Bug#879755: debootstrap fails with current sid without apt-transport-https and https URLs
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.91 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, apt 1.6~alpha removed binary package apt-transport-https and therefor debootstrap with a https URL fails with dependency error: I: Checking component main on https://deb.debian.org/debian... E: Couldn't find these debs: apt-transport-https Following patch fixes it for current sid distribution. --- sid.orig2017-10-25 12:31:16.729013116 +0200 +++ sid 2017-10-25 12:31:29.789138601 +0200 @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ case $MIRRORS in https://*) - base="$base apt-transport-https ca-certificates" + base="$base ca-certificates" ;; esac } Regards Petr -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (99, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages debootstrap depends on: ii wget 1.19.1-5 Versions of packages debootstrap recommends: ii debian-archive-keyring 2017.6 ii gnupg 2.2.1-4 ii apt 1.6~alpha1 debootstrap suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
Re: Re: Boot problem
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 04:07:05PM +0100 , Marcin Owsiany wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 04:43:49PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grzegorz Bieszczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to install Debian 2.2 r0. While the first boot to start
installation system hangs after the line:
md driver 0.36.6 MAX_MD_DEV=4, MAX_REAL=8
[...]
Hardware conflict. Can you say "x86 is a crap architecture"?
I suggest you try booting with the 2nd or 3rd CDs, which have kernels
more optimized for modern (PCI) hardware.
[...]
After an attempt from 2nd CD I got additional
message:
sim710: No NCR53C710 adapter found.
never mind. this is kernel autodetection. If you don't have this one, you
can sefely ignore this
NCR reminds me of SCSI adapter, but I don't have
nad SCSI device in my computer. Looks like Debian
2.2 requires a SCSI device to be present in the
computer. Strange
If you have read the documentation, you would know that there
are 4 'flavors' of kernels in Debian. One of them only has
No. The standard one has almost all SCSI drivers, but the others don't.
drivers for SCSI drives, so you can't boot it on a IDE-only
system.
yes, you can.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
zpx it's amazing how "not-broken" debian is compared to slack and rh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[phil@bolthole.com: Re: HPT366 install disks: do we have them?]
it should probably go here and not to d-devel.
- Forwarded message from Philip Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown)
Subject: Re: HPT366 install disks: do we have them?
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 01:21:45 -0800 (PST)
I was going to stop after the last email, but I found something
interesting:
If you use the (potato) udma66 floppy images, do a system install, and then
choose "make a boot floppy"...
that floppy WILL NOT WORK, to boot off an hpt/udma66 drive.
You have to change the syslinux.cfg to add the appropriate
APPEND ide2=0x,0x
hack.
( then it presumably wont be using the proper HPT updated driver, but at
least you can get to the hpt drive again)
and since I'm replying publically after all now;
[ Petr Cech writes ]
IIRC there is such script in every flavour dir
there is a toplever install.bat, but ther are also
{compact,idepci,udma66}/install.bat batch files to boot the correct
kernel/root images
but that is not user-friendly at all. There should be a *single* unified
.bat file at the top level, that prompts the user, with a brief
explaination as to why there is a choice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- End forwarded message -
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sgore "Debian - 3 million penguins can't be wrong."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#73690: boot-floppies: apt configuration downloads package lists several times
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 07:01:57PM + , Debian User wrote:
Package: boot-floppies
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
Installing latest stable (potato) on i386 servers during apt configuration
after each apt source is added the package list is downloaded from each
server. Then when dselect is started the package list is downloaded again.
it is? I think dselect only does it when you hit [U]pdate.
This is no problem when installing on a 100 Meg link with one apt source,
but is terrible on a shared modem with 4.
and anyway apt caches the Packages file and only downloads it if it's changed
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vaidhy Debian - It is all about choice, baby!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cannot detect hard disk (hda)
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 09:27:16AM +0100 , Bee Leong Yeap wrote:
on my computer(Architechture i386), which has a Asus A7V motherboard, IBM
40GV hard drive connected to the Primary ATA100 channel, Teac CD540E 40x
^^
I think this is the problem. ATA/100.
CDROM drive connected to the Secondary IDE channel, 128 MB RAM PC133,
is the CDROM detected?
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try: cat /dev/urandom | perl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installing with 2.4.0-test8 and devfs, problem with floppy
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:32:13PM +0200 , Goswin Brederlow wrote:
So instead of having 2 different inittabs to choose from I changed
init.c to cope with it. I also changed getty to cope with it (diff is
send to maintainer and upstream) for after installation.
couldn't the rescue floppy have devfs packagem that installs the
"compatibility links" in /dev, so if init discovers it's running 2.4 kernel
with devfs it executes it and we have /dev/hda again.
And the documentation stays the same. You'll still have /dev/hda1 and not
/dev/ide/0/1 (or whatever).
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Joy sees a potato running down the street and shouting "I'm late! I'm late!" ;))
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: potato boot-floppies
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 09:55:31PM +1000 , Anthony Towns wrote:
Hello world,
Congratulations guys: -testing seems to hold nothing but praise for potato
upgrades, looks good.
cool
Is there anything more you're intending to do to b-f for potato,
beyond 2.2.15? Alternately, do whatever changes you already have in CVS
I think m68k people wanted to do a release and there are some minor
enhacements and mostly doc updates.
account for:
critical bugs - outstanding
* #64371: Smart Array RAID Compaq do not see at boot; 31 days old
1) I don't see, why it's critical
2) the -compact flavour should solve this
* #64823: incorrect LILO automatic placement on i386; 22 days old
I think the subject is missleading. It only doesn't want to put LILO into
extended partition. Let's call it a feature :)
* #65515: boot-floppies: update-modules requires /bin/bash; 8 days old
fixed modutils are in Incoming
? Or are these not really RC? (If the latter, please downgrade them
appropriately)
Basically, what I'm asking is, as far as source is concerned, are you
ready to go? I realise you need to wait for updated base packages before
you update all the arch dependent bf stuff. If you're not ready to go,
you really really need to get that way in the next day or two.
I think we wait to tausq to upload -compact and -idepci flavor and for
corresponding pcmcia packages. And b-f has to be updatet for 2.2.16
Feel free to reply to this list; I'm on it, I just don't follow it
too carefully most of the time.
Cheers,
aj (acting release manager)
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resistance is futile. You all will be packaged
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
b-f and 2.2.16
Hi,
there s 2.2.16 kenel in Incoming. Will we go with this one or will we stay at
2.2.15+patch?
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robot101 GNU\Linux on Win32 systems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: install problem
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 06:54:49PM -0400 , Robi wrote:
Hello, found you on some archives... regarding boot problems
are you aware that the current install disks, if one uses the hard drive
method, using the larger .tgz files, the drivers.tgz contains 2.2.15
kernel modules, while the vanilla and idepci kernels report being
really? That's strange.
(all files are relative to debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.15-2000-06-07)
linux - is vanilla 2.2.15 (with some patches)
drivers.tgz - modules for the above kernel. I've just checked, and they appear
to be the correct ones
idepci/linux - is the -idepci flavour
idepci/drivers.tgz - the same
2.2.15-idepci. There's a mismatch and nothing can get configured for a
proper install.
Are you sure, that you have the correct files?
idepci/linux - 610691 Jun 7 18:05 linux
idepci/drivers.tgz - 875868 Jun 7 18:05 drivers.tgz
3d36fca65ffa3eec06d356cd75946600 linux
48295d5826e00e857b4906ce55dfcf47 drivers.tgz
I have a new machine I need to install today, and am looking for a
drivers.tgz file that has the 2.2.15-idepci kernel modules.
Any suggestions?.
try to get the correct files . It should work.
-- Robi
-- Rob Markovic
-- Member of MDLUG - http://www.mdlug.org/
-- http://robi.yi.org/
-- Robi@IRC -- #Croatia -- EFnet (#NEON #Descent #MDLUG #Debian #Mpeg3)
-- ICQ #1138008
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Myth the UNIX trademark has changed hands so much no one is quite sure who really
owns it anymore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: install problem
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 07:59:24PM -0400 , Robi wrote:
ok, i downlaoded all the idepci stuff again, and now tried the 2.88 disks.
I moded the install.bat [from the idepci dir in root] file to reflect the
2.88 dists and the rescue.bin since there is no root. I get a Kernel
OK. Again wrong. The 2.88 images are really only for CD installs. They are
bootable themself and contain root.bin and the files from rescue.bin.
panic, where it can't mount 01:00 , seems RAMDISK cant find valid ramdisk
starting at 0.
of course, you need root.bin and NOT rescue.bin. So just get them from
images-1.44.
no good.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tv We are debian.org, resistance is futile, you will be apt-get upgraded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
