[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide

2019-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin






June 29



GLOBAL:

UN General Assembly adopts controversial resolution on torture-free trade



The General Assembly on Friday adopted a controversial resolution, which aims 
to establish common international standards for torture-free trade.


The draft resolution, introduced by Romania, was adopted with 81 votes in 
favor, 20 against and 44 abstentions.


The resolution requests the secretary-general to seek the views of member 
states on the feasibility and possible scope of a range of options to establish 
common international standards for the import, export and transfer of goods 
used for capital punishment and for torture or other cruel, inhuman or 
degrading treatment or punishment.


It asks the secretary-general to submit a report on the subject to the General 
Assembly at its 2019-20 session.


It also requests the secretary-general to establish a group of governmental 
experts to examine, beginning in 2020, the feasibility and scope of the goods 
to be included, and draft parameters for a range of options to establish common 
international standards on the matter.


It asks for the transmission of the report of the group of experts to the 
General Assembly for consideration at its 2020-21 session.


Before and after the vote, 20 countries voiced their opposition or reservations 
concerning the draft resolution. The concerns concentrated on the indicated 
linkage between torture and the death penalty, the ambiguity in language that 
may have impacts on trade, as well as the lack of consultations.


(source: xinhuanet.com)








IRAN:

Khamenei’s ‘Upgrade Plan for the Judiciary’ Is a Plan to Increase Execution and 
Torture in Iran




The Iranian regime’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, has spoken several times, 
albeit in vague terms, of a ‘Upgrade Plan for the Judiciary,’ without ever 
explaining exactly what that meant.


When introducing Ebrahim Raisi as Chief Justice on March 7, 2019, Khamenei 
mentioned the plan in his nomination decree. Again he did not elaborate much, 
but called the plan one of “revitalizing and resuming public rights and 
protecting the people’s legitimate liberties.” He also emphasized a few points, 
of which the most important were “the need for firmness” and “presence of 
revolutionary youth” in the Judiciary.


On Wednesday June 26, in the traditional annual meeting entitled “Week of 
Justice,” evidently Raisi raised the question, and Khamenei answered that it 
was necessary to precipitate to implement the plan, again without much ado.


But it was not hard to guess, through Khamenei’s words, on the content of the 
so-called Upgrade Plan for the Judiciary. It was also evident that the plan’s 
implementation was vital to Khamenei for which he is in big hurry. He went so 
far as to say the plan had to be “implemented without delay” and he stressed 
the need for “timely, brave execution based on genuine methods.”


It was clear from what he said that the plan’s true nature was “increasing 
repression.” In his Wednesday speech, Khamenei mentioned the need for showing 
“firmness and might.” Experience has shown that in the regime’s jargon those 
words have no other meaning than increasing repression.


But why the secrecy?

The reason Khamenei keeps a plan of which the consequences would be felt by the 
people on the streets of Iran clearly is that he and the whole of his regime 
have much less leeway in repression now. While the regime needs the repression 
as much as oxygen, the same repression can backfire in the form of popular 
unrest and riots able to threaten the regime’s stability.


The ability to oppress is directly proportional to the elements of power that 
Khamenei and the regime have.


If one looks at the forty year history of Iran’s regime, one notes that 
repression was harshest in the 1980s. The reason is that, having exploited to 
the full the exceptional historical circumstances, the regime’s founder 
Ruhollah Khomeini had been able to combine political and religious power in 
himself after usurping the leadership of the anti-monarchist revolution.


But Khamenei lacks absolutely such exceptional power.

Internally, the regime faces such crisis that Khamenei is obliged to embolden 
his forces on a daily basis to prevent desertion and loss of will.


Internationally, while Khomeini enjoyed support in the East as well as the 
West, the regime’s current isolation has reached a point where Khamenei and his 
entourage are sanctioned by name.


The regime’s foundation stands on a society on the verge of explosion, with 
Khamenei himself calling that social “cleavage,” that if activated, would lead 
to a social earthquake.


In his Wednesday speech, Khamenei pointed to deep social hatred towards the 
regime’s oppressive apparatus, under the term “unleashed virtual space” 
reactions towards the mullahs’ justice department, and reassured his henchmen 
that they should not be afraid of such reactions.


Thus Khamenei is obliged to play a double game. On 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, MISS., OKLA., S.DAK., N.MEX., CALIF., USA

2019-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin







June 29




TEXAS2 new execution dates

Execution dates set for 2 more Texas death row prisoners



2 more Texas death row prisoners — a North Texas man man who stabbed his family 
and an Aryan gang member from El Paso who strangled a woman — are now scheduled 
for execution this year.


Robert Sparks was sentenced to die in 2008 after a chaotic trial in Dallas 
County, where he was convicted of murdering his wife and 2 stepsons before 
raping his stepdaughter. He still has pending appeals in the case, but a judge 
this week greenlit a Sept. 25 execution date, court records show.


Justen Hall was sent to death row in 2005, 3 years after strangling a woman 
with an electrical cord. He is slated to die on Nov. 6, according to a prison 
spokesman.


The Lone Star State has executed 3 men so far in 2019, and with the addition of 
the 2 new execution dates, there are 8 more prisoners scheduled to die this 
year.


Just after midnight on Sept. 15, 2007, Sparks put his hand over the mouth of 
his wife, Chare Agnew, and stabbed her 18 times in her bed, according to court 
records. Then, one at a time, he woke up his stepsons — 9-year-old Harold and 
10-year-old Raekwon — and stabbed them 45 times each, dragging their bodies 
into the living and stashing them under a comforter.


Next, he went after the girls, raping his 14-year-old stepdaughter on the couch 
while her younger sister watched. Afterward, he apologized to them for the 
rapes and murders — but said their mother had been trying to poison him.


He was arrested a few days later and tried the following year. On appeal, he 
raised concerns about the possibility of false testimony offered by A.P. 
Merillat, a state expert who told the court about the prison classification 
system and claimed that Sparks could still pose a threat behind bars.


That claim is currently in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, along with one 
about how a bailiff’s courtroom attire may have biased the jury. During the 
punishment phase of trial — when jurors decided on whether Sparks deserved to 
die by lethal injection — one of the bailiffs wore a necktie with an image of a 
syringe on it.


It’s not clear whether the jury could see that tie, and so far courts have 
decided it wasn’t enough to make a difference in the outcome of the case.


The attorneys representing Sparks — Seth Kretzer and Jonathan Landers — this 
week questioned the decision to set an execution date with litigation still 
pending in court.


“The Office of the Attorney General, which represents the state, filed a motion 
asking for more time,” Kretzer told the Chronicle, “and yet the district 
attorney’s office wants an immediate execution date. There’s no reason to force 
the Supreme Court’s hand.”


The other condemned prisoner added to the list of upcoming executions has been 
on death row for nearly 15 years for a murder stemming from a fight outside 
drug house in El Paso.


On Oct. 28, 2002, Melissa Billhartz got in fight with a man she knew, and the 
dispute escalated into an assault. Afterward, she said she wanted to call 
police - and Hall and his friends became worried, fearing authorities would 
discover the meth house.


The others opposed that plan, according to court records, but Hall left and a 
few hours later showed up with the woman’s body in the back of a truck. He then 
ordered a friend to go bury her and cut off her fingers with a machete so 
police couldn’t find any DNA.


In the early years after he was sentenced to die, Hall asked to give up his 
appeals. Later, his attorneys raised concerns about DNA testing on the cord 
used to kill Billhartz, and suggested his confession was coerced.


But in 2016, Hall again asked to waive his appeals in a letter to the court.

“These walls 24/7 have broken me,” he wrote. “It is taking every last ounce of 
will to even make it from day to day.”


The following year, he told a judge he was guilty and ready to die, assuring 
the court he was mentally competent to make that decision. His attorney on 
Friday did not respond to a request for comment.


(source: Houston Chronicle)



State to seek death penalty in 2 capital murder cases



McLennan County prosecutors announced Friday that they will seek the death 
penalty against 2 capital murder defendants.


For the first time since the cases were indicted, the district attorney's 
office announced Keith Antoine Spratt and Christopher Paul Weiss will face the 
death penalty in separate cases.


First Assistant District Attorney Nelson Barnes made the announcements Friday 
during a status hearing in Spratt's case, saying that "with the facts of this 
case and the defendant's background," his office will seek the death penalty.


Barnes declined additional comment on the case. Waco attorney, Russ Hunt, who 
will represent Spratt along with his son, Russ Hunt Jr., said he was surprised 
by the announcement.


"We will be ready and we will do our best for Mr. Spratt,"