Re: [CTRL] LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

2002-02-09 Thread Nurev Ind



William Shannon wrote:
In a message
dated 2/7/02 9:04:05 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


It's
so beautiful that you feel compelled and comfortable enough with your listmates
to share the
depth and breadth of all your wonderful emotions. We all, and especially
I, just can't tell you enough, how your feelings are so
meaningful,
profound, and thought provoking.

Well well,
look who's talking.
Isn't this
the fellow who is king of the snippy and profane retort? The guy who calls
"listmates" Nazis, assholes, and whatever else comes to his mind?
The one
who piles on Saba, a woman, and calls her nasty names?
Yeah, I
thought that was you.
Bill.


Saba is a WOMAN?





Re: [CTRL] LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

2002-02-09 Thread Saba

-Caveat Lector-

Yes, Saba is a woman and I once saw a picture of Bill Shannon and his
beautiful blonde wife - he is very handsome and she is very elegant.

Now Joshua2 I can imagine - little chub cheeked fatso sitting on his
little behind on a comuter monitoring the militias..you should be so
handsome as Bill Shannon.

OSaba

And Irish too.

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

2002-02-09 Thread William Shannon
In a message dated 2/9/02 1:30:47 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Now Joshua2 I can imagine - little chub cheeked fatso sitting on his
little behind on a comuter monitoring the militias..you should be so
handsome as Bill Shannon.

Why thank you Saba! You remember!
I still need to send you that book we discussed...if you want to make arrangements we can do that offline.

And I believe your correct about Joshua...short, fat, single..with a prominent facial feature.

Bill.


Re: [CTRL] LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

2002-02-09 Thread Nurev Ind

-Caveat Lector-

Saba wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 Yes, Saba is a woman and I once saw a picture of Bill Shannon and his
 beautiful blonde wife - he is very handsome and she is very elegant.

 Now Joshua2 I can imagine - little chub cheeked fatso sitting on his
 little behind on a comuter monitoring the militias..you should be so
 handsome as Bill Shannon.

 OSaba

 And Irish too.

And how do you know that genius? Did you ever see me?
Did you ever see a picture of me?
Do you even know anyone who knows me?
Or do you come these conclusions the same way you do about everything else
you bable about?

J2

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

2002-02-08 Thread William Shannon
In a message dated 2/7/02 9:04:05 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


It's so beautiful that you feel compelled and comfortable enough with your listmates
to share the depth and breadth of all your wonderful emotions. We all, and especially I, just can't tell you enough, how your feelings are so
meaningful, profound, and thought provoking.


Well well, look who's talking.

Isn't this the fellow who is king of the snippy and profane retort? The guy who calls "listmates" Nazis, assholes, and whatever else comes to his mind?

The one who piles on Saba, a woman, and calls her nasty names?

Yeah, I thought that was you.

Bill.




Re: [CTRL] LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

2002-02-07 Thread William Shannon
In a message dated 2/7/02 1:23:25 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES 

I hate country "music" but always liked that song...the Johnny Lee version...oh, and Ann Coulter is a psycho-twit.

Bill.


Re: [CTRL] LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

2002-02-07 Thread Nurev Ind



William Shannon wrote:
In a message
dated 2/7/02 1:23:25 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


LOOKIN'
FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

I hate
country "music" but always liked that song...the Johnny Lee version...oh,
and Ann Coulter is a psycho-twit.
Bill.

It's so beautiful that you feel compelled and comfortable enough
with your listmates
to share the depth and breadth of all your wonderful emotions.
We all, and especially I, just can't tell you enough, how your feelings
are so
meaningful, profound, and thought provoking.
Oh yes. The Johnny Lee version of Looking for Love really sucks. The
best version
was done by Buckwheat.
Joshua2







[CTRL] LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

2002-02-06 Thread Peat



LOOKIN' FOR LOVE IN ALL THE WRONG 
PLACES 
Fri Feb 1, 7:01 
PM ET 
By Ann Coulter 
Breaking with other Cabinet officials this week, Secretary of State Colin 
Powell urged President Bush to ensure that, in the event of a surprise attack by 
North Korea, the Office of Homeland Security have full resources and authority 
to respond to any anti-Korean hate crimes. Mr. Powell was expressing the 
concerns of our allies and human-rights advocates. 


  
  

Actually, his real beef concerns the 
technical procedure by which the United States concludes that the terrorists 
held at Guantanamo are not "prisoners of war." (Also, Korean-Americans are the 
greatest Americans, narrowly edging out Cuban-Americans who are the second 
greatest. They would not be complaining about ethnic profiling and military 
tribunals.) 
Powell says we should apply the Geneva Convention to the Guantanamo 
detainees. As he admits, under the convention, the detainees are still not 
prisoners of war, inasmuch as they masquerade as civilians, stage sneak attacks, 
slaughter innocent civilians, pretend they are surrendering and then come out 
shooting, take hostages, hide arms in mosques, and generally do not abide by the 
laws or customs of war. 
Other administration officials have concluded that the Geneva Convention 
doesn't apply in the first place since the detainees masquerade as civilians, 
stage sneak attacks, slaughter innocent civilians, pretend they are surrendering 
and then come out shooting, take hostages, hide arms in mosques, and generally 
do not abide by the laws or customs of war. 
The subtle distinction is this: If I showed up at the Super Bowl this Sunday 
demanding to play for the Patriots, I would be turned away (sadly) on the 
grounds that I am not a member of the Patriots. Not only would my name not 
appear on the team roster, but people would notice that I am a scrawny 99-pound 
weakling. 
Powell's argument is that we should appease our completely useless "allies" 
by playing a make-believe game that I am a Patriot. Then the Patriots would make 
a lengthy, painstaking finding of fact that I am scrawny 99-pound weakling and, 
for that reason alone, conclude that I cannot play in the Super Bowl. 
So the main problem with Powell's position is that it lacks what we used to 
call "a point." 
To be sure, some decades ago a different government of Afghanistan played for 
the Patriots -- that is, was a signatory to the Geneva Convention. But we are 
not at war with Afghanistan. To the contrary! We are the current Afghanistan 
government's biggest best buddy in the whole world, though they seem to think 
the name of our country is "the Pentagon." 
We are at war with al-Qaida. The 158 Guantanamo detainees come from at least 
25 different countries. To pretend that the Taliban is bound by a convention 
signed by an earlier Afghan government because the al-Qaida fighters happened to 
be captured in Afghanistan would be like trying to collect a bill from a 
corporation that bought your debtor's house, razed it, and happened to occupy 
the same property 20 years later. 
The most popular argument for the Powell view is that we have to be nice to 
the detainees, because otherwise people won't be nice to captured American 
soldiers. Which people are we trying to impress by this largesse exactly? Any 
Americans captured by al-Qaida will be tortured, disemboweled and beheaded. 
Indeed, it is difficult to conceive of the United States actually going to 
war against any country that would honor the Geneva Convention. Despite an 
enormous groundswell of support for an attack on France, we probably won't. The 
only people we go to war with are utter savages. 
In World War II, the Japanese tortured and killed American prisoners of war. 
In the Vietnam War, the North Vietnamese tortured American prisoners of war. In 
the Gulf War, Iraq tortured U.S. prisoners of war -- including a female officer 
who was sexually assaulted by her captors. 
So this Geneva Convention thing isn't really working out for us. 
The argument boils down to the claim that we have to treat the detainees the 
way humanrightsniks say we should in order to secure the approval of 
humanrightsniks. Even the late Justice William J. Brennan had more imaginative 
arguments than that. In any event, the humanrightsniks already denounce us as 
racists who engage in barbaric practices like capital punishment. 
Thus far in the war on terrorism, human rights organizations, our "allies," 
criminal defense lawyers and other members of the Democratic coalition have 
complained about the detention of terrorism suspects, complained about military 
tribunals for terrorists, complained about a trial for John Walker, and 
complained about (nonexistent) ethnic profiling at airports. No one in America 
cared. It must be galling to the U.N. human rights commissioner. 
But then, for some reason, the human rights organizations imagined that we 
would be impressed by their whining