Notification of Limited Account Access
Dear PayPal Member!Attention! Your PayPal account has been violated!Someone with ip address 149.225.126.87 tried to access your personal account!Please click the link below and enter your account information to confirm that you are not currently away. You have 3 days to confirm account information or your account will be locked. Click here to activate your account You can also confirm your email address by logging into your PayPal account at http://www.paypal.com/. Click on the "Confirm email" link in the Activate Account box and then enter this confirmation number: 1036-8535-4511-9500-3892Thank you for using PayPal!The PayPal Team Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and choose the "Help" link in the footer of any page. PayPal Email ID PP059 Protect Your Account Info Make sure you never provide your password to fraudulent websites.To safely and securely access the PayPal website or your account, open a new web browser (e.g. Internet Explorer or Netscape) and type in the PayPal login page (http://www.paypal.com/) to be sure you are on the real PayPal site.PayPal will never ask you to enter your password in an email.For more information on protecting yourself from fraud, please review our Security Tips at https://www.paypal.com/en/securitytips Protect Your Password You should never give your PayPal password to anyone.
Policy Violation
The following message sent by this account has violated system policy: From: cypherpunks@minder.net To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:15:36 +0530 Subject: Mail Transaction Failed The following violations were detected: --- Scan information follows --- Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] File Attachment: message.pif Attachment Status: deleted
Len Adleman (of R,S, and A): Universities need a little Limbaugh
A little humor this morning... He's right, but it's still funny. Expect Dr. Adleman to be asked to turn in his Liberal Secret Decoder Ring forthwith... Cheers, RAH --- http://www.dailynews.com/cda/article/print/0,1674,200%257E20951%257E2872499,00.html Los Angeles Daily News Universities need a little Limbaugh By Leonard M. Adleman Saturday, May 14, 2005 - Pomp and circumstance. Black-robed students receiving diplomas as proud parents look on. Distinguished members of society receiving honorary degrees and offering sage advice to ''America's future.'' It is commencement time again at the nation's universities. This year I nominated Rush Limbaugh for an honorary doctorate at the University of Southern California, where I am a professor. Why Limbaugh _ a man with whom I disagree at least as much as I agree? Here are some of the reasons I gave in my letter of nomination: ''Rush Limbaugh has engendered epochal changes in politics and the media. He has accomplished this in the noblest of ways, through speech and the power of his ideas. Mr. Limbaugh began his career as a radio talk-show host in Sacramento in 1984. He espoused ideas that were conservative and in clear opposition to the dominant ideas of the time. Perhaps because of the persuasiveness of Mr. Limbaugh's ideas or because they resonated with the unspoken beliefs of a number of Americans, his audience grew. Today, he has the largest audience of any talk show host (said to be in excess of 20 million people per week) and his ideas reverberate throughout our society. ''Mr. Limbaugh is a three-time recipient of the National Association of Broadcasters' Marconi Radio Award for Syndicated Radio Personality of the Year. In 1993, he was inducted into the National Association of Broadcasters' Broadcasting Hall of Fame. ''In 1994, an American electorate, transformed by ideas that Mr. Limbaugh championed, gave control of Congress to the Republicans for the first time in 40 years. That year, Republican congressmen held a ceremony for Mr. Limbaugh and declared him an 'honorary member of Congress.' The recent re-election of President Bush suggests that this transformation continues. One of Mr. Limbaugh's major themes through the years has been liberal bias in the 'mainstream' media. His focus on this theme has made him the target of incessant condemnation. Nonetheless, he has persevered and it now appears that his view is prevailing. As the recent debacle at CBS shows, the media is in the process of major change. Ideally, the American people will profit from a reconstituted media that will act more perfectly as a marketplace for ideas.'' But there is a bigger reason why I support giving him an honorary degree: Because I value intellectual diversity. Regrettably, the university declined to offer Limbaugh a degree. As best I can determine, no university has honored him in this way. On the other hand, such presumably liberal media luminaries as Dan Rather, Chris Matthews, Judy Woodruff, Bill Moyers, Terry Gross, Paul Krugman and Peter Arnett have received many honorary degrees from the nation's universities. Now before you label me as a right-wing ideologue, let me present my credentials as a centrist. Limbaugh has well-known positions on the following issues: abortion, capital punishment, affirmative action, prayer in school, gun control, the Iraq war. I disagree with him on half of these. But intellectual diversity has all but vanished from America's campuses. We are failing in our duty to provide our students with a broad spectrum of ideas from which to choose. Honoring Limbaugh, or someone like him, would help to make the academy more intellectually diverse. The great liberal ideas that swept through our universities when I was a student at Berkeley in the 1960s have long ago been digested and largely embraced in academia. Liberalism has triumphed. But a troubling legacy of that triumph is a nation whose professorate is almost entirely liberal. In the 29 years I have been a professor, I do not recall encountering a single colleague who expressed conservative ideas. The left-wing accusations of Ward Churchill (Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters, Alfred University, 1992) are not the problem _ the problem is the scarcity of professors who are inclined to rebut them. It is time for the nation's universities to address this disturbing situation. So I hereby extend my nomination of Limbaugh to all universities. It would be a refreshing demonstration of renewed commitment to intellectual diversity if next spring we hear Dr. Limbaugh's words as our graduates ''go forth.'' Professor Leonard M. Adleman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Computer Science at the University of Southern California. -- - R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/ 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA ... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
RE: Len Adleman (of R,S, and A): Universities need a little Limbaugh
Now that was an enjoyable and even marginally relevant piece of RAHspam. From: R.A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cryptography@metzdowd.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Len Adleman (of R,S, and A): Universities need a little Limbaugh Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:39:56 -0400 A little humor this morning... He's right, but it's still funny. Expect Dr. Adleman to be asked to turn in his Liberal Secret Decoder Ring forthwith... Cheers, RAH --- http://www.dailynews.com/cda/article/print/0,1674,200%257E20951%257E2872499,00.html Los Angeles Daily News Universities need a little Limbaugh By Leonard M. Adleman Saturday, May 14, 2005 - Pomp and circumstance. Black-robed students receiving diplomas as proud parents look on. Distinguished members of society receiving honorary degrees and offering sage advice to ''America's future.'' It is commencement time again at the nation's universities. This year I nominated Rush Limbaugh for an honorary doctorate at the University of Southern California, where I am a professor. Why Limbaugh _ a man with whom I disagree at least as much as I agree? Here are some of the reasons I gave in my letter of nomination: ''Rush Limbaugh has engendered epochal changes in politics and the media. He has accomplished this in the noblest of ways, through speech and the power of his ideas. Mr. Limbaugh began his career as a radio talk-show host in Sacramento in 1984. He espoused ideas that were conservative and in clear opposition to the dominant ideas of the time. Perhaps because of the persuasiveness of Mr. Limbaugh's ideas or because they resonated with the unspoken beliefs of a number of Americans, his audience grew. Today, he has the largest audience of any talk show host (said to be in excess of 20 million people per week) and his ideas reverberate throughout our society. ''Mr. Limbaugh is a three-time recipient of the National Association of Broadcasters' Marconi Radio Award for Syndicated Radio Personality of the Year. In 1993, he was inducted into the National Association of Broadcasters' Broadcasting Hall of Fame. ''In 1994, an American electorate, transformed by ideas that Mr. Limbaugh championed, gave control of Congress to the Republicans for the first time in 40 years. That year, Republican congressmen held a ceremony for Mr. Limbaugh and declared him an 'honorary member of Congress.' The recent re-election of President Bush suggests that this transformation continues. One of Mr. Limbaugh's major themes through the years has been liberal bias in the 'mainstream' media. His focus on this theme has made him the target of incessant condemnation. Nonetheless, he has persevered and it now appears that his view is prevailing. As the recent debacle at CBS shows, the media is in the process of major change. Ideally, the American people will profit from a reconstituted media that will act more perfectly as a marketplace for ideas.'' But there is a bigger reason why I support giving him an honorary degree: Because I value intellectual diversity. Regrettably, the university declined to offer Limbaugh a degree. As best I can determine, no university has honored him in this way. On the other hand, such presumably liberal media luminaries as Dan Rather, Chris Matthews, Judy Woodruff, Bill Moyers, Terry Gross, Paul Krugman and Peter Arnett have received many honorary degrees from the nation's universities. Now before you label me as a right-wing ideologue, let me present my credentials as a centrist. Limbaugh has well-known positions on the following issues: abortion, capital punishment, affirmative action, prayer in school, gun control, the Iraq war. I disagree with him on half of these. But intellectual diversity has all but vanished from America's campuses. We are failing in our duty to provide our students with a broad spectrum of ideas from which to choose. Honoring Limbaugh, or someone like him, would help to make the academy more intellectually diverse. The great liberal ideas that swept through our universities when I was a student at Berkeley in the 1960s have long ago been digested and largely embraced in academia. Liberalism has triumphed. But a troubling legacy of that triumph is a nation whose professorate is almost entirely liberal. In the 29 years I have been a professor, I do not recall encountering a single colleague who expressed conservative ideas. The left-wing accusations of Ward Churchill (Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters, Alfred University, 1992) are not the problem _ the problem is the scarcity of professors who are inclined to rebut them. It is time for the nation's universities to address this disturbing situation. So I hereby extend my nomination of Limbaugh to all universities. It would be a refreshing demonstration of renewed commitment to intellectual diversity if next spring we hear Dr. Limbaugh's words as our graduates ''go forth.'' Professor Leonard M. Adleman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Computer Science at the University of Southern
Re: Len Adleman (of R,S, and A): Universities need a little Limbaugh
Now before you label me as a right-wing ideologue, let me present my credentials as a centrist. Limbaugh has well-known positions on the following issues: abortion, capital punishment, affirmative action, prayer in school, gun control, the Iraq war. I disagree with him on half of these. Any speculations on which half? My guess is that he agrees on affirmative action and gun control (opposing both) and probably the Iraq war (a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged, and many people took 9/11 personally). He certainly disagrees on prayer in school, probably on capital punishment (opposing both, while Limbaugh supports them), and probably supports abortion rights, which Limbaugh opposes. CP
Re: /. [Dissidents Seeking Anonymous Web Solutions?]
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/13/0250226 [1]DocMurphy asks: I'm working with some dissidents who are looking for ways to use the Internet from within repressive regimes. Many have in-home Internet access, but think it too risky to participate in pro-freedom activities on home PCs. Internet cafis are also available, but although fairly anonymous, every machine may be infected with keystroke loggers that give governments access to and knowledge of 'banned' sites. Dissidents not only want to remain anonymous themselves, but also wish to not compromise the sites they access. Any suggestions for products/procedures/systems out there making anonymous access publishing a reality under repressive regime run Internet access? There were some good ideas presented, the best of which were probably to first compose an email at home, then PGP encrypt it, then stego-ize it, then put it on a USB token and bring it to the internet cafe, and send it there. For receiving, download a bunch of junk from a mailing list used for this purpose onto the token, go home and de-stego and de-PGP it. This doesn't work though for web browsing. For that you need a real time channel. You can go to various proxies, and some people run them specifically to help the Chinese, the slashdot replies talked about this. But first, the Chinese block them when they find out, and second, it makes you look suspicious if you're visiting one. Be nice if there were a high bandwidth stego channel that was widely available. For example, imagine an open source P2P multi player game which intentionally included a reasonably high bandwidth channel of random data. It would be a service to the public to play this game and thereby provide people who need it the ability to communicate undetectably. Dissidents could use a hacked version which would replace some of the random noise bits with their messages. Only the recipients could distinguish the results from noise. CP
Security Microsoft Windows Update May 2005
Title: Microsoft Microsoft All Products | Support | Search | Microsoft.com Guide Microsoft Home MS Client This is the latest version of security update, the "May 2005, Cumulative Patch" update which resolves all known security vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express. Install now to maintain the security of your computer from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could allow an attacker to run code on your computer. This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches. System requirements Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP This update applies to MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later Recommendation Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity. How to install Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box. How to use You don't need to do anything after installing this item. To download the update use the link below Download Update. Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us. Thank you for using Microsoft products. Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies. The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners. Contact Us | Legal | TRUSTe ©2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Accessibility
Len Adleman (of R,S, and A): Universities need a little Limbaugh
A little humor this morning... He's right, but it's still funny. Expect Dr. Adleman to be asked to turn in his Liberal Secret Decoder Ring forthwith... Cheers, RAH --- http://www.dailynews.com/cda/article/print/0,1674,200%257E20951%257E2872499,00.html Los Angeles Daily News Universities need a little Limbaugh By Leonard M. Adleman Saturday, May 14, 2005 - Pomp and circumstance. Black-robed students receiving diplomas as proud parents look on. Distinguished members of society receiving honorary degrees and offering sage advice to ''America's future.'' It is commencement time again at the nation's universities. This year I nominated Rush Limbaugh for an honorary doctorate at the University of Southern California, where I am a professor. Why Limbaugh _ a man with whom I disagree at least as much as I agree? Here are some of the reasons I gave in my letter of nomination: ''Rush Limbaugh has engendered epochal changes in politics and the media. He has accomplished this in the noblest of ways, through speech and the power of his ideas. Mr. Limbaugh began his career as a radio talk-show host in Sacramento in 1984. He espoused ideas that were conservative and in clear opposition to the dominant ideas of the time. Perhaps because of the persuasiveness of Mr. Limbaugh's ideas or because they resonated with the unspoken beliefs of a number of Americans, his audience grew. Today, he has the largest audience of any talk show host (said to be in excess of 20 million people per week) and his ideas reverberate throughout our society. ''Mr. Limbaugh is a three-time recipient of the National Association of Broadcasters' Marconi Radio Award for Syndicated Radio Personality of the Year. In 1993, he was inducted into the National Association of Broadcasters' Broadcasting Hall of Fame. ''In 1994, an American electorate, transformed by ideas that Mr. Limbaugh championed, gave control of Congress to the Republicans for the first time in 40 years. That year, Republican congressmen held a ceremony for Mr. Limbaugh and declared him an 'honorary member of Congress.' The recent re-election of President Bush suggests that this transformation continues. One of Mr. Limbaugh's major themes through the years has been liberal bias in the 'mainstream' media. His focus on this theme has made him the target of incessant condemnation. Nonetheless, he has persevered and it now appears that his view is prevailing. As the recent debacle at CBS shows, the media is in the process of major change. Ideally, the American people will profit from a reconstituted media that will act more perfectly as a marketplace for ideas.'' But there is a bigger reason why I support giving him an honorary degree: Because I value intellectual diversity. Regrettably, the university declined to offer Limbaugh a degree. As best I can determine, no university has honored him in this way. On the other hand, such presumably liberal media luminaries as Dan Rather, Chris Matthews, Judy Woodruff, Bill Moyers, Terry Gross, Paul Krugman and Peter Arnett have received many honorary degrees from the nation's universities. Now before you label me as a right-wing ideologue, let me present my credentials as a centrist. Limbaugh has well-known positions on the following issues: abortion, capital punishment, affirmative action, prayer in school, gun control, the Iraq war. I disagree with him on half of these. But intellectual diversity has all but vanished from America's campuses. We are failing in our duty to provide our students with a broad spectrum of ideas from which to choose. Honoring Limbaugh, or someone like him, would help to make the academy more intellectually diverse. The great liberal ideas that swept through our universities when I was a student at Berkeley in the 1960s have long ago been digested and largely embraced in academia. Liberalism has triumphed. But a troubling legacy of that triumph is a nation whose professorate is almost entirely liberal. In the 29 years I have been a professor, I do not recall encountering a single colleague who expressed conservative ideas. The left-wing accusations of Ward Churchill (Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters, Alfred University, 1992) are not the problem _ the problem is the scarcity of professors who are inclined to rebut them. It is time for the nation's universities to address this disturbing situation. So I hereby extend my nomination of Limbaugh to all universities. It would be a refreshing demonstration of renewed commitment to intellectual diversity if next spring we hear Dr. Limbaugh's words as our graduates ''go forth.'' Professor Leonard M. Adleman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Computer Science at the University of Southern California. -- - R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/ 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA ... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
RE: Len Adleman (of R,S, and A): Universities need a little Limbaugh
Now that was an enjoyable and even marginally relevant piece of RAHspam. From: R.A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cryptography@metzdowd.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Len Adleman (of R,S, and A): Universities need a little Limbaugh Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:39:56 -0400 A little humor this morning... He's right, but it's still funny. Expect Dr. Adleman to be asked to turn in his Liberal Secret Decoder Ring forthwith... Cheers, RAH --- http://www.dailynews.com/cda/article/print/0,1674,200%257E20951%257E2872499,00.html Los Angeles Daily News Universities need a little Limbaugh By Leonard M. Adleman Saturday, May 14, 2005 - Pomp and circumstance. Black-robed students receiving diplomas as proud parents look on. Distinguished members of society receiving honorary degrees and offering sage advice to ''America's future.'' It is commencement time again at the nation's universities. This year I nominated Rush Limbaugh for an honorary doctorate at the University of Southern California, where I am a professor. Why Limbaugh _ a man with whom I disagree at least as much as I agree? Here are some of the reasons I gave in my letter of nomination: ''Rush Limbaugh has engendered epochal changes in politics and the media. He has accomplished this in the noblest of ways, through speech and the power of his ideas. Mr. Limbaugh began his career as a radio talk-show host in Sacramento in 1984. He espoused ideas that were conservative and in clear opposition to the dominant ideas of the time. Perhaps because of the persuasiveness of Mr. Limbaugh's ideas or because they resonated with the unspoken beliefs of a number of Americans, his audience grew. Today, he has the largest audience of any talk show host (said to be in excess of 20 million people per week) and his ideas reverberate throughout our society. ''Mr. Limbaugh is a three-time recipient of the National Association of Broadcasters' Marconi Radio Award for Syndicated Radio Personality of the Year. In 1993, he was inducted into the National Association of Broadcasters' Broadcasting Hall of Fame. ''In 1994, an American electorate, transformed by ideas that Mr. Limbaugh championed, gave control of Congress to the Republicans for the first time in 40 years. That year, Republican congressmen held a ceremony for Mr. Limbaugh and declared him an 'honorary member of Congress.' The recent re-election of President Bush suggests that this transformation continues. One of Mr. Limbaugh's major themes through the years has been liberal bias in the 'mainstream' media. His focus on this theme has made him the target of incessant condemnation. Nonetheless, he has persevered and it now appears that his view is prevailing. As the recent debacle at CBS shows, the media is in the process of major change. Ideally, the American people will profit from a reconstituted media that will act more perfectly as a marketplace for ideas.'' But there is a bigger reason why I support giving him an honorary degree: Because I value intellectual diversity. Regrettably, the university declined to offer Limbaugh a degree. As best I can determine, no university has honored him in this way. On the other hand, such presumably liberal media luminaries as Dan Rather, Chris Matthews, Judy Woodruff, Bill Moyers, Terry Gross, Paul Krugman and Peter Arnett have received many honorary degrees from the nation's universities. Now before you label me as a right-wing ideologue, let me present my credentials as a centrist. Limbaugh has well-known positions on the following issues: abortion, capital punishment, affirmative action, prayer in school, gun control, the Iraq war. I disagree with him on half of these. But intellectual diversity has all but vanished from America's campuses. We are failing in our duty to provide our students with a broad spectrum of ideas from which to choose. Honoring Limbaugh, or someone like him, would help to make the academy more intellectually diverse. The great liberal ideas that swept through our universities when I was a student at Berkeley in the 1960s have long ago been digested and largely embraced in academia. Liberalism has triumphed. But a troubling legacy of that triumph is a nation whose professorate is almost entirely liberal. In the 29 years I have been a professor, I do not recall encountering a single colleague who expressed conservative ideas. The left-wing accusations of Ward Churchill (Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters, Alfred University, 1992) are not the problem _ the problem is the scarcity of professors who are inclined to rebut them. It is time for the nation's universities to address this disturbing situation. So I hereby extend my nomination of Limbaugh to all universities. It would be a refreshing demonstration of renewed commitment to intellectual diversity if next spring we hear Dr. Limbaugh's words as our graduates ''go forth.'' Professor Leonard M. Adleman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Computer Science at the University of Southern
