Processed: raise remaining usrmerge normal bugs to important
054191 1055514: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055514 1061238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061238 1061245: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061245 1061248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061248 1061259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061259 1061332: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061332 1061337: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061337 1061342: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061342 1061352: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061352 1061353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061353 1061489: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061489 1061491: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061491 1061527: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061527 1061702: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061702 1061849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061849 1061851: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061851 1061855: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061855 1061865: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061865 1063455: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063455 1063458: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063458 1063552: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063552 1063571: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063571 1063572: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063572 1063620: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063620 1063622: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063622 1063692: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063692 1063693: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063693 1063694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063694 1063696: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063696 1063699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063699 1063876: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063876 1063878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063878 1064045: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064045 1064046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064046 1064125: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064125 1064126: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064126 1064237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064237 1064238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064238 1064299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064299 1064315: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064315 1064316: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064316 1064396: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064396 1064400: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064400 1064408: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064408 1064430: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064430 1064449: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064449 1064459: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064459 1064887: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064887 1064888: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064888 1071119: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071119 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: more usrmerge bugs to important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1063693 important Bug #1063693 [src:xdm] xdm: move systemd unit to /usr (DEP17) Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1063572 important Bug #1063572 [jfsutils] jfsutils: move files to /usr (DEP17) Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1051460 important Bug #1051460 [src:crowdsec-custom-bouncer] crowdsec-custom-bouncer: move systemd units to /usr Severity set to 'important' from 'wishlist' > severity 1054013 important Bug #1054013 [src:dnssec-trigger] dnssec-trigger: defer location of systemd units to systemd.pc Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1054084 important Bug #1054084 [src:crowdsec] let dh_installsystemd choose the location of systemd units Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1054086 important Bug #1054086 [src:lsm] lsm: let dh_installsystemd choose the location of units Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1054088 important Bug #1054088 [src:sanoid] sanoid: let dh_installsystemd choose the location of units Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1054089 important Bug #1054089 [src:php-defaults] php-common: let dh_installsystemd choose the location of units Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1054090 important Bug #1054090 [src:zram-tools] zram-tools: let dh_installsystemd choose the location of the unit Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1054093 important Bug #1054093 [src:monit] monit: let dh_installsystemd choose the location of units Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1054191 important Bug #1054191 [src:memlockd] memlockd: installs an empty /lib/systemd/system once dh_installsystemd installs to /usr Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1064449 important Bug #1064449 [open-infrastructure-system-build] open-infrastructure-system-build: ineffective diversions due to /usr-move (DEP17) Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1063455 important Bug #1063455 [open-infrastructure-compute-tools] open-infrastructure-compute-tools: move files to /usr for DEP17 Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1063458 important Bug #1063458 [open-infrastructure-storage-tools] open-infrastructure-storage-tools: move files to /usr for DEP17 Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1067817 important Bug #1067817 [libfuse2t64] libfuse2: move library to /usr (DEP17 P1) Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 1067817 to the same value. > severity 1063878 important Bug #1063878 [di-utils] di-utils: chroot-setup.sh creates ineffective diversions (DEP17) Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1064408 important Bug #1064408 [live-build] [PATCH] duplicate aliased diversions for DEP17 Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1051460: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051460 1054013: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054013 1054084: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054084 1054086: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054086 1054088: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054088 1054089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054089 1054090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054090 1054093: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054093 1054191: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054191 1063455: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063455 1063458: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063458 1063572: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063572 1063693: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063693 1063878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063878 1064408: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064408 1064449: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064449 1067817: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067817 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1072092: piuparts: switch default tmpdir to /var/tmp/
Processing control commands: > affects -1 - piuparts debos vmdb2 Bug #1072092 [debootstrap] piuparts: switch default tmpdir to /var/tmp/ Removed indication that 1072092 affects piuparts, debos, and vmdb2 > reassign -1 piuparts Bug #1072092 [debootstrap] piuparts: switch default tmpdir to /var/tmp/ Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'piuparts'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1072092 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1072092 to the same values previously set -- 1072092: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072092 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1064005: marked as done (netcfg: "get_netmask string 255.255.255.255" not working)
Your message dated Tue, 28 May 2024 21:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064005: fixed in netcfg 1.187+deb12u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064005, regarding netcfg: "get_netmask string 255.255.255.255" not working to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1064005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: netcfg Version: 1.187 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Setting a netmask of 255.255.255.255 (in my case using preseed, but I guess the same happens if using the UI) fails the installer with Unreachable gateway (even if the gateway is set). I agree it can be seen as an odd setup, but it's valid and works when configured manually in busybox and Linux. My usecase is creating routed Debian VMs, where the host have a static route to the guest's IP (or v6 /128). With a smaller subnet (like /23), we would have to use proxy ARP which is usually not recommended. You can see more information in: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/phame/post/view/312/ganeti_on_modern_network_design/ My current workaround is to use a smaller netmask then run the following in early_command: IFACE=$(ip -4 route list 0/0 | sed -r 's/.*dev ([^ ]*) .*/\1/' | head -1) IP="$(ip address show dev $IFACE | egrep '^[[:space:]]+inet ' | cut -d ' ' -f 6 | cut -d '/' -f 1)" ip addr del $IP dev $IFACE ip addr add $IP/32 dev $IFACE ip route add 10.192.24.1 dev $IFACE scope link ip route add default via 10.192.24.1 Right after "netcfg" It would of course be cleaner if netcfg were to handle a /32 "out of the box". Similarly, DHCP can allocate such IPs, see for example : https://blog.fhrnet.eu/2020/03/07/dhcp-server-on-a-32-subnet/ I haven't tested DHCP in Debian Installer with such setup though. Please let me know if I can be of any help. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-18-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU thread; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: netcfg Source-Version: 1.187+deb12u1 Done: Colin Watson We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1064...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson (supplier of updated netcfg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 17:32:45 +0100 Source: netcfg Architecture: source Version: 1.187+deb12u1 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Colin Watson Closes: 1064005 Changes: netcfg (1.187+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium . * Handle routing for single-address netmasks (closes: #1064005). Checksums-Sha1: 7e3dbc53ae323a06de302abfe913e6250999ca55 1929 netcfg_1.187+deb12u1.dsc b4d9351abcc72e6623d08f7ce1a5ad6cc4e6e2d1 403188 netcfg_1.187+deb12u1.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: b15307ed1ec700e3c41c6f2a41a468a7e6aad4ba86f36716b9b24f5b3e166c4d 1929 netcfg_1.187+deb12u1.dsc a3bdde6687b8489b97e7d0ebb08edee3466f3a3b048a90c9d7125863502039ef 403188 netcfg_1.187+deb12u1.tar.xz Files: bcd770b14c476c7c87fd73d6d04d 1929 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.187+deb12u1.dsc bd15007249be40c9041d1d0178ecb755 403188 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.187+deb12u1.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEErApP8SYRtvzPAcEROTWH2X2GUAsFAmZMzRoACgkQOTWH2X2G UAscLRAAo/M1CE6pPU6mUJwspR5FS1IRVIpQN9Qg2yWS/sYINx8VI0+AxEWVgQ30 9qTsNIl4ZVaSKLMDghkTTF8jN9SOMtnlvNpZn5P7x/oRLeBYhDe5guParHv4ozQz vs0HeCuYKdVa8v6riBnhvA1JAvwCk6AXomunys+ZoIxNeqLsW3A0GauoAQRRwsWg JrdupiBucfdQw0hY11ZdX7flHhwGDulZEnagtnlzJhpbix3rfnncbRUKCMi78C8N 6vLQRbMaUKIjnKcwfjwb7x+ffxHWzqr3nIqi4U7ZKLUFJ0uVAQnKX0PTraypHNrj sMQ+oFsdyjZhEVkgfwgFWC4q
Processed: Re: Bug#1072092: piuparts: switch default tmpdir to /var/tmp/
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 debootstrap Bug #1072092 [src:piuparts] piuparts: switch default tmpdir to /var/tmp/ Bug reassigned from package 'src:piuparts' to 'debootstrap'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1072092 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1072092 to the same values previously set > affects -1 + piuparts debos vmdb2 Bug #1072092 [debootstrap] piuparts: switch default tmpdir to /var/tmp/ Added indication that 1072092 affects piuparts, debos, and vmdb2 -- 1072092: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072092 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: clone 1017542
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 1017542 -1
Bug #1017542 {Done: Luca Boccassi } [partman-crypto]
systemd-cryptsetup@vda5_crypt.service: Control process exited, code=exited,
status=1/FAILURE
Bug 1017542 cloned as bug 1072058
> reopen -1
Bug #1072058 {Done: Luca Boccassi } [partman-crypto]
systemd-cryptsetup@vda5_crypt.service: Control process exited, code=exited,
status=1/FAILURE
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions partman-crypto/125.
> reassign -1 cryptsetup-initramfs 2:2.6.1-4~deb12u2
Bug #1072058 [partman-crypto] systemd-cryptsetup@vda5_crypt.service: Control
process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Bug reassigned from package 'partman-crypto' to 'cryptsetup-initramfs'.
No longer marked as found in versions partman-crypto/103.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1072058 to the same values
previously set
Bug #1072058 [cryptsetup-initramfs] systemd-cryptsetup@vda5_crypt.service:
Control process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Marked as found in versions cryptsetup/2:2.6.1-4~deb12u2.
> retitle -1 cryptsetup-initramfs: set x-initrd.attach option in crypttab
Bug #1072058 [cryptsetup-initramfs] systemd-cryptsetup@vda5_crypt.service:
Control process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Changed Bug title to 'cryptsetup-initramfs: set x-initrd.attach option in
crypttab' from 'systemd-cryptsetup@vda5_crypt.service: Control process exited,
code=exited, status=1/FAILURE'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1017542: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017542
1072058: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072058
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Bug#1017542 marked as pending in partman-crypto
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1017542 [partman-crypto] systemd-cryptsetup@vda5_crypt.service: Control process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Added tag(s) pending. -- 1017542: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017542 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: reassign 1017542
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1017542 partman-crypto 103 Bug #1017542 [systemd] systemd-cryptsetup@vda5_crypt.service: Control process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'partman-crypto'. No longer marked as found in versions systemd/247.3-7. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1017542 to the same values previously set Bug #1017542 [partman-crypto] systemd-cryptsetup@vda5_crypt.service: Control process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Marked as found in versions partman-crypto/103. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1017542: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017542 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Bug#1071873 marked as pending in debian-installer
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1071873 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies Added tag(s) pending. -- 1071873: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071873 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1071873: debian-installer: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #1071873 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies Added tag(s) patch. -- 1071873: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071873 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 1071823
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1071823 + pending Bug #1071823 [console-setup] console-setup: [Hurd i386] debconf: lsmod: not found Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1071823: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071823 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#701139: marked as done (netcfg: IPv6 netmask is bogus when IP address entered in CIDR format)
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2024 12:49:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#701139: fixed in netcfg 1.189 has caused the Debian Bug report #701139, regarding netcfg: IPv6 netmask is bogus when IP address entered in CIDR format to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 701139: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701139 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: netcfg Version: 1.106 Severity: normal Hello, While trying manual IPv6 configuration, I got a bogus IPv6 netmask: - boot in expert mode, answer questions by default until: - request not to do any autoconf, but enter network configuration manually - enter fc00::1/64 as manual IP address - enter fc00::2 as gateway - enter fc00::3 as DNS The network configuration summary then shows netmask as being 255.255.255.255, i.e. an IPv4 netmask. It thus seems the IPv4 code still gets triggered, rather than producing the IPv6 ::::: netmask. Samuel -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.8.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Samuel le y est un animal discret se logeant facilement dans un terminal *** c has changed the topic on channel #ens-mim to ne pas jeter de cacahuetes aux ys, svp -+- #ens-mim - n'oubliez pas le guide -+- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: netcfg Source-Version: 1.189 Done: Colin Watson We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 701...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson (supplier of updated netcfg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:30:01 +0100 Source: netcfg Architecture: source Version: 1.189 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Colin Watson Closes: 701139 1064005 Changes: netcfg (1.189) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Colin Watson ] * netcfg_activate_static_*: Add more logging. * Fix display of IPv6 netmasks in netcfg/confirm_static (closes: #701139). * Handle routing for single-address netmasks (closes: #1064005). . [ Updated translations ] * Welsh (cy.po) by Rhodri * Hungarian (hu.po) by SZERVÁC Attila * Macedonian (mk.po) by Kristijan Fremen Velkovski * Marathi (mr.po) by omwani * Dutch (nl.po) by Frans Spiesschaert * Occitan (oc.po) by Quentin PAGÈS * Punjabi (Gurmukhi) (pa.po) by Aman Alam Checksums-Sha1: 40d189888e131b0686208d1f0621f3d6f1e6fe50 1889 netcfg_1.189.dsc e482269bc946438bb1444c30d235dac5288dd92b 403604 netcfg_1.189.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 36709f729af2716c6b990681280e95148c9e38ddf4a6a1928f2fdc485bcecd7a 1889 netcfg_1.189.dsc 197e87aaaf2c68c1c5bbb6c58b11aba74770a08001067db3c60fac22d0da0f96 403604 netcfg_1.189.tar.xz Files: 659fd2f9cdfd3419a8822a6ecbd1a26b 1889 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.189.dsc b8c64fa8fddba6111727b3debb6dd43f 403604 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.189.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIyBAEBCAAdFiEErApP8SYRtvzPAcEROTWH2X2GUAsFAmZMlBkACgkQOTWH2X2G UAsvRw/4mJEFuBhTok5Oozk0gik28zFqD/YEmOE/gTRR4P7wPx3nCqdjvCcPq3Ou dw9jhhZUApvG9m1Bjr0LLaDzWVb6blOv3NFYwEPZbgI//vvc9GC7Fa3STFWsfcOa 5Qvd3J1JpEunmEdpqoFDO3v1OXBw+i+egLcZquSvtc6HmRhLWioRaemb+cQzfYWc JTHYOTuyF7f3nzUt+E03+RoRuq7fXC1PtRqRtjzSnZdlDRbvzVl5QMBwX0cnKFSF 46wmdlrFFkzAUsPfnYvif9y/0QSFMqoBGJnFCXw0/lQxeIcd4TaYaCiY5Y18d1J4 wVzlv6vFBkTkZb40Pygz4uV0xzkr30XTDF3jvJnqgfdC58uc04KghqYXwXQlRcBL qzXOb+77b5pILArJAuja02mb+MhLra6qMWOScfjC1E9cJuyEBAav1vJF+BeE0jas NKxRsfGOac/HOaBYRYbK8B613L0qKJyiemeLBrVpJ3xN5rUYJrL9n7c+fSyX+8Bv UBd7aYhdGBN/Hwfy1LDvWTftjzGtlADNNw/9ptSHgd4W46bQy87nhwejr2tXXAsV gATCVCGhEDr9tWq06ltU5QYETRYMMNWd4XwhsdmMJpuC3BAOKh4zgh3gmzrCGzba koQxrwndXU/yRUwx+txrQuz74ztyN/ymL7N0B8yWVi9aAXkFHA== =Ylc5 -END PGP SIGNATURE
Bug#1064005: marked as done (netcfg: "get_netmask string 255.255.255.255" not working)
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2024 12:49:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1064005: fixed in netcfg 1.189 has caused the Debian Bug report #1064005, regarding netcfg: "get_netmask string 255.255.255.255" not working to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1064005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: netcfg Version: 1.187 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Setting a netmask of 255.255.255.255 (in my case using preseed, but I guess the same happens if using the UI) fails the installer with Unreachable gateway (even if the gateway is set). I agree it can be seen as an odd setup, but it's valid and works when configured manually in busybox and Linux. My usecase is creating routed Debian VMs, where the host have a static route to the guest's IP (or v6 /128). With a smaller subnet (like /23), we would have to use proxy ARP which is usually not recommended. You can see more information in: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/phame/post/view/312/ganeti_on_modern_network_design/ My current workaround is to use a smaller netmask then run the following in early_command: IFACE=$(ip -4 route list 0/0 | sed -r 's/.*dev ([^ ]*) .*/\1/' | head -1) IP="$(ip address show dev $IFACE | egrep '^[[:space:]]+inet ' | cut -d ' ' -f 6 | cut -d '/' -f 1)" ip addr del $IP dev $IFACE ip addr add $IP/32 dev $IFACE ip route add 10.192.24.1 dev $IFACE scope link ip route add default via 10.192.24.1 Right after "netcfg" It would of course be cleaner if netcfg were to handle a /32 "out of the box". Similarly, DHCP can allocate such IPs, see for example : https://blog.fhrnet.eu/2020/03/07/dhcp-server-on-a-32-subnet/ I haven't tested DHCP in Debian Installer with such setup though. Please let me know if I can be of any help. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-18-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU thread; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: netcfg Source-Version: 1.189 Done: Colin Watson We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1064...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson (supplier of updated netcfg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:30:01 +0100 Source: netcfg Architecture: source Version: 1.189 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Colin Watson Closes: 701139 1064005 Changes: netcfg (1.189) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Colin Watson ] * netcfg_activate_static_*: Add more logging. * Fix display of IPv6 netmasks in netcfg/confirm_static (closes: #701139). * Handle routing for single-address netmasks (closes: #1064005). . [ Updated translations ] * Welsh (cy.po) by Rhodri * Hungarian (hu.po) by SZERVÁC Attila * Macedonian (mk.po) by Kristijan Fremen Velkovski * Marathi (mr.po) by omwani * Dutch (nl.po) by Frans Spiesschaert * Occitan (oc.po) by Quentin PAGÈS * Punjabi (Gurmukhi) (pa.po) by Aman Alam Checksums-Sha1: 40d189888e131b0686208d1f0621f3d6f1e6fe50 1889 netcfg_1.189.dsc e482269bc946438bb1444c30d235dac5288dd92b 403604 netcfg_1.189.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 36709f729af2716c6b990681280e95148c9e38ddf4a6a1928f2fdc485bcecd7a 1889 netcfg_1.189.dsc 197e87aaaf2c68c1c5bbb6c58b11aba74770a08001067db3c60fac22d0da0f96 403604 netcfg_1.189.tar.xz Files: 659fd2f9cdfd3419a8822a6ecbd1a26b 1889 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.189.dsc b8c64fa8fddba6111727b3debb6dd43f 403604 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.189.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIyBAEBCAAdFiEErApP8SYRtvzPAcE
Processed: Bug#1064005 marked as pending in netcfg
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1064005 [src:netcfg] netcfg: "get_netmask string 255.255.255.255" not working Added tag(s) pending. -- 1064005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: reassign 1071184 to src:linux, found 1071184 in 6.7.12-1, reassign 1071174 to src:onionshare ...
item_t*, obs_transform_info*)’ is
deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1062249 + sid trixie experimental
Bug #1062249 {Done: Micha Lenk } [src:libchipcard]
libchipcard: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) experimental, trixie, and sid.
> tags 1018336 + sid trixie
Bug #1018336 {Done: Emmanuel Arias } [src:deap] deap:
build-depends on python3-nose or uses it for autopkgtest
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1062022 + sid trixie experimental
Bug #1062022 [src:dcmtk] dcmtk: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) experimental, sid, and trixie.
> tags 1070638 + sid trixie
Bug #1070638 {Done: Patrick Franz } [src:kde-spectacle]
kde-spectacle: Build-depends on NBS libkcolorpicker-dev
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1070459 + sid trixie
Bug #1070459 [src:psortb] psortb: FTBFS: binding.c:52:13: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘free’
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1018336: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018336
1060134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060134
1062022: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062022
1062249: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062249
1062444: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062444
1062511: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062511
1062860: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062860
1062984: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062984
1063177: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063177
1070459: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070459
1070638: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070638
1070980: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070980
1071017: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071017
1071125: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071125
1071174: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071174
1071184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071184
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1060134: marked as done (kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod)
Your message dated Thu, 16 May 2024 19:20:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1060134: fixed in busybox 1:1.36.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1060134, regarding kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1060134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: kmod-udeb,busybox-udeb Severity: serious Justification: file conflict X-Debbugs-Cc: Cyril Brulebois , debian-boot@lists.debian.org Hi Cyril, On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 04:31:44AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > d-i daily builds now FTBFS everywhere due to the merge-usr step, with > the following error: > > merge-usr "./tmp/cdrom/tree" > error: merge target 'usr//sbin/depmod' is a symlink > > It would be nice if you could investigate and suggest what fix(es) would > be best here. I suppose it could be some fallout from the kmod upload > which included some changes of yours, hence the ping. > > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1491892/accepted-kmod-31-1-source-into-unstable/ Thank you for the report. In investigating it, I note that reproducing the failure was unexpectedly difficult. debian-installer fails to build from source in unstable for unrelated reasons. I request that you update the package more frequently and keep it in a buildable state to ease QA efforts of others. It turns out that /sbin/depmod points to /bin/busybox and /usr/sbin/depmod points to ../bin/kmod. As such, merge-usr does not have a good idea of what to do and rightly refuses to continue. These two files are to be considered a file conflict according to the Debian policy as they only differ in aliasing. I argue that this was a bug before merged-/usr and merged-/usr just makes it visible now. The underlying conflict has existed earlier and was resolved arbitrarily dependent on the order of unpacks. The real solution here is to agree on whether busybox-udeb or kmod-udeb is supposed to provide depmod and only ship it once. Since there is no other consumer of udebs, it does not make sense to install it in both. Cyril, please reassign the bug to the right package (i.e. the one that should not be providing depmod). I also recommend to establish QA for all udebs to automatically detect, report and address such conflicts as they evidently cause undefined behaviour otherwise. That can be as simple as collecting file lists of all udebs and comparing them. Helmut --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: busybox Source-Version: 1:1.36.1-7 Done: Michael Tokarev We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of busybox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1060...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Tokarev (supplier of updated busybox package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 21:49:03 +0300 Source: busybox Architecture: source Version: 1:1.36.1-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Michael Tokarev Closes: 1060134 1069864 Changes: busybox (1:1.36.1-7) unstable; urgency=medium . * udeb: remove all modutils (kmod-udeb provides better alternatives) (Closes: #1060134) * deb, static, udeb: provide install applet (Closes: #1069864) * udhcpc/default.script: recognize $search dhcp parameter too, in addition to $domain (and simplify these parts a bit) Checksums-Sha1: c4a67d14dbdad9698c915485270c6f6bc7f588a7 1954 busybox_1.36.1-7.dsc 9b37bb6b1ddfe41eac4a551751d37bb37de8d5eb 66708 busybox_1.36.1-7.debian.tar.xz 93c723b6fb881663e3bf80c73363da943b3d96d9 6352 busybox_1.36.1-7_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 8d387dfc4159ea54832c878bc5602c8d9a9eebcba0d24a6f7091dcdbc51ec8a5 1954 busybox_1.36.1-7.dsc 602dd21460f6dff82fb23a3b71d40a4d402dbc3d8864704d7d89a8563dd9d62f 66708 busybox_1.36.1-7.debian.tar.xz c689e977c5937caed55fe249812e0de57516fcaede5241e222f1610f49b6a24a 6352 busybox_1.36.1-7_source.buildinfo Files: 4b46ee
Bug#1069864: marked as done (busybox: Please enable "install" applet)
Your message dated Thu, 16 May 2024 19:20:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069864: fixed in busybox 1:1.36.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069864, regarding busybox: Please enable "install" applet to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1069864: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069864 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: busybox Version: 1:1.35.0-4+b3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, BusyBox can provide a simple version of "install" command (https://busybox.net/downloads/BusyBox.html#install). Unfortunately, in the package configuration, the options responsible for enabling this applet are not set: # CONFIG_INSTALL is not set # CONFIG_FEATURE_INSTALL_LONG_OPTIONS is not set (for all 3 packages - regular, static and udeb) This is a quite frequently used command that is part of coreutils, so it is worth making it available in the minimal environment provided by BusyBox. Simple patch (for regular package) attached. Regards, Robert Paciorek -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.0 APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages busybox depends on: ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u4 busybox recommends no packages. busybox suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- busybox-1.36.1.org/debian/config/pkg/deb2023-11-13 13:46:07.0 + +++ busybox-1.36.1/debian/config/pkg/deb2024-04-24 02:07:05.532609382 + @@ -265,8 +265,8 @@ CONFIG_HOSTID=y CONFIG_ID=y CONFIG_GROUPS=y -# CONFIG_INSTALL is not set -# CONFIG_FEATURE_INSTALL_LONG_OPTIONS is not set +CONFIG_INSTALL=y +CONFIG_FEATURE_INSTALL_LONG_OPTIONS=y CONFIG_LINK=y CONFIG_LN=y CONFIG_LOGNAME=y --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: busybox Source-Version: 1:1.36.1-7 Done: Michael Tokarev We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of busybox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1069...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Tokarev (supplier of updated busybox package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 21:49:03 +0300 Source: busybox Architecture: source Version: 1:1.36.1-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Michael Tokarev Closes: 1060134 1069864 Changes: busybox (1:1.36.1-7) unstable; urgency=medium . * udeb: remove all modutils (kmod-udeb provides better alternatives) (Closes: #1060134) * deb, static, udeb: provide install applet (Closes: #1069864) * udhcpc/default.script: recognize $search dhcp parameter too, in addition to $domain (and simplify these parts a bit) Checksums-Sha1: c4a67d14dbdad9698c915485270c6f6bc7f588a7 1954 busybox_1.36.1-7.dsc 9b37bb6b1ddfe41eac4a551751d37bb37de8d5eb 66708 busybox_1.36.1-7.debian.tar.xz 93c723b6fb881663e3bf80c73363da943b3d96d9 6352 busybox_1.36.1-7_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 8d387dfc4159ea54832c878bc5602c8d9a9eebcba0d24a6f7091dcdbc51ec8a5 1954 busybox_1.36.1-7.dsc 602dd21460f6dff82fb23a3b71d40a4d402dbc3d8864704d7d89a8563dd9d62f 66708 busybox_1.36.1-7.debian.tar.xz c689e977c5937caed55fe249812e0de57516fcaede5241e222f1610f49b6a24a 6352 busybox_1.36.1-7_source.buildinfo Files: 4b46ee0b205392c42ba7fb1986eb8c98 1954 utils optional busybox_1.36.1-7.dsc 264e149c43c1250200801066b8f7ee8a 66708 utils optional busybox_1.36.1-7.debian.tar.xz f0fdc456a88231b6006681560a91ab3e 6352 utils optional busybox_1.36.1-7_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQFDBAEBCgAtFiEEe3O61ovnosKJMUsicBtPaxppPlkFAmZGVVgPHG1qdEB0bHMu bXNrLnJ1AAoJEHAbT2saaT5ZMLYH/RTawFiOHKvfhBhq
Bug#1071227: marked as done (busybox-udeb: provides binaries that are also provided by kmod-udeb (e.g. modprobe))
Your message dated Thu, 16 May 2024 19:50:58 +0200 with message-id <87pltlprwd@hands.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1071227: busybox-udeb: provides binaries that are also provided by kmod-udeb (e.g. modprobe) has caused the Debian Bug report #1071227, regarding busybox-udeb: provides binaries that are also provided by kmod-udeb (e.g. modprobe) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1071227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: busybox-udeb Severity: normal User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Hi, I notice that busybox-udeb provides the following binaries in /sbin: depmod insmod lsmod modinfo modprobe rmmod while kmod-udeb provides the same, except located in /usr/sbin. It would be better if this were not the case, especially now that D-I is /usr-merged, so one will presumably get to use whichever of those is unpacked last. This suggests to me that the versions from kmod-udeb should be used, and busybox-udeb should be configured to no longer generate these binaries. BTW I'm assuming that these binaries only make sense on Linux, so it's that it's fine that non-linux builds will not have them (kmod-udeb being linux only). Cheers, Phil. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Michael Tokarev writes: > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/busybox/-/commit/a52da181d4cd0e41c04ab1d5be9130270df0f696 > #1060134 Oh, ooops -- sorry for the noise. I'll close that then. Cheers, Phil. -- Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil--- End Message ---
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 731859 -unreproducible Bug #731859 [debootstrap] debootstrap: variant=fakechroot fails Removed tag(s) unreproducible. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 731859: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed (with 1 error): your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 731859 -reproducible +pending Unknown tag/s: reproducible. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody sarge sarge-ignore etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore jessie jessie-ignore stretch stretch-ignore buster buster-ignore bullseye bullseye-ignore bookworm bookworm-ignore trixie trixie-ignore forky forky-ignore. Bug #731859 [debootstrap] debootstrap: variant=fakechroot fails Requested to remove no tags; doing nothing. Bug #731859 [debootstrap] debootstrap: variant=fakechroot fails Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 731859: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#783950: marked as done (d-i.debian.org: PO spellchecking broken)
Your message dated Sat, 11 May 2024 11:20:22 +0200
with message-id <3ee6f845-bcb8-4c4f-859a-e7ce46bfe...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: d-i.debian.org: PO spellchecking broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #783950,
regarding d-i.debian.org: PO spellchecking broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
783950: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783950
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: d-i.debian.org
Severity: normal
The set of scripts that generate D-I l10n spellchecking statistics are
apparently broken since the d-i.debian.org host was upgraded to
Jessie. Output follows.
The master script that generates the following is:
d-i@dillon:/srv/d-i.debian.org/home/l10n/material/packages.cvs1/debian-installer$
cat ~/bin/d-i_spellcheck
#!/bin/sh
cd ${HOME}/trunk/scripts/l10n/l10n-spellcheck/cfg
svn -q update
./update_po.sh
for i in man l1 l2 l3 ; do
#echo Spellchecking level $i
./scheck.sh $i
done
Sadly, I'm not sure that anyone but Davide Viti who wrote the original
set of scripts, can fix this...:-)
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon -
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 03:21:51 +
From: Cron Daemon
To: bubu...@dillon.debian.org, k...@dillon.debian.org
Subject: Cron $HOME/bin/d-i_spellcheck ; ~/bin/push-www
X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 14.9657 )
Error: The language "el" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/el.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/fileJxXALD" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "fi" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/fi.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: No word lists can be found for the language "fi".
Error: The language "hu" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/hu.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/file3Sl4iA" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "pt_PT" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/pt_PT.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/fileUIdsQ1" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "ro" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/ro.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/file35GqWl" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "ru" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/ru.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/fileonFXd8" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "sv" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/sv.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/fileloE2Q7" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "tl" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/tl.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/filebVYCcl" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "en" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/en.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/fileudTxQU" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "am" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/am.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/fileMBYqZb" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "ar" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/ar.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/filepXr5H3" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "bg" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/bg.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/fileEiMT0M" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language "bn" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/bn.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/usr/lib/aspell/bn.rws" is not in the proper format.
Incompatible hash function.
Error: The language "ca" is not known. This is probably because: the file
"/usr/share/aspell/ca.dat" can not be opened for reading.
Error: The file "/tmp/fileqIP8Md" is not in the proper format.
Error: The language &
Processed: Bug#701139 marked as pending in netcfg
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #701139 [netcfg] netcfg: IPv6 netmask is bogus when IP address entered in CIDR format Added tag(s) pending. -- 701139: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701139 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: retitle 621788
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 621788 Please support GRUB2 FDE (without separate unencrypted /boot) Bug #621788 [partman-crypto] Please support encryption without separate /boot, with encryption support in current GRUB2 Changed Bug title to 'Please support GRUB2 FDE (without separate unencrypted /boot)' from 'Please support encryption without separate /boot, with encryption support in current GRUB2'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 621788: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621788 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1053678: marked as done (partman-crypto: Requires separate /boot partition, even if not required)
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2024 00:58:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1053678: fixed in partman-crypto 124 has caused the Debian Bug report #1053678, regarding partman-crypto: Requires separate /boot partition, even if not required to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1053678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053678 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: partman-crypto Version: 121 Severity: normal Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: j24...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, The `crypto_check_mountpoints` script prevents you from setting up an encrypted root filesystem without an additional unencrypted /boot filesystem. While this may be a requirement for e.g. grub2, it is not necessarily required when not using grub2 but using UKIs to build EFI executables that can directly mount the encrypted root filesystem. While UKIs aren't currently supported, I would still expect partman-crypto to let me partition an encrypted root filesystem without separate /boot filesystem, at least after having ignored the warnings or in combination with the `nobootloader` udeb. I would suggest letting users ignore the warning and continue if they really want to, similar to the warning by LVM2. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: SELinux: enabled - Mode: Enforcing - Policy name: bauen1-policy --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: partman-crypto Source-Version: 124 Done: Luca Boccassi We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of partman-crypto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1053...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Boccassi (supplier of updated partman-crypto package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 01:21:11 +0100 Source: partman-crypto Architecture: source Version: 124 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Luca Boccassi Closes: 1053678 Changes: partman-crypto (124) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. * Make /boot optional with an override (Closes: #1053678) Checksums-Sha1: 8228110fd2a8d425136be792b30d5b66050146a2 1795 partman-crypto_124.dsc 60c6c97f88d76f680071c68123e803642ed9c212 291384 partman-crypto_124.tar.xz 6f656c74826b89978b2fc569f7908a63cb95c4ba 6595 partman-crypto_124_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 3588565104272771acd4428cf80dc1edf9cc0eef2826eac7c447cac00b795820 1795 partman-crypto_124.dsc 4196900f23be8c41d1bccca305174027bc31784a0a6fa25d1707ac87cf2a7988 291384 partman-crypto_124.tar.xz 22747494b101fedcc0f0f8e627af21260a75d17d9f20a40075e162a954326810 6595 partman-crypto_124_source.buildinfo Files: 20765a4a67dcab870b2bb19822b006a5 1795 debian-installer optional partman-crypto_124.dsc ac10829eb7ee043b60d6c6d89f4af8f8 291384 debian-installer optional partman-crypto_124.tar.xz 9616eeb16aacb21427939baa201a6210 6595 debian-installer optional partman-crypto_124_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJFBAEBCgAvFiEErCSqx93EIPGOymuRKGv37813JB4FAmY5dJcRHGJsdWNhQGRl Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQKGv37813JB7zZA/+Ku2UHUEHxLJfBBag45WcDA60VWgV2Xz+ Ti4F4T4gU7gLqfNVhKlHl4F/fhQ8bLPQLlrRRYET5r0FQRnuOx1Vz6kYC0LEB126 jpXZyURHbEsFkpu1D2K8yV8+owygy9z69PrgUdOfdcvA24GQU+XGw94YfAOYSVUv 1fHloCBuwLuTpbHN4WDPlZsQ8Fjypc1lQwG+McSem7I7oShvlD8YEnHc+5gwOsjq 2VUu3/KK+4LouTZ1KMGCaQpY6ZRxgX0OGA2TvxRLK1Wg3AtAudWLvzp0Hvvg2AEX VKwGwqoncjyCFdvRpE25xkdErwIfi4BtZJZxPe6Oe2umbPyvuQe9vNt699xVJ39Z 0uRveKbGOy9PioQg9gd12b8gvYnqrWWAPjrnge9C8+aUBcLlE6OPKRzrnDhSJYAK TIsa/OjuayM7tTHC3ytkcKI8NvhxVwRGO1ASFHk9Y+Dpdf0eeRrgxL5M2iEL3RwQ MFh+zdK3NF9YzzKi2mpQGHweB44HG155ayF7rgKhrUCTQFXZry8CHazzOOY5IhbR Q783nipJIAtZz50VIPciXBYdpq+xaclyzNbggPfcja+vMW4rW1RrFieMKg2BRh+7 Dx/u7YrnXh7BCkXEC3fLTEUt0H/EVSiSpAo8vZN2Vro6zfgnBzQ5bHtN7gsoS0wp +adDZOZs7L0= =2fat -END PGP
Processed: Bug#1053678 marked as pending in partman-crypto
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1053678 [partman-crypto] partman-crypto: Requires separate /boot partition, even if not required Added tag(s) pending. -- 1053678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053678 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1053678: partman-crypto: Requires separate /boot partition, even if not required
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1053678 [partman-crypto] partman-crypto: Requires separate /boot partition, even if not required Added tag(s) patch. -- 1053678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053678 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1043226: marked as done (debian-installer: Please consider moving root user setup to expert install, or change text)
Your message dated Sat, 4 May 2024 15:16:05 +0200 with message-id <20240504151605.fac9949d94d21c59de696...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1043226: debian-installer: Please consider moving root user setup to expert install, or change text has caused the Debian Bug report #1043226, regarding debian-installer: Please consider moving root user setup to expert install, or change text to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1043226: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043226 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: debian-installer Version: 20230607+deb12u1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, When setting up users and passwords in debian-installer in a default install, it prompts a user to set up a root password. In d-i, this works very different than in other installers, which causes quite a bit of confusion for users. Firstly, the instructions start off with "You need to set a password for 'root'", followed by seemingly uninteresting text about what a good password should be, which makes it incredibly easy for users to miss the part that sudo won't be set up for the first user. So, many users, and especially newcomers to Debian, follow the instructions in the first line and are then surprised when they can't use sudo from their user from their newly installed system. Would it perhaps make more sense to move the root password setup to the expert install d-i preseed entirely? Since this is likely only something that expert users would require in the first place? Either that, or move the explanation of what happens upward so that it's more prominent and not so easy to miss. In the latter case, it might also be worth while changing the first line that says "you need to..." so that user won't feel compelled to immediately start typing a root password and click on next. Thank you for considering, -Jonathan --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- With latest user-setup upload 1.97, this has been dealed with, so closing. -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---
Bug#1059991: marked as done (grub-installer: build loong64.udeb for loongarch64)
Your message dated Sat, 04 May 2024 11:49:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1059991: fixed in grub-installer 1.201
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059991,
regarding grub-installer: build loong64.udeb for loongarch64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1059991: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: grub-installer
Version: 1.197
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: loong64
Dear maintainers,
We need to add build support for loongarch64 in debian/control.
Please consider the patch I have attached.
The grub-installer source package was compiled successfully on my local
environment.
I integrated grub-installer_1.197_loong64.udeb in my local DVD iso. When
installing the DVD iso through debian-installer, grub2 software packages
can be installed normally.
If you have any questions, you can contact me at any time.
thanks,
Dandan Zhang
diff -Nru grub-installer-1.197/debian/control
grub-installer-1.197/debian/control
--- grub-installer-1.197/debian/control 2023-09-20 11:00:26.0 +
+++ grub-installer-1.197/debian/control 2023-09-20 11:00:26.0 +
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/grub-installer.git
Package: grub-installer
-Architecture: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 ia64 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-amd64 mipsel powerpc ppc64 ppc64el sparc sparc64
+Architecture: amd64 arm64 armhf i386 ia64 hurd-i386 kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-amd64 loong64 mipsel powerpc ppc64 ppc64el sparc sparc64
XB-Subarchitecture: ${subarch}
Provides: bootable-system
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, kernel-installer, created-fstab,
di-utils, di-utils-mapdevfs, os-prober, partman-utils
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: grub-installer
Source-Version: 1.201
Done: Holger Wansing
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
grub-installer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 1059...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Holger Wansing (supplier of updated grub-installer
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 12:42:44 +0200
Source: grub-installer
Architecture: source
Version: 1.201
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Holger Wansing
Closes: 1059991
Changes:
grub-installer (1.201) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload.
.
[ John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ]
* Add loong64 support (Closes: #1059991)
.
[ Updated translations ]
* Arabic (ar.po) by Der Marschall
* Esperanto (eo.po) by phlostically
* Persian (fa.po) by EndermanXD
* Hindi (hi.po) by Scrambled777
* Hungarian (hu.po) by SZERVÁC Attila
* Macedonian (mk.po) by Kristijan Fremen Velkovski
* Dutch (nl.po) by Frans Spiesschaert
* Norwegian Nynorsk (nn.po) by Ola Haugen Havrevoll
* Romanian (ro.po) by ThinkRoot
Checksums-Sha1:
bf970a46799cef8798efd7b609cd796d0f055ad4 2081 grub-installer_1.201.dsc
aef1308ee35ab942e26a5d4efe1bda5fa0e86cba 248312 grub-installer_1.201.tar.xz
e284aea91c37c79891e24ff29ef23050654ea4a8 6743
grub-installer_1.201_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
93da9e49dfcffb02b4f29993cb1b7b18a7d0f0021e992d60331c66b4787cbcda 2081
grub-installer_1.201.dsc
4b4250e8e6869f9700ebc88d176d8026914ab11f4c3035f2f2cb39ed3c8bb39e 248312
grub-installer_1.201.tar.xz
7497bb56de707cd31cf8d0a78bb80c640c6ff74a3f9395d4633b73f5943c42be 6743
grub-installer_1.201_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
f4e4d5c033ffe8b16ba6621d5d5f9c3f 2081 debian-installer standard
grub-installer_1.201.dsc
f7f663a6e5f1b8439649eaa854774ff2 248312 debian-installer standard
grub-installer_1.201.tar.xz
df1621d14f823deb1bab6bb90de2 6743 debian-installer standard
grub-installer_1.201_amd64.buildinfo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQJJBAEBCgAzFiEESWrG6BRCSzSFCDUpWfGHyhVusHYFAmY2HbgVHGh3YW5zaW5n
QG1haWxib3gub3JnAAoJEFnxh8oVbrB2GisP/1XWDBlDQ3Y9BeD7NGPQrgDKnmAj
8xh1z
Processed: reset severity
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1016957 wishlist Bug #1016957 [src:kbd-chooser] kbd-chooser: please add support for riscv64 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1016957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016957 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1060422: marked as done (partman-crypto: add support for new cryptsetup options for opal/sed)
Your message dated Fri, 03 May 2024 22:52:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1060422: fixed in partman-crypto 123 has caused the Debian Bug report #1060422, regarding partman-crypto: add support for new cryptsetup options for opal/sed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1060422: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060422 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: partman-crypto Tags: patch Dear Maintainer(s), cryptsetup 2.7.0, currently in experimental, added support for self encrypting drives using the OPAL functionality as the encryption layer (managed by the kernel, not by the TCG utilities), both in standalone mode and with a nested dm-crypt layer. Key management is done using LUKS2, just like with dm-crypt, so that all existing functionality works out of the box (tokens, passphrases, keyfiles, etc). A standard LUKS2 header is used, which sits unencrypted on the disk as with dm- crypt, and the nested range is then encrypted using OPAL's functionality. I have added support for these new options in partman-crypto, MR on Salsa is open: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-crypto/-/merge_requests/7 The new options are shown only in the manual partitioning mode, and only if the kernel, cryptsetup and the device all support this functionality, otherwise they are hidden. A factory reset option for the disk is also exposed. A small utility to call the required ioctl to check for support on a given disk is added too. I have tested this with a Kingston drive and it seems to work as expected. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: partman-crypto Source-Version: 123 Done: Luca Boccassi We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of partman-crypto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1060...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Boccassi (supplier of updated partman-crypto package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 23:26:43 +0100 Source: partman-crypto Architecture: source Version: 123 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Luca Boccassi Closes: 1060422 Changes: partman-crypto (123) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. . [ Updated translations ] * Occitan (oc.po) by Quentin PAGÈS * Tibetian (bo.po) . [ Luca Boccassi ] * Add utility to check for OPAL support on a device * Add support for OPAL encryption via cryptsetup and LUKS2 (Closes: #1060422) Checksums-Sha1: b8ff68cacfb9bd684753c94744b27e1470855ff1 1795 partman-crypto_123.dsc 20509715fed43b6a9b195549e661c9566641c7e6 276392 partman-crypto_123.tar.xz e7ba75304411170a16d1de5c61cde4fc72564fdf 6595 partman-crypto_123_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 4cc087464a8c96d3f9e23a7750c9bb8d78fbf86a3ebeb8a8c7b9755cd9e1e911 1795 partman-crypto_123.dsc 69b33f8c77accc9786e26e1eaef2c5fde15fbd6b99d6cddae2b1fbd9723077de 276392 partman-crypto_123.tar.xz 2a125b56f6054c9c97d1ef8cfec6bb0b9a1ffcdff4b76c92c5cf35cf7a9f479b 6595 partman-crypto_123_source.buildinfo Files: 341466bda9798a78be01625b79429f8d 1795 debian-installer optional partman-crypto_123.dsc 9ddcee54a9dc483e66aceb5b2312099b 276392 debian-installer optional partman-crypto_123.tar.xz 0627b6a0e5628a9e50c562618e2a9b50 6595 debian-installer optional partman-crypto_123_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJFBAEBCgAvFiEErCSqx93EIPGOymuRKGv37813JB4FAmY1ZUsRHGJsdWNhQGRl Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQKGv37813JB4c7BAAudZfcJ4FVoKCr6kgAyZzStUXEvc6lt45 RJgauEvFId2LX38fImfQPLCLdTA4RwDgG8tt86Ly69y3kODjQYlKFvq71lWu4oA+ GZ0jDEVjxHUBogjtUiCDRMHbyEId0kOcxhxeYPIa/6Xo4Xqe92O4bLs33Q4G1da7 38YIH52yLrLF5q+Vo7qnLyZgZr+hhPHGS8bH2Mh414KASOvq4E8KzJOF5Cg0qpFA bQR2zqieQE7E6gY3wMG4+K8y2HMGYQ76V/3qcoUsBJlTbQznlqB+y8dvjMobNXas 8JUqxaGrkjfdDufCgy6DlqAV7voHq+dQAPT8fvLwrPN6IpkHJ4HwsGLAy6dRq5yS BMqdQk/Ybkk1KwT2NiFhgdAuBTQ++8rMxxwMmxyNRHzoCPcWPUotr9XAS3tE96Fj QSR6u+3N1FKbVJWsaqIbBQxSopL
Processed: Bug#1060422 marked as pending in partman-crypto
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1060422 [src:partman-crypto] partman-crypto: add support for new cryptsetup options for opal/sed Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1060422 to the same tags previously set -- 1060422: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060422 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#998408: marked as done (debian-installer: "good password" advise)
Your message dated Fri, 3 May 2024 21:42:01 +0200 with message-id <20240503214201.b0b389be5197d4a9d1253...@mailbox.org> and subject line Uploading user-setup: update password selection advice has caused the Debian Bug report #998408, regarding debian-installer: "good password" advise to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 998408: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998408 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: debian-installer Version: 20210731+deb11u1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: alx.manpa...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, The Debian installer contains the following advise: "A good password will contain a mixture of letters, numbers and punctuation and should be changed at regular intervals." I disagree with this statement, which has been passing around for decades in many different environments, as a "universal truth" which only causes headaches and ends up necessarily in <https://xkcd.com/936/>. The opposite is actually true: - _Good_ passwords don't need to be changed that much. When was the last time you changed your PGP key? Probably never. - Especially, if you use a different password for every different account, you don't need to change them at all, unless they have been stolen, or you suspect that might have happened. - Adding punctuation to passwords only adds problems to yourself when you need to type it in a different keyboard, not to a computer that can brute force it. To put some numbers: a) Different characters if you use only (uppercase and lowercase) letters and numbers: 26 letters * 2 + 10 numbers = 62 b) Now, assume you can use the symbols available in your keyboard. My ANSI keyboard shows 32 different symbols other than the above. 62 + 32 = 94 Let's compare a 32-byte password using (b), to a 64-byte password using only (a): 62**64 = 5.16e+114 combinations 94**32 = 1.38e+63 combinations You would only need 38 characters of an alphanumeric password to have the same strength aprox (1.29e+68) than a braindamaged symbol password of 32 characters. So, you're adding difficulty to typing your own password for no reason all when you could just add a few more bytes to your sane password. If you're using a password manager, it can surely remember 64 bytes of alphanumeric bytes. I'm not sure if it will remember correctly some weird combination of characters. So if youre using a password manager, the best advise would be to use $(makepasswd --chars 64) and forget it. I must confess I have passwords that would make xkcd guys laugh, and they are for the few sites that still have those weird requirements. And when I'm forced to update it, you can guess how I do it :) (I don't feel guilty; not my fault). And if you need a password that you should remember, like your BIOS password, or your login password, you can't use a password manager, so there's even more reason to use a memorable but long one, and forget about the symbols. $(goxkcdpwgen) should work for you, and maybe you can use some options to it if you want a longer one. So my advise would be instead: "A good password will not need rare characters, but rather be as long as possible. Having a memorable random password can help it be longer, and therefore stronger." Or something similar. Sorry for the rant :-) Thanks, Alex -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.14.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.97 Forgot to mention bug closure in changelog before uploading, so closing now manually. -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---
Bug#868869: marked as done (debian-installer should not recommend to change password periodically (and more))
Your message dated Fri, 3 May 2024 21:42:01 +0200 with message-id <20240503214201.b0b389be5197d4a9d1253...@mailbox.org> and subject line Uploading user-setup: update password selection advice has caused the Debian Bug report #868869, regarding debian-installer should not recommend to change password periodically (and more) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 868869: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868869 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, >> A good password will contain a mixture of letters, numbers and punctuation >> and should be changed at regular intervals. Now debian-installer recommends to change root password periodically, however, nowadays it SHOULD NOT. e.g. NIST publishes Digital Identity Guidelines, in "5.1.1.2 Memorized Secret Verifiers" it says > Verifiers SHOULD NOT impose other composition rules (e.g., requiring > mixtures of different character types or prohibiting consecutively > repeated characters) for memorized secrets. Verifiers SHOULD NOT > require memorized secrets to be changed arbitrarily (e.g., periodically). see https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/sp800-63b.html We should follow it to provide secure environment for users, at least. Patch attached. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane >From 0cbb696c3a3bde3cb9f32f6778396eb341a0f137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hideki Yamane Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:15:03 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Do not recommend insecure password customs see Digital Identity Guidelines by NIST https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/sp800-63b.html > Verifiers SHOULD NOT impose other composition rules (e.g., requiring > mixtures of different character types or prohibiting consecutively > repeated characters) for memorized secrets. Verifiers SHOULD NOT > require memorized secrets to be changed arbitrarily (e.g., periodically). --- debian/user-setup-udeb.templates | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/user-setup-udeb.templates b/debian/user-setup-udeb.templates index 45e16b4..df58475 100644 --- a/debian/user-setup-udeb.templates +++ b/debian/user-setup-udeb.templates @@ -40,9 +40,6 @@ _Description: Root password: that is not easy to guess. It should not be a word found in dictionaries, or a word that could be easily associated with you. . - A good password will contain a mixture of letters, numbers and punctuation - and should be changed at regular intervals. - . The root user should not have an empty password. If you leave this empty, the root account will be disabled and the system's initial user account will be given the power to become root using the "sudo" -- 2.13.2 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.97 Forgot to mention bug closure in changelog before uploading, so closing now manually. -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---
Bug#1064617: marked as done (Passwords should not be changed frequently)
Your message dated Fri, 3 May 2024 21:42:01 +0200 with message-id <20240503214201.b0b389be5197d4a9d1253...@mailbox.org> and subject line Uploading user-setup: update password selection advice has caused the Debian Bug report #1064617, regarding Passwords should not be changed frequently to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1064617: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064617 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debian-installer I just did an installation with the 2024-02-24 debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso image. I forget the exact wording used, but when setting up a user, d-i printed advice that user passwords should be changed frequently. This is no longer current good advice (since 2017): "Verifiers SHOULD NOT require memorized secrets to be changed arbitrarily (e.g., periodically). However, verifiers SHALL force a change if there is evidence of compromise of the authenticator." https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-63b.pdf I happen to like their suggestion of providing a password-strength meter, but that would be a separate bug. This bug is simply a request to remove this outdated suggestion text from d-i. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.97 Forgot to mention bug closure in changelog before uploading, so closing now manually. -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1060422: partman-crypto: add support for new cryptsetup options for opal/sed
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #1060422 [src:partman-crypto] partman-crypto: add support for new cryptsetup options for opal/sed Added tag(s) pending. -- 1060422: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060422 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: owner 1064005
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 1064005 ! Bug #1064005 [src:netcfg] netcfg: "get_netmask string 255.255.255.255" not working Owner recorded as Colin Watson . > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1064005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 1069791
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1069791 + a11y Bug #1069791 [console-setup] console-setup: Build larger console fonts for HiDPI/accessibility with future 6.9 kernels Bug #816111 [console-setup] Larger font variants for HiDPI displays Added tag(s) a11y. Added tag(s) a11y. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069791: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069791 816111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816111 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#961590: marked as done (Include drm modules in non-gtk arm64 cdrom initrds)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:01:50 +0200 with message-id <88ad7768-b56d-4a1f-a50d-95604cc5b...@linaro.org> and subject line Bug not present in Trixie (resend from proper email address) has caused the Debian Bug report #961590, regarding Include drm modules in non-gtk arm64 cdrom initrds to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 961590: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961590 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: linux Severity: important Tags: d-i Devices with Mali gpu can use 'panfrost' driver to provide working framebuffer. And then Debian installer can be run on screen instead of serial console. But 'panfrost' module is not available when d-i starts ;( So please include 'panfrost' in 'fb-modules' udeb. -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.4 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.6.13-300.fc32.x86_64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: unable to detect --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Booted recent Trixie netinstall image in text mode on QEMU/sbsa-ref and got proper bochsdrm framebuffer. So bug can be closed. /lib/modules/6.7.12-arm64/kernel/drivers # lsmod|sort Module Size Used by ahci_platform 12288 0 bochs 16384 1 cdrom 61440 1 sr_mod crc64 16384 1 crc64_rocksoft crc64_rocksoft 16384 1 t10_pi crc_t10dif 16384 1 t10_pi crct10dif_common 12288 1 crc_t10dif drm 471040 6 drm_kms_helper,bochs,drm_vram_helper,drm_ttm_helper,ttm drm_kms_helper139264 5 bochs,drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper 12288 2 bochs,drm_vram_helper drm_vram_helper16384 1 bochs hid 139264 2 usbhid,hid_generic hid_generic12288 0 libahci40960 2 libahci_platform,ahci_platform libahci_platform 16384 1 ahci_platform libata307200 3 libahci,libahci_platform,ahci_platform nvme 45056 0 nvme_core 126976 1 nvme scsi_common12288 4 scsi_mod,sd_mod,libata,sr_mod scsi_mod 233472 3 sd_mod,libata,sr_mod sd_mod 65536 0 sr_mod 24576 0 t10_pi 16384 2 sd_mod,nvme_core ttm65536 2 drm_vram_helper,drm_ttm_helper usb_common 12288 3 xhci_hcd,usbcore,xhci_plat_hcd usbcore 274432 3 xhci_hcd,usbhid,xhci_plat_hcd usbhid 57344 0 xhci_hcd 249856 1 xhci_plat_hcd xhci_plat_hcd 16384 0--- End Message ---
Processed: tagging 816111
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 816111 + pending Bug #816111 [console-setup] Larger font variants for HiDPI displays Bug #1069791 [console-setup] console-setup: Build larger console fonts for HiDPI/accessibility with future 6.9 kernels Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069791: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069791 816111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816111 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1069791: console-setup: Build larger console fonts for HiDPI/accessibility with future 6.9 kernels
Processing control commands: > forcemerge -1 816111 Bug #1069791 [console-setup] console-setup: Build larger console fonts for HiDPI/accessibility with future 6.9 kernels Bug #816111 [console-setup] Larger font variants for HiDPI displays Bug #816111 [console-setup] Larger font variants for HiDPI displays Merged 816111 1069791 -- 1069791: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069791 816111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816111 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1069791: console-setup: Build larger console fonts for HiDPI/accessibility with future 6.9 kernels
Processing control commands: > forcemerge -1 816111 Bug #1069791 [console-setup] console-setup: Build larger console fonts for HiDPI/accessibility with future 6.9 kernels Bug #1069791 [console-setup] console-setup: Build larger console fonts for HiDPI/accessibility with future 6.9 kernels Marked as found in versions console-setup/1.137. Bug #816111 [console-setup] Larger font variants for HiDPI displays Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' 864320 was blocked by: 595696 816111 864320 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 864320: 816111 Marked as found in versions console-setup/1.226. Merged 816111 1069791 -- 1069791: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069791 816111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816111 864320: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864320 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 1069864
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1069864 + pending Bug #1069864 [busybox] busybox: Please enable "install" applet Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069864: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069864 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 1060134
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1060134 + pending Bug #1060134 [kmod-udeb,busybox-udeb] kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1060134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: base-files: EFI System Partition should mount on /efi not /boot/efi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1055583 debian-installer Bug #1055583 [base-files] base-files: EFI System Partition should mount on /efi not /boot/efi Bug reassigned from package 'base-files' to 'debian-installer'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1055583 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1055583 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1055583: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055583 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1068833: discover: A game installed via Discover doesn't start
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 plasma-discover 5.27.5-2 Bug #1068833 [discover] discover: A game installed via Discover doesn't start Bug reassigned from package 'discover' to 'plasma-discover'. No longer marked as found in versions discover/2.1.2-10. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1068833 to the same values previously set Bug #1068833 [plasma-discover] discover: A game installed via Discover doesn't start Marked as found in versions plasma-discover/5.27.5-2. -- 1068833: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068833 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: found 1060134 in 28-1, found 1060134 in 1:1.30.1-6, found 1068698 in 2:2.0-2 ..., tagging 1056608 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1060134 28-1
Bug #1060134 [kmod-udeb,busybox-udeb] kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who
ships depmod
There is no source info for the package 'busybox-udeb' at version '28-1' with
architecture ''
Marked as found in versions kmod/28-1.
> found 1060134 1:1.30.1-6
Bug #1060134 [kmod-udeb,busybox-udeb] kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who
ships depmod
There is no source info for the package 'kmod-udeb' at version '1:1.30.1-6'
with architecture ''
Marked as found in versions busybox/1:1.30.1-6.
> found 1068698 2:2.0-2
Bug #1068698 [src:hdf-eos5] hdf-eos5 2:2.0-2 silently reverts the 64-bit time_t
transition
Marked as found in versions hdf-eos5/2:2.0-2.
> notfound 1068696 0.2.15-5
Bug #1068696 [haskell-hourglass] haskell-hourglass FTBFS on armel and armhf
There is no source info for the package 'haskell-hourglass' at version
'0.2.15-5' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '0.2.15-5'
No longer marked as found in versions 0.2.15-5.
> found 1068696 0.2.12-5
Bug #1068696 [haskell-hourglass] haskell-hourglass FTBFS on armel and armhf
There is no source info for the package 'haskell-hourglass' at version
'0.2.12-5' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '0.2.12-5'
Marked as found in versions 0.2.12-5.
> retitle 1060939 python-workalendar: FTBFS: CalendarError: Need configure 2024
> for China.
Bug #1060939 [src:python-workalendar] python-workalendar: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned
exit code 13
Changed Bug title to 'python-workalendar: FTBFS: CalendarError: Need configure
2024 for China.' from 'python-workalendar: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild
--test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13'.
> tags 1056608 - bookworm
Bug #1056608 [timeshift] timeshift: Timeshift cant restore RSYNC snapshots if
your system installed on BTRFS with wrong subvolume
Removed tag(s) bookworm.
> fixed 1056608 23.07.1-1
Bug #1056608 [timeshift] timeshift: Timeshift cant restore RSYNC snapshots if
your system installed on BTRFS with wrong subvolume
Marked as fixed in versions timeshift/23.07.1-1.
> found 1052230 4.1.9-1
Bug #1052230 {Done: Stéphane Glondu } [src:ocamlnet]
"Missing build-dependency on pkg-config"
Marked as found in versions ocamlnet/4.1.9-1.
> tags 1052230 + sid trixie
Bug #1052230 {Done: Stéphane Glondu } [src:ocamlnet]
"Missing build-dependency on pkg-config"
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1050175 + sid trixie
Bug #1050175 {Done: Mo Zhou } [python3-torch] Missing symbol
when importing torch
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> found 1050516 1.4.3-1
Bug #1050516 {Done: Bastian Germann } [src:checkit-tiff]
checkit-tiff: FTBFS on big-endian platforms
The source 'checkit-tiff' and version '1.4.3-1' do not appear to match any
binary packages
Marked as found in versions checkit-tiff/1.4.3-1.
> tags 1042960 + sid trixie
Bug #1042960 {Done: Dmitry Baryshkov } [gcc-doc-base]
FTBFS: error: parsing file 'debian/gcc-doc/DEBIAN/control' near line 3 package
'gcc-doc'
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1042960: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042960
1050175: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050175
1050516: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050516
1052230: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052230
1056608: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056608
1060134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060134
1060939: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060939
1068696: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068696
1068698: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1068637: apt does not always install Recommends
Processing control commands: > reassign 1068637 debian-installer Bug #1068637 [debian-installer] apt does not always install Recommends Bug #931283 [debian-installer] base-installer doesn't install Recommends for most packages Bug #1068560 [debian-installer] "Recommends: thin-provisioning-tools" is insufficient or unnecessary Ignoring request to reassign bug #1068637 to the same package Ignoring request to reassign bug #931283 to the same package Ignoring request to reassign bug #1068560 to the same package > reassign 1068560 debian-installer Bug #1068560 [debian-installer] "Recommends: thin-provisioning-tools" is insufficient or unnecessary Bug #931283 [debian-installer] base-installer doesn't install Recommends for most packages Bug #1068637 [debian-installer] apt does not always install Recommends Ignoring request to reassign bug #1068560 to the same package Ignoring request to reassign bug #931283 to the same package Ignoring request to reassign bug #1068637 to the same package > forcemerge 931283 1068637 1068560 Bug #931283 [debian-installer] base-installer doesn't install Recommends for most packages Bug #1068560 [debian-installer] "Recommends: thin-provisioning-tools" is insufficient or unnecessary Bug #1068637 [debian-installer] apt does not always install Recommends Bug #1068560 [debian-installer] "Recommends: thin-provisioning-tools" is insufficient or unnecessary Bug #1068637 [debian-installer] apt does not always install Recommends Merged 931283 1068560 1068637 -- 1068560: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068560 1068637: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068637 931283: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1068637: apt does not always install Recommends
Processing control commands:
> reassign 1068637 debian-installer
Bug #1068637 [apt] apt does not always install Recommends
Bug reassigned from package 'apt' to 'debian-installer'.
No longer marked as found in versions apt/2.7.14.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1068637 to the same values
previously set
> reassign 1068560 debian-installer
Bug #1068560 {Done: Bastian Blank } [lvm2] "Recommends:
thin-provisioning-tools" is insufficient or unnecessary
Bug reassigned from package 'lvm2' to 'debian-installer'.
No longer marked as found in versions lvm2/2.03.22-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1068560 to the same values
previously set
> forcemerge 931283 1068637 1068560
Bug #931283 [debian-installer] base-installer doesn't install Recommends for
most packages
Bug #1068560 {Done: Bastian Blank } [debian-installer]
"Recommends: thin-provisioning-tools" is insufficient or unnecessary
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1068560 to the same values
previously set
Marked as found in versions debian-installer/20190410.
Bug #1068637 [debian-installer] apt does not always install Recommends
Severity set to 'important' from 'wishlist'
Marked as found in versions debian-installer/20190410.
Merged 931283 1068560 1068637
--
1068560: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068560
1068637: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068637
931283: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931283
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: severity of 878961 is important, affects 878961
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 878961 important Bug #878961 [debootstrap] debootstrap fails to resolve dependencies on virtual packages Bug #827602 [debootstrap] libdirectfb-dev depends on libpng but fails to install it when installing libdirectfb-dev Bug #931760 [debootstrap] doesn't pull perl-openssl-defaults in debootstrap Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > affects 878961 + systemd-container Bug #878961 [debootstrap] debootstrap fails to resolve dependencies on virtual packages Bug #827602 [debootstrap] libdirectfb-dev depends on libpng but fails to install it when installing libdirectfb-dev Bug #931760 [debootstrap] doesn't pull perl-openssl-defaults in debootstrap Added indication that 878961 affects systemd-container Added indication that 827602 affects systemd-container Added indication that 931760 affects systemd-container > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 827602: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827602 878961: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878961 931760: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931760 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Bug#1064617 marked as pending in user-setup
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1064617 [debian-installer] Passwords should not be changed frequently Added tag(s) pending. -- 1064617: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064617 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: debian-installer-netboot-images: accesses the internet during build
Processing control commands: > affects -1 buildd.debian.org Bug #1068198 [src:debian-installer-netboot-images] debian-installer-netboot-images: accesses the internet during build Added indication that 1068198 affects buildd.debian.org -- 1068198: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068198 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: debian-installer: accesses the internet during build
Processing control commands: > affects -1 buildd.debian.org Bug #1068197 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: accesses the internet during build Added indication that 1068197 affects buildd.debian.org -- 1068197: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068197 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: unarchiving 1061899, severity of 1061899 is important, user release.debian....@packages.debian.org ...
ux]
zfs-linux: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1063888
> severity 1063888 important
Bug #1063888 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:zfs-linux]
zfs-linux: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1063888 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1061899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061899
1061928: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061928
1062051: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062051
1062184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062184
1062277: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062277
1062291: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062291
1062333: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062333
1062632: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062632
1062865: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062865
1063105: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063105
1063140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063140
1063888: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063888
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#923091: marked as done (base-installer: Allow installing w/o the broken merged-usr-via-symlinks)
Your message dated Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:31:36 +0100 with message-id <20240319113136.w3x36ynyk4jjv...@shell.thinkmo.de> and subject line Re: Bug#923091: base-installer: Allow installing w/o the broken merged-usr-via-symlinks has caused the Debian Bug report #923091, regarding base-installer: Allow installing w/o the broken merged-usr-via-symlinks to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 923091: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923091 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: base-installer Version: 1.187 Severity: wishlist Hi! The current base-installer uses the default debootstrap settings which end up unconditionally installing systems with the merged-usr-via-symlinks deployment method which is broken by design, please see: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/02/msg00251.html> I'm aware the original request to change the debootstrap default got unfortunately moved to the tech-ctte. :( But regardless of that outcome I'd like to request to have a way to install using debootstrap's --no-merged-usr option, to not have to install from stretch and then upgrade to buster, or having to drop into a shell and do manual stuff from within the installer. In addition it would be also nice if that option was passed whenever /usr is not on its own partition, because then the properties from the merged-/usr concept are not relevant anymore, but we get all the downsides of the broken deployment method. If this was to be applied for buster, I'd be happy to provide patches. Otherwise I guess I might need to end up looking to generate alternative netinst somewhere else or something. :( Thanks, Guillem --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 03:10:17AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > I'm aware the original request to change the debootstrap default got > unfortunately moved to the tech-ctte. :( And ctte made an decision. So there is no bug here. Closing. Bastian -- Violence in reality is quite different from theory. -- Spock, "The Cloud Minders", stardate 5818.4--- End Message ---
Processed: reassign 1066826 to wnpp, reassign 1060763 to src:linux, reassign 1067054 to src:linux ...
: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067105 1067107: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067107 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1065807: marked as done (installation-reports: Verify Installtion Media Fails)
Your message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2024 16:37:05 + with message-id <20240311163705.gg1697...@tack.einval.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1065807: installation-reports: Verify Installtion Media Fails has caused the Debian Bug report #1065807, regarding installation-reports: Verify Installtion Media Fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1065807: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065807 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: tombrown9...@gmail.com (Please provide enough information to help the Debian maintainers evaluate the report efficiently - e.g., by filling in the sections below.) Boot method: USB Image version: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso- cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso 2024-03-07 Date: 3/9/24 Machine: Lenovo Thinkcenter Partitions: Failed be being set Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O ] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect media: [ O] Load installer modules: [ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: It always detects a file corruption. I verified hash on download and verified good usb stick. Same usb was used to install Debian 12 after, which correctly verified. -- Package-specific info: == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="13 (trixie) - installer build 20240214-09:04:17" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux debian 6.6.15-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.6.15-2 (2024-02-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th Gen Core Processor Host Bridge/DRAM Registers [8086:5914] (rev 08) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation UHD Graphics 620 [8086:5917] (rev 07) lspci -knn: DeviceName: Onboard IGD lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: 00:04.0 Signal processing controller [1180]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500 v5/6th Gen Core Processor Thermal Subsystem [8086:1903] (rev 08) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: 00:13.0 Non-VGA unclassified device []: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP Integrated Sensor Hub [8086:9d35] (rev 21) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: intel_ish_ipc lspci -knn: Kernel modules: intel_ish_ipc lspci -knn: 00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP USB 3.0 xHCI Controller [8086:9d2f] (rev 21) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: xhci_hcd lspci -knn: Kernel modules: xhci_pci lspci -knn: 00:14.2 Signal processing controller [1180]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP Thermal subsystem [8086:9d31] (rev 21) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: 00:15.0 Signal processing controller [1180]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP Serial IO I2C Controller #0 [8086:9d60] (rev 21) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: intel-lpss lspci -knn: Kernel modules: intel_lpss_pci lspci -knn: 00:15.1 Signal processing controller [1180]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP Serial IO I2C Controller #1 [8086:9d61] (rev 21) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: intel-lpss lspci -knn: Kernel modules: intel_lpss_pci lspci -knn: 00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP CSME HECI #1 [8086:9d3a] (rev 21) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: 00:17.0 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [8086:9d03] (rev 21) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:07ec] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ahci lspci -knn: Kernel modules: ahci lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP PCI
Bug#784755: marked as done (network-console: Crops password after first space)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:38:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#784755: fixed in network-console 1.95 has caused the Debian Bug report #784755, regarding network-console: Crops password after first space to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 784755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784755 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: network-console Severity: important Hi! I have a jessie d-i here (some rc only, but I don't see any relevant changes since then) and it seems the password for the networkconsole user is cropped after the first space when entering into the d-i dialog? Regards Christoph -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: network-console Source-Version: 1.95 Done: Colin Watson We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of network-console, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 784...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson (supplier of updated network-console package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:16:14 + Source: network-console Architecture: source Version: 1.95 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Colin Watson Closes: 784755 1065675 Changes: network-console (1.95) unstable; urgency=medium . * Generate an Ed25519 SSH host key instead of RSA (closes: #1065675). Also strip down sshd_config a bit so that we only specify things that are either non-default or worth explicitly specifying anyway. * Fix password quoting when generating /etc/shadow entries (closes: #784755). Checksums-Sha1: a11039c57f9bae331b0a06be360bc1649e37edbb 1773 network-console_1.95.dsc 356dfb8518e102f7e3dc109c07651f93c922e311 101448 network-console_1.95.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 3109bc4e450d89ea3e3e9b363aafd9ab95e25d5a2b34ce87478eb39770c1e8c2 1773 network-console_1.95.dsc d39d5de9321269e6d37e97a418b1e57ff550d2ec3a037354c4196a085b4b2017 101448 network-console_1.95.tar.xz Files: e3ac1a70f34e0a447e6901fa11333bd7 1773 debian-installer optional network-console_1.95.dsc 6a63b8e4974f264ad6fc9567095a2bdf 101448 debian-installer optional network-console_1.95.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEErApP8SYRtvzPAcEROTWH2X2GUAsFAmXtwxsACgkQOTWH2X2G UAs4aw//a0ju/k1EIeXgK67iW+BYn0W28rUd0vR4HoY74v7rupaC4l300qYmPclU BkjLmOE8M/MZaf9Khh/9wJEYmVSWdco+XnyABLxxqgSxBLR65mgUIPFfn5uKcv0y yglzqq+boFok504sA26IE6B5eUr3HoGFraa/rvgIdVUFmEGcrE/vJqK/0vuwsF5K N9EoxJ6LcDGxA3kkQljcMwZGbQsNFbaDtqGCb/38wdHPwZa7DqSS6t5cHoxX2Jbx /6PepyGe/863gMMYljGHd7znX8+O1lMk1C2TDtNIiiT7V67gQlro7jqvF9IktDRj zrK70+y8PDn3k3anyfzQb9uq0xPjeQMY5fUKrQzOQHmEKj7tICqA7Ovk7ZwdWQPY V4zX76csCxyCgIYh8qdMeavawmZdyaIVnW5B/UJyhi7Cjs559J4acmgyViygH5X0 lMW8s9UejQWCu/u78YOot1ob/bd7GlaD2aMhmYU6hopyGcSdhAVlJPf2+RCWqOKv LSlzSqn5vBcrhXB4cL6KDv9rnpy3bTOqmuWANfEDLPaVGBSCbv3A5TKF5tOVnoU1 l8hhhm/vNOekQd+hQ/jdKgd5M9mpD28on+s07lBlQhhpszsIEorbiRfo/lv0npqI OnIi1NvHAxcIeFExhigjmXZkdq2uAabTufomfCeTLVvTeSUtFHc= =w+lz -END PGP SIGNATURE- pgpJdnmkAnX2m.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#1065675: marked as done (network-console: Allow ED25519 host keys)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:38:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065675: fixed in network-console 1.95 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065675, regarding network-console: Allow ED25519 host keys to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1065675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065675 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: network-console Version: 1.93 Severity: wishlist Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: 0cf13...@lf.nx.tc --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: network-console Source-Version: 1.95 Done: Colin Watson We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of network-console, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1065...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson (supplier of updated network-console package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:16:14 + Source: network-console Architecture: source Version: 1.95 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Colin Watson Closes: 784755 1065675 Changes: network-console (1.95) unstable; urgency=medium . * Generate an Ed25519 SSH host key instead of RSA (closes: #1065675). Also strip down sshd_config a bit so that we only specify things that are either non-default or worth explicitly specifying anyway. * Fix password quoting when generating /etc/shadow entries (closes: #784755). Checksums-Sha1: a11039c57f9bae331b0a06be360bc1649e37edbb 1773 network-console_1.95.dsc 356dfb8518e102f7e3dc109c07651f93c922e311 101448 network-console_1.95.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 3109bc4e450d89ea3e3e9b363aafd9ab95e25d5a2b34ce87478eb39770c1e8c2 1773 network-console_1.95.dsc d39d5de9321269e6d37e97a418b1e57ff550d2ec3a037354c4196a085b4b2017 101448 network-console_1.95.tar.xz Files: e3ac1a70f34e0a447e6901fa11333bd7 1773 debian-installer optional network-console_1.95.dsc 6a63b8e4974f264ad6fc9567095a2bdf 101448 debian-installer optional network-console_1.95.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEErApP8SYRtvzPAcEROTWH2X2GUAsFAmXtwxsACgkQOTWH2X2G UAs4aw//a0ju/k1EIeXgK67iW+BYn0W28rUd0vR4HoY74v7rupaC4l300qYmPclU BkjLmOE8M/MZaf9Khh/9wJEYmVSWdco+XnyABLxxqgSxBLR65mgUIPFfn5uKcv0y yglzqq+boFok504sA26IE6B5eUr3HoGFraa/rvgIdVUFmEGcrE/vJqK/0vuwsF5K N9EoxJ6LcDGxA3kkQljcMwZGbQsNFbaDtqGCb/38wdHPwZa7DqSS6t5cHoxX2Jbx /6PepyGe/863gMMYljGHd7znX8+O1lMk1C2TDtNIiiT7V67gQlro7jqvF9IktDRj zrK70+y8PDn3k3anyfzQb9uq0xPjeQMY5fUKrQzOQHmEKj7tICqA7Ovk7ZwdWQPY V4zX76csCxyCgIYh8qdMeavawmZdyaIVnW5B/UJyhi7Cjs559J4acmgyViygH5X0 lMW8s9UejQWCu/u78YOot1ob/bd7GlaD2aMhmYU6hopyGcSdhAVlJPf2+RCWqOKv LSlzSqn5vBcrhXB4cL6KDv9rnpy3bTOqmuWANfEDLPaVGBSCbv3A5TKF5tOVnoU1 l8hhhm/vNOekQd+hQ/jdKgd5M9mpD28on+s07lBlQhhpszsIEorbiRfo/lv0npqI OnIi1NvHAxcIeFExhigjmXZkdq2uAabTufomfCeTLVvTeSUtFHc= =w+lz -END PGP SIGNATURE- pgprYf_2pJakk.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Processed: Bug#784755 marked as pending in network-console
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #784755 [network-console] network-console: Crops password after first space Added tag(s) pending. -- 784755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784755 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Bug#1065675 marked as pending in network-console
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1065675 [src:network-console] network-console: Allow ED25519 host keys Added tag(s) pending. -- 1065675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065675 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Bug#1065570 marked as pending in installation-guide
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1065570 [installation-guide] Interface border is replaced by ascii chars Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1065570 to the same tags previously set -- 1065570: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 1065570
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1065570 + pending Bug #1065570 [installation-guide] Interface border is replaced by ascii chars Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1065570: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: reassign 1065570 to installation-guide
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1065570 installation-guide Bug #1065570 [console-setup] Interface border is replaced by ascii chars Bug reassigned from package 'console-setup' to 'installation-guide'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1065570 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1065570 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1065570: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1065561: console-setup: typos in documentation
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1065561 [src:console-setup] console-setup: typos in documentation Added tag(s) pending. -- 1065561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065561 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1065570: Interface border is replaced by ascii chars
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 console-setup Bug #1065570 [debian-installer] Interface border is replaced by ascii chars Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'console-setup'. No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/20230607+deb12u5. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1065570 to the same values previously set > tags -1 + d-i Bug #1065570 [console-setup] Interface border is replaced by ascii chars Added tag(s) d-i. -- 1065570: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: reassign 1065343 to libuuid1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1065343 libuuid1t64 Bug #1065343 [debootstrap] E: Tried to extract package, but file already exists. Exit... Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'libuuid1t64'. No longer marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.134~bpo12+1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1065343 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1065343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065343 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#769738: marked as done (debian-installer: Please automatically mount /usr in rescue mode)
Your message dated Sat, 2 Mar 2024 15:42:38 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: #769738: split usr is unsupported has caused the Debian Bug report #769738, regarding debian-installer: Please automatically mount /usr in rescue mode to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 769738: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769738 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Rescue mode currently asks the user if she wants to mount a separate /boot partition. The same should probably happen for /usr. Preferably, this could be automatically detected (empty dirs and/or entries in fstab in target?) Thanks, Christian --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Looks like my old report became obsolete.--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1065033: debootstrap: Fails for *sid* with `cannot move /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpam.so.0 as its destination exists as a symlink`
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1065033 src:pam Bug #1065033 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Fails for *sid* with `cannot move /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpam.so.0 as its destination exists as a symlink` Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'src:pam'. No longer marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.134. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1065033 to the same values previously set > forcemerge 1065011 1065033 Bug #1065011 [src:pam] libpam0t64 competes for libpam.so.0 symlink against libpam0g (breaks debootstrap) Bug #1065033 [src:pam] debootstrap: Fails for *sid* with `cannot move /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpam.so.0 as its destination exists as a symlink` Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' Marked as found in versions pam/1.5.3-4. Merged 1065011 1065033 > affects 1065033 debootstrap Bug #1065033 [src:pam] debootstrap: Fails for *sid* with `cannot move /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpam.so.0 as its destination exists as a symlink` Bug #1065011 [src:pam] libpam0t64 competes for libpam.so.0 symlink against libpam0g (breaks debootstrap) Added indication that 1065033 affects debootstrap Added indication that 1065011 affects debootstrap > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1065011: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065011 1065033: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065033 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 1061238
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1061238 + patch Bug #1061238 [src:discover] discover: install binaries into /usr Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1061238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061238 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 953861 1.0.134 Bug #953861 [debootstrap] debootstrap: buildd variant uselessly includes libgcc1 Marked as fixed in versions debootstrap/1.0.134. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 953861: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953861 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 942875 moreinfo Bug #942875 [debootstrap] debootstrap does not overwrite existing files even if adviced to do Added tag(s) moreinfo. > fixed 953861 1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1 Bug #953861 [debootstrap] debootstrap: buildd variant uselessly includes libgcc1 Marked as fixed in versions debootstrap/1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1. > found 1024870 1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1 Bug #1024870 [debootstrap] Scenario in which --extra-suites leads to breakage Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1. > found 1024870 1.0.134 Bug #1024870 [debootstrap] Scenario in which --extra-suites leads to breakage Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.134. > tags 891009 pending Bug #891009 [debootstrap] debootstrap: wrongly falls back to https://deb.debian.org when try to create Ubuntu chroot Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1024870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024870 891009: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891009 942875: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942875 953861: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953861 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 731859 1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1 Bug #731859 [debootstrap] debootstrap: variant=fakechroot fails Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1. > fixed 731859 1.0.134 Bug #731859 [debootstrap] debootstrap: variant=fakechroot fails Marked as fixed in versions debootstrap/1.0.134. > fixed 1035567 1.0.134 Bug #1035567 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Does not support APT repositories with modern split arch:all support Marked as fixed in versions debootstrap/1.0.134. > found 891009 1.0.56 Bug #891009 [debootstrap] debootstrap: wrongly falls back to https://deb.debian.org when try to create Ubuntu chroot Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.56. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1035567: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035567 731859: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731859 891009: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891009 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 1006454 1.0.123+deb11u2 Bug #1006454 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Ubuntu 20 creation fails on passwd configuration Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1006454 to the same values previously set > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1006454: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006454 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed (with 2 errors): your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 819300 891009 Bug #819300 [debootstrap] should provide default HTTPS mirrors for non-Debian releases too Unable to merge bugs because: severity of #891009 is 'normal' not 'wishlist' Failed to merge 819300: Did not alter merged bugs. > notfound 1.0.123+deb11u2 1006454 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 819300: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819300 891009: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891009 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: di-utils: chroot-setup.sh creates ineffective diversions (DEP17)
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + dpkg Bug #1063878 [di-utils] di-utils: chroot-setup.sh creates ineffective diversions (DEP17) Added indication that 1063878 affects dpkg -- 1063878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063878 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1063413: marked as done (FTBFS: cannot open /<>/Keyboard/pc105.ekbd: No such file)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Feb 2024 13:32:13 +0100 with message-id <20240211133213.1096c5547204d11da4759...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1063413: FTBFS: cannot open /<>/Keyboard/pc105.ekbd: No such file has caused the Debian Bug report #1063413, regarding FTBFS: cannot open /<>/Keyboard/pc105.ekbd: No such file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063413: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063413 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: console-setup Version: 1.224 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: sid trixie ftbfs Dear Maintainer, console-setup 1.224 fails to build from source with the following error: Dumping the encoded keymaps for pc105... WARNING: Can not find "caps_switch" in "group". WARNING: Can not find "caps_toggle" in "group". gzip -9n >/Keyboard/pc105.ekbd >/<>/Keyboard/pc105.ekbd.gz /bin/sh: 1: cannot open /<>/Keyboard/pc105.ekbd: No such file make[1]: *** [rules.mk:17: /<>/Keyboard/pc105.ekbd.gz] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>' make: *** [debian/rules:204: udeb-install] Error 2 Version 1.223 builds fine in unstable instead. Perhaps this is related to the fact that 1.224 dropped the binary package console-setup-pc-ekbd? --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.225 Emanuele Rocca wrote (Thu, 8 Feb 2024 15:25:50 +0100): > Hi, > > On 2024-02-08 02:06, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:13:01PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > Am 7. Februar 2024 21:55:05 MEZ schrieb Emanuele Rocca : > > > >Perhaps this is related to the fact that 1.224 dropped the binary > > > >package console-setup-pc-ekbd? > > > > > > What makes you think, that this has happened? > > > > > > There is a merge request that includes the removal of said package, > > > but it has not yet been merged. > > Looks like the change has been uploaded though, there is no > console-setup-pc-ekbd here: > https://sources.debian.org/src/console-setup/1.224/debian/control/ > > But on 1.223 it's there: > https://sources.debian.org/src/console-setup/1.223/debian/control/#L161 > > > My inclination is to upload 1.225 without that patch for now, as we need > > to rebuild for the new xkb-data to sort out uninstallability in > > unstable, and then get the kFreeBSD-removal patch sorted out after that. > > Objections? This was fixed by a clean upload of 1.225 without said changings. Thanks everybody Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#848972: Fixed in Ubuntu
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #848972 [console-setup-linux] console-setup-linux: Datei /tmp/tmpkbd.BRzn8j kann nicht geöffnet werden Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #848972 to the same tags previously set -- 848972: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848972 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1051846: marked as done (installation-reports: gnome_flashback installation fails on openQA with daily netinst image)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:25:50 +0100 with message-id <20240211122550.3ac4259eb265e31ec44cf...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1051846: installation-reports: gnome_flashback installation fails on openQA with daily netinst image has caused the Debian Bug report #1051846, regarding installation-reports: gnome_flashback installation fails on openQA with daily netinst image to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1051846: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051846 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@hands.com Boot method: CD netinst image Image version: https://get.debian.org/images/daily-builds/daily/arch- latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso from 20230913_0524 Date: Machine: QEMU with UEFI secure boot as on openqa.debian.net, 2GB memory Partitions: wipe all from a 10GB virtual HD Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect media: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: The installation proceeds without error. After rebooting, the screen with 'Oh no! Something has gone wrong' is shown. My attempts to reproduce and pinpoint the cause: I've tested with QXL and VGA graphical cards on openQA. In both cases the 'Oh no!' is shown. With the netinst image from 20230909_0504, the flashback GUI started initially with the grey top menu bar, but that got replaced by the black menu bar of the regular GNOME desktop. The last known good netinst image was from 20230910_0509. The first netinst image with this issue is from 20230910_1109. This narrows down the number of possible causes a bit. To see more installation attempts (every 6 hours): * Go to https://openqa.debian.net/group_overview/10 * Take a build that has no running jobs (i.e. no blue bar) * Click on the red part of the bar * Click on the red circle behind 'gnome_flash_flash' (before '_graphical_wait_login' or 'complete_install') * Installation logs and additional information can be found in the 'Logs & Assets' tab of the test With kind regards, Roland Clobus -- Package-specific info: == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="7 (wheezy) - installer build 20130613+deb7u2+b1" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=netboot == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux silent 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.57-3 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Haswell DRAM Controller [8086:0c00] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5000] lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Haswell Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0412] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:d000] lspci -knn: 00:03.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation Haswell HD Audio Controller [8086:0c0c] (rev 06) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:2010] lspci -knn: 00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation Lynx Point USB xHCI Host Controller [8086:8c31] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:5007] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: xhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation Lynx Point MEI Controller #1 [8086:8c3a] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:1c3a] lspci -knn: 00:16.3 Serial controller [0700]: Intel Corporation Lynx Point KT Controller [8086:8c3d] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:1c3a] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: serial lspci -knn: 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection I217-V [8086:153b] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:e000] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: e1000e lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation Lynx Point USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 [8086:8c2d] (rev 04) lspci
Processed: reassign 1052763 to src:gnuastro, fixed 1052763 in 0.22-1, reassign 1062350 to src:gnuastro ...
ase contact me if you need assistance. -- 141: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=141 147: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=147 165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=165 1000100: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000100 1000112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000112 1000115: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000115 1018125: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018125 1024182: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024182 1025084: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025084 1025092: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025092 1028483: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028483 1029451: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029451 1037597: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037597 1042344: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042344 1044060: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1044060 1044425: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1044425 1052763: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052763 1052901: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052901 1053334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053334 1053955: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053955 1054407: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054407 1054681: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054681 1055227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055227 1056363: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056363 1056419: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056419 1056793: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056793 1057185: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057185 1057186: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057186 1057447: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057447 1057717: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057717 1058102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058102 1058311: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058311 1058327: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058327 1059168: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059168 1059495: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059495 1059671: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059671 1060076: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060076 1061205: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061205 1061426: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061426 1061464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061464 1061605: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061605 1061631: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061631 1061633: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061633 1061760: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061760 1062350: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062350 1062353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062353 1063202: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063202 1063254: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063254 1063274: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063274 1063281: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063281 106: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=106 1063498: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063498 1063499: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063499 1063645: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063645 885563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885563 918984: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918984 949767: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949767 976540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976540 984816: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984816 89: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=89 90: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=90 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1063518: marked as done (console-setup: setupcon: 1386: Syntax error: Missing '))')
Your message dated Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:34:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1063518: fixed in console-setup 1.226
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063518,
regarding console-setup: setupcon: 1386: Syntax error: Missing '))'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1063518: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063518
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.225
Severity: grave
After the upgrade from 1.223, console-setup.service failed to start due
to a syntax error in the setupcon script:
,
| $ setupcon
| /usr/bin/setupcon: 1386: Syntax error: Missing '))'
`
It looks like dash does not like the construct in line 907 where there
is an opening '$((' but the closing parentheses are split.
,
| $ dash << 'EOF'
| > echo $((true))
| > echo $((true) )
| > EOF
| 0
| dash: 3: Syntax error: Missing '))'
| $
`
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: console-setup
Source-Version: 1.226
Done: Philip Hands
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
console-setup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 1063...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Philip Hands (supplier of updated console-setup package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:45:38 +0100
Source: console-setup
Architecture: source
Version: 1.226
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Philip Hands
Closes: 1063518
Changes:
console-setup (1.226) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload
.
* setupcon: fix mistaken $(( (closes: 1063518)
Checksums-Sha1:
84294e5b75b00aad2cced6b0cfab0635682b6c3e 3340 console-setup_1.226.dsc
ff1036c7201a486a791040148128711a5a746106 1685272 console-setup_1.226.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
25d949da1eb3e494bed1f3fc11074c5221ce54bd1463963b0b9417b9b89922f9 3340
console-setup_1.226.dsc
992be8dfcc5b99c42cb0f2914d987298e281e9232eb2492302d97dc3ff6412bd 1685272
console-setup_1.226.tar.xz
Files:
82130112e2f68bcbbe925f8d337b7acd 3340 utils optional console-setup_1.226.dsc
81e55c7e628e52eeb52efa6cbaeeb03f 1685272 utils optional
console-setup_1.226.tar.xz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-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=YBWD
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#1019660: marked as done (console-setup: grep: warning: stray \ before #)
Your message dated Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:56:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1019660: fixed in console-setup 1.225 has caused the Debian Bug report #1019660, regarding console-setup: grep: warning: stray \ before # to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1019660: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019660 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: console-setup Version: 1.210 Severity: minor Control: affects -1 + initramfs-tools With grep (>= 3.8), I'm getting this warning: # setupcon grep: warning: stray \ before # -- System Information: Architecture: i386 Versions of packages console-setup depends on: ii debconf 1.5.79 ii console-setup-linux 1.210 ii xkb-data2.35.1-1 ii keyboard-configuration 1.210 -- Jakub Wilk --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: console-setup Source-Version: 1.225 Done: Holger Wansing We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of console-setup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1019...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Holger Wansing (supplier of updated console-setup package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 22:42:09 +0100 Source: console-setup Architecture: source Version: 1.225 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Holger Wansing Closes: 1019660 Changes: console-setup (1.225) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload . [ Philip Hands ] * eliminate use of egrep and \# (closes: #1019660) . [ Updated translations ] * Catalan (ca.po) by d * Norwegian Bokmal (nb.po) by Petter Reinholdtsen * Polish (pl.po) by Matthaiks * Swedish (sv.po) by bittin1ddc447d824349b2 * Turkish (tr.po) by Oğuz Ersen * Ukrainian (uk.po) by Сергій Checksums-Sha1: 8f19d4132fe506b0b3b5ecb715a9bdc4d67de245 3231 console-setup_1.225.dsc dada9212126c4542fd3f41d1cb48a8fca2c97ded 2598072 console-setup_1.225.tar.xz 67f80729ccb58ef48503bd48f0ff39fcf8196dec 19505 console-setup_1.225_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 4c5e82e01c266f4dda769d49df754864e7b2f897f94df352bad4cde368a6c7ed 3231 console-setup_1.225.dsc 7a22d8db70a55900bb1824a415b9fd5ea633e20aa8f89a72ad95c89c2856aabe 2598072 console-setup_1.225.tar.xz a53db79e58e45e369d5b2e06e8b52672318b0baf0a8769f7baae7d447d89f3bc 19505 console-setup_1.225_amd64.buildinfo Files: 1f4b5cc6ee9a529e257ab73ac52dc156 3231 utils optional console-setup_1.225.dsc bf5335c97d68624d1c239ec331098729 2598072 utils optional console-setup_1.225.tar.xz 9c137c0529d35716ef623e236edae99b 19505 utils optional console-setup_1.225_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJJBAEBCgAzFiEESWrG6BRCSzSFCDUpWfGHyhVusHYFAmXFULYVHGh3YW5zaW5n QG1haWxib3gub3JnAAoJEFnxh8oVbrB2Fx4P/j2wYCYxmAWjYfyC/bbTMTTKUuUm GBp/Qwy+8+yYZtMPGaod6E4/ezopPv6Eco7Y3IRT90l1hPCMEjnIylIjnOHRf6KN D+Dhv/yZBD0CDZHWu+7alnNQfCtVJ1m72Z9N+zjLyTHAARnMltL6WnnQpZi4BnJa Vdn0U55bXCeUkw+71OcxZPn4ckmqOEVM3gxb1O2FxHMges3YFkmg/atImQnwLcCY NkMFalG2LWKgIXLX6TofTHyAMvgoIpcdOX+jrzJIcIQvnofFeHIZNaxlx8nvY54Y W/1gFqso5XaL8TGxvI0mnRRIlxo/vXqHtrtkUl1lA8Vm4z+ubG0/iRL5s1QJd1kA xnxm/d9FyNafEmQDvj89OejOqLwXS+HpGwwNtA4jIzauPdkWw9Bgmk7UY7c3uEyN 1W7R/KXLM91YYA2i7D06r8dMhf1jIiPrWjLdaGQFu52Y5/qARErdniDsh8AUG+EF ilWfhi7VeK3bWwMSNL8PgFllQ219AvytIiiagbZ/qzLdnQXDkMuq0ocrsZ1+Lrl7 5FJk1nyWPY488yZmMNsVc4F4/1kdob7I6ce134fp0kLSkA+R1pJQ7oAw9EhvIbT1 1YV33ostgFQArSZlnu73HcVmD8oJvFcc+rYXOGmQBXmXCsn2INp4VddO8BtENUIG bD6aXWn9estgrPZg =mLbG -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#1062333: marked as done (discover: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)
Your message dated Mon, 5 Feb 2024 20:45:36 -0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: discover: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062333,
regarding discover: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1062333: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062333
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: discover
Version: 2.1.2-10
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
(https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified
discover as a source package shipping runtime libraries whose ABI
either is affected by the change in size of time_t, or could not be
analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and therefore to be on the safe
side we assume is affected).
To ensure that inconsistent combinations of libraries with their
reverse-dependencies are never installed together, it is necessary to
have a library transition, which is most easily done by renaming the
runtime library package.
Since turning on 64-bit time_t is being handled centrally through a change
to the default dpkg-buildflags (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), it is
important that libraries affected by this ABI change all be uploaded close
together in time. Therefore I have prepared a 0-day NMU for discover
which will initially be uploaded to experimental if possible, then to
unstable after packages have cleared binary NEW.
Please find the patch for this NMU attached.
If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although
this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information
becomes available that your package should not be included in the transition,
there is time for us to amend the planned uploads.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-15-generic (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru discover-2.1.2/debian/changelog discover-2.1.2/debian/changelog
--- discover-2.1.2/debian/changelog 2022-01-09 07:48:08.0 +
+++ discover-2.1.2/debian/changelog 2024-02-01 04:30:47.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+discover (2.1.2-10.1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Thu, 01 Feb 2024 04:30:47 +
+
discover (2.1.2-10) unstable; urgency=medium
* Modernize packaging a little:
diff -Nru discover-2.1.2/debian/control discover-2.1.2/debian/control
--- discover-2.1.2/debian/control 2022-01-09 07:30:59.0 +
+++ discover-2.1.2/debian/control 2024-02-01 04:30:46.0 +
@@ -10,17 +10,20 @@
Package: discover
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libdiscover2 (= ${binary:Version})
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libdiscover2t64 (=
${binary:Version})
Suggests: lsb-base
Conflicts: discover1 (<< 2.0)
Description: hardware identification system
- Discover is a hardware identification system based on the libdiscover2
+ Discover is a hardware identification system based on the libdiscover2t64
library. Discover provides a flexible interface that programs can
use to report a wide range of information about the hardware that is
installed on a Linux system. In addition to reporting information,
Discover includes support for doing hardware detection at boot time.
-Package: libdiscover2
+Package: libdiscover2t64
+Provides: ${t64:Provides}
+Replaces: libdiscover2
+Breaks: libdiscover2 (<< ${source:Version})
Section: libs
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, discover-data (>> 2.2004.04)
@@ -32,7 +35,7 @@
Package: libdiscover-dev
Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libdiscover2 (= ${binary:Version}), libexpat1-dev
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libdiscover2t64 (= ${binary:Version}), libexpat1-dev
Description: hardware identification library development files
libdis
Processed (with 2 errors): your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1032530 moreinfo Bug #1032530 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Unable to debootstrap Ubuntu 22.04 (jammy) Added tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 935334 moreinfo Bug #935334 [debootstrap] debootstrap: man page says that --include will add package to download and extract list, but an experiment shows opposite Added tag(s) moreinfo. > forwarded 974084 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/merge_requests/50 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags 940183 moreinfo Bug #940183 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Cannot deboostrap an i386/amd64 foreign system from a ppc64le host Added tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 983494 moreinfo Bug #983494 [debootstrap] arch-test breaks debootstrap into empty chroot Added tag(s) moreinfo. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1032530: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032530 935334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935334 940183: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940183 983494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 1061866, tagging 1061872, tagging 1061873, tagging 1061874, tagging 1061875, tagging 1061878 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1061866 + sid trixie
Bug #1061866 [src:adns] adns: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061872 + sid trixie
Bug #1061872 [src:adolc] adolc: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061873 + sid trixie
Bug #1061873 [src:afflib] afflib: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061874 + sid trixie
Bug #1061874 [src:colpack] colpack: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061875 + sid trixie
Bug #1061875 [src:afterstep] afterstep: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061878 + sid trixie
Bug #1061878 [src:agg] agg: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061881 + sid trixie
Bug #1061881 [src:akonadi-search] akonadi-search: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061883 + sid trixie
Bug #1061883 [src:alberta] alberta: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061889 + sid trixie
Bug #1061889 [src:angelscript] angelscript: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061890 + sid trixie
Bug #1061890 [src:anthy] anthy: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061891 + sid trixie
Bug #1061891 [src:apbs] apbs: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061892 + sid trixie
Bug #1061892 [src:apophenia] apophenia: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061893 + sid trixie
Bug #1061893 [src:apr-util] apr-util: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061894 + sid trixie
Bug #1061894 [src:apr] apr: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061897 + sid trixie
Bug #1061897 [src:aribb24] aribb24: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061900 + sid trixie
Bug #1061900 [src:comedilib] comedilib: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061901 + sid trixie
Bug #1061901 [src:compiz] compiz: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061903 + sid trixie
Bug #1061903 [src:coolkey] coolkey: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061905 + sid trixie
Bug #1061905 [src:cpp-hocon] cpp-hocon: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061908 + sid trixie
Bug #1061908 [src:cppdb] cppdb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061909 + sid trixie
Bug #1061909 [src:croaring] croaring: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061911 + sid trixie
Bug #1061911 [src:csmith] csmith: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061913 + sid trixie
Bug #1061913 [src:ctpl] ctpl: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061914 + sid trixie
Bug #1061914 [src:cuneiform] cuneiform: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061915 + sid trixie
Bug #1061915 [src:cups-filters] cups-filters: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061921 + sid trixie
Bug #1061921 [src:asl] asl: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061922 + sid trixie
Bug #1061922 [src:astrometry.net] astrometry.net: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061928 + sid trixie
Bug #1061928 [src:avro-c] avro-c: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061929 + sid trixie
Bug #1061929 [src:bamf] bamf: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061932 + sid trixie
Bug #1061932 [src:blitz++] blitz++: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061934 + sid trixie
Bug #1061934 [src:boinc] boinc: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061943 + sid trixie
Bug #1061943 [src:forge] forge: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061945 + sid trixie
Bug #1061945 [src:fpgatools] fpgatools: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061953 + sid trixie
Bug #1061953 [src:freewnn] freewnn: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1061954 + sid trixie
Bug #1061954 [src:frog] frog: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061955 + sid trixie
Bug #1061955 [src:fsplib] fsplib: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061957 + sid trixie
Bug #1061957 [src:funtools] funtools: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1061961 + sid trixie
Bug #1061961 {Done: Bas Couwenberg } [src:fyba] fyba: NMU
diff for 64-bit
Processed: Bug#1061820 marked as pending in debootstrap
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1061820 [debootstrap] debootstrap fails if target has spaces Added tag(s) pending. -- 1061820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061820 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1061820 1.0.123+deb11u1 Bug #1061820 [debootstrap] debootstrap fails if target has spaces Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.123+deb11u1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1061820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061820 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1061820 1.0.134 Bug #1061820 [debootstrap] debootstrap fails if target has spaces Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.134. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1061820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061820 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1051968: marked as done (please make task-mate-desktop install libreoffice-gnome)
Your message dated Sat, 27 Jan 2024 21:43:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1051968: fixed in tasksel 3.74 has caused the Debian Bug report #1051968, regarding please make task-mate-desktop install libreoffice-gnome to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1051968: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051968 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libreoffice Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, (Sorry if wrong pkg; had trouble finding dependency Also, yes, I used the term "patch" very loosely.) Problem: Fresh debian installation includes LibreOffice, but when installed in the MATE environment, it installs the libreoffice-gtk package but does NOT install the libreoffice-gnome package. How I noticed: LO was unable to open e.g. "sftp://; files. If opened from LO, it was as if you hit ESC instead of ENTER on open dialog -- nothing happened. If opened from file browser (Caja), it launched LO which then immediately exited. How I fixed: Manually installed libreoffice-gnome I don't know where to go to tweak this in the distro, but I suspect you do! Thanks for reading my report. -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.0 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-10-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages libreoffice depends on: pn libreoffice-base ii libreoffice-calc4:7.4.7-1 ii libreoffice-core4:7.4.7-1 ii libreoffice-draw4:7.4.7-1 ii libreoffice-impress 4:7.4.7-1 ii libreoffice-math4:7.4.7-1 pn libreoffice-report-builder-bin ii libreoffice-writer 4:7.4.7-1 ii python3-uno 4:7.4.7-1 Versions of packages libreoffice recommends: pn fonts-crosextra-caladea pn fonts-crosextra-carlito ii fonts-dejavu2.37-6 pn fonts-liberation ii fonts-liberation2 2.1.5-1 pn fonts-linuxlibertine pn fonts-noto-core pn fonts-noto-extra ii fonts-noto-mono 20201225-1 pn fonts-noto-ui-core pn fonts-sil-gentium-basic pn libreoffice-java-common pn libreoffice-nlpsolver pn libreoffice-report-builder pn libreoffice-script-provider-bsh pn libreoffice-script-provider-js pn libreoffice-script-provider-python pn libreoffice-sdbc-mysql pn libreoffice-sdbc-postgresql pn libreoffice-wiki-publisher Versions of packages libreoffice suggests: pn cups-bsd pn default-jre | java-runtime | java8-runtime | jre ii firefox-esr 102.13.0esr-1~deb12u1 ii ghostscript 10.0.0~dfsg-11+deb12u1 ii gnupg 2.2.40-1.1 pn gpa ii gstreamer1.0-libav1.22.0-2 ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad 1.22.0-4+deb12u1 ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-base 1.22.0-3+deb12u1 ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-good 1.22.0-5+deb12u1 ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly 1.22.0-2 ii hunspell-en-us [hunspell-dictionary] 1:2020.12.07-2 ii hyphen-en-us [hyphen-hyphenation-patterns]2.8.8-7 pn imagemagick | graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat ii libgl11.6.0-1 pn libofficebean-java ii libreoffice-gnome 4:7.4.7-1 pn libreoffice-grammarcheck ii libreoffice-help-en-us [libreoffice-help] 4:7.4.7-1 pn libreoffice-l10n pn libreoffice-librelogo ii libsane1 1.2.1-2 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.10-1.1 pn myspell-dictionary ii mythes-en-us [mythes-thesaurus] 1:7.5.0-1 pn openclip
Processed: reassign 864480 to localechooser, forcibly merging 842630 864480
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 864480 localechooser Bug #864480 [locales] why is en_DK included but not en_DE? Bug reassigned from package 'locales' to 'localechooser'. No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.24-11. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #864480 to the same values previously set > forcemerge 842630 864480 Bug #842630 [localechooser] localechooser: Should support separating language from localization Bug #847056 [localechooser] debian-installer: Installer can't find "en_DK.utf-8" locale Bug #864480 [localechooser] why is en_DK included but not en_DE? Severity set to 'normal' from 'wishlist' Marked as found in versions localechooser/2.69. Added tag(s) d-i and l10n. Bug #847056 [localechooser] debian-installer: Installer can't find "en_DK.utf-8" locale Merged 842630 847056 864480 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 842630: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842630 847056: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847056 864480: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864480 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1061121: di-utils-terminfo: should include xterm-256color terminfo entry
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1061121 [di-utils-terminfo] di-utils-terminfo: should include xterm-256color terminfo entry Added tag(s) patch. -- 1061121: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061121 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: di-utils-terminfo: should include xterm-256color terminfo entry
Processing control commands: > block 887649 by -1 Bug #887649 [cdebconf-gtk-terminal] cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte 887649 was blocked by: 887674 887649 was blocking: 885563 967799 Added blocking bug(s) of 887649: 1061121 -- 1061121: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061121 887649: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887649 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: #1051968please make task-mate-desktop install libreoffice-gnome
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #1051968 [tasksel] please make task-mate-desktop install libreoffice-gnome Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1051968 to the same tags previously set -- 1051968: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051968 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Bug#1051968 marked as pending in tasksel
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1051968 [tasksel] please make task-mate-desktop install libreoffice-gnome Added tag(s) pending. -- 1051968: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051968 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Bug#1051968 marked as pending in tasksel
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1051968 [tasksel] please make task-mate-desktop install libreoffice-gnome Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1051968 to the same tags previously set -- 1051968: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051968 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1060383: marked as done (ERROR UPDATING)
Your message dated Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:34:24 + with message-id <20240110163424.gb2838...@tack.einval.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1060383: ERROR UPDATING has caused the Debian Bug report #1060383, regarding ERROR UPDATING to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1060383: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060383 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: Discover Versione: 5.27.5 Hi to all, I have been experiencing errors when updating the system for a few days now. I attach an info.txt file of my system. thank you Roberto Scaricamento del pacchetto non riuscito:E: http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo bookworm/main amd64 ddm-mx all 23.12.02 is not (yet) available (Impossibile connettersi a mxrepo.com:443 (70.40.214.183). - connect (111: Connessione rifiutata)) E: http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo bookworm/main amd64 firefox amd64 121.0.1~mozillabinaries-1mx23+1 is not (yet) available (Impossibile connettersi a mxrepo.com:https:) E: http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo bookworm/main amd64 firefox-l10n-xpi-it amd64 121.0.1~mozillabinaries-1mx23+1 is not (yet) available (Impossibile connettersi a mxrepo.com:https:) E: https://mxrepo.com/mx/repo bookworm/main amd64 formatusb amd64 24.01.01 is not (yet) available (Impossibile connettersi a mxrepo.com:https:) E: http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo bookworm/main amd64 lo-main-helper all 24.01.3mx23 is not (yet) available (Impossibile connettersi a mxrepo.com:https:) E: http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo bookworm/main amd64 mx-packageinstaller-pkglist all 24.01.3mx23 is not (yet) available (Impossibile connettersi a mxrepo.com:https:) E: https://mxrepo.com/mx/repo bookworm/main amd64 mx-packageinstaller amd64 24.1 is not (yet) available (Impossibile connettersi a mxrepo.com:https:) E: https://mxrepo.com/mx/repo bookworm/main amd64 mx-tweak amd64 24.01.01mx23 is not (yet) available (Impossibile connettersi a mxrepo.com:https:) E: https://mxrepo.com/mx/repo bookworm/main amd64 system-keyboard-qt amd64 24.01.01mx23 is not (yet) available (Impossibile connettersi a mxrepo.com:https:) System: Kernel: 6.1.0-10-amd64 [6.1.38-2] arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 12.2.0 parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.1.0-10-amd64 root=UUID= ro quiet splash Desktop: KDE Plasma v: 5.27.5 wm: kwin_x11 vt: 7 dm: SDDM Distro: MX-23.1_KDE_x64 Libretto July 31 2023 base: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) Machine: Type: Vmware System: VMware product: VMware Virtual Platform v: N/A serial: Chassis: No Enclosure type: 1 serial: Mobo: Intel model: 440BX Desktop Reference Platform serial: BIOS: Phoenix v: 6.00 date: 11/12/2020 CPU: Info: model: AMD Ryzen 5 7530U with Radeon Graphics bits: 64 type: MCP arch: Zen 3 gen: 4 level: v3 note: check built: 2021-22 process: TSMC n7 (7nm) family: 0x19 (25) model-id: 0x50 (80) stepping: 0 microcode: 0x Topology: cpus: 1x cores: 2 smt: cache: L1: 128 KiB desc: d-2x32 KiB; i-2x32 KiB L2: 1024 KiB desc: 2x512 KiB L3: 16 MiB desc: 1x16 MiB Speed (MHz): avg: 1996 min/max: N/A cores: 1: 1996 2: 1996 bogomips: 7984 Flags: avx avx2 ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 sse4a ssse3 Vulnerabilities: Type: itlb_multihit status: Not affected Type: l1tf status: Not affected Type: mds status: Not affected Type: meltdown status: Not affected Type: mmio_stale_data status: Not affected Type: retbleed status: Not affected Type: spec_store_bypass status: Vulnerable Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Retpolines, IBPB: conditional, STIBP: disabled, RSB filling, PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected Type: srbds status: Not affected Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected Graphics: Device-1: VMware SVGA II Adapter driver: vmwgfx v: 2.20.0.0 ports: active: Virtual-1 empty: Virtual-2, Virtual-3, Virtual-4, Virtual-5, Virtual-6, Virtual-7, Virtual-8 bus-ID: 00:0f.0 chip-ID: 15ad:0405 class-ID: 0300 Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.7 with: Xwayland v: 22.1.9 compositor: kwin_x11 driver: X: loaded: vmware unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa dri: swrast gpu: vmwgfx display-ID: :0 screens: 1 Screen-1: 0 s-res: 1920x1080 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 508x285mm (20.00x11.22") s-diag: 582mm (22.93") Monitor-1: Virtual-1 mapped: Virtual1 res: 1920x1080 hz: 60 size: N/A modes: max: 1920x1080 min: 640x480 API: OpenGL v: 4.5 Mesa 23.1.2-1~mx23ahs renderer: llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.6 256 bits) direct-render: Yes Audio: Device-1: Ensoniq ES1371/E
Processed: Re: subj
206 to archive/06 (from 869206) archived 396821 to archive/21 (from 869206) archived 558607 to archive/07 (from 869206) > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1005752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005752 1005760: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005760 1023332: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023332 396821: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=396821 530618: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530618 558607: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558607 574653: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574653 611265: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611265 632627: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632627 632711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632711 659387: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659387 671723: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671723 693748: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693748 704419: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704419 762713: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762713 769750: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769750 772653: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772653 825371: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825371 830578: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830578 830693: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830693 846612: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846612 846616: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846616 846638: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846638 846640: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846640 851171: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851171 851182: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851182 867895: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867895 869206: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869206 870675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870675 872845: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872845 881813: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881813 941856: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941856 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: subj
ar Safin '. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1021304: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021304 1023388: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023388 1034564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034564 1034650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034650 1035597: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035597 704108: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704108 769748: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769748 771244: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771244 771258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771258 773668: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773668 773673: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773673 778531: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778531 832999: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832999 833059: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833059 833155: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833155 847993: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847993 848348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848348 870096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870096 870270: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870270 870317: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870317 881995: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881995 883579: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883579 889079: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889079 898486: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898486 916084: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916084 935334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935334 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: subj
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 762304 ! Bug #762304 [debootstrap] debootstrap doesn't unmount /proc and /sys if caught Ctrl-C Changed Bug submitter to 'Askar Safin ' from 'Askar Safin '. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 762304: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762304 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: [bts-link] source package src:busybox
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:busybox > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org). > # remote status report for #1059049 (http://bugs.debian.org/1059049) > # Bug title: busybox: CVE-2022-48174 > # * https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15216 > # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED > # * closed upstream > tags 1059049 + fixed-upstream Bug #1059049 [src:busybox] busybox: CVE-2022-48174 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > usertags 1059049 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. > # remote status report for #1059050 (http://bugs.debian.org/1059050) > # Bug title: busybox: CVE-2023-42363 > # * https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15865 > # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW > usertags 1059050 + status-NEW There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-NEW. > # remote status report for #1059051 (http://bugs.debian.org/1059051) > # Bug title: busybox: CVE-2023-42364 > # * https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15868 > # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW > usertags 1059051 + status-NEW There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-NEW. > # remote status report for #1059052 (http://bugs.debian.org/1059052) > # Bug title: busybox: CVE-2023-42365 > # * https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15871 > # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW > usertags 1059052 + status-NEW There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-NEW. > # remote status report for #1059053 (http://bugs.debian.org/1059053) > # Bug title: busybox: CVE-2023-42366 > # * https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15874 > # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW > usertags 1059053 + status-NEW There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-NEW. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1059049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059049 1059053: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059053 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1037972: marked as done (Bug on Debian 12 Bookworm - Installation reports - /etc/apt/source.list)
Your message dated Sat, 23 Dec 2023 02:12:33 +0100 (CET) with message-id <2033541051.240.1703293953...@bluewin.ch> and subject line Bug on Debian 12 Bookworm - Installation reports - /etc/apt/source.list has caused the Debian Bug report #1037972, regarding Bug on Debian 12 Bookworm - Installation reports - /etc/apt/source.list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1037972: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037972 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debian-12.0.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso File: /etc/apt/source.list Severity: high (security) Bug Description : After installation of Debian 12 with the 'debian-12.0.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso' image, the '/etc/apt/source.list' file contains only one entry for installing or upgrading the system: deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 12.0.0 _Bookworm_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 with firmware 20230610-10:23]/ bookworm main non-free-firmware After editing the 'source.list' file with the 'software and updates' software and activating all remote repositories of the first tab of this program, only one line is added to the 'source.list' file ': deb https://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware It therefore lacks parameters to perform updates / security repertories on this DVD version of 'source.list' file, while in the Live ISO version of Debian 12 Cinnamon does not have this type of problem. Someone who doesn't know Debian and has installed the DVD edition of Debian on a machine can find themselves really embarrassed some time later since the security updates for their machine are not done without manually updating update the 'source.list' file. Thank you to correct this as soon as possible. Best regards. Philippe --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- closing bug --- End Message ---
