Bug#82018: udma66 boot floppies should use current 2.2.1?-ide kernel
Actually, since I have not tested them myself, I cannot make such a statement. Regards, /Karl --- Karl HammarAsp Data [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lilla Asp 2340 +46 173 140 57Networks S-742 94 sthammar +46 70 511 97 84 Computers Sweden Consulting --- From: Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#82018: udma66 boot floppies should use current 2.2.1?-ide kernel Date: 12 Jan 2001 19:11:11 -0500 You're not exactly clear. The remedy for this bug (and the others mentioned) is simply to use the kernel-image-2.2.18-ide package rather than kernel-image-2.2.18pre21-ide ? -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Boot CVS: aph
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot Module name:boot-floppies Changes by: aph 01/01/14 10:48:30 Modified files: documentation/pt: rescue-boot.sgml Log message: fix tagging error -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#81685: kernel doesn't have serial console
"Eray Ozkural (exa)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't detect a bug about DHCP/BOOTP, What bug are you referring to? I use DHCP with the boot-floppies all the time, and it works fine for me. and it seems they are not present in the default configuration in kernel-source... package. Is it the case with kernel-image? Well, I don't know exactly which config option you are looking for, but you can look in the various 'kernel-config' files in the boot-floppies area of the archive. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preloading add-on drivers from an extra floppy?
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How does one use that feature? dbootstrap's messages do not explain clearly the expected directory structures. Yes, they wanna be in /lib/modules/section (just remove the kernel-version part). This is mentioned in the documentation at least. perhaps it should be mentioned in the actual dialogs in dbootstrap if someone wants to fix that. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: base bug maint
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 81524 bootparamd Bug#81524: base: bootparamd package can not remove Bug reassigned from package `base' to `bootparamd'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ltmodem.o fixes Re: Winmodem test disk
Marvin Stodolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marco, Mark and I will surely be interested in your 2.2.18 patch. Please send it to us. Yes. You might want to consider also providing a URL where people can get the module, based on the stock Debian kernels, if not perhaps file a bug requestion on the deiban images that these patches be applied. Regarding the shipping of a separate module, it is now possible to have an "extra" disk which provides kernel modules which will be added, which is precisely for these cases of proprietary of whatever hardware where hte stock kernels can't or don't provide support. Anyhow, if we wanted to provide that, I could put a link off http://www.d.o/releases/potato/ . Let me know. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Boot CVS: aph
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot Module name:boot-floppies Changes by: aph 01/01/14 14:59:47 Modified files: documentation : install.sgml Log message: update copyright notice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#81685: kernel doesn't have serial console
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:57:31PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: "Eray Ozkural (exa)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't detect a bug about DHCP/BOOTP, What bug are you referring to? I use DHCP with the boot-floppies all the time, and it works fine for me. I must have looked in the wrong place. Thanks. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#80325: Installer misreports partition numbers
Still kernels should have BSD disklable support as well i think Its neccessary for Solaris. I would be more comfortable if you checked it against the kernel (or fdisk, I guess) sources. extended partition will always follow primary partitions, following this will be BSD or solaris on a first come first serve basis. The previous patch i did always put BSD before SOLARIS which is wrong But not quite- its ok with BSD But look at this dmesg output: Partition check: hda: hda1 hda2! hda3 solaris: [s0] hda5 [s1] hda6 [s2] hda7 [s7] hda8 hda4 hda9 hda10 hda11 hda12 hda13 hda14 hda15 hda16 hda17 I means what you see: BSD slices at the end, sol. after partition. fdisk calls it /dev/hda7, mount /dev/hda11. But Extended hda4 is hda4... and this large swap partition gets "mkswapped" more than once (but not by debian linux): /dev/hda3 * 783 1566 6288408 82 Linux (Auslagerung) thats how a solaris partition with slices inside looks to linux. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Boot CVS: aph
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot Module name:boot-floppies Changes by: aph 01/01/14 15:52:26 Modified files: documentation/en: dbootstrap.sgml Log message: change title of sect "base-config-shadow" -- god, I hate the word "support" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Boot CVS: aph
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot Module name:boot-floppies Changes by: aph 01/01/14 15:55:40 Modified files: debian : changelog Log message: recent doc changes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#70798: UDMA66 boot problem/HPT370
Adam Di Carlo wrote: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Adam Di Carlo wrote: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just tested the 2.2.17-ide and 2.2.18-ide kernels and they both detect a HPT370 chip Where does this lead us? Are you saying the HPT370 problems should be fixed as of 2.2.18-ide (as opposed to 2.2.18pre21-ide which we are using now)? Well, i just tried the 2.2.18-ide kernel and detects the HPT370 chip as well, so i guess we should look elsewhere for the casue of failure. I don't see how that follows, since the latest release version of boot-floppies uses the 2.2.18pre21-ide kernel. Can you try with that kernel and see if it also detects the controller? Soryy, i should read my email before i send it, the first time i tried it with 2.2.17-ide and 2.2.18-ide, both worked, then i went back and tried 2.2.18pre21-ide and that also detected the HPT370. Glenn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#80325: Installer misreports partition numbers
Christoph Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Still kernels should have BSD disklable support as well i think Its neccessary for Solaris. I would be more comfortable if you checked it against the kernel (or fdisk, I guess) sources. extended partition will always follow primary partitions, following this will be BSD or solaris on a first come first serve basis. The previous patch i did always put BSD before SOLARIS which is wrong But not quite- its ok with BSD But look at this dmesg output: Partition check: hda: hda1 hda2! hda3 solaris: [s0] hda5 [s1] hda6 [s2] hda7 [s7] hda8 hda4 hda9 hda10 hda11 hda12 hda13 hda14 hda15 hda16 hda17 I means what you see: BSD slices at the end, sol. after partition. Um, hum. According to the Linux+FreeBSD HOWTO, the slices and such are numbered according to the order in which the primary partition that holds them occurs. Thus if you are on i386 and your DOS extended partitions are off hda4, but you had *BSD partitons off hda3, then it would look something like: ... hda3 hda5 hda6 hda7 hda4 hda8 hda9 hda10 ^^ ^^^ *BSD partititions extended partitions fdisk calls it /dev/hda7, mount /dev/hda11. Yah, not much I can do about that. We've documented it at least. So long as the kernel and dbootstrap agree, I'm happy. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: boot problems
Sorry my reply has take so long. Scott Kersey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am trying to install Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r2 (3 disks) on a Dell laptop. I ran through the initial installation off the CD using the default options. After that, I am not able to boot off the rescue CD, hard drive, or rescue floppy. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Here are the specifics: My machine is a: Dell Inspiron 8000 Notebook, 15" SXVGA (1400x1050), PIII 700MHz, 32MB ATI range mobility chip set graphics card, 20GB HD, 192MB RAM, PICMIA ethernet card, Psion Gold card PICMIA modem, external mouse, dual partition with Windows ME (the disk was partitioned using Partition magic: 15GB for Linux with 800MB swap space) When Booting Off the rescue CD: I type "rescue root = /dev/hda6" at the "boot:" prompt. Why are you typing this? this is completely contrary to the installation Manual and the documentation. There is some danish tutorial floating around that instructs to do this, but it doesn't make sense. The command line you gave means "use the kernel on this floppy, but mount root off an existing linux root partition, hda6". Based on what you said you are doing, that doesn't make any sense -- you don't have anything on /dev/hda* at all yet. Don't type *anything* -- just hit return and you will boot off the floppy, CD, or whatever. Whoever told you otherwise, please hit them with a very very large clue bat. Repeatedly. The last error message I get before hanging up is: "Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 01:00". Not a bug -- this is the kind of errors that occur if you give the wrong arguments. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: boot-floppies on Toshiba Tecra 8100
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hii everyone, happy new year ! I've just installed Debian on my new Toshiba Tecra 8100 laptop and it wasn't easy hehe but I finally got it running. My main concern is : the laptop doesn't want to boot from the debian cd's (cd1 or cd2 from 2.2r0). 2 points : 1) I can boot other laptops with these cd's thus they aren't broken. 2) I can boot the Tecra with other cd-roms. I've tried it with both home burnt and commercial cd's. Adam, is this a know problem ? Searching the mailing lis archive doesn't return anything related. No, it's not a known problem. It's either a BIOS config issue, a hardware issue, or a syslinux issue. I suggest you pursue those avenues. There's not much we can do here on boot-floppies except try to be sure that syslinux issues, when found, are filed properly as bugs against syslinux. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: regarding potato images
Jim Westveer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Good idea! Disk #4 will now have the udma66 kernel loaded onto it. (debian-cd CVS has been updated) So for i386/potato/woody the boot kernels are: CD#1: default kernel from boot-disks(i386) CD#2: compact CD#3: idepc CD#4: udma66 CD#n: default kernel from boot-disks(i386) Excellent. I've updated the Installation Manual to talk about booting from different CDs to get different flavors, with the caveat that CDs 3 and 4 require 2.2r3 or better. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Boot CVS: aph
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot Module name:boot-floppies Changes by: aph 01/01/14 16:18:25 Modified files: documentation/en: dbootstrap.sgml Log message: change the reference to *BSD stuff since it's not really i386 only -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Boot CVS: zw
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:boot-floppies
Changes by: zw 01/01/14 16:28:36
Added files:
utilities/dbootstrap/po: zh_CN.po
Log message:
Initial check-in for Chinese-GB2312 translation. Thanks hashao and
debian-chinese-{gb,big5}@lists.debian.org a.k.a. Debian-Zh.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#61802: problems in Alpha boot-floppies documentation
Well, we have a reference to the *BSD stuff in the CVS version of the installation manual now. The other stuff is pretty flat-out Alpha specific and there's not much I can do if no alpha developers volunteer to improve the alpha installation manual. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#80325: Installer misreports partition numbers
damnit, ive stuffed up, for the 2.2.x kernels extended partitions (msdos, bsd, solaris) are shown as they are discovered irrespective of there type, but for 2.4.x kernels msdos style kernels are always shown first followed by whichever has the lowest primary partition number. So basicaly as libfdisk isnt mainly going to used for 2.2.x my patch will provide incorrect behaviour. Rather than just reversing it, it would be best if i tested for versions prior to setting the order, incase we do want to use 2.4.x For reference in the 2.2.18 source code look at drivers/block/genhd.c from line 650 In the 2.4.0 code look in fs/partitions/msdos.c from line 440 Sorry about that. Glenn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ltmodem.o fixes Re: Winmodem test disk
The ltmodem.o compile kits are being officially mounted at http://walbran.org/sean/linux/stodolsk/. The URL for the next upgrade which I'm 2.4.0 testing for Mark is http://www.test.dclabs.com.au/linmodem/ the ltmodem-5.78e2.tar.gz It is VERY easy to compile a ltmodem.o using the kit components and kernel-header-packages. There is an issue of legality about providing compiled modules as contrasted to the compile kit. I'm excerpting here from an email of Marco Giordani (concerning the 2.2.nn - 2.4.0-test11 patches), as I'm not erudite on these issues. Original Message Subject: Re: ltmodem works on 2.4.0test11 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:40:06 +0100 From: Marco Giordani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: LinModems [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 03:41:23PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: As far as I can see, this is forbidden. You take GPL-ed serial.c, then statically link it against closed-source piece of software. That is violation of GPL. I'm afraid you're wrong here. The patch I posted was against serial.c (and it is allowed by the GPL license). I didn't post the final object, because _that_ would have been bad. bye, Marco. --- With respect to Debianizing, Mark Spieth has put commands in the README for ltmodem.tar.gz -- ltmodem.o --- ltmodem.rpm and alien ltmodem.rpm does take it to an effective ltmodem.deb though a pause at alien -g ltmodem.rpm is still desirable to achieve Debian standards with added Documentation/Depends/Conflicts. We would be Delighted if someone more Experience than (negligible) I took over the Debianizing step. I've been spending more than an hour a day in "Fire Control" on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Incidentally, professionally I'm a biologist administrator with no formal comp-sci training. I just stumbled into this because my company laptop has an embedded Lucent modem, and decided to return help for my early Linux years. MarvS === Adam Di Carlo wrote: Marvin Stodolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marco, Mark and I will surely be interested in your 2.2.18 patch. Please send it to us. Yes. You might want to consider also providing a URL where people can get the module, based on the stock Debian kernels, if not perhaps file a bug requestion on the deiban images that these patches be applied. Regarding the shipping of a separate module, it is now possible to have an "extra" disk which provides kernel modules which will be added, which is precisely for these cases of proprietary of whatever hardware where hte stock kernels can't or don't provide support. Anyhow, if we wanted to provide that, I could put a link off http://www.d.o/releases/potato/ . Let me know. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#80325: Installer misreports partition numbers
there type, but for 2.4.x kernels msdos style kernels are always shown partitions---^ So basicaly as libfdisk isnt mainly going to used for 2.2.x my patch is-^ g Glenn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#80325: Installer misreports partition numbers
Here we go again.
The attached patch reverts to the old behaviour (first in best dressed)
if the kernel version is pre 2.4.0 and if 2.4.0 or later will put
extended partitions first.
BUGS: I guess the behaviour changed somewhere in the 2.3.x series, so if
they are using a 2.3 series it may behave incorectly. It will be simple
to update it to behave correctly once we know the exact version that
this new behaviour was implemented.
Glenn
Only in boot-floppies.working/utilities/libfdisk: .depend
diff -r -U 3 boot-floppies.orig/utilities/libfdisk/partbl_msdos.c
boot-floppies.working/utilities/libfdisk/partbl_msdos.c
--- boot-floppies.orig/utilities/libfdisk/partbl_msdos.cMon Jan 15 13:43:23
2001
+++ boot-floppies.working/utilities/libfdisk/partbl_msdos.c Mon Jan 15 13:53:53
+2001
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include stdlib.h
#include unistd.h
#include asm/types.h
+#include sys/utsname.h
#include "byteorder.h"
#include "fdisk.h"
@@ -302,12 +303,33 @@
}
#endif
+/* this function taken from busybox/utility.c
+ * Returns kernel version encoded as major*65536 + minor*256 + patch,
+ * so, for example, to check if the kernel is greater than 2.2.11:
+ * if (get_kernel_revision() = 2*65536+2*256+11) { stuff }
+ */
+int get_kernel_revision(void)
+{
+struct utsname name;
+int major = 0, minor = 0, patch = 0;
+
+if (uname(name) == -1) {
+fprintf(stderr, "cannot get system information");
+return (0);
+}
+major = atoi(strtok(name.release, "."));
+minor = atoi(strtok(NULL, "."));
+patch = atoi(strtok(NULL, "."));
+return major * 65536 + minor * 256 + patch;
+}
+
int parse_msdos_partition(char *device, int fd)
{
int i, minor = 1;
struct partition *p;
unsigned char data[512];
-
+int kernel_version = get_kernel_revision();
+
if (!sread( fd, 0, data ))
return -1;
if (*(unsigned short *) (0x1fe + data) != __cpu_to_le16(MSDOS_LABEL_MAGIC))
@@ -322,26 +344,40 @@
if (is_extended_partition(p)) {
extended_partition(device, fd, START_SECT(p), NR_SECTS(p));
}
+ /* if kernel version is less than version 2.4.0 */
+ if (kernel_version (2*65536 + 4*256)) {
+ if (SYS_IND(p) == BSD_PARTITION) {
+bsd_disklabel_partition(device, fd, START_SECT(p));
+}
+/* [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Solaris has a nasty indicator: 0x82
+ * which also means linux swap. For that reason, all
+ * of the prints are done inside the
+ * solaris_x86_partition routine */
+if (SYS_IND(p) == SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION) {
+solaris_x86_partition(device, fd, START_SECT(p));
+}
+ }
}
+
+/* if kernel is 2.4 or better */
+if (kernel_version = (2*65536 + 4*256)) {
#if HAVE_BSD_DISKLABEL | HAVE_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION
-p = (struct partition *) (0x1be + data);
-for (i=1 ; i=4 ; minor++,i++,p++) {
+p = (struct partition *) (0x1be + data);
+for (i=1 ; i=4 ; minor++,i++,p++) {
#if HAVE_BSD_DISKLABEL
- if (SYS_IND(p) == BSD_PARTITION) {
- bsd_disklabel_partition(device, fd, START_SECT(p));
- }
+ if (SYS_IND(p) == BSD_PARTITION) {
+ bsd_disklabel_partition(device, fd, START_SECT(p));
+ }
#endif
#if HAVE_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION
-/* [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Solaris has a nasty indicator: 0x82
- * which also means linux swap. For that reason, all
- * of the prints are done inside the
- * solaris_x86_partition routine */
- if (SYS_IND(p) == SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION) {
- solaris_x86_partition(device, fd, START_SECT(p));
- }
+ if (SYS_IND(p) == SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION) {
+ solaris_x86_partition(device, fd, START_SECT(p));
+ }
#endif
-}
+}
#endif
+}
+
/*
* Check for old-style Disk Manager partition table
*/
Re: Debian bootdisk with Chinese enabled.
adam I am trying the compact one. When the installation goes to the adam step of disk partition(cfdisk) I found there is not a highlight adam on any partition, so we don't know which partition is being treated. adam I don't think this problem is related to Chinese translation but I adam wonder if you have the same problem. adam Yes, this is one of the critical problems which is preventing us from adam using LANG_CHOOSER by default. It's very confusing. I suppose it's adam related to the fact that the LANG_CHOOSER stuff uses it's own fonts, adam and perhaps the highlit version of the character aren't available? I adam really have no idea. Thanks for your reply. As I remember in the page of disk partition(cfdisk) only English letters exist. My question is: does the problem still exist even for English letters from a Chinese font set? Regards, Wen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Boot CVS: peterk
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot Module name:boot-floppies Changes by: peterk 01/01/15 07:21:14 Modified files: utilities/dbootstrap/po: sv.po Log message: Updated Swedish translation -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new demo system -- chrooted!
In reference to a message from Joey Hess, dated Jan 10: Anthony Towns wrote: The debconf frontend should really be passed through to the udeb frontend; the keymap should already have been determined. Right. How we do that with dpkg and random postinst scripts scribbling all over the display, I'm not sure. perhaps you preconfigure everything first (with their debconf protocol output/input just passing through to the cdebconf frontend), then when you actually install the stuff you redirect it to tty3? ok, pardon me for being slow.. just got back from a trip what exactly do you mean by passing the debconf frontend to the udeb frontend? randolph -- Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TauSq.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
