Re: Police Worried About New Vest-Penetrating Gun

2005-01-16 Thread Justin
On 2005-01-15T09:38:23+, Justin wrote:
 On 2005-01-14T15:42:18-0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
 
  Seems like scare-mongering to me, not a practical concern.
 
 Of course it's not a practical concern.  Criminals already have access
 to handguns that will defeat common soft body armor.  This media panic
 was instigated by a press release from the Violence Policy Center, which
 has evidently (for now) given up trying to pass a new assault weapon
 ban, and is instead finding new legislative targets.

I didn't remember which group it was, and I guessed wrong.  It wasn't
the VPC.  It was the Brady Campaign/MMM.
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=41691

-- 
War is the father and king of all, and some he shows as gods, others as men; 
some he makes slaves, others free. -Heraclitus 53



Re: Police Worried About New Vest-Penetrating Gun

2005-01-16 Thread Justin
On 2005-01-14T16:54:32-0500, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
 
 http://www.wnbc.com/print/4075959/detail.html
 Police Worried About New Vest-Penetrating Gun

I care?  Well, perhaps I do... I should go pick one up before they're
banned.

  The most shocking fact may be that the gun -- known as the five-seven --
 is being marketed to the public, and it's completely legal

The name is Five-seveN.  It's made by Fabrique Nationale (FN).

Allegedly the U.S. secret service likes the Five-seveN, along with the
FN P90 (unavailable to civilians except title 2 firearms dealers because
it's only made in a select-fire version).  They both use the same 5.7mm
rounds, which makes logistics easier.  Of course, they also use MP5s and
9mm handguns...

Other guns with civilian-legal armor-piercing ammo include the CZ-52,
.223 pistols, and most all rifles.

 At a distance of 21 feet, Trumball police Sgt. Lenny Scinto fired the
 five-seven with the ammo sold legally to the public into a standard police
 vest. All three penetrated the vest.

The real ammo penetrates CRISAT/PAGST armor at 100m and 300m
respectively.  Level 2 or 3a armor is really rather pathetic.

 Back in Trumball, Scinto said his officers would have to rethink how to
 protect the public and protect themselves.

Police have no duty to protect the public.  Anyway, most of the public
doesn't walk around wearing vests, so protecting the public from these
is no different than protecting them from other firearms.  Protecting
the police from these is no different than protecting them from rifles.
Only trauma plates can stop pointy, high-velocity rounds.

 This is going to add a whole new dimension to training and tactics. With
 the penetration of these rounds, you're going to have to find something
 considerably heavier than we normally use for cover and concealment to stop
 this round, Scinto said.

Cool, more LEOs instantly recognizable as beetles, having exoskeletons.
I recommend Kafka's Metamorphoses to them as sociological grounding for
what sort of reaction they can expect.

-- 
War is the father and king of all, and some he shows as gods, others as men; 
some he makes slaves, others free. -Heraclitus 53



Re: Police Worried About New Vest-Penetrating Gun

2005-01-16 Thread Justin
On 2005-01-14T15:42:18-0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
 
 At 01:54 PM 1/14/2005, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
 
 http://www.wnbc.com/print/4075959/detail.html
 NEW YORK -- There is a nationwide alert to members of law enforcement
 regarding a new kind of handgun which can render a bulletproof vest
 useless, as first reported by NewsChannel 4's Scott Weinberger.
 ...
 The weapon is light, easily concealable and can fire 20 rounds in seconds
 without reloading.
 
 A couple of questions to the gunpunks out there...
 I've heard that rifles easily penetrate bullet-proof vests,
 and that vests are really only useful against average-to-small handguns
 and against shotguns.  Is this accurate?

There are various levels of body armor specified by the NIJ.  In order
of effectiveness (lower to higher): Levels IIa, II, IIIa, III, and IV.
http://www.nlectc.org/txtfiles/BodyArmorStd/NIJSTD010103.html

Level IV typically takes the form of a trauma plate and is put into a
pouch in the front (and/or in the back) of soft body armor.  III and IV
are heavier, bulkier, and as a result aren't used as much.

The NIJ standards are based on stopping standard bullets up to certain
velocity limits (preventing them from going through the vest), _plus_
backface deformation limits.  They put the vests over geletin, and the
volume displaced by the vest when it absorbs the shot is measured and
must be less than a specified limit.  There is a lot of sentiment that
this testing method is crap, and all that should matter is whether the
bullet goes through the vest.  Or at least that backface deformation
should be less heavily emphasized.

Then there are other specifications outside of the NIJ scheme; for
instance, the there's PAGST and CRISAT body armor.  I don't recall
what they stand for.

 Any idea how much you can saw off a rifle
 and still have it penetrate typical cop vests?

A lot.  5.56mm pistols (based on the AR-15 and available from olympic
arms or bushmaster, among other manufacturers) are perfectly legal and
will shoot through IIIa vests.  The real jump up is between IIIa and
III; the former mainly stops handgun rounds, while the latter allegedly
stops standard .223 and .308 loads, but I'm not sure... before I looked
it up just now, I thought only level IV trauma plates stopped .308.
Cops typically wear level II or IIIa armor.

And even trauma plates will not stop repeated hits to the same area.  If
you expect to be shot at with a rifle, you do not want to be out in the
open where many hits are unavoidable.  Ceramic plates weaken through
chipping, and metal plates weaken through stress/deformation.

 (And I assume the 20 rounds in seconds is just a scary way to say
 it has a big magazine and you have to pull the trigger 20 times.)

Of course.  Otherwise it would be a machine gun, and new machine guns
are not available to civilians... and haven't been since the 1986
Firearm Owners Protection Act.

The anti-gun forces try hard to associate the assault weapons ban expiry
with the availability of machineguns.  They are lying.

 Also, the police expressed worry that criminals might hear about
 these guns and then the cops would be in big trouble.

This gun, the Five-seveN, has been available for years.  What hasn't
been available for years, I don't think, is the practice non-AP
ammunition.  And, of course, some FFLs (gun dealers) are unwilling to
sell the Five-seveN to private citizens.

 Sounds silly to me - while some criminals might buy a
 cop-killer handgun for bragging rights,
 random criminals presumably only buy weapons useful for the
 scenarios they imagine being in,

Other armor-piercing handguns include .223 pistols and the CZ 52; there
are also nasty rounds, though generally unavailable, for 9mm handguns
that will penetrate IIIa armor.  Ordinary rounds at +P+ pressures may
even do it.  

The Five-seveN bullets have a muzzle velocity about half-way between
handgun bullet velocities and rifle bullet velocities.  Given the round
diameter (5.7mm) and the short barrel (compared to rifles) of the
Five-seveN, it's essentially a rifle round.  5.56mm pistols fire rounds
with nearly the same diameter, though they weigh more (5.7mm bullets are
~~30gr, standard 5.56mm is 55 or 62gr) and therefore require more powder
to achieve the same velocities.  Hence the longer cartridges for 5.56mm
(I use .223 and 5.56 interchangably; they're technically not the same
thing but close enough for government work).

Most .223 pistols are based on the AR-15, so their magazines attach
outside of the pistol grip and make them look scarier.  That also makes
them slightly less concealable, which is why they're not being attacked
by the anti-gun forces.  Perhaps the anti-gunners don't think they're
legal.

 which is Saturday Night Specials for most applications,
 or whatever currently fashionable Mac10/Uzi/etc.
 for druglord armies that expect to be shooting at each other,
 or rifles for distance work and dual-use pickup-truck decoration.

Uzis, MP5s, short-barrelled 

Police Worried About New Vest-Penetrating Gun

2005-01-14 Thread R.A. Hettinga
http://www.wnbc.com/print/4075959/detail.html

wnbc.com

Police Worried About New Vest-Penetrating Gun


NEW YORK -- There is a nationwide alert to members of law enforcement
regarding a new kind of handgun which can render a bulletproof vest
useless, as first reported by NewsChannel 4's Scott Weinberger.

New Gun Frightens Police
Scott Weinberger

 The most shocking fact may be that the gun -- known as the five-seven --
is being marketed to the public, and it's completely legal

It was a very difficult decision for members of law enforcement to go
public about the new weapon, but officers fear that once word of the weapon
begins to circulate in the wrong circles, they will be in great danger.
They agreed to speak to NewsChannel 4, hoping the public will understand
what they call the most devastating weapon they face.

The weapon is light, easily concealable and can fire 20 rounds in seconds
without reloading.

This would be devastating, said Chief Robert Troy, of the Jersey City
Police Department.

Troy said he learned about the high-powered pistol from a bulletin issued
by Florida Department of Law Enforcement to all of its agents. Troy
believes faced with this new weapon, his officers would be at a total
disadvantage.

Dealing with a gun like this -- it's a whole new ballgame, Troy said.

Troy is not the only member of law enforcement to voice concern. As
NewsChannel 4 began to contact several more departments in the Tri-State
Area, it turned out that officers in Trumball, Conn., had seized one of
these handguns during a recent arrest.

Certainly, handguns are a danger to any police officer on any day, but one
that specifically advertised by the company to be capable of defeating a
ballistic vest is certainly the utmost concern to us, said Glenn Byrnes,
of the Trumball Police Department.

However, the company said that bullet is not sold to the public. Instead,
gun buyers can purchase what the company calls a training or civilian
bullet -- the type loaded into the gun confiscated by Trumball police.

At a distance of 21 feet, Trumball police Sgt. Lenny Scinto fired the
five-seven with the ammo sold legally to the public into a standard police
vest. All three penetrated the vest.

The bullets even went through the back panel of the vest, penetrating both
layers.

In a similar test, an officer fired a .45-caliber round into the same vest.
While the shot clearly knocked it down, it didn't penetrate the vest, and
an officer would likely have survived the assault.

The velocity of this round makes it a more penetrating round -- that's
what had me concerned, Scinto said.

FN Herstal told NewsChannel 4 that they dispute the test, stating, Most
law enforcement agencies don't have the ability to properly test a
ballistic vest.

When NewsChannel 4 asked how this could have happened, the spokesperson
said: We [the company] are not experts in ballistic armor.

Back in Trumball, Scinto said his officers would have to rethink how to
protect the public and protect themselves.

This is going to add a whole new dimension to training and tactics. With
the penetration of these rounds, you're going to have to find something
considerably heavier than we normally use for cover and concealment to stop
this round, Scinto said.

In Jersey City, Troy said he will appeal to lawmakers, hoping they will
step in before any of his officers are confronted with the five-seven.

This does not belong in the civilian population. The only thing that comes
out of this is profits for the company and dead police officers, Troy
said. I would like the federal government to ban these rounds to the
civilian public.

-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'



Re: Police Worried About New Vest-Penetrating Gun

2005-01-14 Thread Bill Stewart
At 01:54 PM 1/14/2005, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
http://www.wnbc.com/print/4075959/detail.html
NEW YORK -- There is a nationwide alert to members of law enforcement
regarding a new kind of handgun which can render a bulletproof vest
useless, as first reported by NewsChannel 4's Scott Weinberger.
...
The weapon is light, easily concealable and can fire 20 rounds in seconds
without reloading.
A couple of questions to the gunpunks out there...
I've heard that rifles easily penetrate bullet-proof vests,
and that vests are really only useful against average-to-small handguns
and against shotguns.  Is this accurate?
Any idea how much you can saw off a rifle
and still have it penetrate typical cop vests?
(And I assume the 20 rounds in seconds is just a scary way to say
it has a big magazine and you have to pull the trigger 20 times.)
Also, the police expressed worry that criminals might hear about
these guns and then the cops would be in big trouble.
Sounds silly to me - while some criminals might buy a
cop-killer handgun for bragging rights,
random criminals presumably only buy weapons useful for the
scenarios they imagine being in,
which is Saturday Night Specials for most applications,
or whatever currently fashionable Mac10/Uzi/etc.
for druglord armies that expect to be shooting at each other,
or rifles for distance work and dual-use pickup-truck decoration.
Do many criminals expect to initiate shootouts with vest-wearing cops
in scenarios where a rifle isn't practical?
Do most cops wear bullet-proof vests regularly other than in
holdup/hostage SWAT situations, where the criminal might have rifles anyway,
and where a regular pistol is just fine for shooting hostages?
Or is this mainly a problem for the cases when cops want to stage
military-style pre-dawn assaults on people's houses,
where they expect that the targets usually only have
pistols handy near the bed and don't have time for rifles?
Seems like scare-mongering to me, not a practical concern.



Bill Stewart  [EMAIL PROTECTED]