Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:14:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Bug#240372: boot problem, then broken fstab
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2004 00:03:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 26 16:03:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca [129.128.5.19] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B71Hx-0001Co-00; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:03:01 -0800
Received: from ualberta.ca (beast.cns.ualberta.ca [129.128.9.77])
        by pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2R02x1u000425
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:02:59 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:03:00 -0700
From: Peter Karbaliotis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: University of Alberta
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040312 Debian/1.6-3
X-Accept-Language: en, el, ja
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPARCstation 5 installation report
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004/03/26 daily sparc-sarge-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux opal 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004
sparc unknown
Date: 2004/03/04
Method: network installation, CD-ROM, mirror: sunsite.ualberta.ca, not
proxied

Machine: Sun SPARCstation 5
Processor: 25MHz(?) sun4m
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: SCSI /dev/hda 1GB
Root Size/partition table:
        scsi(0,3,0)part1        ext3    32MB    /boot
        scsi(0,3,0)part2        swap    128MB
        scsi(0,3,0)part4        ext3    256MB   /root
        scsi(0,3,0)part5        ext3    256MB   /var
        scsi(0,3,0)part6        ext2    324MB   /tmp
        scsi(0,4,0)part1        ext3    2GB     /usr
        scsi(0,4,0)part2        reiser  2GB     /home
Output of lspci: N/A

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [E]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Initial boot still requires explicity setting the root device:
"linux root=/dev/rd/0 rw".  There was a comment, IIRC, yesterday on 
#debian-boot which suggested that initrd doesn't have the right pivot.

Installed testing.

Reboot:

WARNING: Your /etc/fstab does not contain the fsck passno field.  I will 
kludge around things for you, but you should fix your /etc/fstab file as 
soon as you can.

And then the boot hangs because the root filesystem is read-only

Note: today's sarge-sparc-netinst.iso fails to install because of a 
missing initrd-tools package.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 240372-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2004 21:13:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 25 14:13:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe.atm0-0-0-2421032.0x3ef2dbfa.arcnxx7.customer.tele.dk 
(host.kl-teknik.com) [62.242.219.250] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BoqJc-0001Yo-00; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:13:53 -0700
Received: from mail.thepenguininvasion.dk (0x5358aaae.abnxx12.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk 
[::ffff:83.88.170.174])
  (AUTH: PLAIN [EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by host.kl-teknik.com with esmtp; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:18:51 +0200
  id 00003F16.410423BB.00002179
From: Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
  Peter Karbaliotis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Processed: Bug#240372: boot problem, then broken fstab
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:14:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.=20
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D240372>

I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
report some issues with the debian installer back in March, I thought I
wanted to let you know that these issue have been dealt with. Thus, I=20
will close this report.

> I completed an installation finally on this system using the 20040424=20
> businesscard iso from=20
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/. =20
>
> I still needed to boot using "linux rw".  Add to silo.conf?

fixed

> In trying to set the mirror (ftp, sunsite.ualberta.ca) I ran into=20
> #242779 as the image had busybox-cvs-udeb version 20040402-1.=20

fixed

> In the previous install, I skipped the "Partition disks" and
> "Partition  a hard drive" items and skipped to "Configure and mount
> partitions".  This time I did actually do "Partition disks" and the
> fstab was created correctly.

The interface of the partitioner has changed a lot. You should no longer=20
run into the problem you mention.

Thank you very much for your time.
=2D --=20
=46rederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu
Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A  F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBBCK0LSX61ZxOtagRAvbyAJ91a5O4inz0FFK3J1jbDfl9+BEQiwCgogxO
8YRpDWofZ7vwvfqXkT31LWY=3D
=3DrAxQ
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to