Re: Risk and insurance

2000-10-24 Thread Bill Stewart

Archives are on www.inet-one.com

At 02:50 PM 10/23/00 +0300, Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Tim May wrote:

The book I recommended a week or two ago, Judea Pearl's "Causality," 
is much more advanced in its mathematics. (But the math is important 
if one is actually trying to construct the causality diagrams Pearl 
is talking about.)

Would it be too much to ask you to recant the main point made? It sounds
pretty interesting...

Sampo Syreeni [EMAIL PROTECTED], aka decoy, student/math/Helsinki university




Thanks! 
Bill
Bill Stewart, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639




Re: Risk and insurance

2000-10-23 Thread Sampo A Syreeni

On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, R. A. Hettinga wrote:

 recant

"Recount", right?

So right it hurts. GOD!

Asking Tim, or anyone else here for that matter, me included, to recant
something, is, of course, an invitation to verbal violence. :-).

You can say that again. For less, even, as I well know. Every once in a
while I just hate not being a native.

Sampo Syreeni [EMAIL PROTECTED], aka decoy, student/math/Helsinki university




Re: Risk and insurance

2000-10-23 Thread Tim May

At 2:50 PM +0300 10/23/00, Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Tim May wrote:

The book I recommended a week or two ago, Judea Pearl's "Causality,"
is much more advanced in its mathematics. (But the math is important
if one is actually trying to construct the causality diagrams Pearl
is talking about.)

Would it be too much to ask you to recant the main point made? It sounds
pretty interesting...

I'll recount it, but not recant it.

Think of spacetime diagrams, a la the lightcones of Minkowski 
diagrams. Events A and B precede Event C.

The same kind of diagrams obviously apply in ordinary events, without 
regard to the speed of light. A directed acyclig graph (DAG) of 
various events, some in the "causal chain" leading to some Event C, 
some outside the causal chain.

Pearl addresses Bayesian networks in terms of DAGs and provides tools 
for analyzing when events actually "cause" other events. Of great 
interest for deciding when, for example, some drug test produces 
meaningful results, when some legal proof of causality is being 
challenged, etc.

Pearl doesn't produce some magical formula for separating causes from 
non-causes, just a bunch of theorems and corollaries which may be 
useful in policy analysis, experiment design, and just thinking about 
the world. I think of it as a kind of "network analysis," akin to 
tools for circuit analysis (like Kirchoff's Law, for example).

More discussion is of course available at Amazon or in search engines.


--Tim May
-- 
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:
Timothy C. May  | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
"Cyphernomicon" | black markets, collapse of governments.




Risk and insurance

2000-10-22 Thread Greg Broiles

At 12:33 AM 10/22/00 -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Nathan Saper wrote:

  So these people are entitled to something for nothing?
  (or in this case, $1500 of treatment for $1000 of premiums)?
 
 That's the whole idea of insurance, isn't it?
 

You're trolling, aren't you?

Insurance is a good idea for the insured because it takes
money to make money.

On the topic of risk and insurance, and apropos discussion of reading 
lists, cypherpunks may find the book "Against the gods: The remarkable 
story of risk" by Peter Bernstein of interest.

--
Greg Broiles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Risk and insurance

2000-10-22 Thread Tim May

At 2:44 PM -0700 10/22/00, Greg Broiles wrote:
At 12:33 AM 10/22/00 -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Nathan Saper wrote:

  So these people are entitled to something for nothing?
  (or in this case, $1500 of treatment for $1000 of premiums)?

That's the whole idea of insurance, isn't it?


You're trolling, aren't you?

Insurance is a good idea for the insured because it takes
money to make money.

On the topic of risk and insurance, and apropos discussion of 
reading lists, cypherpunks may find the book "Against the gods: The 
remarkable story of risk" by Peter Bernstein of interest.

I support this recommendation. A readable book for the layman (most 
of us), on a par with past classics like "Lying with Statistics" and 
"Lady Luck." Available in a trade paperback for about $15 or so.

The book I recommended a week or two ago, Judea Pearl's "Causality," 
is much more advanced in its mathematics. (But the math is important 
if one is actually trying to construct the causality diagrams Pearl 
is talking about.)

--Tim May
-- 
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:
Timothy C. May  | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
"Cyphernomicon" | black markets, collapse of governments.