Re: [CTRL] ~McVeigh's Confession~ Whatever is covered up will be uncovered (fwd)
-Caveat Lector- --- Yardbird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: McVeigh's "Confession" From: Jon Roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] McVeigh's "Confession" First, we don't really know who the person is who is in custody. We may call him "Timothy McVeigh", but it could be a surrogate. No matter who it is, it is not necessarily the person who set of the truck bomb. _ Nakano comments: This is right on Jon. Even more, we don't know for sure who was stopped for speeding and then arrested in Noble County Oklahoma about 90 minutes after the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building. It seems that person was trying to attract attention to himself and get taken into custody. The person we were told was McVeigh was speeding with the rear license place dangling down.(according to news reports) When the officer pulled him over, he told the officer he was carrying a concealed pistol and so he was arrested. "McVeigh" was then held in the Noble County Jail for 3 days, during which time no one at the jail suspected he was involved in the bombing. They were within 30 minutes of release "McVeigh", when they got a phone call from the FBI saying: "We think you have the guy we are looking for...hold him!" Interesting huh? Then the FBI people came to the jail and took "McVeigh". But that's not all they took. They took the fingerprint records, "mugshot" photos, the negatives, the blanket, sheets, pillow, and mattress from the jailcell where he had been held. The Noble County Sheriff later complained in an interview that the FBI had never returned any of these things. In other words, they took every bit of evidence of who it was that had been in that jail cell. We know for a fact there was a BATF Agent who looked almost like a twin brother of Tim McVeigh. The BATF has never responded to questions as to the whereabouts of this agent during this period. Was it the McVeigh "double" in that jail? Jon Roland continues: "The only way any "confession" can be credible is if it reveals new information that only the guilty person could know. If one reads what has been released about what he is alleged to have said, there is no such revelation. Indeed, it all seems contrived to support the government theory of the case, including the degree and nature of the complicity of Terry Nichols. __ Nakano comments: Since "McVeigh" was first brought into the public's awareness as the bomber, there has been a suspicious lack of information from him. There have been a few very limited "jailhouse interviews" conducted under close supervision and with no questions permitted about the Oklahoma bombing. McVeigh did not testify at his trial. After beinf found guiltly, he read a short curious statement which did not mention the bombing or his any reference to being guilty or innocent. Since the trial he has been kept in deep confinement and out of the public's attention. In this time when "everybody is famous for 15 minutes", we have books written by or about the winners of TV game shows, the mistresses of politicians, tattletale books on just about every person who has gained any fame or notice for any reason. Question: Where are the books about Tim McVeigh? Where are the newspaper articles by reporters who have done in-depth interviews? And now we are told, "McVeigh" has waived all appeals so he will be quickly executed. We are told, there will be no autopsy and so, conveniently, there will be no medical historical record of who this person really isor was. The most disturbing thing about all of this is the manner in which the gullible public is willing to simply accept all the official explanations without question. Could it be that most people are afraid to learn that their government isn't telling them the "whole truth, and nothing but the truth"? Nakano _ So what can we be certain of in this case? We can be certain that the truck bomb could not have caused the damage to the building that occurred. It would be physically impossible for that to occur. It would violate the laws of physics. There were charges detonated inside the building that caused most of the damage and loss of life." __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to
[CTRL] ~McVeigh's Confession~ Whatever is covered up will be uncovered (fwd)
-Caveat Lector- "Whatever is covered up will be uncovered and every secret will be made known." Luke 12:2 Original Message Subject: McVeigh's "Confession" Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:43:30 -0800 From: Jon Roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] McVeigh's "Confession" Associates can confirm that I have been predicting for a long time that there would be a "confession" by Timothy McVeigh contrived by the Establishment to counter the widespread suspicions of government complicity in the Oklahoma City bombing of April 19, 1995. I predicted that it would come out in a book, allegedly based on interviews by "independent" journalists. It would be accompanied by a full-court PR campaign involving all the major media. Now that my prediction has been fulfilled, it is time to comment on this event. Most people will, of course, simply believe the reports. After all, they will say, it is McVeigh speaking. Why would he not be telling the truth when he confesses that he did it? The answer requires some background knowledge of how such a confession can be contrived to be convincing. First, we don't really know who the person is who is in custody. We may call him "Timothy McVeigh", but it could be a surrogate. No matter who it is, it is not necessarily the person who set of the truck bomb. It is not difficult to induce a person to make such a confession and make it convincing. He could be a government agent who expects the injection not to be lethal, or who is sacrificing himself for the sake of someone else. He could have been brainwashed into saying what he is alleged to be saying. Or the interviews might be total fabrications. There are ways to do that in a way that would fool the interviewers, even if they are not complicit in the hoax. The only way any "confession" can be credible is if it reveals new information that only the guilty person could know. If one reads what has been released about what he is alleged to have said, there is no such revelation. Indeed, it all seems contrived to support the government theory of the case, including the degree and nature of the complicity of Terry Nichols. So what can we be certain of in this case? We can be certain that the truck bomb could not have caused the damage to the building that occurred. It would be physically impossible for that to occur. It would violate the laws of physics. There were charges detonated inside the building that caused most of the damage and loss of life. That does not mean that someone, "McVeigh", might not have built and detonated a truck bomb in the way it is alleged to have occurred. That person might actually believe that his bomb caused all the damage. The way that government agents who wanted a Reichstag event might do it would be to find someone like "McVeigh", induce him to commit a bombing, or merely observe him, and, realizing that his truck bomb would not cause enough damage, plant charges inside the building, then set them off from a helicopter or other observation point right after the truck bomb went off, to make it appear the truck bomb did all the damage. They could then blame him for everything. One might ask, why would government agents do such a thing? Wouldn't a truck bomb that blew out some windows and hurt a lot of people from flying glass be sufficient for their purposes? No. Not in this case. The suspect faction within the government needed a large loss of life to accomplish their political agenda. They didn't want any public sympathy for the bomber, so they needed many deaths of sympathetic persons, especially children. Taking advantage of a terrorist attack by amplifying its effect, in a way that would still allow all the damage to be blamed on the independent terrorist, would be a nearly ideal plan. The independent bomber would thus neatly play into their hands. Like the JFK assassination, this case will never go away, especially after "McVeigh" is dead and no longer available to correct his "confession". This alleged "confession" will never be accepted by more knowledgeable persons as dispositive. All the "confessions" won't make the impossible physics of a single truck bomb go away. Only revelations of complicity by government personnel and prosecutions of those agents might do that, and we should not be surprised if that eventually happens, and happens in a way that avoids blame to higher officials who actually authorized the incident. If the controversy lingers, it may become expedient to throw a few "rogues" to the wolves, in this and in the Waco and other incidents. There is a long history of sacrificing agents when the plans of their seniors don't succeed, in ways that preserve deniability. === Constitution Society, 1731 Howe Av #370, Sacramento, CA 95825 916/568-1022, 916/450-7941VM Date: 03/29/01 Time: 18:34:50 http://www.constitution.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
