WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War! China weighs battle with U.S. The red missiles came in low over the calm waters between China and Taiwan, slicing through the cold November air at a frantic pace, turning each nose-cone a cherry red. Taiwanese radar operators frantically scrambled to warn their nation of the incoming danger, but they were snuffed out by the onslaught. Offshore, a U.S. Aegis cruiser helplessly watched on its radar as dozens of warheads streaked across the night sky, into the tiny island nation. The first missiles from Chinese 2nd Artillery mobile units were aimed at critical targets inside Taiwan, landing with a combination of deadly accurate conventional bombs and nerve gas. This first shower lasted for only one minute -- 60 seconds of death from the sky. The rain of Dong Feng, or "East Wind," missiles poured into the island, spilling deadly nerve gas, cutting power and communications with a shower of cluster bombs. The sudden attack also instantly grounded most of the Taiwanese Air Force while killing thousands of civilians in a silent cloud of death that drifted throughout the night. The second rain consisted of only one drop, a single Dong Feng missile. The single bomb fell from the night sky into downtown Taipei unmolested, and detonated its small nuclear warhead only a few feet from its intended target. In a single blinding flash, most of the city died in a shower of deadly neutrons. What few who were left alive near ground zero were then consumed by the inferno of the nuclear blast and fire. The entire shower from the east lasts for only two minutes. However, during those two minutes over five hundred thousand Taiwanese died and Taipei disappeared under a shroud of radioactive death. The tiny island, critically wounded and diplomatically isolated, falls in three days to Beijing's occupation force of one million soldiers. Could this happen? Will China go to war over Taiwan? The U.S. defense and political establishment may continue to debate the question of war -- but the People's Liberation Army Central Military Command has already issued orders. "Taking into account of possible intervention by the U.S. and based on the development strategy of our country, it is better to fight now than (in the) future -- the earlier, the better," states official document number 199965 from the Chinese Central Military Command. "We will gain control of Taiwan before full deployment of the U.S. troops," states the Chinese army report. "In this case, the only thing the U.S. can do is fight a war with the purpose of retaliation, which will be similar to the Gulf War against Iraq or the recent bombing of Yugoslavia as far as its operational objective is concerned, namely to first attack from the sky and the sea our coastal military targets, and then attack our vital civil facilities so as to force us to accept its terms like Iraq or Yugoslavia." Would China risk combat with U.S. forces over tiny Taiwan? The last direct, full-scale combat between U.S. and Chinese soldiers occurred a half century ago in the bloody stalemate called Korea. Warfare today is high-tech and the U.S. has the advantage, right? "When both sides rely mainly on missile strikes based on electronic confrontation, we evidently enjoy a superiority in terms of the number of short-range and middle-range missiles," answers the Chinese military report. "It can safely be expected that once the U.S. launches an attack, the front lines of the U.S. forces and their supporting bases will be exposed within the range of our effective strikes. After the first strategic strike, the U.S. forces will be faced with weaponry and logistic problems, providing us with opportunities for major offensives and win large battles." "Our principle is 'willing to sustain major losses of our armed forces to defend even just one square inch of land,'" states the Chinese army report. "If the U.S. forces lose thousands or hundreds of men under our powerful strikes, the anti-war sentiment within their country will force the U.S. government to take the same path as they did in Viet Nam." "Even if we successfully carry out interception and control the sky, our military and civil facilities will still incur some damages. The damages will be more extensive if the war cannot be ended within a short period of time and the U.S. launch the second and third strikes," the Chinese command report continues. Would China risk international isolation and war with U.S allies such as Japan and Europe? U.S. forces have deployed and fought with allies together in Iraq and Yugoslavia. Would they join the U.S. in a war against China? "Internationally, the many obstacles to the resolution of (the) Taiwan issue have been put in by the United States, while Japan has a complicated attitude towards our handling of (the) Taiwan issue, but because of historical and geographical reasons," answers the Chinese military report, "Japan does not have a right to comment. EU has ideas different from those in the U.S. and strategically focuses on Europe, so they do not have direct interests in (the) Taiwan issue. In recent years, the relationships between EU and our country have been developing smoothly, and therefore it is very unlikely that EU will fight a full-scale war with us simply because of the United States." What about nuclear weapons? Would China risk a nuclear war over Taiwan with a far better armed America? "So far we have built up the capability for the second and third nuclear strikes and fairly confident in fighting a nuclear war," answers the Chinese military report. "Unlike Iraq and Yugoslavia, China is not only a big country, but also possesses a nuclear arsenal that has long been incorporated into state warfare systems and played a real role in our national defense. The PCC has decided to pass through formal channels this message to the top leaders of the U.S." Is China really planning to go to war? "Based on the long-term interests and current strength of our country and our armed forces, the question that we have to consider is not Taiwan's capability to defend itself or what kind of war will be fought if the U.S. intervenes, but our tactics and timing," noted the Central Military Command. The quoted Central Military Command document was written in August 1999. In late September 1999, the Chinese military staged a series of exercises in the southeast coastal and inland regions. The exercises continued through the winter months and into the new century. The exercises, involving over one million Chinese soldiers, included the firing of Dong Feng 11 and Dong Feng 15 missiles. The chilling note is that the war games ended with the successful flight test of a new Dong Feng 31 ballistic missile. The Dong Feng 31 can hurl up to three nuclear bombs onto the West Coast of America. Would America risk losing Washington, Oregon and California over Taiwan? Charles Smith is a national security and defense reporter for WorldNetDaily. *COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ] Want to be on our lists? Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists! ****************************************************************************** ******************* A vote for Bush or Gore is a vote to continue Clinton policies! A vote for Buchanan is a vote to continue America! Therefore a vote for Gore or Bush is a wasted vote for America! Don't waste your vote! Vote for Patrick Buchanan! Today, candor compels us to admit that our vaunted two-party system is a snare and a delusion, a fraud upon the nation. Our two parties have become nothing but two wings of the same bird of prey... Patrick Buchanan <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
