-Caveat Lector-
RadTimes # 122 December, 2000
An informally produced compendium of vital irregularities.
"We're living in rad times!"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE:
"Every exploitation of public economy by small minorities leads inevitably
to political oppression, just as, on the other hand, every sort of
political predominance must lead to the creation of new economic monopolies
and hence to increased exploitation of the weakest sections of society. The
two phenomena always go hand in hand."
--Rudolf Rocker, 'Nationalism And Culture'
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How to assist RadTimes--> (See ** at end.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contents:
---------------
--Organizing in the Face of Increased Repression
--Bush campaign spokesman Governor Marc Racicot tied to extreme-right forces
--IPS Releases Study on Corporate Power
--Bush and Gore are neck-and-neck in hypocrisy
--FBI steps up efforts to fight crimes related to computers
--Attack on Luna
Linked stories:
*Cheney Urges Gore to Concede Defeat
*Global: Corruption - A necessary evil?
*If Bush Wins, Watch Out for the Long Knives
*Gun Rights: Power to the People
*The Next Seattle
*The Watchers
*Supreme Court Rules for Bush
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Begin stories:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Organizing in the Face of Increased Repression
by Starhawk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since the very first morning of the Seattle blockade a year ago, the
police forces of the world have greeted the antiglobalization movement with
a high level of violence and repression. As the international movement has
continued on, the repression has fallen into a pattern discernible from DC
to Prague and beyond. This pattern involves:
1. A concerted media campaign by the police and government forces that
begins long before the demonstration, painting the activists as violent
terrorists. All previous demos are equally characterized as violent,
regardless of the actual facts.
2. Surveillance of meetings, email lists, phones, listservs, etc.
3. Attempts at pre-emptive control, which range from mass illegal arrests in
DC the night before the action, shut downs of convergence centers and
IndyMedia centers, and border closures, to declaring a 5-kilometer
no-protest zone five months before the planned action in Quebec.
4. Less obvious violence on the street. Seattle taught them that tear
gassing whole sections of the city was a bad idea. However, tear gas,
pepper spray, beatings, projectile weapons, water cannon and concussion
grenades, etc. are routinely used now from Prague to Cincinnati.
5. Random arrests and targeting of peaceful protestors, while those throwing
rocks are often let go. Maybe nonviolent protestors are easier to catch?
Or maybe this is a concerted effort to discourage wider participation in
these actions?
6. Use of provocateurs. I am not saying that all who throw rocks are
provocateurs. However, there is a growing body of eyewitnesses and stories
of 'protestors' seen one moment throwing a rock at a window and the next,
being sheltered behind a police line to indicate that provocateurs are being
used. Along with them, we can suspect the whole range of fun Cointelpro
tactics.
7. Intimidation and brutality in jail, which reached levels of outright
torture in Prague.
8. Some sporadic attempts to identify and neutralize 'leaders' i.e. holding
John Sellers of Ruckus on a million dollars bail for charges that were all
later dropped.
What fun! It¹s enough to make you think we¹re being effective, especially
when, as in Prague, the protestors still managed to disrupt the meeting and
send the banksters home a day early.
What can we do about it? Are we doomed to have these actions become more
and more dangerous, and smaller and smaller? Or can we succeed in building
a mass movement in spite of repression?
1. The greatest restraint to police violence during an action is the
organizing and alliance building we¹ve done before the action ever happens.
We need to counter their disinformation campaigns with our own community
outreach, to leaflet, to talk to people, to go door to door, to explain to
the community what we¹re doing and why long before we do it.
2. We need to build alliances with labor, churches, NGOs, all the groups who
are fighting the same vested interests. We don¹t have to do the same work
they do, we don¹t have to change our hairstyles or analysis to accommodate
them, but we do need to build bridges so that we can call on them to defend
our‹and their‹civil rights, at the border, on the streets or in jail.
3. We need to train and prepare as many people as possible. The more people
have had a chance to play out a dangerous situation, to think out possible
responses and try out different tactics, the calmer and more resilient
they¹ll be on the streets. Even a few centered people in a crowd can be
enough to prevent panic and spark an effective moment of resistance.
Trainings need to stress flexibility and developing a range of possible
responses to widely varied situations, so activists are prepared in the
moment to make choices about what to do.
4. We also need ever more flexible and creative tactics. The more we can
plan for orchestrated spontaneity, the harder we¹ll be to stop. For
example, in Prague part of the plan was for smaller marches led by flags of
different colors to break away from the main march and go in different
directions. While this tactic had been discussed at open meetings for at
least a month before the action, it still seemed to confuse the authorities.
5. We may need to focus more on preparation for surviving jail, for
resisting intimidation and being prepared for interrogation, than on the
classic jail solidarity tactics we¹ve used in the U.S. Those tactics focus
on attempting to stay in jail where our strength of numbers allows us to
pressure the system to drop or lower charges, and helps to protect
individuals at risk. These tactics were developed, however, in a very
different time, when the authorities often were interested in releasing most
and when jail experiences were often hard and uncomfortable but relatively
decent. At times those conditions still prevail and that kind of jail
solidarity has been effective in Seattle and DC. However, if people are
being chained to the wall and beaten, the focus needs to shift to getting
them out of jail. Solidarity then becomes what people outside jail do to
put political pressure on the system, from calling on allies, phoning,
faxing and emailing the authorities, to blockading the jail itself.
6. Organizing an action needs to include planning post-action and post-jail
support, debriefing, trauma counseling, etc.
7. We need to continue building a broader, larger movement, to find ways to
encourage participation at varied levels of risk, to support a wide variety
of forms of protest that can mobilize different groups of people, to
confront the racism, sexism, classism etc. in our own groups and reach out
to more diversity. Most of all, we need to clarify our vision of the world
we want to create, so we can mobilize peoples¹ hopes and desires as well as
their outrage. And we need to be creative, visionary, wild, sexy, colorful,
humorous, and fun in the face of the violence directed against us.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bush campaign spokesman Governor Marc Racicot tied to extreme-right forces
<http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/nov2000/raci-n27.shtml>
By Jerry White
27 November 2000
The fact that Montana Governor Marc Racicot has emerged as a leading
spokesman for the campaign of George W. Bush says a great deal about the
social and political physiognomy of the Republican Party.
In recent days Racicot, a close friend and advisor to Texas Governor Bush,
has held press conferences and appeared on the Sunday morning news shows,
making allegations of Democratic vote-rigging and whipping up opposition
within the military to a possible victory by Democratic candidate Al Gore.
At one press conference Racicot, citing the rejection of overseas military
ballots by local election officials in Florida, declared, "I am very sorry
to say, but the vice president's lawyers have gone to war, in my judgment,
against the men and women who serve in our armed forces." Such incendiary
language, bordering on incitement to mutiny, has become almost routine in
Republican quarters.
It is the language of the militia groups and white supremacist cults that
have found a comfortable home in Racicot's state, becoming part and parcel
of what the media calls, in its disarming way, the "base" of the Republican
Party in Montana. The cozy relationship between the Republican Party,
including Racicot, and the terrorist fringe was on display two years ago,
at the height of the anti-Clinton impeachment hysteria.
On October 9, 1998 Racicot attended a Republican fundraiser and candidates'
forum in Bozeman, Montana, where Bob Davies, a candidate for the state
legislature, declared that President Clinton "should be shot." Davies said
he routinely uttered that sentiment in response to voters who asked about
his stand on the impeachment controversy.
Davies also told the forum that Clinton was guilty of treason and should be
executed for selling satellite technology to the Chinese government,
likening the president to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who were electrocuted
as Soviet spies at the height of the 1950s McCarthyite witch-hunt.
Neither Racicot nor any of the other Republican officials at the forum
interrupted Davies, opposed his threats against the president, or reported
Davies' comments to law enforcement agencies, even though advocating
attacks against the president is a federal crime. Davies' comments only
came to light two days later when one of those in attendance at the meeting
wrote a letter to a local newspaper, declaring, "I am filled with disgust
when I hear someone like Bob Davies who is running for public office
advocate violence against other public officials."
In the aftermath of the October 1998 forum, Racicot did not respond to
reporters' inquiries about Davies' remarks for nearly a week. He finally
issued a perfunctory statement disassociating himself from the threats
against Clinton. The director of the state Republican Committee told the
World Socialist Web Site at the time that the party would not retract its
endorsement of Davies' campaign.
Racicot's political rise is indicative of the far-right character of
Republican politics in Montana, where the party has close ties with racist
and anti-Semitic organizations, including paramilitary militia groups like
the Montana Freeman and the Militia of Montana. The thinly-populated
Western state has seen an influx of wealthier, conservative social layers
trying to escape the more racially- and ethnically-diverse, and politically
liberal, West Coast.
Top elected officials, including Republican Congressman Rick Hill, have
appeared at militia gatherings and the party has solicited support from
these organizations for political campaigns. In August of 1999, the Montana
Human Rights Network reported that Republican Senator Conrad Burns' office
had sent a letter to the Militia of Montana appealing for support against
the "gun control crusade" in the US Congress, a reference to pending
legislation requiring background checks at gun shows. The senator's
spokesman insisted there was nothing wrong with writing to the militia, a
sentiment that was immediately echoed by John Trochmann, the leader of
Militia of Montana, whose ties to the white supremacist Aryan Nation are
well known.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IPS Releases Study on Corporate Power
<http://www.ips-dc.org/top200.htm>
Study Reinforces Public Distrust of Corporations
View Report (Adobe Acrobat format):
<http://www.ips-dc.org/downloads/Top_200.pdf>
On the first anniversary of the Seattle protests that shut down
negotiations of the World Trade
Organization, the Institute for Policy Studies is releasing a study that
shows:
Of the world's 100 largest economic entities, 51 are now corporations and
49 are countries;
The world's top 200 corporations account for over a quarter of economic
activity on the
globe while employing less than one percent of its workforce.
According to study co-author Sarah Anderson, "The Seattle protestors
expressed their anger at
institutions like the WTO for elevating the interests of large corporations
over everyone else. We
analyzed just how powerful the world's biggest firms are and our findings
are staggering."
Other key findings include:
The Top 200 corporations' combined sales are bigger than the combined
economies of all
countries minus the biggest 10.The Top 200s' combined sales are 18 times
the size of the
combined annual income of the 1.2 billion people (24 percent of the total
world population)
living in "severe" poverty.
Between 1983 and 1999, the profits of the Top 200 firms grew 362.4 percent,
while the
number of people they employ grew by only 14.4 percent.
A full 5 percent of the Top 200s' combined workforce is employed by
Wal-Mart, a company
notorious for union-busting and widespread use of part-time workers to
avoid paying benefits.
U.S. corporations dominate the Top 200, with 82 slots (41 percent of the
total). Japanese
firms are second, with only 41 slots.
Of the U.S.corporations on the list, 44 did not pay the full standard 35
percent federal
corporate tax rate during the period 1996-1998. Seven of the firms
(including the world's
largest, General Motors) actually paid less than zero in federal income
taxes in 1998 (because
of rebates).
Between 1983 and 1999, the share of total sales of the Top 200 made up by
service sector
corporations increased from 33.8 percent to 46.7 percent.
To receive a paper or email version, contact Sarah Anderson, tel:
202/234-9382 or email:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bush and Gore are neck-and-neck in hypocrisy
<http://www.townhall.com/columnists/stevechapman/sc2000124.shtml>
December 4, 2000
To become president of the United States, says the Constitution, a person
has to be at least 35 years old and a "natural born citizen."
Conniving, dissembling, opportunistic snakes are not disqualified, which is
a good thing for George W. Bush and Al Gore. Not that either side is
incapable of honesty. Both Democrats and Republicans accuse their opponents
of trying to steal the election, and both are right. Each side is striving
to prevent the other from winning through unfair and unscrupulous means, so
that it can win through unfair and unscrupulous means.
The warring parties bring to mind the 17th-century Puritans, who allegedly
came to America in search of religious freedom. Actually, they wanted
religious freedom only for themselves, not for anyone else. Gore and Bush
each want to exploit the various types of electoral unfairness to his own
advantage, not wipe it out.
What partisans portray as a battle over principle looks more like the Super
Bowl of hypocrisy. Bush has argued against hand recounts, and particularly
against including "dimpled chads." Yet he signed a law in Texas authorizing
those very practices. Letting human beings inspect disputed ballots one by
one is dangerously subjective in Florida, but indispensable to honest
elections in the Lone Star State.
Gore claims that all he wants is a fair count of all the votes cast in
Florida. But he hasn't stopped other Democrats from suing to exclude
absentee ballots in Seminole County, which conveniently would deprive Bush
of several thousand votes. The vice president's passion for inclusiveness
is also absent when it comes to absentee ballots from military personnel
stationed abroad: Hundreds of them have been rejected because they lack
postmarks. It's Bush's attorneys, not Gore's, who went to court insisting
that those votes be counted.
Republicans say state law gives counties just seven days to report their
vote totals, and that the limit must be enforced even if some counties need
more time for recounts. The extension ordered by the Florida Supreme Court,
they say, amounts to a flagrant rewriting of the law. At the same time,
Bush and Co. think it would be horribly unjust for election boards to
actually abide by that law requiring postmarks, because it means some
military votes (which tend to go Republican) won't be counted.
Should we enforce the law as written, or should we make adjustments to get
a better measure of the will of the people? Bush and Gore have a clear,
coherent answer: Enforce the law when it will help me, and don't when it
won't.
Democrats were pleased when Secretary of State Katherine Harris was told
she couldn't enforce the seven-day rule but had to abide by the Sunday,
Nov. 26 deadline established by the Florida Supreme Court. But when Palm
Beach County election officials took Thanksgiving off and then wanted yet
another extension, Democrats thought Harris should disregard the timetable
established by the court and grant extra time entirely on her own.
Republicans have taken pride in the near-riot by Bush supporters, "newly
assertive Republicans," in the admiring words of conservative writer Peggy
Noonan, at the Miami-Dade county board offices, which helped induce the
board to abandon a recount that would have helped Gore. If a raucous
protest led by Jesse Jackson had intimidated election officials in a GOP
stronghold, do you think Noonan would be praising the demonstrators'
assertiveness?
Democrats are fond of resolving disputes by turning to the federal
government, which they trust more than state and local bodies. But it's
Gore taking the position that the U.S. Supreme Court should stay out of the
squabble because it's the rightful province of the state of Florida. Bush,
whose party is usually the champion of state sovereignty, wants the Supreme
Court to rule that Florida's state courts can't be trusted to interpret
their own laws and need benevolent guidance from Washington.
Gore says it's critical that every vote be counted. But from the start, his
real concern has been on getting recounts only in counties where he might
gain votes, taking advantage of Bush's failure to ask for recounts within
72 hours after the election, the time limit set by law.
Early on, the two candidates could have asked Katherine Harris to authorize
a statewide recount to find out who really got the most votes, and the
chances are good she would have agreed. But neither was much interested in
that option. Each could think of an option that would be better, better for
himself, that is.
When Election Day arrived, the country was divided more or less equally
between those who disliked Gore and those who disliked Bush. Before long,
Americans may be united in detesting them both.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FBI steps up efforts to fight crimes related to computers
<http://web.lexis-nexis.com/more/cahners-chicago/11407/6592826/1>
by Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
November 26, 2000
The FBI has opened its first multiagency, multijurisdictional office
aimed at combating the escalation of computer-related crimes and has
assigned it the task of acquiring, archiving and analyzing digital
evidence in support of criminal investigations.
The new facility, located in San Diego, is designed as a prototype for
new regional laboratories being established across the country.
"The role of the computer forensics examiner will become increasingly
more important as criminals continue to exploit emerging computer
technology," says FBI Director Louis J. Freeh.
"As we have found on the national level, joining forces with other
federal, state and local agencies produces higher levels of service in
the full range of cases where computers are either used to facilitate
crime or the computer itself is the target of a criminal act," he
says.
Attorney General Janet Reno has called for an aggressive effort to
combat computer crimes, saying government and industry need to work
together to determine what should be done both to increase security
and to catch criminals.
Mr. Freeh has urged Congress to consider expanding the use of the
federal racketeering law, known as RICO - traditionally used against
organized-crime figures and drug cartels - to apply against computer
criminals. He also has urged members of Congress to lower the $5,000
minimum in damages that victim companies must suffer before attackers
can be prosecuted under federal computer crime laws.
The new San Diego office, known as the Regional Computer Forensics
Laboratory, consists of computer forensic examiners from the FBI, Drug
Enforcement Administration, Defense Criminal Investigative Service,
Naval Criminal Investigative Service, U.S. Customs Service, San Diego
County Sheriff's Office and District Attorney's Office, California
Highway Patrol and police departments in Chula Vista, El Cajon,
Escondido, La Mesa and San Diego.
FBI officials say it is organized into three main functions: imaging,
analysis, and research and development. The officials say examiners
will rotate among those assignments, allowing each to develop a
variety of skills.
Each of the examiners, the FBI says, will be given responsibility for
quality control and training. The bureau says as the volume and
complexity of computer evidence submissions grow, the laboratory's
flexible structure will allow it to adapt and seek whatever additional
training, equipment or other resources are needed to complete the job.
"Computer crimes have become the crimes of this century," says San
Diego Sheriff Bill Kolender. "We are experiencing a large increase in
the number of people who are victims of fraud, identity theft and
other offenses. We in the sheriff's department are very pleased to be
a part of this task force."
San Diego Police Chief David Bejarano says that because of the
"explosion of high-technology and associated crimes," the new facility
is a welcome addition to his department's effort to control computer
crime.
"This ensures that we will have highly trained examiners - using
state-of-the-art technology and investigative techniques - to support
federal, state and local investigations and prosecutions," Mr.
Bejarano says.
Mr. Freeh says that with the creation of the San Diego office, law
enforcement authorities will have the "best-trained computer forensics
examiners, functioning as one team," that will be able to "utilize
state-of-the-art facilities to perform complex examinations."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attack on Luna
<www.circleoflifefoundation.org>
ANCIENT REDWOOD TREE LUNA WHERE JULIA BUTTERFLY HILL LIVED FOR OVER TWO
YEARS HAS BEEN ILLEGALLY CUT AND ENDANGERED
The small hamlet of Stafford, California is the site of a landslide that
originated on PL/Maxxam land that destroyed seven families' homes.
Stafford is also home to the Stafford Giant, an ancient redwood tree now
known to
the world as Luna. The tree was named Luna by forest activists who used
the light of the full moon to rig a treesitting platform 180 feet high in
the redwood in October, 1997.
On December 10, 1997 Julia Butterfly Hill climbed into the tree to
protect the magnificent redwood and to help make the world aware of the plight
of the ancient forests. From her perch she carried out a tremendous amount
of outreach to politicians, religious leaders, school children and citizens
worldwide. After two years of risking her life, Julia, with the help of
members of the US Steelworkers of America and other forest activists,
successfully negotiated the permanent protection of Luna and a nearly
three-acre buffer zone.
The tree was protected by a Deed of Covenant, similar to a conservation
easement that is held by the land trust Sanctuary Forest. The Luna
Preservation Agreement, signed by Julia Hill and PL/Maxxam Corp., was
designed to protect Luna in perpetuity so the tree could live for
another millennium.
On Thanksgiving weekend it was discovered that a critical cut had been
made into Luna by a large chainsaw. The perpetrator made one deep and precise
cut that went through a significant portion of the tree. While the tree
is still alive and standing, Luna is extremely vulnerable to a windstorm.
Judging from the precision of the cut and the fresh sawdust, the
criminal action appears to have been committed by an experienced treefaller
within the last few days.
Julia Butterfly was devastated to learn of the injury to Luna, "Luna is
the greatest teacher and best friend I have ever had. I gave two years of my
life to ensure that she could live and die naturally. But two years is
nothing compared to the thousand years she has lived, providing shelter,
moisture and oxygen to forest inhabitants. It kills me that the last 3%
of the ancient redwoods are being desecrated. I feel this vicious attack on
Luna as surely as if the chainsaw was going through me. Words cannot
express the deep sorrow that I am experiencing but I am as committed as
ever to do everything in my power to protect Luna and the remaining
ancient forests."
Circle of Life Foundation and Sanctuary Forest are researching what can
be done to stabilize the critically injured tree. There is a criminal
investigation at the crime site for clues as to who may have committed
this spiteful and malevolent action against this permanently protected tree.
The forests surrounding Luna are sacrifice zones that were not protected
under the Headwaters Forest Agreement. Other sacrifice zones include the
old-growth Douglas fir forests on Rainbow Ridge in the Mattole River
watershed. Police convoys are actively trying to stop forest activists
from defending these forested steep slopes that are slated to be clearcut
during this rainy season.
Please send prayers and healing thoughts to Luna and ancient trees
everywhere.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linked stories:
********************
Cheney Urges Gore to Concede Defeat
<http://tm0.com/IHT/sbct.cgi?s=80180978&i=282270&d=687555>
As legal wheels turned through the weekend, Dick Cheney, the
Republican vice presidential candidate, said Sunday that it was
time for Al Gore to concede defeat in the U.S. presidential
election.
********************
Global: Corruption - A necessary evil?
<http://library.northernlight.com/FB20001201950000182.html?cb=0&dx=1006&sc=0#doc>
Worldwide, corruption costs at least $80-billion a year. Attempts to end
the corruption
of foreign nationals have met with resistance. So how realistic is it to
think we can put an
end to the practice?
********************
If Bush Wins, Watch Out for the Long Knives
<http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/US_election_race/Story/0,2763,406095,00.html>
A lot of the extended Bush support system - businesses, the right wing,
family members, etc. - are just waiting to pull out the shivs. A British
paper offers up an excellent analysis of who are the puppeteers behind
Junior. And it's a pretty scary picture.
********************
Gun Rights: Power to the People
<http://www.sierratimes.com/dantre.htm>
"Why don't the politicians want us to own weapons? What are the
politicians afraid of?
That we're all going to kill each other? I don't think so. The politicians
are afraid of
an armed populace. And they're supposed to be."
********************
The Next Seattle
<http://www.inthesetimes.com/web2501/slaughter2501.html>
Naomi Klein talks about the movement's future.
********************
The Watchers
<http://www.inthesetimes.com/web2501/berkowitz2501.html>
Multinationals take aim at protesters.
********************
Supreme Court Rules for Bush
<http://news.findlaw.com/ap/a/p/1130/12-4-2000/20001204165754430.html>
********************
======================================================
"Anarchy doesn't mean out of control. It means out of 'their' control."
-Jim Dodge
======================================================
"Communications without intelligence is noise;
intelligence without communications is irrelevant."
-Gen. Alfred. M. Gray, USMC
======================================================
"It is not a sign of good health to be well adjusted to a sick society."
-J. Krishnamurti
______________________________________________________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe or for a sample copy or a list of back issues,
send appropriate email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
______________________________________________________________
**How to assist RadTimes:
An account is available at <www.paypal.com> which enables direct donations.
If you are a current PayPal user, use this email address:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, to contribute. If you are not a current user, use this
link: <https://secure.paypal.com/refer/pal=resist%40best.com> to sign up
and contribute. The only information passed on to me via this process is
your email address and the amount you transfer.
Thanks!
______________________________________________________________
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
