdministration will keep fighting for laws to outlaw 
discriminationagainst gays and lesbians at work. http://www.alamanceind.com/

BardPro Libertate - For 
FreedomBUCHANAN-Reformhttp://gopatgo2000.com/default.htm

Broaddrick's audit is part of an effort by the 
Clinton-Gore White House to keep all the so-called Clinton women quiet during 
the campaigns of Mr. Gore and Mrs. Clinton.-- Tom Fitton, 
president of Judicial Watch 


[CTRL] Fwd: [RMNEWS] PAPARAZZI WITNESS TO DIANA DEATH MURDERED -- BURNED BEYOND RECO...

2000-06-05 Thread William Shannon





  A 
HREF="http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000/06/04/stinwenws03006.h
tml"THE SUNDAY TIMES: NEWS/A 
 
June 4 2000 BRITAIN 

Diana paparazzo's burnt body found


http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000/06/04/stinwenws03006.html

David Leppard and Gavin Walsh 


A KEY witness in the police investigation into the death of Diana, Princess 
of Wales has been found dead in mysterious circumstances in remote woodland 
in southern France. 

The charred body of James Andanson, a leading paparazzo who hounded Diana and 
her lover Dodi Fayed in the days before their deaths in Paris, was found by 
soldiers on military exercise in a burnt-out car near the village of Nant. 

Andanson, 54, was initially a suspect in the criminal inquiry by French 
police into the car crash which killed Diana, Dodi and Henri Paul, their 
driver, in August 1997. He and his family were questioned about his 
involvement with the pack of photographers that trailed the couple as they 
holidayed in the Mediterranean in the week before the crash. 

Andanson was also quizzed about his ownership of a white Fiat Uno, of the 
sort that clipped the princess's Mercedes as it sped into the Alma tunnel, 
where the accident occurred. Although the car and its driver have never been 
traced, Hervé Stéphan, the judge investigating the crash, concluded that the 
presence of a white Fiat Uno was a significant cause of the tragedy. 

Detectives are puzzled by Andanson's death, which they say occurred in a 
"very discreet and isolated" woodland in the Aveyron region of southwestern 
France. His body was said to have been burnt almost beyond recognition. 
Although found four weeks ago, Andanson was formally identified by DNA tests 
only last week. 

He had been missing since leaving his Paris home at the beginning of last 
month. This weekend police said they had not ruled out foul play. 
Lieutenant-Colonel Gerry Plane said that although Andanson had been showing 
serious suicidal tendencies, there would always be doubts about his death. 

Extracts from confidential police files obtained by The Sunday Times show 
that detectives established that Andanson was in possession of a white Fiat 
Uno at the time of the crash in August 1997. Detectives said, however, that 
the paint on Andanson's Fiat did not match that recovered from the scrape 
marks on the Mercedes. 

The car was seized by police five months after the crash from a car dealer, 
to whom Andanson had sold it in October 1997. It was of such interest to 
Mohamed al-Fayed, Dodi's father and the owner of Harrods, that a detective 
working for him took photographs of it and offered to buy it. 

Andanson's son, also called James, said last week that his father never spoke 
about the Paris crash. "At the moment, we don't know why my father died," he 
said. 





















 
 


Missing old school friends?  Find them here:
http://click.egroups.com/1/4055/1/_/163550/_/960228148/


RMNews, The Uncensored National Rumor
http://www.rumormillnews.com
THE ONLY RUMOR YOU CAN TRUST

RUMOR MILL NEWS AGENCY 
P.O. BOX 1784
APTOS, CA 95001
TELFAX 831 462 3949

WHY WAS PRINCESS DIANA MURDERED?
http://www.dianaqueenofheaven.com






[CTRL] Reno's girlfriend

2000-06-05 Thread Bard



It didn't take more than a few 
hours for an Internet appealfor information on Janet Reno's "past" to 
produce results.According to multiple sources - one of whom used to work 
inthe court system in Miami - Reno's "girlfriend" was Ann Bishop, aMiami 
television anchorwoman at WPLG-TV. Reno and Bishop had a long-term 
relationship. Courthousesources frequently saw them at parties together. It 
was thestanding joke of the district attorney's office at the time 
Renoheaded it - and the standing joke around Miami.Bishop was about 
Reno's age - and died of cancer Nov. 14, 1997at age 66. Soon after, a 
lawsuit was filed, challenging Bishop's will -which left her entire $1.8 
million estate to two other women"friends."Bishop was also a close 
friend of Sister Jeanne O'Laughlin,the nun who is also a close friend of 
Reno's - who Reno tried tohave mediate the Elian Gonzalez 
dispute.
http://www.alamanceind.com/nation/nation_27.html

BardPro Libertate - For 
FreedomBUCHANAN-Reformhttp://gopatgo2000.com/default.htmTo 
support Mr. Buchanan in the White Housewe must send to Congress 
Constitutional conservatives who will:
Restore the United States to "One 
Nation Under God" Return to Constitutional, Limited Government 
Protect the Inalienable Right to Life of All, including the Unborn and 
Infirm Protect Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms 
Restore National Sovereignty, including Withdrawal from the U.N. 
Maintain a Strong National Defense Repeal the 
Unconstitutional Income Tax Stop All Unconstitutional Spending 
Protect the Inalienable Rights of Liberty and Private Property 
Abolish the Federal Reserve and Restore Constitutional Money 
Promote Pro-family policies End Federal Subsidies for and 
Control of Education and Welfare Comprehensive Immigration Reform 
Return Control over Elections to the People Abolish Special 
Interest Entitlements (corporate welfare) 


Re: [CTRL] Oops/ k.t. Frankovich full account

2000-06-05 Thread Samantha L.

In a message dated 6/5/00 12:51:52 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

  The full account is here:

  http://members.aol.com/KFrnkovich/index.html  (Go to UFO/ET encounters and
  scroll down to "The Lime Grove Encounters"

  My mistake.  Only a small exerpt is on that page.  I found a much more
detailed verson here:

http://members.aol.com/kfrnkovich/UFO.html#Lime

Samantha

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Supreme Court rules against grandparent rights

2000-06-05 Thread Eagle 1


Supreme Court rules against grandparent rights

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court today curbed states' power to help
grandparents visit their grandchildren against parents' wishes, a decision
that could touch every American family.
"So long as a parent adequately cares for his or her children ... there will
normally be no reason for the state to inject itself into the private realm
of the family to further question the ability of that parent to make the
best decisions concerning the rearing of that parent's children," Justice
Sandra Day O'Connor wrote in the court's main opinion.

The decision in a case from Washington state yielded six opinions from the
nine-member court, but no one opinion attracted a majority of five.

Parents' right to raise their children free from government interference
generally trumps state laws aimed at giving grandparents broad rights to
seek visitation, the court ruled by a 6-3 vote.

The decision invalidated a state law that allowed "any person," relative or
nonrelative, to win a court-ordered right to see a child any time such
visitation was found to be in a child's best interest.

All 50 states have grandparent-visitation laws but few are as expansive as
Washington's.

"Because we rest our decision on the sweeping breadth of (Washington's law)
and the application of that broad, unlimited power in this case, we do not
consider the primary constitutional question passed on by the Washington
Supreme Court - whether the (Constitution's) due-process clause requires all
nonparental visitation statutes to include a showing of harm or potential
harm to a child as a condition precedent to granting visitation," O'Connor
said.

"We do not, and need not, define today the precise scope of the parental
due-process right in the visitation context," she said.

Joining O'Connor were Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Ruth
Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer.

Justices David H. Souter and Clarence Thomas wrote concurring opinions.

Justices John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia and Anthony M. Kennedy each wrote
dissenting opinions.

In his concurring opinion, Thomas said he agreed with O'Connor "that this
court's recognition of a fundamental right of parents to direct the
upbringing of their children resolves this case."

The court first acknowledged such a right in 1925.

Stevens said in dissent that the invalidated Washington law "merely gives an
individual - with whom a child may have an established relationship - the
procedural right to ask the state to act as arbiter, through the entirely
well-known best-interests standard, between the parent's protected interests
and the child's."

He said the Constitution "leaves room for states to consider the impact on a
child of possibly arbitrary parental decisions that neither serve nor are
motivated by the best interests of the child."

The case, pitting a state's desire to promote children's best interests
against parental rights, has been one of the most closely watched and
emotionally charged in recent Supreme Court history. Sixty million Americans
are grandparents, including six of the court's members.

A recently released survey by AARP found about one in nine American
grandparents above the age of 50 helps care for at least one grandchild. The
survey showed that 8 percent provide day care regularly, and 3 percent
function as parents, rearing a grandchild.

The Washington law had been struck down by the state's highest court, a
ruling that wiped out an Anacortes, Wash., couple's legal right to see their
two granddaughters.

Gary and Jenifer Troxel had gone into state court to seek more time with the
two girls, 10-year-old Natalie and 8-year-old Isabelle.

The girls' father, Brad Troxel, committed suicide in 1993. He and the girls'
mother, Tommie Granville, were never married. When they separated, Troxel
lived with his parents. The girls regularly visited their father at the
Troxels' home.

After Brad Troxel's death, Natalie and Isabelle continued seeing their
grandparents regularly until their mother limited their visits. The Troxels
went to court in late 1993, and two years later were awarded visitation of
one weekend a month, one week during the summer and four hours on the girls'
birthdays.

While Granville appealed, she married Kelly Wynn. He then adopted Natalie
and Isabelle.

The Troxels, married for 35 years, have three other children and five
grandchildren in all. Gary Troxel, a longshoreman, has been since his high
school days a member of the Fleetwoods, a singing group that made such pop
classics as "Come Softly to Me" and "Mr. Blue."

The decision comes at a time of decline for nuclear families and a rise in
the number of nontraditional families.

Among those urging the justices to move slowly in weighing the competing
rights in such disputes were lesbian rights groups who say "de facto"
parents - those who played a significant parentlike role in a child's life -
should get visitation rights. Those persons could be 

[CTRL] New theory on the mystery of the origin of life

2000-06-05 Thread Eagle 1

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 5 JUNE 2000 AT 09:00 ET US

Contact: Jeffrey J. Sussman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
212-895-7951

Weizmann Institute
New theory on the mystery of the origin of life proposed by Weizmann
Institute scientists
New model based on lipid molecules

REHOVOT, ISRAEL--June 5, 2000-- One of the greatest mysteries, which
continuously fascinates many scientists worldwide, concerns the way by which
life emerged on primeval Earth. The accepted notion is that prior to the
appearance of living organisms, there was a stage of chemical evolution,
which involved selection within inanimate chemical mixtures. This is thought
to have eventually led to the crucial moment, when self-replicating
molecules arose. As self-replication is a most fundamental characteristic of
living entities, such an event is often defined as the birth of life.
Self-replication of molecular systems is often viewed in the context of
information content. Many scientists believe that life began with the
spontaneous emergence of biopolymers, such as proteins or RNA, where
information is stored in the sequence of chemical units. Experiments
mimicking the conditions on Earth billions of years ago have shown how such
chemical units, e.g. some of the building blocks of proteins and RNA, could
appear spontaneously. Yet, the emergence of proteins or self-replicating RNA
molecules remained enigmatic.

This started Prof. Doron Lancet of the Crown Human Genome Center in the
Weizmann Institute of Science, and his students, Daniel Segre and Dafna
Ben-Eli, on a journey leading to alternatives to proteins and RNA. They have
developed a model, suggesting a new route for the origin of life, based on
lipid molecules. This model is described in an article published in a recent
issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA.

Lipids are oily substances, known as chief ingredients of the cell's
membranes. Lipids have two different aspects - one hydrophilic
(water-attracting), and the other hydrophobic (water-repelling). They get
readily synthesized under simulated prebiological conditions, and because of
their bipartite nature, have the tendency to spontaneously form
supramolecular structures made of thousands of molecular units. This is
exemplified in lipid assemblies (micelles), which have even been shown to be
capable of growing and splitting in a fashion reminiscent of cell
replication. Yet a critical question was left unanswered: how could lipid
assemblies carry and propagate information?

The model proposed by Lancet and colleagues offers a solution. They surmise
that early on, lipid-like compounds existed in a very large diversity of
shapes and forms. They show mathematically that under such conditions, lipid
assemblies could contain almost as much information as an RNA strand or a
protein chain. Information would be stored in the assembly's composition,
i.e. in the exact amount of each of its compounds, rather than in a sequence
of molecular "beads" on a string. A useful analogy would be that of perfume:
the information – the scent as discerned by receptors in the nose – depends
on each ingredient's proportion in the mixture, but the order in which
aromas are added is unimportant.

Thus, the authors argue, heterogeneous lipid assemblies may be thought of as
having a "compositional genome". They further demonstrate how a droplet-like
lipid assembly, when growing and splitting, could manifest a form of
inheritance. Their computer simulations show how a compositional genome
would be handed down with some fidelity to the offspring assemblies. A
crucial aspect of the model is how such molecular inheritance is made
possible. In present-day cells, the replication of information-containing
DNA is facilitated by protein enzyme catalysts. In the early prebiological
era, catalysis could be performed by the same lipid-like substances that
carry the information. Molecules already present inside a droplet would
function as a molecular selection committee, enhancing the rate of entry for
some, and rejecting others.

Lancet, Segre, and Ben-Eli designed a computerized simulation that shows
how, based solely on physiochemical principles, lipid droplets with
idiosyncratic compositions accrete, grow, split, self-replicate, accumulate
compositional mutations, and get involved in a complex evolutionary game.
Importantly, it is entire assemblies, with their complex mixtures of
relatively small molecules that are replicated.
This differs from the older models, in which a single, long RNA polymer is
what gets copied. The scientists' model makes very few chemical assumptions
and derives a rich molecular behavior reminiscent of life processes. It
therefore has the potential of constituting the long-sought bridge leading
from the inanimate world to that of living organisms.

This research has already attracted considerable interest, and was quoted in
the recently published new edition of the classic book Origins of Life by
Freeman Dyson from the Princeton 

[CTRL] 1_Study of Waco-Overview

2000-06-05 Thread Bard



BEYOND THE VOICE OF REASONby Dr. Fran 
Haga

A Criminology Professor'sStudy Of 
Waco

In her heavily-documented 28-page report, 
Dr. Fran Haga - a criminology professor at Pembroke State University - wrote of 
her extensive investigation of what took place during and after the first Waco 
raid. 

While the report was submitted to the 
congressional committee investigating Waco in 1995, its contents have never had 
wide public exposure.

One key factor in the Waco "myth" promoted by 
the Clintons Administration is that the Branch Davidians as a whole - and not 
just their leader David Koresh - were a bunch of antigovernment extremists. 


However, Dr. Haga notes that nearly half of the 
women in Koresh's group were British citizens - hardly the stereotype ofa 
bunch of rural right-wing extremists.

Dr. Haga's extensive research led her to the 
conclusion that on-the-scene efforts had moved from the realm of law enforcement 
to the realm of warfare - with the traditional extreme regard by American police 
for the lives of women and children caught up in barricaded-suspect scenarios 
disappearing into what she termed wartime "rules of engagement" two years before 
the award-winning dissident film on Waco with a similar title came out. 


Dr. Haga's view of the result was that 


"... unidentified warring groups of men became 
locked ina lethal combat. Focused on each other, they created alethal 
environment where the deaths of the mothers andthe children were simply 
collateral damage. Untargeted."

Or, as Dr. Haga also put it:

"Legally, the individual rights of mothers and 
childrencannot be ignored in a law enforcement operation againsta home. 
Traditionally, homes have been protected becausethey are historically 
recognized as the final refuge ofmothers and children."

Her sharp condemnation of the systematic use of 
armored vehicles to cave in much of the home of the Branch Davidians as if all 
those inside were now legitimate targets of deadly force. 

http://www.alamanceind.com/nation/nation_2.html

BardPro Libertate - For 
FreedomBUCHANAN-Reformhttp://gopatgo2000.com/default.htm




[CTRL] 2-Study of Waco-How They Really Died

2000-06-05 Thread Bard



"Efforts to establish responsibility for the Mt. 
Carmel failed law enforcement effort have foundered repeatedly on the presumed 
inability of establishing in any descriptive evidentiary way exactly what was 
the nature and extent of the deaths involved. 

This report shows that the evidence exists and 
it can be described clearly, in common language."-p. 27, "Beyond The Voice 
Of Reason," Dr. Fran Haga

If nothing else, criminology professor Dr. Fran 
Haga makes abundantly clear that autopsy reports alone indicate that 
thoseBranch Davidians who were shot dead didn't all die of suicidal wounds - 
nor of "mercy killings" by comrades scared by the fires resulting from the FBI's 
armored-vehicle assault on their flimsy building. 

This casts grave doubt on Washington's - 
continued to this day - claim that the FBI resolved the standoff "without 
firinga single shot."

From p. 5-10 of her report, Dr. Haga examines 
the autopsy report of each dead Branch Davidian. 

Physical evidence indicates that some, like 
30-year-old David Jones, died before the fire - so they hardly suicided in panic 
to avoid being burned alive; their lungs had no traces of smoke inhalation. 


Others, like 28-year-old Novellette Hipsman, are 
still-less-plausible "suicides"; Hipsman had two gunshot wounds - either of 
which would have been fatal in itself, and the lack of soot in her lungs also 
shows she was dead before the fire. 

Some who did die after the fire started - as 
shown by having inhaled the soot from it - such as 38-year-old Neal Veaga, had 
gunshot wounds highly implausible for suicide, in his case being straight back 
through his forehead.

Steve Sneider - Koresh's second-in-command - 
died before the fire, as indicated by the lack of soot in his lungs, so he 
didn't kill himself out of fear of being burned when he saw the fire either. 


More to the point, a gunshot-residue test on his 
body found that it wasn't a close-range wound when he was shot in themouth, 
with the bullet exiting the back of his head.

And since only 20 of the 80-odd Davidians who 
died in the siege had any gunshot wounds on their bodies, it sure wasn't 
anorganized "mass suicide" like the Jonestown, Guyana one at 
all.http://www.alamanceind.com/nation/nation_3.html

BardPro Libertate - For 
FreedomBUCHANAN-Reformhttp://gopatgo2000.com/default.htm



[CTRL] JonBenet Ramsey the Sex-Ring Allegations

2000-06-05 Thread lloyd

..

From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]:

From: Alex Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JonBenet Ramsey  the Sex-Ring Allegations
Date: Monday, May 15, 2000 11:30 PM

 This is the full text of a censored op-ed column written by Evan
Ravitz, an activist in Boulder, Colorado, concerning sex-ring
allegations, arising from the JonBenet Ramsey murder investigation, that
he attempted to give members of the grand jury. Now, he is taking his
case to the public. The censored column appeared in the Boulder
Daly-Camera, a local daily:

'Nothing is what it seems' in Ramsey case
by Evan Ravitz

When Ramsey case lead investigators Det. Cmdr. Tom Wickman and Det. Tom
Trujillo interviewed myself and Robert McFarland, MD, co-founder of
Boulder's Parenting Place for an hour at my home last May 5, Detective
Wickman remarked "Nothing is what it seems in this case." Here are
several examples that have not received media coverage, yet:

DA Alex Hunter concluded his recent retirement statement by saying,
regarding the Ramsey case: "I believe most people feel their district
attorney has done right by the law." Mr. Hunter did not say he followed
the law, only that people think he did. He did not follow this law:

Colorado Revised Statute 16-5-204 (l) states "Any person may approach the
prosecuting attorney or the grand jury and request to testify or
retestify
in an inquiry before a grand jury or to appear before a grand jury." Dr.
McFarland and I, after discovering that Dr. McFarland's mailings to the
jury foreman had been intercepted, sent material directly to jury members
at their homes on June 28. For thus exercising our right under Colorado
law to "approach" our fellow citizens the grand  jury, we were threatened
with prosecution for Contempt of Court! And ridiculed by editor Hartman
of
this newspaper.

It was not until September 23rd that I read the above law myself. The
Colorado ACLU Intake Director told me on October 8 that they would take
our case, although this was too late to be of use, with the grand jury
about to disband. Perhaps there will be another. But valuable time has
been lost. The Denver Post reported on 3/15/00 that Hunter also tried to
keep his own investigator Lou Smit away from the grand jury until Smit
sought a court order to enforce the above law!

Our evidence is similar to that which the woman from San Luis Obispo,
California and her therapist have been giving Boulder police in recent
weeks, featured in a long lead article (by editor Hartman) on February
25, and others since, relating to a pedophile ring having abused and
killed JonBenet.

At Hunter's press conference on October 14th, investigative journalist
Joe
Calhoun (who shares in an Academy award for the documentary The Panama
Deception) asked why Dr. McFarland and I had been repeatedly prevented
from contacting the grand jury, in spite of the law. Hunter replied that
a
judge's order (Daniel Hale's) forbade us, which seemed to satisfy the
media. Yet, every lawyer knows that even judges and DAs must obey state
laws. Why would these leaders of Boulder's justice system deem it so
important to keep us from the grand jury that they would repeatedly
violate this law?

The substance of our testimony to the police and what we still want
investigated is what it seems Hunter most wanted to avoid: the
possibility
that accused pedophiles in very high places in Boulder -we suggested two
names- had both motive and means to de-rail the investigation in the
first
hours, possibly by calling off the FBI.  The motive would be to keep the
wide-ranging spotlight of a media case like this away from people like
themselves, whether they were involved or not.

Normally, the FBI would immediately assume jurisdiction over an apparent
kidnapping by "a small foreign faction" (so read the "ransom note") of
the
child of a Defense contractor executive. (Lockheed-Martin owned Access
Graphics.) Detective Linda Arndt has stated that she asked for the FBI
and
police backup before she even arrived at the Ramsey home and was told no.
This left her unable to control a crime scene filled with suspects and
their friends. When she repeated her request she was told everyone was in
a meeting. Why would police administration repeatedly refuse to provide
backup and FBI assistance in such circumstances?

Tom Wickman made another curious comment to Dr. McFarland and I, and
independently to Stephen Singular, author of "Presumed Guilty: An
Investigation into the JonBenet Ramsey Case, the Media, and the Culture
of
Pornography" (on page 217). Tom said that once he was "getting close" to
arresting a Boulder City Council member, but had been told to "back off."
Since Tom was legally prohibited from giving us any clues about the
Ramsey
investigation, I feel he was repeatedly drawing an analogy, by way of
saying that he'd heard the pedophile-coverup story before and had been
told to back off from investigating 

[CTRL] 4_Study of Waco-The Children

2000-06-05 Thread Bard



How much care did the FBI Hostage Rescue Team 
show for the numerous children that it knew were trapped in the Waco 
standoffbetween it and the adult Branch Davidians?

In her report "Beyond The Voice Of Reason," 
criminology professor Dr. Fran Haga writes that:

"Hope for some time was expressed that the 
children mighthave taken shelter in the buried school bus which hadbeen 
accessible through a trap door - at the morenorthern end of the building 
(see trap door marked onbody recovery diagram 4). However, shortly after 6 
AMApril 19, 1993, FBI Agent R.J. Craig's CEV had knockedthat end of the 
building from its foundation and hadburied in rubble the trapdoor leading to 
the buriedschool bus."

This is beyond dispute; Agent Craig testified 
during the House Waco hearings (as Dr. Haga relates):

"... to destroying stairwells and to following a 
plan toherd the Davidians to the center."

Thus, the FBI admitted to the use of armored 
vehicles against a flimsy building in full knowledge that many children were 
inside of it - all in an effort to "herd" the occupants to undestroyed parts of 
the building.

As Dr. Haga continues, the CEVs penetrated so 
far into the building - a building full of children - during this effort 
tosystematically destroy it in order to "herd" occupants to a part to be 
left standing - as to disappear into the building; the CEV at the front did so 
at least once, and it was intentional. 

She relates:

"The audio record which once existed of 
tapedcommunications between the vehicles and their commandposts 
indicated that the CEV making that frontal entrywas directed to crash into 
the concrete block room andknock it down. These directions were issued while 
theentry runs were underway, not prior to them as part ofany over all 
plan."

The "concrete block room" would later gain fame 
as "the bunker." 

http://www.alamanceind.com/nation/nation_6.html

Matt Maggio Editor  Publisher

--

BardPro Libertate - For 
FreedomBUCHANAN-Reformhttp://gopatgo2000.com/default.htmTo 
support Mr. Buchanan in the White Housewe must send to Congress 
Constitutional conservatives who will:
Restore the United States to "One 
Nation Under God" Return to Constitutional, Limited Government 
Protect the Inalienable Right to Life of All, including the Unborn and 
Infirm Protect Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms 
Restore National Sovereignty, including Withdrawal from the U.N. 
Maintain a Strong National Defense Repeal the 
Unconstitutional Income Tax Stop All Unconstitutional Spending 
Protect the Inalienable Rights of Liberty and Private Property 
Abolish the Federal Reserve and Restore Constitutional Money 
Promote Pro-family policies End Federal Subsidies for and 
Control of Education and Welfare Comprehensive Immigration Reform 
Return Control over Elections to the People Abolish Special 
Interest Entitlements (corporate welfare) 


[CTRL] 3_Study of Waco-The Bunker

2000-06-05 Thread Bard



"The concrete residue on the inside block walls 
are indicative of explosive activity within the room consistent with the charge 
that blew through the top of the room, from the outside in."-p. 15, "Beyond 
The Voice Of Reason," Dr. Fran Haga

Photos in Dr. Haga's report - along with such 
physical evidence she refers to in her report as "concrete residue" and 
a"round hole in the concrete top of the room roughly 28 to 30 inches in 
diameter" - make clear that the concrete-block room referred to by the 
"mainstream media" as "the bunker" was the target of an attack with high 
explosives during the siege at Mt. Carmel. 

The photo clearly shows the rebars in the hole 
bent down into the room; this means whatever explosion took place occurred 
outside - with the force of the blast going downward into the room. 


This evidence is not consistent with small-arms 
ammo cooking off during a fire; it is consistent only with the use of high 
explosives such as dynamite, TNT, or plastic explosives.

27 bodies were found in that "bunker" - six of 
which had gunshot wounds that would have been near-instantly fatal; at 
leasttwo of those six died before the fire - as indicated by autopsies not 
finding any trace of smoke or soot in their lungs, showing that they didn't live 
to breathe it and thus didn't commit suicide out of panic when they saw the 
building engulfed in flame.

http://www.alamanceind.com/nation/nation_5.html

BardPro Libertate - For 
FreedomBUCHANAN-Reformhttp://gopatgo2000.com/default.htm










[CTRL] start your own country

2000-06-05 Thread nessie

http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,36749,00.html

A Data Sanctuary is Born
by Declan McCullagh ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

5:00 p.m. Jun. 4, 2000 PDT
WASHINGTON -- A windswept gun tower anchored six miles off the stormy
coast of England is about to become the first Internet data haven.

A group of American cypherpunks has transformed the rusting fortress,
erected by the British military during World War II to shoot down Nazi
aircraft, into a satellite-linked virtual home for anyone looking for
a secure place to store sensitive or controversial data.

The founders of HavenCo, which will announce operations on Monday,
believe the concept will appeal to individuals and businesses looking
for a "safe haven" from governments around that world that are
becoming more and more interested in Internet regulation and taxation.

It's for "companies that want to have email servers in a location in
which they can consider their email private and not open to scrutiny
by anyone capable of filing a lawsuit," says Sean Hastings, the
32-year-old chief executive of HavenCo.

Hastings says that because a 1968 British court decision effectively
recognized the basketball court-sized island as a sovereign nation
called Sealand, HavenCo can provide more privacy and legal protections
then anyone else on the planet.

To create HavenCo -- which will offer Linux servers for $1,500 a month
-- the founders signed an agreement with Roy Bates, the quirky "crown
prince" of Sealand who landed on the abandoned platform in 1966 and
claimed it as an independent nation with its own currency, stamps, and
flag.

Bates, a former British Army major, has undertaken a string of failed
business ventures in an attempt make use of the world's tiniest
country -- a platform just 10 by 25 yards that perches atop two cement
caissons in the North Sea.

One plan was to build Sealand into a three-mile-long, man-made island
with an airport and banks. Another venture included working with
German investors to build a $70 million hotel and gambling complex --
a scheme that fell apart with the Germans taking over the fortress in
1978 and Bates regaining control in a dramatic helicopter raid at
dawn.

This time the elder Bates, now about 80 years old, is taking no
chances on his business partners: His son and royal heir-apparent,
Michael, is HavenCo's chief logistics officer and the royal family has
a seat on the board.

But today Sealand's potential adversaries include not merely a few
expansion-minded Germans, but nervous government officials who are
aggressively trying to pull the plug on unapproved offshore
activities.

During a Paris summit in May, for instance, representatives of the
Group of Eight (G8) nations met to hammer out an agreement on
international Net law. "The idea is to produce a global text so there
cannot be 'digital havens' or 'Internet havens' where anyone planning
some shady business could find the facilities to do it," French
Interior Minister Jean-Pierre Chevenement said at the time.

When Sealand was simply an eccentric's hobby, the British government
largely ignored the smallest country in the world. But if HavenCo
becomes a popular destination for gambling, money laundering, or other
socially disapproved activities, governments could move against it.

The Home Office in London could restrict the microwave links that
provide HavenCo with its lifeline to the outside world, and the
companies offering satellite connectivity could come under pressure
from regulators in their home countries. HavenCo could even find its
bank accounts imperiled.

For their part, HavenCo executives say they hope to avoid negative
publicity. "We don't intend to make anyone angry at us. We simply want
to provide online businesses a place with a sane set of rules that are
not constantly changing," Hastings said.

"If larger nations have a problem with unrestricted information flow,
then their problem is with the increase in information technology, and
not with us. They can't put the genie back in the bottle until every
individual on the planet has had their three wishes come true," he
said.

Somewhat ironically, bandits recently set up a fake "Principality of
Sealand" website to sell citizenship to unsuspecting visitors. Spanish
authorities reportedly are investigating a gang involved with drug
smuggling and arms trafficking using those passports.

In a bizarre incident, one "Sealand" passport of dubious origin
surfaced in connection with the July 1997 murder of fashion designer
Gianni Versace in Miami.

The British Embassy in Washington declined to comment on what would
prompt London to take action against the legitimate prince of Sealand.
"What it comes 

[CTRL] The Conspiracy to Balkanize BC...then the Domino Effect....

2000-06-05 Thread Franklin Wayne Poley

and maybe even Texas will be liberated!

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 12:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Labour Welfare Party [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BCPolitics] Pacific Island Nations...BC First Nation Support?

And what about Vancouver Island, Queen Charlottes etc. Aren't they part of
the Pacific Island Community of Nations? Seems to me these First Nations
would be willing to support a bid by First Nations in BC to enter the UN
General Assembly...especially if prominent Non-FN BC'ers like David Ingram
keep saying the whole province was STOLEN from FN's. BTW, what is Green
Party platform on FN Sovereignty?
EE/LWP

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 10:45:27 +1000
From: John Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Solomon Islands coup

From ABC News Online at http://www.abc.net.au/news/default.htm

Unconfirmed reports suggest Solomon Islands coup attempt

Reports are beginning to emerge of another possible coup attempt in the
Pacific, this time in the Solomon Islands.

Australian Foreign Affairs officials have heard similar reports, but are
still unable to confirm them.

However, callers to the ABC say a militia group called the Eagles [Malaita
Eagle Force] have put armed men on to the streets of the capital, Honiara.

The militia is also said to have taken the Prime Minister hostage, along
with an unspecified number of other people.

Where the hostages are being held and what the demands of their captors are
is not known at this stage.


For catalogs of online resources see:
Pacific Studies WWW Virtual Library
http://coombs.anu.edu.au/WWWVL-PacificStudies.html




NEWSALERT! $60 in FREE calls when you join beMANY! today.
http://click.egroups.com/1/4261/3/_/103697/_/960233193/


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE

2000-06-05 Thread Rory Winter



 From: "nessie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 English people seldom 
get abducted by greys according to a UK UFO mag.
  Maybe they taste bad.

Nessie's trolling again. Well, here's a 
thought:

Most nationalities don't get abducted by greys. Maybe the 
ones which do -notablyYanquis in comparatively large numbers- have some 
odd deviant quirk in their DNA makeup which interests the greys? Like indigenous 
American peoples (do many of them get abducted?) most of us do wonder about the  
mental equilibrium of los Yanquis. To us you lot ARE Aliens interested only in 
world domination.
 Perhaps the space aliens know UK cuisine 
sucks... ;-)

Average British cuisine  these days is more likely to be 
basedon frozen foods marketed by US corporations, BirdsEye, McDonalds, 
BurgerKing etc. We do eat a lot of hot East Indian cuisine these days. Maybe the 
Aliens can't handle that!

Rory.


[CTRL] Israeli Torture Unmasked Just A Bit (fwd)

2000-06-05 Thread Yardbird

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 15:55:04 +
From: MER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Israeli Torture Unmasked Just A Bit

   ___      __
  /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
 / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\ Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\   ISRAELI TORTURE
 http://www.MiddleEast.Org

  News, Information,  Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
 and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
  - - - - - - - - - -
 YOU ARE WHAT YOU KNOW AND WHAT YOU DO WITH WHAT YOU KNOW
 To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  THE ISRAELIS WANT EVERYONE TO FORGET

"How many drops of blood have been spilt
on our soil – and have not flowered?
Remember me."
19-year old woman prisoner at Khiam

MID-EAST REALITIES - www.MiddleEast.org - Washington - 6/5/00

For decades the Israelis have tortured Palestinians into submission.  Torture has
been one of Israel's dirty little secrets for quite some time; and they have perfected
it and given it all kinds of other names hoping to both confuse and sanitize it.
 "Shaking", "hooding", "standing"...the terms are all well-known to the experts.
 The bottom line is that torture has been one of the most common means by which
the Israelis have neutralized and demoralized the Palestinians; and nearly every
Palestinian home has a story of someone in their family or among their friends who
has directly suffered at these sadistic Israeli practices.

In southern Lebanon torture was also among the means used to perpetuate that occupation
by the Israelis and their surrogate SLA.

The invasion of Lebanon, the occupation that lasted a generation, the tens of thousands
of dead Lebanese, the blood-curdling massacres at Shatilla and Sabra and Qana, and
the torturing of thousands -- these are not going to be so easily forgotten as the
Israelis suggest.  The hatred and bitterness created by Israel still has many prices
that are likely to be exacted in the years ahead.

This article by Robert Fisk who recently visited the notorious Khiam Prison in Southern
Lebanon shortly after the Israelis fled tells a small but important part of the
overall story.


INSIDE A TORTURERS' DEN,
 MANACLES LIE ABANDONED
   By Robert Fisk at Khiam Jail

  "This place should be kept forever
   as a witness to our history."

THE INDEPENDENT, 25 May:
The torturers had just left but the horror remained. There was the whipping pole
and the window grilles where prisoners were tied naked for days, freezing water
thrown over them at  night. Then there were the electric leads for the little dynamo
– the machine mercifully taken off to Israel by the interrogators – which had the
inmates shrieking with pain when the electrodes touched their fingers or penises.
And there were the handcuffs which an ex-prisoner handed to me yesterday afternoon.

Engraved into the steel were the words: "The Peerless Handcuff Co. Springfield,
Mass. Made in USA." And I wondered, in Israel's most shameful prison, if the executives
over in Springfield knew what they were doing when they sold these manacles.

They were used over years to bind the arms of prisoners before interrogation. And
they wore them, day and night, as they were kicked – kicked so badly in Sulieman
Ramadan's case that they later had to amputate his arm.  Another prisoner was so
badly beaten, he lost the use of a leg. I found his crutch in Khiam prison yesterday,
along with piles of Red Cross letters from prisoners – letters which the guards
from Israel's  now-defunct "South Lebanon Army" militia never bothered to forward.

What is it that makes men do things like this? The prisoners – thousands of them
over the two decades of Khiam'sexistence – included guerrillas, relatives of gunmen,
civiliansby the dozen whose crimewas innocence, who would not collaborate with the
Israelis or the SLA, who refused to join the murderous little militia, who declined
to give the Israelis information about the Lebanese army.

"I was hung here naked for 13 days," Abdullah Attiyeh told me as we walked along
a dirty passage way beside the wall of the old French mandate fort. "They put a
bag on my head and threw cold water over me night and day."

The hoods were still there, big light-blue corduroy sacks with towels inside – some
of the towels bought from Norwegian Unifil soldiers because the UN globe was 
embroidered
on some of them – and so was the wire with which other prisoners, including women,
were beaten. Big, thick wire bound in blue plastic. The torturers were sadistic,
often stupid men. There were pornographic magazines and cheap comics and puzzle
books in their filthy quarters. Israel has admitted 

Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE

2000-06-05 Thread Eagle 1



LOL... Rory,

Butit's been claimed thru the ET 
grape-vine that ET's prefer those who do not smoke and that ET's prefer those 
who drink a steady intake of diet soda's... 
It's claimed that the meat is 
sweeter... making the victim a delicacy...
(and tastes much like barbacoa, the cheek 
meat of a cow)... 

However, it is reported that nicotine 
residue causes severe allergic reactions in ET's and even death. ET Rumor Central has it that 
thisisthe true reasons behind the massive campaigns against 
smoking... is not just the cancer thing and health issue with regards to 
smoking; and is also why the information about nutri-sweet and aspartame 
being detrimental to your health, (i.e. causesbrain tumors and 
alzheimer's, etc.),  is pooh-pooh'd... 
These marketing rumors are started and 
maintained for the sole reasonso that
the ET's harvesting of food resources for the 
future... are preserved, 
not to mentionhaving viable research 
victims.

SO... there's some more food for UFO 
thought... 
Therefore, no matter the nationality 
or DNA composition...
IF you don't smoke and especially if you drink 
lots of diet sodas, chances are increased by 100% that you will, at 
some time in this life or the life hereafter, be abductedand/or 
regardless of being abducted, if you don't smoke and you do drink lots of 
diet sodas, you are better suited for mind control purposes. 

 snicker, snicker 



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rory Winter 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 2:35 PM
  Subject: Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE
  
   From: "nessie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   English people seldom 
  get abducted by greys according to a UK UFO mag.
Maybe they taste bad.
  
  Nessie's trolling again. Well, here's a 
  thought:
  
  Most nationalities don't get abducted by greys. Maybe 
  the ones which do -notablyYanquis in comparatively large numbers- have 
  some odd deviant quirk in their DNA makeup which interests the greys? Like 
  indigenous American peoples (do many of them get abducted?) most of us do 
  wonder about the mental equilibrium of los Yanquis. To us you lot ARE Aliens 
  interested only in world domination.
   Perhaps the space aliens know UK cuisine 
  sucks... ;-)
  
  Average British cuisine these days is more likely to be 
  basedon frozen foods marketed by US corporations, BirdsEye, McDonalds, 
  BurgerKing etc. We do eat a lot of hot East Indian cuisine these days. Maybe 
  the Aliens can't handle that!
  
  Rory.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  .


Re: [CTRL] Clinton tells int'l terrorists: Attack these major U.S . cities- then martial law

2000-06-05 Thread Stopforth, Jamie

 Didn't they hand out gas masks during WWII and also teach what to do in
case of a bomb attack?  And now with all this stuff about, "not only is it
possible, but it's probable." (William Cohen speaking of terrorists attacks)
You'd think they'd be doing the same thing...

Jamie




(sent to USCMike1's 39,615+ readers - please repost to your own mailing
lists
and newsgroups - Thanks).

Dear Citizens, Patriots, Veterans, et al:

 Here is the list of 120 major U.S. cities that Clinton has told
international terroists to attack.  He has repeatedly broadcast, publicized,
and advertised this list to the world for the past four years that I have
been intimately involved with exposing the New World Order, its proponents,
its plans, and its present accomplishments.

 During this time I have attempted to obtain the specialized training
from the federal and local agencies necessary to avoid, recognize,
decontaminate, and medically treat exposure to NBC = Nuclear, Biological,
and
Chemical warfare and weapons of mass destruction as to be perpetrate by
international and/or domestic "terrorists."

 But, they refuse to allow any CIVILIAN to receive the training.  ONLY
the feds and certain state, county, city and local government agencies,
including medical centers and law enforcement agencies have been allow to
receive the training to protect themselves, the government employees and of
course the politicians.

 It is governmentally forbidden (already in certain cities and states)
for civilians to learn how to protect themselves from ANY type of physical
attack, NBC attack, or conventional warfare attack as from guns, ammunition,
and other implements of war - including would you believe it, protective gas
masks.  The government officials say that gas masks are considered to be
implements of war and therefore CIVILIANS are forbidden from obtaining,
possessing, or using them.

 Why?  Very simple.  We CIVILIANS are the intended targets.  Notice that
NO government officials nor agencies are advertised to be the targets.  Why?
This is all part of the plan for the New World Order rich, elite, illuminati
genocide mongers to depopulate the earth.  They want the present 6 billion
people population to be reduced to 500 million or even to 200 million.  This
is so the 300 elites, with their one million population families and
protectors (the top 1/2%) can have the entire world with its natural
resources naturally renewed over time all to themselves -

 -and of course the remainder of the population will be the totally
oblivious scientific automatons and engineers along with 199 million
chemically lobotomized imbecilic work slaves to feed, clothe, bathe, pamper,
care for, be sex objects for, and modern-day entertainment gladiators for
the
Luciferian elites.

 I have sent this post out dozens of times but it seems that now many
more people are beginning to wake up and shake off the shackles of
SHEEPLE-hood and they are genuinely interested in the FACTS of and the plans
of the New World Order.  So below I have copied the list of 120 major U.S.
cities that Clinton has determined that he wants terrorists to attack.

  However, throughout his entire presidential career, Clinton has NEVER
been able to coax, entice, prod, or cause ANY international or domestic
terrorists to attack the U.S.  All of the supposed international and/or
domestic terrorists that the feds have lied to us about attempting to commit
acts of terrorism have turned out to be U.S. military and federal MK-Ultra
Mind Contol subjects or U.S. paid mercenary terrorists under orders directly
from the feds and indirectly from Clinton himself.

Thanks to JOE [EMAIL PROTECTED] for asking for the list of cities and to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas Walker) for making it available.  Anyone can
visit
the U.S. Army Chemical and Biological Warfare web sites and get the same
information but the last time I tried all of the sites were locked as off
limits to civilians.

 If you are interested in how far away from these cities you should be
and in which directions please don't hesitate to contact either me or Doug
Walker.  OBTW, Doug and a few other Patriots have established safe areas in
the north western section of the state of New Mexico to avoid the NBC
attacks.

Best regards, USCMike

Subj:   CITIES FOR ATTACK
Date:   6/4/00 8:04:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From:   A HREF="mailto:JOE HOYLE"JOE HOYLE/A
To: A HREF="mailto:USCMike1"USCMike1/A

HELLO

I would like a copy of the 120 or so cities named as being vulnerable for a
possible NBC attack. Thanks for your time.
BYE - joe.(((   '   }

Subj:[Fwd: Targeted U.S. Cities]
Date:   2/2/99 12:12:27 PM Pacific Standard Time
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas Walker)
Reply-to:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Johnson)

This attached list will surprise some, but the many people
that I worked with in the past informed me of a different
pattern.

Since (we will not mention here) 

Re: [CTRL] The Conspiracy to Balkanize BC...then the Domino Effect....

2000-06-05 Thread Kris Millegan


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Background checks stopped more than 200,000 gun buys last year

2000-06-05 Thread Eagle 1




Could this mean thatthe system IS working?
http://www.trib.com/HOMENEWS/WASH/GunChecks.html

Background checks stopped more than 200,000 gun buys last year By 
MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN 
Associated Press Writer 
WASHINGTON (AP) - Background checks blocked 204,000 of the more than 8.6 
million prospective gun sales last year, according to a Justice Department 
report that shows state and local police rejected a higher percentage of 
would-be gun buyers than the FBI. 
The 1999 figures brought the number of purchase rejections since the Brady 
Act instituted background checks in February 1994 to 536,000 out of almost 22.3 
million applications, the department's Bureau of Justice Statistics reported. 
That confirmed earlier estimates of more than 500,000 rejections. 
The bureau's report provided the first hard numbers on the differences 
between checks by state and local police and those by the FBI. 
The FBI performed 4.5 million of the 8.6 million last year, compared with 4.1 
million by state and local agencies. 
The rejection rate among state and local agencies was 3 
percent, compared with 1.8 percent for the FBI. 
The report attributed this difference to state agencies' access to more 
detailed criminal history records than the FBI's. In 1999, 73 percent of 
rejections were because would-be buyers had been convicted of or indicted on 
felony charges. 
Last year, the report said, all state agencies had access to "computer 
databases that record past felony convictions, and many accessed databases with 
other disqualifying information such as fugitive status, court restraining 
orders, mental illness and domestic violence misdemeanor convictions." 
The Clinton administration long has argued that the states are better 
equipped than the FBI to do background checks, but some states have not wanted 
to pay the costs. Twenty-six states handle some or all their checks. 
The overall national rejection rate has remained 2.4 percent since 1994, 
despite the Nov. 30, 1998, switch to computerized instant checks and the 
addition then of checks on long-gun purchasers. Only handgun buyers were checked 
before. 
A second statistics bureau report largely recapped data already released by 
the Justice Department during its debate with the National Rifle Association 
over gun controls during the past few months. 
The gun owners' group opposed President Clinton's gun control proposals and 
argued federal prosecutors were not enforcing existing gun laws. The 
administration said federal prosecutors were focusing on serious offenders and 
shifting smaller cases to state and local prosecutors and that combined gun 
prosecutions were up. 
The report said preliminary 1999 data showed 6,728 defendants were charged 
with federal firearms offenses, up from 6,287 in 1998. It also showed that 
between 1992 and 1997 the number of federal firearms defendants decreased 19 
percent, from 7,621 to 5,993. 
The report attributed part of this decline to the Supreme Court's 1995 Bailey 
vs. United States decision limiting prosecutors' ability to charge defendants 
with using a firearm during a violent or drug offense. It estimated that 2,500 
more defendants would have been charged with illegal gun possession between 1995 
and 1998 if the court had ruled differently. 
The bureau said prosecutors compensated by seeking longer sentences for 
weapon use. 
In a statement, Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder said that since 1992, 
combined state and federal gun prosecutions grew by more than 22 percent. When 
final data are assembled, "the number of people charged with federal gun crimes 
in 1999 should be equal to the number of people charged in 1992, even though 
there has been a dramatic drop in gun crimes during that period," Holder said. 
He also noted that the number of federal firearms offenders sentenced to more 
than five years in prison is up more than 41 percent, and the average sentence 
rose by almost two years between 1992 and 1998.

http://www.crayon.net/read.cgi?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
++



Re: [CTRL] Reno's girlfriend

2000-06-05 Thread Nurev Ind Research

Who cares. As long as I don't have to screw her, I don't care who does.
Jealous Bard?

J2

 Bard wrote:

 It didn't take more than a few hours for an Internet appeal
 for information on Janet Reno's "past" to produce results.
 According to multiple sources - one of whom used to work in
 the court system in Miami - Reno's "girlfriend" was Ann Bishop, a
 Miami television anchorwoman at WPLG-TV.
 Reno and Bishop had a long-term relationship. Courthouse
 sources frequently saw them at parties together. It was the
 standing joke of the district attorney's office at the time Reno
 headed it - and the standing joke around Miami.
 Bishop was about Reno's age - and died of cancer Nov. 14, 1997
 at age 66.
 Soon after, a lawsuit was filed, challenging Bishop's will -
 which left her entire $1.8 million estate to two other women
 "friends."
 Bishop was also a close friend of Sister Jeanne O'Laughlin,
 the nun who is also a close friend of Reno's - who Reno tried to
 have mediate the Elian Gonzalez dispute.
 http://www.alamanceind.com/nation/nation_27.html

 Bard
 Pro Libertate - For Freedom
 BUCHANAN-Reform
 http://gopatgo2000.com/default.htm
 To support Mr. Buchanan in the White House
 we must send to Congress Constitutional conservatives who will:

  Restore the United States to "One Nation Under God"
  Return to Constitutional, Limited Government
  Protect the Inalienable Right to Life of All, including the Unborn and Infirm
   Protect Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms
  Restore National Sovereignty, including Withdrawal from the U.N.
  Maintain a Strong National Defense
  Repeal the Unconstitutional Income Tax
  Stop All Unconstitutional Spending
  Protect the Inalienable Rights of Liberty and Private Property
  Abolish the Federal Reserve and Restore Constitutional Money
  Promote Pro-family policies
  End Federal Subsidies for and Control of Education and Welfare
  Comprehensive Immigration Reform
  Return Control over Elections to the People
  Abolish Special Interest Entitlements (corporate welfare)

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] WHAT IN THE WORLD CAN HE DO NEXT

2000-06-05 Thread Ronald L. Wilson








BY
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

A
PROCLAMATION 

Gay
and lesbian Americans have made important and lasting contributions to our
Nation in every field of endeavor. Too often, however, gays and lesbians face
prejudice and discrimina-tion; too many have had to hide or deny their sexual
orientation in order to keep their jobs or to live safely in their communities.


In
recent years, we have made some progress righting these wrongs. Since the
Stonewall uprising in New York City more than 30 years ago, the gay and lesbian
rights movement has united gays and lesbians, their families and friends, and
all those committed to justice and equality in a crusade to outlaw
discriminatory laws and practices and to protect gays and lesbians from
prejudice and persecution. 

I
am proud of the part that my Administration has played to achieve these goals.
Today, more openly gay and lesbian individuals serve in senior posts throughout
the Federal Government than during any other Administration. To build on our
progress, in 1998 I issued an Executive Order to prohibit discrimination in the
Federal civilian workforce based on sexual orientation, and my Administration
continues to fight for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would
outlaw discrimination in the workplace based on sexual orientation. 

Yet
many challenges still lie before us. As we have learned from recent tragedies,
prejudice against gays and lesbians can still erupt into acts of hatred and
violence. I continue to call upon the Congress to pass meaningful hate crimes
legislation to strengthen the Department of Justice's ability to prosecute hate
crimes committed due to the victims sexual orientation. 

With
each passing year the American people become more receptive to diversity and
more open to those who are different from themselves. Our Nation is at last
realizing that gays and lesbians must no longer be strangers among
friends, as the civil rights pioneer David Mixner once noted. Rather, we must
finally recognize these Americans for what they are: our colleagues and
neighbors, daughters and sons, sisters and brothers, friends and partners. This
June, recognizing the joys and sorrows that the gay and lesbian movement has
witnessed and the work that remains to be done, we observe Gay and Lesbian
Pride Month and celebrate the progress we have made in creating a society more
inclusive and accepting of gays and lesbians. I hope that in this new
millennium we will continue to break down the walls of fear and prejudice and
work to build a bridge to understanding and tolerance, until gays and lesbians
are afforded the same rights and responsibilities as all Americans. 

NOW,
THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, by
virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United
States, do hereby proclaim June 2000 as Gay and Lesbian Pride Month. I
encourage all Americans to observe this month with appropriate programs,
ceremonies, and activities that celebrate our diversity and recognize the gay
and lesbian Americans whose many and varied contributions have enriched our
national life. 

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day of June, in the
year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of
America the two hundred and twenty-fourth. 

WILLIAM
J. CLINTON 
















6/5/00  Document2  1








Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread Nurev Ind Research

Aleisha Saba wrote:

 Nessie:   Either we run this government or this government runs us.   Is
 there anything more obnoxious or disgusting than a Civil SERVANT with a
 little bit of power, power mind you, not necessarily authority.

 Some of these people are so stupid they had to lower testing scores for
 them to get one foot in he door, and these are the most dangerous types.

This is a comforting myth. The governing elites are very intelligent. They
are generally much smarter than the population they govern. There are
exceptions.

Ronald Reagan was an idiot.
George Bush Sr. Barely broke the surface, and Shrub is even dumber than Reagan.
I was told by someone who worked with Gore that he was intelligent, but I just
don't see it.


 Frankly I prefer the old order, when men were gentlemen and served their
 country and cherished the Constitution.

Really? Where was this? Not in THIS country.


 So, these people are without authority and as far as I know as a
 conspiracy theorist, the only person I ever heard of who demanded this
 World Court was the Charles Manson family.

 Figure that one for this is a return to the 60 period, only it did not
 work then, and it will not work now.   This group wants a Civil War in
 order to call for Martial Law.

 Think they will find out that people are not like sheep; they might take
 a lot and remain silent as they put their families first.   But, once
 you tread upon the toes of the wrong people, well look at Clinton - he
 cannot go out the front door without 800 armed SS men, 20 black
 heliocopters, and an entourage long enough to be mistaken for a funeral
 procession.

 We have one thing which our forefathers gave to us and it cannot be
 changed without a vote - and that is the right to vote.

Your vote is worthless. It was one of the first things to go.

 These people are so insane they live in a world of their own, for it was
 none of my making.

This is true.


 If we are luckey, the ET's will get them first.

Not quite. If we're lucky the ET's will get the ET sensitives first so they
will quit being a distraction from serious matters.

Joshua2

 A. Saba
 Dare To Call It Conspiracy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Bilderberg-participants, year 2000 in Belgium

2000-06-05 Thread Nurev Ind Research

DIG alfred webre wrote:

 The usual demonology of global mind control  exploitation is in attendance
 at this years' Bilderbergers - from Henry Kissinger to David Rockefeller.
 The remark has been made that Bilderbergers are like "high=level employees".

Stupid and presumptive remark. Why should they be anyone's employees? Why
can't they just be what they are. The supreme planning group of the world's
rich elite.

 Their principals are elsewhere. The question is, then: Who are the
 Bilderbergers' employers?

I am.

Joshua2

 Alfred Webre, Vancouver, BC
 =
 Bilderberg-participants, year 2000 in Belgium
 Bilderberg Press Release extract: 3 June 2000

 The 48th Bilderberg meeting was held in Brussels, Belgium, 1-3 June 2000.
 Among other subjects the Conference discussed US Elections, Globalisation,
 New Economy, the Balkans, EU Enlargement, the European Far Right.
 Approximately 100 participants from North America and Europe attended
 the discussions. The meeting was private in order to encourage frank
 and open discussion. etc.

 Bilderberg meetings, Brussels, Belgium, 1-3 June 2000
 List of Participants, 3 June 2000

 Honorary Secretary General:

 J. Martin Taylor, Chairman, WH Smith Group, Adviser, Goldman Sachs

 Honorary Chairman:

 Etienne Davignon, Chairman, Société Générale de Belgique

 Agnelli, Giovanni, I, Fiat

 Agnelli, Umberto, I, IFIL

 Aguirre y Gil de Biedma, Esperenza, E, Pres. Spanish Senate

 Allaire, Paul, USA, Chair, Xerox

 Ambrosetti, Alfredo, I, Ambrosetti Group

 Andersen, Bodil Nyboe, DK, Governor, Central Bank of Denmark

 Asper, Israel, CDN, Chair, CanWest

 Avery, Graham, INT, Chief Adviser for Enlargement, EC

 Balsemão, Francisco Pinto, P, Uni, Lisbon, Impressa

 Barnevik, Percy, S, Investor AB

 Benschop, Dick, NL, State Secretary for European Affairs

 Bernabè, Franco, I, Italian rep on Balkan reconstruction

 Betz, Hans-Georg, Columbia  NY Unis.

 Bildt, Carl, INT, UN (Balkans)

 Black, Conrad, CDN, Chair, Telegraph Group

 Bruton, John, IRL, Leader, Fine Gael

 Buchanan, Robin WT, GB, Bain  Co

 Clarke, Kenneth, GB, MP

 Çolakoglu, Nuri, TR, NTV

 Collomb, Bertrand, Lafarge

 Cromme, Gerhard, D, Thyssen/Krupp

 David, George A, GR, Hellenic Bottling

 Deutch, John M, MIT

 Diamandouros, P Nikiforos, GR, Ombudsman

 Dodd, Christopher J, USA, Senator, D, Connecticut

 Donilon, Thomas E, USA, FannieMae

 Dyson, Esther, USA, EDventure

 Fréchette, Louise, INT, UN

 Fresco, Paolo, I, Fiat

 Frum, David, CDN, National Post

 Gouveia, Teresa Patrício, P, MP (PSD)

 Graham, Donald E, USA, Washington Post

 Hagel, Chuck, USA, Senator, R, Nebraska

 Halberstadt, Victor, NL, Leiden Univ.

 Hambro, Christian, N, Research Council of Norway

 Hampel, Erich, A, Creditanstalt-Bankverein

 Hutchison, Kay bailey, USA, Senator, R, Texas

 Huyghebaert, Jan, B, Almanij NV

 Janssen, Daniel E, B, Solvay

 Johansson, Leif, S, Volvo

 Johnson, James A, USA, Johnson Capital

 Jordan Jr, Vernon E, USA, Lazard Frères

 Kayhan, Muharrem, TR, Söktas

 Kissinger, Henry A, USA, Kissinger Associates

 Kopper, Hilmar, D, Deutsche Bank

 Kravis, Henry R, USA, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts

 Kravis, Marie-Josée, USA, Hudson Institute

 Lamy, Pascal, INT, European Commissioner

 Lévy-Lang, André, F, Former Chair Paribas

 Lippens, Maurice, B, Fortis

 Lipponen, Paavo, FIN, Prime Minister

 Mathews, Jessica T, USA, Carnegie Endowment

 McDonough, William J, USA, Pres. Federal Reserve Bank of NY

 Montbrial, Thierry de, F, French Inst of International Relations

 Moore, Mike, INT, WTO

 Nass, Matthias, D, Die Zeit

 Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands

 Ollila, Jorma, FIN, Nokia

 Padoa-Schioppa, tommaso, INT, ECB

 Pagrotsky, Leif, S, Trade Minister

 Papandreou, George A, GR, Foreign Minister

 Petersson, Lars Eric, S, Skandia

 Petritsch, Wolfgang, A, High Rep, Bosnia; EU negotiator Kosovo

 Pury, David de, CH, de Pury Pictet Turrettini

 Rasmussen, Anders Fogh, DK, Liberal Party

 Reiten, Eivind, N, Norsk Hydro

 Richardson, Bill, USA, Energy Secretary

 Riotta, Gianni, I, La Stampa

 Rockefeller, David, USA, Chase Manhattan Bank

 Rodriguez Inciarte, Matías, E, BSCH

 Roll, Eric, GB, UBS Warburg

 Ruggiero, Renato, I, Schroder Salomon Smith Barney

 Scholten, Rudolf, A, Österreichische Kontrollbank

 Schoutheete de Tervarent, Ph de, B, Former EU Perm Rep

 Seidenfaden, Tøger, DK, Politiken

 Solana Madariaga, Javier, INT, Sec Gen, Council of the EU

 Soros, George, USA, Soros Fund Management

 Steinberg, James B, USA, Dep Asst to the President for National Security
 Affairs

 Strauss-Kahn, Dominique, F, Univ. of Paris, Fomer Finance Minister

 Surroi, Veton, Kosovo, Publisher, KOHA Ditore

 Sutherland, Peter D, IRL, Goldman Sachs  BP Amoco

 Tarullo, Daniel K, USA, Georgetowm Univ.

 Thornton, John L, Goldman Sachs

 Tremonti, Giulio, I, Finance Commission, Chamber of Deputies

 Trichet, Jean-Claude, F, Banque de France

 Vasella, Daniel L, CH, Novartis

 Veer, Jeroen van der, NL, Shell

 Vink, Lodewijk JR 

Re: [CTRL] Bilderberg-participants, year 2000 in Belgium

2000-06-05 Thread Nurev Ind Research

"[to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:

 In a message dated 06/04/2000 6:04:53 PM Central Daylight Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  The question is, then: Who are the
  Bilderbergers' employers? 
 ###

 We know that there is no such thing as the Bilderbergers,
 because Rush Limbaugh has told us so. (Many times)
 There is also no such thing as the Council on Foreign Relations,
 or if there is, we can be sure it's innocent and harmless,
 because Rush Limbaugh has told us so.

 What's funny is that Limbaugh openly states on the air,
 "You don't have to think...I will think for you and I will tell
  you what's important."
 So the "Dittoheads" let Rush think for them.
 Hey...Rush says there is no such thing as a "Conspiracy"
 and that anybody who thinks they exist is a total whacko.
 This sounds just like Professor Jerry Mander doesn't it?

What are you referring to here? What did Mander say?

J2


 Notice Herr Henry Kissinger is once more in attendance at
 this meeting. (I think he's made about all of them)

 Let's not forget Kissinger's infamous quote from the
 Bilderberg Meeting in Evian France several years ago:
"Today the people of Los Angeles would be outraged
  if U.N. troops were patrolling the streets of L.A.
  Tomorrow, they will be grateful."

  Regards to All
  Nakano

 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
 misdirections
 and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
 minor
 effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
 CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
 A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
  A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] study reveals continued reports of increased pain in dying hospitalized patients

2000-06-05 Thread Eagle 1



H?
Let me see... Why would family members be 
reporting a high incidence of pain in their dying loved ones? Could it be 
that THEY, the family member(s) are the only ones listening to the 
patient, while the doctors wink and tell the patient that the pain is not 
as bad as the patient claims, or that it is only in their mind? I 
certainly wonder... hm.
Could it also be that the government has put so 
many regulatory controls on narcotics that the doctors fear that they will lose 
their licenses if they are perceived as "over prescribing" pain medications or 
giving pain meds for illnesses that the government and insurance corporates have 
dictated are painless or less painful than the patient reports? 
H? Wonder what the problem is here? 

http://www.eurekalert.org/releases/ohsu-osr060500.html

 
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 5 JUNE 2000 
  Contact: Jim Newman[EMAIL PROTECTED]503-494-8231Oregon Health Sciences University 
  OHSU study reveals continued reports of increased pain in 
  dying hospitalized patients 
  Portland, Ore. -- A new study by researchers at Oregon Health Sciences 
  University notes continued reports of increased pain for dying, hospitalized 
  Oregonians in late 1998. The study, which is printed in this month's edition 
  of the Western Journal of Medicine, shows 54 percent of family members 
  reported their loved one had moderate or severe pain in the last week of life. 
  Previously gathered data shows a sharp increase in pain levels for dying 
  hospitalized patients. Complaints of high pain levels increased from 33 
  percent to 57 percent in late 1997. Susan Tolle, M.D., director of OHSU's 
  Center for Ethics in Health Care; Virginia Tilden, Ph.D., R.N., dean of 
  research in OHSU's School of Nursing; Susan Hickman, Ph.D., project director 
  at the Center for Ethics; and Anne Rosenfeld, Ph.D., assistant professor in 
  the School of Nursing, conducted both studies. 
  When combined, the studies identify a continued, sharp increase in family 
  reports of pain at the end of life for hospitalized patients. However, 
  researchers point out that neither study draws conclusions about cause and 
  effect. "We will never know why family members of hospitalized dying patients 
  reported higher rates of pain in late 1997, nor why they continued to report 
  higher rates of pain in late 1998," said Tilden, a co-author of the study. 
  "Late 1997 was a volatile time in Oregon's political and regulatory climate. 
  Events such as the legalization of physician-assisted suicide and an extensive 
  pre-ballot media campaign about end-of-life care were just a couple of the 
  things that were happening at the time." 
  Team members suggest possible explanations for increased reports of pain 
  include more family awareness about pain treatment options and a possible 
  change in physician prescribing practices due to fears of regulatory 
  sanctions. "On the one hand, families may have higher expectations about pain 
  management than they have in the past and may be reporting pain more 
  frequently," said Tolle, lead author of the study. "On the other hand, if 
  families are right that their loved ones did experience more pain, this raises 
  grave concerns. Were doctors writing less pain medication for these patients, 
  and if so, why?" 
  Both studies used similar methods to reach participating family members 
  through a random sampling of Oregon death certificates. Respondents were 
  contacted two to four months after the death of their loved one. If they 
  agreed to participate, they were interviewed by telephone. A total of 475 
  family members consented to take part in the initial study and 103 in the 
  follow-up study. "One challenge we faced in gathering this data was that 
  Oregon death certificates do not list contact information," said Hickman. "In 
  order to find family members, we had to search publicly available records, 
  such as obituaries. We were able to locate 51 percent of potential 
  respondents, and just over half of these family members agreed to 
  participate." The telephone interview included questions about advance 
  planning, pain management and communication issues. Only the question about 
  pain yielded changes over time, and this change was in hospitalized dying 
  patients only. The three main causes of death in hospitalized patients were 
  cancer, heart disease and cerebrovascular disease. 
  OHSU's Center for Ethics in Health Care has been tracking end-of-life care 
  markers for more than a decade. Until this study, the research suggested that 
  end-of-life care was improving in all areas. The markers of improvement 
  include: increased attention to advance planning, increased rates of hospice 
  referrals, increased physician and public education about end-of-life care 
  issues, decreased rates of in-hospital deaths, and decreased barriers to 
  prescribing narcotics. 
  The results of this study raise many questions, 

Re: [CTRL] Background checks stopped more than 200,000 gun buys lastyear

2000-06-05 Thread Rock4Life

No, I would not say that it is workingThese are basic stats, in
black and white...These would reflect all rejections for no matter what
reason. You could have an unpaid parking ticket and get kicked out and
not be able to purchase if that is what your local authorities decide to
look at. Some years back a girl I know wanted to purchase a handgun and
was rejected, and was told that she was being looked for also, to her
shock. What had happened was that there was another girl with the same
name running around that they were looking for and they(the authorities)
thought it was her trying to buy a gun. The girl then had to take her
DL, birth certificate and some other forms of ID and go to the sheriffs
office to get it all straightened out(massive red tape) before she was
allowed to purchase. Thats one case, and another is just as simpleA
local gun dealer that lives behind me went to sale a gun to someone he
already new or was related to and was told to send that person
immediately to them that he had some business he had to get straight,
that is, he was rejected, and had to see the authorities...story
isunpaid tickets...so he was refused the right to by a gun like a
criminal just because he had not paid his ticket yet. So I would think
that there are a lot of cases just like these out there but your
anti-gun crowd will cheer on these stats as gun control working at its
bestYou have to go a little deeper to get to the root cause of all
these rejections, to see just what it was  rejected for before grading
the scores..its an uphill battle my friendsRock4Life

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Background checks stopped more than 200,000 gun buys

2000-06-05 Thread Eagle 1

I have to disagree...  Rock4
It's working...  the system that is...  slow as it may be.
You speak of isolated incidences that do not occur on a grandiose scale of
the gun purchasing stats.  I know of people who can't even get a credit card
or purchase a home because of bogus information on their credit reports that
even attorneys can't seem to remove or resolve with these reporting
agencies...  And so what?
__IT happens.Computers are only as good as those who program them.  IF
the information about your friends is wrong,  it is a travesty,  but not a
tragedy.

I remain an avid anti-gun control person.  I believe that every law abiding
citizen who has an average IQ intelligence understands that a gun can kill.
But still I believe that the intelligent law abiding citizen is entitled to
own and possess a gun in this country.  Why?  Because responsible,
intelligent,  law abiding people do not commit murder.  And as I was taught
in the military,  don't aim a gun at anyone unless you aim to kill.  The
only reason I maintain a gun is to protect my family and my property against
the ignorant bastards who haven't got the average IQ of spit and don't seem
to have any value of other people's possessions or human life.

What good is gun control when only ignorant illiterate criminals have the
guns... ???
The idea is to eliminate THEM,  if they invade the privacy and rights of law
abiding citizens.  IF this should ever happen,  that the criminals are
eliminated,  there will be a lot of guns sitting in the closets collecting
dust.

THIS,  is true gun control.

eagle 1


- Original Message -
From: "Rock4Life" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Background checks stopped more than 200,000 gun buys
lastyear


 No, I would not say that it is workingThese are basic stats, in
 black and white...These would reflect all rejections for no matter what
 reason. You could have an unpaid parking ticket and get kicked out and
 not be able to purchase if that is what your local authorities decide to
 look at. Some years back a girl I know wanted to purchase a handgun and
 was rejected, and was told that she was being looked for also, to her
 shock. What had happened was that there was another girl with the same
 name running around that they were looking for and they(the authorities)
 thought it was her trying to buy a gun. The girl then had to take her
 DL, birth certificate and some other forms of ID and go to the sheriffs
 office to get it all straightened out(massive red tape) before she was
 allowed to purchase. Thats one case, and another is just as simpleA
 local gun dealer that lives behind me went to sale a gun to someone he
 already new or was related to and was told to send that person
 immediately to them that he had some business he had to get straight,
 that is, he was rejected, and had to see the authorities...story
 isunpaid tickets...so he was refused the right to by a gun like a
 criminal just because he had not paid his ticket yet. So I would think
 that there are a lot of cases just like these out there but your
 anti-gun crowd will cheer on these stats as gun control working at its
 bestYou have to go a little deeper to get to the root cause of all
 these rejections, to see just what it was  rejected for before grading
 the scores..its an uphill battle my friendsRock4Life







.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Employment at the Vertical Bar Motel

2000-06-05 Thread Alamaine

From  www.wsws.org

WSWS : News  Analysis : North America : The Brutal Society
Prisons: a booming industry in the US and Europe
By Joseph Delius
5 June 2000
Back to screen version

For some years now, within the economically advanced countries two parallel
developments have been proceeding at an increasing pace, and in reverse
proportion to each other: the dismantling of social welfare systems and the
expansion of the prison system. The customary justification for the billions of
dollars being spent on the construction of new prisons, increases in the scope
and severity of criminal justice and the introduction of new forms of
punishment is that all this "serves to protect the public from violent crime".

Yet most crime statistics show conclusively that the violent crime rate has
declined, or at least stagnated, over the past few years. As opposed to this,
the number of prison inmates who committed offences in no way violent, but
intrinsically linked to poverty and social inequality, has increased
dramatically. Government plans and "prison reforms" are all based on the
assumption that this development will continue at an even greater pace and
become a permanent feature of society. Thus, preparations are being made to
accommodate a growing percentage of the population that will, at least
temporarily, find itself behind prison bars.

This process is becoming more and more apparent in Europe. For instance, in
Germany 2.5 billion marks ($US1.25 billion) have just been allocated for the
expansion of the prison system, for construction work alone (i.e., not
including overhead, administrative, personnel or other operational costs). The
objective is to increase prison capacity by up to 50 percent in the eastern
German states, and by about 25 percent in several of the western German states.
The same trend is evident in other European countries as well, particularly in
Britain where current planning will require the construction of at least two
dozen new prisons over the next 10 years. In France the Minister of Justice
recently announced that seven new prisons will be built, and five of the
largest existing prisons modernized at a total construction cost of 5.5 billion
francs ($US800 million).

Noteworthy as these figures are, the growth of the prison systems in Europe is
still far behind that of the "world leader" in incarceration, the United
States, where approximately two million people are now in prison. In other
words, a country whose population makes up only 5 percent of the world's
population now accounts for one quarter of all prison inmates worldwide. The
prison population of the US has increased by 61 percent over the past 10 years,
and is still growing.

Some US states are already spending considerably more on their prison systems
than on higher education. California has the highest incarceration rate in the
world with over 626 prison inmates per 100,000 state residents. (By comparison,
the incarceration rate in Indonesia is 21 per 100,000 inhabitants; Germany, 81;
France, 84; and Britain, 94). Recent official statistics and independent
studies show that California spends a total of roughly $5.6 billion dollars per
year (all costs included) on its prison system, but only $4.3 billion on its
schools and universities.

Not that this ominous "model" has damped the fervor with which European
governments and established parties are pursuing their "get tough on crime"
policies. On the contrary: The competition for recognition as the harshest
propagator of repressive criminal law is being fought out among them with the
same intensity as their vying for acclaim as the best representative of big
business interests.

Crime and society

In an article published May 4 in the German daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung,
journalist Heribert Prantl asked Christian Pfeiffer, the director of the KFN (
Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachsen) crime research institute,
what he saw as the underlying reasons for the expansion of the prison system in
Germany. Pfeiffer's conclusions are in striking contrast to official
justifications.

The criminologist stated that the increase in the number of prison inmates had
nothing to do with an increase in crime, but was rather a result of changes in
criminal law practice. He pointed out four essential aspects of this: To begin
with, the law courts had taken a much tougher approach in the second half of
the 1990s. Secondly, more and more people were being incarcerated because they
were not able to pay fines. This was due to the fact that courts were taking
less and less account of people's financial situation, sending out court orders
after the most superficial inquiries, instead of arranging for oral hearings to
establish offenders' personal circumstances.

The judicial system is truly blind in this respect, said Pfeiffer, only
noticing when it's too late that "they've ordered an unemployed person to pay a
four thousand mark fine". The third aspect Pfeiffer sees is that not only is

Re: [CTRL] Background checks stopped more than 200,000 gun buys last year

2000-06-05 Thread M.A. Johnson

Eagle 1

Could this mean that the system IS working?

MJ
No.
There is absolutely no possible method for determining whether
or not this Constitutional violation stopped or prohibited *any*
person from obtaining a gun.  It might have prevented a person
from purchasing a gun at a 'background' check outlet ...

Alternately, why have these 200,000 violators not been
persecuted (intended)?

Regard$,
--MJ

Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those
who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for
the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent
homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater
confidence than an armed one.
  -- Thomas Jefferson quoting Cesare Beccaria,
Criminologist 1764 (1743-1826)

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Prince Charles- Talking Out Of Class?

2000-06-05 Thread William Shannon

The Prince of Darkness


By Dr. Gilbert Ross


Continuing an almost five-century old British tradition of mixing Church and
State, the Prince of Wales has again tried to reverse the tide of scientific
inquiry and exploration—a move many will equate with King Canute's futile
attempt to hold back the ocean tides 1,000 or so years ago.

In a radio address last week, Prince Charles called for a return to
spirituality as a guiding philosophy for human endeavors, with an associated
downplaying of technology and science. He warned of the dangers of
unrestrained scientific research and the perils of "tampering" with nature.
He was inspired to pen these thoughts during a recent pilgrimage to a remote
Greek monastery.

Besides calling for a restoration of the "essential unity" between the living
and the spiritual world, he attacked old bugaboos of his, biotechnology
(genetic modification, GM) and GM food. He decided to ignore the fact that
both his own government, as well as the leader of the Roman Catholic Church,
Pope John Paul ll, have come out in support of this technology as a potential
means to help alleviate malnutrition and starvation in the developing world.
The British population has taken his warnings, as well as those of other
environmental extremists, more seriously than scientists or the American
public—GM food is shunned throughout the U.K. and many areas of Europe. But
they still benefit from drugs produced through the same methods—no one has
yet called for the removal of biopharmaceuticals such as insulin, and many
other GM-drugs.

In his speech, he supported the "precautionary principle," which advocates
the elimination of any substance or technique which cannot be proven to be
absolutely safe. However, it is well known scientifically that proving
something 100% safe is often impossible, and essentially meaningless anyway.
Is driving completely safe? Are medications completely safe? Of course
not—even crossing the street can be dangerous, yet we go about our daily
activities anyway. If hundreds, or thousands, of useful products were banned
because proving them "safe" would be impossible, take years, or be too
expensive, what would replace them?

By calling "excessive" scientific rationalism an affront to "the creator,"
and stating that science should be used to "understand how nature works, but
not to change what it is," he seemed to be calling for a reversal of all the
accomplishments of mankind, dating backwho knows how far? He assumes that
there must be an inherent conflict between spirituality and science—never
mind that scientific discoveries and technical innovations have made our
lives so much better, both in quality and quantity, over the centuries.
Thanks to these discoveries, those of us in the developed world are no longer
at the whim of a fickle nature, hoping for adequate rain, sun, etc., to eke
out a subsistence living.

These benefits are, unfortunately, still not commonplace in the poor areas of
Asia and Africa. Yet "environmentalists" in well-off areas, who have never
been hungry or coaxed a crop out of an unforgiving field, try to cut off new
methods that show great promise for easing their lives. They are against
science, and seem to be against humans in favor of forests. Yet their
favorite agricultural approach, "organic" farming, is so inefficient it would
force much more forest acreage into cultivation than using modern methods.

After reading the text of Prince Charles' speech, Dr. James Watson, Nobel
Prize winning co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, stated, "He is one of
the people who are worried that the world is moving too fast. But the world
is really rather wretched for a lot of people and science and technology can
improve their livesWe will be able to improve the quality of food."

These miracle will occur in any event, but they will be here sooner if
science is allowed to overcome fear and superstition in high places. It is as
foolish to try to turn back the hands of time, as it is to try to reverse the
tides.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 

Re: [CTRL] Fwd: There Goes the Ozone Layer

2000-06-05 Thread [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 06/04/2000 10:39:21 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Don't forget that the Antarctica volcano, Mt. Erebus, is a major
contributor of
 halogens to the Antarctic atmosphere.   In 1991 Mt. Erebus produced 14,600
tons of
 HCl and 6,600 tons of HF. 
##

Good information Richard.  Here's a fair comparison.
If we let 1 gallon of water represent the total amount of chlorine in all the
CFCs
ever produced by man, then all the chlorine released by the oceans and by
volcanoes over the last 200 years would be represented by the water in
Lake Michigan!   It is such a tiny amount in comparison to the chlorine
that is released by natural processes, as to be meaningless.

Consider that the Ozone Layer has continued to exist for millions of years
in spite of eras of high volcanic activity and in spite of the massive
quantities
of chlorine produced by the oceans.
Now we are supposed to believe that the CFCs in spraycans and in
air conditioners is "destroying the ozone".
It's totally laughable, once you know the facts.
Trouble is, most folks get their information and their opinions
from television.  If Dan Rather, and Brokaw, and Jennings say it,
then it must be true.  Even worse.if they don't say it,
then it can't be true.

 Regards to All
 Nakano

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] WHAT IN THE WORLD CAN HE DO NEXT

2000-06-05 Thread Foxter



Thank you for this. 
It's not happy news but it is the reality Klinton wants for 
us.



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Ronald L. Wilson 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:55 PM
  Subject: [CTRL] WHAT IN THE WORLD CAN HE 
  DO NEXT
  
  
  BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
  
  A PROCLAMATION 
  Gay and lesbian Americans have made important and 
  lasting contributions to our Nation in every field of endeavor. Too often, 
  however, gays and lesbians face prejudice and discrimina-tion; too many have 
  had to hide or deny their sexual orientation in order to keep their jobs or to 
  live safely in their communities. 
  In recent years, we have made some progress righting 
  these wrongs. Since the Stonewall uprising in New York City more than 30 years 
  ago, the gay and lesbian rights movement has united gays and lesbians, their 
  families and friends, and all those committed to justice and equality in a 
  crusade to outlaw discriminatory laws and practices and to protect gays and 
  lesbians from prejudice and persecution. 
  I am proud of the part that my Administration has 
  played to achieve these goals. Today, more openly gay and lesbian individuals 
  serve in senior posts throughout the Federal Government than during any other 
  Administration. To build on our progress, in 1998 I issued an Executive Order 
  to prohibit discrimination in the Federal civilian workforce based on sexual 
  orientation, and my Administration continues to fight for the Employment 
  Non-Discrimination Act, which would outlaw discrimination in the workplace 
  based on sexual orientation. 
  Yet many challenges still lie before us. As we have 
  learned from recent tragedies, prejudice against gays and lesbians can still 
  erupt into acts of hatred and violence. I continue to call upon the Congress 
  to pass meaningful hate crimes legislation to strengthen the Department of 
  Justice's ability to prosecute hate crimes committed due to the victims 
  sexual orientation. 
  With each passing year the American people become more 
  receptive to diversity and more open to those who are different from 
  themselves. Our Nation is at last realizing that gays and lesbians must no 
  longer be "strangers among friends," as the civil rights pioneer David Mixner 
  once noted. Rather, we must finally recognize these Americans for what they 
  are: our colleagues and neighbors, daughters and sons, sisters and brothers, 
  friends and partners. This June, recognizing the joys and sorrows that the gay 
  and lesbian movement has witnessed and the work that remains to be done, we 
  observe Gay and Lesbian Pride Month and celebrate the progress we have made in 
  creating a society more inclusive and accepting of gays and lesbians. I hope 
  that in this new millennium we will continue to break down the walls of fear 
  and prejudice and work to build a bridge to understanding and tolerance, until 
  gays and lesbians are afforded the same rights and responsibilities as all 
  Americans. 
  NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of 
  the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the 
  Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2000 as 
  Gay and Lesbian Pride Month. I encourage all Americans to observe this month 
  with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities that celebrate our 
  diversity and recognize the gay and lesbian Americans whose many and varied 
  contributions have enriched our national life. 
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
  second day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the 
  Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 
  twenty-fourth. 
  WILLIAM J. CLINTON 
  


Re: [CTRL] Employment at the Vertical Bar Motel

2000-06-05 Thread [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 06/05/2000 5:35:27 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 The ruthless dismantling of social welfare systems and the effects of
global
 capitalism have dramatically changed the lives of millions of people. Many
who
 previously just managed to get by on the fringes of the "social network" are
 now faced with destitution.
###

This is a pre-planned process.
This is a long-term process.
In brief, here is how it works.
For illustration, we'll use the United States starting in 1928.

1.  The total tax burden on the average middleclass family is 3%
 of annual income.  (Most families are single-income families).

2.  There are virtually no federally funded "social programs".
 There are very few state funded "social programs".

3.  Most adult Americans are highly self-suficient.
 Healthcare and dental care is affordable.
 Most families can afford to go to their family doctors
 and they can afford to go to the hospital.

4.  Most Americans can afford to save money.  The national savings rate
 is far higher than it will be 60 or 70 years later.

5.  A high percentage of Americans can afford to buy a home.
 The "owner occupancy rate" is far higher than it will be 60 years
 later when many people will live in apartment houses and other
 rental properties.

6.  Most Americans are relatively debt free (excluding home mortgages).

Then, in the 1930s, the Federal government comes forward with many new
"social programs".  The government launches programs which offer to help
people do the above listed things which they have traditionally done for
themselves.
These various programs begin at a modest level.
But as time passes and people get used to the idea of "social programs",
more and more such programs are added and expanded.
Of course the government must increase taxes to pay for all of this.
The people gripe about the taxes, but they have grown to embrace
the "free" federal programs.

Over a period of 2 generations the situation has changed dramatically.
In the year 1998:

1.  The total tax burden on the average middle-class family is over 50%
 of annual income. (Most families are now dual-income families).

2.  There are almost countless federally funded "social programs".
 There are many state funded "social programs".

3.  Most adult Americans are highly dependent on the government.
 Healthcare and dental care are not affordable.
 Most families can't afford to go to their family doctors
 and they can't afford to go to the hospital without expensive
 health and medical insurance coverage.

4.   Most Americans can't afford to save money.  The national savings rate
  is the lowest since records have been kept.

5.  A high percentage of Americans can't afford to buy a home.
 The "owner occupancy rate" is far lower than it was 50 years ago.

6.  Most Americans are in debt.  (Even when excluding home mortgages).


MOST  PEOPLE HAVE BECOME HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON
THE  FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.  ONE IN EVERY FOUR  PEOPLE
IS RECEIVING FUNDS FROM THE GOVERNMENT IN ONE FORM
OR ANOTHER.
ABOUT HALF THE SCHOOL CHILDREN IN THE COUNTRY ARE
GETTING "FREE"  OR REDUCED-PRICE SCHOOL LUNCHES WHICH
ARE GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED.
MILLIONS LIVE IN GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED HOUSING.

AT  THIS  POINT  THE TRAP  IS  SPRUNG!!!

NOW COMES  THE "RUTHLESS DISMANTLING OF

SOCIAL WELFARE  SYSTEMS."

BUT HERE IS THE REALLY CRUEL AND INSIDIOUS PART OF THE PLAN.

THE HIGH TAX STRUCTURE PUT INTO PLACE TO PAY FOR THESE

PROGRAMS  IS  KEPT  IN PLACE.

NOW  THE PEOPLE  ARE  TRAPPED.

THEY CAN'T AFFORD TO PAY FOR  ALL THE "FREE" THINGS

THE GOVERNMENT WAS PROVIDING FOR THEM BECAUSE

THEY ARE STILL PAYING HALF OF THEIR INCOME TO THE

GOVERNMENT.

NOW  THEY DON'T HAVE THEIR  MONEY TO PROVIDE FOR

THEMSELVESAND THEY DON'T HAVE THE "FREE"

GOVERNMENT  PROGRAMS  EITHER!!

THIS  PLAN  IS  MUCH  FURTHER  ADVANCED  IN  CANADA

THAN  IN THE  UNITED  STATES.

UNFORTUNATELY,  WE ARE RAPIDLY CATCHING UP.

 Regards to All
 Nakano

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives 

[CTRL] =?x-unknown?q?_Tripp=3A_I=92ll_Subpoena_Everybody?=

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Tripp: I’ll Subpoena Everybody

NewsMax.com
Monday, June 5, 2000

Her indictment for illegally taping her phone conversations with
Monica Lewinsky now dismissed, Linda Tripp plans to break her
long silence and tell the world what she knows.

 And she knows plenty, especially about the death of the late
Vincent Foster. As the last person in the White House to see
Foster alive before his body was found later that day at Ft.
Marcy Park, Tripp said he left his office without his briefcase,
contradicting counsel office aide Tom Castleton who had claimed
that Foster taken the briefcase with him The brief case magically
reappeared in his office after his death.

 As reported in NewsMax.com on July, 1998, Tripp, along with
Foster's personal secretary Deborah Gorham, had a front seat view
of the chaos in the counsel's office when a note alleged to be
written by Foster materialized in his briefcase; a development
used by the White House to support the claim that his death had
been a suicide.

When Patsy Thomasson and Bernard Nussbaum (Tripp's boss) had
searched Foster's briefcase on July 20 and 22 respectively, the
note wasn't there. Tripp and Gorham knew something was up when,
on July 26, Nussbaum's assistant Cliff Sloan asked Tripp for a
typewriter despite the fact that the counsel's office was chock
full of computer word processors. No typewriter was readily
available, Tripp explained. On the morning of the 27th, Nussbaum
questioned Gorham about whether she had noticed anything in
Foster's briefcase. Gorham described Nussbaum's grilling as "very
forceful and adamant," saying the meeting felt like an
"interrogation."

Unbeknownst to Tripp and Gorham, 27 shreds of paper the White
House would claim was Foster's suicide note had been "discovered"
in the briefcase the day before. Nussbaum waited thirty hours
before informing the Park Police on the 28th. It was a
handwritten note with no traceable fingerprints. Investigators
working for Robert Fiske and Kenneth Starr have ruled the note
was authentic. But three independent handwriting experts, one of
worldwide renown, determined in 1995 that it was a forgery.

 ``If I continue to remain silent, they win,'' Tripp told an
audience in South Carolina, according to the Associated Press.

 Tripp has shied away from public appearances, leaving it up to
her attorneys to speak for her, but she’s now ready to have her
say.

 ``I am not a public person. All this is very difficult for me,''
she said.

First on her agenda is her lawsuit against the White House and
the Defense Department, charging that her privacy rights were
violated when officials leaked information about her from
confidential government records to reporters.

A Pentagon inspector general's report concluded that Defense
Department spokesman Kenneth Bacon and his then-chief deputy,
Clifford H. Bernath violated Tripp's privacy rights by providing
information from her security clearance records to Jane Mayer, a
reporter for The New Yorker magazine.

Although the inspector general found that both Bacon and Bernath
broke the law the Justice Department refused to prosecute the
men. Bacon got off with a reprimand from Defense Secretary
William Cohen.

 Tripp however, vowed she will not let the matter rest.

 ``In the next few weeks, we will be subpoenaing every national
name you can imagine in the White House,'' she said. ``It really
is up to the civil process to hold them accountable.''




=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To 

[CTRL] Court Dismisses Hubbell Charge

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Court Dismisses Hubbell Charge



Updated 10:51 AM ET June 5, 2000

By LAURIE ASSEO, Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON (AP) -

The Supreme Court today handed presidential friend Webster
Hubbell a victory that wipes out his guilty plea to a misdemeanor
tax charge.

The justices' 8-1 ruling said prosecutors could not use financial
documents against Hubbell that he was forced to produce under a
limited grant of immunity.  Using the documents would violate his
protection against self-incrimination under the Constitution's
Fifth Amendment, the justices said.

Hubbell pleaded guilty to the tax charge last year on condition
his plea would be dismissed if the Supreme Court ruled in his
favor on whether the documents could be used.

Today, the nation's highest court ordered the charge against him
dismissed.

"The documents did not magically appear in the prosecutor's
office like 'manna from heaven,"' Justice John Paul Stevens wrote
for the court. "They arrived there only after (Hubbell) asserted
his constitutional privilege, received a grant of immunity" and
provided the documents.

"We have no doubt that the constitutional privilege against
self-incrimination protects the target of a grand jury
investigation from being compelled to answer questions designed
to elicit information about the existence of sources of
potentially incriminating evidence," Stevens wrote.

Hubbell had reached the plea agreement with former independent
counsel Kenneth Starr, who was replaced by Robert W.  Ray last
October.

Hubbell was the former No.  3 official at the Justice Department
early in President Clinton's first term and has been a friend of
the president and his wife Hillary Rodham Clinton since their
Arkansas days.

The misdemeanor tax charge alleged that Hubbell evaded paying
taxes on some of the hundreds of thousands of dollars in income
he received from friends of the Clintons in 1994 during an
earlier investigation by Starr.

The tax charge, filed in April 1998, was based partly on
Hubbell's financial papers that he was required to give
prosecutors under a limited grant of immunity.

Although the Fifth Amendment protects criminal defendants from
being forced to testify against themselves, it does not protect
the contents of private documents someone created voluntarily.

However, the amendment does protect people from being forced to
give such documents to prosecutors, because that usually involves
confirming their existence and authenticity - a form of
testimony.  Therefore, immunity generally must be given to people
being forced to turn over documents.

Hubbell argued that prosecutors could not use his papers to
prosecute him after giving him immunity.  A federal judge agreed
and dismissed the charges.

The U.S.  Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
revived the charges in January 1999 but said Starr's office could
use information from them only by showing prosecutors had
"reasonably particular knowledge" of their existence.

Starr's office conceded it could not meet that standard and
agreed to dismiss Hubbell's plea if the Supreme Court upheld the
appeals court's ruling.

In appealing to the Supreme Court, prosecutors said they should
be allowed to use the documents' contents so long as they did not
try to show the information came from Hubbell.

Prosecutors also argued that Hubbell had no Fifth Amendment
protection against producing the documents in the first place.

People can be forced to turn over documents without immunity if
the government already knows they exist, because prosecutors
would not need the person's confirmation of their existence.
Prosecutors in Hubbell's case said routine financial records
count as documents whose existence is a foregone conclusion.

Hubbell's lawyers argued that the grant of immunity meant the
documents he turned over were "hopelessly tainted" and could not
be used as evidence.

Today, the Supreme Court agreed with Hubbell.

"Here the government has not shown that it had any prior
knowledge of either the existence or the whereabouts of the
13,120 pages of documents ultimately produced" by Hubbell,
Stevens said.  "The government cannot cure this deficiency
through the overbroad argument that a businessman ...  will
always possess general business and tax records."

Stevens' opinion was joined by Justices Sandra Day O'Connor,
Antonin Scalia, Anthony M.  Kennedy, David H.  Souter, Clarence
Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer.

Chief Justice William H.  Rehnquist dissented, saying he agreed
with a judge who dissented from the federal appeals court
decision.

Not affected by today's case is Hubbell's guilty plea to a felony
charge involving legal work for a savings and loan at the center
of the Whitewater investigation.  He was sentenced to a year of
probation on that charge in June 1999.

Hubbell previously served 16 months in prison for bilking his
former Arkansas law firm and its clients.  That charge resulted
from the earlier investigation by Starr.


[CTRL] NM: Justice Department's Corruption

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Newsmax-May 31, 2000

Justice Department's Corruption


By Paul Craig Roberts

If you were a U.S. attorney general confronting possibly the
biggest presidential scandal in American history and the FBI
director strongly advised you to recuse yourself from the
investigation because of a conflict of interest, would you ever
forget such a tense and dramatic moment?

 On May 19, Attorney General Janet Reno said, "I don't have a
recollection" of FBI Director Louis J. Freeh advising her, face
to face, to recuse herself from the Clinton-Gore-Chinese campaign
finance scandal.

 The collective amnesia of the Clinton administration is a
wondrous thing. It makes you wonder how these people find their
way to work in the morning. Also suffering from memory loss is
Lee Radek. Radek spearheads Reno's cover-up of the scandal. Radek
doesn't recall telling two senior FBI officials that he was
"under a lot of pressure" to cover up the scandal, because Reno's
job "hangs in the balance."

 But FBI Deputy Director William J. Esposito and Assistant
Director Neil J. Gallagher haven't lost their memory. Both
confirm that Radek made the statements that he doesn't recall.

 Radek's memory has failed him altogether. He can't recall why he
assigned the important investigation of the role played by
Chinese government money in the 1996 U.S. presidential election
to an unqualified and inexperienced prosecutor, who promptly
disorganized the investigation.

 Neither can Radek explain why he issued a "cease and desist"
order to the U.S. attorney in Los Angeles, who was nailing down
Vice President Gore's role in the illegal fund raising.

 Nor can Radek give a reason for his order blocking FBI agents
from seizing evidence of the scandal before it could be
destroyed.

 There is no doubt whatsoever that the DOJ has been obstructing
justice. In fact, the situation is so serious and so explosive
that the DOJ has called on the departmental loyalty of former
Republican Justice Department officials to quiet the waters and
keep the cover-up from being investigated by a subsequent
administration.

 "People might lose confidence in the government," they implore,
as if anyone has a drop of confidence in the DOJ.

 In a recent speech at Hillsdale College, U.S. Rep. Bob Barr,
R-Ga., a former U.S. attorney, blames the politicization of the
DOJ on Bill Clinton.

 As Latin Americans are fond of saying, "When corruption begins
at the top, everything falls into decay."

 Conservatives used to emphasize the importance of Supreme Court
appointments as the reason for voting Republican. Today, they
emphasize cleaning up the Department of Justice. In the June 5
issue of National Review, Byron York says that everyone believes
that the biggest task of the next administration is cleaning out
the DOJ.

 Griffin Bell, who was attorney general in the Carter
administration, says "it would be better to have a Republican"
win the next presidential election. "Then, you can just change
everybody."

 If only it were that simple. Unfortunately, the corruption in
the DOJ goes deeper than personnel. The very concept of law that
protects us from tyranny has been lost. No longer the people's
shield, law has become a weapon in the hands of government.

 As Lawrence M. Stratton and I show in our just published book,
"The Tyranny of Good Intentions," each of the legal principles
that protect us from arbitrary and abusive government power has
been eroded by ambitious prosecutors, inattentive judges and
juries, and legal theories inimical to our legal heritage.

 William Blackstone called these protective principles "the
Rights of Englishmen." They are the attorney-client privilege,
due process, habeas corpus, equal standing in law with no group
having status-based privileges, and the prohibitions against
retroactive law, crimes without intent, self-incrimination and
bills of attainder.

 It was not the corrupt Clinton administration that undermined
these rights. The attorney-client privilege was undermined by
Assistant Attorney General Stuart M. Gerson in a Republican
administration, when he justified an asset freeze to coerce the
blue-chip Wall Street law firm Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays 
Handler to pay a $41 million fine for refusing to snitch on a
client. It was not the corrupt Clinton administration that
criminalized the Exxon Valdez accident, or brought a bill of
attainder against Charles Keating, or created retroactive
liability with Superfund or vitiated the 1964 Civil Rights Act by
imposing illegal racial quotas.

 It was not the Clinton administration that initiated the vile
practices of confiscating people's assets without indicting and
convicting them of a crime and paying criminals to concoct
testimony against people targeted by prosecutors.

 It wasn't Clinton who resurrected torture and self-incrimination
with coerced plea bargains.

 The corruption of DOJ personnel is a reflection of the
corruption of law.

 The Justice Department cannot be restored until the law is.


[CTRL] 5 Branch Davidians' sentences set aside

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

5 Branch Davidians' sentences set aside

By Richard Carelli, Associated Press, 6/5/2000 10:54

WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court today set aside the lengthy
prison sentences given to five Branch Davidians who survived a
1993 siege at the sect's Waco, Texas, compound.  The court ruled
that a federal judge misused an anti-gun law to increase their
punishment.

The unanimous decision makes it harder for courts to find
lawbreakers deserve extra time behind bars because they used or
carried machine guns during their crimes.

A federal law subjects anyone who used or carried a ''firearm''
during a violent or drug-related crime to five years in prison.
The term jumps to 30 years for anyone who used or carried a
''machine gun'' during that same crime.

Federal appeals courts had split on whether determining use of a
machine gun is an element of the offense a jury must find beyond
a reasonable doubt, or merely a sentencing factor a judge gets to
determine by a preponderance of the evidence.

The nation's highest court said use of a firearm must be
determined by the jury.

''We believe Congress intended the firearm type-related words it
used ...  to refer to an element of a separate, aggravated
crime,'' Justice Stephen G.  Breyer wrote for the court.

Five Davidians were convicted in 1994 in the killings of four
federal agents during a botched Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms raid on the compound outside Waco.

The raid led to a 51-day standoff that ended when flames swept
through the compound. David Koresh and some 80 followers died
during the inferno, some from the fire and others from gunshot
wounds.

A federal jury acquitted the five Davidians of murder and
conspiracy-to-murder charges but convicted them of voluntary
manslaughter.  Each was sentenced to 10 years in prison for that
conviction.  The jury also found them guilty of using firearms.

The presiding judge tacked on 30-year sentences for four of them
and a 10-year sentence for the fifth after finding that each had
used a machine gun.

Renos Avraam, Brad Eugene Branch, Jaime Castillo and Kevin
Whitecliff drew the 30-year sentences; Graeme Craddock the
10-year term.  Craddock also was sentenced to a consecutive 10
years for using a hand grenade.

The jury never had been asked to determine what types of firearms
the five had used. The judge made that determination during
sentencing.

In appealing their sentences, the Davidians relied heavily on a
decision in which the justices last year said carjackers cannot
be given tougher sentences unless a jury, not a judge, determines
that victims were seriously injured during that federal crime.

The case presumably will return to a federal trial court where
new sentencing hearings will be conducted.  Today's decision did
not suggest appropriate new sentences.

The case is Castillo vs.  U.S., 99-658.



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: The Price of Progress

2000-06-05 Thread Kris Millegan





Smog May Induce Heart Attacks

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Smog apparently doesn't hurt just your lungs: New
scientific research suggests that even moderate smog may induce sudden death
in people with existing heart problems.

The newfound evidence, culled from more than a dozen studies on humans and
animals, shows that tiny pieces of soot called particulates may alter the
heart rate in some people, the Los Angeles Times reported Monday.

The link has not yet been proven, but there is a strong likelihood that the
particles cause the heart problems, possibly indicating air pollution poses a
greater public health threat than previously thought, the newspaper said.

Heart disease is the top killer in the United States, responsible for about
half of all deaths.

At smog levels found in many U.S. cities, the inhalation of particulates can
disrupt a person's ability to regulate the pumping of blood. The threat is
particularly severe for older people who have arrhythmia, a condition marked
by an irregular heartbeat.

``When particulate pollution increases, the heart rate seems to go up a
little bit and the variability in the heart rate seems to go down. Those are
things classically seen (in people) with heart failure,'' said Dr. Timothy
Denton, a cardiologist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

``Studies suggest that people are dying relatively rapidly after you see an
increase in particles. Sometimes it's within 24 hours,'' said Robert Devlin
of the Environmental Protection Agency's clinical research branch.

Changes in heart rhythm that occur after breathing particulates are subtle on
an electrocardiogram and do not affect healthy people.

Arden Pope, an epidemiologist at Brigham Young University, said ``it's
incredibly good news'' if the link can be proven.

``We already know that about half of us die of cardiopulmonary disease, and
if this is true about particulates, we have found a preventable cause,'' Pope
said.




[CTRL] Fwd: The Dot-Com Economy Downloads

2000-06-05 Thread Kris Millegan





 In Europe, "dot-coms" are going belly-up, and starry-eyed high-tech
yuppies are hocking their laptops to pay the rent, in record numbers, as the
global stock market tightens up and scales down. That shock wave is already
hitting US shores.

"Merrill Lynch forecasts that as many as 75% of today's Net companies
will fail.
" 'The number of people [losing their investments or their jobs] will be
bigger than any of us imagine. People have been dreading this moment for so
long ...' ''


Business Week: June 12, 2000
News: Analysis  Commentary: The Tech Economy

   It's Layoff Time in Dot-Com Land

Call the offices of toysmart.com, one of the latest Net companies to go
belly-up, and you will hear a recording giving directions for employers
aiming to recruit the company's staff. Activated just two days after
toysmart's May 22 announcement that it was shutting down, the recording came
in reaction to an avalanche of calls from 200 companies looking to scoop up
toysmart's 170 employees. ``It was either put that up or my assistant was
going to kill herself,'' jokes CEO David N. Lord.
   A laughing CEO is about the last thing you would expect to find at the
helm of a company gone bust. But 36-year-old Lord exemplifies the optimism
many Net employees still feel, despite the carnage now coursing through the
dot-coms. ``I think 75% of our people will end up in tech startups or next
stage companies,'' says Lord. Heck, he expects to join another dot-com before
too long himself.
TEMPORARY. It's layoff time in dot-com land--and like everything else that
has taken place in that sometimes unreal world, the experience bears little
resemblance to its counterpart in the brick-and-mortar universe. Even as many
once-optimistic dot-coms shed employees to cut costs or file for bankruptcy
as they run out of funds altogether, many Net employees are still willing to
stay in the game. Betting that the downturn is only temporary, they figure
that the initial-public-offering market will open up again, and that venture
capitalists, still flush with cash and in need of investments, will keep the
funds flowing.
   Is this a smart bet? Clearly, the sector has only felt the very first
stings of digital Darwinism. As investors increasingly demand profits,
dot-coms are being forced to ax bloated marketing budgets and prune
overstaffed operations. To date, that pressure has been felt only by the
predictable weak sisters of the sector, such as drkoop.com, which has laid
off 35% of its staff since April, and living.com, where 13% of workers lost
their jobs in May.
   But most analysts say there are many more cutbacks, layoffs, and
bankruptcies to come. Indeed, Merrill Lynch  Co.'s Henry M. Blodget
forecasts that as many as 75% of today's Net companies will fail. ``The
number of people getting pink slips will be bigger than any of us imagine,''
warns Tuck Rickards, executive director at recruiter Russell Reynolds
Associates Inc.
   In the face of such predictions, even those dot-coms that are not running
out of money tomorrow now feel the need to increase fiscal discipline. Many
are reassessing budget decisions and staffing levels set six to eight months
ago, when cash was plentiful. Portal AltaVista Co., for instance, fired 5% of
its workforce in May in order to improve its still-pending projected
profitability in advance of its initial public offering. ``People have been
dreading this moment for so long; the economy has been so good,'' says Lorin
Kalisky, director of content and communications at AirTreks.com, an online
travel service.
   This lesson, however, is not being lost on erstwhile Kool-Aid-quaffing
dot-com devotees. They too are exercising a lot more discipline as they look
for dot-com jobs. Most of those with some experience are no longer willing to
sign on with long-shot Net operations, even though those have brought the
biggest return in the sector's favorite currency: stock options. Well aware
that getting rich quick on a Net IPO may now be more the exception than the
rule, employees are demanding more assurances. They are asking for better
severance and benefits packages and are doing due diligence on management and
funding of dot-coms. They are also looking for safe havens. Suddenly,
companies that offer profitable balance sheets, such as Yahoo! and eBay, or
the online units of Old Economy giants, are far more attractive, even though
they provide far less opportunity to strike it rich.
   In the past, these companies, with their established big valuations,
didn't have much allure for those hoping to make a quick killing with stock
options or with an IPO. Now, eBay Inc. and Yahoo Inc. say they have had an
uptick in the number or the quality of potential recruits. ``It's a very
challenging market--don't get me wrong. Frankly, there were people we
couldn't get three months ago who are returning our calls now,'' says Rebecca
Guerra, eBay's vice-president for human resources.
NOT THE SAME. Moreover, when it comes to 

[CTRL] Fwd: Corporate Pension Scam Catches On

2000-06-05 Thread Kris Millegan





 "Corporations are hailing the many advantages to converting pensions to
a cash balance plan, but an independent analysis showed that less than half
of companies save any more than 5 percent in pension costs by making such a
switch."
 " 'Cost reduction was not what a majority of the plans were trying to
achieve.' '


Congress Hears Complaints On Pensions

By CURT ANDERSON

WASHINGTON (AP) - A 28-year electric utility employee told Congress the
company's conversion to a new cash-balance pension plan will cost him
$400,000 in benefits, which he said is evidence the popular plans
discriminate against older workers.

``For me, this is a very serious loss,'' James Bruggeman, 51, of the Central
and South West Corp. in Tulsa, Okla., told the Senate Aging Committee. ``It
may very well change my retirement plans. I would have to work several more
years to make up the loss.''

Bruggeman said that because of his long service, retirement benefits he
expected under the company's previous traditional pension plan would have
been 30 percent higher than under the new plan. And due to what's known as
``wearaway,'' the initial cash balance in his new pension account was $56,000
less than the equivalent lump sum in the old one and will require two years
to recoup.

``It seems to me that something somebody is entitled to is lost,'' said Sen.
Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the panel.

Similar complaints have been raised by hundreds of veteran employees around
the country as more than 450 companies converted to the new plans. The plans
frequently save employers money and provide younger workers with pensions
that are more flexible, easier to carry from job to job and simpler to
administer.

Advocates for older people, however, say they violate anti-discrimination
laws because, in cases like Bruggeman's, promised pension benefits are
reduced for workers with long service.

``There is very definitely, for an older worker, less accumulation than there
is for a younger worker,'' said Joseph Perkins, immediate past president of
the AARP. ``We worry about the fact that it's the older worker who gets the
raw end of the deal.''

Several bills have been introduced in Congress on the issue, some focusing on
greater disclosure of how changes would affect individual workers and others
requiring that companies give workers greater choice between new and old
plans. In addition, several Clinton administration agencies are trying to
determine if age discrimination laws are being violated.

Industry representatives told the Aging Committee of many advantages to cash
balance plans and said they don't inherently discriminate against older
employees. An analysis by Watson Wyatt Worldwide Inc., a leading human
resources consultant, showing that only about 45 percent of companies it
studied saved greater than 5 percent in pension costs by making the switch.

``Cost reduction was not what a majority of the plans were trying to
achieve,'' said Sylvester Schieber, Watson Wyatt's research director.

Laurel Sweatt, benefits manager for Dallas-based CSW - the company Bruggeman
works for - said the company took several steps to ``minimize any detrimental
impact'' when it switched to the new plan. These included a choice between
the new and old plans for employees who were 50 years old and had 10 years of
service and an addition of 13 percent in base pay to accounts of workers who
were over 40 and had at least five years' service.

Some witnesses testified that more laws and regulations might force some
companies to drop pensions altogether and continue a downward trend that has
seen such benefits drop from 114,000 companies in 1985 to 44,000 today.

``We continue to believe that it is up to employers to decide what retirement
strategy works best for them,'' said John Woyke, an attorney testifying on
behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.





Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

From: "Nicky Molloy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I'm sorry to have to tell you this

No you're not...


 but really this is tiring and its a darn
 less boring than reading you saying the same confudsed comments every post.

"Confudsed"?


 If you can't/won't grasp the situation and get your own information which is
 readily available on the net, I can't help you.

You are the one who is presumably 'confused'

Sure, there is loads of 'information' on the Internet.  But information is
not necessarily EVIDENCE.  And very often it is disinformation.


 Provide evidence that there
 aren't aliens here because if you investigate, there is more evidence that
 there is company down in underground bases than not.

You are asking us to prove a negative.

Prove that I did NOT shoot JFK.

Prove that I did NOT have a torrid affair with Jacques Vallee, whose
whispered pillowtalk to me revealed all the secrets of UFOs that he knew...
not to mention some interesting gossip regarding Mr. Webre...

Prove that I was NOT at Woodstock in August of 1969...

Prove that I did NOT walk on the moon with Neil Armstrong that same month...

There is absolutely NO 'evidence' supporting what you purport to be FACT...
there IS information, of various degrees of credibility.  But again,
information is not necessarily EVIDENCE.


 I"ve been studying the
 situation for at least 10 years, and have personal experiences

Can you prove that they were NOT hallucinations?

Can you prove that they were NOT the effects of mind control?


 and know UNTOLD others who have had dealings with Ets.

The same questions apply to these 'untold others'.  And unless you're
claiming to have had dealings with these same ETs, all you have is
hearsay.

I could tell you that I and untold others have been repeatedly
abducted by motorcycle gangsor Arab terrorists...or Satanists...
or leprechauns...

How would you know that our claims were NOT true?


 If there are 6 billion people on this planet, untold thousands of UFOs
 flying about and still we stubbornly believe we are the only planet
 inhabited in this solar system,

No one has said that.

What we are saying is that you and the other 'true believers' have yet
to present any HARD EVIDENCE to support the claim that UFOs are powered
by ETs...

And tell me...of all the "billions and billions" (to borrow Carl Sagan's
famous phrase) of planets not only in our own solar system, but throughout
the universe...why have your supposed ETs chosen this measly planet?
What is it about Earth and/or homo sapiens that intrigues them so much
that they ignore all the other planets and concentrate on this one?


 and any of these UFOs out there could have
 colonized the whole solar system by now,

"Could have" isn't the same as "did".


 CASE CLOSED

You failed to even successfully open it.


 Well tenebroust, I guess the reason Commander X, Branton etc use non de
 plumes is because are in danger of their lives.

 And you have EVIDENCE to support this claim?   ;-)

I notice you failed to respond to this.  What's the matter...ET got your
tongue?

Or is it because you DON'T have any evidence to back up this claim?


 They were intelligence officers and we don't
 really need to know their personal details.

 Yes we do, if we are to adequately and accurately assess their credibility.

Again, no answer.  You take the coward's way out by responding by attacking
those who question you, because you know you can't back up any of your claims.

You also failed to address my question as to why these supposed ex-intelligence
officers aren't being silenced by either their ex-comrades-in-arms, or by the
ETs themselves.  Are your ETs that ineffectual?  Or is it because these supposed
ex-intelligence officers are really LYING...


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send 

[CTRL] Internet privacy: UK Europe

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

From:

http://www.observer.co.uk/focus/story/0,6903,328071,00.html


Your Privacy Ends Here!


When you wake on Thursday 5 October next, you will find yourself
living in a different country. An ancient bulwark of English law
- the principle that someone is presumed innocent until proven
guilty - will have been overturned.  And that is just for
starters. From that date also the police and security services
will enjoy sweeping powers to snoop on your email traffic and web
use without let or hindrance from the Commissioner for Data
Protection.  Every UK internet service provider (ISP) will have
to install a black box which monitors all the data-traffic
passing through its computers, hard-wired to a special centre
currently being installed in MI5's London headquarters.  This new
mass surveillance facility is called the Government Technical
Assistance Centre (GTAC). Who said Jack Straw had no sense of
humour?  The Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Bill which
is now before the Lords gives the Home Secretary powers of
interception and surveillance which would be the envy of the most
draconian regime. In addition to encroaching on civil liberties,
the same Bill will also drive hordes of e-commerce companies from
Britain to countries like Ireland where their encryption keys -
extended pin numbers allowing users to decipher jumbled data -
will be protected from government prying. An administration which
complains continually about making Britain 'the most e-friendly
country in the world' by 2002 is busily making sure that exactly
the opposite happens.

How has this extraordinary state of affairs come about? Is it
another manifestation of the cock-up theory of history, or are
there more sinister forces at work? The answer is a bit of both.
For some time, it has been obvious to Ministers and civil
servants that British law needed updating to cope with the
internet. In an era when online trading becomes ubiquitous, for
example, some way has to be found of making 'digital signatures'
legally valid. Accordingly, a special Cabinet Office unit headed
by Professor Jim Norton set to work to devise a new legislative
framework for the emerging world of e-commerce and online
communications. The main result of his labour was the Electronic
Commerce Bill.

As that Bill went through its Parliamentary hoops, it became
clear that some parts of it - mainly the sections dealing with
data encryption, interception and surveillance - were so deeply
flawed that they threatened to sink the Bill. Given the
Government's desire to make headway on the e-commerce front, the
problematic sections were eventually jettisoned and the
Electronic Commerce Bill became law in 1999.

It was a smart decision, but it left unresolved the problem of
what to do about the encryption stuff. The DTI, smarting from its
bruising at the hands of the computer scientists who had
comprehensively shredded the original encryption proposals,
wanted nothing more to do with it. Accordingly the poisoned
chalice passed to the Home Office, which knows little of business
and even less about the internet, but is endlessly attentive to
the needs of the police, the security services and the Byzantine
imperatives of official secrecy. The RIP Bill is the fruit of
that secretive bureaucratic milieu.  The official rationale for
the legislation is that it is required to bring UK law into
conformance with the European Convention on Human Rights. In the
end, this will have to be tested in the courts, but Straw's
confidence is not shared by the Commons Trade  Industry Select
Committee which last October recommended that the Government
publish a detailed analysis to substantiate its confidence that
the Bill does not contravene the Convention. This the Government
has so far declined to do.

The Bill has four main parts. The first deals with the
interception of communications. the second covers 'surveillance
and covert human intelligence sources'. The third tackles
encryption and the fourth covers the 'scrutiny of investigatory
powers and of the functions of the intelligence services'. Parts
I to III propose massive extensions of the state's powers to spy
on its citizens while the fourth suggests a regulatory regime
which seems laughably inadequate to anyone familiar with internet
technology. All sections of the Bill have been heavily criticised
by external experts and a small number of committed MPs, but the
legislation has passed through its Commons scrutiny with its
central provisions intact.

Part I gives the Home Secretary the power to issue a warrant
requiring ISPs to intercept the communications of one or more of
their subscribers. The problem is that the internet is not like
the telephone system - where it is technically feasible to tap
into a particular individual's communications link. In order to
monitor a person's internet traffic, you have to tap into all the
traffic running through his or her ISP. As a result, the
expectation is that Part I of the Bill will be 

Re: [CTRL] WHAT IN THE WORLD CAN HE DO NEXT

2000-06-05 Thread Tenorlove

And if elected President, I declare the other 11 months to be Straight
Pride Month!!

Tenorlove
Do I have to do EVERYTHING myself!?

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] JW: Flash! COURT ORDERS E-MAIL SEARCH IN FILEGATE CASE

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

From:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/media/preleases/2000/060500a.htm

COURT ORDERS E-MAIL SEARCH IN FILEGATE CASE

Closing In On The Clinton-Gore White House E-Mail Scandal

(Washington, DC) Today the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia issued a preliminary search of e-mail in the
Filegate case. The parameters of the search will include e-mails
concerning Hillary Rodham Clinton, Vincent Foster, Bernard
Nussbaum, Craig Livingstone, Anthony Marceca, Bill Kennedy,
Marsha Scott, Betsy Pond, Deborah Gorham, Linda Tripp, Mari
Anderson, George Stephanopoulos, Harold Ickes, Margaret Williams,
Lisa Wetzl, Jonathan Denbo, Edward Hughes, Jane Dannenhauer,
Nancy Gemmell, Jane Sherburne, Terry Good, Christine Varney, John
Libonati, Jeff Undercoffer, Arnie Cole, Cheryl Mills, Stephen
Waudby, Michael McCurry, Joseph Lockhart, Sidney Blumenthal,
Bruce Lindsey, Charles Ruff, and President William Clinton.
Judicial Watch uncovered the burgeoning e-mail scandal in its
Filegate lawsuit.

A copy of the Court's Orders can be found at Judicial Watch's
website at www.JudicialWatch.org.

"Importantly, the Clinton-Gore White House has twenty days to
produce these documents," stated Judicial Watch Chairman and
General Counsel Larry Klayman.

###


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FULL OPINION: http://www.judicialwatch.org/otherserver/emailorder.htm
_

CARA ALEXANDER, et al.
   Plaintiffs,
   vs.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, et al.,

   Defendants.
_
JOHN MICHAEL GRIMLEY, et al.
   Plaintiffs,
   vs.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, et al.,

   Defendants.
_ )
)
)   Civil Action Nos. 96-2123/97-1288 (RCL)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs' Supplemental
Brief to their Motion to Compel the Production of Documents
Regarding their Second Request to the Executive Office of the
President ("EOP") Regarding ARMS E-mail. This court issued a
prior ruling, on May 17, 2000, on the Plaintiffs' Motion to
Compel the Production of Documents. In that order, however, the
court deferred on the plaintiffs' requests as to e-mails and hard
drives. The parties then filed supplemental memoranda regarding
the plaintiffs' request for an ARMS search of e-mail. Upon
consideration of these memoranda, and the reply and surreply
thereto, the court will GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART the
plaintiffs' request for an ARMS e-mail search, as discussed and
ordered below. The court will continue to DEFER on the
plaintiffs' requests for hard drives and those e-mails that are
not archived on the ARMS system.


Judicial Watch, Inc.
501 School Street, S.W.; Suite 725; Washington, D.C. 20024
Tel: (888) JW-ETHIC; Fax: (202) 646-5199
http://www.JudicialWatch.org



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

From: "Samantha L." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 It isn't the intellect alone that is equips us with discernment.  The
 personal accounts of such people as Whitley Strieber, Betty Andreasson Lucas
 and others, including those accounts outlined in John Mack, M.D.'s books are
 quite moving and compelling.

Agreed.  Their various accounts perhaps do point to contact with extraterrestial
beings.

But there could be other explanations as well, and we would be well served to
constantly keep that in mind.  What Strieber, Lucas, et al have experienced
could perhaps be what manipulators behind the scenes WISH them to believe they
experienced.

Smoke and mirrors.  Don't concentrate on the magic trick on stage, look for
who's pulling the strings and pushing the buttons behind the curtain...

As a side note:  Betty Andreasson Lucas now lives in my homestate of
Connecticut, and has written about strange occurances happening around where
she lives.

I TOO have had strange occurances happen in the same neck of the woods.  But
in my case, while the events/sensations were strange, I never attributed
what I saw or heard to beings from outer space, but suspect the occurances
originated from the military -- there IS an Air National Guard station in
the area...


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Ritalin Market Soars

2000-06-05 Thread Kris Millegan





 "The researchers found that problems such as attention deficit disorder,
depression and learning disabilities have more than doubled from 1979 to
1996."


Kids' Behavioral Problems Said Soar

By LINDSEY TANNER
.c The Associated Press

CHICAGO (AP) - New research suggests that the number of U.S. youngsters with
emotional and behavioral problems soared in the past two decades, in part
because of more poor and single-parent households.

The findings, echoing other recent studies, are based on surveys of
pediatricians on more than 21,000 patients.

The researchers said it is not a case of doctors getting better at
recognizing and diagnosing emotional and behavioral problems. Instead, they
said there is a real increase in such problems among youngsters.

The researchers found that problems such as attention deficit/hyperactivity
disorder, depression and learning disabilities more than doubled from 1979 to
1996. Such conditions were identified in 6.8 percent of all doctor visits in
1979 and in 18.7 percent of visits in 1996.

Differences in doctor training in identifying such problems did not account
for the increases, said Dr. Kelly Kelleher of the University of Pittsburgh
and Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, the study's lead author.

In fact, the highest identification rates were for doctors who trained in the
1970s and before.

The findings suggest instead that most of the change was due to ``an increase
in problems and the kinds of patients they're seeing,'' said Kelleher, whose
study appears in the June issue of the journal Pediatrics.

The changes were associated with increases in the proportions of
single-parent families and Medicaid enrollment from 1979 to 1996, the
researchers said. Fifteen percent of patients in the 1979 study lived in
single-parent homes, compared with 22 percent in the 1996 study. Just 6
percent of the earlier patients were on Medicaid, compared with 18 percent of
the 1996 patients.

However, pediatricians are geared primarily to deal with ``acute'' problems
in which ``children come in, the doctor gives them medicine, the children go
away,'' Kelleher said. Doctors will be ineffective unless the system is
restructured to allow pediatricians to act more like mental-health
professionals and spend more time with chronic ailments, he said.

The authors examined data from a 1979 survey of 30 Rochester, N.Y.-area
pediatricians, and compared the results with 1996 data from a
government-funded study of 395 pediatricians nationwide. A total of 21,065
patients ages 4 to 15 were involved.

The largest changes were in attention deficit/hyperactivity, which increased
from 1.4 percent to 9.2 percent, and emotional problems such as anxiety and
depression, which increased from a negligible amount to 3.6 percent.

John Lavigne, chief psychologist at Children's Memorial Hospital in Chicago,
said that despite the researchers' findings, some of the increase can
probably be attributed to pediatricians getting better at recognizing the
problems.

The study ``means that doctors before must have been underestimating the
problem,'' Lavigne said. ``Chances are they've increased their ability to
recognize them.''




[CTRL] Drudge: Tina Brown/Disney Book Outs Starr Staffers, Reporters

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

X DRUDGE REPORT X MONDAY JUNE 05 2000 14:19:07 ET X

TINA BROWN, DISNEY BOOK PROJECT EXPOSES DIRT ON CLINTON CRITICS;
AUTHOR OUTS 'GAY' STARR STAFFERS, REPORTERS

**Exclusive**

Wait until Mickey Mouse hears about this!

The DRUDGE REPORT has obtained a working manuscript of a book
commissioned by DISNEY's TALK/MIRAMAX imprint -- a book that digs
deep into the private sex lives and business dealings of major
and minor Clinton critics!

Author John Connolly [NY MAG, PREMIERE] has been working
feverishly behind the scenes on his slash and trash
investigation.

"There are no less than six gays involved in the [Lewinsky] case.
Two of the 'elves', and three of Starr's young male protege's
were gay..." Connolly writes.

Connolly plans to name some names. Using the term "fag hag" to
describe Lewinsky player Lucianne Goldberg, Connolly told the
DRUDGE REPORT that he has an "iron clad contract" with
TALK/MIRAMAX.

"Very little has been written on the personal lives of the people
who were behind the Lewinsky case," writes Connolly, in a working
introduction to THE INSANE CLOWN POSSE.

Connolly has been spending the cash advanced to him by TALK to
explore the personal backgrounds of Clinton scandal insiders.

Best-selling author and syndicated columnist Ann Coulter, who
comes under the Connolly microscope, said on Monday that she was
"harassed" after Connolly brought in a private investigator to
dig into her background.

"The guy began a program of harassment by calling me at home 6
times a day until I changed my number, sending me flowers, and
hiring a private investigator to look into my personal life. I
have a copy of the letter his P.I. sent to an ex-boyfriend of
mine, stating that he was hired by John Connolly to look into
me."

Connolly confirmed that he hired an investigator:

"When Coulter abruptly stopped taking my calls for whatever
reason, my P.I. said he knew someone who was a friend of Bob
Guccione Jr., who Coulter had dated."

TALK/MIRAMAX book editor John Burnham noted on Monday that
Connolly is under contract to write CLOWN POSSE, but cautioned
that "no decision have been made" about the book's eventual
content.

"Everything is up for review," said Burnham.

"I will not be bullied around," warns Connolly, "by threats or
lawsuits or anything else."

Hide your cigarettes under the bed, Snow White.

A scorched earth alert has been issued.

Developing...



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] News from Hebron: GOOD NEWS (fwd)

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 23:45:18 +
From: Hebron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: News from Hebron:GOOD NEWS

News from Hebron
The Hebron Press Office
June 5, 2000

1. Barak Gov't Nearing End

Likud MK Sylvan Shalom tonight announced that at least 61 MKs
(over half of the 120 Knesset members) will vote for a law
calling for early elections, on Wednesday. Wednesday's vote is a
"preliminary ballot," the first of three Knesset votes
necessitated to pass a law. If this law passes the preliminary
vote on Wednesday, it will spell the beginning of the end of the
Barak administration. Barak will have no choice but to come to
terms with the Likud and pick a date, probably within a few
months, for new elections for Prime Minister and Knesset.

The major breakthrough seems to have occurred when Barak gave
orders to halt all negotiations with the Shas party concerning
funding of the Shas educational system "El HaMa'ayan." Shas has
reportedly promised that all of its 17 Knesset members will vote
in favor of early elections.  The majority is promised with Shas,
together with Yisrael B'Aliyah (Natan Sharansky) and the NRP, and
the opposition parties, voting for early elections.

Barak was elected last May for a four year term of office.



Presented by
The Jewish Community of Hebron
POB 105 Kiryat Arba, Israel 90100
Tel:972-2-9965333 Fax:972-2-9965304
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to list:subscribe  hebron_today (your name)
Mail to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or via the WWW at
http://virtual.co.il/city_services/lists/hebron/


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread tenebroust

Well, you could certainly be right about these "Ex-military" and "Ex-spy" guys, but 
then again they could just be people who are;
1) Full of a lot of bull who hope to make money using their bullshit stories.
2) Get a kick out of stringing people along with a bunch of malarky.
3) Are currently running a program of disinformation in order to undermine people 
looking into real intelligence matters.
Real researchers often wind up dead when they get too close to stories, none of these 
yahoos ever do.
As for me, well, you can take or leave me, it matters not.  I am not trying to sell an 
agenda, neither am I desirous for people to believe what I say, and as for 
creditability give me as little or as much as you wish, it's up to you.
I don't sign my posts because I like some measure of anonymity, but to people who have 
been here a while I am known, by my real name even.
I don't care whether you listen to or believe me, but if you were circumspect about 
your beliefs Nicky you would question what these whistleblowers say just as much if 
not more than anything I say, since I'm not saying anything as outlandish as the 
claims they make.
I never asked for "undeniable proof" of "aliens" or any other matter.  I just want 
some evidence that can be weighed, and "military man-X's" say-so is not good enough 
for me.  If it good enough for you then so be it.
You may answer or not, it means nothing to me one way or the other.  Naturally I'd 
prefer to carry on a rational two-sided discussion of issues, but if you wish you can 
ignore me just as easily.


On Mon, 05 June 2000, Nicky Molloy wrote:


 -Original Message-
 From: tenebroust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 .  Since there is no real evidence for it, we must just look at it all as
 speculation by "army officer X", or some "covert warrior" who now wants to
 come clean, etc.

 Well tenebroust, I guess the reason Commander X, Branton etc use non de
 plumes is because are in danger of their lives. I think anybody who just
 comes right out like fool with their name, rank and serial number and starts
 spouting off about the alien treaties the US govt has made with ets, really
 wouldn't have that much to say. They were intelligence officers and we don't
 really need to know their personal details. Other intelligence officers can
 know if they are speaking the truth or not and then it spreads from
 there.The information they present us with is generally self evident,
 because of a consistancy that others keep verifying, that they do have
 experience in inside covert operations. There are photos and documents in
 these books.

 Who are you? Why do you use a silly name? We don't know what country you are
 from, which gender, or how old you are, yet you want respect and to be
 listened to merely because your typed letters appear in our inboxes.  Tell
 me why you personally don't give us your full name, address, ICQ number, CV,
 recent photo, race and blood type and birthdate. I'd like to know that
 before I even consider your comments on my post. You are looking for proof
 of someone's rank and their name before you believe them. Yet you are doing
 the same thing by hiding under a false name. Please - you don't even sign
 your posts!!  So you want me to tell you, an indeterminate stranger going on
 public archives how I came by my info like a complete blabbermouth
 I'd have to be tortured to reveal it sorry.

 Please by all means keep us posted with the latest speculation in these
 areas, but let it reamin speculation and not the recitation of fact.


 OK but let me say you did get warned, but took too long looking for
 verifiable factual evidence to your satisfaction.

 Nicky

"Welcome to the desert of the real."  Morpheus, in The Matrix

"My God it's full of stars!"  Dave Bowman, in 2001: A Space
Odyssey
___

Why pay when you don't have to? Get AltaVista Free Internet Access now!
http://jump.altavista.com/freeaccess4.go

___

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL 

Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:

2000-06-05 Thread tenebroust

Thanks David, and I concur.  It would seem to be that people believe what they want to 
believe and give much greater weight to ideas that they have a vested interest in.  I 
do the same thing myself, and know it is universal.  We could all do with getting 
behind things and down to the nitty gritty as it were.


On Mon, 05 June 2000, David Sutherland wrote:


 C'mon NICK you can't be SERIOUS about all this ET UFO B.S. - these guys are
 tools - mostly book and video salesman!!!

 "Conspiracy Theory" and all its associated trappings (UFO's, ETs,
 Abductions, etc)  is now as much a political TOOL as everything else is.

 I mean, if many of these ex-secret intel or otherwise UFO 'exposers' and
 supposed 'researchers' were what they claim to be - would it be THAT
 difficult to "slience" these clowns if the so-called near omnipotent "black"
 government, or whatever agency is supposed to 'hush' all this nonsense up,
 is really extant?

 Its pure religio-political propoganda, religio - because in many cases you
 will find all sorts of esoteric mumbo jumbo and 'spiritual' twadde and
 hysteria associated with many of these beliefs if ETs, Abductions, UFO's,
 and et al. To what purpose is this propoganda however, would be a far more
 interesting and profuitable exercise and use of time imho.



 - Original Message -
 From: "Nicky Molloy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] UFO EVIDENCE:


  -Original Message-
  From: tenebroust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  Since there is no real evidence for it, we must just look at it all
 as
  speculation by "army officer X", or some "covert warrior" who now wants to
  come clean, etc.
 
  Well tenebroust, I guess the reason Commander X, Branton etc use non de
  plumes is because are in danger of their lives. I think anybody who just
  comes right out like fool with their name, rank and serial number and
 starts
  spouting off about the alien treaties the US govt has made with ets,
 really
  wouldn't have that much to say. They were intelligence officers and we
 don't
  really need to know their personal details. Other intelligence officers
 can
  know if they are speaking the truth or not and then it spreads from
  there.The information they present us with is generally self evident,
  because of a consistancy that others keep verifying, that they do have
  experience in inside covert operations. There are photos and documents in
  these books.


  Who are you? Why do you use a silly name? We don't know what country you
 are
  from, which gender, or how old you are, yet you want respect and to be
  listened to merely because your typed letters appear in our inboxes.  Tell
  me why you personally don't give us your full name, address, ICQ number,
 CV,
  recent photo, race and blood type and birthdate. I'd like to know that
  before I even consider your comments on my post. You are looking for proof
  of someone's rank and their name before you believe them. Yet you are
 doing
  the same thing by hiding under a false name. Please - you don't even sign
  your posts!!  So you want me to tell you, an indeterminate stranger going
 on
  public archives how I came by my info like a complete blabbermouth
  I'd have to be tortured to reveal it sorry.
 
  Please by all means keep us posted with the latest speculation in these
  areas, but let it reamin speculation and not the recitation of fact.
 
 
  OK but let me say you did get warned, but took too long looking for
  verifiable factual evidence to your satisfaction.
 
  Nicky
 
 
  On Sat, 03 June 2000, Nicky Molloy wrote:
 
  
   Well Tenebroust,
  
   I think we can safely say that American abductions could sometimes be
 the
   military because they sometimes pretend they are aliens by using virtual
   reality scenarios. But the American govt did build about 50 bases for
 the
   greys which was done by Rand Corp. I'll find the info. English people
  seldom
   get abducted by greys according to a UK UFO mag. Abductees in US have
 gone
   underground to both grey and military bases..
  
   According to Branton, there are even more greys under Los Alamos than
 even
   under Dulce, a major nesting area going back to native American times.
 He
   has heard of an area near Los Alamos where the Feds bring huge shipments
  of
   cattle for picking up by grey ships on an almost daily basis. It is a
   forrested area southwest of Los Alamos where pictograms of 'aliens'
 exist.
   So the aliens have been in that area long before the atom-jacks came in.
   Also setting off nuclear blasts burns away the membrane between this
   dimension and the next which would allow any interdimensional entities
  easy
   access to our dimension. There is apparently more Ets seen in Nevada
 than
   some other places possibly due to the nuclear bombs.
  
   Other people in other countries have been abducted and people have seen
  them
   rising bodily into the air and going into 

[CTRL] More Drudge on Tina Brown Clown Posse

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

X DRUDGE REPORT X MONDAY JUNE 05 2000 18:34:22 ET X

CONTROVERSY SWIRLS AROUND DISNEY, TINA BROWN PROJECT; DIRT ON CLINTON
CRITICS EXPOSED

**Exclusive Update**

Late Monday Publisher's Row was buzzing about a controversial
project currently in the oven at Tina Brown's new book imprint.

The DRUDGE REPORT obtained a working manuscript of a book
commissioned by DISNEY's TALK/MIRAMAX -- a book that digs deep
into the private sex lives and business dealings of major and
minor Clinton critics!

Author John Connolly's work-in-progress has became the focus of
intense scrutiny at TALK.

Reached in New York, a startled Tina Brown refused direct
comment.

"Very little has been written on the personal lives of the people
who were behind the Lewinsky case," writes author John Connolly,
in a working introduction to THE INSANE CLOWN POSSE.

Connolly, spending the cash advanced to him by TALK, investigates
extramarital affairs by lawyers with ties to the Lewinsky
impeachment drama and the sexual orientation of staffers working
in the Office of the Independent Counsel ["Ken's Men"].

Details too hot, even for the web.

"This is a disgrace!" said a lawyer who has received Connolly's
undivided attention.

"And the fact that a DISNEY company, with Tina Brown, has
commissioned this witch hunt is unconscionable."

TALK/MIRAMAX book editor John Burnham confirmed on Monday that
Connolly is under contract to write CLOWN POSSE, but cautioned
that "no decisions have been made" about the book's eventual
content.


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Linda Tripp: Most Clinton Crimes Still Secret

2000-06-05 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

For the story behind the story...


Monday June 5, 2000; 12:24 AM EDT

Linda Tripp: Most Clinton Crimes Still Secret, More Monicas to Come

Speaking publicly for first time since the state of Maryland
dropped wiretapping charges against her, Clinton impeachment
witness Linda Tripp told a South Carolina gathering Saturday
night that most of the criminality she witnessed while working in
the White House has yet to be revealed.

"Most of the things that I know that were illegal that happened
in the Clinton White House I have not spoken about publicly or
under oath," the star witness told members of Free Republic.com,
the internet web site that organized the event.

The revelation sent shockwaves through the crowd.

Some of the still secret misconduct has to do with Vincent
Foster's death, Tripp seemed to suggest, about which she
testified before the Senate Whitewater Committee in 1995.

The onetime White House office manager and last person to see
Foster alive admitted to the Free Republic audience that she'd
been less than forthright in her previous testimony about the
case.

"Bear in mind that during that time Kirby Behre, my White
House-appointed private lawyer, was in constant touch with the
White House and I was told how to testify.  My caveat to that was
that I never lied under oath.  But I testified very, very
narrowly - truthfully but narrowly - and to my regret, not
completely."

Asked if she could elaborate now on what she knew about the
Foster case, Tripp begged off:

"It's probably not the appropriate time to talk about something
as involved as the Vince Foster case.  ...  There are a lot of
issues that need to be addressed, let's just put it that way."

Tripp also said that she expected other scandal witnesses to come
forward by the end of the year, including White House women who
had Lewinsky-like relationships with Clinton.

"I know of women who were in the same sort of relationship with
the president during the time that Monica was, and it's likely
that they may or may not choose to speak up down the road."

The key impeachment witness also challenged Lewinsky's claims
that she was merely joking when she told her friend on tape that
she was afraid of being killed over her affair with Clinton.

"There's an element of tension and fear in that White House,"
Tripp insisted.  "And it's not there for nothing.  We are not
imagining this. And when Monica Lewinsky said to me, 'I would not
cross these people for fear of my life,' she was not kidding."

"Ask all those people who dared disclose the truth about this
president about their experiences with Clinton attorney-paid
private investigators such as Terry Lenzner and Jack Palladino."

Tripp said that the first lady was behind the campaign to
neutralize witnesses.  "We have all been in the crosshairs of
Mrs.  Clinton, whose orchestration of the destruction [of
witnesses] is well known in the White House.  She calls the
shots.  She spearheads the strategy.  And she is in charge."

Tripp, who for a time had a West Wing office adjacent to Hillary
Clinton's, had words of warning about Clinton's U.S.  Senate
candidacy: "This is her ticket on her fast track back to the
White House.  New Yorkers need to pay attention."

Tripp said that she chose to accept Free Republic's invitation to
speak because its members had been so supportive throughout her
ordeal.  But she vowed to end her self-imposed silence, telling
the crowd, "If I continue to remain silent, they win."

Early in her address Tripp's newly aggressive strategy was on
display. Revealing the next move in her lawsuit against Pentagon
officials who leaked confidential information about her, Tripp
said, "In the next few weeks we'll be subpoenaing every national
name you can imagine in the White House."

Further angering Tripp: the Pentagon has agreed to pay for
private lawyers for the two officials who, the Justice Department
admits, broke the law when they leaked derogatory information on
Tripp to the press.

Despite the admission, there have been no indictments or even
dismissals.  "It's really up to the civil process to hold them
accountable," said the star impeachment witness.


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and 

[CTRL] The Korean War Atrocity Debate (Three stories on the evolution of the exposé)

2000-06-05 Thread lloyd

..

From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]:

From: Alex Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Korean War Atrocity Debate (Three stories on the evolution of the exposé)
Date: Sunday, May 28, 2000 7:08 PM

The Korean War Atrocity Debate
(Three stories on the evolution of the exposé)
___
Korean War 'Massacre' Story Not True

NewsMax,com
Friday, May 12, 2000 7:56 p.m. EDT

A Pulitzer Prize-winning Associated Press story about a massacre of
civilian refugees in the earliest day of the Korean War ó which was
picked up and spread by countless other media, provoking outrage here
and in Korea ó is not true, according to two hard-hitting investigative
reports out today.
Both U.S. News  World Reportand the magazine Stars and Stripes launched
investigations of the alleged massacre at the village of No Gun Ri and
discovered that the story was so riddled with gaping holes ó and that
several key "witnesses" cited by AP were not even there ó that its
credibility is practically nil.
Published on Sept. 30, 1999, the AP story charged that in June 1950,
when U.S. and South Korean forces were facing an onslaught by swiftly
advancing North Korean troops, American soldiers acting on orders from
their superior officers allegedly machine-gunned hundreds of helpless
South Korean civilians huddled under a railroad bridge near No Gun Ri.
The shocking story reverberated around the world, sparked an official
Army investigation of the alleged massacre and was reported in other
publications and on television, many of which added new details from
sources cited in the original report. NBC even had Tom Brokaw do a
special segment on the story.
As with CNN's sensational Tailwind story that suggested American
soldiers gassed Vietcong during the Vietnam War, most of the media
swallowed the No Gun Ri massacre story without questioning it or even
verifying accounts.
A Stars and Stripes investigation, however, uncovered startling new
information ó also uncovered by a wide-ranging investigative effort of
U.S. News ó that casts serious doubts about the massacre allegations and
convincingly impeaches the credibility of several individuals identified
by the Associated Press as key eyewitnesses. The U.S. News report is
hitting newsstands this weekend.
According to Stars and Stripes, the AP report "quoted several former
U.S. soldiers and South Korean survivors who said that members of the
2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, had fired on
and killed several hundred South Korean civilians over a three-day
period as they cowered inside a railroad-bridge culvert near No Gun Ri,
about 30 miles east-southeast of the city of Taejon in southern South
Korea.î
But according to declassified Army war diaries and other documents
obtained by Stars and Stripes from the National Archives and the
National Personnel Records Center, the two eyewitnesses identified by
the Associated Press were not with the battalion at the time the alleged
shootings took place.
Moreover, the unit that allegedly committed the massacre over a
three-day period was in the area for only a few hours, after which it
fled in disarray.
Here is how the Stars and Stripes described the AP story: "The
Associated Press report centered on three charges:
… "That the American soldiers were ordered by their officers to open
fire on all refugees attempting to cross the lines between the advancing
North Korean army and the U.S. defenses.
… "That the American soldiers ëdirected the refugees into the bridge
underpasses Ö and after dark opened fire on them from nearby machine-gun
positions,í as the AP reported. The soldiers ëkept the refugees pinned
under the bridge Ö and killed almost all of them.í
… "The killings took place over the three-day period of July 26-28,
1950.î
But the magazineís investigation discovered that:
  "The specific U.S. Army unit accused of carrying out the massacre of
the civilians at No Gun Ri over the three-day period of July 26-28,
1950, was H Company of the 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment. A
declassified war diary of the unit and the rest of the 2nd Battalion
arrived by convoy near No Gun Ri the day after the 7th Cavalry
Regiment's other two battalions had been attacked by the North Korean
army units moving east from Taejon.
… "The regimental war diaries and official U.S. Army history of the
Korean War make no mention of the unit being dug in at No Gun Ri for
three days, reporting only the evening march to the front lines at 6:50
p.m. and the panicked flight of the soldiers back down the valley about
seven hours later. Later entries for July 27 and 28 indicate the entire
regiment was in sporadic contact with the advancing North Korean army
and directed both artillery and air strikes against the enemy while
receiving direct tank fire and mortar fire and shifting its positions as
the situation required.
… "Daily and Flint ó the former GIs the AP report 

Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Ritalin Market Soars

2000-06-05 Thread Samantha L.

In a message dated 6/5/00 9:47:19 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

 The authors examined data from a 1979 survey of 30 Rochester, N.Y.-area
  pediatricians, and compared the results with 1996 data from a
  government-funded study of 395 pediatricians nationwide. A total of 21,065
  patients ages 4 to 15 were involved.


  I can't imagine how one can properly statistically correct for such varied
data populations.  Comparing Rochester to Rochester would work, but comparing
30 Rochester pediatricians' data to 395 pediatricians' data nationwide?
Harumph.  And this is what people call "science."

  The conclusions feed into the propaganda that tries to convince us that
this generation's young people are somehow "different" than previous
generations'.  Because these young people are "different" we can justify
drugging them into a stupor, trying them as adults, randomly searching them
at school, forcing them to pee in cups at tender ages.  Makes me sick.

Samantha

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Background checks stopped more than 200, 000 gun buys last year

2000-06-05 Thread tenebroust

Another good reason why we don't need more restrictive gun laws, and why, perhaps, we 
don't need more laws against anything.  The laws already on the books, if properly 
used are enough (and in some cases more than enough) to accomplish the goals for which 
they were written.


On Mon, 05 June 2000, Eagle 1 wrote:


 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
 HTMLHEAD
 META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type
 META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR
 STYLE/STYLE
 /HEAD
 BODY bgColor=#ff
 DIVFONT color=#80 size=2
 H2FONT size=2Could this mean that the system IS working?/FONT/H2
 DIVA
 
href="http://www.trib.com/HOMENEWS/WASH/GunChecks.html"http://www.trib.com/HOMENEWS/WASH/GunChecks.html/A/DIV
 DIV/DIV
 H2Background checks stopped more than 200,000 gun buys last year /H2By
 MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN
 PAssociated Press Writer
 PWASHINGTON (AP) - Background checks blocked 204,000 of the more than 8.6
 million prospective gun sales last year, according to a Justice Department
 report that shows state and local police rejected a higher percentage of
 would-be gun buyers than the FBI.
 PThe 1999 figures brought the number of purchase rejections since the Brady
 Act instituted background checks in February 1994 to 536,000 out of almost 22.3
 million applications, the department's Bureau of Justice Statistics reported.
 That confirmed earlier estimates of more than 500,000 rejections.
 PThe bureau's report provided the first hard numbers on the differences
 between checks by state and local police and those by the FBI.
 PThe FBI performed 4.5 million of the 8.6 million last year, compared with 4.1
 million by state and local agencies.
 PFONT size=3STRONGThe rejection rate among state and local agencies was 3
 percent, compared with 1.8 percent for the FBI. /STRONG/FONT
 PThe report attributed this difference to state agencies' access to more
 detailed criminal history records than the FBI's. In 1999, 73 percent of
 rejections were because would-be buyers had been convicted of or indicted on
 felony charges.
 PLast year, the report said, all state agencies had access to "computer
 databases that record past felony convictions, and many accessed databases with
 other disqualifying information such as fugitive status, court restraining
 orders, mental illness and domestic violence misdemeanor convictions."
 PThe Clinton administration long has argued that the states are better
 equipped than the FBI to do background checks, but some states have not wanted
 to pay the costs. Twenty-six states handle some or all their checks.
 PThe overall national rejection rate has remained 2.4 percent since 1994,
 despite the Nov. 30, 1998, switch to computerized instant checks and the
 addition then of checks on long-gun purchasers. Only handgun buyers were checked
 before.
 PA second statistics bureau report largely recapped data already released by
 the Justice Department during its debate with the National Rifle Association
 over gun controls during the past few months.
 PThe gun owners' group opposed President Clinton's gun control proposals and
 argued federal prosecutors were not enforcing existing gun laws. The
 administration said federal prosecutors were focusing on serious offenders and
 shifting smaller cases to state and local prosecutors and that combined gun
 prosecutions were up.
 PThe report said preliminary 1999 data showed 6,728 defendants were charged
 with federal firearms offenses, up from 6,287 in 1998. It also showed that
 between 1992 and 1997 the number of federal firearms defendants decreased 19
 percent, from 7,621 to 5,993.
 PThe report attributed part of this decline to the Supreme Court's 1995 Bailey
 vs. United States decision limiting prosecutors' ability to charge defendants
 with using a firearm during a violent or drug offense. It estimated that 2,500
 more defendants would have been charged with illegal gun possession between 1995
 and 1998 if the court had ruled differently.
 PThe bureau said prosecutors compensated by seeking longer sentences for
 weapon use.
 PIn a statement, Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder said that since 1992,
 combined state and federal gun prosecutions grew by more than 22 percent. When
 final data are assembled, "the number of people charged with federal gun crimes
 in 1999 should be equal to the number of people charged in 1992, even though
 there has been a dramatic drop in gun crimes during that period," Holder said.
 PHe also noted that the number of federal firearms offenders sentenced to more
 than five years in prison is up more than 41 percent, and the average sentence
 rose by almost two years between 1992 and 1998./P
 P /P
 PBRA
 
href="http://www.crayon.net/read.cgi?[EMAIL PROTECTED]"http://www.crayon.net/read.cgi?[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A/P/FONT/DIV
 DIVFONT color=#80
 
size=2+++BR+++/FONT/DIV
 DIV 

Re: [CTRL] UFO Operator's License on eBay LOL

2000-06-05 Thread Samantha L.

Just for fun:

http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=348992992
---

Samantha

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Fwd: The Price of Progress

2000-06-05 Thread [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 06/05/2000 9:07:41 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 `We already know that about half of us die of cardiopulmonary disease, 
#

Cardiopulmonary disease is the number one killer in the U.S.
but it wasn't always so.
Before 1910, heart and artery disease wasn't even a major cause of death.

Obviously something changed.
Something in the environment or some change in diet or nutrition changed.
What was it?

It wasn't because suddenly cities started having "smog".
In industrial cities there was a lot of factory smoke and particulates,
but not "smog" as it is constituted today with a lot of car exhaust fumes.
What was it?

At the time of World War I, major chemical companies
started producing large amounts of chlorine.
Chlorine is a highly poisonous gas.
It was used as a weapon in the war.
Starting about the time the war ended,
U.S. cities started using chlorine to kill bacteria in
public water supplies.
It worked.
Chlorine does kill germs.
But it also does something else.
Chlorine acts in combination with saturated fats
to produce a hard coating on the inside of arteries and
blood vessels.  This coating is called "plaque".
This causes "hardening of the arteries".
It's also called "Cardiopulmonary disease"
and/or atherosclerosis.

And now you know.the rest of the story.

 Regards to All
Nakano

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Was the Catholic Church Silent During the Holocaust?

2000-06-05 Thread Aleisha Saba

A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy




A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy



http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=2000/4/24/53743




[CTRL] Fwd: NewsMax.com: Inside Cover Story

2000-06-05 Thread Aleisha Saba

When I read this story, I remembered one other story about the great
humanitarian, Al Gore.

He had an old dog, who was not give proper care and was found lying on
his porch wounded and unattended.   Rather like this property destribed
in the followiong story - Al Gore, Slum Landlord.

If he treats his pets in this manner, and permits his property to be
labeled a "slum", well what would he do to America.   The fact that most
of the slum property is owned by people such as the Gores, is disgusting
enough.

Seems to me the Vice President should get out of he slum landlord
business, for you know, this is what is wrong with Americalook to
Flint, Michigan, where the little black kid murdered the little white
kid.  All living in poverty because the great NWO took away life from
what was once a great city which thrived...take a look at what you
and your NWO/UN cronies have doe to America, Mr. Gore.

George Bush Jr. - Go get him.   This Great Liberal Democrat Gore is a
symptom of what is wrong in America.


A Saba


Monday June 5, 2000; 5:25 PM EDT

Call from 'Slumlord' Gore Leaves Needy
Tenants in Tears

Vice President Al Gore called Tracy Mayberry Monday afternoon to say he
was mad at her for speaking to the press about his failure to make
repairs on the house she rents on Gore's Carthage, Tenn., farm. The call
left Mayberry's family in tears.

"I talked to Al Gore earlier and he really had me upset," Mayberry told
WABC-NY talk radio host Sean Hannity. "He said that I was talking really
bad about him and I haven't been. I just told the truth."

"I only called one news channel, that's all I called," complained
Mayberry. "Now he's trying to make out like I'm trying to slam him to
everybody and I'm not."

"The way I see it, you know, is that if he's going to yell at me and
say, 'Hey, you know, you slandered my name, you know, you were talking
bad about me,' I just prefer not to meet with him. I just prefer to go
on. I'm not going to be talked to like that and have my family crying
and upset and everything. It's not worth it to me."

Gore had been trying to make amends ever since Mayberry told a Nashville
TV station that the Veep hasn't done anything to fix the rundown
property after a year of complaints.

The plaster walls are crumbling, the plumbing doesn't work and the
floor's linoleum has worn away, Mayberry said.

After the Nashville TV station reported her plight, Gore contacted
Mayberry. "He called me Saturday all sweet and said he was going to move
me into another house, a comfortable house, until he can get this taken
care of."

But by Monday the Veep's accommodating mood had soured. "Today he called
and said, 'Well, I'll move you into a motel,' He was aggravated," said
Mayberry.

"He said I should have called him directly. And I said, 'How am I
supposed to call you directly? I don't have a phone number for you at
the White House.'"

Exasperated, Mayberry said she was ready to send her children to her
mother's house and spend the night in the family's truck with her
husband. They both have diabetes, he has heart disease, their 4-year-old
son has fetal alchohol syndrome, their 9-year-old daughter has a seizure
disorder and yet another daughter is mentally retarded.

Despite their many problems, the Mayberrys manage to get by on their
monthly $1536 Social Security check.

But it's landlord Gore that has Mrs. Mayberry at her wit's end. "I just
can't take it anymore. I'm just going to get out of here."

Read NewsMax.com's original report on the Gore 'slumlord' controversy

Inside Cover Stories

Call from 'Slumlord' Gore Leaves Needy Tenants in Tears

Hillary Booed Again

Linda Tripp: Most Clinton Crimes Still Secret,
More Monicas to Come

Lazio Gets Boost From DioGuardi

Clinton Favoring Missile Defense That Won't Stop Russian, Chinese Nukes

Gore Is 'Slumlord'
Summit Revelation: Putin Can Say 'Big Mac'
Report Clears Elian Raiders Despite Eyewitness Claims
More Inside Cover Stories
 Home  ·  Search  ·  Free E-mail News · ZipMax.com-Free Webmail
· Columnists · News Links · Late Night Jokes    Archives ·
Shopping Mall · Cartoons · Magazines · Forum · Classifieds ·
Contact Us  
  All Rights Reserved © NewsMax.com
 

A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy




A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy



http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2000/6/5/162827




Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Was the Catholic Church Silent During the Holocaust?

2000-06-05 Thread David Sutherland



NO!!!It actively 
PARTICIPATED!!!




- Original Message - 
From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 2:22 PM
Subject: [CTRL] Fwd: Was the Catholic Church Silent 
During the Holocaust?
 A. Saba Dare To Call It 
Conspiracy  


[CTRL] MARS RECORDS - Online book Table of Contents.

2000-06-05 Thread Nicky Molloy

 Online book.
MARS RECORDS

  http://www.themarsrecords.com/

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Photographs

Preface by Stephanie Relfe

Summary by Michael Relfe

Definitions of Healing Therapies Used
Deliverance
Understanding the Time Line
Chonological List Of Events
Visual Representation of Time Line
Clearing

A)Clearing Biofeedback Meter.
B) Acknowledgements.
C) The client is fully conscious throughout the session.
More on the Biofeedback Meter

The Mind

The File Clerk

To “As is”: How Negative Thoughts and Emotions are Cleared

The Language of the Clearing Biofeedback Meter:

Tone Arm (TA)
READS: Short Falls, Falls and Long Falls
Floating Needle
‘Yes’ and ‘No’
Rock Slam
Underlined v. not underlined words
Other Abbreviations
A summary of symbols used
Organisation of The Mars Records: Sessions  Chapters
Metabolism

Drugs

Repeating Technique

The Clearing Practitioner's Code of Ethics

Kinesiology

Emotional Stress Release
'The Wernicke’s Correction'

Session 1: Remembrance of Mars

Session 2: Killing with Remote Viewing

Session 3: Battle in Space

Session 4: Drugs in Restimulation

Session 5: An Untimely Death on the Hills of Mars

Session 6: Booby Traps against Memory Recall I

Session 7: Abiliity Blocking Device

Session 8: Remote Viewing on Mars

Session 9: Drugs to improve Psychic Abilities

Session 10: Family Upset I

Session 11: Pine Gap (Australia) Interference

Session 12: Family Upset II

Session 13: Super Learning I

Session 14: Super Learning II

Session 15: Eight Years Old

Session 16: Super Learning III

Session 17: ‘Booby Traps’ Against Remembering II

Session 18: Mind Control Commands I:Mind Control

Session 19: Wernicke’s Commands II: Health problems

Session 20: Casualties of Mars

Session 21: ‘Super Learning’ III

Session 22: Machines Amplify Abilities

Session 23: Erased Incident

Session 24: Airport Incident

Session 25: Suppressing Metaphysical Abilities

Session 26: Homestead Airforce Base USA

Session 27: Remote Viewing Practice

Session 28: Zero Time Reference Point

Chapter 29: An ‘Impossible’ Message from the Internet

Session 30: Scars Appear Overnight

Session 31: Wernicke’s Commands III: From the Military

Session 32: Energy Medicine Session

Session 33: Buffalo Bill’s Casino, Las Vegas

Session 34: Compartmentalised personalities

Session 35: Drugs and Reptilian Doctors

Session 36: Missouri and Reptilians

Session 37: A Blinding Headache

Session 38: Scars Again

Session 39: Wernicke’s Commands IV: Cause of Pain

Session 40: No result

Session 41: ‘Abduction’ to Homestead Airforce Base

Session 42: Kinesiology for Teeth

Session 43: Wernicke’s Commands V: Metaphysical Abilities

Session 44: Wernicke’s Commands VI: Theta Levels

Session 45: Blocks to Remote Viewing

Session 46: Wernicke’s Commands VIII: Sex

Session 47: Wernicke’s Commands IX: Memory Recall

Session 48: ‘Abduction’ in Dallas

Chapter 49: A Strange Accident – or not?

Session 50: Dental trauma

Session 51: Dental Trauma II

Session 52: Witchcraft

Session 53: ‘Abductions’ in Australia

Session 54: Time Travel in Dallas

Session 55: An Agreement with the Greys  the Military

Session 56: Checked Out by Greys on Mars

Session 57: PSI Training on Mars, Phase 1

Conclusion By Michael Relfe

Why are they doing this ?
Are you in danger from this book ?
What proof do you have?
What if no one believes ?
What do you think about what has happened to you ?
If you are a Christian, why has this happened to you ?
How can I be involved ?
Final Thoughts
Additional Request
Appendix 1: Easy Ways You Can Support This Project

Appendix II: Interview with Al Bielek 1990

Appendix III: Interview with Al Bielek 1991

Appendix IV: A Lecture By Phil Schneider: May 1995

Deep Underground Military Bases and the Black Budget
The Fire Fight At Dulce Base
Government Factions, Railroad Cars and Shackle Contracts
America's Black Program Contractors
Star Wars and Apparent Alien Threat
Stealth Aircraft Technology Use by U.S. Agencies and the U.N.
Guardians of Stealth and Delta Force: ‘The Bosnia Conflict
Bombings in the United States
The Truth Behind the Republican Contract With America
Statistics on the Black Helicopter Presence
Government Earthquake Device
AIDS as a Bioweapon Based on Alien Excretions
Appendix V: Phillip Schneider Investigation

Why Phil Schneider went Public
Appendix VI: Deliverance  Spiritual Warfare

Excerpt: from Moody Deliverance Manual
Warfare Prayers and Deliverance by Win Worley
Beginning Deliverance Session
Ending Deliverance Session
Further Notes by Michael Relfe:
Praying for protection
Prayers against aliens
Appendix VII: How to Do the Wernicke’s Correction

Appendix VIII: More about Kinesiology:

The only symptoms of disease
The Cloacals
Appendix IX: Biography of Stephanie Relfe

Appendix X: To Learn More About Clearing  Kinesiology

Appendix XI: ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

CLEARING
KINESIOLOGY
DELIVERANCE
ADVANCED SCIENCE  TECHNOLOGY
MIND CONTROL
REMOTE VIEWING
Appendix XII: BIBLIOGRAPHY

Appendix XIII: REFERENCES

A 

[CTRL] Kali Worshippers? I wonder......

2000-06-05 Thread Aleisha Saba

Time Magazine years ago had an article, and this would have been in the
1968 time frame, where the indicated Kali Worshippers, or those involved
in secret societies of assassins, had been involved the the murder of
the Kennedys and Martin Luther King.

When you stop and think about it, are we heading into a 60 period again
only this time are Bill and Hilliary Clinton leading and instigating
mass murders in order to keep in power.  Note I say in power, for often
neither have authority for what they do.

When I first read this article, I thought of it and read it again.
Someone sees something here I believe most of us have missed.

**
The Clinton Body Bag Count:  Is this what it takes to keep them in
power?   Why is Africa, both white farmers and black employees, being
led to slaughterwhy is Africa starving and why do they die?  Rhodes
Roundtable packed up their diamonds and left?  Keeping in mind, Clinton
was Rhodes Scholar?


Return to The New Australian

US
    Report
   Telling it like it is

Hillary: the American Kali
By James Henry

 No. 155,   6 - 18 June 2000

I wrote a short time ago (No. 150, 3-9 April) the more blacks and
Hispanics that end up on morgue slabs as a result of violence the
happier Hillary's dedicated supporters will be, particularly in the
media. After all, I added, Hillary Clinton is a "race demagogue who will
ruthlessly use dead blacks and Hispanics as stepping stones to the White
House." That grim reality is coming to pass each day as New York's body
count rises. The irony, however, is that Giuliani's sudden departure
from the scene and Lazio's equally sudden appearance has changed the
political landscape in away that is totally unfavorable to Hillary Kali.
(Kali is the Hindu goddess of destruction. She was also worshipped by
the murderous Thuggee sect. Adorned with skulls she is fitting company
for those who callously use the deaths of others to further their
political ambitions.)

Painting Lazio as a neo-Fascist brute intent on waging war against New
York's minorities is going to be an impossible task for Hillary's
forces. The reason is the Wendy's massacre. This atrocity, for which 2
black thugs are accused of systematically murdering 2 blacks and 3
Hispanics, has served to highlight what every thoughtful New Yorker,
regardless of politics, knows: It is the criminals in their midst that
minorities have to fear, not the police.

That the swift rise in the murder rate quickly followed Hillary's
campaigning is no coincidence. Without the slightest regard for the
consequences she launched a vicious antipolice campaign which her media
allies remorselessly supported. Thanks to her charges of police
brutality, which law abiding citizens like Al Sharpton and progressive
pillars of the community like The New York Times upheld, the Street
Crimes Unit was abolished.

The predictable response to this product of liberal demagoguery was a
rise in the murder rate. Freed from the fear of sudden apprehension by
the Street Crimes Unit low-life predators are once again prowling the
Bronx and Queens, though not, unfortunately, the well-kept streets in
which Hillary and her media supporters live.

The murderous consequences of Hillary Kali's callousness are revealing
themselves in bloodless statistics. From 31 December 1993 to 31 December
1998 New York's murder rate dove by 68 percent. Last year it rose by 6
percent and the first quarter of this year saw it jump by 12.4 percent.
This appalling trend is only to expected considering her campaign of
psychological warfare against NYPD has forced it to exercise excessive
caution in dealing with suspects and known criminals. No wonder there
has been a significant fall in arrests for major crimes, including rape
and murder. Only an ardent Hillary disciple would be unable to make the
connection.

While Rupert Murdoch's New York Post estimated Giuliani's tough
anticrime campaign saved the lives of 2,299 black New Yorkers the
liberal media (meaning left-wing reporters and commentators) marched in
ideological lockstep behind Hillary's campaign machine. It is becoming
more and more evident with each passing day that New York's media has
become a willing extension of Hillary Kali's political ambitions.

The election of Hillary Clinton would finally see the death of Common
Decency and a further decline in the Rule of Law. As this realization
slowly dawns on the more sentient of our citizens the surreal-like
situation of hundreds of New Yorkers demonstrating for a police policy
that will kill some of them, and already has, will come to be seen for
what it really is: cynical political manipulation by callous Democrats.

Visit The Media Wall of Shame and discover just how anti-American Rupert
Murdoch's Australian journalists really are.
Return to The New Australian

A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy




A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy



http://www.newaus.com.au/USReport.html