_______   ____   ______
  /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //    M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
 / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\         Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\           http://www.MiddleEast.Org

  News, Information, & Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
         and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
                      *  *  *  *  *  *  *
          IF YOU DON'T GET MER, YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!
     To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




                REGIONAL WAR NOW POSSIBLE

MID-EAST REALITIES - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 12/03:
   It's a game of political brinkmanship at the moment, everyone using threats
in a desperate attempt to retain power for themselves and to gain position for
the intense political struggles ahead.
   But, it's not all just posturing.  The political situation, combined with
emotions generated by the Al-Aqsa Intifada, combined with the military situation,
are all creating a vortex that could spin madly out of control.  The Arabs might
think they have some chance of standing up to Israel in a way that could enhance
their overall geo-political situation -- maybe a short intense war that would
force international intervention, especially with the region's oil still vital.
 The Israelis are determined to show the Arabs that they have the power and cunning
to defeat them all and if need be to change once again the whole regional situation
as they have done before.  The Palestinians may feel they have little to loose;
so too Saddam Hussein.
   Everyone however may be very wrong in these calculations.  A regional war
with today's weaponry should be unthinkable...but is not.  Such a war could result
in a huge human death toll with tremendous damage never before inflicted on the
countries of the Middle East in prior wars.  If they consider themselves provoked,
and if they can twist public opinion their way, at least in the short run, the
Israelis could decide to unleash their tremendous military capability determined
to demonstrate to everyone how powerful they are, how much damage they can inflict.
 If they are acting so savagely toward Palestinians throwing stones and shooting
a few bullets, just imagine what they might decide to do if faced by a serious
enemy inflicting real damage.
   Furthurmore, should things not go well for them and Israeli cities should
be attacked in any significant way, the Israelis are very capable of using their
weapons of mass destruction against both Arab armies and cities.  The "Sampson
complex"* need not actually come into play, just a determination to make it crystal
clear any attempt to actually destroy Israeli might well trigger it.
   Should such a war begin to seriously develop, Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia
will desperately try to stay out. But public pressures would be considerable,
especially in this age of instant television and the Internet. Furthermore, Israeli
apprehensions and fears about what might happen if they don't strike at some
armies first might bring about miscalculations and preemptions that could result
in a truly devastating regional conflict.

* The Sampson Complex is the title of a book -- of course taken from the Biblical
Sampson story -- written a decade ago by Pulitzer Prize-winning Journalist Seymour
Hirsh, detailing Israel's nuclear weapons capabilities as well as Israel's peculiar
post-Holocaust psychology that could in fact lead the Israelis to destroy the
whole region if their own existence as a Jewish State were truly threatened.



         IRAQ SEEN ENTERING WAR IF ISRAEL COUNTERS HIZBULLAH ATTACKS
                   By Steve Rodan, Middle East Newsline

 JERUSALEM — MiddleEast Newsline - 1 Dec:   For the first time in a decade,
 Israel has raised the prospect of a  regional war with the Arab world with the
 key participation of Iraq.

 Israeli sources said the most likely prospect is a Hizbullah attack on the northern
 Israeli border. Israel would then react by retaliating against Syrian military
 installations in Lebanon. This, in turn, would result in Iraqi and Iranian 
intervention.

 Such a prospect could take place imminently or be delayed for months, the sources
 said. They said this was the strongest threat of a regional war in more than
a decade.

 The sources said Israel and the United States have relayed messages to Syria
to
 stop Hizbullah attacks along the border. Syria has up to 30,000 troops in Lebanon
 and controls the Hizbullah.

 Syria, however, has so far rejected the warnings. Instead, President Bashar
Assad
 has formed new links with Iraq that include military cooperation. The sources
said
 the cooperation could include Iraqi intervention in case of Israeli attacks
on Syria.

 A senior Israeli military source said Iraq is ready to launch missile attacks
on the
 Jewish state to either help Syria or the Palestinians. These missiles, they
said, could
 be tipped with nonconventional warheads.

 "The Iraqis would love to participate in either conflict," the senior source
said.
 "Hafez Assad [Syria's late president] was not interested in cooperating with
Iraq.
 Bashar is interested and wants to cooperate."

 An Israeli war with Syria, Lebanon and Iraq could drag such U.S. Arab allies
as
 Egypt and Jordan, the source said.



          ISRAEL THREATENS SYRIANS WITH AIR BOMBARDMENT

            Armed forces warn that further Hizbollah
            attacks on Israeli soldiers or civilians will
            lead to retaliation against troops in Lebanon.

                    By Phil Reeves in Jerusalem

 [The Independent - 2 December 2000]
 Israel is threatening Syria with air strikes against its military bases in
 south Lebanon if there are further border attacks on Israeli soldiers or
 civilians by Hizbollah guerrillas.

 Such warnings were common during Israel's occupation of south
 Lebanon but they have resumed following fresh Hizbollah assaults.
 They raise anew the alarming spectre of a wider Middle East conflict.

 The threat against Syria's 20,000 troops in Lebanon was outlined
 yesterday by a senior Israeli security source. He said Syria possessed
 the power to rein in Hizbollah, but instead Bashar al-Assad, its
 president, encouraged it. The Syrians did not understand the
 consequences of their "dangerous policies", said the source.

 Iranian-sponsored Hizbollah recently renewed attacks on Israel,
 capturing four soldiers in the last two months and killing one with a
 roadside bomb. It is acting on the pretext that Israel is still occupying
 the Shebaa Farms, a small pocket of what it claims was originally
 Lebanese land that was seized by Syria in the 1940s and – in 1967 –
 occupied by Israel as part of the Golan Heights. The United Nations
 has ruled it to be on the Israeli side of the "blue line" that marks out
 the Israeli-occupied Golan from Lebanon.

 Israel's annoyance with Syria's new young president has been
 heightened by disappointment that he has not proved any more likely
 to succumb to Israeli demands than his father, Hafez al-Assad, who
 died in June. The bizarre, but widely circulated notion that "Dr
 Bashar's" British training as an ophthalmologist and his interest in
 computers would soften his stance on Syrian interests – making him,
 in western eyes, a relative "moderate" – has predictably proved to be
 no more than diplomatic guff.

 The Israeli military is alarmed by Bashar al-Assad's eagerness to forge
 closer relations with Iraq in contrast to his father, whose hostility
 towards Saddam Hussein reached a peak in 1991 when he supported
 Operation Desert Storm. Last month Izzat Ibrahim, a member of the
 Revolutionary Command Council, was the most senior Iraqi official
 for two decades to visit Damascus. Reports abound that Iraq is piping
 oil to Syria in defiance of sanctions.

 Bashar al-Assad "was expected to be more moderate due to his
 western education," said the Israeli security source, who requested
 anonymity. "But he is behaving just the opposite way. He is very
 extreme. He has turned very hard in the direction of the Iraqis." If
 Israel gets embroiled in a conflict with Damascus, the source warned,
 then Iraq would be "delighted" to join in.

 This week, Israel bombarded a Lebanese town after a Hizbollah bomb
 killed one of its soldiers. But Ehud Barak, the Israeli prime minister,
 has held back from retaliation over the captured men – three soldiers
 and a reserve colonel – because he did not want to open another front
 while battling the Palestinian intifada.

 Israeli troops shot dead two more Palestinians yesterday – one, a
 12-year-old boy – after unrest erupted following the first Friday
 prayers of Ramadan.

 Although the Israel Defense Forces principally blame the Syrian
 president for their embarrassing setbacks at the hands of Hizbollah, it
 is also pointing a finger at the United Nations Interim Force in
 Lebanon. It claims that the guerrillas who seized the three soldiers
 were disguised as UN peacekeepers, using equipment acquired from an
 Indian battalion. A UN spokesman has called the report incorrect. The
 story does, however, smack of a larger Israeli publicity campaign – an
 effort to undermine Palestinian efforts to persuade the United Nations
 to send an observer force to the occupied territories.








        MiD-EasT RealitieS  -  www.MiddleEast.Org
        Phone:  202 362-5266    Fax:  815 366-0800
                           Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscriibe email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject SUBSCRIBE
To unsubscribe email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject UNSUBSCRIBE



Reply via email to