Bug#379521: Install report, focusing on Hebrew l10n issues

2006-07-24 Thread Christian Perrier
 Some installer screens are not translated. But most of them are in
 Hebrew and it works really nicely too!


Actually the translation ratio in D-I is worrying, though:

Charset is UTF-8. Stats: 1350 translated messages, 115 fuzzy translations, 55 
untranslated messages.


This is less than 90% translation ratio. There is *no guarantee* that
we will keep Hebrew in Etch if this is not raised before the release.

 There is a screen to choose locale for Hebrew, It's not translated and I
 think it makes more sense to default to the he_IL.UTF-8 locale all the
 time. There is very little reason to use the default he_IL locale.

I haven't seen any such screen during a default install of a base
system (*not* standard system) performed in Hebrew.

The installed system is localized in Hebrew with he_IL.UTF-8. I even
verified that the root environment is *not* localized in Hebrew, which
is intended because of the rendering problem that could come at the
console.


In short, my own test of an Hebrew install with the daily built
netinst ISO is a complete success.





signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#379502: localechooser fails in lowmem install

2006-07-24 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 severity 379502 serious
 thanks
 
 As lowmem is a valid mode for the installer and even essential on some 
 arches, I'm raising this to RC. Probably nothing really breaks, but it 
 should be trivial to add appropriate tests.

Actually, the only possibility I see is the attached patch:

-test about validlocale
-only run the validlocale and locale generation stuff if it is there

I actually fail to see why validlocale wouldn't be here in lowmem mode
(supposedly we don't install the locale package) but that seems to be
the only short-term solution

This is completely untested.

-- 



--- post-base-installer.old 2006-07-24 06:45:28.206673304 +0200
+++ post-base-installer 2006-07-03 20:56:04.517661171 +0200
@@ -64,33 +64,31 @@
 fi
 
 # If the locale isn't already valid, append it to locale.gen
-if [ -x /target/usr/sbin/validlocale ] ; then 
-   gen=
+gen=
+if log-output -t localechooser --pass-stdout \
+chroot /target/ /usr/sbin/validlocale $LOCALE \
+ /target/etc/locale.gen; then
+   : # Nothing to do
+else
+   # New locale added to locale.gen, generate it
+   gen=1
+fi
+for loc in $EXTRAS; do
+   if [ $loc = $LOCALE ]; then
+   continue
+   fi
if log-output -t localechooser --pass-stdout \
-   chroot /target/ /usr/sbin/validlocale $LOCALE \
+   chroot /target/ /usr/sbin/validlocale $loc \
 /target/etc/locale.gen; then
: # Nothing to do
else
# New locale added to locale.gen, generate it
gen=1
fi
-   for loc in $EXTRAS; do
-   if [ $loc = $LOCALE ]; then
-   continue
-   fi
-   if log-output -t localechooser --pass-stdout \
-   chroot /target/ /usr/sbin/validlocale $loc \
-/target/etc/locale.gen; then
-   : # Nothing to do
-   else
-   # New locale added to locale.gen, generate it
-   gen=1
-   fi
-   done
-   if [ $gen ]; then
-   log-output -t localechooser --pass-stdout \
-   chroot /target /usr/sbin/locale-gen --keep-existing 
/dev/null
-   fi
+done
+if [ $gen ]; then
+   log-output -t localechooser --pass-stdout \
+   chroot /target /usr/sbin/locale-gen --keep-existing /dev/null
 fi
-   
+
 exit 0


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#379502: localechooser fails in lowmem install

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 379502 patch
Bug#379502: localechooser fails in lowmem install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379521: marked as done (Install report, focusing on Hebrew l10n issues)

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:30:01 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#379521: Install report, focusing on Hebrew l10n issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: cdrom in a qemu machine
Image version: Daily build from 2006-07-24
Date: 2006-07-24 00:40 +0100

Machine: qemu from Debian etch 0.8.1-1
Processor: i386
Memory: 128MB
Partitions: not important, I just had a 1GB image and had one partition
and one swap.

Output of lspci and lspci -n:
NA, the network was an rtl8139 emulation in qemu.

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[E]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]

Comments/Problems:

The installer started in text mode and not g-i, I assume it's something
to do with qemu.

Some installer screens are not translated. But most of them are in
Hebrew and it works really nicely too!

There is a screen to choose locale for Hebrew, It's not translated and I
think it makes more sense to default to the he_IL.UTF-8 locale all the
time. There is very little reason to use the default he_IL locale.


It fails to install during mkinitramfs with the error:
Cannot create /target/etc/mkinitramfs/initramfs.conf: Directory nonexistent

The image was downloaded from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
$ md5sum debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
65930682a7d742e485bec89ec4ab8633  debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
The test I did was actually with the last weekly build which fails to
install, so they might not pertain to the latest daily build.

I've started testing the daily build and it has other problems.

This report needs to be closed (doing so now with this mail).

Baruch

Christian Perrier wrote:
 Some installer screens are not translated. But most of them are in
 Hebrew and it works really nicely too!
 
 
 Actually the translation ratio in D-I is worrying, though:
 
 Charset is UTF-8. Stats: 1350 translated messages, 115 fuzzy translations, 55 
 untranslated messages.
 
 
 This is less than 90% translation ratio. There is *no guarantee* that
 we will keep Hebrew in Etch if this is not raised before the release.
 
 There is a screen to choose locale for Hebrew, It's not translated and I
 think it makes more sense to default to the he_IL.UTF-8 locale all the
 time. There is very little reason to use the default he_IL locale.
 
 I haven't seen any such screen during a default install of a base
 system (*not* standard system) performed in Hebrew.
 
 The installed system is localized in Hebrew with he_IL.UTF-8. I even
 verified that the root environment is *not* localized in Hebrew, which
 is intended because of the rendering problem that could come at the
 console.
 
 
 In short, my own test of an Hebrew install with the daily built
 netinst ISO is a complete success.
 
 
 

---End Message---


Processed: Re: Bug#379513: Installation Failure

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 379513 installation-reports
Bug#379513: Installation Failure
Warning: Unknown package 'report'
Bug reassigned from package `installation report' to `installation-reports'.

 --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



D-i Beta or daily build

2006-07-24 Thread Andreas Tille

Hi,

I want to setup a machine from scratch (Compaq Proliant ML530 with
fibre network adapter) and I wonder, whether I should use

  http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/beta1/i386/iso-cd/

which is a little bit old (November 5, 2005) or rather

  http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/current/i386/iso-cd/

which might be broken (in the past I had some problems with
Sarge-daily builds - this might have changed).

Kind regards

 Andreas.

PS: Please CC me, because I'm not subscribed.

--
http://fam-tille.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379502: localechooser fails in lowmem install

2006-07-24 Thread Christian Perrier
tags 379502 patch
thanks

Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 severity 379502 serious
 thanks
 
 As lowmem is a valid mode for the installer and even essential on some 
 arches, I'm raising this to RC. Probably nothing really breaks, but it 
 should be trivial to add appropriate tests.

More complete checking gives the right explanation:

In lowmem mode, the locale is set to C on the installed system.

In localechooser post-base-installer, the locales package is *not*
installed if LOCALE=C.

So, validlocale and locale-gen are not present on the installed
system.

As their only point is to generate the locales, it seems that my
proposed fix is very probably correct.

I'm currently testing it in details.

-- 




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#379521: Install report, focusing on Hebrew l10n issues

2006-07-24 Thread Christian Perrier

 Some installer screens are not translated. But most of them are in
 Hebrew and it works really nicely too!
 
 There is a screen to choose locale for Hebrew, It's not translated and I

When?

During the base system install?

 think it makes more sense to default to the he_IL.UTF-8 locale all the
 time. There is very little reason to use the default he_IL locale.


Actually the Hebrew install should default to he_IL.UTF-8




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#378651: crypto installation report

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 retitle 378651 Manual section 7.2.1 needs update for loop-AES
Bug#378651: crypto installation report
Changed Bug title.

 reassign 378651 installation-guide
Bug#378651: Manual section 7.2.1 needs update for loop-AES
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation-guide'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#378651: crypto installation report

2006-07-24 Thread Max Vozeler
retitle 378651 Manual section 7.2.1 needs update for loop-AES
reassign 378651 installation-guide
thanks

Hi Miroslav,

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:24:57AM +0200, Miroslav Kure wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 02:51:25AM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
  
  3. Documentation: I can confirm that the checkfs-loop script (which
  does the passphrase prompting for loop-AES partitions during
  boot) now shows a full prompt including the mountpoint, format:
  Setting up $loop ($mnt). This is good on the one hand in that
  it works as intended, but means that section 7.2.1. loop-AES of
  the d-i manual is mostly obsolete.
 
 Yes, it is obsolete for loop-AES finally, but we can still reuse it
 for md-crypt section, which has the same problem (except for root
 partition). I have a patch ready, but the freeze of d-i manual got in
 my way, so I'm waiting post beta3.

I'm reassigning this bug to installation-guide to help us not
forget this change. Can you send your patch to the bug, and/or
close it in changelog once you commit? Thanks :-)

cheers,
Max


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: D-i Beta or daily build

2006-07-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 24 July 2006 08:22, you wrote:
 I want to setup a machine from scratch (Compaq Proliant ML530 with
 fibre network adapter) and I wonder, whether I should use
   
 http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/beta1/i386/iso-
cd/

This is VERY old as Beta 2 was released in March, so that would be the 
more logical alternative...

 which is a little bit old (November 5, 2005) or rather
   
 http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/current/i386/is
o-cd/

 which might be broken (in the past I had some problems with
 Sarge-daily builds - this might have changed).

We are currently preparing the Beta 3 release which means that the daily 
builds are relatively stable. However, you should never use the etch_d-i 
images but rather the daily images (daily is currently a symlink to 
sid_d-i). etch_d-i is very likely to be broken whenever we do not have 
the daily symlink pointing at it.

Currently, any of the image available from [1] should be usable, except 
from the weekly snapshots.

Cheers,
FJP

[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/


pgpF1vsvH67BP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: D-I Beta 3 - release planning

2006-07-24 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti

Frans Pop wrote:

snip/

The release preparation page on the wiki [1] is mostly up-to-date with 
regards to issues and TODO items before the release.


snip/

After a week or so of silence on the g-i, a quick note about the status 
of gtkdfb libraries : the most important point is that recently mike 
emmel and claudio ciccani finished implementing the missing parts of 
code for cairo-dfb and gtk-dfb and fixed some irritating issues (i.e. , 
the blue lines issue is gone).
I spent a lot of time during last week in debugging it: some bugs were 
detected and fixed, some are still in the todo list and it would be very 
useful if someone could spend some time in debugging gtkdfb libraries :)


Attilio


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379521: marked as done (Install report, focusing on Hebrew l10n issues)

2006-07-24 Thread Eddy Petrişor

On 24/07/06, Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The installer started in text mode and not g-i, I assume it's something
to do with qemu.

Note that the installer does no0t default yet to GUI, you need to boot
with installgui to start the graphical installer.

--
Regards,
EddyP
=
Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



D-I Beta 3 - release planning

2006-07-24 Thread Frans Pop
(Please reply only to debian-boot; reply-to set accordingly; add other 
recipients only selectively)

Now that linux-2.6.16 has safely landed in testing a few days ago, we can 
really start working on the Beta 3 release of D-I. In fact, the migration 
of most udebs to testing is already in progress.

The release preparation page on the wiki [1] is mostly up-to-date with 
regards to issues and TODO items before the release.
The page also lists the changes implemented since Beta 2 which will be 
used as basis for the release-notes; let me know if you miss items.

One important TODO item is updates to debian-cd, especially for 
architectures that are dropping 2.4 support in d-i. If your architecture 
needs such changes, please contact me. Joey and Steve can probably help 
with the changes where needed.


D-I memory usage

One of the main issues with this release is increased memory usage. For 
some arches this is proving critical as e.g. 32 or 64 MB boundaries are 
crossed. Problems have already been seen on arm and m68k.
When compared with the Sarge release, there are three main causes:
- integration of base-config into first stage (extra udebs use extra
  memory)
- added crypto support in partman (partman-crypto pulls in ~2.5 MB in
  dependencies; new for Beta 3)
  After Beta 3 a change is planned for partman-crypto so it will not pull
  in all its dependencies until it is actually used.
- added languages: the templates.dat file has doubled in size and
  on top of that cdebconf loads the whole file into memory, so the
  increase hits double (blame bubulle and his endless quest for new
  languages to support ;-) This is the main culprit.
  We really need a technical solution to reduce current memory usage and
  the impact of adding translations, but that will probably be post-Etch.

All this does mean that the current lowmem levels need serious review for 
all architectures. The good news is that memory requirement for a bare 
install (lowmem level 2) looks be hardly changed.


Release planning

24Jul  Upload new release of installation-guide
25/26 Jul  Most udebs should have migrated to testing
25-29 Jul  Implement necessary changes in debian-cd
   Other TODO items
26Jul  First build and upload of d-i, check for unexpected build
   errors; fix and reupload where needed
27-30 Jul  Basic testing using daily images
29Jul  Last chance to upload udebs for inclusion in intrds
30Jul  Testbuild of weekly images (using d-i images from unstable)
 1Aug  Final upload of d-i images
 2- 5 Aug  Testing
 2Aug  Last chance to upload udebs not included in initrds
 4- 6 Aug  Preparation of release notes, errata, etc.
 5Aug  Migration of d-i to testing
 6Aug  CD builds
 7Aug  Release

There is some slack in this planning, but not much. Some slippage would 
not be unexpected. A lot depends on the speed with which the BYHAND 
processing of the d-i uploads can take place and whether build errors 
occur.

Porters (and others) are of course requested to test installations and 
note the results in [2].

Cheers,
FJP

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/EtchBeta3Prep
[2] installer/doc/devel/release-checklist


pgpW5RBE736je.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: D-I Beta 3 - release planning (what about powerpc?)

2006-07-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 24 July 2006 12:35, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
 Apropos to G-I, I saw [1] that the powerpc port has it part of the
 builds Partially done. What does this mean?

For the powerpc port we currently build the gtk-miniiso as part of the 
daily builds. I have discussed this with Colin and because of the issues 
with g-i on powerpc we have decided not to add g-i support on other CD 
images:
- powerpc CD images are already very full because of the number of
  subarches (and thus initrd and kernel images)
- it is still unclear which systems and fb devices are really supported
  and which are not; g-i does not yet deal with that very cleanly
- reports about g-i crashes on powerpc (mainly from yourself)

So, consider g-i for powerpc experimental and for those who want to play 
with it or contribute we have the gtk-miniiso.

 And another question, is there _really_ a D-I powerpc porter present?
 AFAIK Colin has retreated prom this position and Geert is still trying
 to accomodate with D-I workflow. Sven hasn't contributed for some time
 now, Wouter is doing only occasional work, so that kind of leaves the
 port with no powerpc porter. Is this the real situation or are my
 impressions wrong?

No, Colin has not retreated from this position. We also have Daniel 
Dickinson helping out for oldworld.
I agree that we still need extra help for powerpc (and I've never said 
differently). However, I am very happy that Holger and Wouter have 
offered their help.


pgppzw1AgnxYT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues

2006-07-24 Thread Baruch Even
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: cdrom in a qemu image
Image version: daily build from 2006-07-23
Date: 2006-07-23 23:30

Machine: qemu i386
Processor: i386
Memory: 128MB
Partitions: NA

Output of lspci and lspci -n: NA

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]

Comments/Problems:

This was all tested on the text install, on qemu it took several hours
for the install to be finished. I'll try the gui installer at another time.

Initial screen of choosing the language says Hebrew, but the word in
Hebrew is reversed, this used to work properly in former versions.
I expected getting IVRIT and got TIRVI, the bidi algorithm wasn't used
maybe?

It's not just the first screen, it's in all screens. The Hebrew wasn't
bidi-fied and looks reversed.

There are various Language Desktop but no Hebrew Desktop, what is done
for them and how I can get Hebrew Desktop there?

Message of x11 upgrade on fresh install??? it also delayed the install
process from continuing until input was received.

GDM login screen is left aligned instead of right aligned.

Gnome desktop is left aligned instead of right aligned, we have user-he
that can take care of that, how do we get it to run on system install of
a bidi system?

Keyboard setup for X11 doesn't include scroll-lock for noticing layout
changes, this was provided in a patch to localization-config.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379502: localechooser fails in lowmem install

2006-07-24 Thread Christian Perrier
 More complete checking gives the right explanation:
 
 In lowmem mode, the locale is set to C on the installed system.
 
 In localechooser post-base-installer, the locales package is *not*
 installed if LOCALE=C.
 
 So, validlocale and locale-gen are not present on the installed
 system.
 
 As their only point is to generate the locales, it seems that my
 proposed fix is very probably correct.
 
 I'm currently testing it in details.


The patch seems to be correct and, with it, the lowmem install works fine.

-- 





Bug#379197: debian-installer: etch d-i mistakenly installed pbuttonsd even though i do not have a mac laptop

2006-07-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Otavio Salvador wrote:
 I did a look on tasksel and it really ask pbbuttonsd to be
 installed. Previously, pbbuttonsd wasn't build to i386 and then this
 wasn't a problem. Now it's.

 Yes, it was originally added because it was only available on powerpc.

 My proposed way to solve it is:
 
  - create a new task called pbbuttonsd-selection;
  - create a new test to return false if /dev/pmu doesn't exist;
  - remove the package from laptop task;

 Hmm, this is getting a bit away from how tasksel is really meant to be
 used. It would be better to add the test to hw-detect and apt-install
 the package on machines that have hardware that support it.

 (Assuming that /dev/pmu is created by udev inside d-i, which I can't
 check.)

I'll try to check if there's a /dev/pmu inside d-i.

-- 
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
-
Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installing Debian unstable to IBM pSeries LPAR - success

2006-07-24 Thread Eddy Petrişor

Please submit an bug against the installation-reports meta package.
(Hint: using reportbug will allow to generate a proper installation
report).

On 24/07/06, AlexB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Good day everyone,

just managed to install Debian unstable to an IBM p570 LPAR. Generally
installation went OK, although Debian installer complained about inability to
finish installation of uw-imapd at the end; also installer complained about
inability to install linux kernel properly, but kernel was installed. Now, after
restart, several small issues have been spotted:

1) eth0 interface was not brought up, seems to be a typo in
/etc/network/interfaces, 'auto eth0' line was missing.

2) no entry for console getty in /etc/inittab - so no way to log in from console
(the console is a terminal connection to virtual seriel port from HMC)

3) no openssh server installed by default - so even if ethernet is brought up,
there is no way to log in to the system after reboot due to point 2). After
openssh server installation - no startup script in /etc/rcS.d, the link has to
be done manually.

The only way to correct was to boot with 'single' kernel parameter and modify
relevant files by hand. After reboot everything seems to be OK.

/etc/issue reads:
Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable \n \l

uname -a reads:
Linux lnxsrv 2.6.15-1-powerpc64 #2 SMP Mon Mar 6 12:50:57 CET 2006 ppc64
GNU/Linux

I used debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso image as of 17/07/2006 and installed
rest of packaged over Internet.

Alex





--
Regards,
EddyP
=
Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Please fix translation errors

2006-07-24 Thread Joey Hess
Frans Pop wrote:
 On Sunday 16 July 2006 15:09, Davide Viti wrote:
  Please spend a few minutes to fix those so that we'll have a (nearly)
  error-free set of translations for next release:)
 
 I'm afraid it is too late for the Beta 3 release as package uploads have 
 already taken place [1,2].

It's still ok to make new uploads to fix actual bugs due to broken
translations. Of course assuming they are fixed in time to fit into the
release timeline.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#379566: (forw) Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues

2006-07-24 Thread Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
reassign 379566 newt
severity 379566 grave
thanks

This is bug in newt, it can be reproduced with attached script (heb.sh).

Latest version of libnewt does not contains code for bidi support, it
can be checked by greppong 'fribidi' on libnewt.

The code is not compiled because it needs symbols like
HAVE_FRIBIDI_FRIBIDI_H defined (see newt.h). Package even have patch
that adds needed chacks to configure.in, but configure is not updated.
So to fix this bug it is needed to run autoconf, as attached patch does.

Severity is set to grave because this bug makes d-i unuseable with some
languages.

24 липня 2006 о 14:14 +0200 Christian Perrier написав(-ла):
 Could you guys have a look at this?
 
 Please followup to bug #379566.
 
 - Forwarded message from Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
 
 Subject: Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues
 Reply-To: Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:29:20 +0100
 From: Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Mailing-List: debian-boot@lists.debian.org archive/latest/104663
 X-CRM114-Status: Good  ( pR: 26.4757 )
 
 Package: installation-reports
 
 Boot method: cdrom in a qemu image
 Image version: daily build from 2006-07-23
 Date: 2006-07-23 23:30
 
 Machine: qemu i386
 Processor: i386
 Memory: 128MB
 Partitions: NA
 
 Output of lspci and lspci -n: NA
 
 Base System Installation Checklist:
 [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
 
 Initial boot worked:[O]
 Configure network HW:   [O]
 Config network: [O]
 Detect CD:  [O]
 Load installer modules: [O]
 Detect hard drives: [O]
 Partition hard drives:  [O]
 Create file systems:[O]
 Mount partitions:   [O]
 Install base system:[O]
 Install boot loader:[O]
 Reboot: [O]
 
 Comments/Problems:
 
 This was all tested on the text install, on qemu it took several hours
 for the install to be finished. I'll try the gui installer at another time.
 
 Initial screen of choosing the language says Hebrew, but the word in
 Hebrew is reversed, this used to work properly in former versions.
 I expected getting IVRIT and got TIRVI, the bidi algorithm wasn't used
 maybe?
 
 It's not just the first screen, it's in all screens. The Hebrew wasn't
 bidi-fied and looks reversed.
 
 There are various Language Desktop but no Hebrew Desktop, what is done
 for them and how I can get Hebrew Desktop there?
 
 Message of x11 upgrade on fresh install??? it also delayed the install
 process from continuing until input was received.
 
 GDM login screen is left aligned instead of right aligned.
 
 Gnome desktop is left aligned instead of right aligned, we have user-he
 that can take care of that, how do we get it to run on system install of
 a bidi system?
 
 Keyboard setup for X11 doesn't include scroll-lock for noticing layout
 changes, this was provided in a patch to localization-config.
 
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 - End forwarded message -
 
 -- 
 
 
 
 

-- 
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov


heb.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
diff -urN newt-0.52.2/debian/control newt.bidi/debian/control
--- newt-0.52.2/debian/control  2006-07-24 16:43:15.0 +0200
+++ newt.bidi/debian/control2006-07-24 16:44:21.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
 Maintainer:  Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 XS-Python-Version: all
-Build-Depends: dbs, sgmltools-lite, libslang2-dev  (=2.0.4-2), libpopt-dev, 
debhelper (=5.0.37.1), gettext, libfribidi-dev, tcl8.4-dev, python (= 
2.3.5-7), python-central (= 0.4.10), python-all-dev
+Build-Depends: dbs, sgmltools-lite, libslang2-dev  (=2.0.4-2), libpopt-dev, 
debhelper (=5.0.37.1), gettext, libfribidi-dev, tcl8.4-dev, python (= 
2.3.5-7), python-central (= 0.4.10), python-all-dev, autoconf
+Build-Conflicts: autoconf2.13
 
 Package: libnewt-dev
 Architecture: any
diff -urN newt-0.52.2/debian/rules newt.bidi/debian/rules
--- newt-0.52.2/debian/rules2006-07-24 16:43:15.0 +0200
+++ newt.bidi/debian/rules  2006-07-24 16:40:23.0 +0200
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
dh_testdir
cp newt.spec $(BUILD_TREE)
rm -f $(BUILD_TREE)/.depend
+   ( cd $(BUILD_TREE)  autoconf --force -i )
( cd $(BUILD_TREE)  ./configure $(GPMSUPPORT) $(NOSTRIP) )
touch $@
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: reassign 379494 to gnome-core

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
 reassign 379494 gnome-core
Bug#379494: add gthumb to the gnome task
Bug reassigned from package `tasksel' to `gnome-core'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Changes in linux-ntfs affecting the name of d-i udeb.

2006-07-24 Thread Joey Hess
David Martínez Moreno wrote:
   Hello, d-i developers.  I have just uploaded linux-ntfs 1.13.1 to 
 unstable, 
 and this affects to you because of:
 
 [...]
  - Removed completely fake ntfstools package, as it was a dummy one in
sarge.  Thanks to Stefan Huehner for noticing (closes: #369106).
  - While at it, renamed ntfstools-udeb to ntfsprogs-udeb for consistency.
Added Provides: ntfstools-udeb, trying to ease transitions.
 [...]
 
   fjp was warned of this thing, and this is only a side note to exercise 
 his 
 memory. :-)  Also, it was not clear if 'Provides: ntfstools-udeb' would be 
 necessary, and Colin suggested me to put it into CONTROL section.

It will be necessary at least until partman-partitioning is updated to
depend on the new package name instead of on ntfstools-udeb as it does now
(on some architectures).

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Boot problem after flasing, led is not green.

2006-07-24 Thread Joey Hess
Jean-Pierre Broeders wrote:
 I have a problem after i flashed for the last time using this manual:
 http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/
 
 After is flashed debian-sda1.bin, I shutdown the power and connect my
 usb harddisk. When I power my nslu2 the only green led (also after some
 couple of hours) i see is the transfer led. The ready/status is orange.
 
 I tried to log in with SSH, but it also doesnt work.
 
 What can be wrong?
 Or am i forgotten something?

An amber status led and green network led is actually normal for a
running nslu2 system with debian on it right now (just checked mine).
We haven't sorted out the necessary stuff to turn the status and disk leds
green.

ssh not working of course indicates a problem. Can you ping the system?

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#379623: Obsolete dependency in testing: partman-base - libparted1.6-udeb

2006-07-24 Thread Héctor Rivas Gándara

Package: partman-base
Version: 78.1

partman-base 78.1 in testing depends on libparted1.6-udeb, but only 
libparted1.7-udeb is avaiable in the debian repository.


So, build the debian-installer is not posible.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reopening 355047

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
 reopen 355047
Bug#355047: install: segmentation faultsts
Bug reopened, originator not changed.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379485: preseed exim4 template for desktop+laptop class to local delivery

2006-07-24 Thread Joey Hess
maximilian attems wrote:
 rationale:
 either webmail or pop3/imap via thunderbird/evolution are the highest
 probable case for laptop+desktop user.
 
 expert user will want anyway better configurability
 of the exim4 configs.
 
 exim4, popularity-contest and xorg warning were the only templates
 that prompted irc.

Preseeding or otherwise avoiding questions is entirely out of scope for
tasksel. The only two possible solutions are:

1. Fix the package to not prompt at high priority if there is a
   reasonable default.
2. Switch to using some other package instead (for example, postfix).

Note that exim4 is not part of either the laptop or desktop task, but
instead is part of the standard system.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#378959: debian-installer: needs option to bypass network config dialog

2006-07-24 Thread Joey Hess
zero79 wrote:
 d-i assumes that the user always wants to bring up a network connection
 during installation.  sometimes this is not desirable; for example 
 when using the rescue mode or when doing a cd or dvd install.
 
 so the problem is that the d-i network config dialog forces the user to 
 select at least one of the network adapters to continue (cancel just 
 brings up the same dialog).  to bypass network config, i have to select 
 one of the network interfaces, then wait for it to not configure.  then 
 i can opt to skip network config.   i suggest that there be a button
 that allows the user to skip the network config from the network 
 interface selection dialog.

Avoiding network configuration is something only an expert should need
or want to do. If you boot the installer in expert mode, you can simply
skip over the network configuration step in the menu; unless you choose
some other later menu item that requires a configured network you can
complete the install without performing the network configuration step.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: severity of 355047 is normal

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
 severity 355047 normal
Bug#355047: install: segmentation faultsts
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379067: marked as done (netinst CD should not be added to sources list of target system)

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:41:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#379067: couple of minor glitches in install 
of powerpc, lspci
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---

Package: installation-reports

Boot method: How did you boot the installer? CD? floppy? network?
booted from daily businesscard CD

Image version: Full URL to image you downloaded is best
| Index of /cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd
|  NameLast  
modified  Size

|
|  Parent  
Directory -
|  MD5SUMS 20-Jul-2006  
02:00  143
|  debian-testing-powerpc-businesscard.iso 20-Jul-2006  
01:58   61M
|  debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso  20-Jul-2006  
02:00  172M


Apache/2.0.53 (Debian GNU/Linux) Server at cdimage.debian.org Port 80
Date: Date and time of the install
July 20, 2006 about 3:00 AM US EastCoast time

Machine: Description of machine (eg, IBM Thinkpad R32)
PowerMac G4

| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
| processor   : 0
| cpu : 7410, altivec supported
| temperature : 39-41 C (uncalibrated)
| clock   : 533MHz
| revision: 0.3 (pvr 800c 1103)
| bogomips: 1060.86
| machine : PowerMac3,4
| motherboard : PowerMac3,4 MacRISC2 MacRISC Power Macintosh
| detected as : 69 (PowerMac G4 Silver)
| pmac flags  : 0010
| L2 cache: 1024K unified
| memory  : 1536MB
| pmac-generation : NewWorld
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

| macswell:~# ( lspci -n ; lspci ) | sort
| :00:0b.0 0600: 106b:002d
| :00:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 1.5 AGP
| :00:10.0 0300: 1002:5046
| :00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage  
128 PF/PRO AGP 4x TMDS

| 0001:10:0b.0 0600: 106b:002e
| 0001:10:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 1.5 PCI
| 0001:10:13.0 0604: 1668:0100 (rev 11)
| 0001:10:13.0 PCI bridge: Actiontec Electronics Inc Mini-PCI bridge  
(rev 11)

| 0001:10:17.0 Class ff00: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo Mac I/O (rev 03)
| 0001:10:17.0 ff00: 106b:0022 (rev 03)
| 0001:10:18.0 0c03: 106b:0019
| 0001:10:18.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo USB
| 0001:10:19.0 0c03: 106b:0019
| 0001:10:19.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo USB
| 0001:11:00.0 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
| 0001:11:00.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
| 0001:11:00.1 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
| 0001:11:00.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
| 0001:11:00.2 0c03: 1033:00e0 (rev 02)
| 0001:11:00.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02)
| 0001:11:01.0 0c00: 11c1:5811 (rev 61)
| 0001:11:01.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Agere Systems FW323 (rev 61)
| 0001:11:02.0 0180: 105a:4d69 (rev 02)
| 0001:11:02.0 Mass storage controller: Promise Technology, Inc.  
20269 (rev 02)

| 0002:21:0b.0 0600: 106b:002f
| 0002:21:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 1.5 Internal  
PCI

| 0002:21:0e.0 0c00: 11c1:5811
| 0002:21:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Agere Systems FW323
| 0002:21:0f.0 0200: 106b:0021 (rev 01)
| 0002:21:0f.0 Ethernet controller: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth GMAC  
(Sun GEM) (rev 01)

| macswell:~#
|
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred
| macswell:~# mac-fdisk -l /dev/hda
| /dev/hda
| #type name length
base ( size )  system
| /dev/hda1 Apple_partition_map Apple63 @  
1( 31.5k)  Partition map
| /dev/hda2 Apple_Bootstrap boot   1954 @  
64   (977.0k)  NewWorld bootblock
| /dev/hda3 Apple_UNIX_SVR2 root   39062500 @  
2018 ( 18.6G)  Linux native
| /dev/hda4 Apple_UNIX_SVR2 swap3330284 @  
77087956 (  1.6G)  Linux swap
| /dev/hda5 Apple_UNIX_SVR2 root060621 18554688 @  
39064518 (  8.8G)  Linux native
| /dev/hda6 Apple_UNIX_SVR2 root20060720   19468750 @  
57619206 (  9.3G)  Linux native

|
| Block size=512, Number of Blocks=80418240
| DeviceType=0x0, DeviceId=0x0
|
| macswell:~#

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [o]
Detect network card:[o]
Configure network:  [o]
Detect CD:  [o]
Load installer modules: [o]
Detect hard drives: [o]

Bug#379566: [MailServer Notification]Attachment Blocking Notification

2006-07-24 Thread scanmail

The heb.sh has been blocked,
and Quarantine entire message has been taken on 7/24/2006 9:32:53 PM.
Message details:
Server:AZINDBAEX01
Sen7/24/20069:32:53 PMQuarantine entire messageheb.shder: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Recipient:[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject:Bug#379566: (forw) Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew 
l10n issues
Attachment name:heb.sh


The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, contains 
confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual 
or entity to whom they are addressed and is subject to legal privilege. If you 
have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by 
reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system 
manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any 
other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those 
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The 
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or 
indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email.

www.aztecsoft.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reassign 379485 to exim4

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
 reassign 379485 exim4
Bug#379485: preseed exim4 template for desktop+laptop class to local delivery
Bug reassigned from package `tasksel' to `exim4'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Floppies for i386

2006-07-24 Thread Joey Hess
Daniel Dickinson wrote:
 I haven't heard in a while about kernel 2.6 floppies for i386, and I
 know there aren't any, so I have a proposal (which I would implement)

Sylvian Ferriol is working on this. I think the status is that
intrgrating it into d-i is still blocked by needing some changes to
klibc, which he uses on the first floppy to load the second floppy
containing d-i.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: D-I Beta 3 - release planning

2006-07-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-24 11:52]:
 One important TODO item is updates to debian-cd, especially for
 architectures that are dropping 2.4 support in d-i. If your
 architecture needs such changes, please contact me. Joey and Steve
 can probably help with the changes where needed.

arm, mips and mipsel need the changed I posted about 2 weeks ago.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Floppy writing script (gui or console) for tools directory

2006-07-24 Thread Joey Hess
Daniel Dickinson wrote:
 The following is a script I wrote that might be useful for the tools
 directory on the cd.  If an image is specified on the command-line this
 script writes it to disk, or, if no image is specified, a file
 selection dialog (gui or console) appears to allow selection of image to
 write.

I think you'd probably do better to send it to the debian-cd mailing
list.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Floppies for i386

2006-07-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 24 July 2006 18:46, Joey Hess wrote:
 Daniel Dickinson wrote:
  I haven't heard in a while about kernel 2.6 floppies for i386, and I
  know there aren't any, so I have a proposal (which I would implement)

 Sylvian Ferriol is working on this. I think the status is that
 intrgrating it into d-i is still blocked by needing some changes to
 klibc, which he uses on the first floppy to load the second floppy
 containing d-i.

Images built by Sylvain are available for testing from:
http://www-timc.imag.fr/Sylvain.Ferriol/debian/d-i/i386/


pgpgJBhM972lK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#379623: marked as done (Obsolete dependency in testing: partman-base - libparted1.6-udeb)

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:43:30 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#379623: Obsolete dependency in testing: partman-base - 
libparted1.6-udeb
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---

Package: partman-base
Version: 78.1

partman-base 78.1 in testing depends on libparted1.6-udeb, but only 
libparted1.7-udeb is avaiable in the debian repository.


So, build the debian-installer is not posible.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 92

Of course this is fixed in unstable.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Processed: tags 379566 d-i

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 379566 + d-i
Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379623: marked as done (Obsolete dependency in testing: partman-base - libparted1.6-udeb)

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:32:45 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#379623: Obsolete dependency in testing: partman-base - 
libparted1.6-udeb
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---

Package: partman-base
Version: 78.1

partman-base 78.1 in testing depends on libparted1.6-udeb, but only 
libparted1.7-udeb is avaiable in the debian repository.


So, build the debian-installer is not posible.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Monday 24 July 2006 17:37, Héctor Rivas Gándara wrote:
 partman-base 78.1 in testing depends on libparted1.6-udeb, but only
 libparted1.7-udeb is avaiable in the debian repository.

This is a temporary error due to the fact that we are currently migrating 
udebs to testing in preparation for the Beta 3 release.
Unfortunately I overlooked the fact that the last upload partman-base had 
not yet been installed on all architectures. Should be fixed within a few 
days.

Sorry for the inconvenience, but expect testing to be in flux for the next 
week in general with regard to the installer.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpgiGp3lvVB2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
---End Message---


Processed: Re: (forw) Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 379566 newt
Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `newt'.

 severity 379566 grave
Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Boot problem after flasing, led is not green.

2006-07-24 Thread Eddy Petrişor

On 24/07/06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jean-Pierre Broeders wrote:
 I have a problem after i flashed for the last time using this manual:
 http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/

 After is flashed debian-sda1.bin, I shutdown the power and connect my
 usb harddisk. When I power my nslu2 the only green led (also after some
 couple of hours) i see is the transfer led. The ready/status is orange.

 I tried to log in with SSH, but it also doesnt work.

 What can be wrong?
 Or am i forgotten something?

An amber status led and green network led is actually normal for a
running nslu2 system with debian on it right now (just checked mine).
We haven't sorted out the necessary stuff to turn the status and disk leds
green.

ssh not working of course indicates a problem. Can you ping the system?


I have encountered a similar problem about a half year ago, talked
with Martin Michmayr about it, but we couldn't spot the reason why
this happens. I eneded up using debian armeb unofficial port, but
solving this issue would be a real plus.

Note: I find it very useful that the status led blinks when the NSLU
is powered and running in debian armeb since I have experience seldom
blockage of the router and at those times the blinking stops and is
easy to spot. Still I am not sure if this is a side effect or the
intended behaviour, but is nice.

--
Regards,
EddyP
=
Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379637: Package: installation-reports

2006-07-24 Thread Miles Fidelman

Package: installation-reports

Boot method: netinstall CD
Image version:
3.1r2, downloaded July 2006 (not sure of the exact date)
downloaded from 
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r2/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r2-i386-netinst.iso



Date: 7/20-24/06

Machine: Supermicro P8SCT 1U rack-mount server
Processor: P4 processor 640 3.2GHZ 2MB CACHE L775 CPU (i686 architecture)
Memory: 4G (3G usable, the other 1G overlaps system resources)
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred

server1:~# fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sda: 400.0 GB, 400088457216 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 48641 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *   1 122  979933+  fd  Linux raid 
autodetect

/dev/sda2 123 450 2634660   82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda3 451   1260897659135   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect

/dev/sda4   12609   36923   195310237+   5  Extended
/dev/sda5   12609   36923   195310206   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect


Disk /dev/sdb: 400.0 GB, 400088457216 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 48641 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1   *   1 122  979933+  fd  Linux raid 
autodetect
/dev/sdb2 123 450 2634660   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect
/dev/sdb3 451   1260897659135   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect

/dev/sdb4   12609   36923   195310237+   5  Extended
/dev/sdb5   12609   36923   195310206   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect


Disk /dev/sdc: 400.0 GB, 400088457216 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 48641 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdc1   *   1 122  979933+  fd  Linux raid 
autodetect

/dev/sdc2 123 450 2634660   82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sdc3 451   1260897659135   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect

/dev/sdc4   12609   36923   195310237+   5  Extended
/dev/sdc5   12609   36923   195310206   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect


Disk /dev/sdd: 400.0 GB, 400088457216 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 48641 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdd1   *   1 122  979933+  fd  Linux raid 
autodetect
/dev/sdd2 123 450 2634660   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect
/dev/sdd3 451   1260897659135   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect

/dev/sdd4   12609   36923   195310237+   5  Extended
/dev/sdd5   12609   36923   195310206   fd  Linux raid 
autodetect


raid set up as follows:
md3 : active raid1 sdb5[0] sdc5[2] sdd5[1]
  195310080 blocks [2/2] [UU]

md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[2] sdc1[1]
  979840 blocks [2/2] [UU]

md2 : active raid1 sdb3[2] sda3[0] sdc3[1]
  97659008 blocks [2/2] [UU]

md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[2] sdc2[1]
  2634560 blocks [2/2] [UU]

/dev/md0 mounted as /boot (ext3)
/dev/md1 allocated for swap
/dev/md2 allocated as LVM pv /dev/rootvolume
/dev/md3 allocated as LVM pv /dev/backupvolume

/dev/mapper/rootvolume-rootlv on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
/dev/mapper/backupvolume-backuplv on /backup type ext3 (rw)

Output of lspci and lspci -n:

server1:/etc# lspci
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. Server Memory Controller Hub (rev 05)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. Server Memory Controller Hub PCI 
Express Port (rev 05)
:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. Graphics Controller 
(rev 05)
:00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) 
PCI Express Port 1 (rev 03)
:00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) 
PCI Express Port 2 (rev 03)
:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 
Family) USB UHCI #1 (rev 03)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 
Family) USB UHCI #2 (rev 03)
:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 
Family) USB UHCI #3 (rev 03)
:00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 
Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 03)
:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 
Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 03)

:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev d3)
:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FR (ICH6/ICH6R) LPC 
Interface Bridge (rev 03)
:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 
Family) IDE Controller (rev 03)
:00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801FR/FRW (ICH6R/ICH6RW) SATA 
Controller (rev 03)
:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) 
SMBus Controller (rev 03)

:01:00.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. PCI Bridge Hub (rev 09)

Bug#378521: marked as done (installation-report: installed system is not working)

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:08:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#378521: installation-report: installed 
system is not working
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.14
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: cd
Image version: netinstall i386
Date: 2006-07-17

Machine: Asus A8V-E
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O ]
Detect network card:[O ]
Configure network:  [E ]
Detect CD:  [O ]
Load installer modules: [O ]
Detect hard drives: [O ]
Partition hard drives:  [O ]
Create file systems:[O ]
Mount partitions:   [O ]
Install base system:[O ]
Install boot loader:[O ]
Installed system ok:[E ]

Comments/Problems:

During installation a driver for the ethernet, called sky2, is used.
After installation this driver is not longer present.

-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer
DISTRIB_RELEASE=3.1 (installer build 20060529)

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==

lspci is not installed

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Fixed.. 2.6.16 is in testing now.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter

2006-07-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 24 July 2006 07:17, Rick Thomas wrote:
 During the install process, I selected the C locale early on.
 Later, when asked, I indicated I have a US-English keyboard.  I also
 specified US-EastCoast timezone, and in general did everything I
 could to indicate my location in the USA.  However, when the
 installation was complete, I noticed that the file /etc/papersize had
 a4 in it (the hard way -- by printing a long document on letter-
 format paper!)

For the Sarge version of the installer this was done by the package 
localization-config (though probably not for en_US as it was disabled for 
en_* locales).

However, because of the integration of base-config into the 1st stage of 
the installation, the old localization-config is no longer usable. A 
rewrite has been delayed because of personal circumstances for the 
maintainer, but it should be available again before Etch release and the 
plan is to also support en_US.


pgpEKur8XVxKo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#378959: debian-installer: needs option to bypass network config dialog

2006-07-24 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:35:08AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 zero79 wrote:
  d-i assumes that the user always wants to bring up a network connection
  during installation.  sometimes this is not desirable; for example 
  when using the rescue mode or when doing a cd or dvd install.
  
  so the problem is that the d-i network config dialog forces the user to 
  select at least one of the network adapters to continue (cancel just 
  brings up the same dialog).  to bypass network config, i have to select 
  one of the network interfaces, then wait for it to not configure.  then 
  i can opt to skip network config.   i suggest that there be a button
  that allows the user to skip the network config from the network 
  interface selection dialog.
 
 Avoiding network configuration is something only an expert should need
 or want to do.

I disagree. It makes setting up computers for which there is no network
connection or for which d-i cannot handle the network setup, needlessly
hard.

I can name a few people who have a (as in, one) computer, but no
Internet connection; there is also the case of some DSL authentication
and/or network protocols that d-i cannot currently handle. Not only
experts will hit this type of thing, and a CD-based install should Just
Work there, without trying to reach the network if that is not required.

-- 
Fun will now commence
  -- Seven Of Nine, Ashes to Ashes, stardate 53679.4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter

2006-07-24 Thread Rick Thomas


On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:58 PM, Frans Pop wrote:


On Monday 24 July 2006 07:17, Rick Thomas wrote:

During the install process, I selected the C locale early on.
Later, when asked, I indicated I have a US-English keyboard.  I also
specified US-EastCoast timezone, and in general did everything I
could to indicate my location in the USA.  However, when the
installation was complete, I noticed that the file /etc/papersize had
a4 in it (the hard way -- by printing a long document on letter-
format paper!)


For the Sarge version of the installer this was done by the package
localization-config (though probably not for en_US as it was  
disabled for

en_* locales).

However, because of the integration of base-config into the 1st  
stage of

the installation, the old localization-config is no longer usable. A
rewrite has been delayed because of personal circumstances for the
maintainer, but it should be available again before Etch release  
and the

plan is to also support en_US.


I assume this means that if I do whatever magic is required to get  
en_US locale, then I'll get letter in /etc/papersize.  What if I  
choose C locale?


Hopefully,
Rick


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Please fix translation errors

2006-07-24 Thread zino
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:08:59AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 Frans Pop wrote:
  On Sunday 16 July 2006 15:09, Davide Viti wrote:
   Please spend a few minutes to fix those so that we'll have a (nearly)
   error-free set of translations for next release:)
  
  I'm afraid it is too late for the Beta 3 release as package uploads have 
  already taken place [1,2].
 
 It's still ok to make new uploads to fix actual bugs due to broken
 translations. Of course assuming they are fixed in time to fit into the
 release timeline.

In case anyone wanted to fix the translations for level1, here's today situation

 +--+--+--+
 | Language | SV   | LS   |
 +--+--+--+
 | bn   | 0| 1|
 | fa   | 4| 7|
 | he   | 0| 31   |
 | hr   | 3| 0|
 | ka   | 0| 2|
 | kk   | 1| 3|
 | km   | 1| 1|
 | ku   | 1| 1|
 | lv   | 2| 0|
 | ne   | 3| 1|
 | pa   | 2| 0|
 | se   | 4| 0|
 | wo   | 1| 1|
 +--+--+--+
 | TOTAL| 22   | 48   |
 +--+--+--+

LEGENDA:
SV - Suspect variable(s)
LS - Level specific error(s)
refer to http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/spellcheck/level1/index.html


A few notes:

bn - the error can be ignored since the 65 chars limit does not apply for 
languages supported by g-i only

he - there's a multiselect string with the wrong nr of parameters: d-i/g-i will 
crash when trying to display it
 so please fix at least that error


there might be some false positive: sorry for that.

regards,
Davide


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter

2006-07-24 Thread Christian Perrier
 plan is to also support en_US.
 
 I assume this means that if I do whatever magic is required to get  
 en_US locale, then I'll get letter in /etc/papersize.  What if I  
 choose C locale?


This should be discussed with the localization-config maintainer but
that would require extra code in localization-config to not only take
the locale into account but also the chosen country.

However my personal feeling about this is that locales are eaxctly
meant for that purpose: set parameters that depend on language AND
country.

So, if you actually want a paper size adapted to your country, I'd
recommend to set the locale properly.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter

2006-07-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 24 July 2006 20:16, you wrote:
 I assume this means that if I do whatever magic is required to get
 en_US locale, then I'll get letter in /etc/papersize.  What if I
 choose C locale?

For C locale, localization-config is not run (which IMO makes sense) and 
you get the _package_ default (which also makes sense).


pgpwmaLT0S8kt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Apenas um erro

2006-07-24 Thread Raul Gomes








Boa Tarde 



Eu tive instalando o ultimo debian 3.1 r2 e reparei que
quando colocando para instalar com o kernel 2.6.8

O sistema gráfico da pani, não abre de jeito nenhum, já olhei
vários artigos mas não encontrei nada falando sobre

Esse pequeno bugs, bom se tiverem uma resposta poderiam me
passar ?



Grato



Raul Gomes








Processing of user-setup_1.4_i386.changes

2006-07-24 Thread Archive Administrator
user-setup_1.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  user-setup_1.4.dsc
  user-setup_1.4.tar.gz
  user-setup-udeb_1.4_all.udeb
  user-setup_1.4_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of localechooser_1.21_i386.changes

2006-07-24 Thread Archive Administrator
localechooser_1.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  localechooser_1.21.dsc
  localechooser_1.21.tar.gz
  localechooser_1.21_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter

2006-07-24 Thread Helmut Wollmersdorfer

Christian Perrier wrote:


So, if you actually want a paper size adapted to your country, I'd
recommend to set the locale properly.


ACK.
This can be a nice _default_.

But keep in mind that the papersize depends only on the piece of paper 
which I put into (one of) my printer(s).


Helmut Wollmersdorfer


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#378959: debian-installer: needs option to bypass network config dialog

2006-07-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 24 July 2006 19:36, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
 I can name a few people who have a (as in, one) computer, but no
 Internet connection; there is also the case of some DSL authentication
 and/or network protocols that d-i cannot currently handle. Not only
 experts will hit this type of thing, and a CD-based install should Just
 Work there, without trying to reach the network if that is not
 required.

This was an issue with Beta2 but is very much possible again with Beta3.
The installer _will_ by default ask you to configure a network interface 
if it finds one, but you can decline to do so and do an install without 
any network connection.


pgpqQFGkX1cY3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Apenas um erro

2006-07-24 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Olá Raul,

debian-boot é uma lista em inglês. Eu vou traduzir seu e-mail,
em mensagens futuras, envie as mensagens já traduzidas ou contate a
debian-l10n-portuguese@lists.debian.org para que seja possível ajudá-lo.
Para dúvidas técnicas, use a debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org

debian-boot, I just explaing to Raul what debian-boot is about, and
here goes the translation (I also point him to the debian-user-portuguese,
I think is the right thing to do).

On 07/24/2006 05:16 PM, Raul Gomes wrote:
 Boa Tarde
Good afternoon


 Eu tive instalando o ultimo debian 3.1 r2 e reparei que quando colocando
 para instalar com o kernel 2.6.8
 O sistema gráfico da pani, não abre de jeito nenhum, já olhei vários
 artigos mas não encontrei nada falando sobre

I had been installing the last debian 3.1 r2 and noticed that when I choose
to install kernel 2.6.8
The graphical system doesn't work, in no way it opens, I took a look
in various articles but didn't find anything speaking about it.


 Esse pequeno bugs, bom se tiverem uma resposta poderiam me passar ?

This little bug, well, if you have an answer could you forward it to me?


 Grato
 Raul Gomes
Thanks.


Sorry, the original text is a little bit fuzzy. :-(

Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFExTtxCjAO0JDlykYRAuY/AJ9yvynD+qvAuNFI5VDdnNSta1PYDQCfQ9e6
lkzPmb8EYPfuazl5KvTzeY0=
=eLIb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



user-setup_1.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.4_all.udeb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.4_all.udeb
user-setup_1.4.dsc
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.4.dsc
user-setup_1.4.tar.gz
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.4.tar.gz
user-setup_1.4_all.deb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.4_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



localechooser_1.21_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
localechooser_1.21.dsc
  to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.21.dsc
localechooser_1.21.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.21.tar.gz
localechooser_1.21_all.udeb
  to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.21_all.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 379502 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379067: closed by Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Processed: Re: Bug#379067: couple of minor glitches in install of powerpc, lspci)

2006-07-24 Thread Rick Thomas


On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:


This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#379067: netinst CD should not be added to sources list of target  
system,

which was filed against the apt-setup package.

It has been closed by Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] by replying
to this email.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: July 24, 2006 11:41:36 AM EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#379067: couple of minor glitches in  
install of powerpc, lspci



lspci is present in current daily builds. Closing this bug.

--
see shy jo


Well actually, it's a bit more complicated than that. As noted  
elsewhere, lspci is pulled in by the Desktop task.  It's not  
present in the bare-bones (Desktop un-checked) install (as one  
might want to use for a simple server -- a case where you might  
actually want lspci and friends to be present...)


So to put the problem as simply as possible:

The command lspci is present during the installation.  But after  
the reboot, whether lspci is present or absent depends on whether the  
user left the Desktop environment checked when the installer was  
running tasksel.  If it was checked, then lspci will be present in  
the installed system after the reboot.  If it was not checked, then  
lspci will be absent after the reboot.


It seems to me that lspci is such a basic tool that it ought to be  
present in the bare-bones system, not dragged in as an afterthought  
by the Desktop task.


As I understand it (Debian bug processing is still a bit of a mystery  
to me...) the above is what bug#379120 is all about -- so closing  
379067 (which is about whether or not to put a deb cdrom into the  
installed sources.list file when installing from a netinst CD, but  
also mentions the lspci question in passing) is correct, but this is  
not the correct reason.


Enjoy!

Rick




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#378123: Probably fixed now

2006-07-24 Thread Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
Hi,

I think this [1] bug was the problem. And it seems to be fixed now.
So, unless yaboot 1.3.13-7 does not make it to etch, I guess this bug
report can be closed.

Regards,

Alberto

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378123

-- 
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta| Formación, consultoría y soporte técnico
agi@(inittab.org|debian.org)| en GNU/Linux y software libre
Encrypted mail preferred| http://inittab.com

Key fingerprint = 9782 04E7 2B75 405C F5E9  0C81 C514 AF8E 4BA4 01C3



Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter

2006-07-24 Thread Rick Thomas


On Jul 24, 2006, at 4:14 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:


plan is to also support en_US.


I assume this means that if I do whatever magic is required to get
en_US locale, then I'll get letter in /etc/papersize.  What if I
choose C locale?



This should be discussed with the localization-config maintainer but
that would require extra code in localization-config to not only take
the locale into account but also the chosen country.

However my personal feeling about this is that locales are exactly
meant for that purpose: set parameters that depend on language AND
country.

So, if you actually want a paper size adapted to your country, I'd
recommend to set the locale properly.


Far be it from me to make extra work for the localization-config  
maintainer.  And I agree with you that locales are exactly for the  
purpose of setting things that depend on country and language.  I  
guess my problem is that (for the intended application of this  
system) I want a locale that says language is C and country is  
US -- but there is no such locale.



Rick

-- If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride!
-- anonymous English proverb

-- If a frog had wings, he'd have a long tail, 'cause he wouldn't rub  
it off bumping his backside on the ground all the time!

-- me


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379637: Package: installation-reports

2006-07-24 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 12:34:58PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
 Package: installation-reports
 http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r2/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r2-i386-netinst.iso
   snip/ 
 Disk /dev/sda: 400.0 GB, 400088457216 bytes
 
 Disk /dev/sdb: 400.0 GB, 400088457216 bytes
 
 Disk /dev/sdc: 400.0 GB, 400088457216 bytes
 
 Disk /dev/sdd: 400.0 GB, 400088457216 bytes
 
 raid set up as follows:
 md3 : active raid1 sdb5[0] sdc5[2] sdd5[1]
   195310080 blocks [2/2] [UU]
 
 md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[2] sdc1[1]
   979840 blocks [2/2] [UU]
 
 md2 : active raid1 sdb3[2] sda3[0] sdc3[1]
   97659008 blocks [2/2] [UU]
 
 md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[2] sdc2[1]
   2634560 blocks [2/2] [UU]
 
 /dev/md0 mounted as /boot (ext3)
 /dev/md1 allocated for swap
 /dev/md2 allocated as LVM pv /dev/rootvolume
 /dev/md3 allocated as LVM pv /dev/backupvolume
 
 Output of lspci and lspci -n:
 
 server1:/etc# lspci
  snip/ 
 server1:/etc# lspci -n
  snip/ 
 Base System Installation Checklist:
 [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
 
 Initial boot worked:[O]
 Configure network HW:   [O]
 Config network: [O]
 Detect CD:  [O]
 Load installer modules: [O]
 Detect hard drives: [E]
 Partition hard drives:  [E]
 Create file systems:[O]
 Mount partitions:   [O]
 Install base system:[E]
 Install boot loader:[E]
 Reboot: [E]
 
 Comments/Problems:
 
 Detect Hard Drives:
 - default kernel (2.4) couldn't detect drives
 - needed to run linux26/expert26 to detect SATA drives - then worked ok

Nice.

 - could use a little better documentation

Which documentation did you use? (Which documentation should be improved?)

 Partition Hard Drives:
 - this was VERY time consuming and error prone
 - I was using the combination of md and lvm, which is very poorly 
 documented, and doesn't work completely (at least for sarge)

Oh, now I see the 3.1 that was told before.
That I explains the default of a 2.4 kernel.


 - things I discovered along the way:
  after specifying a RAID set, things work badly unless you wait for 
 the disks to sync (alt-f2, watch and wait, for each raid set - wait a long 
 time)

You where waiting for about 800 GIGA Byte to be transferred,
that does take time.

  after creating raids and trying to write them, I got errors along 
 the lines of note: unable to re-read the partition table, you should 
 reboot - turns out that it's ok to ignore these, but you have to go 
 into and out of the partition editor a couple of times to move on to the 
 next step of configuring LVM
  create file systems worked after figuring out the md and lvm setups
 - the documentation needs a lot of work for this. some suggestions:
 
 -- sections 6.3.2.2 and .3 should be reversed (setting up RAIDs needs to 
 happen before setting up logical volumes!)
 -- need a lot more discussion about complex setups (lvm over raid, and 
 so forth) - I found 
 http://www.planamente.ch/emidio/pages/linux_howto_root_lvm_raid.php
 to be the best resource - suggest either adding a link, or incorporating 
 text from it

Acknowledge.

 Install boot loader and reboot:
 - neither lilo nor grub set up properly after the disk partioning
 - got errors about not being able to install (tried a lot of different 
 locations)
 - had to use the install disk as a rescue disk to boot and figure out 
 the proper paths to the kernel and initrd
 - it seemed to get grub into the MBR on one hard drive, so I was able to 
 reboot - which got me into grub
 - manually booted via grub
 - manually installed grub into MBRs of other disks
 - had to set up menu.lst manually
 - then everything pretty much worked

I read that the LVM  RAID stuff wanted more attention then expected.
Reading the changelog of 

 A few more nits that I had to clean up manually:
 
 - the -386 kernel only recognized 1G of 3G: I had to install a -686 
 version of the kernel and reboot to see all my memory (might want to add 
 more kernel choices to the installer and/or put some notes in sec. 3.6.4 
 of the installation manual regarding what to do if you don't see all 
 your memory - all that's mentioned now is to try using the mem= kernel 
 option, which doesn't help)

The netinst CD has only one kernel, a i386 that (tries to) fits all.
Other install methods present more kernels. There is -686 available.

 - the installer did not quite get swapping or the fstab right, I had to
  mkswap/dev/md1
  swapon
 
 and add the following to fstab:
 /dev/md0/boot   ext3defaults0   0
 /dev/md1noneswapsw  0   0

I think it doesn't make sense to swap to a RAID device.

 and there seems to be some kind of subtle bug or interactions in the 
 raid code:
 
 I have spare devices configured for each raid, but they didn't show up 
 on initial boot.  As best as I can reconstruct from the boot logs:
 
 /dev/md0 - which mounts as boot, tried to bind 

Bug#379688: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-07-24 Thread facundo
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: cd / network
Image version: 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 07/23/2006 20:00

Machine: Clone PC
Processor: Pentium IV 2.4 ghz
Memory: 1024 mb
Partitions: 

S.ficherosTipo Bloques de 1K   UsadoDispon Uso% Montado en
/dev/sda1  xfs20504704   2252840  18251864  11% /
tmpfstmpfs  517952 0517952   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda6  xfs53036748  8572  53028176   1% /data
/dev/sda3  xfs 4873504530328   4343176  11% /home
tmpfstmpfs   10240   112 10128   2% /dev
/dev/hda   iso9660  649458649458 0 100% /media/cdrom0

Output of lspci and lspci -n:

00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 661FX/M661FX/M661MX Host 
(rev 11)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS AGP Port (virtual 
PCI-to-PCI bridge)
00:02.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS964 [MuTIOL Media IO] 
(rev 36)
00:02.5 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] (rev 01)
00:02.7 Multimedia audio controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] AC'97 
Sound Controller (rev a0)
00:03.0 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller 
(rev 0f)
00:03.1 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller 
(rev 0f)
00:03.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller 
(rev 0f)
00:03.3 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 2.0 Controller
00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900 PCI Fast 
Ethernet (rev 90)
00:05.0 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SATA (rev 01)
00:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Zoran Corporation ZR36057PQC Video cutting 
chipset (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV5M64 [RIVA TNT2 Model 
64/Model 64 Pro] (rev 15)

00:00.0 0600: 1039:0661 (rev 11)
00:01.0 0604: 1039:0003
00:02.0 0601: 1039:0964 (rev 36)
00:02.5 0101: 1039:5513 (rev 01)
00:02.7 0401: 1039:7012 (rev a0)
00:03.0 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
00:03.1 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
00:03.2 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 0f)
00:03.3 0c03: 1039:7002
00:04.0 0200: 1039:0900 (rev 90)
00:05.0 0101: 1039:0181 (rev 01)
00:08.0 0400: 11de:6057 (rev 02)
01:00.0 0300: 10de:002d (rev 15)

Base System Installation Checklist:

[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [E] 

Comments/Problems:

a) did not reboot, but switching off and then on it all started ok
b) did not configure correctly xorg.  needed to run dpkg-reconfigure 
xserver-xorg and after selected nv as video card I've to manually change 
xorg.conf file section display ( it was “nvidia” but it worked with “nv” )
c) lilo does not installs at all if you try to put it on a separate /boot 
partition ( xfs ) 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter

2006-07-24 Thread Christian Perrier

 Far be it from me to make extra work for the localization-config  
 maintainer.  And I agree with you that locales are exactly for the  
 purpose of setting things that depend on country and language.  I  
 guess my problem is that (for the intended application of this  
 system) I want a locale that says language is C and country is  
 US -- but there is no such locale.


en_US seems to be the closest approximation...

Apart from the extra cruft bringed by the locales packages you would
get by choosing English then United States, I actually would recommend
setting the locale to en_US if you want some correct
internationalization.



I actually recommend closing this bug report.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#378123: marked as done (Should check that file system holding /boot is supported (partman hook))

2006-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:29:35 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#378123: Probably fixed now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important


Hi,

I tried debian-installer on an iBook G4 with the 20060711 image (IIRC),
and after the install the system didn't boot. The kernel panics (it will
fail uncompressing the initrd). Seems to be a problem with the initrd
living in an XFS partition. Making a ext3 partition for /boot fixed it.

The problem is reported in Ubuntu:
https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=14485

Since I don't expect the fix to be easy, some kind of warning would be
nice, to avoid making users go crazy with this.

Thanks,

Alberto


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-rc1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Quoting Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 Hi,
 
 I think this [1] bug was the problem. And it seems to be fixed now.
 So, unless yaboot 1.3.13-7 does not make it to etch, I guess this bug
 report can be closed.


Well, then doing so (blindly, I must admit, I have no way to check).




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter

2006-07-24 Thread Rick Thomas
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 06:36 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
  Far be it from me to make extra work for the localization-config  
  maintainer.  And I agree with you that locales are exactly for the  
  purpose of setting things that depend on country and language.  I  
  guess my problem is that (for the intended application of this  
  system) I want a locale that says language is C and country is  
  US -- but there is no such locale.
 
 
 en_US seems to be the closest approximation...
 
 Apart from the extra cruft bringed by the locales packages you would
 get by choosing English then United States, I actually would recommend
 setting the locale to en_US if you want some correct
 internationalization.
 
 
 
 I actually recommend closing this bug report.

Do what you want, but keep in mind that en_US, and every other natural
language locale except C, messes with the sort collating order to
satisfy some librarian's idea of 'niceness'.   It robs me of the
simplicy and reliability of the natural collating order that I get
from plain old 8-bit ASCII characters.

Oh well... It's just one more thing to go on my list of stuff I have to
fix after the Debian installer gets done.

Sigh,

Rick



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter

2006-07-24 Thread Christian Perrier
 Do what you want, but keep in mind that en_US, and every other natural
 language locale except C, messes with the sort collating order to
 satisfy some librarian's idea of 'niceness'.   It robs me of the

I would rather say that the English locales cope with the accepted
collation order of the English language, actually ISO/IEC 14651

I usually carefully avoid pretending I have better knowledge than
people working on ISO standards so I would say that it does not seem
to fit your personal preferencesbut when it comes at the English
language, the standard is very probably the one which is right.


 simplicy and reliability of the natural collating order that I get
 from plain old 8-bit ASCII characters.
 
 Oh well... It's just one more thing to go on my list of stuff I have to
 fix after the Debian installer gets done.


Seems that the way to fix this is by reporting a bug against the
locales package to fix the English locales...:-).




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature