[CTRL] CST: Smell of vote fraud lingers

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.suntimes.com/output/osullivan/osul27.html

Chicago Sun-Times
February 27, 2001

Smell of vote fraud lingers

BY JOHN O'SULLIVAN


`Legitimate at last--Mother will be pleased," wrote Noel Coward
to Gertrude Lawrence when the musical comedy star made her first
Broadway appearance in a serious drama. And Karen Hughes, the
president's press secretary, might be forgiven if she had
attached a similar note to President Bush's morning press digest
Monday, directing him to the Miami Herald's story on the results
of its own recount of last November's "undervotes" in Florida.

This showed that Al Gore would have gained only 49 net votes in
Miami-Dade County even if a very liberal interpretation of voting
intentions had been in force--far short of the 600 votes that the
Gore camp had estimated in the post-election skirmishing. When
added to similarly modest gains for Gore in the three other
counties where his team had requested recounts, the former vice
president still would have lagged 140 votes behind Bush in
Florida's total vote.

All in all, the president would be fully justified in demanding
that Terry MacAuliffe, the new Democratic National Committee
chairman; the Rev. Jesse Jackson; U.S. Civil Rights Commission;
its chairman, Mary Berry, and assorted liberal pundits and
political consultants should add their concession speeches to
Gore's and grudgingly concede that Bush is the legitimate
president.

They are unlikely to do so, however. The U.S. Civil Rights
Commission still is trying to uncover evidence that minority
voters were either discouraged from voting or saw their votes for
Gore discarded. Democrats seemingly believe that they have a
potent electoral issue in such voter "intimidation."

So it is hard to understand the GOP silence over another aspect
of the recent election that disadvantages the GOP--namely,
deliberate voter fraud. Yet as the Miami Herald carried out its
investigations into ballot inefficiency, it also uncovered more
and more evidence that votes were cast illegally in numbers that
overwhelm "undervotes."

On Jan. 22, the Herald reported that at the very least 2,000
illegal votes had been cast in about a third of Florida's
counties--very roughly 6,000 for the state as a whole. On Jan. 9,
it revealed that 452 felons had voted unlawfully in Broward
County alone. Election officials cheerfully admitted ignoring the
electoral rules, allowing people to vote without evidence of
identity, registration, domicile, citizenship or even breath in
their bodies. Most of these votes seem to have gone to Gore.

If this had been confined to Florida, it would have been scandal
enough. But as Karen Saranita of the California-based Institute
for Fair Elections points out, electoral fraud is found across
the United States, usually in the large urban areas but not
confined to them. Baltimore, Philadelphia, New Orleans, Los
Angeles and Miami all have had voter fraud scandals in recent
years.

The drift of current policy is toward making such theft easier.
As National Review's Rich Lowry pointed out in a 1996 article,
the Motor Voter Law imposes fraud-friendly rules on the states--
it permits mail-in registration, forbids government workers to
challenge new registrants, makes it exceedingly difficult to
purge "deadwood" voters (i.e. those who have died or moved away),
and so on. This permits such absurdities as the fact that the
1994 assassin of the Mexican presidential candidate Luis Donaldo
Colosio was illegally registered to vote in San Pedro, Calif.--
twice!

If the GOP has any survival instinct, however, it will actively
campaign to halt voter fraud--and the rules that make it easy.
Otherwise it will earn the contemptuous obituary given to the
high-minded British political failure Austen Chamberlain by one
of his more vigorous colleagues: "Poor Austen. He always played
the game--and he always lost it."


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

[CTRL] AP: BG: Boston INS audit finds many criminals approved for citizenship

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

[Boston Globe version follows]

http://www.nandotimes.com/nation/story/0,1038,500458303-500697233-503775629-
0,00.html

Boston INS audit finds many criminals approved for citizenship

The Associated Press

BOSTON (February 28, 2001 12:01 p.m. EST
http://www.nandotimes.com) - The government may have let
thousands of immigrants with criminal backgrounds become
naturalized citizens in Massachusetts, due in part to pressure
from above to reduce a backlog of citizenship requests.

Immigration and Naturalization Service memos obtained by the
Boston Globe show an internal audit of the Boston office,
conducted in 1998, found an average of five out of every 30
immigrants approved for citizenship had criminal records, and 16
percent had been convicted of a crime not known to the FBI.

Data about other states was not included in the Globe's report.

In all, the Boston office naturalized 21,052 citizens in 2000,
compared to 5,923 in 1990, the Globe reported Wednesday.

The Globe said the pressure was partly a byproduct of a
now-disbanded 1996 Clinton administration initiative aimed at
reducing the citizenship application backlog.

Because of pressure to reduce the backlog, agents check criminal
backgrounds with the FBI but normally don't review state criminal
records, the Globe reported. However, the audit found that felons
from Massachusetts don't always show up on FBI records.

Under INS policy, all people applying for citizenship submit to a
10-finger print, which is sent to the FBI to check for matches,
but many police departments in Massachusetts don't send prints to
the FBI, so those felons don't show up on FBI checks, according
to INS Special Agent Thomas Carroll, a quality control officer,
who wrote the memo obtained by the Globe. He declined to comment
on it.

Steven Farquharson, district director of the Boston INS office,
said that after receiving Carroll's audit he sent a memo to INS
headquarters asking for guidance, but he told the Globe the
response several months later said he was not allowed to use
other databases.

Russell Bergeron, spokesman for INS headquarters, said the fault
lies with the FBI for not requiring all police departments to
file fingerprints and with the departments themselves for not
sending them.

A Department of Justice investigation of the Citizenship USA
program concluded last summer that the flaws in the program were
the result of an agency that is "a mess" with systemic problems,
including poor criminal history background checks, that date back
decades.

In the national program's granting of citizenship to 1.2 million
people, the investigation found that a number of people with
criminal histories became citizens.


http://www.globe.com/dailyglobe2/059/nation/Many_with_records_said_to_slip_b
y_INSP.shtml

Many with records said to slip by INS Failure to check with state
at issue

By Cindy Rodriguez, Globe Staff, 2/28/2001


 flaw in the criminal background checking system used by the
regional office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service may
have allowed thousands of immigrants convicted of crimes to
become naturalized citizens in violation of federal law.


INS memos obtained by the Globe reveal that an internal audit
conducted in 1998 found an average of five out of every 30
immigrants approved for citizenship by the INS's Boston office
had criminal records. Although the exact nature of the offenses
remains unclear, one applicant cited in the audit had passed a
criminal background check even though he had been convicted of
assaulting a police officer.


Yet, the same office continues to process people using the flawed
system, under which agents check criminal backgrounds with the
FBI, but normally don't review state records that include
additional felons.


The loophole is partly a byproduct of a Clinton administration
initiative to reduce the often years-long wait for citizenship
faced by many immigrants. Under fire from Congress and the White
House to reduce the application backlog, INS created a
''numerical target'' system that, sources say, keeps officers who
process the applications in a constant frenzy.


''There was a lot of pressure to meet our goals. We had a quota
to meet,'' said an INS source who requested anonymity.


Administrators ask officers to work long days, and they pull in
staff from other departments, all in an effort to meet goals that
have taken the regional office from naturalizing 5,923 citizens
in 1990 to 21,052 in 2000.


If the 1998 audits are typical of people applying for US
citizenship in Boston, more than 3,000 of the candidates approved
in 2000 alone could have had criminal records. The random check
in 1998 found that 16 percent of applicants had been convicted of
a crime not known to the FBI.


Steven Farquharson, district director of the Boston office,
admits that the current processing glitch continues to allow some
felons to escape detection - but he says he can't do anything
about it.


''I certainly am concerned 

[CTRL] NYT: Tony Rodham got a pardon for his client, a Hillary contributor

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/01/politics/01PARD.html?pagewanted=all


March 1, 2001


A Clinton In-Law Helped Win Pair of Pardons, Despite Justice
Dept. Wishes

By MARC LACEY and DON VAN NATTA Jr.


WASHINGTON, Feb. 28 - Former President Bill Clinton's
brother-in-law Tony Rodham helped obtain a presidential pardon
for a Tennessee couple last March over the objections of the
Justice Department, Mr. Rodham and lawyers involved in the pardon
said today.

Mr. Clinton pardoned Edgar Allen Gregory Jr. and his wife, Vonna
Jo. The Gregorys, who live outside Nashville and own United Shows
of America, a carnival company based in Smyrna, Tenn., were
convicted of bank fraud in 1982 amid allegations that they had
used the assets of a bank they owned to give loans to friends.
They were placed on probation. The pardon frees them of the
consequences of a felony conviction.

The couple are also major campaign campaign contributors to both
Democrats and Republicans, and they contributed to the Senate
campaign of Hillary Rodham Clinton, Tony Rodham's sister.

In an interview tonight, Mr. Rodham acknowledged that he had
asked the president to pardon Mr. and Mrs. Gregory, but he said
he received no payment for his efforts. But Mr. Rodham does have
a financial tie to the Gregorys and has worked as a consultant
for Mr. Gregory for about seven years, helping him buy radio
stations and expand his carnival business.

In interviews tonight, neither Mr. Rodham nor Mr. Gregory would
disclose the terms of their financial relationship.

"I told him about Ed Gregory," Mr. Rodham said of his
conversation with Mr. Clinton, adding it was the only pardon
application he had mentioned to the president. "I didn't push. I
told the president about Ed Gregory and that he had applied for a
pardon. He's what the pardon process is all about."

Mr. Clinton pardoned the Gregorys on March 15, 2000. Although
this was months before the controversial batch of pardons he
approved on his last day in office, the clemency for the Gregorys
attracted criticism inside the Clinton administration because
lawyers at the Justice Department strongly opposed it.

Mr. Clinton's late flurry of pardons on Jan. 20 included two for
which Hugh Rodham, Tony Rodham's brother was paid $400,000, which
he later returned. They also included one for fugitive financier
Marc Rich.

The pardons have drawn criticism because they were approved at
the White House, without substantial involvement by the Justice
Department and sometimes over the objections of government
lawyers.

House and Senate committees, as well as federal prosecutors in
New York, are investigating the scores of pardons and
commutations that Mr. Clinton granted on his final day in the
White House. As part of that review, investigators are also
looking at earlier grants of clemency in the Clinton presidency.

Asked about Mr. Clinton's pardons for the Gregorys, Julia Payne,
a spokeswoman for the former president, said tonight that they
were approved on the merits.

"The president has said many, many people advocated pardons
directly to him. But the president determines to grant or deny a
pardon based on the merits," Ms. Payne said.

Mr. Rodham is the third Clinton relative to be involved in pardon
decisions. His brother, was hired by two people who obtained
clemency in January. He returned nearly $400,000 in payments for
his work on two clemency applications. Mr. Clinton's half
brother, Roger, urged the president to pardon six people. Their
applications were rejected, former Clinton aides said.

Mr. Gregory said his and his wife's applications for pardons had
languished for nearly 18 months at the Justice Department. When
Mr. Clinton failed to grant them in December 1999, Mr. Gregory
said he asked Mr. Rodham for his help.

"The only thing I ever said to Tony Rodham about the pardon is,
`Tony, we've applied for the pardon, and if you can help us in
any way, we'd really appreciate it,' " Mr. Gregory said.

Several people involved in the pardon process said Mr. Rodham had
referred to his success in helping the Gregorys gain pardons in
persuading others that he had White House influence in pardon
decisions. Mr. Rodham denied this. Mr. Rodham did play an active
role in helping Mr. Gregory's company get the opportunity to
erect a carnival on the White House lawn in June 1998.

"I got a call from Tony that his sister was interested in having
an old-fashioned carnival outside the White House and putting
some rides up there, and he asked if we were interested," Mr.
Gregory said.

Former Clinton aides said that two carnival companies were
considered and that Mr. Gregory's company offered to donate more
services than the rival company.

The Justice Department's recommendation against pardons for the
Gregorys was based in part on the opposition of the United States
attorney who prosecuted the case and the sentencing judge,
officials said. The recommendation was a "no brainer," one
official said.

The negative 

[CTRL] COULTER: Mary Jo White-wash

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac20010301.shtml


Ann Coulter
March 1, 2001

Mary Jo White-wash


While ostentatiously pursuing an "investigation" of the Marc Rich
pardon (which will lead precisely nowhere), Mary Jo White, the
U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, has
stubbornly refused to indict top Democratic and union officials
directly implicated in a money-laundering scheme uncovered by her
own office some years ago.

In what is now called the Teamsters Swap Scandal, prosecutors
working for Mary Jo White won three guilty pleas from top
Teamsters aides back in 1997. Two years later, the Teamsters'
former political director, William Hamilton, was convicted for
his role in the kickback scheme. But for four years now, the Big
Kahunas implicated in the money-swap operation have been largely
forgotten by White's office. One big fish studiously ignored by
Ms. White is the current chairman of the Democratic National
Committee and Clinton pal, Terry McAuliffe.

At the center of the money-laundering scheme was Ron Carey, who
had been anointed Teamsters president by "the most ethical
administration in history" as part of an ingenious plan to "clean
up" the Teamsters. When Teamsters legacy James Hoffa Jr. later
challenged Carey for the union presidency in 1996, Carey's aides
-- and perhaps Carey himself -- decided to give the Carey
campaign a boost using general union funds.

As was proved by the government, both in oversight and criminal
investigations, the Carey campaign repeatedly arranged for the
Teamsters to make huge contributions to various liberal and
Democratic groups, and then those groups would funnel the money
right back -- not to the Teamsters, but to the Carey campaign.
This is on the order of the IRS commissioner using tax revenues
to buy himself a Porsche.

After sitting on evidence for four years that implicated Carey,
the tough-talking Ms. White finally indicted him only days after
George W. Bush was sworn in as president. But even a Republican
in the White House hasn't prompted Clinton-appointed White to
blink in her intractable refusal to pursue McAuliffe.

This is somewhat startling inasmuch as White's own office adduced
testimony during the Hamilton trial naming McAuliffe as a party
to the money-laundering operation. Democratic Party official
Richard Sullivan testified that his former boss, Terry McAuliffe,
outlined a plan to him that would allow the Democratic National
Committee to participate in the Teamsters' evidently well-known
kickback scheme. Sullivan said that McAuliffe told him the
Democratic Party would be rewarded with up to a million dollars
in campaign contributions from the Teamsters if the Democrats
could find someone to donate $100,000 to the Carey campaign.

(Though completion of the scheme is not required for a criminal
offense, the Teamsters came through with their quid. The donor
located by the Democrats for their quo backed out at the last
minute.)

Though Sullivan later told Senate investigators he did not view
this arrangement as money laundering but rather as a way to "help
raise money from the union," Sen. Arlen Specter informed Mr.
Sullivan that he was using language that "is the equivalent of a
quid pro quo."

After Sullivan's shocking trial testimony, even The New York
Times was forced to admit that Sullivan's description of
McAuliffe's role was "troubling." While trying to mitigate the
force of Sullivan's testimony by incorrectly claiming that he had
been given a "no-prosecution" deal from the prosecutor
(correction issued 10 days later), the Times referred vaguely to
"some judgment calls" that Mary Jo White was going to have to
make with regard to McAuliffe. An indictment seemed imminent.

That was in 1999. We're still waiting. Indeed, according to
McAuliffe's lawyer, Richard Ben-Veniste, McAuliffe was given
"assurances" three years ago from Mary Jo White's office that he
"was not a target of the investigation."

Meanwhile, three other Democratic or union officials have given
sworn statements to Senate investigators also fingering McAuliffe
as a player in the Teamsters' money-swap scandal.

Not only that, but the three Carey campaign aides who pleaded
guilty to felonies back in 1997 still have not been sentenced.
Federal judges do not normally wait more than three years to
sentence felons -- unless the U.S. attorney has requested that
sentencing be delayed.

Why is Mary Jo White blocking their sentencing?

Prosecutors will sometimes request that sentencing be deferred
when a convict is cooperating so that the full extent of the
cooperation can be known by the court prior to sentencing. But
four years is enough time to have these guys describe the history
of the world since the Earth cooled -- to say nothing of a simple
money-laundering scheme. Either McAuliffe was involved or he
wasn't. Does Ms. White need four years to ask the convicted
Teamsters aides that?

It took Al Gore's defeat to get an indictment of Ron 

[CTRL] AP: Another Day, Another Clinton Aide Peddling Influence

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

Another Day, Another Clinton Aide Peddling Influence

Wednesday, February 28, 2001

By PETE YOST
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - A former Clinton administration aide drew on
his White House ties in seeking presidential clemency for his
cousin, whose prison term for laundering money for Colombian drug
traffickers was commuted on Bill Clinton's last day in office.

David Dreyer, a partner in a Washington communications firm, said
Tuesday that he spoke about three times last year to White House
chief of staff John Podesta and once to White House lawyer Beth
Nolan about the case of Harvey Weinig, a New York City lawyer.

Podesta called Dreyer on Jan. 20 to say that President Clinton
had commuted Weinig's sentence, Dreyer said.

Weinig was sentenced in 1996 to 11 years in prison for laundering
tens of millions of dollars in drug proceeds and failing to
report a kidnapping.

With the commutation, Weinig is scheduled to be released from
federal prison April 16. He will have served over five years.

Last summer, Weinig's family "asked me to help; I took the
information to people I knew in connection with my White House
service and I let them know I cared about Harvey," said Dreyer,
who was deputy White House communications director from 1993 to
1995 and then spent two years at the Treasury Department.

Dreyer said the Weinig family was "floored" in 1995 because they
felt the prison term was much longer than warranted and Weinig's
sentence was longer than that of other defendants in the case.

Washington attorney Reid Weingarten began exploring the
possibility of a commutation about a year ago, filing an
application with the Justice Department's pardon attorney. The
Justice Department on Tuesday declined to say what the pardon
attorney recommended.

"I met with Reid and he gave me a three-ring binder on Harvey's
case that was going through the pardon attorney," said Dreyer,
who presented the cover memo from the binder to Podesta.

After Weinig's name didn't turn up among Clinton's pre-Christmas
commutations, "I called John Podesta and he said it was still
under consideration," Dreyer said.

Dreyer said he spoke briefly to Nolan about the case at a White
House staff party.

Podesta's office on Tuesday declined comment, referring to his
comments Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Podesta said then that he recommended the Weinig commutation "on
humanitarian grounds. ... It was done on the basis of a
humanitarian plea that was made to us by someone we knew who had
rendered good public service."

U.S. prosecutors said Weinig was one of the heads of a major
international ring operating in New York and other cities,
including in Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Puerto Rico and
Colombia.

Alfonso Valdivieso, Colombia's United Nations ambassador who as
top prosecutor during the mid-1990s oversaw efforts to put drug
traffickers behind bars, called Clinton's action "sordid."

"This gives us the notion that the anti-drug fight is
asymmetrical," former Foreign Minister Rodrigo Pardo said of
Weinig's commutation. "The United States demands more from
Colombia than it is disposed to do itself."

Colombian President Andres Pastrana met with President Bush in
Washington on Tuesday to discuss U.S. support for drug-fighting
programs in the world's largest cocaine-producing nation. The
Weinig commutation didn't come up, said a senior Bush
administration official who briefed reporters on condition of
anonymity.


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL 

[CTRL] LAT: Grand jury impaneled to look into Rich pardon

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-


From the Los Angeles Times

Grand jury impaneled to look into Rich pardon

By Richard A.Serrano and Stephen Braun
Times Staff Writers
Published February 27 2001, 9:07 PM EST


WASHINGTON -- Prosecutors in New York have convened a federal
grand jury to begin collecting potential evidence for their
investigation of the pardon of fugitive commodities broker Marc
Rich.

The jury already has issued subpoenas and is collecting the
fund-raising “lists and documents” for Bill Clinton's
presidential library -- a clear sign that they are looking for
evidence of a quid pro quo between the Rich pardon and donations
to the former president.

= Separately, federal prosecutors in Minneapolis have asked the
= Justice Department for advice on whether they should open a
= grand jury investigation into Clinton's commutation for Carlos
= Vignali of Los Angeles.  Vignali, a convicted drug dealer, was
= released after a lobbying campaign by Southern California
= elected officials and $200,000 in fees paid to Clinton's
= brother-in-law, Hugh Rodham.

The New York investigation was begun after Mary Jo White, the
U.S.  attorney there, expressed dismay over Clinton's last-minute
pardon of Rich.  The involvement of a grand jury means that
prosecutors may believe they can develop enough evidence to
secure a criminal indictment in the pardon scandal that has
tarnished Clinton's legacy since he left the White House on Jan.
20.

= Federal prosecutors in New York declined to comment Tuesday about
= the scope of their probe.  But the fact that a grand jury has
= been impaneled allows them to use it as a vehicle to review
= other pardons that Clinton granted in cases originating there.

Those include clemencies for four Hassidic Jews convicted of
bilking tens of millions of dollars from the government, and
Harvey Weinig, who was sentenced to 11 years in prison for
laundering $19 million for a Colombian drug cartel.

Clinton pardoned 15 people whose cases originated from White's
district in New York.

The former president's lawyer, David E.  Kendall, confirmed the
grand jury's probe when he advised congressional investigators
Tuesday that they may have to wait to see the library
foundation's records until after the grand jury completes its
review.

“The foundation is in the process of complying with a subpoena
issued by a grand jury of the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York,” Kendall wrote in a letter to
the House Government Reform Committee, and will produce “lists of
and documents pertaining to all persons who have given or pledged
to the foundation an amount in excess of $5,000.”

Denise Rich, the fugitive's ex-wife, has donated $450,000 to the
foundation and more than $1 million to the Democratic Party.
Prosecutors as well as congressional investigators want to know
if any of that money actually came from Marc Rich, who has lived
outside the country since 1983.

Foreign money is prohibited from U.S.  political campaigns.

One way to sort that out is to examine the divorce settlement
between Marc and Denise Rich, which might show how likely it is
that she alone could afford to contribute such large sums of
money.

Meanwhile, Marc Rich refused to testify before the House panel or
provide any documents related to his pardon effort -- becoming
the third person to turn the committee down after his ex-wife and
her friend, former Democratic Party fund-raiser Beth Dozoretz,
each invoked the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination.

Also Tuesday, Clinton waived executive privilege for three of his
top White House aides in preparation for their testimony Thursday
before the House Government Reform Committee.

Scheduled to testify are former Clinton Chief of Staff John
Podesta, former White House Counsel Beth Nolan and Bruce Lindsey,
a longtime Clinton confidant and White House adviser.


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

[CTRL] Slaughter of the innocuous

2001-03-01 Thread Kelly

-Caveat Lector-

The Times

 THURSDAY MARCH 01 2001

 Slaughter of the innocuous

 BY ABIGAIL WOOD

 Foot-and-mouth is as serious to animals as a bad cold is to human
 beings. So why the concern?

 Foot-and-mouth has gained a grip on this nation — and fear of the
 disease seems as powerful as the disease itself. We recognise
 foot-and-mouth not by its symptoms, but by what we do to control it:
 the restrictions on movement, the slaughter of animals, the burning of
 carcasses. From the panic and the headlines you would imagine that
 this is a most dreadful disease. Yet foot-and-mouth very rarely kills
 the animals that catch it. They almost always recover, and in a couple
 of weeks at that. It almost never gets passed on to humans and when it
 does it is a mild infection only. The meat from animals that have had
 it is fit to eat. In clinical terms, foot-and-mouth is about as
 serious, to animals or to people, as a bad cold.

 Why, then, the concern? And why the policy of wholesale slaughter? The
 concern, of course, is economic. This is a financial issue, not an
 animal welfare issue, nor a human health one. No one abroad will take
 our meat if it might be infected with foot-and-mouth. And that
 worldwide exclusion zone stems from British policies of the past. It
 was we who, in the late 19th century, decided that foot-and-mouth
 should not be lived with, but should be eliminated, shut out through
 the cordon sanitaire; it was we, in the 1950s, who encouraged first
 the Continent, then the rest of the world, into following suit. Now it
 is we who must live with the results of that policy.

 Foot-and-mouth disease does reduce the productivity of an animal: its
 milk yield, its rate of putting on of flesh. There are no figures for
 how much it reduces these things; part of the reason for that is that
 no one since the 1920s in Britain has seen the disease take its full
 course. Any animal infected with it has been immediately slaughtered
 That reduction in productivity, that fear of small economic loss, is
 what lies behind the elimination policy — and the huge economic costs
 that are now being incurred.

 It need not have been like that. The animal control policy was the
 result of economics rather than biology. Under conditions of world
 trade now it is a decision almost impossible to reverse.

 Foot-and-mouth first appeared in Britain in 1839 from the import of
 live infected animals and later from ships, from dockyards, from
 Argentinian meat and skins, even from foreign hay. For much of the
 19th century it was endemic in the UK — and it did not destroy
 farming. Farmers lived with it, as they live with bad weather, poor
 harvests and other afflictions of their livelihood.

 It was owners of pedigree herds, rather than common-or-garden milk or
 meat producers, who from 1869 prompted efforts to eradicate it. It was
 achieved by isolation, by movement restrictions, by temporary closures
 of markets and by prohibition of live imports — but not by
 slaughtering. By 1900, Britain was disease-free — but was subject to
 waves of re-introductions of foot-and-mouth from the Continent and
 from South American meat. Outbreaks, and now slaughters as well as
 isolations, were frequent; but familiarity made them more of an
 irritant than the terror we have today.

 A policy of living with foot-and-mouth almost became an option again
 in the 1920s. A bad outbreak in Cheshire was on the verge of running
 out of control.Ministry teams were so far behind in their slaughtering
 that on many farms the cows had recovered from the disease before the
 slaughterers arrived. And farmers looked at their now-normal cows in
 bewilderment and asked: “Was that it? Was that rather trivial illness
 what all the fuss was about?” Not surprisingly, they began to question
 the need for slaughter.

 Even the Ministry of Agriculture, now wedded to the policy of
 slaughter, was pressured into taking heed of farmers’ views, and even
 asked them which policy they would prefer, elimination or toleration.
 It even went to a vote. But by that time burnings had got on top of
 the disease, and the vote, though close, was to continue measures of
 eradication.

 This was the last time that people saw the full course of the illness.
 Memories of what a slight disease it was began to fade. The biggest
 outbreak in our history, in 1967-68, is the one that lingers in
 present memories, and memory of those days fuels the grim processes we
 now see.

 A policy of living with foot-and-mouth might have worked in the 1920s,
 and had we adopted it we would not be witness to the present scenes.
 But in those days productivity was not the be-all and end-all that it
 is now. So many diseases were around that a farmer was happy if his
 animals survived to give milk and meat at all. The rate at which they
 gave milk and meat was much less important.

 Today, agri-business is a term that everyone knows, and productivity
 is everything. A slower growth-rate, a 

Re: [CTRL] Moon Landing A Hoax?

2001-03-01 Thread Aleisha Saba

-Caveat Lector-

So June I have had the biggest insult levied against me as of
late..C. of BooHoo believes you and I are the same person, for you
see I had become as foul mouthed as you.

So I am sorry for the language I used - and June I am glad you are okay
- I understoodo you had been killed off by a sonic boom.

You and C of BooHoo should get together for I believe you two would get
along fabulously.

Sincerely,

Saba aka June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Bleak Future For Both Palestinians and Israelis

2001-03-01 Thread Aleisha Saba

Has Zionism succeeded in destroying domestic jews and arab moslems?
Holy Land has become like another Viet Nam?   cui bono?
Where are the Israelies getting the billions of dollars of diamonds they
alleged were mined?
Stealing from Sudan per courtesy of Clinton cannibals?




   ___      __
  /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
 / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\ Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\http://www.MiddleEast.Org

  News, Information,  Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
 and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
  IF YOU DON'T GET MER, YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!
 To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



   BLEAK FUTURE FOR BOTH PALESTINIANS AND ISRAELIS

MID-EAST REALITIES  - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 3/01:
   Shimon Peres has many secrets to try to keep, and that explains his desperation
to stay in power practically at any cost.  Ariel Sharon knows this.
   Yasser Arafat has many secrets to keep, and that also explains his desperation
to stay in power practically at any cost.  And Ariel Sharon also knows this.
   Everything is likely to get still worse for the Palestinian people -- soon.
 The collapse, impoverishment, imprisonment, and despair now taking place is
the price of so many years of ineptitude and corruption at the top.  Anarchy
and internal shake-downs are no positive substitute for principled and dignified
leadership which have been desperately needed for so many years now.
   And much will also likely get worse for the Israeli people -- but not so
soon.  The facism, militarism, cockiness, and racism now more evident than
ever when it comes to Israeli ways is the result of so many years of self-deception
and brutality coming from the top.  Stretching these black behaviours even
more through a Sharon led "unity government" is no positive substitute for
realizing the basic errors of their ways and the urgency of contrition.
   The current path leads eventually, sooner or later, toward more war and
destruction in "the Holy Land".  A whole new course is needed for the welfare,
indeed for the survival, of both the Palestinians and the Israelis.  Whether
it will come before, or after, is the basic question thoughtful and sane people
should be contemplating.



PALESTINIAN RULING BODY TO COLLAPSE IN WEEKS, SAYS UN
  By Phil Reeves in Jerusalem

[The Independent, UK, 1 March 2001]
United Nations officials say Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Authority may have
only one month left before it collapses financially, plunging the occupied
territories into anarchy.

Their warnings back recent statements by the UN's Middle East envoy, Terje
Roed-Larsen, about the growing fiscal crisis facing the Palestinian Authority
(PA) because of the five-month intifada and Israel's economic blockade of the
West Bank and Gaza. The envoy's office is trying to convince the international
community to take these predictions seriously and to help bail out the
Palestinians before it is too late.

"There is no question in our minds that the PA could collapse by the end of
March, if nothing is done," said one source. "We have been criticised for
saying this but we seriously believe it to be true. We do not want to be
accused, after the event, of saying nothing."

The Palestinian intifada – and particularly Israel's unprecedentedly harsh
and
almost uninterrupted blockade of the occupied territories – has devastated
the
Palestinian economy, tripling unemployment (to at least 30 per cent) and
pushing the number of people living below the poverty line to about one
million.

About 100,000 Palestinians have been unable to cross into Israel to work.
Figures released this week by Mr Roed-Larsen's office showed income losses
of
$1.15bn from October to January. The main fear of Western diplomats is not
that the financial collapse of the PA – which cannot pay its 130,000 employees
– will bring about the fall of Yasser Arafat. His role as a figurehead, the
international face of the Palestinian cause for decades, is well understood
by
his domestic opponents.

But diplomats fear that the Palestinian leader's already partial control over
his population of three million will be so eroded that he will no longer be
in
a position to negotiate with the Israelis – for example over restoring calm
–
and that the occupied territories will slide into anarchy, withwarlords and
armed groups running amok. There are already signs that armed and largely
criminal elements are increasingly active and influential in parts of the West
Bank and Gaza.

The UN's drive to rescue the PA has been complicated by well-founded
international concerns about the deep corruption within it and fears that aid
money will disappear into private bank accounts. Mr Arafat is understood to
be
planning an anti-corruption drive, not least because the PA's dismal
reputation for graft boosts 

Re: [CTRL] Moon Landing A Hoax?

2001-03-01 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 So June I have had the biggest insult levied against me as of
 late..C. of BooHoo believes you and I are the same person, for you
 see I had become as foul mouthed as you.

I have never posted the profanity and foulness which regularly fill YOUR posts...


 So I am sorry for the language I used - and June I am glad you are okay
 - I understoodo you had been killed off by a sonic boom.

Perhaps you will enlighten us as to what drug or combination of drugs you are on?


 Saba aka June

I consider the above slander and libelous...



June aka June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Clinton's Trashy Wife looked upset at Bush Speech

2001-03-01 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Clinton's Trashy Wife looked upset at Bush Speech

2001-03-01 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

 Now Bush is Class and Class tells 

Well Saba, it's comforting to know you can really recognize "class" when you
see it.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Guardian Unlimited Observer International Hillary'strouble...

2001-03-01 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/28/2001 6:45:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 NO, it probably WAS NOT.  It was the LEAST ethical
 administration in our country's history. 

Alas, you have not looked into the others have you.  You must stop listening
to FOX and commence doing a bit of research.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Is the party over for Chelsea?

2001-03-01 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

Well BB I can only hope that your own children (if and when you have them)
are so fortunate as to have the exact same life experience that you feel was
so pleasant for Chelsea.  It is the least I can hope for you, since we all
know that we dream of a "better" life for our children.   Your judgment of
the "better life" is not mine, but be that as it may, I wish your children
the 'better life" you wish for them.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Is the party over for Chelsea?

2001-03-01 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/28/2001 7:33:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 As for Chelsie or Chelsea - there are rumours she is a lesbian but what
 would you expect - like father like mother like daughter? 

Dear Lord, Saba, is Bill Clinton a lesbian?  Fascinating.  More facts please,
possibly a picture?  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Is the party over for Chelsea?

2001-03-01 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/28/2001 7:44:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Whose heart do I hear breaking for the late Vince Foster?

 Whose heart do I hear breaking for the half million Iraqi civilians,
 almost all of them women and children, who died as a result of Clinton's
 blockade of Iraq?

 If one rails against Clinton, and not even mentions his single greatest
 crime, there must be a reason. What's yours? 

You're right in your assessment of a greatest crime, but I'm not sure it was
initiated by Clinton.  I just don't think he had the courage to go against
the Bush resolutions about Iraq.  He never struck me as being just that
particular type of bastard--gutless on occasion, yes.  If what I'm hearing
mentioned now is the pulling of the sanctions against Iraq, Dubya may
vindicate his past sins.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Churchill And The Slaughter Of Dresden...Double Standards

2001-03-01 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/28/2001 8:12:28 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  George Bush was right to fight for Kuwait. Clinton was wrong to
 murder hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children through sanctions. Playing
the
 biggest boy on the block will see Uncle Sam end up the way of the Russian
 bear. President Bush needs to reshape sanctions on Iraq. Colin Powell, a
 decent man, understands the limitations of bombing. Saddam Hussein is
 probably more popular today than he was 10 years ago. there must be another
 way, and the new regime in Washington has to see this before it's too late.
  

I don't know what Kuwait has to do with the American way, but suppose you're
right, and Bush did the right thing.  He did it for all the wrong reasons.
Where does that fit in the argument?   Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Search project prepares to challenge Google - …

2001-03-01 Thread Kris Millegan

-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-4950537.html?tag=tp_pr
Click Here: A
HREF="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-4950537.html?tag=tp_pr"Search
project prepares to challenge Google -  …/A
-
By Paul Festa
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
February 26, 2001, 11:20 a.m. PT A company in the business of reviving
abandoned technologies is preparing a peer-to-peer search engine aimed
straight at the heart of Google.
Web search technology has long been vexed by the problem of prioritizing the
thousands of Web pages that common queries yield. Project Pandango, the
work-in-progress of Seattle-based i5 Digital, attempts to determine that
priority by examining the Web surfing histories of a wide network of
computers on the Web.
The ambition driving Pandango's creators is to take the peer-to-peer model,
made famous by file-swapping applications such as Napster, and build a search
technology on it that will topple the current market leaders.

"This is the third generation of Web searching, and Google has to be
concerned with how they stay ahead of the curve," said Liad Meidar, chief
executive of i5 Digital. "Being able to leverage a P2P network to do a search
is taking what Google's done to the next level."
i5 Digital is putting the finishing touches on Pandango while pursuing
negotiations with what Meidar describes as "a lot of the household names in
search portals, ISPs if you will, Web-based companies with large numbers of
users," Meidar said.
Because Google powers the search feature on Yahoo, the Web's most-visited
site, it is considered the reigning king of search technology. The company
also runs its own Web site.
Meidar is quick to point out how Pandango's approach differs from those of
its potential competitors. Google, for example, is based on traditional
academic citation analysis, which determines the relevance of a scholarly
article based on how many times other articles cite it. Google ranks pages
based on how many other pages link to them.
Pandango, by contrast, would determine relevance by examining a radiating
network of "referrers." Once someone downloaded Pandango and joined its
peer-to-peer network, that person's keyword search would examine the Web
histories and bookmarks of an initial network of 100 referrers. From there,
the application would search the Web histories of those 100 referrers'
combined 10,000 referrers, and once again--so that the query would canvass
the Web pages visited and bookmarked by 1 million people.
The system is being designed to refine itself over time based on which
pages--and by extension which referrers--the searcher selected. Frequently
selected referrers would move to the top of an individual's referrer heap,
while others would drop off and new recruits would join. In the process, the
Pandango member would be developing an initial referrer group of like-minded
Web surfers, whose once- and twice-removed referrers would be increasingly
like-minded as well.
A P2P collaboration
If Pandango is a child of the peer-to-peer craze, then its other parent is
the more tried-and-true Web marketing technology known as collaborative
filtering. Familiar to shoppers at e-commerce sites such as Amazon.com,
collaborative filtering analyzes people's behavior to speculate on
preferences and make recommendations.
In the Amazon example, the technology lets the company look at what one
customer has bought and recommend books based on what other buyers of that
book have purchased in addition to it.
"This was about finding a way to find a group with common interests," said
Erik Fretheim, chief technical officer for i5 Digital. "The idea comes from
collaborative filtering, the concept that people who are like you, who have
similar interests, are probably the best guides to what to find."
Fretheim likened the Pandango search experience to common word-of-mouth
queries.
"When you come to a new town looking for a doctor, you could look in the
phone book, which is like your typical search engine. What you do instead is
you ask your peers, people you know, for recommendations rather than just
take a blind shot at something."
Peer-to-peer schemes have proved wildly popular in some instances, such as
Napster. But so far they have proven both legally hazardous and difficult to
translate into profits.
Although Pandango would likely sidestep the legal quagmire that has tripped
up Napster--and frightened other peer-to-peer ventures--analysts say i5
Digital will have to be creative in coming up with ways to make money with
the project.
"I really like the technology, but whether or not it's a business model is
the question I have," said Scott Pope, a Boston-based independent analyst and
consultant until recently with the Delphi Group. "It's an interesting
concept, but who's going to pay for this? It may wind up being more appealing
to the people in academia or to consumers rather than major companies."
i5 Digital hopes to license the Pandango technology to companies that would
pay to 

[CTRL] GOLD MARKET GIRDS ITS LOINS FOR A MAJOR RUN

2001-03-01 Thread Kris Millegan

-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.minesite.com/archives/features_archive/feb2001/goldmarket-17.htm
Click Here: A
HREF="http://www.minesite.com/archives/features_archive/feb2001/goldmarket-17.

htm"GOLD MARKET GIRDS ITS LOINS FOR A MAJOR RUN/A
-
 Features

GOLD MARKET GIRDS ITS LOINS FOR A MAJOR RUN
J.P.Morgan , one of the leading gold hedging bankers, reckon the game is
over. In a note issued last Friday "For Internal Distribution Only" they say
that the rise in gold lending rates - now 4.5 per cent compared with 0.5 per
cent before Christmas - has inverted the yield curve for gold lenders. The
"shorts" are starting to feel the pain and that is the reason for the sharp
moves in gold equities and the metal itself. But there is a way to go. At the
time of the Washington Agreement in September 1999 lease rates were as high
as 10 per cent.
These higher lease rates, the bankers suggest, are either due to traders
borrowing to "short " the metal or trying to acquire gold to meet a market
shortage. Interestingly they see the steady flattening of the yield curve
over the past six months as a mirror image of the way the market reacted
before the Washington Agreement when limits were set on sales and lending by
central banks.
There are now rumours that a second Washington Agreement, formulated by the
new Bush administration, may now be in the offing. This view is supported by
an unusual note circulated to all member representatives by the World Gold
Council. The note suggests that the central banks are no longer agreed in
their attitude to gold lending. The combination of a low gold price and huge
short positions is worrying the major official holders of gold and this
undermines the aim of the Washington Agreement which was to remove
uncertainty over the likely volume of official sales and put a ceiling on
gold lending.
The World Gold Council has noticed big selling at the PM market fix recently
which reflects either some hefty selling by the official sector or a very
large hedge being put in place. At the same time a tightness in supply is
causing the rise in gold lease rates and the Bank of England appears to have
suspended its gold lending. Such a move is unprecedented and seems to be the
nub of the WGC's concern as its short term lending is a vital tool in the
smooth running of the London market. And it even goes as far as to suggest
that the Bank's explanation for the current tightness in liquidity is less
than fulsome.
This is quite something, and it goes further with the World Gold Council
apparently preferring the stories going round the market that another move by
central banks to cut the amount of gold available for lending is imminent.
Such a move would obviously crank up lease rates and countries who did not
subscribe to the original Washington Agreement and have increased their
lending significantly in recent months would have to run for cover. This
would make a price spike in gold inevitable.
Countries such as Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Uruguay have been lending gold of
late and it is the severe shortage of physical gold which has caused the Bank
of England to withdraw. Veneroso Associates, a well respected analyst of the
gold scene, reckon that gold loans are three times higher than the official
figures at 17,000 tonnes and estimates the annual supply /demand deficit to
be running at 2,000 tonnes. The central banks are therefore between a rock
and a hard place and will run out of gold unless the price rises sufficiently
to quell demand.
Politics then raises its ugly head, and no politics are uglier than when
Clinton is involved. He could not resist getting involved in conspiring
against gold if it meant that Wall Street benefited. Some months ago the
conspiracy was exposed when a Texas group, the Gold Anti-Trust Action
Committee accused top Wall Street investment firms of conspiring with the
U.S. Federal Reserve Board, among others, to depress the price of gold. In a
complaint filed in the U.S. District Court of Boston, Mass., GATA sought
compensation for an alleged price-fixing scheme it says involves J.P. Morgan
 Co. Inc., Chase Manhattan Corp., Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
and Deutsche Bank AG.
There is no little doubt that the Bush Administration will give any
investigation into gold fixing a fair wind and this could bring our very
clever Chancellor into the net just before a general election. The sales of
UK gold reserves always smelt of politics rather than portfolio realignment
which was the official explanation. And the blustering when the damage done
to poor gold producing countries was pointed out made this ever more certain.
When Clinton beckoned Blair jumped, but it would be embarrassing if the
remaining gold sales had to be cancelled with gold soaring above the various
prices at which Brown sold the 25 tonne lots..
It is clearly time to buy gold and Loeb Aron, the thinking man's broker, is
recommending August gold futures to its institutional clients. The share
prices of 

Re: [CTRL] Is the party over for Chelsea?

2001-03-01 Thread Nessie

-Caveat Lector-

 According to the international group "Witnesses For Pease," ***FIVE
HUNDRED THOUSAND*** innocent Iraqi children **PER YEAR**  have died
horrific deaths (curable infection, starvation, etc.) via the
"humanitarian economic sanctions" Bush Sr. instituted in '91 at the end
of the Persian Gulf War.


You're right. Sorry. I should have said, " . . . AT LEAST half million .
. ."

The fact is, we don't know how many, so it's better to err upward.
Besides, even one of these deaths is too many.

A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send 
email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Clinton's Trashy Wife looked upset at Bush Speech

2001-03-01 Thread Aleisha Saba

-Caveat Lector-

Well Prudy if you consider Clinton and Monica class - and at the same
time Carville calls Paula Jones "trailer trash".

Understand Bush had the oval office fumigated...

Clinton was given a lot of rope, wasn't he; so now, let us say the
symbol of the Planagenets was and still is, a broom...

Its clean up time.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Is the party over for Chelsea?

2001-03-01 Thread Aleisha Saba

-Caveat Lector-

Maybe Clinton is a woman?Maybe he is both?   Its a strange world -
it was his unusual choice for attorney general (Janet Reno) that made me
wonder.

Wonder if Clinton was in the girl scouts?

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Clinton's Trashy Wife looked upset at Bush Speech

2001-03-01 Thread c.

-Caveat Lector-

- Original Message -
From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Clinton's Trashy Wife looked upset at Bush Speech



 Its clean up time.


yup- i agree- time for them to cash in and clean up all the money floating
around as fast as they possibly can- nose champagne is an expensive (but
rewarding) recreation.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Cases of Swine Casting Pearls aka

2001-03-01 Thread Aleisha Saba

Pearls of Wisdom from June..




Homosexual, Control Fiends and Pedophiles

From: revcoal   (little June)
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual, Control
Fiends and Pedophiles
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:41:53 -0400
 -Caveat Lector-


On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Edward Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hey let's do this, apply the authors logic to God. I have not seen
Him/Her display any responsibility for His/Her creation.


[Junes Response Pearls of Wisdom]

ALso consider that he knocked-up a virgin, and left Joseph to raise His
child   ;-)
June
*==*
The sun was warm but the wind was chill.
   You know how it is with an April day:
   When the sun is out and the wind is still,
   You're one month on in the middle of May.
   But if you so much as dare to speak,
   A cloud comes over the sunlit arch,
   A wind comes off a frozen peak,
  And you're two months back in the middle of March.
 -- Robert Frost:  Two Tramps in Mudtime
*==*
*--*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*--*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
$500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
email.
*==*
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These
are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths,
misdirections and outright frauds is used politically  by different
groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of
time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the
validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you
read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not
apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
References:
Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual, Control Fiends and
Pedophiles
From: Edward Ford 04/07/1999
Prev by Date: Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual,
Control Fiends and Pedophiles
Next by Date: [CTRL] Satellite 'Big Brother' eyes parolees
Prev by thread: Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual,
Control Fiends and Pedophiles
Next by thread: Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual,
Control Fiends and Pedophiles
Index(es):
Date
Thread




http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg09717.html




Re: [CTRL] Cases of Swine Casting Pearls aka

2001-03-01 Thread c.

-Caveat Lector-

yeah- it is awful, joesph was only good for knocking up bookshelves- that's
why mary married him( practical as most women are) - but was getting a bit
on the side from "the beard" cause he really moved the earth (if you know
what i mean) for her- much as he did for moses on occaision- but i am not
saying he was sodomising him or anything, saying something about anyone's
sexual proclivities would be most unseemly, don't you think
aliesha-ma-peacha?
unless it is said with relish.


- Original Message -
From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 6:20 PM
Subject: [CTRL] Cases of Swine Casting Pearls aka


Pearls of Wisdom from June..




Homosexual, Control Fiends and Pedophiles

From: revcoal   (little June)
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual, Control
Fiends and Pedophiles
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:41:53 -0400
 -Caveat Lector-


On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Edward Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hey let's do this, apply the authors logic to God. I have not seen
Him/Her display any responsibility for His/Her creation.


[Junes Response Pearls of Wisdom]

ALso consider that he knocked-up a virgin, and left Joseph to raise His
child   ;-)
June
*==*
The sun was warm but the wind was chill.
   You know how it is with an April day:
   When the sun is out and the wind is still,
   You're one month on in the middle of May.
   But if you so much as dare to speak,
   A cloud comes over the sunlit arch,
   A wind comes off a frozen peak,
  And you're two months back in the middle of March.
 -- Robert Frost:  Two Tramps in Mudtime
*==*
*--*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*--*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
$500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
email.
*==*
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These
are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths,
misdirections and outright frauds is used politically  by different
groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of
time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the
validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you
read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not
apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
References:
Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual, Control Fiends and
Pedophiles
From: Edward Ford 04/07/1999
Prev by Date: Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual,
Control Fiends and Pedophiles
Next by Date: [CTRL] Satellite 'Big Brother' eyes parolees
Prev by thread: Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual,
Control Fiends and Pedophiles
Next by thread: Re: [CTRL] Homosexuals in the Military:OR Homosexual,
Control Fiends and Pedophiles
Index(es):
Date
Thread

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A 

[CTRL] PC privacy 2

2001-03-01 Thread byron wahl

-Caveat Lector-

--- byron wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:41:51 -0800 (PST)
 From: byron wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: PC privacy 2
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 --- byron r wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:15:16 -0800
  Subject: PC privacy 2
  From: byron r wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  PC privacy
  2...
 
  Reading online data concerning computer and
 internet
  communication
  privacy leaves me feeling somewhat discouraged.
  Apparently it doesn't
  really exist. The multi-billion dollar
 corporations
  don't trust anything,
  period. The best they can do is to use very strong
  encryption and private
  lines.
 
  Some of the internet privacy freaks and
  techno-supergeeks resort to
  "proxy servers" which render the user kind of
  invisible-like to his ISP.
   The proxy mode of access is hard to understand
 let
  alone install, tweak,
  and actually use. It involves a mysterious
 something
  called an "external
  shell" which is regarded as essential for secure,
 or
  maybe almost-secure,
  operations. In any case, the use of these methods
  amounts to waving a red
  flag in the face of your service provider since
 they
  are the
  self-appointed guardians of our sexual purity and
  national insecurity.
 
  The use of encryption isn't regarded with such
 dark
  suspicion because it
  has become a normal part of doing internet
 business.
  If it's good for
  business it must be OK. And of course encryption
  always has a "back-door"
  to facilitate fedbeast's access to our most
 private
  affairs.
 
  The easiest smoke-screen to operate behind is
  probably the time-honored
  anonymous web-surfing provider. The swiftest and
  least commercialized
  anonymous surfer I've found so far may be found at

  www.safeweb.com  and
  it's a joy to use. For the encrypted anonymous
 email
  remailer try
  www.all-nettools.com/  -- both sites are mines of
  marvelous, much-needed
  information.
 
  For the firewall probing packets blocker go to
  www.neoworx.com  and try
  their NeoWatch. I use Hack Tracer which is Sharp
  Technology and it's
  associated with Neoworx. Another one is the old
  standby Zone Alarm from
  Zone Labs -- it reports offenders' DNS numbers
  emanating from operatives
  not reported by the others and vice versa so I use
  two of them. It's
  amazing the hanky-panky going on all the time when
  you access the
  internet.
 
  After you get the DNS numbers of the probers enter
  those into SmartWhois
  downloaded from  www.tamos.com/  SmartWhois is
  incredibly fabulous. It
  really gets into the exact detail of who is trying
  to sneak their way
  into your computer.
  For instance, after posting my earlier comments on
  computers transmitting
  your credit card and PIN numbers to well-equipped
  spies in nearby
  buildings I experienced a probe event authored by
  the Sakura
  Bank-Internet online banking collossus in Osaka.
  They didn't get very
  far. Their probing packets attempted to enter via
 a
  very obscure port
  normally used for nothing.
 
  As we all know, cookies and history should be
  expunged before going
  online. Also, the program Kleen-It downloaded from

  www.overware.com
  removes the files implanted by Microbloat, online
  service providers, and
  other miscreants -- files which virus scans can't
  scan so we shouldn't
  have them hanging around on our hard disk. Trojans
  are not detected by
  anti-virus scans. Trojans can wreak havoc. You can
  download a Sub7 Trojan
  detector/expunger -- use a search engine to locate
  it.  Sub7 works as a
  .EXE  plague.
 
  One solution is simply to avoid having any serious
  data on the hard disk
  of your online computer. Sensitive data may be
 kept
  on an isolated
  computer which is never used to access the
 internet.
  Thermonuclear
  operatives use that method. The online computer
  should be periodically
  wiped clean and the operating system re-installed
  from scratch. This is
  easily done if you are using Windows98  (WIN98).
  This method nullifies
  surreptitious files, undetectable trojans etc etc
  which your security
  precautions failed to block. The probers will be
  attempting to enter a
  machine which features a big zero if they do
 manage
  to get inside. Only
  encrypted passwords should be stored on the hard
  disk. Never check yes
  for the Save Password? box when you login. Don't
  store credit card
  numbers on the hard disk, ever.
 
  A word of caution concerning Linux. If Linux is
  installed using the
  entire hard disk, i.e., Linux is the only
 operating
  system installed, you
  will not be able to drop Linux and re-install
  Windows because LILO -- the
  Linux Loader -- is glued to the hard disk with
  immutable epoxy and
  prevents the installation of Windows or anything
  else except the
  reinstallation of Linux. To be rid of it
  necessitates 

[CTRL] FBI Arrests 7 for Raising Funds for Iran Rebel Group

2001-03-01 Thread radman

-Caveat Lector-

FBI Arrests 7 for Raising Funds for Iran Rebel Group

February 28, 2001
By Sarah Tippit

http://news.excite.com/news/r/010228/18/international-crime-iran-dc

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Seven people have been arrested on charges of
raising more than $1 million for the main Iranian opposition group
People's Mujahideen Organization by posing as charity workers
soliciting funds at Los Angeles airport for starving orphans the FBI
said on Wednesday.

FBI officials told a news conference that the seven were arrested on
Tuesday following a three-year investigation. The suspects were
charged with several counts of supporting an official terrorist
organization, officials said. An arraignment was expected late on
Wednesday in Los Angeles. The charges carry a maximum prison sentence
of 10 years per count, officials said.

The group is also known as the Mujahideen-e Khalq Organization (MEK).

"The MEK is a known terrorist group," said James DeSarno, the
assistant FBI director for the Los Angeles office said. "I think the
arrests are very significant ... We certainly hope it puts a crimp on
their fund-raising activity."

DeSarno said the seven Iranian nationals -- six men and one woman who
was considered the ringleader -- dressed in business suits and
approached travelers, primarily Asians who did not speak good
English, arriving at Los Angeles International Airport.

After showing them graphic photos of Iranian orphans and alleged
atrocities by the Iranian government, they collected up to $10,000 a
day which they said was to be spent to aid a charitable group called
"The Committee for Human Rights in Iran," which purported to use the
money to feed starving children.

According to a federal affidavit, the Los Angeles-based fund-raisers
transferred more than $1 million in donations to two Turkish bank
accounts in the three years.

During April, 1999, more than $400,000 was transferred out of those
accounts to a used auto parts store in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
The transfer, FBI officials said, did not appear to be related to
humanitarian relief.

"It is believed that the money was used to buy arms including mortars
and rocket propelled grenades for the Mujahideen-e Khalq group's
National Liberation Army," DeSarno said.

FBI officials also believe that the accused, aided by an unknown
number of volunteers in the Los Angeles area, solicited money from
the city's substantial Iranian community, which is one of the largest
Iranian expatriate communities in the world.

They stressed that the Iranian donors were likely unaware that they
were contributing money to terrorists, FBI spokesman Matthew
McLaughlin said.

The investigation, known as Operation Eastern Money, was initiated by
the German National Criminal Police who told FBI officials that
members of the MEK were involved in money laundering in Los Angeles.

Formed in the 1960s by college educated children of Iranian
merchants, the MEK sought to counter what it saw as excessive Western
influence in the then-Shah's regime. Following a philosophy that
mixes Marxism and Islam the group stresses propaganda and sometimes
uses violence.

It often uses Iraq as a springboard for attacks into Iran and has
several bases equipped with tanks, heavy guns, and helicopter
gunships close to the Iranian border.

The MEK is one of several groups listed as a "terrorist organization"
by Washington. A similar designation was recently assigned to the
group by the British government. From the 1970s to the 1990s, MEK
staged attacks inside Iran where it killed several U.S. military
personnel and civilians. The organization has carried out several
rocket attacks and assassinations in Iran's big cities in recent
months as part of a campaign to overthrow the Islamic Republic.

It also participated in the takeover in 1979 of the U.S. Embassy in
Tehran and was responsible for the violent occupation of the Iranian
mission to the United Nations in New York in 1992.

"None of these (arrested) individuals ... are tied to any terrorist
act, either here or in the United States or overseas," DeSarno said.
However, he said that money raised was intended to support MEK which
is known to have committed terrorist acts.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives 

Re: [CTRL] Cases of Swine Casting Pearls aka

2001-03-01 Thread Aleisha Saba

-Caveat Lector-

So C. of BooHoo - June says what you said was slander and libel -
however I am not going to sue you for calling me June.

But I say this - I bet someoneo has a big lightning bolt just waiting
for her to get her big can off her computer chair...wanna bet?

You must remember the Christian June claimed to be a Christian and I
wonder, though - what kind of Christian?

Me, I am leaning towards Zen Buddism.Dung Foo Master Degree.

Sayanora, C of BooHoo, Apple of Mine Eye.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Clinton's Trashy Wife looked upset at Bush Speech

2001-03-01 Thread Aleisha Saba

-Caveat Lector-

Well I say this BooHoo Clinton got caught laughing and making jokes
about homosexual and Barney Franks is MAD..

He also made jokes about blacks - but Jesse Jackson is in no position to
retaliate.

The Clinton took their votes, and stole their money - and laughs behind
their backs.

It was Hilliary who called a man a "jew bastard" and this was supposed
to be a compliment?

Will Mourning Become Electra?

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Is the party over for Chelsea?

2001-03-01 Thread Sally Marsh
In a message dated 02/28/2001 3:59:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Let's excuse every idiotioc, juvenile, criminal act that numbskull and his
wife
ever committed on the weak and pathetic excuse that "well, OTHER people did
bad things too". What superb logic. 

 He was supposed to be ABOVE everyone
else - the MOST ETHICAL. 

ALL presidents and elected officials are supposed to be ABOVE everyone else.

 It's delightful to see how open-hearted and forgiving
you liberals are, as long as the miscreants are LIBERAL DEMOCRATS.


It's curious to think that the conservatives are questioning Clinton's morals
without condeming ALL the others. If they truly want to influence morals,
one would think they would do so on all elected officials and not just the
democrats. Or do they just become moralistic when the opposition falters? 
Do we only persecute, blacks, hispanics and democrats or do the conservatives
believe in equal rights or did they just discover morals?

I'm not excusing Clinton's actions or Bushes or Reagan's. But if we are
going to get moralistic let's be equitable. 

Discuss1234
Web Site: horsesdontfly.com


Re: [CTRL] CST: Smell of vote fraud lingers

2001-03-01 Thread Sally Marsh
In a message dated 03/01/2001 12:56:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


This showed that Al Gore would have gained only 49 net votes in
Miami-Dade County even if a very liberal interpretation of voting
intentions had been in force--far short of the 600 votes that the
Gore camp had estimated in the post-election skirmishing

If a criminal robs a bank and the safe is empty does that mean he isn't a
thief? Perhaps, Bush would have won the election legally and democratically,
but he chose to take the election without regard to the voter count or civil
rights. 
Of all the goals and assertions Bush has made during his presidency - none
have addressed election reform. 

Best regards,
Discuss1234
Web Site: horsesdontfly.com


[CTRL] CT: THE CLINTONS' PROLONGED 15 MINUTES

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/wycliff/

THE CLINTONS' PROLONGED 15 MINUTES

DON WYCLIFF
March 1, 2001

First a phone caller, then an e-mail correspondent made the same
complaint: Why did you run that huge, quarter-page photo of
Hillary Rodham Clinton on Page 1 Friday at the same time you were
running a (relatively) tiny picture of President Bush? Why did
you give lead-story treatment to Clinton's remarks about her
brother's role in some disputed pardons while placing the story
about Bush's press conference comments on Iraq and a tax cut
below the fold?

These complaints echoed those that washed over us like a tsunami
during the presidential campaign last fall: Why are you running
big pictures of Al Gore and little ones of George W. Bush? Why
did you have Gore on Page 1 and Bush in the obituaries?

Gore/Clinton. Hugh Rodham/Roger Clinton. Hillary/Bill. To Bush
partisans, they're all the same: characters from a canceled
sitcom who still insist on showing up in prime time, stealing
scenes from the new leading man and his ensemble.

But this is more than just a partisan complaint. The Pew Research
Center for the People and the Press reported last week that 53
percent of Americans felt there had been too much news coverage
of Bill Clinton and his works and pomps since he left office. Add
in Hillary and Al Gore and the rest of that madcap gang and the
figure might get up to two-thirds.

So why do the media continue to thrust them all before the
public, to the dismay of readers and viewers and to the neglect
of "more important" stories, like Bush's tax-cutting plans or his
Iraq policy? More specifically, why did the Tribune give such
prominence to the Hillary picture and story Friday, to the
disadvantage of the Bush picture and story?

The latter is the easier to answer. Quite simply, Bush's remarks
on taxes, Iraq and the other topics he covered during his first
White House news conference were not really new; he had said it
all before. Indeed, the news conference story was only marginally
a Page 1 story. It was made so mainly by the fact that it was his
first as president--the sort of event that ought, at some level,
to be memorialized.

Hillary Rodham Clinton's press conference, on the other hand, was
real news and was about a matter as serious as a heart attack:
What did this newly elected United States senator and former
first lady know about the circumstances of some foul-smelling
pardons granted by her husband? Were pardons in effect sold? Who
(besides the people pardoned) benefited and how? Obviously her
husband was involved in the business, but what about Sen.
Clinton?

You can argue about the size of that striking Hillary photo, but
not, it seems to me, with the fact that it belonged on Page 1
and, given the potential gravity of the situation she was
addressing, that the story of her remarks deserved the treatment
it got.

As to the larger question--why does the press keep throwing the
Clintons and their shenanigans up before the public?--the answer
is unsatisfying but inevitable: because it's good for you. I mean
that in the same way your mother (and mine) meant it when she
told you that your spinach or broccoli or--ugh!--Brussels sprouts
are good for you.

Every edition of a newspaper involves a balancing of what readers
want to know with what they need to know as citizens. And weary
of the Clintons though most of us may be, we need to know about
this pardon story.

As of Wednesday, two principal actors in the story had taken the
5th Amendment. That suggests that they, at least, fear criminal
prosecution for their actions. Another principal, Marc Rich, has
declined any cooperation with the various investigations.

If the Monica Lewinsky brouhaha stemmed from an unfaithful man's
attempt to conceal his infidelity, this Pardoner's Tale appears
to have grown out of something far more crass and venal and
pernicious: the trading of a uniquely presidential favor for
money. At least it looks enough like that to have prompted a
formal investigation by the Clinton-appointed U.S.attorney in New
York.

Only 42 people have ever enjoyed the privilege of granting a
presidential pardon. With rare exception, nobody has exercised it
in so obscene a fashion as Clinton. Yet members of Congress are
talking of altering or curtailing the privilege--by altering the
Constitution--to prevent such abuses in the future. That's
serious, serious business. And it's the reason that, as much as
the majority of Americans may want to be done with the Clintons,
we cannot be--at least for awhile.

You need to know about this story.


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A 

[CTRL] Watch/Listen online to House hearings

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

Watch/Listen online to House hearings

FOX - RealPlayer
Watch: http://www.foxnews.com/newsnow/video/fnchi.rmm

FOX - RealPlayer
Audio Only: http://www.foxnews.com/newsnow/video/fnclo.rmm

MSBNC - MediaPlayer
Watch: http://www.msnbc.com/news/asx/audio/28/MSNBC_ie5radio.asx
Watch: http://www.foxnews.com/newsnow/video/fnc50.asx


"Multimedia News Portal" - powered with the latest webfeed technology
PortalCheck.com: http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/NaltyNews/index.htm



Thursday March 1 10:02 AM ET

Top Clinton Aides Will Testify on Pardons

By John Whitesides

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Three former top White House aides will
appear before a congressional panel on Thursday to testify about
the final days of frantic deliberations on President Clinton's
controversial last-minute pardon spree.

Former White House counsel Beth Nolan, chief of staff John
Podesta and adviser Bruce Lindsey are scheduled to tell the House
Government Reform Committee about the contacts and
decision-making used in the pardon for fugitive financier Marc
Rich that has sparked two congressional investigations and a
federal criminal probe.

Clinton, hoping to put the pardons scandal to rest, waived any
executive privilege claims and gave his aides approval to testify
freely when they appear before the panel at noon, even though
they are expected to say they opposed the pardon.

Testimony and documents in the congressional probes indicate
there was considerable debate over the Rich pardon in the final
days of Clinton's presidency.

``He got advice that this was controversial and he got advice
against doing this,'' Podesta said earlier this month.

The House panel subpoenaed the three aides in its widening
investigation of possible influence peddling or links between
campaign donations and the pardon of Rich and others on Clinton's
last day in office. Rich's ex-wife Denise gave more than $1
million to Democratic causes and $450,000 to the Clinton library.

Committee investigators got a brief peek on Wednesday at the
names of those donors who contributed more than $5,000 to the
library and won an agreement from Clinton attorney David Kendall
for a broader review of those donors that investigators suspect
might be linked to the pardon of Rich or others.

The committee had subpoenaed information on all donors
contributing more than $5,000 to the Clinton library fund, and
threatened library officials with contempt if they did not
comply.

Invoking Fifth Amendment

Kendall resisted the request, citing privacy concerns, but agreed
to allow investigators to see more information, including dates
and total donation amounts, on donors selected by committee
investigators.

The deal means the committee will not call Skip Rutherford, the
library foundation's president, to testify on Thursday.

But still scheduled to appear before the panel is former
Democratic National Committee finance chairwoman Beth Dozoretz,
who has informed investigators that she will invoke her Fifth
Amendment protection against self-incrimination and refuse to
answer committee questions.

The probe of Rich, who fled to Switzerland 17 years ago to avoid
prosecution on racketeering, wire fraud, income tax evasion and
illegal oil trading charges, has expanded to look at other
pardons and sentence commutations by Clinton.

Rodham Brothers Linked To Pardon Controversy

Among the other cases being probed are those of a convicted
swindler and a major cocaine dealer who paid some $400,000 to
Hugh Rodham, Clinton's brother-in-law, to advance their bids for
clemency.

Rodham ultimately gave the money back after Clinton and former
first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton complained.

Adding to the pardon controversy, the New York Times reported on
Thursday that a Tennessee couple convicted of bank fraud were
pardoned a year ago by Clinton with the help of Mrs. Clinton's
other brother, Tony Rodham.

The pardon of carnival company owners Edgar Allen Gregory and his
wife, Vonna Jo, was given despite objections from the Justice
Department, the paper said. Tony Rodham was not paid for his
efforts.

Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, said he sent a
letter to Clinton inviting him to a private interview as part of
the Senate Judiciary Committee's look into the pardons. He said
the approach could avoid the ``circus-like atmosphere'' of a full
hearing.

``I don't want the president to think that we're looking for any
notoriety or publicity in what we're doing here,'' he said on
CNN's ``Larry King Live.''

``It's a very serious professional suggestion and the president
is entitled to some time to think about it.''

Rich's attorney, Jack Quinn, a former White House counsel, former
Rich attorney Lewis Libby, now Vice President Dick Cheney's chief
of staff, and Peter Kadzik, an attorney for Podesta who works at
a law firm that has represented Rich, are also expected to
testify at the hearing.

=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, 

[CTRL] WP: Rich Aide Alluded to Pardon More Than a Year Ago

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/onpolitics/articles/pardons030101.htm#home
page1

Rich Aide Alluded to Pardon More Than a Year Ago

By James V. Grimaldi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 1, 2001; 12:01 PM

A top aide to Marc Rich alluded more than a year ago to seeking a
presidential pardon for the fugitive financier in correspondence
with Rich's attorneys, calling it "the unconventional approach
which has not yet been tried and which I have been proposing all
along," according to one of dozens of documents made public
today.

Attorneys for Rich have said that the earliest they began
discussing a pardon was last fall. But congressional
investigators believe they have found a reference to it in an
e-mail from Avner Azulay, director of the Rich Foundation in
Israel and the leading strategist for the pardon.

In February of last year, Azulay rejected the notion of Rich
surrendering to authorities in New York in exchange for the
dropping of racketeering charges in a 1983 indictment accusing
Rich of failing to pay $48 million in taxes and trading with Iran
while it held U.S. hostages.

"The present impasse leaves us with only one other option,"
Azulay said of the stalemate with the U.S. Justice Department and
the U.S. Attorney's office in Manhattan.

The e-mail appears among exhibits released today at the beginning
of the fourth congressional hearing on the controversial pardons
at the end of the Clinton administration. The House Government
Reform Committee opened the hearing at noon, with the first
scheduled witness Beth Dozoretz, a Democratic fund-raiser who
also pressed Clinton to pardon Rich and his business partner
Pincus "Pinky" Green. Dozoretz pledged to raise $1 million for
Clinton's library and helped secure a $450,000 donation from
Denise Rich, the ex-wife of Marc Rich.

While Dozoretz was prepared to assert her Fifth Amendment
privilege against self-incrimination, members of the panel
expected to hear Clinton's top three White House attorneys say
that they told the administration that the Rich pardon was a bad
idea. The witnesses include John Podesta, Clinton's chief of
staff, Beth Nolan, the White House counsel, and Bruce Lindsey, a
long-time aide to Clinton.

The committee, chaired by Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.), also has
obtained information regarding Podesta's personal attorney, Peter
Kadzik. Letters released by the committee today reveal that
Kadzik lobbied his own client on behalf of Rich, who has been
represented by other attorneys in his firm. Azulay's exchange
with Rich attorney Robert Fink occurs in February last year. Fink
wrote to Azulay that contacts with a prosecutor in New York and a
phone call with Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder did not
appear to be making any progress.

Fink reveals that New York prosecutors were willing to "drop the
RICO [racketeering] charge if we wanted, if Marc came in. They
would also agree in advance on bail, etc., so that he would not
be incarcerated pending trial (although he would have to
surrender his passport)." Fink also said that the prosecutors
said they would talk to lawyers and Rich's tax professors and "do
a full review before proceeding to a trial to make sure that upon
careful examination they stood on the strength of their case."

This e-mail appears to contradict the testimony and pardon
petition written by Jack Quinn, the former White House counsel in
the case. Quinn told the House Government Reform Committee last
month that the New York prosecutors were intransigent because of
"their unwillingness to sit down and meet with the tax professors
and review the case and try to come to a resolution of it, at any
time in the last decade or so."

Meanwhile, Podesta's opposition to the Rich pardon could come
under intense questioning. E-mails obtained by the committee
indicate that Podesta might have been passing along information
about the status of the Rich and Green pardon applications to his
attorney, Kadzik.

Kadzik, who also is set to testify, works at Dickstein, Shapiro,
Morin  Oshinsky, where Rich's longtime attorney Mike Green
works. Kadzik has told the committee that he was retained to work
on the Rich pardon and that he was involved in contacting his
client, Podesta.

The committee today released a letter dated Dec. 15 to Podesta
written by Kadzik. Kadzik refers to an earlier conversation and
supplies additional information on the pardon applications of
Rich, Green and James B. Coppinger, who was convicted of cocaine
distribution and conspiracy to distribute cocaine in Illinois in
1981. Coppinger's primary attorney also works at the Dickstein,
Shapiro firm, but Coppinger's pardon application is still pending
and was not granted by Clinton.

In a Jan. 16 e-mail between Rich's attorneys, Robert Fink wrote
Jack Quinn that Green called Fink after speaking with "Peter who
spoke with Podesta: It seems that while staff are not supportive,
they are not in veto mode, and that your efforts with POTUS
[president of the 

[CTRL] Boortz on the latest pardon stuff

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

...Anyone still think we should "just move on"?  This keeps getting better
and better.

http://www.boortz.com/nealznuz.htm

THE CLINTON PARDONS


Did you know that Roger Clinton made history when he received a
pardon from Bill Clinton?  That's because no other president has
ever given clemency to a relative.

According to constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley of
George Washington University, Roger Clinton's pardon also
violates the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which prohibits
officials from using their authority for the benefit of family
members.

Turley systematically dismantled any hint of legitimacy that
might have surrounded Roger Clinton's pardon:

--In 1984 he pleaded guilty to felony charges of distributing
cocaine and conspiracy to distribute cocaine.  So he's admitted
his guilt without claiming that he was innocent.

--There was no suggestion that he was denied due process or that
his rights were violated.

--There was no question as to an overzealous prosecutor or
over-sentencing. Turley notes that Roger Clinton's sentence was
actually below the national average for such drug charges.

So there was absolutely no basis on which Bill Clinton could
grant a pardon to his brother.

And have you heard the latest?  Hillary's other brother, Tony
Rodham, also helped obtain a presidential pardon last March.
The pardon was for Edgar Allen Gregory Jr. and his wife, Vonna
Jo.  The couple was accused of using the assets of their bank to
give loans to friends.  They were convicted of bank fraud in
1982.

Edgar Gregory's carnival business suffered because of his felony
conviction. Some states wouldn't allow him to run state fairs
because of it.  The Gregorys applied for a presidential pardon in
late 1998 and, after 18 months of waiting, approached Tony Rodham
for help.

The Justice Department, including the U.S. attorney who
prosecuted the case and the sentencing judge, objected
strenuously to a pardon for the Gregorys. The Gregorys were
unwilling to accept the criminality of their actions.  The couple
had ignored the warnings of bank regulators and caused two small
banks to fail without regard for the impact on other depositors.
Justice officials informed the White House that the Gregorys'
case was one of the most serious bank fraud cases ever prosecuted
in Alabama--and that pardoning them would diminish the
seriousness of their crimes.

Clinton pardoned them anyway on March 15, 2000.

It just so happens that Edgar and Vonna Jo Gregory are major
campaign contributors to both Democrats and Republicans--and they
contributed to the Senate campaign of Hillary Clinton.

Tony Rodham insists he didn't receive payment for his efforts on
the Gregorys' behalf...but he does have a substantial financial
interest in getting the pardon.  Rodham has worked as a
consultant to Edgar Gregory, helping him to purchase radio
stations and expand his carnival business.

At last, the American people are seeing the real Bill Clinton and
his abuses of power.  Better late than never--and I hope they
remember this shameful episode when Hillary's name is on the
presidential ballot in 2004.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21883
http://partners.nytimes.com/2001/03/01/politics/01PARD.html?Partner=AltaVist
aRefId=WLmY_WEFnnunNnuly_

=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] REU: Marc Rich Sued for New York Tax Evasion

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

WIRE: 03/01/2001 12:20 am ET

Marc Rich Sued for New York Tax Evasion


NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York state officials said on Thursday
they were suing pardoned billionaire financier Marc Rich for
income tax evasion and were seeking $137 million owed on money he
made in the 1980s while in control of two companies that admitted
fraud involving illegal oil trading.

The New York State Department of Taxation and Finance said it
filed a tax warrant Thursday against Rich, who fled the United
States to Switzerland 17 years ago under indictment on a string
of fraud and racketeering charges but was controversially
pardoned by former President Clinton during his last hours in
office Jan. 20.

"Mr. Rich has avoided his tax payments in New York for nearly two
decades while he was under federal indictment," New York State
Commissioner of Taxation and Finance Arthur Roth said in a
statement.

"It is now time for him to pay the piper," said Roth, who added
that the department had not previously filed civil litigation
against Rich in order not to jeopardize the federal investigation
against him that led to criminal charges.

Neither Rich nor a representative in Switzerland were available
for comment.

A congressional panel and a federal grand jury is investigating
possible influence peddling or links between campaign donations
and the pardon of Rich and others. Marc Rich's ex-wife Denise
gave more than $1 million to Democratic causes and $450,000 to
the Clinton presidential library.

Clinton's pardon of Rich has dogged him since leaving the White
House because the pardon appeared to bypass standard Justice
Department procedures and unlike many other people he pardoned,
Rich had never stood trial.

CIVIL CASES AGAINST RICH

Roth said that while Clinton's pardon erased criminal charges and
allowed Rich to avoid prosecution, the pardon left open the
government's ability to file civil cases against Rich, who lived
in New York in the early 1980s and had offices in Manhattan.

Roth's statement said the collection action included $26.9
million in back taxes for the years 1980-82 along with $13.5
million in penalties and $97.4 million in interest.

"We feel that Mr. Rich personally benefited from the admitted
fraud of at least two companies he controlled and therefore
evaded personal income taxes on the money he realized through his
control of those corporations," Roth said.

In 1984, Marc Rich International, Ltd and Marc Rich and Company
AG each pleaded guilty to 38 federal criminal counts in a scheme
involving the illegal trading of crude oil. The companies paid
$150 million to settle the case but the personal case against
Rich remained open. Marc Rich International also pleaded guilty
to income tax evasion.


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] MSNBC: New e-mails reveal campaign to pardon Rich more elaborate than previously known

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.msnbc.com/news/537637.asp

Pardon Mess Thickens

New e-mails reveal campaign to pardon Rich more elaborate than previously
known

By Michael Isikoff
NEWSWEEK WEB EXCLUSIVE


March 1 ‹ A new batch of provocative e-mails suggests that top
advisers to fugitive financier Marc Rich first plotted nearly a
year ago to send Rich¹s ex-wife, wealthy Democratic donor Denise
Rich, on a ³personal mission² to President Clinton‹the first
foray in an extraordinarily well-orchestrated pardon campaign
that began long before lawyers for Rich have publicly
acknowledged.   THE E-MAILS, among Rich¹s lawyers and
advisers, were subpoeanaed by congressional investigators and are
due to be released today at a hearing of the House Government
Reform Committee. They appear to show that the campaign to win
Rich a pardon was far more elaborate‹and may have begun much
earlier‹than was previously known.

³We are reverting to the idea discussed with Abe‹which is
to send DR on a Œpersonal mission¹ to NO1 with a well-prepared
script,² wrote Avner Azulay, a former top Mossad agent who now
heads the Marc Rich Foundation in Israel, in an e-mail to one of
Rich¹s lawyers in New York, Robert Fink, on March 18, 2000.

A congressional investigator said last night that the
House Government Reform Committee believes Azulay¹s cryptic
reference to ³NO1² is in fact code for ³Number One² or President
Clinton. ³DR² is a reference to Denise Rich. It was not
immediately clear who ³Abe² was.

Another Azulay e-mail suggests the former Israeli
intelligence official had been contemplating a pardon plea for
his boss even earlier than that. In a Feb. 10, 2000, e-mail,
Azulay expresses his disappointment that federal prosecutors in
New York had rejected an offer to negotiate a plea bargain of
Rich¹s 1983 indictment on tax-evasion and racketeering charges
while the financier remained overseas in Switzerland. Reacting
with disgust to a report from Rich¹s lawyer Jack Quinn that the
only thing the prosecutors are willing to negotiate is Rich¹s
³surrender² to federal authorities, Azulay wrote: ³I have to say
that ŒI told you so¹...² Azulay then adds: ³The present impasse
leaves us with only one other option: the unconventional approach
which has not yet been tried and which I have been proposing all
along.²

If so, the plotting for a presidential pardon in February and
March of 2000 would contradict previous public accounts by Quinn
that there was no consideration given to seeking a pardon for
Rich until November 2000 when federal prosecutors in New York
again rebuffed efforts to persuade them to drop the criminal
charges against Rich.

Azulay doesn¹t explain in the e-mail what ³the
unconventional approach² is. Fink, the e-mail recipient, is due
to testify at Thursday¹s hearing and is expected to be grilled
closely on what Azulay was referring to. But congressional
investigators say they believe ³the unconventional approach² is a
reference to a presidential pardon. If so, the plotting for a
presidential pardon in February and March of 2000 would
contradict previous public accounts by Quinn that there was no
consideration given to seeking a pardon for Rich until November
2000 when federal prosecutors in New York again rebuffed efforts
to persuade them to drop the criminal charges against Rich.

Perhaps more significantly, the early talk of a pardon
would undercut claims by ex-president Clinton¹s defenders that
there was no link between the pardon campaign and hefty donations
and pledges to the Clinton presidential library in May 2000 by
Denise Rich and her loyal friend and ally in the pardon efforts,
former Democratic Party finance chair Beth Dozoretz.

Records obtained by the House committee show that Denise
Rich, who had donated more than $1 million to the Democratic
Party during Clinton¹s presidency, also gave $450,000 to the
Clinton library‹including a $100,000 check that was written May
11, 2000, just two months after Azulay first talked about sending
Denise Rich on a ³personal mission² on behalf of her ex-husband.
The records also show that Dozoretz, who solicited Denise Rich¹s
contributions, pledged to raise $1 million for the library in May
2000. Federal prosecutors in New York are now aggressively
investigating the pardon and are especially interested in
determining whether monies donated by Denise Rich to the Clinton
library were secretly advanced by her ex-husband as part of his
efforts to win a presidential pardon.

Among the other documents obtained by congressional
investigators are a flurry of phone messages from Dozoretz to
Quinn that appear to seek regular updates on the status of the
Rich pardon case. ³Any news on the matter?² reads one Dozoretz
message on Jan. 2, 2001, as the pardon campaign was moving into
high gear. The phone-message slips show more than a dozen phone
messages for Quinn from Dozoretz in the weeks immediately before
and after the Jan. 

Re: [CTRL] Moon Landing A Hoax?

2001-03-01 Thread Nadia A Hamer

-Caveat Lector-

Aleisha,
Perhaps you would care to explain what you meant when you wrote:-

June perhaps you would want to give this Nadia Hammer (a bad penny) your
rendition of what sodomy is like.

That was such a lovely article you wrote I saved a copy.   You seem to
be a specialist in the field of sodomy

How do you two manage to share the same computer stool?

Or tell her about Jesus being the bastard son of a woman who was
"knocked up".

You are both a big pile of dung aka la mared?

And perhaps you could explain how the above fits in with the theme of this
list (Conspiracy) please?

With best wishes,
Nadia
PS the name is Hamer not Hammer and merde is spelt "merde" NOT "mared".

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Attention fellow RKBA activists!

2001-03-01 Thread Bill Richer





Attention fellow RKBA activists!

Use the following link to VOLUNTEER FOR HANDGUN CONTROL INC.!!!

Yes, you heard me right.  By checking the boxes titled:  "Attend local
gun-violence awareness events", and "Contact me if HCI holds an event in my
area", YOU can be informed well enough in advance to help organize a little
surprise for HCI.  How would it look if every HCI event had more or just as
many pro-gunners attending as gun-grabbers?


http://www.econtributor.net/Contribution/volunteer.cfm?VID=STIEIYPTZDEF

ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS REGISTER...AND THEN DO YOUR PART TO SEND
THE NEXT LOCAL HCI EVENT DOWN THE TOILET!!!




[CTRL] Marc Rich Sued for New York Tax Evasion

2001-03-01 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!


WIRE: 03/01/2001 12:20 am ET

Marc Rich Sued for New York Tax Evasion


NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York state officials said on Thursday
they were suing pardoned billionaire financier Marc Rich for
income tax evasion and were seeking $137 million owed on money he
made in the 1980s while in control of two companies that admitted
fraud involving illegal oil trading.

The New York State Department of Taxation and Finance said it
filed a tax warrant Thursday against Rich, who fled the United
States to Switzerland 17 years ago under indictment on a string
of fraud and racketeering charges but was controversially
pardoned by former President Clinton during his last hours in
office Jan. 20.

"Mr. Rich has avoided his tax payments in New York for nearly two
decades while he was under federal indictment," New York State
Commissioner of Taxation and Finance Arthur Roth said in a
statement.

"It is now time for him to pay the piper," said Roth, who added
that the department had not previously filed civil litigation
against Rich in order not to jeopardize the federal investigation
against him that led to criminal charges.

Neither Rich nor a representative in Switzerland were available
for comment.

A congressional panel and a federal grand jury is investigating
possible influence peddling or links between campaign donations
and the pardon of Rich and others. Marc Rich's ex-wife Denise
gave more than $1 million to Democratic causes and $450,000 to
the Clinton presidential library.

Clinton's pardon of Rich has dogged him since leaving the White
House because the pardon appeared to bypass standard Justice
Department procedures and unlike many other people he pardoned,
Rich had never stood trial.

CIVIL CASES AGAINST RICH

Roth said that while Clinton's pardon erased criminal charges and
allowed Rich to avoid prosecution, the pardon left open the
government's ability to file civil cases against Rich, who lived
in New York in the early 1980s and had offices in Manhattan.

Roth's statement said the collection action included $26.9
million in back taxes for the years 1980-82 along with $13.5
million in penalties and $97.4 million in interest.

"We feel that Mr. Rich personally benefited from the admitted
fraud of at least two companies he controlled and therefore
evaded personal income taxes on the money he realized through his
control of those corporations," Roth said.

In 1984, Marc Rich International, Ltd and Marc Rich and Company
AG each pleaded guilty to 38 federal criminal counts in a scheme
involving the illegal trading of crude oil. The companies paid
$150 million to settle the case but the personal case against
Rich remained open. Marc Rich International also pleaded guilty
to income tax evasion.


*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] AF News 2 Mar 01

2001-03-01 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!


0292.  Civil Air Patrol logs safest year in history

MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFPN) -- The Civil Air Patrol has posted its
safest year ever. For 2000, the rate, based on accidents per 100,000 flying
hours, was .94. This tops the 1992 record of 1.54.

"The best news, however, is no lives were lost," said CAP National Commander
Brig. Gen. James C. Bobick.

In CAP's Flight Safety Program, all pilots are kept abreast of flight
hazards and are encouraged to use risk management techniques to ensure safe
flight operations. Across the nation, Civil Air Patrol hosts special flight
clinics that emphasize safe operations. In addition, the safety staff
assesses challenging flying missions and identifies opportunities to reduce
risks during mountain searches and over-water missions.

CAP commanders submit current airworthiness directives compliance
checklists, weight and balance sheets, and a photocopy of the logbook entry
for 50-hour oil changes, 100-hour inspections and annual inspections. They
also provide altimeter certification, pitot/static system certification,
transponder certification, and verification of emergency locator transmitter
battery check.

"These actions demonstrate how seriously we consider safe operations while
conducting volunteer services," says Bobick. "The nature of our missions
demand no less."

CAP volunteers are often called upon to conduct airborne operations in more
difficult conditions than other pilots typically face. To ensure pilots are
prepared to meet these challenges, CAP has instituted other measures to
enhance pilot safety. These include a mountain flying course and a video
that demonstrates mountain and sea survival topics. This video will be used
in CAP's distant learning programs. New survival equipment, such as life
rafts, personal flotation aids, radios and electronic signaling devices will
complement this survival training.

The CAP is a nonprofit organization with a fleet of 530 aircraft. It is the
official Air Force auxiliary and performs more than 85 percent of inland
search and rescue missions tasked by the Air Force Rescue Coordination
Center in the continental United States.

For more details, visit the CAP Web site at: http://www.capnhq.gov/.



0294.  Association president visits Air Mobility Command bases

SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, Ill. (AFPN) -- Air Force Association National
President John Politi visited four Air Mobility Command bases recently as an
orientation to the command, its people and mission.

Politi, accompanied by his wife, Terri, visited Scott Air Force Base, Ill.,
Fairchild AFB, Wash., McChord AFB, Wash., and Travis AFB, Calif.

"If AFA is to represent all Air Force members and their families, it's
critical that we meet with them where they work and live," said Politi.

"As committed as Air Force leaders are to improving our Air Force, it's not
a job they can do alone," said John Politi, a retired colonel who spent 26
years in the Air Force. He believes issues such as new base housing and
purchasing aircraft depend on congressional support.

"That's where professional military organizations like the AFA are so
critical to the men and women of the Air Force," he said. "We help educate
members of Congress and their staffers on what our critical defense needs
are and what efforts should be made to retain our quality people. This is
more important than ever when you consider that only 37 percent of Congress
has ever served in the military and just six members of the Senate and 31
members of the House have any Air Force experience."

At each base, the Politis talked with Air Force enlisted, officers and
civilians as well as their family members to get a greater insight into
their responsibilities, their ops tempo and what they think is both good and
bad about serving in the Air Force.

"Each person we met was highly motivated, enthusiastic and professional,"
said Politi.  "Terri and I were grateful they openly shared their feelings
and concerns with us, not only the highlights but also the negatives as
well."

"We learned an enormous amount about you, the AMC mission, its weapon
systems and its facilities and are better prepared to speak on your behalf,"
he said.  "We pledge to work the issues as hard as possible to support your
needs."

Politi was selected as the national president of AFA at the organization's
national convention in September. He assumed his duties Oct 1.  (Courtesy of
AMC News Service)



0295.  Air Force announces '5-Star Award' Web site winners

WASHINGTON (AFPN) -- The Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, N.C., Web site has
been selected as the fourth quarter 2000 winner of the Air Force 5-Star
Award for Outstanding Public Web Site.

Second place was awarded to the Bolling AFB, D.C., Web site, and third place
went to the Air Force Space Command Web site.

"The Seymour Johnson Web site stands out for developing a site that promotes
the 

[CTRL] Democrat slams party for stance on tax relief

2001-03-01 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

The Washington Times
http://asp.washtimes.com/printarticle.asp?action=printArticleID=default-20013

1224526
--

--

Democrat slams party for stance on tax relief

Donald Lambro
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Published 3/1/01


--

--

 Democratic Sen. Zell Miller sharply criticized his party's political
leaders yesterday, warning that they were making "a terrible mistake" with
their class-warfare attacks against President Bush's tax-cut plan.
 Mr. Miller, the only Democrat thus far to embrace Mr. Bush's tax cut
plans, said that if his party continues to play polarizing politics on the
tax-cut issue "the voters are going to skin us alive" in the 2002 midterm
elections.
 The Georgia senator said he did not like the tactics being used by House
and Senate Democratic leaders to discredit Mr. Bush's tax-cut proposals. He
also denounced the language being used by Democratic National Committee
Chairman Terry McAuliffe as "over the top."
 "I think the Democratic Party could not have made a worse choice in
choosing Terry McAuliffe as chairman of the DNC. He stands in the shade of
Bill Clinton," Mr. Miller said in an interview with The Washington Times.
 Mr. Miller said he was particularly disturbed by the harshness of Mr.
McAuliffe's rhetoric. The DNC chairman has accused Mr. Bush of pushing a
"radical right-wing agenda" and continues to insist that Al Gore won the
election and that "the wrong man is sitting in the White House today."
 "I listened to him the day he made his speech accepting the
chairmanship, and to me it just sounded like fingernails just scraping across
a blackboard," he said.
 "That kind of language is just over the top, and it goes against what
most Americans want from us right now. They want us to solve these problems
and quick. And election year in and election year out we're talking about the
same . . . things that are used as political fodder. I'm talking about the
Democrats," he said.
 Mr. Miller also had harsh words for Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle
and House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt, who have repeatedly attacked
Mr. Bush's plan to cut income-tax rates across the board as a giveaway to the
rich at the expense of the poor and the middle class.
 "I hate this class-warfare talk. I think the Democrats are making a
terrible mistake and don't serve the people very well by engaging in it," he
said.
 "It's bad politics. Most of the poor that I know don't have this class
envy. They have this desire to move up in the world and into higher income
brackets," he said.
 "I think the Democrats are making a terrible mistake by being against a
tax cut. I know that they are saying they want tax cuts and want to make it
more fair and everything, but their body language and what Joe Sixpack hears
out there in the Kmart parking lot is that they're against giving him a tax
cut," he said.
 "If we go back in 2002 with this same old [class-warfare] mantra, the
voters are going to skin us alive," Mr. Miller said. "I don't like it."
 Mr. Daschle and Mr. Gephardt have denounced Mr. Bush's tax-cut plan,
saying it would result in a return of deficit spending, would provide little
if any tax cuts for people in the bottom brackets and do nothing to pay down
the debt.
 But Mr. Miller rejected their arguments as political hype and
distortions, saying: "I've heard all this before from the propeller heads
when I was cutting taxes in my state as governor. I just do not believe all
this doomsday talk. Figures don't lie, but liars do figure," he said.
 After Mr. Bush's address to Congress Tuesday night, Mr. Miller said he
had the feeling that the voters think "that this president is reaching out
and trying to solve problems."
 "And it looks like the Democrats are not reaching back like they should.
And I think that's bad for the country and bad for politics," he said.
 Mr. Miller said it was possible that Mr. Bush could obtain more support
from Democrats for his tax-cut plan if he raised his 33 percent top tax-rate
bracket or if he modified the estate-tax repeal.
 "Those might be some things that would bring people on board. I'm not
advocating that. I like it just the way it is, and I think it can be passed
pretty much like it is," he said.
 Mr. Miller said he was set against the Democratic idea of adding a
"trigger" provision in the tax cut in the event that surplus revenues
declined or disappeared entirely.
 "One of the things that you do by cutting taxes is that you let
taxpayers know that they are going to get a certain amount and they can make
those kinds of plans" such as future purchases or investments, he said.
 "But if you put a trigger on it, they assume that it's just not going to

[CTRL] MARC RICH and Others---FINGERED BY A LETTER

2001-03-01 Thread Kris Millegan

-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.skolnicksreport.com/mrfingered.html
Click Here: A HREF="http://www.skolnicksreport.com/mrfingered.html"Sherman
Skolnick's Report/A
-
MARC RICH and Others---FINGERED BY A LETTER
2/28/01 by Sherman H. Skolnick


The monopoly press reportedly is interested in a strange letter that has
surfaced. It names specific persons and events and it relates to the apparent
murder of Clinton White House Deputy Counsel Vincent W. Foster, Jr., July,
1993, the manipulation of the gold markets by Marc Rich in combination with
large financial forces, as well as tied to huge illicit funds money laundered
by the Bush family in combination with Bill Clinton as their
little-publicized crony and confederate.

In the letter, our editorial comments to update those who might not be
knowledgeable are in brackets. Visit our website story for more details on
the how and why murder of Foster, "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush Family".

THE LETTER, verbatim as received

22nd day of January, 2001 A.D.
To U.S. President George W. Bush U.S.
Vice President Richard (Dick) Cheney
U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno
U.S. Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder
U.S. Federal Judge David L. Russell
U.S. White House Counsel Bernie Nausbaum [Clinton White House]
Estate/U.S. W/H Deputy Counsel Vince Foster, Jr. U.S. DoJ Attorney-
John Russell S.E.C. Chairman,
Arthur Levitt Dresdner Banque,
COB, Bernhard Walter Deutche Banque AG,
COB, Rolf-Ernst Brewer Georgio Bomio, Esquire
Central Authority for U.S. Requests Division of International Legal
Assistance Federal Office For Police Matters Bundesrain 20, 3003 Bern,
Switzerland Credit Suite, COB Guy Studor, et al Former Director/FBI William
Sessions [who was sacked on flimsy grounds the day before Foster was
murdered]
SAC Bill Lecates
SAC Glen Speedy
SAC Jeb McGruder
SAC Gary Small [followed by bracket, identifying them] Section V [asterisk
after Speedy identifying him as]U.S. Secret Service, Nashville, TN, USA U.S.
DoJ C.L. Ford, Esq. cc Frank B. Ingram (FBI SA 32 NY)
U.S. Dept. of the Treasury/U.S. Custom Service Rick Reynolds (S.E. Asia ops
SA 233 MS) U.S. Dept. of the Treasury/U.S. Customs Service
 _[name left out]/(S-31-IANO) U.S. Dept. of the Treasury Office
of Internal Affairs/Sector V-New Orleans

FROM Ambassador Leo E. Wanta/Stillpoint.ops Diplomatic Passport No. 04362 
12535 Ministry of Foreign Affairs

IN THE MATTER OF (A) MARC RICH- Visit in Lausanne, Switzerland at Hotel Au
Lac with Ms Lorrayne Fine (1) of L.H. Financial(Tel Aviv  Johannesburg, SA);
(2) of Ameritrust Corporation (USA) as Corporate Secretary  Account
Signatorie at Credit Suisse, Lausanne, Switzerland; (3) of Ameritrust
(Suisse) Societe as Director and Corporate Co-Ordinator with Suisse Banque-
as to Private Contract between Humewood Enterprises (London  Dublin) and
Ameritrust Corporation (USA) for Prime Banque Guartanees (PABag/icc
400/500/600)- Aggregate Amount of US Dollars Five Trillion with rollovers and
extensions- as authorized by U.S. Government entities-and International
Banking Groupe, et al.--

Marc Rich at Hotel Au Ladc Lausanne further discussed the scheduled meeting
with Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster, Jr. on 07 July 1993, as to
(1) Children's Defense Fund "set-aside" allocations of US Dollars Two Hundred
and Fifty Million (US $ 250,000,000.00), through Credit Suisse Banque, Agent
for Ameritrust Corporation (USA); [see our website story, New/Old White House
Gang] (2) Suisse newlly-organized "AmeriTrust (Suisse) Societe" to meet
Suisse Tax Regulations, as to PBG transactions as authorized under Title 18
USA Sec.6/USG Proprietary Corporations- and endorsed through USGovt entities.
(3) New lodging at Hotel de la Pax, Geneva for (07 July 1993) (A) Vince
Foster Groupe (B) Frank B. Ingram (SA 32 NV) (C) Rick Reynolds (SA 233 MS)
(D) Consul General Giovanni Ferro (E) Italia Judge Pierre Liugi (F) Italia
Secret Police Erika Ruffo (G) Somalia President Haji Mohammed Hashi Haile of
Mogedishij, et al (H) Ms Lorrayne Fine (Mossad) and her daughter from
Johannesburg SA (I) Banque Paribas Vice Chairman, Antonio Salvatorie, et al.

When U.S. Treasury Rick Reynolds observed Marc Rich on Lorrayne's Hotel
Patio; no one was certain that Lorrayne had advised him of
Reynolds/Ingram/Wanta planned attempts to travel by Laussane boat ferry
across to French Casino, 45 minutes across Lake- with L. Fine, g. Ferro,
Fine's daughter, L. Wanta, et al.

Please Note FBI Director William Sessions had authorized this groupe to take
Marc Rich, if and when, he was out of Switzerland for "tax evasion". Bill
Lecates also authorized F.B. Ingram to take down Marc Rich if the opportunity
came available. [Editorial note President Clinton by unceremoniously sacking
Sessions, the day before the later Foster murder, put a stop to FBI Director
William Sessions' elite unit investigating high criminal offenses by both
Clinton, former President George Herbert Walker Bush and his sons Neil, Jeb,
and George W., 

[CTRL] more PC privacy 2

2001-03-01 Thread byron wahl

-Caveat Lector-

--- byron wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:41:51 -0800 (PST)
 From: byron wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: PC privacy 2
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 --- byron r wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:15:16 -0800
  Subject: PC privacy 2
  From: byron r wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  ..more PC privacy
  2...

"flexy" from http://flexy.mastak.com/ cleans out
and pumps up temporary memory. RAM is drained
badly by some applications. flexy may? also whisk
away some hostile implants acquired online. It's
good, quick and easy.
 
  Reading online data concerning computer and
 internet
  communication
  privacy leaves me feeling somewhat discouraged.
  Apparently it doesn't
  really exist. The multi-billion dollar
 corporations
  don't trust anything,
  period. The best they can do is to use very strong
  encryption and private
  lines.
 
  Some of the internet privacy freaks and
  techno-supergeeks resort to
  "proxy servers" which render the user kind of
  invisible-like to his ISP.
   The proxy mode of access is hard to understand
 let
  alone install, tweak,
  and actually use. It involves a mysterious
 something
  called an "external
  shell" which is regarded as essential for secure,
 or
  maybe almost-secure,
  operations. In any case, the use of these methods
  amounts to waving a red
  flag in the face of your service provider since
 they
  are the
  self-appointed guardians of our sexual purity and
  national insecurity.
 
  The use of encryption isn't regarded with such
 dark
  suspicion because it
  has become a normal part of doing internet
 business.
  If it's good for
  business it must be OK. And of course encryption
  always has a "back-door"
  to facilitate fedbeast's access to our most
 private
  affairs.
 
  The easiest smoke-screen to operate behind is
  probably the time-honored
  anonymous web-surfing provider. The swiftest and
  least commercialized
  anonymous surfer I've found so far may be found at

  www.safeweb.com  and
  it's a joy to use. For the encrypted anonymous
 email
  remailer try
  www.all-nettools.com/  -- both sites are mines of
  marvelous, much-needed
  information.
 
  For the firewall probing packets blocker go to
  www.neoworx.com  and try
  their NeoWatch. I use Hack Tracer which is Sharp
  Technology and it's
  associated with Neoworx. Another one is the old
  standby Zone Alarm from
  Zone Labs -- it reports offenders' DNS numbers
  emanating from operatives
  not reported by the others and vice versa so I use
  two of them. It's
  amazing the hanky-panky going on all the time when
  you access the
  internet.
 
  After you get the DNS numbers of the probers enter
  those into SmartWhois
  downloaded from  www.tamos.com/  SmartWhois is
  incredibly fabulous. It
  really gets into the exact detail of who is trying
  to sneak their way
  into your computer.
  For instance, after posting my earlier comments on
  computers transmitting
  your credit card and PIN numbers to well-equipped
  spies in nearby
  buildings I experienced a probe event authored by
  the Sakura
  Bank-Internet online banking collossus in Osaka.
  They didn't get very
  far. Their probing packets attempted to enter via
 a
  very obscure port
  normally used for nothing.
 
  As we all know, cookies and history should be
  expunged before going
  online. Also, the program Kleen-It downloaded from

  www.overware.com
  removes the files implanted by Microbloat, online
  service providers, and
  other miscreants -- files which virus scans can't
  scan so we shouldn't
  have them hanging around on our hard disk. Trojans
  are not detected by
  anti-virus scans. Trojans can wreak havoc. You can
  download a Sub7 Trojan
  detector/expunger -- use a search engine to locate
  it.  Sub7 works as a
  .EXE  plague.
 
  One solution is simply to avoid having any serious
  data on the hard disk
  of your online computer. Sensitive data may be
 kept
  on an isolated
  computer which is never used to access the
 internet.
  Thermonuclear
  operatives use that method. The online computer
  should be periodically
  wiped clean and the operating system re-installed
  from scratch. This is
  easily done if you are using Windows98  (WIN98).
  This method nullifies
  surreptitious files, undetectable trojans etc etc
  which your security
  precautions failed to block. The probers will be
  attempting to enter a
  machine which features a big zero if they do
 manage
  to get inside. Only
  encrypted passwords should be stored on the hard
  disk. Never check yes
  for the Save Password? box when you login. Don't
  store credit card
  numbers on the hard disk, ever.
 
  A word of caution concerning Linux. If Linux is
  installed using the
  entire hard disk, i.e., Linux is the only
 operating
  system installed, you
  will not be able to drop Linux and 

Re: [CTRL] Miami Heralds recount results were sloppy, incomplete

2001-03-01 Thread lassey

-Caveat Lector-

Clack, clack, moan, moan, gripe, gripe, lie, lie, ...

Get over it.  Gore lost-THANK GOD! he lost!!!
Someone ought to take a look at N.Y, also.

==
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:37:06 -0800 radman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 -Caveat Lector-

 Tally no!  - Keep counting votes in Florida

 http://www.msnbc.com/news/536050.asp

 Miami Herald's recount results were sloppy, incomplete

 By Eric Alterman
 MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR
 Feb. 26, 2001

 The results are in. The hysterical anger and political maneuvering
 that
 prevented a final tally of the votes in Florida's presidential race
 was for
 naught. According to a recount of Miami-Dade County, led by the
 Miami
 Herald, a hand recount would have given Gore only another 49 votes
 there.
 EVEN WHEN added to the Gore vote tallies in Volusia, Palm Beach and
 Broward
 counties, Bush still comes out ahead by 140 votes. You would think
 this
 figure would finally end the 2000 election controversy. You would be
 wrong.
 The Herald and its parent company, Knight Ridder, retained a public
 accounting firm, BDO Seidman, LLP, to conduct the review. Spending
 more
 than 80 hours during a three-week period, the reporters and
 accountants
 examined every "undervote" separately and recorded their findings.
 Of course, each time the votes were counted they changed ever so
 slightly.
 The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is never so true as in the
 necessarily
 subjective case of vote counting. Hanging chads fall off, pregnant
 chads
 give birth, writing becomes smudged, etc.
UGLY LESSONS
 Unfortunately, the Herald recount proves only one thing: Al Gore and
 his
 campaign pursued a remarkably foolish and self-defeating
 post-election
 strategy. In picking only five counties in which to ask for a
 recount, the
 Gore campaign made two fatal mistakes. First, they gave the
 impression that
 they were hoping to cherry-pick the result by asking for recounts
 only in
 those counties where they had the most to gain. This played into
 Republican
 accusations that Gore was no more interested in a fair vote count
 than was
 Florida Secretary of State and Republican insider Katherine Harris;
 rather,
 Gore was arguably trying to lawyer himself into the presidency by
 hook and
 by crook.
 Second and most damning, this strategy was not only
 counter-productive from
 a public relations standpoint; it was destined to lose. Had Gore won
 with a
 five-county undercount-only strategy, this victory would likely have
 been
 overturned by the Florida legislature, or if necessary, the U.S.
 House of
 Representatives. And as we saw in the end, the Supreme Court was
 also
 willing to place its own credibility on the line in the end if there
 were
 no other way to overturn a questionable Gore victory.
 The only way for Gore to address all of these potential
 pitfalls would have been to undertake the strategy suggested in this
 space
 when the battle was still raging: to call for a full hand recount in
 Florida. A call for a complete recount would have provided a
 masterstroke
 of favorable publicity for the Gore team. What's more, according to
 the
 evidence available so far, it would have worked.
 When the Supreme Court made its final election ruling last December,
 one
 argument it gave for overturning the Florida high court's pro-Gore
 decision
 was the Florida court's refusal (at the Gore's team's request) to
 consider
 the 110,000 "overvotes," where a machine count recorded more than
 one vote
 for president. When examined by hand, however, many of these votes
 turned
 out to be legal, as both the punch card (or check mark) matched the
 name of
 the candidate written in.
 In late December, the Orlando Sentinel took a look at
 about 3,000 overvotes in Lake County. The paper found more than 600
 valid
 ballots that had been ignored by the machines, with Gore picking up
 130
 even in this heavily pro-Bush county. In late January the Chicago
 Tribune
 reported that in 15 Florida counties with a particularly high rate
 of
 overvotes, more than 1,700 votes that showed a clear choice had been
 discarded. Most of the counties in the Tribune's study were small,
 rural
 and predominantly Republican. Yet even so Gore's net gain was 366
 votes.  And a Washington Post review of the computer records of 2.7
 million
 votes in eight of Florida's largest counties reported that overvotes
 trended toward Gore at a rate of three to one.
EXPENSIVE WASTE OF TIME
 Add these together, even with the new undervote count, and Bush is
 back
 cutting brush in Crawford, Texas, while Al Gore is your new
 president. But
 because it chose to ignore these legal votes in its own recount, the
 Herald/Knight Ridder effort is an expensive waste of time, useless
 for
 everyone but Bush/Republican propagandists. It will be a test of the
 media
 to treat these results with the critical scrutiny they deserve. (One
 paper
 which has 

[CTRL] Denise Feds Meeting Talks may lead to deal for her

2001-03-01 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

 Denise  Feds Meeting Talks may lead to deal for her

By GREG B. SMITH
Daily News Staff Writer

enise Rich is talking with federal prosecutors about cooperating in their
investigation of whether her ex-husband bought a pardon with political
donations, the Daily News has learned.


Denise Rich (foreground) sings with Natalie Cole during appearance yesterday
on WKTU-FM radio show in Jersey City, where they were plugging their new
song, 'Livin' for Love.'
The talks are the first step in what could be a deal to aid federal
authorities probing the pardons-for-dollars scandal that has tainted
ex-President Bill Clinton's final days in the White House.

The flamboyant songwriting socialite met with prosecutors in Manhattan U.S.
Attorney Mary Jo White's office at least twice during the past few weeks,
said a source.

"She has been talked to on more than one occasion," said the source, adding
Rich attended the meetings with her lawyers.

The source would not say whether Rich has worked out a deal to cooperate —
and emphasized there is no indication that she has agreed to testify against
her ex-husband, Marc Rich, or to admit to any wrongdoing.

The meetings have been what one source described as "proffer" sessions. That
means a witness tells prosecutors what he or she knows in the hopes of
working out a deal to avoid prosecution. Prosecutors can agree not to use the
information against the witness unless the witness is caught lying.

Proffer sessions often result in a witness either getting immunity from any
prosecution — or agreeing to plead guilty to a crime in exchange for leniency
at sentencing.

The source, who is familiar with the investigation, could not say whether
Denise Rich and her lawyers have reached any agreement with White's office on
the question of immunity.

A spokesman for White, Marvin Smilon, and Denise Rich's lawyer, Martin
Pollner, declined to comment last night. Rich's spokesman, Howard Rubenstein,
also had no comment.

But Denise Rich's lawyers informed House of Representatives investigators
that she would invoke her Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate herself
when they asked her to appear before a committee looking into the Marc Rich
pardon.

That was an indication that she was trying to work out an immunity deal with
White.

Within the last two weeks, White has convened a grand jury that meets inside
Manhattan Federal Court to examine the circumstances surrounding Marc Rich's
pardon.

The pardon came after Denise Rich donated $1.1 million to the Democrats,
including Clinton and his wife, Hillary; gave $450,000 toward the Clinton
library, and visited the White House at least 13 times during Clinton's two
terms.

Marc Rich was indicted in 1983 on charges of dodging $48 million in taxes and
violating the Trading with the Enemy Act by buying oil from Iran during the
hostage crisis of 1979.

White wants to determine from Denise Rich whether Marc Rich, who renounced
his U.S. citizenship while he was a fugitive, made secret political donations
through her in an effort to win the pardon.

Thus far, the grand jury in Manhattan has subpoenaed documents pertaining to
all contributions or pledges to the Clinton library of more than $5,000, the
library's lawyers said Tuesday.

Two sources familiar with the investigation have said White also plans to
comb through the bank records of Denise Rich and her companies.

The revelation that Denise Rich is talking to the feds comes as the
songwriter, who has maintained a low profile since the pardon became a
scandal, showed up at a radio station in New Jersey.

She appeared on a morning radio show on WKTU-FM in Jersey City with singer
Natalie Cole to promote their new song, "Livin' for Love." But she made no
mention of the pardon scandal.

During the 45-minute broadcast, the subject of pardons came up only
indirectly when a deejay mentioned it.

"You're so different and so much more beautiful than they're portraying you,"
the deejay said. "Denise is a really good person."

Tonight, Denise Rich is scheduled to appear with Cole at the West Side club
Exit.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major 

[CTRL] FBI: Airport Solicitors Funded Terror

2001-03-01 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

FBI: Airport Solicitors Funded Terror
NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, March 1, 2001
LOS ANGELES (UPI) – A well-dressed group of Iranian expatriates who solicited
Asian travelers at the Los Angeles airport for donations to humanitarian
relief were funneling money to a violent terrorist group in Iraq, the FBI
said Wednesday in announcing the arrest of seven people.
The group of seven that represented itself in the corridors of Los Angeles
International Airport, or LAX, as Committee of Human Rights in Iran was
actually a cell of the Mujahedin-E Khalq, or MEK, which raised as much as
$10,000 a day to buy weapons, the FBI announced.

"Our investigation uncovered this cell of the MEK and led to yesterday's
arrest," FBI Special Agent James V. Desarno told reporters.

MEK has been in existence since 1965. It opposed the government headed by the
Shah, which was overthrown in 1979, and the Islamic regime that seized power
that year in Tehran.

"From the 1970s through the 1990s, the MEK staged terrorist attacks inside
Iran and killed several U.S. military personnel and civilians," the FBI said
in a release. "The MEK also participated in the takeover in 1979 of the U.S.
Embassy in Tehran."

More recently, MEK has been based in neighboring Iraq and has been concerned
more with propaganda rather than its occasional commando raids inside Iran.

Desarno said that MEK was a terrorist organization, and the money raised by
the Los Angeles suspects allegedly was used to buy mortars, rocket-propelled
grenades and other munitions.

Travelers landing at LAX, mainly people of Asian origin, were approached by
the suspects, who were dressed in business suits and carried photographs of
starving children and victims of atrocities allegedly committed by the
Iranian government. Desarno said the unwary travelers were "aggressively
solicited" for donations for humanitarian aid.

"They also aggressively solicited members of the Iranian community for
donations," he said.

Desarno said it was possible that the suspects, who were arraigned in federal
court Wednesday, did not know the money they collected was used for alleged
terrorist activities. However, the fact they were acting on behalf of MEK put
them on the wrong side of U.S. law.

"They are part of the same organization," Desarno said. "Anyone involved in
the support of a terrorist group is, in fact, a member of the terrorist
group."

The arrests were the result of an investigation, dubbed Operation Eastern
Money, that began three years ago as an offshoot of a money-laundering probe
by German police, Desarno said. The group allegedly transferred more than $1
million to two Turkish bank accounts, while $400,000 was wired to an auto
parts store in the United Arab Emirates.

"This transfer did not appear to be related to humanitarian relief," the FBI
said.

The suspects, all from Los Angeles, were identified as Tahmineh Tahamtan, 39;
Mustafa Ahmady, 46; Hossein Afshari, 43; Ali Reza Moradi, 30; Hassan Rezai,
46; Najaf Eshkoftegi, 50, and Mohammad Omidvar, 44.

Desarno said the investigation was continuing into similar solicitation
campaigns in other U.S. cities.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] PC privacy 3

2001-03-01 Thread byron wahl

-Caveat Lector-

--- byron wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 16:32:04 -0800 (PST)
 From: byron wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: more PC privacy 2
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 --- byron wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:41:51 -0800 (PST)
  From: byron wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: PC privacy 2
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  --- byron r wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:15:16 -0800
   Subject: PC privacy 2
   From: byron r wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  As a precaution, immediately following the clean

  re-install of WIN98, go to Zone Labs and
  download their firewall -- the process does not
  require the use of Winzip which you may install
  later. Also, be sure to run RegClean, another
  download available from many sources. It removes
  redundant registry entries -- it's essential if
  the operating system has been in use for a long
  time. It speeds up everything.

   ..more PC privacy
   2...

 "flexy" from http://flexy.mastak.com/ cleans out

 and pumps up temporary memory. RAM is drained
 badly by some applications. flexy may? also
 whisk
 away some hostile implants acquired online. It's
 good, quick and easy.
  
   Reading online data concerning computer and
  internet
   communication
   privacy leaves me feeling somewhat discouraged.
   Apparently it doesn't
   really exist. The multi-billion dollar
  corporations
   don't trust anything,
   period. The best they can do is to use very
 strong
   encryption and private
   lines.
  
   Some of the internet privacy freaks and
   techno-supergeeks resort to
   "proxy servers" which render the user kind of
   invisible-like to his ISP.
The proxy mode of access is hard to understand
  let
   alone install, tweak,
   and actually use. It involves a mysterious
  something
   called an "external
   shell" which is regarded as essential for
 secure,
  or
   maybe almost-secure,
   operations. In any case, the use of these
 methods
   amounts to waving a red
   flag in the face of your service provider since
  they
   are the
   self-appointed guardians of our sexual purity
 and
   national insecurity.
  
   The use of encryption isn't regarded with such
  dark
   suspicion because it
   has become a normal part of doing internet
  business.
   If it's good for
   business it must be OK. And of course encryption
   always has a "back-door"
   to facilitate fedbeast's access to our most
  private
   affairs.
  
   The easiest smoke-screen to operate behind is
   probably the time-honored
   anonymous web-surfing provider. The swiftest and
   least commercialized
   anonymous surfer I've found so far may be found
 at
 
   www.safeweb.com  and
   it's a joy to use. For the encrypted anonymous
  email
   remailer try
   www.all-nettools.com/  -- both sites are mines
 of
   marvelous, much-needed
   information.
  
   For the firewall probing packets blocker go to
   www.neoworx.com  and try
   their NeoWatch. I use Hack Tracer which is Sharp
   Technology and it's
   associated with Neoworx. Another one is the old
   standby Zone Alarm from
   Zone Labs -- it reports offenders' DNS numbers
   emanating from operatives
   not reported by the others and vice versa so I
 use
   two of them. It's
   amazing the hanky-panky going on all the time
 when
   you access the
   internet.
  
   After you get the DNS numbers of the probers
 enter
   those into SmartWhois
   downloaded from  www.tamos.com/  SmartWhois is
   incredibly fabulous. It
   really gets into the exact detail of who is
 trying
   to sneak their way
   into your computer.
   For instance, after posting my earlier comments
 on
   computers transmitting
   your credit card and PIN numbers to
 well-equipped
   spies in nearby
   buildings I experienced a probe event authored
 by
   the Sakura
   Bank-Internet online banking collossus in Osaka.
   They didn't get very
   far. Their probing packets attempted to enter
 via
  a
   very obscure port
   normally used for nothing.
  
   As we all know, cookies and history should be
   expunged before going
   online. Also, the program Kleen-It downloaded
 from
 
   www.overware.com
   removes the files implanted by Microbloat,
 online
   service providers, and
   other miscreants -- files which virus scans
 can't
   scan so we shouldn't
   have them hanging around on our hard disk.
 Trojans
   are not detected by
   anti-virus scans. Trojans can wreak havoc. You
 can
   download a Sub7 Trojan
   detector/expunger -- use a search engine to
 locate
   it.  Sub7 works as a
   .EXE  plague.
  
   One solution is simply to avoid having any
 serious
   data on the hard disk
   of your online computer. Sensitive data may be
  kept
   on an isolated
   computer which is never used to access the
  internet.
   Thermonuclear
   operatives use that 

[CTRL] Europeans view Bush as a thief who has brought shame on America

2001-03-01 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

 From: alt.activism

 Europeans view Bush as a thief who has brought shame on America

 By Linda Stout Deak

 WASSENAAR, The Netherlands, Feb. 27, 2000.

 €?When Condoleeza Rice, Bush's National Security Advisor appointee,
 took her place at the microphone in those numbing first days after the
 coup d'“tat, she called herself a Europeanist. What is that? I
 wondered if she played the piano in Europe. I believe she meant that
 her studies had focused on Europe and she considered herself an expert
 on Europe.

 I am American living abroad. Both sides of my family are deeply rooted
 in America and I have lived in nine states. I love America. I am
 married to a Canadian who is also a European. I have lived in Europe
 twice, a total of fourteen years and I have lived in Canada once for
 five years. Our sons have been educated in European and Canadian
 schools. I have many European friends, family members, acquaintances
 and contacts. The Europeans, as do the Canadians, teach me a lot about
 how America is perceived from the outside.

 It is surprising to a friendly, open, swashbuckling American to feel
 the contempt that so many others feel for us. I think you have to be
 on the outside of the country to understand what I am referring to
 here. The Canadians let me know shortly after I landed there, that I
 was not to consider myself a Canadian. After some years I understood
 why. They had always been kind of folded into America in most American
 minds. Many Americans view Canada in the same way they view California
 as a state, but one that is different, set apart.

 I grew to love Canada. They seemed to have the best of both Europe and
 the U.S. with the American sense of vastness and possibility and the
 European sense of social responsibility.

 Americans have a very limited notion or regard for world history and
 geography. The outsiders consider us dumb. Oh sure, we have our
 technology and bravado and friendly service, but most of us cannot
 separate the Balkans from the Baltics or Palma from Palermo.  Is
 Jakarta close to Madagascar? I daresay, in the shrinking world, we
 have done ourselves a disservice. The media's dumb-down has not been
 very helpful either.

 When I first resettled in Europe twelve years ago, I began language
 classes. I was the only American in my class. Each of us was from a
 different country. I sunk quickly to the bottom of the class. The
 others were learning their third or fourth language. I was a hopeless
 beginner. They were kind to me and helped me along with cheerful
 encouragement. Our topics of conversation were eye opening as I
 learned how very differently we perceived an issue or an event, coming
 from different cultures. When the teacher put the topic of "Do you
 consider the Dutch to be dirty?" forward, I was stunned at how the
 entire group turned to me with real anger about the excesses of the
 Americans in this regard. Did I understand how much of the world's
 resources we use and how unnecessary daily showers are? And, Why do we
 do that? And, What was I going to do about that?

 Gradually, I became good friends with more than a few Europeans and I
 came to understand and respect the differences. In friendship, one
 becomes privy to inner thoughts and foibles. Just as Americans
 experience the Americanization of newcomers to our country, this new
 culture began to seep

 into me.

 When I go to a tourist magnet, like Lago Maggiore or Paris or Bruges,
 I notice the Americans who usually huddle against the foreignness of
 their strange environment. The glories of Rome go unnoticed if ice is
 unavailable for the Diet Coke. They are often full of complaints that
 the place is not America and they make matters worse by demanding that
 it cater specifically to their American idea of how things should be.
 There is a very real difference in attitude to money and the Americans
 cannot believe that profit doesn't hold the same motivational internal
 whir. The Europeans believe it is crass to flaunt wealth. It takes a
 while to pick up on the nuances of culture.

 In contrast, the Europeans are very aware of America and probably even
 speak our language. The balance is off because of this. We still
 condescend to all cultures as if they were lesser, and it does not
 make us very likeable.

 My European friends and contacts, almost to the man, were in support
 of Al Gore winning this election. I have asked more than a few of my
 friends who are located in other parts of Europe and they report the
 same phenomena.  I do know that straw polls gave Bush and Ralph Nader
 each seven percent. Most of the Bush-supporter spottings have been in
 England.  England is not really full-heartedly a supporter of the
 European Union and their ties to America have always been special.
 Shortly after the Revolution ended, the British shook hands and got
 back to the business of trading and envoying with our country. The
 Atlantic Ocean, for them, has often been narrower 

[CTRL] Ooooh scary! Maybe not.

2001-03-01 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

2/28/01

9.3 billion people can be comfortably accommodated on this
planet. BUT NOT WITH CAPITALISM AS ITS ECONOMIC SYSTEM.

Get rid of Capitalism and you get rid of waste. Get rid
of Capitalism and you free up resources held and controlled
by a very few. Get rid of Capitalism and you can decentralize
economic power, thus returning democratic power to more
people in the developed countries.

Once these countries are democratically controlled, other
countries could develop as they need to and see fit.

The ONLY VOLUNTARY proven and demonstrable weapon against
overpopulation, IS ACHIEVING MIDDLECLASS-HOOD. This is
not possible in a system which encourages concentration of
wealth. Where, as in the US, 1% of the population owns 40%
of its wealth.

But the beneficiaries of such a system won't give up their
spot at the trough. So instead, they try every other available
method to reduce the numbers of poor. None of which achieve
the desired effect.

You simply can't have Capitalism AND a livable planet with
9.3 billion inhabitants. Our children and grand children.

Will they bless or curse your memory? It depends on what you
leave them.

Joshua2


Wednesday February 28 6:32 PM ET
World to Be More Crowded, Older, Poorer in 2050

By Irwin Arieff

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The world will be far more
crowded by midcentury, its people older and poorer
than they are today, the United Nations' chief
demographer said on Wednesday.

Over the next 50 years, the world's population will
likely soar to 9.3 billion from 6.1 billion, although
it could be as high as 10.9 billion or as low as 7.9
billion, said
Joseph Chamie, director of the U.N. Population
Division.

Of the total, 88 percent, or 8.2 billion people, will
live in developing nations, compared to 80 percent, or
4.9 billion people, today, Chamie told a news
conference.

Most of the growth will come in Asia and Africa, while
the world's wealthy nations, where about 1.2 billion
people now live, are expected as a group to remain
about the same size or even shrink a bit as birth
rates stay below replacement level, he said.

Therefore, the richest nations' share of the global
total will shrink to 12 percent by 2050 from the
current 20 percent, Chamie said, elaborating on his
division's latest
report on ''World Population Prospects.''

Just six African and Asian nations, India, China,
Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh and Indonesia, will
account for half the world's growth between now and
2050, he
said.

Within the group of industrialized nations, however,
there are sharp divergences. In contrast to most other
wealthy nations, the United States will grow rapidly
over
the next five decades, soaring to 400 million people
from 283 million last year because of a relatively
high birth rate and a steady flow of immigrants.

Canada and Australia are also expected to increase in
size, while Japan and Europe will be shrinking, Chamie
said.

Although AIDS is having a devastating impact on life
expectancy and population loss in the 45 mostly
African countries hardest hit by the epidemic, those
countries'
overall population will nonetheless grow steadily over
the next 50 years.

Growth is predicted even in Botswana, where the AIDS
infection rate is 36 percent, and in Swaziland and
Zimbabwe, where infections rates hover above 25
percent.

But South Africa, whose fertility rate is lower than
its neighbors, will shrink between 2010 and 2025
before growing again between 2025 and 2050.

Ranks Of The World's Elderly Will Mushroom

The ranks of the world's elderly will mushroom over
the next 50 years, with the number of people age 60 or
older jumping by 2050 to nearly 2 billion, 33 percent
of
the total population, from 606 million, or 20 percent,
today.

The number of people age 80 or over will rise to 379
million by 2050, accounting for 4 percent of the total
world population and more than five times as numerous
as the 69 million people aged 80 or over alive in
2000.

This trend will hit the rich nations hardest, causing
labor shortages and sending health care and pension
costs through the roof in Europe and Japan, Chamie
said.

But the labor market will be less affected in the
United States because it welcomes about 1.1 million
immigrants a year.

With the population growing so rapidly in the
developing world, Africa and Asia will be more
urbanized, ``with mega-cities growing largely in
developing countries,''
Chamie said. ``And finally, we will see a world more
ethnically and culturally diverse than today,'' he
added.

``Rapidly growing populations have less time to
prepare for change,'' Chamie said. ``These pressures
and strains are creating all kinds of challenges for
governments,'' he said, ranging from reassessments of
pension requirements and the retirement age to health
care budgets and immigration policy.



Sources:  Reuters  |  AP  |  AP U.S.  |  The New York
Times  |  ABCNEWS.com

A 

[CTRL] Finally getting smart: Arabs boycott Estee Lauder.

2001-03-01 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

 Original Message 
Subject: Arabs call for boycott of Estee Lauder
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:34:35 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Arabs call for boycott of Estee Lauder
- Original Message -
From: "amjerusalem" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 5:56 PM
Subject: [jerusalem-net] AMJ's Press Conference on Estee Lauder Boycott


In the Name of God, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful

American Muslims for Jerusalem
208 G Street, NE
Suite 100
Washington, DC 20002
Phone: (202) 548-4200
Fax: (202) 548-4201
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.amjerusalem.org

AMJ holds Press Conference to Announce Estee Lauder Boycott

On Wednesday, February 28, American Muslims for Jerusalem (AMJ) lead a
coalition of advocacy organizations in a press conference calling for a
worldwide boycott of cosmetics giant Este Lauder. That announcement was
prompted by Este Lauder International Chairman Ronald Lauder's activities
in support of Israeli right-wing extremists.

Estee Lauders products include: Estee Lauder line of perfume and make-up,
Aramis,  Clinique, Aveda, DKNY and Tommy Hilfegere toiletries products.
Estee Lauder also owns several lines of hair and skin care products and
shops such as M.A.C. and Origins.

Ronald Lauder is the Chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major
American Jewish Organizations and President of the Jewish National Fund
(JNF).  JNF is a quasi-government agency whose main function is to
legitimize Israeli's theft of Palestinian land.

In January, Lauder was the key speaker from the US at a rally in Jerusalem,
organized by right wing Israeli politician Natan Sharansky. The rally was
organized to oppose the mere consideration of Jerusalem as a negotiation
item. Lauder addressed 300,000 Israeli extremists at the gates of Haram
Al-Sharif (the Noble Sanctuary, one of Islam's three holiest sites). Some of
the protesters tried to break into the holy site.

Khalid Turaani, AMJ's Executive Director said "this boycott of Estee Lauder
will send a clear message that people of conscience refuse to do business
with corporations supporting Israeli apartheid policies which violate
internationally-recognized human rights".

In 1993, Lauder co-founded a think tank called the Shalem Center with Yoram
Hazony, a former Netanyahu aid. The Israeli Education Ministry has said the
center is "a research institute whose leanings are extreme right-wing and
even fascistic." Hebrew University professor Yisrael Bartal describes Hazony
as a right-wing extremist. A columnist for the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz
(9/14/2000) wrote that Hazony is a sympathizer of the slain radical Jewish
leader Meir Kahane, who called for the expulsion of all Arabs from Israel.
The goal of Hazony, wrote the columnist, is to find new ways of "breathing
life into Kahane's racist, totalitarian, intolerant ideology."

Ronald Lauder's Jerusalem-rally speech came at a time when the Israeli
government was waging a campaign of siege and starvation against the entire
Palestinian population. While Mr. Lauder supports some legitimate charitable
causes in the US, he shows his true colors when abroad by supporting fanatic
causes that seek to uproot an entire population from its native land.
Lauder is also opposed to permitting Palestinian refugees to return to their
homes. "For Israel to allow these people to return would be national
suicide," he said in a statement last September. In contrast, the UN General
Assembly has demanded that Israel allow the Palestinian refugees to return
since 1948. "Lauder's opposition to the return of Palestinian refugees in
order to maintain the pure-Jewish identity of Israel is nothing short of
apartheid at its worst" said Turaani.


American Muslims for Jerusalem
208 G Street NE
Suite 100
Washington, DC 20002
Phone: (202) 548-4200
Fax: (202) 548-4201
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.amjerusalem.org




IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website: www.imra.org.il

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of

[CTRL] Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss. Foriegn policy doesn't change with the parties.

2001-03-01 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Subject: PEACEWATCH #309: ASSESSING POWELL'S TRIP TO ISRAEL AND THE
PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY


 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE'S SPECIAL REPORTS ON THE ARAB-ISRAELI PEACE
PROCESS
 Number Three Hundred and Nine February 27, 2001

 ASSESSING POWELL'S TRIP TO ISRAEL AND THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY

 By David Makovsky

 While the main purpose of Secretary of State Colin Powell's first foray
into
 the Middle East was to discuss Iraq, he also visited Israel and the
 Palestinian Authority and injected a dose of what some would call
 "evenhandedness"--giving each both something to be pleased about and
 something to be unnerved about.

 Powell did not please Israelis completely as he did not specifically
endorse
 Israel's policy of closures to handle the intifada, and he used
Palestinian
 terminology in calling for a "lifting of the siege." Moreover, he did not
 assign blame for the ongoing violence, nor did he distinguish between the
 types of killing. Israel says there is a difference between, on the one
 hand, selectively targeting Hamas, Hizballah, or Tanzim activists who are
 responsible for killing innocent civilians and, on the other hand, the
 actions of a Palestinian bus driver who plowed into a bus stop full of
 unsuspecting travelers.  Israeli officials privately --so far not
publicly,
 in order not to offend Powell--term such an approach of failing to
 distinguish between these acts as one of moral equivalence. At the same
 time, the Palestinians could not be happy that Powell accepted Israeli
 sequencing in the peace process, whereby he declared a reduction of
violence
 was a precondition for resumption of peace negotiations. This position was
 at odds with the Clinton administration, and the Barak government for that
 matter, which pressed talks further despite the ongoing violence. Taken
 together, these two principles could show the embryonic form of the Bush
 administration's policy on the peace process: siding with the Palestinians
 on economic--and perhaps even symbolic--matters, while siding with Israel
on
 the proper context of diplomacy. Some of the main points of the Powell
visit
 include:

 Evenhandedness
 While the intifada is heading into its sixth month, Israel has viewed the
 Palestinian violence as an illegitimate effort orchestrated by the
 Palestinian Authority (PA) to use force as a means to alter negotiating
 terms for final status negotiations. In recent weeks, Israel has
reportedly
 brought substantial evidence to the CIA and other branches of the U.S.
 government to back up its contention that the PA stands behind the
killings.
 On the other hand, the PA has publicly claimed that the intifada is a
 popular uprising that expresses frustration with Israeli occupation. The
two
 sides differ both on motives and source of the violence, and even on
whether
 the killings of the two sides are comparable.

 Powell apparently decided to avoid all these issues of contention. During
 his Middle East trip, Powell consistently bemoaned the ongoing violence,
but
 never went beyond his call for both sides to avoid an "escalation of
 violence." The Palestinians view this as a victory that they hope
represents
 a departure from the policies of the Clinton administration, which they
have
 called "one sided."

 Furthermore, Powell made clear that he was not happy with Israel's closure
 policy in the territories, and in honor of Powell's arrival, Israel lifted
 some check-posts that divided the Gaza Strip. (The check-posts were
imposed
 last week after mortar shells were fired at a Jewish settlement in Gaza.)
At
 his joint press conference with Chairman Yasir Arafat, Powell said, "I
also
 want to express my deep concern for the dire economic situation that
 everyday Palestinians must bear. . . We discussed how it is necessary to
 lift the siege as soon as possible so that economic activity can begin
again
 in the region." Israel has imported 30,000 foreign workers over the last
few
 months to make up for the shortage of Palestinian workers.

 Lowering Violence as a Precondition for Negotiations
 Yet, Powell did not just side with Palestinians. Speaking to reporters on
 the plane to Kuwait on Monday, Powell made clear in blunt remarks that he
 accepts Israeli prime minister-elect Ariel Sharon's condition that peace
 talks must be preceded by Palestinian efforts to quell intifada violence.
 Powell said peacemaking "does begin with a lowering of the violence. We
are
 at the beginning of a long hallway. . . and at the end is the negotiations
 for peace."  He added, "it's going to be some time before they can get
back
 to the negotiations, it seems to me." Powell said a reduction in violence
is
 "really the sine qua non to moving forward." During his visit, Powell
 repeatedly called for a restarting of security cooperation between Israel
 and the Palestinians.

 In contrast, the Palestinians have actively opposed any conditionality
 between halting violence and resuming peace talks. The 

Re: [CTRL] Cases of Swine Casting Pearls aka

2001-03-01 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Junes Response Pearls of Wisdom]

ALso consider that he knocked-up a virgin, and left Joseph to raise His
child   ;-)
June

Yep.  When an unmarried women gets pregnant, the popular vernacular calls that 
'getting knocked up'...

In Mary's case, she got knocked up by the Holy Ghost...

So what's your beef?


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Why Call It 'Intelligence?

2001-03-01 Thread William Shannon
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2001/03/01/009.html



Thursday, Mar. 1, 2001. Page 9 
Why Call It 'Intelligence?


'
By Pavel Felgenhauer


Last week FBI agent Robert Philip Hanssen was arrested in the United States 
and charged with spying for the Soviet Union and Russia for the last 15 
years. A spokesman for Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service, Boris Labusov, 
told Russian State Television: "We never comment on whether any specific 
person has or has not a relation to Russian special services." While speaking 
Labusov noticeably smirked and added that "the greatest achievements of 
intelligence services become public knowledge only after an exposure."

If Russian officials are trying to hide their alleged connection with 
Hanssen, they are doing a pretty lousy job of it. In fact, they seem to be 
quite proud of the idea that they had such an agent.

In the ’80s and ’90s, the Russians apparently managed to operate two highly 
successful moles, one in the FBI and one in the CIA: Hanssen and Aldrich 
Ames. Moscow obtained quite a lot of sensitive information from Ames and, 
allegedly, from Hanssen as well. It’s also virtually certain that Ames and 
Hanssen were not the only well-placed moles that Russia had in the West. 
Soviet intelligence was not only highly professional, but also remarkably 
successful. So why then did Moscow lose the Cold War?

A retired Russian intelligence official once told me that in the late ’70s, 
Russian military intelligence managed to acquire a package of highly secret 
documents revealing the true maximum production capacity of all U.S. heavy 
arms-making industrial plants. It turned out that the United States could not 
grossly expand tank and other heavy-weapons production even if the economy 
were put on a war footing and that the Soviet Union had a towering advantage 
in this field.

The spies who came up with this important intelligence were expecting bunches 
of medals, but were harshly reprimanded by their superiors instead. The 
documents were suppressed by the military chiefs and never reported to the 
Politburo.

The Soviet military-industrial chiefs were at that time conjuring a massive 
Western military threat in order to frighten the Kremlin into spending more 
on defense. They were deliberately fabricating yarns about U.S. military 
might and did not need any true information about American weaknesses.

The same thing was happening on the other side of the Cold War divide. At the 
end of the ’80s, the CIA estimated Soviet gross domestic product as almost 60 
percent of America’s. The agency portrayed Moscow not only as a military 
superpower — which it was in many aspects — but also as a modern industrial 
power, which it was not. As a result of such intelligence, the sudden 
political, military and industrial implosion of the Soviet empire came as a 
total surprise to the West.

Throughout the Cold War, both countries spent billions of dollars recruiting 
moles that were used to find and "neutralize" enemy moles, while truly 
important information was shoved aside as insignificant.

In 1995, for instance, the CIA produced a report that stated that no "rogue" 
state could develop intercontinental ballistic missiles within 15 years, and 
that if a threat of rogue ICBMs did develop, U.S. intelligence would detect 
it years in advance.

This report disturbed many Washington decision-makers, so Congress formed a 
special commission headed by Donald Rumsfeld, who is now secretary of 
defense. The purpose of this commission was to conjure a rogue ICBM threat 
out of thin air. In 1999, the Rumsfeld commission concluded that "North Korea 
and Iran will have an ICBM force to attack the U.S. in five years" and Iraq 
will have an ICBM force ready to attack the U.S. in 10 years or sooner.

Now, almost two years later, it’s obvious that the Rumsfeld report is a sham 
and that the original CIA estimates are correct. But who cares? Rumsfeld was 
appointed defense secretary because he is a good apparatchik who knows that 
the truth is whatever the party says it is.

For almost a year now, the Moscow elite has been anticipating, in accordance 
with intelligence reports, that the new Bush administration would be Russia’s 
best friend no matter what happened here. At the same time, the West is still 
waiting for President Vladimir Putin to reveal himself as the true liberal 
that he must be at heart. 

By now, though, both East and West must have disappointedly returned to the 
drawing board to think up new policies — which no doubt are based on the 
latest reports of their respective intelligence services.



Pavel Felgenhauer is an independent, Moscow-based defense analyst.





 


[CTRL] Last Thanksgiving Day I flew my small plane to Cuba...

2001-03-01 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

ANTHONY F. KIRKPATRICK IN BROTHERS TO THE RESCUE SHOOTDOWN:
http://www.miami.com/herald/content/opinion/opcol/digdocs/053380.htm

U.S. shares the blame

Last Thanksgiving Day I flew my small plane to Cuba loaded with medical
donations from the United States. To get permission, I had to overcome
considerable nervousness from Cuban authorities. They feared my flight would
open a way for more U.S.-sponsored provocation by private pilots, such as
the events that led to the shootdown of two planes by Cuba in 1996.
Although a United Nations investigation faulted Cuba for not using means,
such as more-effective radio communication, to avoid the shootdown, what has
not been widely re- ported is how the U.S. government might have prevented
the shootdown by enforcing its own laws. Now, five years later, the case is
in a Miami courtroom, where defense attorney Paul McKenna says that his
client, accused Cuban spy Gerardo Hernn- dez, is a scapegoat in the
shootdown and that Jos Basulto, the leader of the Brothers to the Rescue,
is really to blame. If convicted, Hernndez could receive a life sentence.

ILLEGAL EXPLOITS

The American public deserves to know all the facts about the shootdown. On
July 11, 1995, the Federal Aviation Administration met with Basulto and
warned him that if he violated Cubas territorial airspace, he would suffer
``serious consequences'' and that any violations would be ``vigorously
investigated.'' Yet two days later, Basulto was on Miami television bragging
about his illegal exploits, calling them ``civil disobedience.''

Viewers saw him ``roaring over Havana at rooftop level,'' as described by
the on-board TV reporter, dropping propaganda leaflets and religious medals,
which seriously could have injured people below. A Cuban fighter plane
flying above him took no action, even though Basulto was flying in a manner
later described by the FAA as reckless or careless ``so as to endanger the
life and property'' of others.

Unfortunately, the FAA failed to carry out any of its warnings. For example,
it delayed the investigation for more than a month while it translated Cubas
documentation of the incident, and it never contacted the journalist on
board Basultos plane.

We may never know if the tragic shootdown seven months later might have been
averted had the FAA exercised its authority to revoke Basulto's pilot's
license or seize his aircraft. Despite Cubas numerous warnings that it would
shoot down any intruding aircraft, the Brothers continued their efforts to
destabilize the Cuban government by flying into airspace controlled by Cuba
and dropping political leaflets into the island.

TOWARD HAVANA

On that ill-fated day, the pilots deviated from their filed flight plan
without notifying the aviation authorities. This deviation in flight plan
made the Cubans nervous because the aircraft were heading directly toward
Havana instead of along the coastline of Cuba as they had promised.

According to the U.N. report, the pilots acknowledged that they were warned
in Miami through the FAA and in the air by the Cubans that they would be
flying into airspace under Cuban control and ``activated'' by Cuban military
during that period. Although all three aircraft were equipped with
sophisticated GPS navigational systems, they intruded directly into the
activated area.

Basulto told the U.N. investigators that he did not violate Cuba's
territorial airspace, but the U.N. report states that radar recordings from
both countries showed otherwise. Basulto managed to evade a shootdown by the
Cuban military aircraft, but the other two aircraft were not as fortunate.

Rather than point the finger at the Brothers or the FAA for the shootdown,
the United States called on the U.N. to condemn Cuba, citing a provision
calling for countries to refrain from using weapons against civil aircraft.
That same provision was used to condemn the United States in 1988 for
shooting down an Iranian airliner, killing 290 passengers.

But the United States itself refuses to ratify the provision. Why? It would
require this country to prevent private pilots from using their aircraft to
carry out acts of aggression against other nations. Cuba ratified the
provision on Sept. 28, 1998.

What if the table were turned? Suppose that a known enemy from abroad was to
enter U.S. airspace in a small private plane heading toward Washington, D.C.
As several ``administration officials'' told The Washington Post, such an
intruder is likely to be shot down quickly over water before it enters the
United States because shooting down the plane over a populated area would
create ``significant risks to large numbers of innocent bystanders.''
Like the aviation incident, the United States is two-faced on health care,
too.

Why did I fly more than $1 million in medical donations to Cuba? Like the
aviation incident, the United States is two-faced about health care as well.

The U.S. embargo prevents about half of the most vital medicines from

[CTRL] Skolnick-MARK RICH and Others---FINGERED BY A LETTER

2001-03-01 Thread William Shannon
http://www.skolnicksreport.com/mrfingered.html


MARK RICH and Others---FINGERED BY A LETTER
MARC RIC
2/28/01 by Sherman H. Skolnick

The monopoly press reportedly is interested in a strange letter that has
surfaced. It names specific persons and events and it relates to the apparent
murder of Clinton White House Deputy Counsel Vincent W. Foster, Jr., July,
1993, the manipulation of the gold markets by Marc Rich in combination with
large financial forces, as well as tied to huge illicit funds money laundered
by the Bush family in combination with Bill Clinton as their
little-publicized crony and confederate. In the letter, our editorial
comments to update those who might not be knowledgeable are in brackets.
Visit our website story for more details on the how and why murder of Foster,
"Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush Family". THE LETTER, verbatim as received
22nd day of January, 2001 A.D. To U.S. President George W. Bush U.S. Vice
President Richard (Dick) Cheney U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno U.S. Deputy
Attorney General Eric Holder U.S. Federal Judge David L. Russell U.S. White
House Counsel Bernie Nausbaum [Clinton White House] Estate/U.S. W/H Deputy
Counsel Vince Foster, Jr. U.S. DoJ Attorney- John Russell S.E.C. Chairman,
Arthur Levitt Dresdner Banque, COB, Bernhard Walter Deutche Banque AG, COB,
Rolf-Ernst Brewer Georgio Bomio, Esquire Central Authority for U.S. Requests
Division of International Legal Assistance Federal Office For Police Matters
Bundesrain 20, 3003 Bern, Switzerland Credit Suite, COB Guy Studor, et al
Former Director/FBI William Sessions [who was sacked on flimsy grounds the
day before Foster was murdered] SAC Bill Lecates SAC Glen Speedy SAC Jeb
McGruder SAC Gary Small [followed by bracket, identifying them] Section V
[asterisk after Speedy identifying him as]U.S. Secret Service, Nashville, TN,
USA U.S. DoJ C.L. Ford, Esq. cc Frank B. Ingram (FBI SA 32 NY) U.S. Dept. of
the Treasury/U.S. Custom Service Rick Reynolds (S.E. Asia ops SA 233 MS) U.S.
Dept. of the Treasury/U.S. Customs Service _[name left
out]/(S-31-IANO) U.S. Dept. of the Treasury Office of Internal Affairs/Sector
V-New Orleans FROM Ambassador Leo E. Wanta/Stillpoint.ops Diplomatic Passport
No. 04362  12535 Ministry of Foreign Affairs IN THE MATTER OF (A) MARC RICH-
Visit in Lausanne, Switzerland at Hotel Au Lac with Ms Lorrayne Fine (1) of
L.H. Financial(Tel Aviv  Johannesburg, SA); (2) of Ameritrust Corporation
(USA) as Corporate Secretary  Account Signatorie at Credit Suisse, Lausanne,
Switzerland; (3) of Ameritrust (Suisse) Societe as Director and Corporate
Co-Ordinator with Suisse Banque- as to Private Contract between Humewood
Enterprises (London  Dublin) and Ameritrust Corporation (USA) for Prime
Banque Guartanees (PABag/icc 400/500/600)- Aggregate Amount of US Dollars
Five Trillion with rollovers and extensions- as authorized by U.S. Government
entities-and International Banking Groupe, et al.-- Marc Rich at Hotel Au
Ladc Lausanne further discussed the scheduled meeting with Deputy White House
Counsel Vincent Foster, Jr. on 07 July 1993, as to (1) Children's Defense
Fund "set-aside" allocations of US Dollars Two Hundred and Fifty Million (US
$ 250,000,000.00), through Credit Suisse Banque, Agent for Ameritrust
Corporation (USA); [see our website story, New/Old White House Gang] (2)
Suisse newlly-organized "AmeriTrust (Suisse) Societe" to meet Suisse Tax
Regulations, as to PBG transactions as authorized under Title 18 USA
Sec.6/USG Proprietary Corporations- and endorsed through USGovt entities. (3)
New lodging at Hotel de la Pax, Geneva for (07 July 1993) (A) Vince Foster
Groupe (B) Frank B. Ingram (SA 32 NV) (C) Rick Reynolds (SA 233 MS) (D)
Consul General Giovanni Ferro (E) Italia Judge Pierre Liugi (F) Italia Secret
Police Erika Ruffo (G) Somalia President Haji Mohammed Hashi Haile of
Mogedishij, et al (H) Ms Lorrayne Fine (Mossad) and her daughter from
Johannesburg SA (I) Banque Paribas Vice Chairman, Antonio Salvatorie, et al.
When U.S. Treasury Rick Reynolds observed Marc Rich on Lorrayne's Hotel
Patio; no one was certain that Lorrayne had advised him of
Reynolds/Ingram/Wanta planned attempts to travel by Laussane boat ferry
across to French Casino, 45 minutes across Lake- with L. Fine, g. Ferro,
Fine's daughter, L. Wanta, et al. Please Note FBI Director William Sessions
had authorized this groupe to take Marc Rich, if and when, he was out of
Switzerland for "tax evasion". Bill Lecates also authorized F.B. Ingram to
take down Marc Rich if the opportunity came available. [Editorial note
President Clinton by unceremoniously sacking Sessions, the day before the
later Foster murder, put a stop to FBI Director William Sessions' elite unit
investigating high criminal offenses by both Clinton, former President George
Herbert Walker Bush and his sons Neil, Jeb, and George W., little-known
business cronies of Clinton, as well as other top-level criminals jointly
with Bush/Clinton gang. The gang 

[CTRL] Oh no. Not again. 13 more days.

2001-03-01 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Russians may look to Cuba as reply to U.S. missile plan
http://www.miami.com/herald/content/news/carib/cuba/digdocs/092746.htm

`Some experts have taken up the issue following President Vladimir Putin's
trip to Cuba.'

-- YEVGENY MASLIN,

headed nuclear weapons department

MOSCOW -- (AP) -- If compromise isn't reached with the United States on the
national missile defense controversy, Russian military strategists are
considering potential responses, including sending missiles to Cuba, a
retired general said Thursday.

Yevgeny Maslin, who headed the Defense Ministry's nuclear weapons department
in the late 1990s, now works with the independent research institute
PIR-Center, was not speaking for the government, and there was no immediate
reaction from Russian officials to his statements about missiles in Cuba.

He said at a news conference that many in the Russian military appear to be
still locked into a Cold War mentality.

The Kremlin's 1962 move to base missiles in Cuba was one of the Cold War
period's tensest crises, until the Soviet Union backed off.

Now, Moscow and Washington again are in dispute over missiles -- this time
over the United States' intention to build a national missile shield system
that Russia says would wreck the global strategic security balance.

Russia this week offered the outline of an alternative and officials are
voicing hope of a compromise.

But strategists are also pondering what to do if the United States starts
building the shield, which Washington says is needed to protect against
attacks by small countries that may be developing nuclear capability.

President Vladimir Putin said last year that Moscow may opt out of existing
arms control agreements if the United States goes ahead with the system.

``There is even such an exotic option as the deployment of some necessary
weapons in Cuba,'' Maslin said. ``Some experts have taken up the issue
following President Vladimir Putin's trip to Cuba.''

When Putin visited the old Soviet ally in December, he and Fidel Castro
spoke about revival of the political and economic ties that withered after
the Soviet collapse, but never mentioned resuming military cooperation.

Moscow still maintains an electronic spying facility in Lourdes, Cuba, that
eavesdrops on U.S. communications.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] From the Mughty Wurlitzer: CIA disinformation.

2001-03-01 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Brothers plane shoot-down a Castro trap?
http://www.miami.com/herald/content/news/local/dade/digdocs/074817.htm

BY ALFONSO CHARDY
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Five years after the downing of two Brothers to the Rescue planes by a Cuban
MiG, evidence is emerging in a Miami courtroom suggesting the shoot-down was
no crime of opportunity, but part of a carefully plotted trap meant to
discredit and destroy the anti-Castro group.

Today marks the fifth anniversary of the shoot-down -- a moment that comes
just as testimony in the Cuban spy trial begins to underscore the deep
suspicions Castro foes in Miami long harbored about Cuban government
intentions.

Documents submitted by federal prosecutors as evidence, like once-secret
computer and radio messages between the alleged spies and their Havana
handlers, chronicle efforts by Havana's agents to sabotage Brothers to the
Rescue and pave the way for an ambush in which two Brothers pilots and two
rafter spotters were killed.

CONSPIRACY?

In fact, U.S. prosecutors say, evidence points to a conspiracy involving
Havana and one of the alleged spies to set up the Brothers pilots.

The charge also seems to validate a theory initially floated by Brothers
leader Jos Basulto days after the shoot-down that the event was the outcome
of a Cuban covert operation to connect Brothers to anti-Castro terrorism.
According to Basulto, Cuba had planned to claim that the Brothers planes had
been shot down while en route to an airstrike on Cuba.

Basulto is a witness in the trial in which five alleged Cuban spies are
fighting charges of trying to infiltrate U.S. military installations and
Cuban exile organizations including Brothers to the Rescue for the purpose
of harming U.S. national security.

``What is clear from the trial is that Brothers to the Rescue were set up
and that murder was committed,'' said Joe Garcia, executive director of the
Cuban American National Foundation, which also was allegedly targeted by the
spy suspects. ``The trial shows an ongoing effort by the Cuban government to
create dissension and strife among those who fight for freedom and democracy
for Cuba.''

FIGHTING TERROR

The accused spies claim they were merely working to protect their homeland
from acts of terrorism by the Brothers.

One of the defendants, Gerardo Hernndez, is charged with conspiracy to
commit murder in the shoot-down. Attorneys for Hernndez and his
co-defendants do not dispute that their clients worked for the Cuban
government. But they told jurors that the men spied on military
installations and infiltrated exile groups to protect Cuba -- not to
compromise national security.

One of Havana's spies inside Brothers, Juan Pablo Roque, reported to one of
his Cuban handlers and the FBI that Basulto had mentioned plans to
manufacture a ``secret weapon'' for delivery to island-based anti-Castro
foes, according to prosecution evidence. The court document says neither
Cuba nor the FBI took the report seriously.

Most of the evidence submitted by the prosecution portrays Brothers to the
Rescue as a target for the Cuban government.

The recently declassified computer and radio messages between the alleged
spies and their Havana handlers, for example, detail elaborate efforts to
set up Brothers for the shoot-down -- including arrangements for Roque's
secret return to Cuba on the eve of the shoot-down.

SIMILAR TO THEORY

The operation laid out in the messages resembles Basulto's theory that Cuba
shot down the Brothers planes to smear the group's reputation. Basulto says
Cuba had planned to present Roque, the infiltrated Brothers pilot, as sole
shoot-down survivor and have him describe details of the ``terrorist''
mission.

The only reason the plot failed, Basulto said, is that he survived the
shoot-down by turning off his plane's transponder and flying into a cloud to
evade a pursuing MiG.

Roque disappeared from Miami on the eve of the Brothers' fateful flight --
reappearing in Havana after the shoot-down and disclosing that he had
infiltrated Brothers to the Rescue. Roque is now a fugitive in the spy case.

As it unfolds, evidence emerging suggests that Cuba may have dispatched
spies to South Florida after concluding that Washington was not taking
seriously its demands to crack down on exile ``terrorists'' and incursions
into Cuban airspace by Brothers planes.

CUBAN FEARS

The creation of Brothers to the Rescue in early 1991 and Basulto's role in
the group played a major part in Havana's fears. Many exiles who had
received paramilitary training in the early 1960s when the CIA financed the
ill-fated Bay of Pigs invasion went into action again in the 1990s.

Some sponsored raids against the Cuban coast. Others staged attacks at
tourist sites. Still others opted for nonviolent protests such as
pro-democracy flotillas -- and among organizers of the first flotilla on May
20,1990 was Basulto -- a Bay of Pigs veteran.

Cuba's suspicions about the organization intensified and soon thereafter,

Re: [CTRL] Is the party over for Chelsea?

2001-03-01 Thread BB

-Caveat Lector-

Prudy, what the hell are you talking about???  Do you know???

As for my own 5 grown children, they are probably older than you.

Get that huge chip off your shoulder and civilize up.

I'm about fed up with you and you cohorts and your rude and nasty
remarks, trying to fight everybody and everything.

Get a life.

BB

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Is the party over for Chelsea?

2001-03-01 Thread BB

-Caveat Lector-

Prudy, what the hell are you talking about???  Do you know???

As for my own 5 grown children, they are probably older than you.

Get that huge chip off your shoulder and civilize up.

I'm about fed up with you and you cohorts and your rude and nasty
remarks, trying to fight everybody and everything.

You cannot even recognize an ally when you see one --  your constant
nastiness, rudeness, and whining are truly becoming tiresome.

Get a life.

BB

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fw: MRC's Latest Analysis Online

2001-03-01 Thread A Szul

-Caveat Lector-

Sign up box at http://www.mrc.org/MRCwebnews.html
or send a blank e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I like these update b/c they're short and provide links directly to the info

- Original Message -
From: Media Research Center IS Staff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 05:10 PM
Subject: MRC's Latest Analysis Online


 
 MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER WEB SITE NEWS - http://www.mrc.org
 Daily updates on the latest analysis available at the MRC Web site

 Subscribe today at http://www.mrc.org/MRCwebnews.html
 *


 Our Latest Analysis - March 1, 2001
 ~~~

 CYBERALERT
 CBS Spiked Pro-Tax Cut Poll; ABC Focused on Budget Cut "Pain"; Dan
 Rather: Bush Cut Earthquake Help; Public Radio Censorship

 - A CBS News poll found 67 percent support Bush's tax cut plan, but
 Wednesday night the CBS Evening News ignored its own poll. Instead, Dan
 Rather characterized it as "risky business" while John Roberts
 highlighted a woman in Omaha who "fears" Bush "is rolling the dice on
 eight years of success."
 (For more, see
 http://www.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/2001/cyb20010301.asp#1)

 - FNC's Brit Hume noted: "A CBS poll of those who saw" Bush's speech
 "found 88 percent agreed with the Bush proposals, which anchor Dan
 Rather had characterized as quote, 'a
 cut-federal-programs-to-get-a-tax-cut plan.'"
 (For more, see
 http://www.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/2001/cyb20010301.asp#2)

 - ABC's Terry Moran focused on how Bush's budget will cause "pain."
 Moran listed the Department of Transportation as one of the "big
 losers," citing a $2 billion cut, but the Washington Post reported the
 department had done "spectacularly under the budget proposal."
 (For more, see
 http://www.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/2001/cyb20010301.asp#3)

 - Dan Rather: "This earthquake hit on the same day President Bush
 proposed a federal budget that would save about $25 million by killing a
 program" to help communities prepare for earthquakes.
 (For more, see
 http://www.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/2001/cyb20010301.asp#4)

 - Intolerant liberals. An Arkansas public radio station dropped
 conservative commentator Paul Greenberg, but kept his liberal
 counterpart, when donors complained.
 (For more, see
 http://www.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/2001/cyb20010301.asp#5)

 - Letterman's "Top Ten Answers to the Question, 'How Boring Was George
 W. Bush's Speech?'"
 (For more, see
 http://www.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/2001/cyb20010301.asp#6)


 *Get Free CyberAlert Via E-mail*
 Sign up at http://www.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/cybersub.html
 ***

 *For More Analysis, Visit CyberAlert Archives*
 Go to http://www.mrc.org/news/cyberalert/2001/Welcome.html

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Clintons wife is not Trashy shes a U.S.Senator ( by Steve Wilson Republican)

2001-03-01 Thread Steve Wilson
Have some Respect Im aRepublican but cmon theres enough nasty stuff going on.
Shes good looking and educated.


[CTRL] party over for Chelsea? Respect for the previous first family Steve Wilson

2001-03-01 Thread Steve Wilson
Lets have some Respect for the first family.Im a Republican. What about
mindcontrol and implants and UFOs?


Re: [CTRL] Fw: MRC's Latest Analysis Online

2001-03-01 Thread BB

-Caveat Lector-

John Roberts  highlighted a woman in Omaha who "fears" Bush "is rolling
the dice on  eight years of success."

**

If the last 8 years were such a "success", why is the economy shaky and
bordering on recession, why is the military gutted, with every branch finding
it difficult to keep service personnel, WHY are Social Security and Medicare
on the verge of bankruptcy, WHY are gasoline prices the highest in our history,
with NO explanation ever forthcoming, why are natural gas and heating oil prices
going through the roof, and why are parts of the country now finding that they no

longer have even enough electricity for normal infrastructure purposes???

None of these issues bode well for arguing that the country and the
economy have been well managed for the last several years.

BB

A Szul wrote:

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Clintons wife is not Trashy shes a U.S.Senator ( by Steve Wilson Republican)

2001-03-01 Thread Damian B. Cooper

-Caveat Lector-

At 11:49 PM 3/1/01 -0500, Steve Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:

 Have some Respect Im aRepublican but cmon theres enough nasty stuff going on.

 Shes good looking and educated.


You forgot to mention:

She's also a narcissist, a megalomanic, a sociopath, a kleptomanic, a thief, a
swindler, a grifter, a liar, a tax cheat, a lesbian, and a Marxist.

DBC

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] who really is speedo man?

2001-03-01 Thread p



The Man Behind the SpeedoThere's a nearly naked runner in Maryland, and 
is he popular.Washington Posthttp://rd.mailshell.com/ad283br8o/washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3038-2001Feb28.html



Get Katchup in Your Inbox!http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Katchup 
Need a Daily Pep 
Talk? List Info: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dailypeptalk 
 Parents! Take a 
load off at the ParentCafeList Info: URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ParentCafe 
My Chat 
Addresses: ICQ: 103814927 Y! Messenger: Kazzmir MS Messenger: Kazzmir 
AOL Messenger: xmulvax


[CTRL] Florida Voters Strike Again

2001-03-01 Thread p



Incredibly, voters in Florida have struck yet 
again...

see
St. Petersburg Timeshttp://rd.mailshell.com/ad283br8o/www.sptimes.com/News/030101/TampaBay/Voters_punched_too_ma.shtml



Get Katchup in Your Inbox!http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Katchup 
Need a Daily Pep 
Talk? List Info: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dailypeptalk 
 Parents! Take a 
load off at the ParentCafeList Info: URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ParentCafe 
My Chat 
Addresses: ICQ: 103814927 Y! Messenger: Kazzmir MS Messenger: Kazzmir 
AOL Messenger: xmulvax


[CTRL] NR: Levin: The Eric Holder Story - An alternative history.

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nationalreview.com/contributors/levin030101.shtml

National Review
March 1, 2001

The Eric Holder Story - An alternative history.

By Mark R. Levin
Mr. Levin is president of the Landmark Legal Foundation

March 1, 2001

Today's Washington Post wonders whether "Eric Holder's future,
once assured, is marred by the case of Marc Printer-Friendly

Rich." When pressed on January 19, 2001 by ex-Clinton White House
Counsel Jack Quinn to support the Rich pardon, Deputy Attorney
General Holder was most accommodating. He told Quinn he was
"neutral, leaning towards favorable" on the Rich case. Holder's
remark was used by Quinn, and later Bill Clinton, to, in part,
justify the president's pardon of Rich. Holder now says that "If
I had focused on this in a way that I could have, should have,
the recommendation I would have given him would have been, 'Don't
do this Mr. President.'" Poor Eric Holder. He's just another
wonderful person who got caught up in the Clinton sleaze machine,
or at least that's what the Washington Post wants us to believe.

The fact is that during his three-year tenure as the second
highest-ranking official at the Justice Department, Holder was no
innocent bystander. He was one of the Clintons' most loyal,
partisan, and aggressive defenders.

In his outstanding new book, Absolute Power, David Limbaugh
provides a meticulously researched journey through the corruption
that was the Clinton-Reno Justice Department. Among other things,
he reminds us that just weeks before then-Independent Counsel
Kenneth Starr forwarded his impeachment referral to the House of
“He was one of the Clintons' most loyal, partisan, and aggressive
defenders.”

Representatives, it was Holder who pushed for a politically
motivated criminal investigation of Starr, philanthropist Richard
Mellon Scaife, and The American Spectator magazine. Of course,
the probe turned up no wrongdoing, but that wasn't its purpose.
The objective was to undermine Starr's credibility during this
key period with allegations of prosecutorial misconduct. Holder
also intended to besmirch Scaife's reputation and intimidate the
investigative reporters at The American Spectator.

Holder was also one of the top architects of the frivolous and
now discredited Secret Service protective function privilege
claim, which was asserted to undermine and delay Starr's
investigation. Limbaugh reports that Holder admitted to one of
Starr's deputies that Justice had no more than a 5 percent chance
of prevailing on this claim.

Holder's failure to object to Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich is
simply the latest in a long list of disgraceful actions he took
on behalf of Bill Clinton, to the detriment of the rule of law.
The unvarnished truth is that the only highlight of Holder's
tenure at the Justice Department was his departure.

=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Moon Landing A Hoax?

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Nadia A Hamer wrote:

 Aleisha,
 Perhaps you would care to explain what you meant when you wrote:-

 June perhaps you would want to give this Nadia Hammer (a bad penny) your
 rendition of what sodomy is like.

 That was such a lovely article you wrote I saved a copy.   You seem to
 be a specialist in the field of sodomy

 How do you two manage to share the same computer stool?

 Or tell her about Jesus being the bastard son of a woman who was
 "knocked up".

 You are both a big pile of dung aka la mared?


LOL!  lol!

Sorry, but THAT is a HISTORY!

I wonder what the marketing teams that monitor us on the net
(focus) will glean from that!


Good stuff!

It's GREAT how this list meets several of my needs, humor in this
case!

LOL!

=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] SLATE: Another Clinton Affair?

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

[As per many of my posts, I realize that a connection to
CONSPIRACY might seem esoteric, BUT there *IS* conspiracy on some
level in most of them.  As for the following article, wellit
seems to me that most conspiracy researcheres could smell THIS
"STANK" half way around the galaxy!]

http://politics.slate.msn.com/politics/default.asp

Thursday, March 1, 2001

By Jeremy Derfner

Another Clinton Affair?

Denise Rich "was having an affair with Clinton in the White
House," the National Enquirer reports. The issue that comes out
Friday will reveal what "Bill and Denise did in the secrecy of
the White House, what Hillary thought about the affair -- and why
Denise was so desperate to see her ex-husband pardoned."

See also:


http://www.nationalenquirer.com/allthebuzz/allthebuzz.cfm?instanceid=9959


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] NE: Clinton Rich Love Affair

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/




=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] NM: Court Won't Clear Tucker's Name

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

Court Won't Clear Tucker's Name

NewsMax.com

Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2001

Former Arkansas governor Jim Guy Tucker lost a court bid Tuesday
to set aside the fraud conviction for which he had already served
his time.

 According to an Associated Press report:

 A federal appeals court rejected Tucker's contention that a
juror was biased in the 1996 trial in which he was convicted
along with former President Bill Clinton's Whitewater business
partners James and Susan McDougal.

 Because Tucker completed serving the sentence of 18 months under
house arrest, his appeal was an attempt to get a court to clear
his name.

 Tucker charged that juror Renee Johnson was biased, due to her
marriage to Charles Hayes a week into the trial.

 As governor, Tucker had denied clemency for a 40-year drug
conviction to Hayes, whose uncle had distributed crude political
fliers ridiculing Tucker.

 The juror failed to list her new husband on a juror
questionnaire that asked about criminal cases involving family
members.

 The 8th United States Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis
ruled she had not necessarily been dishonest when she said she
did not consider Hayes a relative until they married, even though
she had lived with him and their child for years.


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] NR: A New Player

2001-03-01 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

A New Player

Investigators look into the role of Cheryl Mills.

National Review Online
March 1, 2001 6:05 p.m.
By Byron York


Former deputy White House counsel Cheryl Mills, who played a
prominent role in President Clinton's impeachment defense and now
serves as a trustee for the Clinton library foundation, took part
in an Oval Office discussion with the president about the Marc
Rich pardon the night Clinton made his last-minute decision to
grant clemency to Rich, according to testimony and documents made
public today by the House Government Reform Committee.

Mills left White House employment in the fall of 1999. Several
witnesses at today's hearing — former White House chief of staff
John Podesta, former White House counsel Beth Nolan, and former
top Clinton adviser Bruce Lindsey — testified that Mills was
often at the White House in the year and a half after she left to
become a senior vice president at Oxygen Media, a television and
internet firm devoted to women's programming.

"She continued to be a trusted adviser to the president," Nolan
told the committee. Nolan said that in the last weeks of the
administration, Mills was at the White House frequently for
end-of-term parties and other events. On the chaotic evening of
January 19, Clinton called several advisers to the Oval Office to
discuss his plans to pardon a number of people who had been
convicted or pled guilty in the Whitewater, Mike Espy, and Henry
Cisneros independent counsel investigations.

"I invited Ms. Mills to join that conversation," said Bruce
Lindsey, former close adviser to the president, citing Mills'
expertise on independent counsel issues. Lindsey testified that
at the meeting, Clinton raised the Rich pardon issue and that
Mills took part in that discussion, too. "I do not believe she
took a position on it," Lindsey said, referring to the Rich case.

But it appears that Mills' involvement was greater than simply
participating in one meeting. Republicans on the committee also
revealed that Roger Adams, the pardons attorney in the Justice
Department, has told the committee he called the White House to
discuss the Rich matter and ended up discussing it with Mills,
who spoke authoritatively on the matter. Adams was apparently
somewhat bewildered that a former White House employee would be
involved in pardon discussions.

In addition, the committee released a January 5, 2001 e-mail from
Robert Fink, a lawyer for Marc Rich in New York, to two other
members of the Rich team. "Here is the letter Jack [former White
House counsel Jack Quinn] just sent to the White House," Fink
wrote. "As you may notice his secretary said that Jack sent
copies to Beth Nolan, Bruce Lindsey and Cheryl Mills. April said
they have clearance to deliver it to the WH [White House], so it
will get there this evening, presumably before POTUS leaves for
Camp David." Quinn told the committee that he brought Mills into
the case in an effort to help convince Clinton to pardon Rich.

Earlier in the hearing, former Democratic National Committee
finance chair Beth Dozoretz appeared briefly before the
committee. Connecticut Republican Christopher Shays read to her
from a January 10, 2001 e-mail from an associate of Rich's to
Quinn. "DR [Rich's former wife Denise] called from Aspen," the
e-mail began. "Her friend B [Dozoretz] — who is with her — got a
call today from potus — who said he was impressed by JQ's
[Quinn's] last letter and that he wants to do it and is doing all
possible to turn around the WH counsels."

Shays asked Dozoretz why she discussed the Rich case with the
president. "Upon the advice of my counsel, I respectfully decline
to answer that question," Dozoretz said, citing her Fifth
Amendment right against self-incrimination. Shays asked whether
she would refuse to answer all questions on those grounds. She
said yes.

Georgia Republican Bob Barr asked Dozoretz whether she would at
least tell the committee whether she intends to cooperate with
the criminal investigation being conducted by federal prosecutors
in New York. She declined to answer that, too.

On another topic, the committee released information casting
doubt on one of Quinn's main arguments in favor of the Rich
pardon. On February 8, Quinn testified that he was frustrated at
the "intransigence" of federal prosecutors in New York who, Quinn
said, were unwilling to discuss the case with Rich. Quinn also
testified that the prosecutors' use of RICO, the racketeering
statute, was the "sledgehammer" that resulted in Rich's decision
not to return to the United States to face charges.

Now it appears that prosecutors were not as inflexible as Quinn
contended. In his opening statement, committee chairman Dan
Burton announced that in 1999 the government offered to drop the
RICO charges against Rich if he would return to the U.S. to face
trial. E-mails between members of the Rich team indicate that
prosecutors also agreed to set a bail for Rich in advance so he
would not have to worry 

[CTRL] FW: [CogLib] Shakespeare on Drugs

2001-03-01 Thread Nessie

-Caveat Lector-

-Original Message-
From:   Alchemind Society
Sent:   Thu 3/1/2001 2:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:[CogLib] Shakespeare on Drugs

Analysis of Shakespeare's Pipes Finds Residue
of cocaine, myristic acid, tobacco, and hints of marijuana.

Dr. Francis Thackeray, a paleontologist at the Transvaal Museum in
Pretoria has just published the findings of his analysis of residue
found in Shakespeare's pipes. The analysis revealed residue of cocaine,
myristic acid, tobacco, and hints of marijuana.

Read More:  http://www.alchemind.org/topclnews.htm

You received this message because you joined the Alchemind Society's
Center for Cognitive Liberty  Ethics e-mail alerts and announcements
list.

To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Alchemind Society: The International Association for Cognitive Liberty
www.alchemind.org
Center for Cognitive Liberty  Ethics
www.alchemind.org/CCLE/about.htm

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fw: FYROM: Deja Vu

2001-03-01 Thread Mrs. Jela Jovanovic

-Caveat Lector-

 http://www.centraleurope.com/news.php3?id=300131


 Macedonia Condemns Ethnic-Albanian Fighters

 SKOPJE, Mar 1, 2001 -- (Reuters) Macedonia said on
 Wednesday it hoped international diplomatic efforts
 would stop violence on its border it said was being
 provoked by ethnic Albanian fighters.

 But it said it would retaliate if forced to do so.

 "If the international community does not join
 Macedonia in overcoming violence, a division of the
 Balkans on religious grounds will be provoked due to
 Macedonia's geo-strategic position, which will
 seriously affect Europe," Defense Minister Ljuben
 Paunovski told Reuters in an interview.

 He was echoing international concerns of a looming new
 Balkan crisis, given that ethnic Albanians comprise a
 third of Macedonia's two million population and have
 had sometimes tense relations with the majority Slavs.

 A two-hour gunbattle between Macedonian security
 forces and what Skopje describes as ethnic Albanian
 "terrorists" at the Macedonian village of Tanusevci on
 the border with Kosovo two days ago prompted President
 Boris Trajkovski to seek support from the United
 Nations and NATO for a crackdown.

 "The armed group is using the village as a base and
 our security forces can take them out very quickly.
 But first we have to use all political and diplomatic
 means to solve the situation," Paunovski said as
 reports of new shootings came in.

 A NATO delegation arrived in Macedonia on Wednesday
 and went straight into crisis talks with Macedonian
 officials.

 NO PLAN TO ENTER KOSOVO

 Paunovski said Macedonia's plan of action did not
 include crossing the border into Kosovo.

 "If there is action, we will go only to the border, we
 must stop there. But any action will be coordinated
 with KFOR (NATO-led peace force in Kosovo)," Paunovski
 said.

 He said Macedonian forces had shown extreme restraint
 an effort to prevent an outbreak of a local
 inter-ethnic conflict.

 "If they have occupied a village in Macedonia, it's
 obvious that their political goals are to take that
 territory. We can not exclude the possibility that
 they might find support in some circles in Macedonia,"
 he said

 Paunovski said the armed group of ethnic-Albanians had
 support from the other side of the border and were
 connected with other armed groups in Kosovo, some of
 which he said were involved in contraband and crime.

 Skopje signed a long-delayed border demarcation
 agreement with Belgrade last week, which officials
 said would curb a flourishing smuggling businesses in
 the area in the long term.

 Paunovski welcomed statements from ethnic Albanian
 political parties in Macedonia and Kosovo expressing
 support for a diplomatic solution to the crisis.

 He strongly rejected reports of harassment of
 villagers by Macedonian forces and accused the ethnic
 Albanian fighters of driving the villagers away to
 escalate violence.

 Macedonian Prime Minister Ljubco Georgievski said
 earlier he had received unconfirmed reports that
 Albanian guerrillas were holding residents of
 Tanusevci as hostages to prevent the Macedonian forces
 from taking control of the village.

 Paunovski said the reports were hard to corroborate
 since the army and police had not set foot in the
 village for a week.

 "We cannot go there to check, because any attempt to
 check the village for civilians will mean armed
 conflict with the terrorists. That is the biggest
 dilemma," he said.



A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] This Years' Corn Seed Tainted By Unapproved GM StarLink!

2001-03-01 Thread Steve Wingate

-Caveat Lector-

This Years' Corn Seed Tainted
By Unapproved GM StarLink!
   3-1-1


   WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Corn seed about to be sold
   to farmers for this year's crop was found to be
   contaminated by traces of a genetically modified variety
   of the grain that prompted massive recalls last year, the
   Washington Post reported on Thursday.

   Quoting government and industry sources, the Post said
   seed companies detected the contamination while testing
   their stocks to make sure the seed was free of the
   engineered corn, known as StarLink, approved in the
   U.S. only for animal feed.

   StarLink is not approved for human consumption
   because of concerns about potential allergic reactions. It
   was found in taco shells in September, leading to an
   eventual recall of more than 300 food products.

   The Post said the newly discovered contamination does
   not pose any immediate public health threat because
   none of the seed has been planted.

   But if the contamination is found to be widespread,
   farmers and grain exporters fear it could be devastating
   because major buyers of American corn in Europe and
   Asia have said they will refuse to buy any corn suspected
   of being tainted by StarLink, the Post said.

   Representatives of the seed industry and other corn and
   food industry officials were scheduled to meet Thursday
   with officials from the three federal agencies that oversee
   agricultural biotechnology, the Post reported.

   ``There may be low levels of the StarLink protein in some
   non-StarLink hybrid corn seed,'' an Agriculture
   Department official told the Post. Those attending
   Thursday's meeting will ''look into the issue and further
   evaluate what steps may be necessary to address it,'' the
   newspaper said.

   Industry sources told the Post that it was unclear how the
   seed corn came to contain the StarLink protein, called
   Cry9c. The sources were also quoted as saying the level
   of Cry9c being found in corn seed is very low.

   StarLink's developer, Aventis CropScience, a unit of
   Franco-German life science firm Aventis SA, maintains
   the corn is safe for human consumption. The
   pharmaceutical giant has asked the U.S. Environmental
   Protection Agency to approve StarLink retroactively for
   human use to avert future disruptions of the corn supply,
   but the agency is under intense pressure from critics of
   biotechnology to keep the ban on human use, the Post
   said.






MainPage
 http://www.rense.com

ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL 

[CTRL] [radtimes] # 170

2001-03-01 Thread radman

-Caveat Lector-

[radtimes] # 170

An informally produced compendium of vital irregularities.

"We're living in rad times!"
---
Send $$ to RadTimes!!  --  (See ** at end.)
---
Contents:

--CSIS Report On Organized Crime
--Computer criminals weave Web of deceit
--US crews involved in Colombian battle
--Feds vs. Bongs: Heads Up for Head Shops
--How To Confront Globalization: Take It To The Streets
--Tissue consent an issue
--Robert Anton Wilson Speculates On Government
--Drug Abuse, Trafficking Up Worldwide

===

CSIS Report On Organized Crime

CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE SERVICE CANADA ANNUAL REPORT ON ORGANIZED CRIME
IN CANADA 2000 - http://www.cisc.gc.ca/Cisc2000/annualreport2000.html
English and French.
Visit this site for information on:
- Asian-based Organized Crime
- East European-based Organized Crime
- Traditional Organized Crime
- Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs
- Sexual Exploitation of Children
- Other Monitored and Emerging Issues
- Contraband Smuggling (includes information from Aboriginal-based
Organized Crime, the Illegal Movement of Firearms and Organized Crime
in Marine Ports projects)
- Illegal Gaming
- Technology and Crime

===

Computer criminals weave Web of deceit

Cyber criminals are targeting companies, with lucrative results.

by Simon Goodley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE DAILY TELEGRAPH (LONDON)
February 22, 2001

   Internet and technology companies often claim that the risk of high-tech
crime is exaggerated, but the threat is real enough.

 The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), for example, said its
   technology-based case load has nearly tripled over the past three years. In
   October 1997, it had around 453 pending investigations into such areas as
   computer intrusions and viruses. It now has more than 1,200 such cases,
which do not even include other internet-related crimes, including fraud or
child
   pornography.

 The spectre of digital crime has also got the UK government worried
enough to dedicate pounds 25m over three years to establish a new National
Hi-Tech
Crime Unit, which will be launched in April. The unit, which is currently
looking for a chief superintendent to head a team of 40 dedicated
"cybercops", will
   investigate internet crime, including the highest profile offences:
credit card fraud, paedophile rackets and hacking.

 Credit card fraud receives almost as much media scrutiny as the seedy
world
   of internet pornography. According to the Association of Payment Clearing
   Services (APACS), "card not present fraud"- which includes internet
purchases as well and phone and mail order - amounted to pounds 47.2m in
the first 11
months of last year, an increase of 80pc on the previous year. It is
estimated that
   15pc of "card not present fraud" is conducted over the Net.

 Hacking, the term widely used for illegally breaking into a computer
system, also appears to be growing sharply. Last year, the US computer giant
Microsoft called in the FBI to investigate a hacker who had penetrated its
computer
   systems and accessed top secret information on its software. JANET-CERT, a
   report into malicious attacks on computer systems in academic
institutions, said
   there were 944 reported attacks last month, compared with 206 in January
2000.

 If academic institutions don't seem like an obvious target for high-tech
   criminals, financial institutions do. Predictably, there have been only
a few
   reported cases of criminals hacking into banks' computers as the banks
only like to talk about security to explain how safe their systems are.

 But the secure image that the financial industry likes to cultivate is not
   the full picture. In 1994, hackers penetrated Citibank's computers and
extracted around $10m ( pounds 6.7m).

 The bank claimed that the size of the withdrawal was because it allowed a
   series of hacks to co-operate with law enforcement authorities. Citibank,
   however, still admits to losing $400,000.

 Michael Vatis, director of the FBI's National Infrastructure Protection
   Centre, says: "Banks often have relatively good security, but even they
are not immune from attack. We have seen intrusions into banks in the US
and abroad
   which are still under investigation."

 Other banks have proved to be as impregnable as a wendy house, even to the
   point that criminals can literally walk in off the street and remove their
   computer systems.

 Since last autumn, police have been chasing a gang of thieves who hit a
   number of top City investment banks, including one bank that was targeted
more than once, as well as other businesses around the UK and mainland
Europe. In
   total, they 

[CTRL] American Oligarchs

2001-03-01 Thread Taercel

-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.newsmax.com/commentarchive.shtml?a=2001/3/1/020455

}}Begin
NewsMax.com


The American Oligarchy, Tax Cuts and the Taxaholics in Congress
Diane Alden
March 1, 2001
Analyst Doug Bandow of the Cato Institute states, "Income tax cuts are a moral
imperative. Americans bear the highest peacetime tax burden in history. In the face
of a possible economic slowdown, Uncle Sam continues to grossly overcharge
taxpayers."
If that is the case, then why does Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., say
"the rich would be able to buy a Lexus, while the poor could purchase only a muffler
for a used car" if a Bush tax cut passes?
It really seems that the super-rich like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett and certain
members of Congress believe anyone making over 75 grand a year should be paying
taxes out the nose. If they have an estate worth more than $650,000, that should be
taken from them at a better than 80 percent rate of confiscation.
The ghoulish death tax is one of the most unfair taxes of all. The income of the
semi-rich or even the barely rich has already been taxed several times over. The
death tax is the finger in the eye of those who have worked hard, invested, and want
to pass on a little of their hard work to their heirs or to keep the companies they
have built afloat.
What is behind the rhetoric of Tom Daschle, the super-rich, the foundations and the
leftist media? Do they really believe that Bush's tax cut and abolishing the death
tax would somehow be unfair to the "poor" or working middle class? Or does it go
deeper than that? Is the tax debate really, in fact, a power struggle which in the
end will only benefit the continued growth of government and the financial health
and interests of a relatively few super-rich foundations and individuals.
It should be obvious to Americans that there is more to wealth creation than a
healthy stock portfolio. The creation of capital goods and investment in land or
real property or the creation of real property is also wealth creation. The 401K
does not just depend on someone signing up with Ameritrade, it also depends on
people making real stuff to sell to other real people. Paper wealth is not worth the
paper it is printed on if there is no real wealth in kind behind it.
Coca-Cola stock is not what the 'real' wealth is. Rather, it is the product, the
plant and those who create and build it that is more important to economic good
health than a stock market over 10,000. You can manipulate or create more
greenbacks, gold, stock, or other forms of wealth. However, it is pretty hard to
manipulate the long-term buying and selling of real goods in a free market. Supply
and demand still work, although politicians and government want to central-plan it
to death and turn those concepts on their head.
When Nixon put in place price controls in the '70s it did nothing but skew the economy 
and put off the inevitable while it made a few people "feel" good. Californians are 
finding out what happens when you manipulate energ
y markets, where real deregulation never took place and now ordinary people are paying 
the cost of environmental or corporate policy which messed with the free market and 
destroyed commonsense environmentalism by regulati
ng it and litigating it to death.
In the real world of the here and now, the up-and-coming Coca-Colas, the new 
businessmen and businesswomen, the small entrepreneur is being taxed and regulated to 
death. With central planning emanating from D.C., the pote
ntial millionaire or billionaire finds his own tax money used against him, tax money 
he might otherwise be reinvesting. The small businessmen are boxed in by a tax and 
regulatory system that is funded by the taxpayer. It
is a system heralded as economic "justice" by professional politicians, the super-rich 
and their foundations. But there is no justice in that notion.
Ensconced in their tax-free foundations, members of the super-rich oligarchy have no 
problem saying that "fairness" is taking to the cleaners the top 1 percent of 
taxpayers, who are paying about one-third of all income ta
xes. Nor does it bother them that the top 5 percent pay more than half and the top 10 
percent pay nearly two-thirds. The top 25 percent pay more than $4 of every $5 that 
goes to the taxman – but who cares. The oligarchs a
re so rich and have so much influence and hide their money so well, they can afford to 
beat up on the merely semi-wealthy.
Add that to the power that Alan Greenspan has wielded over the economy in recent years 
and this continuation of top-down economic feudalism continues apace. It becomes more 
apparent that too much power is in too few hands
. It is not in the hands of the small- to medium-sized businessman or even subject to 
the cleansing effects of the free market. But it is a function, as often as not, of 
monolithic government and multinational corporatism
, which we could call fascism OR federal feudalism.
The free market or individual 

[CTRL] Fwd: [GATA] An open letter faxed today to the World Gold Council's CEO

2001-03-01 Thread Kris Millegan





March 1, 2001

To:  Ms. Haruko Fukuda
 Chief Executive Officer
 World Gold Council
 45 Pall Mall
 London SW1Y 5JG
 United Kingdom

Dear Ms. Fukuda:

Last Friday there was an article in The Wall Street
Journal by Neil Behrmann titled, "World Gold Council
Hopes to End Gold Price's 20-Year Bear Market."

The article mentions Reginald Howe's complaint filed
in U.S. District Court in Boston and the Gold Anti-Trust
Action Committee, stating, "The complaint 'for damages
and injunctive relief' alleges manipulative activities
in the gold market by central banks and bullion banks
to depress the gold price from 1994 to the present."

It goes on to say the World Gold Council is distancing
themselves from the allegations:

"'We've thoroughly researched the allegations and don't
find any evidence of manipulation in both the gold and
gold derivatives markets,' said Ms. Leyland and Mr.
Cruikshanks of the council."

On behalf of GATA, I recently toured South Africa,
visiting Johannesburg, Cape Town, Durban, and Pretoria.
I met with the president of the National Union of
Mineworkers; the South African minister of minerals and
energy and her staff; the king of the Zulus, Goodwin
Zwelithini; the South African Chamber of Commerce;
business leaders; 11 senior gold analysts; political
officials; gold producer executives; and officials of
the Reserve Bank of South Africa.

All were impressed by the evidence GATA presented
about manipulation of the gold price. All seemed curious
to know more, because, if GATA's allegations are verified,
the gold price will soar and the economy of South
Africa will benefit from the return to work of more than
100,000 miners. In turn, money will be freed to combat the
terrible crime and epidemic disease afflicting South Africa.

GATA and its supporters have worked hard for more than
two years to expose the truth about the gold market. That
is what will come out when Howe is allowed to ask questions
under oath of the defendants in our lawsuit during the
pre-trial discovery process.

Support that the Howe/GATA complaint should be heard
is growing around the world. Unfortunately, disturbing
comments from the World Gold Council, such as the one
above, retard the truth-seeking process.

Since you have done so much research about our claims
and can find no evidence for them, would you please
publish your findings, in fairness to the many who are
harmed by your comments? While there are those in the
gold world who do not agree with us, they never
specify what they dispute in the massive body of
evidence we have documented.

If The Wall Street Journal article was in error about
the World Gold Council's position on GATA, we and the
council deserve a correction. After all, it is in the
interest of your members' shareholders that GATA has
toiled these past two years.

Thank you for your consideration.

All the best,

BILL MURPHY, Chairman
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
Dallas, Texas

-END-





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/