Re: [CTRL] Poll-Ooo-Shun
-Caveat Lector- This is not proof read - I do a good job in just getting some things posted. Will redo this for the web site, though most of the basic ideas are already on my web site . Japan backing Aspartame and Monsanto needs to stop. But to think that they are the majority? Not with the way they are using antibiotic soap and poisoning their area too. They need to do a through study of the managial system but they need to start studying history with Charlegmegne. -- Now to go on to the rest of my thread -- With the potential of intananious transportation one central food point - saying that food has to be irradiated, so that people do not realize that humans could be transported (maybe even a brain being "exchanged" on the move) -- anyway a food monopoly - with food and supplies being delivered to you house. They will know all additives so that they can keep track of how human "lab rats" react to the chemicals. The best "lab rats" would be blond, blue eyed ones (like in Ice Land or the Aryans) that do not have all those extra (pesky) genes to worry about. 1960' TV slowed it satellite TV slowed things the Internet stands in the way Over seas things have happened like infants developing breasts. Dioxins are having to be fazed out! It takes three years to be certified organic, yet there are already some farms that are. When the full dioxin / hormone -- dioxin and other chemicals - like herbicides, pesticides, chlorine, and fluoride that we get from plants and animals. thing lands on us, farmers will have no warning since the EPA will not be allowed to post these farms or their products as polluters, so they will lose their farms. Even if they do go organic, have you noticed how many smaller grocery stores are going under? Where will the farmers sell their produce? someone is looking at the potential of putting matter transmission online but before they do that they are putting in irradiation and using antibiotics, and hormones with animals and pesticides, herbicides in food to kill the good bacteria so that e-coli can flourish. Getting the meat packing plants, who owns the banks that are foreclosing on the farm land? Why now? Space travel and the fact that soon education will be a in-fad and lame brains will get shown up for what they are, so the lame brains are going for the monopolies now! Also they are thinking what would someone do if they were sued for a persons potential earnings if that person would have lived 1, 2, or 3 hundred years - Now you know why Zero population growth and why children are surplus. There are some definite reasons why those lame brains should not do their monopoly! When NASA needs people that have multiple degrees people should not be weeded out in the lower grades. Where would we be in space travel if solar had really been allowed to take off. Also when many of the aging population could be the ones to help get space habitat going, what could be another reason why this is happening? Because they need to thin out some of their mistakes - and if they can own the world while they are at it, they think so much the better. Life is diversity, and they advocate getting rid of many of the different ethics. We need the diversity and to study how different areas have adapted to their bacteria. *Nazi white lab rats called Aryans could realize that nutrition is the main reason for IQ -not- genetics. *That many people would not have the time for "hate crimes". *That you can give people back their history - no matter how blood thirsty without a continuance of old feuds since - it seems as if bacteria is the main reason for the feuds. ** consider: Bacteria is male and female in one organism. They spar with their male organs, The one that gets speared is the one that has to use it's resources to replicate. -- high survival index? !! Bacteria is a part of every organism from plants to animals and humans. Humans have bacteria in their stomachs that help them digest food and if that bacteria were not there you would die. Animals have to be more interesting than plants from a bacterial point of view, 1) but plants can live longer 2) do not need animals to survive we need plants to survive 3) can live anywhere in the world which life form would bacteria protect? Any time a major center of civilization has been put together, compiled or collected it has been destroyed. WHY? Because they started bogarting their fertilizer Majority rules - and humans are not the majority, also since we seem to be nothing more than walking fertilizer units - does it matter if we are educated or not? With the amount of interesting bacteria coming in from outer space it seems as if that basic survival index would want to try to go to the source - but not at the risk of being killed here. By my thinking this would mean that many of the Europeans that came to the New World (America) *New World Order* Were homicidal
[CTRL] Poll-Ooo-Shun
-Caveat Lector- From www.publicampaign.org/ouch.html#chemical OUCH! #29 -- August 18, 1999 Chemical Industry Keeps You in the Dark IGNORANCE IS BLISS In 1990, after the Bhopal chemical plant disaster in India, Congress moved to help prevent similar accidents at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. Thousands of facilities that use certain flammable and toxic chemicals were required, under the Clean Air Act, to submit risk management plans to the Environmental Protection Agency and state and local governments. The deadline: June 21, 1999. The core idea was that the public has a right to know about the chemical hazards in their communities, and that local emergency response personnel need advance information to prepare for and prevent possible chemical accidents. In addition, by allowing researchers to collect and compare information about accident risks at existing facilities, safety advocates could set priorities for hazard reduction and determine which companies were taking necessary precautions and which companies were needlessly endangering their neighbors. All that prudent legislation has gone out the window with the passage of the Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act (S. 880). Signed into law by President Clinton in early August, the new law blocks the EPA from posting on the Internet any information about a facility's "offsite-consequence analysis" (that's bureaucrateze for information describing how dangerous a facility currently is)--including worst-case scenarios involving toxic releases or explosions. Only "qualified researchers" may request access to that information, but they are explicitly prohibited from disseminating it in any form, under pain of criminal fines. The only thing companies have to do to demonstrate that they are taking any precautionary action is hold a meeting with local stakeholders sometime in the next six months, summarizing the issues around any worst-case scenario involving a local facility. So much for the public's right-to-know. This approach can be summarized as follows: if there is a danger of a chemical accident, the best solution is to keep the public in the dark as to how bad the risks are and what, if anything, is being done about it. This is a classic case of how moneyed interests, focused hard on a narrow concern, can easily defeat the broader interest when the public isn't paying attention. The chemical industry led the charge for S. 880, its influence rooted in $4 million in PAC donations, soft money and large individual ($200 and up) contributions to congressional candidates in 1997-98. Its allies in the food processing industry, oil and gas producers and refiners, and agricultural fertilizer sectors--all of which are also subject to the Clean Air Act--gave another $22.5 million. Three-quarters of that went to Republicans. The leading sponsors of S. 880 were Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), who raised $432,730 from those industries between 1993 and 1998, and Rep. Tom Bliley (R-VA), recipient of $93,261. Against them were a host of consumer and environmental groups, none of them major campaign contributors. The chemical industry claims that S. 880 was needed to prevent dangerous information from falling into the hands of terrorists, giving them a road map of which plants to attack. Never mind that the EPA had specifically exempted any classified information from being released in facility risk management plans. And forget that from 1987 to 1996, there have been 600,000 accidents reported involving hazardous chemicals--and not one has been caused by terrorists. As it is, S. 880 contains no provisions to improve site security, reduce hazards through inherent safety, or harden facilities against attack. Two-hundred-fifty people, plant-workers as well as people living nearby, die each year from chemical accidents. The more the public knows about those risks, the more the pressure that proper precautions be taken. Which is apparently the last thing the chemical industry wants. - OUCH! is a regular e-mail bulletin on how private money in politics hurts average citizens, published by Public Campaign, a non-partisan, non-profit organization devoted to comprehensive campaign finance reform. Every day, we pay more as consumers and taxpayers for special interest subsidies and boondoggles because of our system of privately financed elections. It's time for a change. Help spread the word! Send copies of this message to your friends and join the growing movement for real campaign finance reform. If you would like to add yourself to the OUCH! listserv, send a one-line e-mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] reading "subscribe ouch". To remove yourself from the list, send a message to the same address reading "unsubscribe ouch".
