Bug#130353: marked as done (grub doesn't work on an isp1100 (1U intel server))
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:30:45 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2002 05:29:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 21 23:29:08 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from audible.transient.net [64.81.171.127] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16StUZ-0003t9-00; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:29:07 -0600 Received: (qmail 12745 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Jan 2002 05:28:56 - Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:28:56 -0800 From: Jamie Heilman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grub doesn't work on an isp1100 (1U intel server) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: grub Version: 0.90-19 Ran into a bizzare problem today, on our isp1100 1U servers the latest version of grub refuses to work, tried from the hard disk (ide) and from the floppy with the same results. Grub 0.5.93.1 works fine on these same machines. The isp1100 has console redirection but grub 0.90 fails on it with this enabled or disabled so I'm skeptical if its grub's serial code thats interfering. The symptom is generally that grub can't get past Stage 1.5 (or Stage 1 when its configured to jump directly to Stage2). -- Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/ ...thats the metaphorical equivalent of flopping your wedding tackle into a lion's mouth and flicking his lovespuds with a wet towel, pure insanity... -Rimmer --- Received: (at 130353-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 09:29:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 01:29:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cicero2.cybercity.dk ([212.242.40.53]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErB8q-0004Lz-2P for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:29:12 -0800 Received: from user1.cybercity.dk (user1.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.34]) by cicero2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD28F21EE67 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:29:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (port236.ds1-aboes.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.179]) by user1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E6F74FCD9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:29:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:30:45 +0100 From: Kristian Edlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 200063 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323388: marked as done (kraptor_0.0.20040403-2(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:43:37 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line kraptor_0.0.20040403-2(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 12:20:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 05:20:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E50QT-0005n6-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:20:17 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FCF1778F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A6135894 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09619-09 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 105) id 1B96E3583A; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4203D1308A8; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:15:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:15:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kraptor_0.0.20040403-2(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kraptor Version: 0.0.20040403-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid kraptor fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=kraptorver=0.0.20040403-2arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=kraptor -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 323388-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 09:43:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 01:43:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErBMo-0001do-Qg for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:43:38 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A43D87009; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:43:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:43:37 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: kraptor_0.0.20040403-2(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=uTRFFR9qmiCqR05s Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --uTRFFR9qmiCqR05s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This package has subsequently built successfully on m68k, once the toolchain was fixed, so the bug can be closed. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --uTRFFR9qmiCqR05s
Bug#273069: marked as done (kdm: %d option in greet string has stopped working)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:07:31 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#273069: fixed in 3.4.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2004 17:55:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 23 10:55:07 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gr-visitor.uchicago.edu [128.135.136.88] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CAXoB-0003SI-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:55:07 -0700 Received: from iseggev by gr-visitor.uchicago.edu with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CAXnj-en-Vy; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:54:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:54:39 -0500 From: Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kdm: %d option in greet string has stopped working Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.99.3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i Sender: Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid The %d option in the greet string, which is supposed to insert the current display number, has stopped working. It seems to be replaced by a null string instead. According to the comments in /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc, it is still a valid option, so this would appear to be an actual bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 Versions of packages kdm depends on: ii debconf 1.4.36 Debian configuration management sy ii kdebase-bin 4:3.3.0-1 KDE Base (binaries) ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.0-1.1KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.4.2-2 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.2-3GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpam-runtime0.76-22Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.76-22Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpng12-01.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.3-4.1Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.4-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System event recording an ii xbase-clients 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.1.2-1compression library - runtime -- debconf information: kdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false * kdm/default_servers_nolisten_tcp: * kdm/default_servers_100dpi: shared/default-x-display-manager: kdm * kdm/default_nolisten_udp: kdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/kdm --- Received: (at 273069-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 10:11:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 02:11:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outfbmx004.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.3.103]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErBnO-0007Ix-Dl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:11:06 -0800 Received: from outmx014.isp.belgacom.be (outmx014.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.4.69]) by outfbmx004.isp.belgacom.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF5E3907C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:11:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from
Bug#273069: marked as done (kdm: %d option in greet string has stopped working)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:14:50 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#273069: fixed in 3.4.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2004 17:55:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 23 10:55:07 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gr-visitor.uchicago.edu [128.135.136.88] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CAXoB-0003SI-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:55:07 -0700 Received: from iseggev by gr-visitor.uchicago.edu with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CAXnj-en-Vy; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:54:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:54:39 -0500 From: Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kdm: %d option in greet string has stopped working Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.99.3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i Sender: Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid The %d option in the greet string, which is supposed to insert the current display number, has stopped working. It seems to be replaced by a null string instead. According to the comments in /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc, it is still a valid option, so this would appear to be an actual bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 Versions of packages kdm depends on: ii debconf 1.4.36 Debian configuration management sy ii kdebase-bin 4:3.3.0-1 KDE Base (binaries) ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.0-1.1KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.4.2-2 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.2-3GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpam-runtime0.76-22Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.76-22Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpng12-01.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.3-4.1Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.4-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System event recording an ii xbase-clients 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.1.2-1compression library - runtime -- debconf information: kdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false * kdm/default_servers_nolisten_tcp: * kdm/default_servers_100dpi: shared/default-x-display-manager: kdm * kdm/default_nolisten_udp: kdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/kdm --- Received: (at 273069-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 10:14:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 02:14:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErBr5-0007XP-4A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:14:55 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1ErBr1-0002oh-1L; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:14:51 +0100 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:14:50 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
Bug#341670: marked as done (libosgcal0: Uninstallable)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:15:46 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libosgcal0: Uninstallable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 04:37:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 01 20:37:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ei2fP-0003KJ-CN for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:37:03 -0800 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-106-110.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.106.110]) by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jB24b0Fe018206; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:37:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ei2fM-0004vH-D9; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 23:37:00 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libosgcal0: Uninstallable X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 23:37:00 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libosgcal0 Version: 0.1.36-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Depends: libcal3d11 This is due to a bug in libcal3d11-dev; it's generating bad shlibs:Depends. --- Received: (at 341670-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 10:15:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 02:15:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErBrv-0007dn-Gs for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:15:47 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B4A27009; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:15:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:15:46 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: libosgcal0: Uninstallable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=wayzTnRSUXKNfBqd Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --wayzTnRSUXKNfBqd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fixed in binNMU. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --wayzTnRSUXKNfBqd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDsRRSKN6ufymYLloRAlbQAJ9xu4ybYIy/6LSLOQ9/m9AfzqWT8QCdGiRy gEvp2yC24w4tIDTvtkEJmuc= =mnaj -END PGP SIGNATURE- --wayzTnRSUXKNfBqd-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344341: marked as done (make-kpkg clean, make-kpkg kernel_image sequence does not work with --revision flag)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:09:11 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line This has been fixed in the versions now in Sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2005 22:44:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 21 14:44:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 219-75-232-131.eonet.ne.jp ([219.75.232.131] helo=viper2.netfort.gr.jp) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EpChY-0006i2-1d for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:44:52 -0800 Received: (qmail 17877 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2005 22:44:51 - Received: from unknown (HELO dancer64.netfort.gr.jp.netfort.gr.jp) (127.0.0.1) by viper2.netfort.gr.jp with SMTP; 21 Dec 2005 22:44:51 - Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:44:51 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: make-kpkg clean, make-kpkg kernel_image sequence does not work with --revision flag User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - Maruoka) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kernel-package Version: 10.020 The following command-sequence does not work, nobody seems to be cleaning debian/changelog, and --revision flag seems to require debian/changelog to be cleared before functioning. $ make-kpkg clean exec make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/minimal.mk clean == making target minimal_clean [new prereqs: ]== test ! -f .config || cp -pf .config config.precious test ! -e stamp-building || rm -f stamp-building test ! -f Makefile || \ make CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-linux-gnu- ARCH=x86_64 distclean make[1]: $B%G%#%l%/%H%j(B `/home/dancer/shared/git/linux-2.6' $B$KF~$j$^$9(B CLEAN .config make[1]: $B%G%#%l%/%H%j(B `/home/dancer/shared/git/linux-2.6' $B$+$i=P$^$9(B test ! -f config.precious || mv -f config.precious .config rm -f modules/modversions.h modules/ksyms.ver conf.vars scripts/cramfs/cramfsck scripts/cramfs/mkcramfs applied_patches stamp-build stamp-configure stamp-image stamp-headers stamp-src stamp-diff stamp-doc stamp-manual stamp-patch stamp-buildpackage stamp-debian stamp-kernel-configure $ nice make-kpkg -rootcmd fakeroot --revision GIT.$(date +%Y.%m.%d.%H.%M) kernel_image modules_image| tee ../build-$(date +%Y.%m.%d.%H.%M).log I note that you are using the --revision flag with the value GIT.2005.12.22.07.42. However, the ./debian/changelog file exists, and has a different value GIT.2005.12.19.23.13. I am confused by this discrepancy, and am halting. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project --- Received: (at 344341-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 10:14:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 02:14:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net ([12.107.230.171] helo=glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErBr7-0007Xd-JW for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:14:58 -0800 Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBRA9C5Y030594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:09:12 -0600 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBRA9BTN030593; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:09:11 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: This has been fixed in the versions now in Sid Organization: Manoj Srivastava's Home User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Face:
Bug#330327: marked as done (Needs rebuild for C++ transition)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:29:43 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Needs rebuild for C++ transition has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 15:22:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 08:22:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sparcs.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.234.102] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKHHb-0002Ed-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:22:15 -0700 Received: from tinuviel by sparcs.kaist.ac.kr with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EKHHa-00041I-EN for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:22:14 +0900 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:22:14 +0900 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Needs rebuild for C++ transition Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: SPARCS, KAIST User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Seo Sanghyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libxml-sablot-perl Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious libxml-sablot-perl depends on libsablot0c102 which is no more in Sid due to C++ transition. Seo Sanghyeon --- Received: (at 330327-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 10:29:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 02:29:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErC5Q-9l-TJ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:29:45 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C521D7009; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:29:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:29:43 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Needs rebuild for C++ transition Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=byLs0wutDcxFdwtm Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --byLs0wutDcxFdwtm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This bug has been fixed in binNMU; libxml-sablot-perl now depends on libsablot0 on all arches. Cheers, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --byLs0wutDcxFdwtm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDsReXKN6ufymYLloRAsSmAJ9JV9tMz8EkkzCZzfbwUf9nvRlRDwCfXyIW hxefKXkVhWikNvtOFbuiwPE= =W8J6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --byLs0wutDcxFdwtm-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337355: marked as done (FTBFS: mailutils fails one imap4)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:37:43 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FTBFS: mailutils fails one imap4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 03:00:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 19:00:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk [80.68.88.63] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EXrob-0007A5-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 19:00:30 -0800 Received: from courthouse.aleph1.co.uk ([217.147.92.89] helo=court) by stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EXrno-gn-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 02:59:41 + Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=courthouse.aleph1.co.uk ident=www-data) by court with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EXrnm-0004aN-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 02:59:38 + Received: from 80.3.128.9 (proxying for 81.104.193.137) (SquirrelMail authenticated user wookey) by courthouse.aleph1.co.uk with HTTP; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 02:59:38 - (GMT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 02:59:38 - (GMT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Aleph_One_Ltd-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Aleph_One_Ltd-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: mailutils fails one imap4 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Subject: mailutils: FTBFS on arm. One imap4d test fails. Package: mailutils Version: 0.6.90 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 The package builds OK, but fails one test, so the overall build fails: === imap4d tests === Schedule of variations: unix Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target. Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target. Using /build/buildd/mailutils-0.6.90/imap4d/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. Running /build/buildd/mailutils-0.6.90/imap4d/testsuite/imap4d/IDEF0955.exp ... FAIL: UID FETCH 1:4294967294 FLAGS I don't know what these tests are doing. Clues for ways to get to the bottom of the problem would be helpful. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable') Architecture: arm (armv4l) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-netwinder Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mailutils depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgdbmg1 1.7.3-28 GNU dbm database routines (runtime pn libguile9Not found. ii libltdl31.5.6-6 A system independent dlopen wrappe pn libmailutils0Not found. ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline44.3-11 GNU readline and history libraries Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd --- Received: (at 337355-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 10:37:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 02:37:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErCDA-yo-Oa for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:37:44 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D0DDA7009; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:37:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:37:43 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTBFS: mailutils fails one imap4 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=1ou9v+QBCNysIXaH Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
Bug#332274: marked as done (muine: uninstallable on non-i386 arches)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:52:48 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line muine: uninstallable on non-i386 arches has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 15:50:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 08:50:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENBXL-0002oA-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:50:31 -0700 Received: from 208-58-77-33.c3-0.grg-ubr3.lnh-grg.md.cable.rcn.com (HELO tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net) ([208.58.77.33]) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2005 11:50:29 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i=3.97,178,1125892800; d=scan'208; a=92984896:sNHT3934250858 Received: from amu by tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ENBXI-0004Lz-TS for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:50:28 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: muine: uninstallable on non-i386 arches X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:50:28 -0400 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: locally generated X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: muine Version: 0.8.3-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When muine jumped the gun on gtk-sharp2 2.3.91, it did so only for i386; on other architectures, the autobuilders naturally continued to use 1.9.5. As such, could you please reupload the package, preferably with updated build-dependencies to be safe? Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 332274-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 10:52:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 02:52:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErCRl-0001vw-9t for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:52:49 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D5827009; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:52:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:52:48 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: muine: uninstallable on non-i386 arches Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=lildS9pRFgpM/xzO Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --lildS9pRFgpM/xzO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've queued a binNMU for muine on powerpc, and requested that the amd64 admins to the same on that architecture; that should resolve this bug AIUI, with no further source changes required to muine. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --lildS9pRFgpM/xzO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDsR0AKN6ufymYLloRAuCQAKCxv33xRQy255CICv7iYgSjhj7ykgCfVxF3 QM75732kDhVrIHeisWc3kJQ= =gA4z -END PGP SIGNATURE- --lildS9pRFgpM/xzO-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject
Bug#283320: marked as done (perl FTBFS on mipsel/lasat, but not on mipsel/cobalt)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:12:21 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line perl FTBFS on mipsel/lasat, but not on mipsel/cobalt has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2004 04:25:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 27 20:25:31 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CYGct-0003Jk-00; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:25:31 -0800 Received: from rcm-200-220-132-60.nipnet.net.br (khazad-dum.debian.net) [200.220.132.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CYGct-00073C-00; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:25:31 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121C4206158; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:25:30 -0200 (BRST) Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (khazad-dum [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09806-03; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:25:28 -0200 (BRST) Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C7EB200370; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:25:28 -0200 (BRST) Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:25:28 -0200 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: perl: [5.8.4-4] FTBFS on mipsel, holding other packages with security holes from sarge Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2 X-GPG-Fingerprint-1: 1024D/128D36EE 50AC 661A 7963 0BBA 8155 43D5 6EF7 F36B 128D 36EE X-GPG-Fingerprint-2: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at khazad-dum.debian.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: perl Version: 5.8.4-4 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: holding packages with remote exploitable security holes from sarge Perl is not building on MIPSEL, due to test-suite failures. It is holding packages from sarge that fix security holes that are remotely exploitable, thus the inflated severity of this bug (instead of the usual serious severity). See http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlver=5.8.4-4arch=mipselstamp=1101291814file=logas=raw -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.28-rc1-debian5+skas+lmsensors+3c59xvlan+lmlbt4x Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages perl depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-17Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libgdbm31.8.3-2 GNU dbm database routines (runtime ii perl-base 5.8.4-4 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis ii perl-modules5.8.4-4 Core Perl modules -- no debconf information -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh --- Received: (at 283320-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 11:12:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 03:12:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErCkg-0007I8-Tb for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:12:23 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 45FE07009; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:12:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:12:21 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: perl FTBFS on mipsel/lasat, but not on mipsel/cobalt Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=AQYPrgrEUc/1pSX1 Content-Disposition: inline
Bug#344869: marked as done (mozilla-firefox: Bookmarks not working, stays running in background after closing main window)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:28:32 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Invalid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 03:41:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 26 19:41:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c-71-56-17-167.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([71.56.17.167] helo=localhost.localdomain) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Er5iQ-0002UU-WE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:41:35 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rajesh Deo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mozilla-firefox: Bookmarks not working, stays running in background after closing main window Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:41:52 -0500 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After a apt-get upgrade, firefox is completely unusable. We expect the maintainer to atleast test his build before upload! If one closes the main window via clicking the 'x' button on the window or by Ctrl-W, the windows disappears but firefox binary keeps running in the background. After killing the binary (with killall -9 firefox-bin), firefox can be starts but displays the clear private data message box. If you select clear data button, the browser starts. Bookmarks on the toolbar, as well as in the menu are useless; after clicking on any one of them the browsers does not load the webpage. -Rajesh -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on: ii firefox 1.5.dfsg-3 lightweight web browser based on M mozilla-firefox recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 344869-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 11:28:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 03:28:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.vif.com ([216.239.64.153] helo=buddha.vif.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErD03-0007yZ-2S for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:28:15 -0800 Received: from [216.239.73.17] (ip216-239-73-17.vif.net [216.239.73.17]) by buddha.vif.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBRBSBZB039161 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:28:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:28:32 -0500 From: Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Invalid Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-vif-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-vif-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-vif-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Closing per submitter's request. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344852: marked as done (kernel-patch-openswan: PATCHNAME=openswan in apply script but =freeswan in unpatch)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:32:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344852: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2005 23:05:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 26 15:05:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from skipper.rmf.pl ([193.111.26.2]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Er1PU-AI-MV for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:05:44 -0800 Received: from larch.medeae.berdyczow.org ([193.111.27.210] helo=localhost.localdomain) by skipper.rmf.pl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1Er1PO-0005lS-8h; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:05:40 +0100 Received: from lgrochal by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1Er1SC-0006MQ-I5; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:08:32 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lukasz Grochal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-patch-openswan: PATCHNAME=openswan in apply script but =freeswan in unpatch Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:08:32 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kernel-patch-openswan Severity: normal The subject says it all, I guess. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) --- Received: (at 344852-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 11:42:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 03:42:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErD3r-Gn-0r; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:32:11 -0800 From: Rene Mayrhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344852: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.4-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:32:11 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: openswan Source-Version: 1:2.4.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openswan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-patch-openswan_2.4.4-3_all.deb to pool/main/o/openswan/kernel-patch-openswan_2.4.4-3_all.deb openswan-modules-source_2.4.4-3_all.deb to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan-modules-source_2.4.4-3_all.deb openswan_2.4.4-3.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.4-3.diff.gz openswan_2.4.4-3.dsc to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.4-3.dsc openswan_2.4.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.4-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Rene Mayrhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated openswan package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:38:33 + Source: openswan Binary: openswan-modules-source kernel-patch-openswan openswan Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1:2.4.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Rene Mayrhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Rene Mayrhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: kernel-patch-openswan - IPSEC kernel support for Openswan openswan - IPSEC utilities for Openswan openswan-modules-source - IPSEC kernel modules
Bug#337606: marked as done (openslp - don't build-depend on libssl)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:47:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337606: fixed in openslp 1.2.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 09:46:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 01:46:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYKcb-0001ws-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 01:46:01 -0800 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1D74A3C025; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 10:45:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 10:45:58 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openslp - don't build-depend on libssl Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: openslp Severity: grave Version: 1.2.1-3 openslp don't build-depends on libssl but the binary packages depends on it. | Package: libslp1 | Source: openslp | Version: 1.2.1-3 | Depends: libc6 (=3D 2.3.2.ds1-21), libssl0.9.7, debconf | debconf-2.0, n= et-tools Bastian --=20 I'm frequently appalled by the low regard you Earthmen have for life. -- Spock, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2822.3 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkNsf1UACgkQnw66O/MvCNHMKACeLfOeAZ4D7ESnVxFYKH5BF91U tAYAn2KH1NQKOLDorPR/xDBp0BQRTrmK =md6U -END PGP SIGNATURE- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1-- --- Received: (at 337606-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 11:50:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 03:50:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErDIN-0005WG-0e; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:47:11 -0800 From: Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#337606: fixed in openslp 1.2.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:47:11 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: openslp Source-Version: 1.2.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openslp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libslp-dev_1.2.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openslp/libslp-dev_1.2.1-4_i386.deb libslp1_1.2.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openslp/libslp1_1.2.1-4_i386.deb openslp-doc_1.2.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/o/openslp/openslp-doc_1.2.1-4_all.deb openslp_1.2.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openslp/openslp_1.2.1-4.diff.gz openslp_1.2.1-4.dsc to pool/main/o/openslp/openslp_1.2.1-4.dsc slpd_1.2.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openslp/slpd_1.2.1-4_i386.deb slptool_1.2.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openslp/slptool_1.2.1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated openslp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:31:24 +0530 Source: openslp Binary: libslp-dev slptool libslp1
Bug#248285: marked as done (Package removal deletes default route)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:22:04 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in stable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2004 10:09:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 10 03:09:09 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BN7ie-Nq-00; Mon, 10 May 2004 03:09:09 -0700 Received: (qmail 16371 invoked by uid 65534); 10 May 2004 10:08:37 - Received: from d006166.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO berlin) (80.171.6.166) by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 10 May 2004 12:08:37 +0200 X-Authenticated: #7258287 Subject: Package removal deletes default route From: Sven Lauritzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 12:08:36 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: ipppd Version: 3.1pre4-4 Severity: serious I've got no ISDN-card installed. Kernel support for ISDN is not available. I'm on a LAN behind a NAT router. These ara my routes: # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 10.155.12.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 0.0.0.0 10.155.12.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 After apt-get install ipppd apt-get remove --purge ppp isdnutils-base it looks like this: # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 10.155.12.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 In order to try the isdnutils a collegue installed these packages on a machine on the internet and I removed them remotely (of course at 3:00 AM). The machine was not accessible any more. I've set severity to serious, because this bug damages the system. I hope i have cought the correct package. Regards -- Sven Lauritzen mailto: the minus pulse at gmx dot net pub 1024D/95C9A892 sub 1024g/D30E490F ABCDEFGHIJKLM Fp 2FA9 FC9B 078C 5BC7 87DC 0B0D 2329 94F6 95C9 A892 NOPQRSTUVWXYZ --- Received: (at 248285-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 12:22:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 04:22:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2] ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErDqI-0003Hg-1F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:22:14 -0800 Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id 976B25F75F; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:22:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 98EA41CB51; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:22:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:22:04 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in stable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 1:3.6.2005-01-03-4 I am closing this bug which is present only in oldstable. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326582: marked as done (t38modem_0.8.0+20050304-2 (m68k/unstable): FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:29:28 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line t38modem_0.8.0+20050304-2 (m68k/unstable): FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 09:04:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 02:04:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBqQK-0006Vq-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:04:24 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 4AA877046; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:04:23 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: t38modem_0.8.0+20050304-2 (m68k/unstable): FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: t38modem Version: 0.8.0+20050304-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS The t38modem package currently fails to build on m68k with the following error: [...] g++ -D_REENTRANT -fno-exceptions -Wall -I/usr/share/pwlib//include -DPTRA= CING -I/usr/include/openh323 -DHAS_OSS -Os -Wall -g -O2 -felide-constructo= rs -x c++ -c fcs.cxx -o obj_linux_m68k_r/fcs.o /usr/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_ma= p.h:133: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs. make[1]: *** [obj_linux_m68k_r/fcs.o] Error 1 [...] A full build log can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=3Dt38modemver=3D0.8.0%2B20050304-= 2arch=3Dm68kstamp=3D1124063015file=3Dlogas=3Draw. Of course, this gives every indication that it's a toolchain problem, not a problem with your sources; nevertheless, your package fails to build, and there's a long queue of new ICEs with gcc-4.0 that will take a while to all get fixed, so you may want to see if using gcc-3.4 on m68k is a possible workaround for this problem. --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDGriXKN6ufymYLloRAncaAJ9P2+cQSVZPASx/ib0VYejZeleTiwCdGEiG +paumYqa+qYQJb9KWjEoubc= =sm72 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- --- Received: (at 326582-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 12:29:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 04:29:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErDxJ-0004GB-9D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:29:29 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5C6BF7009; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:29:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:29:28 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: t38modem_0.8.0+20050304-2 (m68k/unstable): FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ftQmbtOmUf2cr8rB Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#265557: marked as done (cannot disable automatic HiSax startup)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:27:18 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bogus bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2004 17:18:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 13 10:18:49 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.20.157] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BvfhZ-0005KC-00; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:18:49 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (pD9EBBFC4.dip.t-dialin.net [217.235.191.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id i7DHIXVM009585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:18:45 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:17:44 +0200 From: Florian Effenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cannot disable automatic HiSax startup X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: isdnutils-base Version: 1:3.3.0.20040704-0.4 I don't know if this is the right package to file the bug report to, but I cannot disable the automatic HiSax startup. I have a AVM Fritz!Card PCI which is detected by HiSax, but does not work. If I rmmod the HiSax drivers and modprobe again with options type=27, it works just fine. So I guess the automatic hardware detected runs bogus here and uses the ISA card. Where can I disable the automatic HiSax startup? I tried /etc/hotplug/blacklist, /etc/discover.conf, boot prompt and disabling /etc/init.d/isdnutils, but nothings seems to work. Maybe the hardware detection lies in the kernel? --- Received: (at 265557-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 12:27:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 04:27:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2] ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErDvL-00042y-AS for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:27:27 -0800 Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id 386E85F75F; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:27:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2D2201CB51; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:27:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:27:18 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bogus bug Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Drivers may be loaded by hotplug, udev or even discover. This is not a bug. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328177: marked as done (spiralsynthmodular: FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:23:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line spiralsynthodular: FTBFS on m68k has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 00:04:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 17:04:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFKkv-00048b-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:04:05 -0700 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-107-243.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.107.243]) by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8E0427Z85; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:04:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EFKks-0001Sr-7V; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:04:02 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: spiralsynthmodular: FTBFS on m68k X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:04:02 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: spiralsynthmodular Version: 0.2.2a-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Build log is at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=spiralsynthmodularver=0.2.2a-2.1arch=m68kstamp=1123314078file=logas=raw GCC segfaults. Good luck tracking it down. :-( Especially given that GCC is generally kind of broken on m68k. You might just try building with a reduced optimization level, however. Or if that doesn't work, using gcc 3.4. --- Received: (at 328177-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 12:23:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 04:23:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErDrH-0003JY-VY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:23:16 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B93057009; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:23:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:23:14 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: spiralsynthodular: FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=gh4H09KImyIEQ1se Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --gh4H09KImyIEQ1se Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable spiralsynthmodular has successfully built on m68k with a newer toolchain; closing this bug report accordingly. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --gh4H09KImyIEQ1se Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDsTIyKN6ufymYLloRAkEaAKCmgbW3aisq9aUEl8UyFqghWtJU0wCfQf0T F+yVnAsUZEFSeBYwTAwM/3g= =MCX8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --gh4H09KImyIEQ1se-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#277315: marked as done (isdnutils-base: After last isdnutils upgrade /dev/isdninfo is missing....)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:43:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 1:3.6.2005-01-03-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2004 11:45:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 19 04:45:14 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CJsQT-0003kx-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:45:13 -0700 Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CJsQS-0002kU-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:45:12 +0200 Received: from [80.138.157.159] (helo=alzental-castle.homelinux.org) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CJsQS-0008IO-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:45:12 +0200 Received: from rd by alzental-castle.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CJsQN-00047y-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:45:07 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rainer Dorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: isdnutils-base: After last isdnutils upgrade /dev/isdninfo is missing X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:45:07 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Rainer Dorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] auth:a311679657d28b4abe5306853591a4a5 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: isdnutils-base Version: 1:3.3.0.20040728-4 Severity: normal Hello, I just noticed that my vbox system is not running any more. After investigating the problem, I found The problem occurs since Sept 28th. The problem is manifested by a missing /dev/isdninfo silverboxy:~# /etc/init.d/isdnutils restart Restarting ISDN services: error: Neither /dev/isdninfo nor /dev/isdn/isdninfo exist! Before you can use any ISDN facilities, ensure you have the proper kernel modules loaded. These will probably be 'isdn' and 'hisax'. Read /usr/share/doc/isdnutils-base/README.HiSax.gz for more information (e.g. with 'zless /usr/share/doc/isdnutils-base/README.HiSax.gz'). silverboxy:~# This is issued by /etc/isdn/init.d.functions. The problem might have something todo with the fact that I am using devfs, though grepping through /usr/share/isdnutils reveals that isdnutils should support devfs in changelog.Debian.gz It seems that I upgraded isdnutils at September 28th during a regular sarge upgrade. My backup system did a couple of backups on September 29th in /etc/isdn, so I assume that a new version of isdnutils was installed. Though I could not find a significant difference in the configuration files in /etc/isdn... My system uses an AVM fritzcard DSL. I can make an internet connection through it (both through DSL and ISDN). Not sure what went wrong during that upgrade, please let me know if I can provide further information to help you to identify the bug. I am out for a week starting from tomorrow. Thanks, Rainer -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages isdnutils-base depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.8 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev -- debconf information: isdnutils/no_ipppd_selected: isdnutils/isdnutils-cronweekly: isdnutils/isdnvbox-cronweekly: isdnutils/firmwarecards: isdnutils/makedev: yes * isdnutils/firmware: none --- Received: (at 277315-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 12:43:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 04:43:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2] ident=postfix) by
Bug#136629: marked as done (ipppd: kernel crash when used together with ppp+pppoe)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:33:53 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line not an isdnutils bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2002 14:36:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 03 08:36:18 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from p508518cd.dip.t-dialin.net (spruce) [80.133.24.205] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16hX61-ol-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 08:36:18 -0600 Received: from toni by spruce with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16hX5V-Vw-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 15:35:45 +0100 From: Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 15:35:45 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ipppd: kernel crash when used together with ppp+pppoe Package: ipppd Version: 1:3.1pre1b-30 Severity: wishlist Hello, I don't know if this is the right package to file this bug against, so feel free to reassign it to a different package. I have two connections to the external world, one using ISDN and ipppd, the other using ppp+pppoe, from what's mostly a sid box (but with kernel 2.2.20). Normally, I have the one connection to the Internet running over ppp+pppoe, and the other to specific networks over ISDN. When I want to use them both together, I invariably get an instant kernel crash the moment a package is going to be pushed to the ISDN interface (ippp1 in my case). This requires pressing the reset button to get the machine back to life. The error message printed on the screen mostly talks about a corrupt CPU context (1-2 short lines before the machine freezes hard). Running only one of these packages is not a problem - they both work fine for me, most of the time. Any hints are welcome! Best, --Toni++ -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux spruce 2.2.20 #1 Mon Dec 31 07:05:08 EST 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages ipppd depends on: ii isdnutils-base 3.1pre1b-30ISDN utilities, the basic (minimal) set ii libc6 2.2.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii ppp2.4.1.uus-4Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daemon. --- Begin /etc/ppp/ioptions (modified conffile) Config file not present or no permissions for access --- End /etc/ppp/ioptions --- Begin /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/00-ipppd (modified conffile) Config file not present or no permissions for access --- End /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/00-ipppd --- Begin /etc/ppp/ip-down.d/99-ipppd (modified conffile) Config file not present or no permissions for access --- End /etc/ppp/ip-down.d/99-ipppd --- Received: (at 136629-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 12:35:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 04:35:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2] ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErE33-0004d2-8X for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:35:25 -0800 Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id 067B55F75F; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:35:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8FE301CB51; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:33:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:33:53 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: not an isdnutils bug Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 If the kernel crashes, it's a kernel bug. I will not bother reassigning this bug to a kernel package because probably it has been fixed since when it was reported (and nobody cares about bugs in 2.2 kernels anyway). -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344131: marked as done (upgrade: command not found)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:47:24 +0100 (MET) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344131: gpdf: upgrade: command not found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 09:37:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 01:37:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-102-tuesday.noc.nerim.net ([62.4.17.102] helo=mallaury.nerim.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eodw7-0001A6-9u for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:37:35 -0800 Received: from corfou.internal.isoscope.com (isoscope.net1.nerim.net [213.41.137.29]) by mallaury.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C764F414; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:37:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from chypre (chypre.internal.isoscope.com [192.168.236.33]) by corfou.internal.isoscope.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D046030; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:37:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from gay by chypre with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EodtU-0003jI-00; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:34:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 From: Jean-Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: upgrade: command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:34:52 +0100 Sender: Jean-Michel Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gpdf Version: 2.10.0-1 Severity: normal the upgrade finish by the following message. /var/lib/dpkg/info/gpdf.postinst: line 24: gconf-schemas: command not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des d=E9pendances... Fait Les paquets suivants ont =E9t=E9 conserv=E9s=A0: aalib1 abiword-common abiword-gnome akode alsa-base alsa-utils amor apt apt-utils aptitude ark arts artsbuilder atlantik audacity bind9-host bsh bug-buddy capplets-data cervisia cupsys dcoprss dnsutils eog evolution evolution-data-server eyesapplet festival fifteenapplet fvwm galeon-common gcj gconf-editor gconf2 gdk-imlib1 ggcov gimp gimp-data gimp-svg gksu gnome-bin gnome-control-center gnome-cups-manager gnome-doc-utils gnome-games gnome-games-data gnome-libs-data gnome-media gnome-session gnome-system-monitor gnome-system-tools gnome-utils gstreamer0.8-flac gstreamer0.8-misc gstreamer0.8-vorbis imagemagick inkscape juk kaboodle kaddressbook kalarm kalzium kamera kandy kappfinder karm kasteroids kate katomic kaudiocreator kbackgammon kbattleship kblackbox kbounce kbruch kcalc kcharselect kcoloredit kcontrol kcron kdat kde-i18n-fr kdeadmin kdeadmin-kfile-plugins kdeartwork kdeartwork-style kdeartwork-theme-window kdebase kdebase-bin kdebase-data kdebase-kio-plugins kdeedu kdegames kdegraphics kdegraphics-kfile-plugins kdelibs kdelibs-bin kdelibs-data kdelibs4 kdelirc kdemultimedia kdemultimedia-kfile-plugins kdemultimedia-kio-plugins kdenetwork kdenetwork-filesharing kdepasswd kdepim kdepim-kfile-plugins kdepim-kio-plugins kdepim-wizards kdeprint kdesktop kdessh kdetoys kdeutils kdewebdev kdf kdict kdiff3 kdm kdvi kedit keduca kenolaba kfax kfilereplace kfind kfloppy kfouleggs kgamma kget kghostview kgoldrunner kgpg khangman khelpcenter khexedit kicker kiconedit kig kimagemapeditor kitchensync kiten kjots kjumpingcube klaptopdaemon klatin kleopatra klettres klettres-data klickety klines klinkstatus klipper kmahjongg kmail kmailcvt kmenuedit kmessedwords kmid kmilo kmines kmix kmoon kmplot kmrml knetload knewsticker knode knotes kodo kolf kolourpaint kommander kompare konqueror konqueror-nsplugins konquest konsole konsolekalendar kontact kooka kopete korganizer korn kpackage kpager kpat kpdf kpercentage kpersonalizer kpf kpilot kpoker kpovmodeler kppp krdc krec kregexpeditor kreversi krfb kruler ksame kscd kscreensaver kscreensaver-xsavers kshisen ksim ksirc ksirtet ksmiletris ksmserver ksnake ksnapshot ksokoban kspaceduel ksplash kstars kstars-data ksvg ksync ksysguard ksysguardd ksysv kteatime ktimer ktip ktnef ktouch ktron ktuberling kturtle ktux kuickshow kuser kverbos kview
Bug#341381: marked as done (grub: Grub shell cannot find hard disk)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:07:42 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Problem is gone in version 0.97-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2005 10:39:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 02:39:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp05.web.de ([217.72.192.209]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhPMa-0005ne-BE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:39:00 -0800 Received: from [217.251.235.239] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #333) id 1EhPM5-0001Uw-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:38:29 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:36:59 +0100 From: Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grub: Grub shell cannot find hard disk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: grub Version: 0.97-1 Severity: important After updating Grub to version 0.97-1, grub-install /dev/hda failed with the error message The file /boot/grub/stage1 not read correctly. The following log is left in /tmp: GNU GRUB version 0.97 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory) [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename. ] grub dump (hd0,2)/grub/stage1 /tmp/grublr2v3E Error 21: Selected disk does not exist grub quit Running grub manually gives the same Error 21 when typing root (hd0,2), for instance. I am not certain how severe this problem is; since I had used Grub before and the stage* files have been correctly copied to the directory /boot/grub by grub-install, it did not break anything for me. But it could be a _big_ problem if Grub is not yet installed on the hard disk. :-( The file /boot/grub/device.map looks as follows: (fd0) /dev/fd0 (hd0) /dev/hda -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (3, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.32 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages grub depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand grub recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 341381-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 13:13:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 05:13:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp06.web.de ([217.72.192.224]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErEeG-00033n-Th; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:13:53 -0800 Received: from [217.13.171.59] (helo=[192.168.5.16]) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.105 #340) id 1ErEdl-0003ki-00; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:13:21 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:07:42 +0100 From: Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem is gone in version 0.97-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 In the new grub package 0.97-2, I no longer see the dreadful message Error 21: Selected disk does not exist when running grub unter
Bug#344808: marked as done (libapt-pkg-perl/testing not available on AMD64)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:03:10 +1100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344808: libapt-pkg-perl/testing not available on AMD64 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2005 14:11:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 26 06:11:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from srv1.grenoble.cnrs.fr ([147.173.1.1]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eqt4B-vf-5r for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:11:11 -0800 Received: from [147.173.3.16] (dom.grenoble.cnrs.fr [147.173.3.16]) by srv1.grenoble.cnrs.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFF94AC0B6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:11:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:11:07 +0100 From: Dominique Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libapt-pkg-perl/testing not available on AMD64 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol=application/x-pkcs7-signature; micalg=sha1; boundary=ms000206070202010907030801 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --ms000206070202010907030801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: libapt-pkg-perl Version: 0.1.18 Hello, The package libapt-pkg-perl is not available on AMD64 plateform. It breaks apt-show-versions install with the following error : # apt-get install apt-show-versions libapt-pkg-perl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Package libapt-pkg-perl is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package libapt-pkg-perl has no installation candidate Is it possible to compile it for AMD64 plateform ? Thanks a lot Dom --ms000206070202010907030801 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIINDTCC A20wggJVoAMCAQICAQIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwKzELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoT BENOUlMxDTALBgNVBAMTBENOUlMwHhcNMDEwNDI3MDU0NjQ5WhcNMTEwNDI1MDU0NjQ5WjA0 MQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsGA1UEChMEQ05SUzEWMBQGA1UEAxMNQ05SUy1TdGFuZGFyZDCC ASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBANzhHiE9BovqvV60iNsPk5e0bQc9hmIA Lcr/tUqO51akj2Es8aAqq/Yq3Xwsv+91VQusCU7nTmHA5wzwkBVFEgLCjOvDEmTiYxAYLssH MdmB5dwpgpsxVuKBHopvp+ipWBFEVoNds054cC3ftv1ygUXV8e5Nzu++1T0MkCBFmgmArw9M 2iAOgL86s+sngMC5D8ChTkDcOv1qKr9A1SxxgPn4umvk6ioAqy++mvCndm2YKZwPL/BC8hiX W8n2zBlfusK+EtJcsJCUwLfLBgTvjzDtMi16SveTu6AJpLTuM8vQg5u1tbOQ3o6QHlmcINVL Hu3XTE+G+hw6KqHprAWgnb8CAwEAAaOBkjCBjzAMBgNVHRMEBTADAQH/MB0GA1UdDgQWBBRn WaXlB3RJA+8Fz8wupBjVEMiePDBTBgNVHSMETDBKgBRW62i50lx+mLWlU8ORb2NYxPlrt6Ev pC0wKzELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxDTALBgNVBAMTBENOUlOCAQAwCwYD VR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4IBAQAGA0eDckWQwk7hIderF6kBVQbKQG1Voh1e 6+IUI1nkCeKQ9jyNNgYPS6cmI2XC6gaacru4jMuKX+95NiV+ANfzBpT7g0QpJjfH7umHzmyG gBtxPdJir/bNYmxTD+Z6kwCMey4z4EEdqr5lmHbxlQd0s+Y/U3XVSwY2SynE9tyOE4BAEHOC rRV7BHFQtTcz8shku6EQfjbGra9vcFKm0a7MzLqw6FkSj2INrQPdSyroiTmIUS/tYei3MIfb J1VtZoejUQmAYXFRBb4THdlBMPx1XwqWmxj/vpCBtBPAchEI/Wqaage99IMstGA2ZAf6PWqn sJAEdoPdM8s04heYBAuhMIIEyjCCA7KgAwIBAgICKpMwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwNDELMAkG A1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDUNOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQwHhcNMDUx MTI5MTQ1MjM5WhcNMDYxMTI5MTQ1MjM5WjB9MQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsGA1UEChMEQ05S UzEOMAwGA1UECxMFVVBSMTExGzAZBgNVBAMTEkRvbWluaXF1ZSBGb3VybmllcjEyMDAGCSqG SIb3DQEJARYjZG9taW5pcXVlLmZvdXJuaWVyQGdyZW5vYmxlLmNucnMuZnIwggEiMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQCVCp6keesgTiU0/c3+qHt2UPH/d0XRsQFsj3jFttZB 2MAcRdERShUUeQi84Jak2k2DvGLuAI9QdFntHzMlZICOO+tncUVKu7o7GNWm/Ft2z6nxhZrp Vd9zMPpu0qBnsT1/5OAtgIVVkyk0sT0KfXc8Wsgj61fyWmtslSRFk/9vmo29lrtS94jRO7z0 li2aglgTgCSKEOHFK3plDtmHV4UfWBmj0DS/qTIA7KX3opcjHOEoicdTTo5OaoWmWChModEK oizeyCCjWH5GliLhzqopJewfkVgAIe5FPwetMMw5BvKjlhOGmCvxzMSyx0IwtqF1XZpt6EQk
Bug#317494: marked as done (libc6-dev: illegal syntax in obstack.h)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:16:53 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libc6-dev: illegal syntax in obstack.h has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 2005 03:25:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 08 20:25:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rozz.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.16] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dr5xn-0007Ct-00; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 20:25:11 -0700 Received: from c-24-147-127-19.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.127.19] helo=kleph.csail.mit.edu) by rozz.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.50) id 1Dr5xl-00052q-Tw for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 23:25:10 -0400 Received: from cph by kleph.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Dr5xk-0005OF-Ai for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 23:25:08 -0400 From: Chris Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6-dev: illegal syntax in obstack.h X-Debbugs-CC: Chris Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 23:25:08 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 Severity: normal Tags: sid, upstream The following definitions cause errors when compiled with gcc-4.0: obstack_ptr_grow obstack_int_grow obstack_ptr_grow_fast obstack_int_grow_fast The problem is that they each contain a statement of the form *((foo *) bar-next_free)++ = baz; which is not legal C code, because the ++ operator uses the preceding cast expression as an lvalue, but cast expressions _aren't_ lvalues. One way of dealing with this is to rewrite each instance as *((foo *) bar-next_free) = baz; bar-next_free += (sizeof (foo)); which works because the next_free field is a char *. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (1200, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2-cph2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii linux-kernel-headers2.6.12.0-1 Linux Kernel Headers for developme Versions of packages libc6-dev recommends: ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.0.0-2 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-2.95 [c-compiler]1:2.95.4-22 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.6-7 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.4 [c-compiler] 3.4.4-5 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.0 [c-compiler] 4.0.0-12The GNU C compiler -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 317494-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 13:17:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 05:17:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.nexus.co.uk ([82.70.217.43] helo=crown.nexus.co.uk) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErEhZ-0003Ly-6q for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:17:17 -0800 Received: from cpc1-cmbg6-5-0-cust20.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([81.104.210.20] helo=[192.168.2.116]) by crown.nexus.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.50) id 1ErEhT-aQ-7f for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:17:12 + Subject: Re: libc6-dev: illegal syntax in obstack.h From: Phil Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:16:53 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This bug appears to be fixed in glibc 2.3.5, now available in unstable. The current header file reads as follows: # define obstack_ptr_grow_fast(OBSTACK,aptr)\ __extension__
Bug#331621: marked as done (apcupsd: please update with newer libsnmp version)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331621: fixed in apcupsd 3.10.18-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 08:14:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 01:14:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMhwJ-0004Vq-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:14:20 -0700 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B373067D2; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:13:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A069C2C811D; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:13:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16080-05; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:13:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 52CDB2C80DA; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:13:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:13:42 +0200 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apcupsd: please update with newer libsnmp version X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:13:42 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: apcupsd Version: 3.10.18-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, apcupsd is one of the few package that still depend on the old libsnmp4.2 package. Could you please update it ? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (98, 'breezy') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 331621-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 13:41:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 05:41:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErEvu-00047Z-Jx; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800 From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#331621: fixed in apcupsd 3.10.18-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: apcupsd Source-Version: 3.10.18-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apcupsd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apcupsd-cgi_3.10.18-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd-cgi_3.10.18-4_i386.deb apcupsd-doc_3.10.18-4_all.deb to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd-doc_3.10.18-4_all.deb apcupsd_3.10.18-4.diff.gz to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd_3.10.18-4.diff.gz apcupsd_3.10.18-4.dsc to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd_3.10.18-4.dsc apcupsd_3.10.18-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd_3.10.18-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Samuele Giovanni Tonon [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apcupsd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL
Bug#344640: marked as done (apcupsd-cgi: depending on X libraries?!)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344640: fixed in apcupsd 3.10.18-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 10:32:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 02:32:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mxout2.iskon.hr ([213.191.128.16] ident=qmailr) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eq6hA-00030Q-W0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:32:13 -0800 Received: (qmail 27138 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2005 11:32:10 +0100 X-Remote-IP: 213.191.142.122 Received: from unknown (HELO mx.iskon.hr) (213.191.142.122) by mxout2.iskon.hr with SMTP; 24 Dec 2005 11:32:10 +0100 Received: (qmail 4885 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2005 11:32:10 +0100 X-Remote-IP: 213.191.139.250 Received: from atlas.iskon.hr (213.191.139.250) by mx.iskon.hr with SMTP; 24 Dec 2005 11:32:10 +0100 Received: (qmail 6125 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Dec 2005 11:32:09 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Zlatko Calusic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apcupsd-cgi: depending on X libraries?! Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:32:09 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: apcupsd-cgi Version: 3.10.18-3 Severity: minor Up to this version of the package it was depending on libgd2-noxpm, but this new version depends on libgd2-xpm which would install half of the X libraries on the server which definitely doesn't need them. Could this be reverted to the previous behaviour, please? --- Received: (at 344640-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 13:41:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 05:41:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErEvu-00047b-Kf; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800 From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344640: fixed in apcupsd 3.10.18-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: apcupsd Source-Version: 3.10.18-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apcupsd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apcupsd-cgi_3.10.18-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd-cgi_3.10.18-4_i386.deb apcupsd-doc_3.10.18-4_all.deb to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd-doc_3.10.18-4_all.deb apcupsd_3.10.18-4.diff.gz to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd_3.10.18-4.diff.gz apcupsd_3.10.18-4.dsc to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd_3.10.18-4.dsc apcupsd_3.10.18-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd_3.10.18-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Samuele Giovanni Tonon [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apcupsd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:20:18 +0100 Source: apcupsd Binary: apcupsd-doc apcupsd-cgi apcupsd Architecture: source i386 all Version: 3.10.18-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Samuele Giovanni Tonon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Samuele Giovanni Tonon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apcupsd- APC UPS Power Management apcupsd-cgi - Cgi for APC UPS Power Management apcupsd-doc - Documentation for
Bug#344757: marked as done (apcupsd: example client.c cannot be compiled)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:32:06 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344757: fixed in apcupsd 3.10.18-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2005 17:10:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 25 09:10:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail-ale01.alestra.net.mx ([207.248.224.149])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EqZOc-0005gj-6v
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:10:58 -0800
Received: from av-as1.alestra.net.mx (207.248.224.148) by
mail-ale01.alestra.net.mx (6.7.019)
id 439DDABA004D1FD2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:18:01
-0600
Received: from [200.57.201.79] (unknown [200.57.201.79])
by av-as1.alestra.net.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:10:39 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:10:18 -0600
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apcupsd: example client.c cannot be compiled
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: apcupsd
Version: 3.10.17-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Example client.c cannot be compiled as supplied in the examples dir.
I downloaded the source and added the code necessary to compile it.
BTW thanks for maintaining apcupsd: it's the reason I picked an APC product.
Regards,
Hugo
===
--- client.c2003-11-26 09:54:46.0 -0600
+++ do_apcups_client.cpp2005-12-25 07:33:12.0 -0600
@@ -17,15 +17,34 @@
* For additional examples of code, see cgi/upsfetch.c
*/
-#include apc.h
+// 12/25/2005 - Changed by Hugo Vanwoerkom to compile + run on Debian
Sarge.
+
+#include stdio.h
+#include stdlib.h
+#include stdarg.h
+#include string.h
+#include errno.h
+#include netdb.h
+#include arpa/inet.h
+#include unistd.h
-#ifdef HAVE_NISLIB
/* Default values, can be changed on command line */
#define SERV_TCP_PORT 3551
#define SERV_HOST_ADDR 127.0.0.1
-void handle_client();
+//Only working parms:
+//127.0.0.1:3551 status
+//127.0.0.1:3551 events
+
+
+void handle_client(FILE *fp, int sockfd, char *cmd);
+int net_open(char *host, char *service, int port);
+int net_recv(int sockfd, char *buff, int maxlen);
+int net_send(int sockfd, char *buff, int len);
+void net_close(int sockfd);
+int asnprintf(char *str, size_t size, const char *fmt, ...);
+void (*error_out)(const char *file, int line, const char *fmt,...);
extern int net_errno;
@@ -66,6 +85,7 @@
error_abort(msg);
}
+//printf(%d %s\n,__LINE__,__FILE__);
handle_client(stdin, sockfd, cmd); /* do it all */
net_close(sockfd);
exit(0);
@@ -83,39 +103,265 @@
void handle_client(FILE *fp, int sockfd, char *cmd)
{
- int n;
- char sendline[MAXLINE];
- char recvline[MAXLINE+1];
- int quit = 0;
-
- while (!quit) {
- if (cmd) {
-strcpy(sendline, cmd); /* one shot command */
-quit = 1;
- } else if (fgets(sendline, MAXLINE, fp) == NULL) {
-break;
- }
- n = strlen(sendline);
- if (net_send(sockfd, sendline, n) != n)
- error_abort(handle_client: write error on socket);
-
- while ((n = net_recv(sockfd, recvline, sizeof(recvline))) 0) {
- recvline[n] = 0;
- fputs(recvline, stdout);
- }
- if (n 0) {
-char msg[200];
- sprintf(msg, handle_client: net_recv error: %s\n,
strerror(net_errno));
-error_abort(msg);
- }
- }
+int n;
+char sendline[MAXLINE];
+char recvline[MAXLINE+1];
+int quit = 0;
+
+while (!quit) {
+ if (cmd) {
+ strcpy(sendline, cmd); /* one shot command */
+ quit = 1;
+// It's never NULL:
+// } else if (fgets(sendline, MAXLINE, fp) == NULL) {
+// break;
+// }
+ }
+ else {
+ fgets(sendline, MAXLINE, fp);
+ if (strlen (sendline)
Bug#344778: marked as done (debsecan: typo in message concerning obsolete packages)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:47:05 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344778: fixed in debsecan 0.3.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2005 03:38:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 25 19:38:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jlefevre.net1.nerim.net ([80.65.226.245] helo=ay.vinc17.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqjBY-00055f-3P for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:38:08 -0800 Received: from lefevre by ay.vinc17.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1EqjBW-wL-4v; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:38:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:38:05 +0100 From: Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debsecan: typo in message concerning obsolete packages Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 X-Mailer-Info: http://www.vinc17.org/mutt/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-vl-20051224 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: debsecan Version: 0.3.1 Severity: minor The following message: Note that some packages were marked as obsolete. To deal with the vulnerabilities in them, you need to remove them. Before you ca do this, you may have to upgrade other packages depending on them. has a typo: s/ca/can/. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (900, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-20050829 Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages debsecan depends on: ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages debsecan recommends: ii cron 3.0pl1-92 management of regular background p ii exim4 4.60-1 metapackage to ease exim MTA (v4) ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-tran 4.60-1 lightweight exim MTA (v4) daemon -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 344778-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 13:50:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 05:50:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErFAP-0004v6-TM; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:47:05 -0800 From: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344778: fixed in debsecan 0.3.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:47:05 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: debsecan Source-Version: 0.3.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debsecan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debsecan_0.3.2.dsc to pool/main/d/debsecan/debsecan_0.3.2.dsc debsecan_0.3.2.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debsecan/debsecan_0.3.2.tar.gz debsecan_0.3.2_all.deb to pool/main/d/debsecan/debsecan_0.3.2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated debsecan package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:23:03 +0100 Source: debsecan Binary: debsecan Architecture: source all Version: 0.3.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:
Bug#344893: marked as done (ITP: xarchiver - GTK frontend for most used compression tools)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:57:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 11:27:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 03:27:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from panthera-systems.net ([213.239.209.134]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErCyz-0007wa-2W for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:27:09 -0800 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (217-162-105-148.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.105.148]) by panthera-systems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7172DC004 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:26:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:27:00 +0100 From: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Panthera Systems User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: xarchiver - GTK frontend for most used compression tools X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: xarchiver Version:0.3 URL:http://xarchiver.sf.net/ License:GPL2+ Description:GTK frontend for most used compression tools JFTR: Package is ready at http://archive.daniel-baumann.ch/debian/packages/xarchiver/ and will be uploaded soon.. and it is not the same as xarchive. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ --- Received: (at 344893-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 13:57:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 05:57:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from panthera-systems.net ([213.239.209.134]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErFK3-00061K-Tn for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:57:04 -0800 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (217-162-105-148.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.105.148]) by panthera-systems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D702DC004 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:56:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:57:00 +0100 From: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Panthera Systems User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Closed as I am hijacking #344312. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#275662: marked as done (openswan: ssh through tunnel triggers kernel pmtu discovery with kernel 2.4 native ipsec support)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:23:45 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug no longer present as reported by user has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2004 12:12:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 09 05:12:36 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from starburst.bimseln.de [217.69.80.99] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CGG5T-0008Hz-00; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 05:12:35 -0700 Received: from omega.sprocloud.vpn ([192.168.104.254] ident=mail) by starburst.bimseln.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CGG5R-0002lb-00; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 14:12:34 +0200 Received: from chojin by omega.sprocloud.vpn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CGG5o-00014N-00; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 14:12:56 +0200 Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 14:12:55 +0200 From: Marc H. Thoben [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openswan: ssh through tunnel triggers kernel pmtu discovery with kernel 2.4 native ipsec support Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: openswan Version: 2.1.3-1 Severity: important Hi there, this is my first bug report to debian ever. Please tell me, if I missed or messed up somehting. I've been using ipsec tunnels for quite a while, but since I upgraded a few machines to sarge/openswan/2.4.27 I have a serious problem: MachineA has a 100mbit internet connection with mtu 1500 on its eth0 device. MachineB has a dsl internet connection with mtu 1492 on its ppp0 device. Now, when I log into MachineA from MachineB with ssh through the tunnel and do simple stuff (like starting apt-get or mc) that creates more traffic, the ssh session hangs and stops working. I have to kill that ssh session then, it does not recover. On MachineA there is a message in syslog: Oct 8 23:06:41 MachineA kernel: pmtu discovery on SA ESP/9a0f2210/d9ff20ee Oct 8 23:06:43 MachineA last message repeated 8 times Running nmap on MachineA shows: 12:34:24.814345 IP MachineB MachineA: ESP(spi=0xd0f3201c,seq=0x30) 12:34:24.816207 IP MachineA MachineB: ESP(spi=0x1d410c19,seq=0x31) 12:34:24.834583 IP PTP-of-MachineB MachineA: icmp 36: MachineB unreachable - need to frag (mtu 1492) Having a closer look with nmap (-vvv) shows, that some ESP packets are sent with a length of 1496 (!) and flag DF. The problem also occures when I ssh from a dsl machine with mtu 1452 into a dsl machine with mtu 1492 (both sarge/openswan/2.4.27). The problem does _not_ occure, when using the native ipsec support of kernel 2.6.8.1 with racoon on the client side (MachineB). The problem does _not_ occure, when not using the tunnel. To work around this problem, changing mtu of MachineA to the same value MachineB has (1492) helps. But since it is not an option for our heterogeneous vpn structure (with 16 computers, some with ethernet internet, some with dsl that need mtu 1492, some with dsl that need mtu 1452) to synchronize all mtu, I'm at a loss... As a sidenote: Before I upgraded those machines we were using freeswan with ipsec module. mtu has never been a problem before. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-586tsc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE Versions of packages openswan depends on: ii bind9-host [host]1:9.2.3+9.2.4-rc5-1 Version of 'host' bundled with BIN ii bsdmainutils 6.0.15 collection of more utilities from ii debianutils 2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii devfsd 1.3.25-19 Daemon for the device file system ii gawk 1:3.1.4-1 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr ii iproute 20010824-13.1 Professional tools to control the ii ipsec-tools 0.3.3-1 IPsec tools for Linux ii libc62.3.2.ds1-16GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii
Bug#344031: marked as done (Parse error when using file handles)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344031: Parse error when using file handles
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 14:58:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 06:58:02 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21])
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoMSg-Sh-38
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:58:02 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2005 14:57:29 -
Received: from hweidner.de (EHLO hweidner.de) [193.238.104.91]
by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 19 Dec 2005 15:57:29 +0100
X-Authenticated: #322408
Received: by hweidner.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E7FF917D01; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:57:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:57:22 +0100
From: Harald Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Parse error when using file handles
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libhtml-embperl-perl
Version: 1.3.6-2
When using HTML::Embperl, the following embperl script runs into an
endless loop:
[-
open(UNAME, /bin/uname -a |);
while(UNAME) { print; }
close(UNAME);
-]
It seems that instead of UNAME, another file handle (STDIN?) is
read.
The slightly modified script
[-
open(UNAME, /bin/uname -a |);
while(defined($_ = UNAME)) { print; }
close(UNAME);
-]
gives an error message, although it's valid perl code:
[22397]ERR: 24: Error in Perl code: syntax error at /var/www/embperl/test.html
line 4, near = )
syntax error at /var/www/embperl/test.html line 5, near }
close
The same script runs fine when using Embperl-2.0 (i.e. Package
libembperl-perl and handler Embperl instead of HTLM::Embperl).
So I guess it is an upstream problem.
||/ NameVersion Description
+++-===-===-==
ii apache 1.3.33-6sarge1 versatile, high-performance
HTTP server
ii libapache-mod-perl 1.29.0.3-6sarge1integration of perl with
the Apache web server
ii libhtml-embperl-perl1.3.6-2 Library for embedding perl
in HTML
Regards,
Harald
---
Received: (at 344031-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 15:08:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 07:08:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.12])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ErGQj-0002vh-0Z
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:08:01 -0800
Received: from stewie.corp.google.com (stewie.corp.google.com [172.24.0.49])
by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id jBRF7xBn021682;
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:07:59 -0800
Received: from smtp.google.com (angband.corp.google.com [192.168.15.227])
by stewie.corp.google.com with ESMTP id jBRF7vGq020395
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:07:57 -0800
Received: from localhost.inodes.org (83-71-58-179.b-ras1.srl.dublin.eircom.net
[83.71.58.179])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.google.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBRF7irC009358
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:07:56 -0800
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:07 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Angus Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harald Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#344031: Parse error when using file handles
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail-Followup-To: Harald Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp)
Organization: Debian
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - Maruoka)
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary=pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Dec_27_15:05:07_2005-1; micalg=pgp-sha1;
Bug#310715: marked as done (Bug in qgo leading to seg fault. possible race condition?)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:02:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#310715: fixed in qgo 1.0.3-r2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 12:29:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 05:29:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from relay6.mail.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.167] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dav0P-0006Ux-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 05:29:02 -0700 Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by relay6.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Dav0O-yk-LJ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 May 2005 13:29:00 +0100 Received: from oucs-yeates.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.100.122]) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Dav0O-0006t0-3z for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 May 2005 13:29:00 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:27:06 +0100 From: Stuart Yeates [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug in qgo leading to seg fault. possible race condition? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: qgo Version: 1.0.0-r2-1 I'm seeing segmentation fault when I use qgo in specific ways. The seg fault occurs regularly, but not necessarily repeatably. I've attached the stack trace from one of the core dumps. The use of qgo that produces the seg fault is this: 1) Connect to IGS, login and authenticate. 2) Observe many games (often games with many other observers, i.e. high ranking games) 20-60 games is typical. 3) leave the computer (or switch to another virtual screeen) 4) return to the computer (or virtual screen) some time later 5) go through each observed game save and closing those that are finished and minimising those that are not, using hot-keys and mouse. 6) go to (2) There are some specific cirumstances which seem to prevent triggering the bug: (a) if the server connection times out before I start saving games (b) if I only observe one/two games at a time There is another bug that may be related. Very rarely, under similar situations, rather than qgo crashing, many windows close. I'm not certain, but I think what happens is that all the game windows of finished games close, leaving the game windows of other games. All this behaviour appears unchanged for some time (since at least 1.0.3 ?). I've appended a stack trace and my .qGorc file (with authentication information removed). cheers stuart Linux oucs-yeates 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux SIDEBAR [1] COMPUTER_HANDICAP [0] WATCH [BandWson;Garigari;maze;parasite;tafoo;baobao;Big0Slick;dream17;freestep;jiuren;Mexes;NG;tripplest;yiming;zyxw;Skyblue;Kishimen;houshu;PMAKIMME L;carter;lsr;goemon5;sujin;Bensonn;gisei;clouding;Giovanni;megumilk;ORIGAMI;mai010;wd007;angelsan;aman;mizu15;arefzero;AGOPOWER;kentarou;MomoTaro;bsm tw;cto;eoj;Gokiti;yt1202] PREFWINDOW [213:97:846:746] COMPUTER_PATH [/usr/games/gnugo] COMPUTER_BLACK [0] COMPUTER_WHITE [1] DEFAULT_STYLE [Keramik] USERTOOLBAR [1] MAINSTATUSBAR [1] CLIENTWINDOW [427:326:846:615] CLIENTSPLITTER [320:520:243:231:266:208] DEBUGWINDOW [320:307:336:680] EXTUSERINFO [0] WHO_1 [0] WHO_2 [0] WHO_CB [0] FONT_MAIN [helvetica-12-50-0-0-0] FONT_MARK [helvetica-12-50-0-0-0] FONT_COMMENT [helvetica-12-50-0-0-0] FONT_LIST [helvetica-12-50-0-0-0] FONT_CLOCK [helvetica-12-50-0-0-0] FONT_CONSOLE [Fixed-12-50-0-0-0] CHARSET [#.|,-O] COLOR_BK [#ff] VERSION [1] STYLE [0] LANG [Default] VIEW_COMMENT [0] VAR_GHOSTS [0] SIDEBAR_LEFT [0] BOARD_COORDS_TIP [0] SMALL_MARKS [0] BOLD_MARKS [0] ADJ_FONT [0] SMALL_STONES [0] REM_DIR [0] CODEC [0] DEFAULT_KOMI [0] DEFAULT_AUTONEGO [1] HOST1a [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOST1b [igs.joyjoy.net] HOST1c [] HOST1d [**] HOST1e [**] ACTIVEHOST [EMAIL PROTECTED] COMPUTER_SIZE [19] BY_TIMER [10] DEFAULT_BY [10] DEFAULT_TIME [10] DEFAULT_SIZE [19] SGF_TIME_TAGS [1] TIMER_INTERVAL [2] SOUND_CONNECT [1] SOUND_DISCONNECT [1]
Bug#320260: marked as done (qgo: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lXinerama)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:02:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320260: fixed in qgo 1.0.3-r2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2005 21:57:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 27 14:57:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DxtuJ-0004el-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:57:43 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B4062240B9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:57:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D13D2240AC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:57:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id E07A326136; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:57:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:57:42 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qgo: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lXinerama Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: qgo Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, The package is failing to build with the following error: ld: cannot find -lXinerama This is caused by the x.org transition, and you'll need to add a build dependency on libxinerama-dev. Kurt --- Received: (at 320260-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:11:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:11:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHHB-00079K-4a; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:02:13 -0800 From: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#320260: fixed in qgo 1.0.3-r2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:02:13 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: qgo Source-Version: 1.0.3-r2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qgo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qgo_1.0.3-r2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.3-r2-1.diff.gz qgo_1.0.3-r2-1.dsc to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.3-r2-1.dsc qgo_1.0.3-r2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.3-r2-1_i386.deb qgo_1.0.3-r2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.3-r2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated qgo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:47:51 +0100 Source: qgo Binary: qgo Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.3-r2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: qgo- Go client and full featured SGF editor Closes: 310715 320260 340071 Changes: qgo (1.0.3-r2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * add build dependency on libxinerama-dev (closes: #320260) * New upstream subrelease (closes: #340071) * version 1.0.3 seems to have corrected some segfault (closes: #310715) Files: 3b63c985f440706accda431392943a9b 652 games optional qgo_1.0.3-r2-1.dsc
Bug#340071: marked as done (new upstream version (qGo 1.0.3-r2) available)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:02:13 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#340071: fixed in qgo 1.0.3-r2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2005 18:29:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 10:29:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org ([146.82.138.7]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdtwN-0002er-JV for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:29:27 -0800 Received: from natblindhugh.rzone.de ([81.169.145.175]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdtwM-0004mY-7I for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:29:26 -0600 Received: from phoibe.beechen.net (pD9537FE8.dip.t-dialin.net [217.83.127.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAKITNZ2018849 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:29:24 +0100 (MET) From: Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new upstream version (qGo 1.0.3-r2) available Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:29:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: qgo Version: 1.0.3-1 Severity: normal URL: http://qgo.sourceforge.net/ News 2005-October-25 qGo 1.0.3-r2 Due to a change in the IGS protocol, we had to produce this second version release. A couple of tiny bugs get solved with it. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages qgo depends on: ii libaudio21.7-3 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-4 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt3:3.3.5-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Input extension li ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System multi-head display ii libxrandr2 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime qgo recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 340071-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:11:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:11:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHHB-00079M-5n; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:02:13 -0800 From: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#340071: fixed in qgo
Bug#193364: marked as done (Need some way to log spam status in terse form)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#193364: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2003 00:00:15 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 14 19:00:14 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from legolas.drinsama.de [62.91.17.164] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19G6AQ-00015S-00; Wed, 14 May 2003 19:00:14 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4A1CFC4C096; Thu, 15 May 2003 02:00:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from legolas.drinsama.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (legolas [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP
id 25041-01; Thu, 15 May 2003 02:00:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bombadil.xmldesign.de (pD9E4F10A.dip.t-dialin.net
[217.228.241.10])
by legolas.drinsama.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 37674C4C08E; Thu, 15 May 2003 02:00:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bombadil.xmldesign.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 459F61226EA; Thu, 15 May 2003 01:58:44 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Need some way to log spam status in terse form
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 01:58:44 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030314-p2 (Debian) at mucl.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: amavisd-new
Version: 20030314p2-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream patch
I'd like to have some way to log the spam status of a message via
$log_templ into my mail.log file.
I added a %a variable for this, with the following defintion
(added it to %builtins, decl. starting at #5831 - search for
%builtins = ( which should be unique)
starting at line #5861:
H = sub {[map {my $h=$_; chomp($h); $h} @{$MSGINFO-orig_header}]},#
orig hdr
A = sub {[split(/\r?\n/, $spam_report)]}, # SpamAssassin report lines
+ a = sub {( ($spam_level=$sa_tag2_level_deflt) ? 'Yes' : 'No').:
$spam_level}, # terse spam result
# macros f, T, C, B will be defined by each warn_* as appropriate
# (representing From:, To:, Cc:, and Bcc: respectively)
This is not the best solution (doesn't know about user prefs - but should it
know about them?) but it works like a charm:
May 15 01:54:40 legolas amavis[16306]: (16306-01) Passed, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ..., Message-ID: 1483626592prCpr0lwv1gh@, SA: Yes: 23
Nice information for statistics and graph plotting.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bombadil.xmldesign.de 2.4.20-wolk4.0s-pre-final #1 Sam Apr 26
16:26:58 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set)
Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on:
ii adduser 3.50 Add and remove users and groups
ii file 4.02-1 Determines file type using magic
ii libarchive-tar-perl 0.22-3 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file
ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.05-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc
ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.16-1.1 Perl module for creation and manip
ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-3 Perl module to read TNEF files
ii libconvert-uulib-perl 0.310-1Perl interface to the uulib librar
pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found.
ii libmailtools-perl 1.58-1 Manipulate email in perl programs
ii libmime-base64-perl 2.12-4.1 MIME/Base64 decoding for Perl
ii libmime-perl 5.411-2Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m
ii libnet-perl 1:1.12-1 Implementation of Internet protoco
ii libnet-server-perl0.85-2 An extensible, general perl server
ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-2Perl interface to the UNIX syslog(
ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.0-17 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.0-17 Core Perl modules.
-- no debconf information
Bug#199826: marked as done (amavisd-new: Please separate local tweaks from the huge configfile)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#199826: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2003 09:33:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 03 04:33:04 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe.atm0-0-0-120101.0x3ef24ca2.albnxx2.customer.tele.dk (auryn.jones.dk) [62.242.76.162] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19Y0Sd-0006f5-00; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 04:33:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (auryn [127.0.0.1]) by auryn.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B503F2138; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:33:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from auryn.jones.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (auryn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09917-02; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:33:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by auryn.jones.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D1CA3F21A6; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:33:02 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 From: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: Please separate local tweaks from the huge configfile Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 2.18 Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 11:33:01 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030314-p2 (Debian) at example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030314p2-2 Severity: wishlist /etc/amavis/amavisd.conf is quite large, and usually only a few tweaks are needed. I suggest doing the following: 1) Get $mydomain through debconf. 2) Put a warning on top of amavisd.conf that the file is automatically overwritten on package updates. 3) Avoid marking amavisd.conf as being a conffile (or even better: ask through debconf for permission to automatically managing the file). 4) Include this at the end (but above last line) of amavisd.conf: my $config_file_addon=3D/etc/amavis/amavisd.local.conf; -f $config_file_addon or die Cannot find config file $config_file_ad= don; do $config_file_addon or die Error in config file $config_file_addon= : $@; 5) Add an empty (except comments) amavisd.local.conf marked as a conffile. This way local customizations are in a separate file. It has the added benefit of possible future parsing the local file on updating the package and warn about deprecated configuration options. - Jonas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux auryn 2.4.20-ben10 #1 s=F8n maj 4 19:52:38 CEST 2003 ppc Locale: LANG=3Dda_DK, LC_CTYPE=3Dda_DK Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.50 Add and remove users and gro= ups ii file 4.02-4 Determines file type using = magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 0.22-3 Archive::Tar - manipulate ta= r file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.05-1 Module for manipulation of Z= IP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.16-1.1 Perl module for creation and= manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-3 Perl module to read TNEF fil= es ii libconvert-uulib-perl 0.310-1Perl interface to the uulib = librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libmailtools-perl 1.58-1 Manipulate email in perl pro= grams pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.411-2Perl5 modules for MIME-compl= iant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.12-1 Implementation of Internet p= rotoco ii libnet-server-perl0.85-3 An extensible, general perl = server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-2Perl interface to the UNIX s= yslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extra= ction=20 ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.0-18 Core Perl modules. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 199826-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:23:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:23:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from
Bug#239055: marked as done (amavisd-new: use ucf to update amavisd.conf)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#199826: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2004 15:32:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 20 07:32:21 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from port-212-202-175-192.dynamic.qsc.de (server.home) [212.202.175.192] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B4iST-QS-00; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:32:21 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB7560B0262 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:31:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from server.home ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.home [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 23568-01; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:31:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by server.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 47FEE60B0261; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:31:46 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Martin Lohmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: use ucf to update amavisd.conf X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48 Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:31:46 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ferris.dyndns.info Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p7-3 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, after closing #232047, the new amavisd.conf contain the right path but since my amavisd.conf contain a lot of changes I didn't install the new version and amavis still don't know where to look for the socket. Please use ucf to update amavisd.conf by, Martin - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-pre4 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.51 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.07-2 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 1.03-0.1 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.05-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.16-1.1 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-3 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0-1 Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libmailtools-perl 1.60-1 Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.411-3Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.17-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.85-3 An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-2Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.3-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.3-2Core Perl modules. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAXGPiGxxhbGlQyAkRAiHpAJ9qBEtakYAEItLJtGb6g1mfGuxc4gCaAzOG YKbxjizhMZIShII6hewPxgc= =cav9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 199826-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:23:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:23:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHVa-0004L2-7R; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#199826: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level:
Bug#211740: marked as done (amavisd-new: improper handling of 4xx status)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#211740: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2003 19:19:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 19 14:19:56 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from debian4.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.73.144] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A0Pbp-0001ae-00; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:03:57 -0500 Received: from virusscan (albatross [127.0.0.1]) by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id EDA0A20EC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:03:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by albatross.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 1000) id 463FE20A7; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:03:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:03:53 +0200 From: martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: improper handling of 4xx status Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.28 Organization: Debian GNU/Linux X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 kernel 2.4.19-grsec+freeswan+reiserquota-albatross i686 X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin' X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p5-2 Severity: important Tags: upstream The current behaviour of amavis, if the MTA to which it sends returns 450 is better than previously. However, it is still flawed. If I send a message to two addresses, postfix passes it off to amavisd-new as one message, which processes it and sends it back via SMTP, as one message. It returns the error code it receives from the second instance of the MTA to the first instance. If one of the two recipient addresses is not accepted by the second postfix (with a 4xx error), then amavisd-new will not accept the message from the first MTA, and the mail does not get sent to *any* recipient, even though only one of the recipients had a 4xx error. The following should illustrate this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 450 4.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: Domain = not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 450 4.1= =2E0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: Domain = not found The first one is not sent because the second address is not accepted. This is pretty bad. It's better than previously, where everyone else would get the message again for every retry that postfix made. there must be a compromise, no? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux albatross 2.4.19-grsec+freeswan+reiserquota-albatross #1 Mon = Dec 16 17:37:52 CET 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE.ISO-8859-15 Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.47 Add and remove users and groups ii file3.37-3.1.woody.1 Determines file type using ma= gic ii libarchive-tar-perl 0.22-2 module for manipulation of tar= arc ii libarchive-zip-perl 0.11-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP= arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.16-1 Perl module for creation and m= anip ii libconvert-tnef-perl0.16-2 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 0.201-2 Perl interface to the uulib li= brar ii libdigest-md5-perl 2.13-2 MD5 Message Digest for Perl ii libmailtools-perl 1.44-1 Manipulate email in perl progr= ams ii libmime-base64-perl 2.12-4 MIME/Base64 decoding for Perl ii libmime-perl5.411-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-complia= nt m ii libnet-perl 1:1.12-1 Implementation of Internet pro= toco ii libnet-server-perl 0.84-3 An
Bug#263550: marked as done (amavisd-new: new version)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#263550: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2004 03:54:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 04 20:54:30 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-out.estaminas.com.br (smtp.estaminas.com.br) [200.188.191.153] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BsZKo-0002qY-00; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:54:30 -0700 Received: from mail5.estaminas.com.br (mail5.estaminas.com.br [200.188.191.52]) by smtp.estaminas.com.br (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i753rwxo025685; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 00:53:58 -0300 Received: from mail.brasil.net (200141239042.user.veloxzone.com.br [200.141.239.42]) (authenticated bits=0 for user=leoserra) by mail5.estaminas.com.br (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i753rqQD016681; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 00:53:55 -0300 Received: by mail.brasil.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 354373F789; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 00:53:43 -0300 (BRT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Leonardo Serra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: new version X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 00:53:43 -0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-3 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, in 2004-07-04 there was a new amavisd-new-2.0 official release (also known as amavisd-new-20040701), bringing a year's worth of new features and code strengthening. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.10-3 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 1.08-1 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.12-0.1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.33-1 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.1-1Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.411-3Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.85-3 An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-2Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.4-2Core Perl modules. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBEa9GidffdjWZJQERAvC3AJ9I8YCBmQttPaybeJkTFAKQdRRfrACgl5Q4 Nfr0XVwc3V445Zu+3BUkY8Q= =GC48 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 263550-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:20:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:20:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHVa-0004L8-9c; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#263550: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
Bug#284491: marked as done (amavisd-new: 2.2.0 released)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#263550: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2004 18:37:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 06 10:37:43 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fep19.inet.fi [194.251.242.244] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CbNjz-0003C6-00; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:37:43 -0800 Received: from dsl-prvgw1ib8.dial.inet.fi ([80.223.56.184]) by fep19.inet.fi with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:37:41 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dsl-prvgw1ib8.dial.inet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C3F411EC37; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:37:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from dsl-prvgw1ib8.dial.inet.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (juu.ath.cx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10366-08; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:37:39 +0200 (EET) Received: from dsl-prvgw1d35.dial.inet.fi (joo [192.168.0.2]) by dsl-prvgw1ib8.dial.inet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC49411EC36; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:37:38 +0200 (EET) Received: by dsl-prvgw1d35.dial.inet.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1E3E8000F0; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:37:38 +0200 (EET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Petri T. Koistinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: 2.2.0 released X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:37:38 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: at juu.ath.cx Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-5 Severity: wishlist amavisd-new-2.2.0 is released. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.10-3 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 1.22-1 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.14-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.33-3 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.3-2Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.415-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.87-1 An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-4Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.4-4Core Perl modules -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 263550-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:20:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:20:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHVa-0004L8-9c; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#263550: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: amavisd-new Source-Version: 1:2.3.3-2 We
Bug#305711: marked as done (amavisd-new: Option --rebuild is deprecated in cron scripts)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305711: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2005 16:24:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 09:24:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from evolix.net (solaris.evolix.net) [62.212.107.3] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DOeTF-0001C8-00; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:24:06 -0700 Received: from localhost (solaris [127.0.0.1]) by solaris.evolix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A4D6B365; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:22:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from solaris.evolix.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (solaris [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09041-03; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:22:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from leila.gcolpart.com (unknown [192.168.4.121]) by solaris.evolix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2FF6B362; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:22:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id DB6E2439D4; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:43:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 14A63439CB; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:11:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id EE3EA439CA; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 9B09E439CB; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:09:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 48DB9439CA; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:08:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 65F69439CB; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:06:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id B0A0B439CA; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:05:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id E282F439C7; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 899B6439C9; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:47:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 7EEE1439C7; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:01:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 5E396439C9; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:51:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by leila.gcolpart.com (Postfix, from userid 102) id 63E10439C7; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:35:17 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: Option --rebuild is deprecated in cron scripts X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:35:17 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at evolix.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, The cron scripts use sa-learn --rebuild in the unstable and exeprimental packages. But the option --rebuild is deprecated for --sync Then, in files : /etc/cron.daily/amavisd-new /etc/cron.d/amavisd-new please sed/rebuild/sync/ Thanks, -- Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr --- Received: (at 305711-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:23:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:23:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHVa-0004LA-AL; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#305711: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#236482: marked as done (amavisd-new: handling of virus scanner timeouts leads to full disk)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#236482: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2004 12:58:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 06 04:58:53 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from styx.tahina.priv.at (mail.tahina.priv.at) [194.152.163.253] (foobar) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzbOH-0003U2-00; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 04:58:53 -0800 Received: by trumm.tahina.priv.at (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6A87E1B800D; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 13:58:42 +0100 (CET) From: christian mock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: handling of virus scanner timeouts leads to full disk X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 13:58:42 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p5-2 Severity: important when amavisd-new encounters a message which it cannot scan because the virus scanner runs into a timeout, it preserves evidence and sends back a temporary failure. if the problematic message can't be scanned because it's too big (or rather, in my case, contains a legitimate zip file that expands to 250MB and causes clamav to timeout), those preserved evidence directories fill up the disk rather quickly. the solution would be to make preserve evidence a configurable option so one can chose to never collect the garbage. cm. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux trumm 2.4.22trumm+umlska #2 Sun Sep 21 01:48:15 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.50 Add and remove users and groups ii file 3.37-3.1.woody.1 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 0.22-2 module for manipulation of tar arc ii libarchive-zip-perl 0.11-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.16-1 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.16-2 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 0.201-2Perl interface to the uulib librar ii libdigest-md5-perl2.13-2 MD5 Message Digest for Perl ii libmailtools-perl 1.44-1woody2 Manipulate email in perl programs ii libmime-base64-perl 2.12-4 MIME/Base64 decoding for Perl ii libmime-perl 5.411-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.12-0.woody.1.0 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.85-3 An extensible, general perl server ii libtime-hires-perl1.20-4 High-resolution time manipulation ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.98-1 Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl 5.6.1-8.6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --- Received: (at 236482-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:23:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:23:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHVa-0004L6-8t; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#236482: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: amavisd-new Source-Version: 1:2.3.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of amavisd-new, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: amavisd-new-milter_2.3.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amavisd-new/amavisd-new-milter_2.3.3-2_i386.deb amavisd-new_2.3.3-2.diff.gz to
Bug#316105: marked as done (amavisd-new: french translation of message templates)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#316105: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.3.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 14:01:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 07:01:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chatel.calistel.com (obiou.calistel.com) [195.101.28.97] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnGe5-00051y-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 07:01:01 -0700 Received: by obiou.calistel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 76A4D3A; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:00:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by obiou.calistel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B885433 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:00:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from obiou.calistel.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (obiou [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 16528-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:00:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Prem3s.calistel.com (Prem3s.calistel.com [192.168.136.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by obiou.calistel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346561A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:00:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:00:52 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= BOITEUX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: french translation of message templates Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Calistel X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Multipart=_Tue__28_Jun_2005_16_00_52_+0200_Dgw4Jsh85g+hGn0n X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at calistel.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Multipart=_Tue__28_Jun_2005_16_00_52_+0200_Dgw4Jsh85g+hGn0n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: amavisd-new: french translation of message templates Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-5; reported 2005-06-28 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch I've translated message templates sent by Amavis daemon in french (in tar-bzip2 archive joined to this mail) ; Can you install them in the package ? Thanks, Fr=E9d=E9ric Boiteux. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux Prem3s 2.4.27-dev #1 mer mai 25 08:30:42 CEST 2005 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --Multipart=_Tue__28_Jun_2005_16_00_52_+0200_Dgw4Jsh85g+hGn0n Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=amavis.fr.tar.bz2 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=amavis.fr.tar.bz2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 QlpoOTFBWSZTWfqb0uYADEN/ncyYA3Ju9+//zn/3//RECAAIAHBA8AAIYBG/NnrknVXaQdNM 3NzTKUXNrZVSroNd2AB1KQ6ZKCkgoCzISSEEwmmCBU9oU8k9CHtUep5R5T1NkyR6E2oeoaeo8oGy Q9TQDEmgFNUaDJoyMho09QaAAMgGgAPUAAaAA4ABoNDQaADTINDIGmgAAMgAyAyAAkIigUeU2VHq Y0IaNGjQAAABo0BkANAAAOAAaDQ0GgA0yDQyBpoAADIAMgMgAJEQIEENARpkJlT9qTCntTQ0NINo hmoGhkD1NGmgab///EAY0NnbHcl4ZTcCIYNJO4JIK+jv8Y8ZMAQllAAz01cXtifTJTLLfegDSDqA YkWABHb3Hg0m11xoHHkb0cdtOwZb9PzfYwghFZOC7hMzCcXoP4JdUI9NXF+F8jB1uGd/r9qW2ZJk mZgTYeGUW+JliCWorJM6iIOg4d8K9KnhFQyMTxdsWR+4sHSMzadTOhnuNzUsNbkgN2MqmRjHZtho 7Z2t9aIzohcyxwHjHXjIyfp0Z548kf72u80wW1ud4PGJgBhPyAzA+XnAlsBrzhiADcMX+h1kH2F/ sFsL7QgXYU8iZO8DRkjNuq9GmnRDIHyLVhsH+FyY77Pe6lz44W6E+OEnskDpFGV7XqnkzJUwE/fF wBwH1Elwjz4N0ORfe7XLHMz15FD1JdZBfauoklNjMzZdnn3RBUVPkLSLB2C+cmS5exiazmuc3lEo D3DEzvDU9Y/T9Lv8iX0c5uVfkICdeAfXPFuuVfbHzWzaBeLQZDKhsCrylCkHDp0xwRnlTdwBK04c x3dqaMUlP2Tni+exf9NURrSdsobQVGMGBLMNaBIorLwvbFStBeu1xRninI3Omzika1YRZKqKBZnk TSRQMmgoWZWbOa1JYaXuJzV6X1rFKvE3E4ByU4Z9hsYiRQSZA3WFWcWHC0Bni8sBlii1CxDhFe/a oJ0I0sWh763VEr0cj4Hz8S16Jphs7hVCTl92wXu/+LH49Ob8orSVu9HG/7kWOdmqBlnvDhRadi55 BPRU2WqLYmb6FmtWbbzQuPOLzWsegq9GZWCdSxRZV8jjJxGKt+nnzi0t+I3s3zTT9jqBd7bu27Lb uGlY+/OejqtNLxLmgseqTjWHozseDDVZhmKQWGm26sNulUk/QQsW0SsYdPJwY5bdeW+4RbKc3GWK 8aVJEN92koMmyhDAuK5F0w2Z7RNLfjtFkMizJwxY5zFOvjeRm2S9OcC4Cf6/CKEabn3FCqZKeWvR
Bug#334037: marked as done (kuake_0.3-3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: gcc-4.0 workaround needed)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:44:34 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 06:35:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 23:35:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQfdh-0005vU-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 23:35:30 -0700 Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED6116DCE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:35:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE29890770; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:35:28 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:35:28 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kuake_0.3-3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: gcc-4.0 workaround needed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kuake Version: 0.3-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of kuake_0.3-3 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 69 Build started at 20051013-1130 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), kdelibs4-dev (= 4:3.4.2-1) [...] /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/basic_string.h:278: warning: cast from 'char*' to 'std::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar ::_Rep*' increases required alignment of target type kuakeiface_skel.cpp: In member function 'QCStringList KuakeIface::_ZTv0_n36_N10KuakeIface9functionsEv()': kuakeiface_skel.cpp:55: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs. make[3]: *** [kuakeiface_skel.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kuake-0.3/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kuake-0.3' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kuake-0.3' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=kuakever=0.3-3 Patch for the NMU, based on http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg00020.html diff -ur ../../t/kuake-0.3/debian/changelog kuake-0.3/debian/changelog --- ../../t/kuake-0.3/debian/changelog 2005-10-14 13:22:34.0 -0600 +++ kuake-0.3/debian/changelog 2005-10-15 00:29:42.0 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +kuake (0.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * work around gcc-4.0 FTBFS on some architectures + + -- LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:28:36 + + kuake (0.3-3) unstable; urgency=low * Add kdelibs4-dev (= 4:3.4.2-1) in Build-Depends to build with a diff -ur ../../t/kuake-0.3/debian/control kuake-0.3/debian/control --- ../../t/kuake-0.3/debian/control2005-10-14 13:22:34.0 -0600 +++ kuake-0.3/debian/control2005-10-15 00:29:42.0 -0600 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: kde Priority: optional Maintainer: Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), kdelibs4-dev (= 4:3.4.2-1) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), kdelibs4-dev (= 4:3.4.2-1), g++-3.4 [arm m68k hppa] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: kuake diff -ur ../../t/kuake-0.3/debian/rules kuake-0.3/debian/rules --- ../../t/kuake-0.3/debian/rules 2005-10-14 13:22:34.0 -0600 +++ kuake-0.3/debian/rules 2005-10-15 00:29:42.0 -0600 @@ -15,6 +15,15 @@ DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) +GCC4_ICES_HERE := arm m68k hppa +DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU) + +ifneq (,$(filter
Bug#329942: marked as done (nufw: debconf-updatepo has not been launched)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329942: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 15:46:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 08:46:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl [150.254.204.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJCEk-0001iU-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:46:50 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=amavis) by octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EJCE6-00038Y-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:46:10 +0200 Received: from octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by amavis (octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11991-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:46:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from random.kti.ae.poznan.pl ([150.254.204.56] helo=localhost) by octopus.kti.ae.poznan.pl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EJCE6-00038Q-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:46:10 +0200 Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:46:48 +0200 From: Thomas Huriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nufw: debconf-updatepo has not been launched Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 Organization: KTI - Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kti.ae.poznan.pl Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: nufw Severity: normal Tags: l10n In the last uploaded package, debconf-updatepo has not been launched, which means that the debconf translations are lost. I suggest you to add this command in the clean rule of the debian/rules. Regards, --=20 Thomas Huriaux --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFDNXTob8LyHhAYItIRAmsCAJY6keVRrWUcBDVe1w5swVEziw5oAJ4mlt3b DzjaInaQz/rx86vvCLrELQ== =yJvd -END PGP SIGNATURE- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- --- Received: (at 329942-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:50:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:50:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHyf-0005qu-43; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 From: Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#329942: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: nufw Source-Version: 1.0.16-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nufw, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libnuclient_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/libnuclient_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-extra_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-extra_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-log-mysql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-log-mysql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-log-pgsql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-log-pgsql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-utils_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-utils_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nufw_1.0.16-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16-1.diff.gz nufw_1.0.16-1.dsc to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16-1.dsc nufw_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to
Bug#332049: marked as done (nufw depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332049: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:45:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 16:45:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMwTj-0005R1-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:45:47 -0700 Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id DAA4317F72; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:45:46 + (GMT) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nufw depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:45:46 + (GMT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: nufw This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependency to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0 Until this is fixed, it is impossible to use this package with cdebconf, and very hard to impossible to install cdebconf at all. debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper. So if you're using a current version of debhelper you should only need to rebuild your package and review it. If you are not using debhelper, make sure the dependency is modified to allow debconf-2.0 to satisfy it. This bug report was filed by semiautomated means after a trio of posts to the debian-devel mailing list, and you have probably also received a bcced mail about the issue before. If your package's dependencies are correct and it really has some valid reason to depend on debconf alone, please reassign this bug report to cdebconf with an explanation of what debconf feature your package depends on, so it can be reimplemented in cdebconf. --- Received: (at 332049-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:50:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:50:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHyf-0005qw-4k; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 From: Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#332049: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: nufw Source-Version: 1.0.16-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nufw, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libnuclient_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/libnuclient_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-extra_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-extra_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-log-mysql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-log-mysql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-log-pgsql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-log-pgsql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-utils_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-utils_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nufw_1.0.16-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16-1.diff.gz nufw_1.0.16-1.dsc to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16-1.dsc nufw_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nufw_1.0.16.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16.orig.tar.gz nutcpc_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nutcpc_1.0.16-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
Bug#335769: marked as done (Please use gnutls12 instead of gnutls11)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335769: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2005 18:34:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 25 11:34:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from run.smurf.noris.de (server.smurf.noris.de) [192.109.102.41] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUTcn-0003k4-01; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:34:17 -0700 Received: from kiste.smurf.noris.de ([192.109.102.35] ident=mail) by server.smurf.noris.de with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EUTcN-0008LM-Q1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:33:58 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 31660 invoked by uid 501); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:31:08 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please use gnutls12 instead of gnutls11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:31:08 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Smurf-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Smurf-Whitelist: +relay_from_hosts Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Subject: Please use gnutls12 instead of gnutls11 Package: nufw Severity: minor 'nufw' depends on gnutls11. This package has now been superseded by gnutls12. Its development package has been renamed to libgnutls-dev. We'd like to remove gnutls11 from Etch. So, please check whether you can build-depend on libgnutls-dev, and if so, upload a new version of nufw. If your package build-deps on libgnutls11-dev | libgnutls-dev, either drop libgnutls11-dev, or swap them around so that libgnutls-dev is first. If there are problems, don't hesitate to ask for assistance. Thank you. NB: The severity of this bug will probably be increased as we get closer to releasing Etch. --- Received: (at 335769-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:50:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:50:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHyf-0005r1-6J; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 From: Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#335769: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: nufw Source-Version: 1.0.16-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nufw, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libnuclient_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/libnuclient_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-extra_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-extra_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-log-mysql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-log-mysql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-log-pgsql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-log-pgsql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-utils_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-utils_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nufw_1.0.16-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16-1.diff.gz nufw_1.0.16-1.dsc to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16-1.dsc nufw_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nufw_1.0.16.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nufw/nufw_1.0.16.orig.tar.gz nutcpc_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nutcpc_1.0.16-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated nufw package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#332575: marked as done ([intl:fr] nufw debconf templates translation)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332575: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 06:42:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 23:42:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail21.bluewin.ch [195.186.18.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENlvt-00077U-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:42:17 -0700 Received: from pontapreta.maison.mrs (195.186.192.233) by mail21.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.2.066) id 434430D20003E8B5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 06:41:25 + From: steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Frontloop To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [intl:fr] nufw debconf templates translation Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 08:40:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary=Boundary-00=_mhhRDK5KXc+dNdo Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --Boundary-00=_mhhRDK5KXc+dNdo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: nufw Version: 1.0.11-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n Patch Hi, Please find attached the french debconf templates translation, proofread by the debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors. This file should be put as debian/po/fr.po in your package build tree. Regards steve --Boundary-00=_mhhRDK5KXc+dNdo Content-Type: application/x-gettext; name=fr.po Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=fr.po # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to #this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # #Some information specific to po-debconf are available at #/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # #Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: nufw_1.0.11-1\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] POT-Creation-Date: 2005-09-24 17:37+0200\n PO-Revision-Date: 2005-09-24 19:01+0100\n Last-Translator: Steve Petruzzello [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n Language-Team: French debian-l10n-french@lists.debian.org\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-15\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n X-Poedit-Language: French\n X-Poedit-SourceCharset: iso-8859-15\n #. Type: boolean #: ../nuauth.templates:4 msgid Should nuauth daemon be started at boot time? msgstr Faut-il lancer le d=E9mon nuauth au d=E9marrage de l'ordinateur=A0? #. Type: boolean #: ../nuauth.templates:4 msgid Choose \True\ if you want Nuauth to be automatically started at boot tim= e. If you choose \False\ you can start nuauth by hand, by running /usr/sbin= / nuauth with appropriate options. msgstr Choisissez cette option si vous d=E9sirez que Nuauth d=E9marre automatique= ment avec l'ordinateur. Dans le cas contraire vous pourrez d=E9marrer Nuauth vo= us- m=EAme avec la commande /usr/sbin/nuauth et les options appropri=E9es. #. Type: select #: ../nuauth.templates:11 ../nufw.templates:11 msgid v, vv, vvv, , v, vv, vvv, msgstr v, vv, vvv, , v, vv, vvv, #. Type: select #: ../nuauth.templates:13 msgid Nuauth daemon verbosity level msgstr Niveau de verbosit=E9 du d=E9mon Nuauth=A0: #. Type: select #: ../nuauth.templates:13 msgid The more \v\s are passed at nuauth startup, the more verbose daemon logs= will be. A good production value is \vv\, increase it to get more detail= s in case of problems. msgstr Le nombre de =AB=A0v=A0=BB utilis=E9 comme option de nuauth correspond au = niveau de verbosit=E9. Une bonne valeur pour un environnement de production est =AB= =A0vv=A0=BB. En cas de probl=E8me augmentez cette valeur pour obtenir plus de d=E9tails= =2E #. Type: string #: ../nuauth.templates:20 msgid nuauth msgstr nuauth #. Type: string #: ../nuauth.templates:21 msgid User that runs Nuauth msgstr Utilisateur ex=E9cutant
Bug#336780: marked as done (nufw: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#336780: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 13:47:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 05:47:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (mail.lidkoping.net) [213.132.115.138] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EWwUU-00013y-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 05:47:54 -0800 Received: (qmail 14886 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Nov 2005 14:47:20 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1574152716== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel Nylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nufw: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:47:20 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1574152716== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: nufw Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Here is the swedish translation for the debconf template for nufw -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --===1574152716== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=nufw_1.0.13-1_sv.po # Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext # documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to # this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # Some information specific to po-debconf are available at # /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # , fuzzy # # msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: nufw 1.0.13-1\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n POT-Creation-Date: 2005-04-04 22:48+0200\n PO-Revision-Date: 2005-11-01 14:46+0100\n Last-Translator: Daniel Nylander [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n Language-Team: Swedish [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n X-Poedit-Language: Swedish\n X-Poedit-Country: SWEDEN\n #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../nuauth.templates:4 msgid Should nuauth daemon be started at boot time? msgstr Ska nuauth-demonen startas vid uppstart? #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../nuauth.templates:4 msgid Choose \True\ if you want Nuauth to be automatically started at boot time. If you choose \False\ you can start nuauth by hand, by running /usr/sbin/nuauth with appropriate options. msgstr Välj \True\ om du vill att Nuauth ska startas automatiskt vid systemets uppstart. Om du väljer \False\ kan du starta nuauth manuellt genom att köra /usr/sbin/nuauth med lämpliga flaggor. #. Type: select #. Choices #: ../nuauth.templates:11 #: ../nufw.templates:11 msgid v, vv, vvv, , v, vv, vvv, msgstr v, vv, vvv, , v, vv, vvv, #. Type: select #. Description #: ../nuauth.templates:13 msgid Nuauth daemon verbosity level msgstr Nuauth-demonens informationsnivå #. Type: select #. Description #: ../nuauth.templates:13 msgid The more \v\s are passed at nuauth startup, the more verbose daemon logs will be. A good production value is \vv\, increase it to get more details in case of problems. msgstr Ju fler \v\ som anges vid uppstarten av nuauth, ju mer informativa blir demonens loggar. Ett bra värde för produktionsmiljö är \vv\, öka den för att få mer detaljer om problem uppstår. #. Type: string #. Default #: ../nuauth.templates:20 msgid nobody msgstr nobody #. Type: string #. Description #: ../nuauth.templates:21 msgid Nuauth user msgstr Nuauth användare #. Type: string #. Description #: ../nuauth.templates:21 msgid Nuauth doesn't need root (uid 0)
Bug#341544: marked as done (CVE-2005-3950: DoS vulnerability through malformed packets)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341544: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2005 09:58:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 01 01:58:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from inutil.org ([193.22.164.111] helo=vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhlCZ-0004Ei-Jc for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 01:58:07 -0800 Received: from wlan-client-332.informatik.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.117.82] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EhlCP-0005Zw-8v for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:57:57 +0100 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1EhlCG-0001cb-Th; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:57:48 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CVE-2005-3950: DoS vulnerability through malformed packets X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:57:48 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 134.102.117.82 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: nuauth Severity: important Tags: security Quoting from http://www.nufw.org/+NUFW-1-16-minor-security-fix+.html: | This is a security release. The NuFW team has identified a problem | that could lead to Denial of Service from legitimate users of the | authentication service. | | The bug was found in user packet parsing. By sending several carefully | badly formatted packets, an authenticated user can cause a denial of | service on nuauth = 1.0.15. The development version, 1.1, is also | concerned by the bug, which is corrected on the svn repository. | | The NuFW core team recommends users upgrade their nuauth installations. This has been assigned CVE-2005-3950, please mention it in the changelog when fixing it. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 341544-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:51:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:51:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHyf-0005r5-7u; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 From: Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#341544: fixed in nufw 1.0.16-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:47:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: nufw Source-Version: 1.0.16-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nufw, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libnuclient_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/libnuclient_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-extra_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-extra_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-log-mysql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-log-mysql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-log-pgsql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-log-pgsql_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth-utils_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth-utils_1.0.16-1_i386.deb nuauth_1.0.16-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nufw/nuauth_1.0.16-1_i386.deb
Bug#300549: marked as done (kuake: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Can't find X libraries.)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:02:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300549: fixed in kuake 0.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 13:44:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 05:44:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DD0il-0001gt-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:43:59 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DD0ik-hT-3T; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:43:58 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kuake: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Can't find X libraries. Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:43:58 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kuake Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'kuake' on amd64 with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: checking for snprintf... yes checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X libraries. Please check your installation and add the correct paths! make: *** [config.status] Error 1 With the attached patch 'kuake' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/acinclude.m4 ./acinclude.m4 --- ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/acinclude.m4 2003-01-18 01:14:07.0 +0100 +++ ./acinclude.m4 2005-03-20 14:34:37.804372598 +0100 @@ -2857,7 +2857,7 @@ [/lib directory suffix (64,32,none)]), kdelibsuff=$enableval) if test $kdelibsuff = none; then -if test -d /lib64 ; then +if test -d /lib64 ! test -L /lib64; then kdelibsuff=64 else kdelibsuff= @@ -6518,7 +6518,7 @@ libsuff= if test x$LINUX_64_MODE = x64; then # Some platforms are per default 64-bit, so there's no /lib64 -if test -d /lib64; then +if test -d /lib64 ! test -L /lib64; then libsuff=64 fi fi diff -urN ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/aclocal.m4 ./aclocal.m4 --- ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/aclocal.m42003-01-18 01:14:10.0 +0100 +++ ./aclocal.m42005-03-20 14:33:27.049022902 +0100 @@ -2869,7 +2869,7 @@ [/lib directory suffix (64,32,none)]), kdelibsuff=$enableval) if test $kdelibsuff = none; then -if test -d /lib64 ; then +if test -d /lib64 ! test -L /lib64; then kdelibsuff=64 else kdelibsuff= @@ -6508,7 +6508,7 @@ libsuff= if test x$LINUX_64_MODE = x64; then # Some platforms are per default 64-bit, so there's no /lib64 -if test -d /lib64; then +if test -d /lib64 ! test -L /lib64; then libsuff=64 fi fi diff -urN ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/admin/acinclude.m4.in ./admin/acinclude.m4.in --- ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/admin/acinclude.m4.in 2002-11-03 00:10:09.0 +0100 +++ ./admin/acinclude.m4.in 2005-03-20 14:33:44.974564695 +0100 @@ -2857,7 +2857,7 @@ [/lib directory suffix (64,32,none)]), kdelibsuff=$enableval) if test $kdelibsuff = none; then -if test -d /lib64 ; then +if test -d /lib64 ! test -L /lib64; then kdelibsuff=64 else kdelibsuff= diff -urN ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/admin/libtool.m4.in ./admin/libtool.m4.in --- ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/admin/libtool.m4.in 2002-10-06 18:30:21.0 +0200 +++ ./admin/libtool.m4.in 2005-03-20 14:33:58.011049673 +0100 @@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ libsuff= if test x$LINUX_64_MODE = x64; then # Some platforms are per default 64-bit, so there's no /lib64 -if test -d /lib64; then +if test -d /lib64 ! test -L /lib64; then libsuff=64 fi fi diff -urN ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/configure ./configure --- ../tmp-orig/kuake-0.3/configure 2003-01-20 01:18:43.0 +0100 +++ ./configure 2005-03-20 14:34:24.543930864 +0100 @@ -5640,7 +5640,7 @@ kdelibsuff=$enableval fi; if test $kdelibsuff = none; then -if test -d /lib64 ; then +if test -d /lib64 ! test -L /lib64; then kdelibsuff=64 else kdelibsuff= @@
Bug#342653: marked as done (lurker: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:02:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342653: fixed in lurker 1.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 11:30:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 03:30:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [213.132.115.138] (helo=mail.lidkoping.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EkgSA-Jd-Sl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 03:30:19 -0800 Received: (qmail 25713 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Dec 2005 12:29:44 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary0233874530== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel Nylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lurker: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:29:44 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===0233874530== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: lurker Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Here is the swedish translation of the debconf template for lurker. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=UTF-8) --===0233874530== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=lurker_1.3-3_sv.po # SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE. # Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package. # FIRST AUTHOR [EMAIL PROTECTED], YEAR. # msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: lurker 1.3-3\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] POT-Creation-Date: 2005-09-04 02:18+\n PO-Revision-Date: 2005-12-09 12:27+0100\n Last-Translator: Daniel Nylander [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n Language-Team: Swedish [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n #. Type: multiselect #. Choices #: ../templates:3 msgid apache, apache2, apache-ssl, apache-perl, none msgstr apache, apache2, apache-ssl, apache-perl, ingen #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../templates:5 msgid Which servers would you like to be configured automatically? msgstr Vilka servrar vill du ska automatiskt konfigureras? #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../templates:5 msgid It is possible to configure your apache webservers automatically in the way that lurker archive pages are available. This requires the servers to have an include dir in /etc/apache*/conf.d, like the debian apache packages do. You should be able to access lurker at http://localhost/lurker afterwards. msgstr Det är möjligt att konfigurera dina Apache-webbservrar automatiskt och på så sätt få lurkers arkivsidor tillgängliga. Detta kräver att servrarna har en include-katalog i /etc/apache*/conf.d på samma sätt som Debians apache-paket har. Du bör kunna tillgå lurker på adressen http://localhost/lurker efter detta. #. Type: note #. Description #: ../templates:13 msgid No webserver will be configured automatically msgstr Ingen webbserver kommer att automatiskt konfigureras #. Type: note #. Description #: ../templates:13 msgid It seems like you have not installed a supported webserver. The script did not detect an apache include directory at /etc/apache*/conf.d. Therefore, the script did not configure a webserver, and you have to configure manually any webserver that you want to use with lurker. msgstr Det verkar som om du inte har installerat en webbserver som stöds. Skriptet kunde inte identifiera en include-katalog för apache i /etc/apache*/conf.d. Därför kunde inte skriptet konfigurera webbservern och du måste konfigurera de webbservrar du vill använda för lurker manuellt. #. Type: string #. Default #: ../templates:21 msgid Local Mailing List Archive msgstr Lokalt arkiv för
Bug#344490: marked as done (lurker: Dependency on libmimelib1c2)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:02:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344490: fixed in lurker 1.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 00:23:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 16:23:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from marvin.ipnetworks.net.au ([203.132.64.12]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Epai7-000552-Mr for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:23:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin.ipnetworks.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67FE7EA59; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:16:30 +1000 (EST) Received: from marvin.ipnetworks.net.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (marvin.ipnetworks.net.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98265-04; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:16:27 +1000 (EST) Received: from gateway.smithings.net (ip210-65-132.cust.bit.net.au [203.132.65.210]) by marvin.ipnetworks.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD3E7EA56; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:16:26 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (gateway.smithings.net [192.168.1.254]) by gateway.smithings.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B748E101808; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:23:42 +1000 (EST) Received: from gateway.smithings.net ([192.168.1.254]) by localhost (gateway.smithings.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14963-02; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:23:39 +1000 (EST) Received: by gateway.smithings.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA775101809; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:23:39 +1000 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mitchell Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lurker: Dependency on libmimelib1c2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:23:39 +1000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at gateway.smithings.net X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ipnetworks.net.au Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: lurker Severity: normal Lurker currently depends on the libmimelib1c2 package which is no longer in the unstable branch of Debian. Please update the dependency on this package to use libmimelib1c2a which is the updated version of this package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 344490-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 17:10:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 09:10:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErIDB-0007Ea-SS; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:02:09 -0800 From: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344490: fixed in lurker 1.3-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:02:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: lurker Source-Version: 1.3-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lurker, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lurker_1.3-5.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lurker/lurker_1.3-5.diff.gz lurker_1.3-5.dsc to pool/main/l/lurker/lurker_1.3-5.dsc lurker_1.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lurker/lurker_1.3-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lurker package) (This message was generated
Bug#341606: marked as done (cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:02:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341606: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2005 17:05:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 01 09:05:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from p50896812.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.137.104.18] helo=localhost.localdomain) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhrsR-0004v7-N9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:05:48 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1BE1097A7; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:05:15 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:05:15 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cryptsetup Version: 20050111-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, cryptsetup depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01. It should be rebuild against libdevmapper1.02 (libdevmapper-dev (=1.02.00-1)). Thank you. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages cryptsetup depends on: ii dmsetup 2:1.02.00-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use ii libc62.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdevmapper1.01 2:1.01.05-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use ii libgcrypt11 1.2.2-1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libgpg-error01.1-4 library for common error values an ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters cryptsetup recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 341606-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 18:10:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 10:10:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErJ9I-0006br-RH; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:02:12 -0800 From: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#341606: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:02:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: cryptsetup Source-Version: 20050111-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cryptsetup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cryptsetup_20050111-5.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cryptsetup/cryptsetup_20050111-5.diff.gz cryptsetup_20050111-5.dsc to pool/main/c/cryptsetup/cryptsetup_20050111-5.dsc cryptsetup_20050111-5_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cryptsetup/cryptsetup_20050111-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cryptsetup package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:55:16
Bug#344313: marked as done (cryptsetup: unable to create map with libdevmapper1.02)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:02:12 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344313: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2005 18:00:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 21 10:00:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from gozer.dminteractive.com ([66.18.16.178] ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ep89X-0001Tg-Gt
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:53:27 -0800
Received: by gozer.dminteractive.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 06F811E89B; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:53:26 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mike Hokenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cryptsetup: unable to create map with libdevmapper1.02
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:53:25 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 20050111-4+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After last nights upgrade to cryptsetup 20050111-4+b1, I'm unable to map new or
existing devices. Only by relinking to libdevmapper1.01 does it work.
gozer:/tmp# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=4
4+0 records in
4+0 records out
4194304 bytes (4.2 MB) copied, 0.047132 seconds, 89.0 MB/s
gozer:/tmp# losetup /dev/loop0 test
gozer:/tmp# cryptsetup create test /dev/loop0
Command failed: Invalid argument
gozer:/tmp# ./cryptsetup-1.01 create test /dev/loop0
Enter passphrase:
A strace between the two look similar, but when cryptsetup should open the
device and prompt for the passphrase, it errors out.
# 1.02
8658 open(/proc/misc, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
8658 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
8658 mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0)
= 0x40017000
8658 read(3, 63 device-mapper\n 1 psaux\n175 ..., 1024) = 48
8658 close(3) = 0
8658 munmap(0x40017000, 4096) = 0
8658 stat64(/dev/mapper/control, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(10,
63), ...}) = 0
8658 open(/dev/mapper/control, O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
8658 open(/proc/devices, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 4
8658 fstat64(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
8658 mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0)
= 0x40017000
8658 read(4, Character devices:\n 1 mem\n 2 p..., 1024) = 424
8658 read(4, , 1024) = 0
8658 close(4) = 0
8658 munmap(0x40017000, 4096) = 0
8658 ioctl(3, DM_VERSION, 0x8096548) = 0
8658 ioctl(3, DM_TABLE_STATUS, 0x8096548) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
address)
8658 close(3) = 0
8658 write(2, Command failed, 14)= 14
8658 write(2, : Invalid argument\n, 19) = 19
8658 exit_group(1) = ?
# 1.01
8870 stat64(/dev/mapper/control, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(10,
63), ...}) = 0
8870 open(/dev/mapper/control, O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
8870 ioctl(3, DM_VERSION, 0x804e328) = 0
8870 ioctl(3, DM_TABLE_STATUS, 0x804e2e8) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or
address)
8870 open(/dev/loop0, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 4
8870 ioctl(4, BLKGETSIZE64, 0xbfa35f10) = 0
8870 close(4) = 0
8870 ioctl(0, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo
...}) = 0
8870 open(/dev/tty, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 4
I found a similar report
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.dm-crypt/1312 on
the dm-crypt mailing list, but noone responded and he said crtypsetup
mysteriously started working at a later date.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Versions of packages cryptsetup depends on:
ii dmsetup 2:1.02.02-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use
ii libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared
Bug#199100: marked as done (compface: xbm not mentioned in Readme)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#199100: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2003 22:49:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 27 17:49:52 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19W22S-QM-00; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:49:52 -0500 Received: from tc210-203-44-51.3-16.pl.ebtnet.net ([210.203.44.51] helo=jidanni.org) by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04) id 19W22J-0003Jh-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:49:52 -0400 Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19Vzfj-fm-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 04:18:15 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: compface: xbm not mentioned in Readme X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10 Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 04:18:15 +0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: compface Version: 1989.11.11-24 Severity: minor apt-cache show compface is clearest. We want to go from .xbm. README doesn't even mention .xbm. The manpage mentions it, but only way down. The readme should mention how one goes from an arbitrary sized .jpg to the final output. I.e. via gimp to .xbm or something. Or maybe gimp does the whole thing already. OK, tell them to in gimp use ctrl / shift etc. during selection to make square boxes, then e.g. convert -scale 48x48 a.png a.xbm then compface a.xbm Anyways, if .xbm is called by other names, not everybody knows, so mention .xbm -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.20-k7 #1 Tue Jan 14 00:29:06 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 Versions of packages compface depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcompfaceg1 1989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 199100-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 18:40:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 10:40:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErJcE-0003Ov-GZ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 From: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#199100: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: libcompface Source-Version: 1:1.5.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libcompface, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: compface_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/compface_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libcompface_1.5.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2-1.diff.gz libcompface_1.5.2-1.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2-1.dsc libcompface_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz libcompfaceg1-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompfaceg1-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libcompfaceg1_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompfaceg1_1.5.2-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libcompface package) (This message was generated
Bug#338515: marked as done (rpm: Bogus requirement generated for linux-gate.so)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:11 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338515: fixed in rpm 4.4.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2005 19:42:34 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 10 11:42:33 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from vanguard.xorian.net ([63.114.52.26])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EaIJd-0002a0-RD
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:42:33 -0800
Received: by vanguard.xorian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6052D2A5E; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:42:02 -0500 (EST)
From: Ken Schalk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rpm: Bogus requirement generated for linux-gate.so
X-Debbugs-CC: Ken Schalk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:42:02 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: rpm
Severity: normal
When creating an rpm (rpmbuild -bb), if running on a 2.6 kernel the
rpm can get a bogus dependency on linux-gate.so. See:
http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2005-May/2094.html
http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/08/linux-gate/
I'm including a small patch to /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires which seems
to fix the problem.
--Ken Schalk
--- find-requires.orig 2005-11-10 13:53:35.0 -0500
+++ find-requires 2005-11-10 13:53:52.0 -0500
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
lib64=`if file -L $f 2/dev/null | \
grep ELF 64-bit /dev/null; then echo $mark64; fi`
ldd $f | awk '/=/ {
- if ($1 !~ /libNoVersion.so/ $1 !~ /4[um]lib.so/ $1 !~ /fakeroot/)
{
+ if ($1 !~ /libNoVersion.so/ $1 !~ /4[um]lib.so/ $1 !~ /fakeroot/
$1 !~ /linux-gate.so/) {
gsub(/'\''/,\\,$1);
printf %s'$lib64'\n, $1
}
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
lib64=`if file -L $f 2/dev/null | \
grep ELF 64-bit /dev/null; then echo $mark64; fi`
ldd $f | awk '/=/ {
- if ($1 !~ /libNoVersion.so/ $1 !~ /4[um]lib.so/ $1 !~ /fakeroot/)
{
+ if ($1 !~ /libNoVersion.so/ $1 !~ /4[um]lib.so/ $1 !~ /fakeroot/
$1 !~ /linux-gate.so/) {
gsub(/'\''/,\\,$1);
printf %s'$lib64'\n, $1
}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---
Received: (at 338515-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 18:41:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 10:41:21 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ErJcJ-0003Pz-I1; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:11 -0800
From: Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#338515: fixed in rpm 4.4.1-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:11 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: rpm
Source-Version: 4.4.1-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rpm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
librpm-dev_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/librpm-dev_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
librpm4_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/librpm4_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
lsb-rpm_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/lsb-rpm_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
python2.3-rpm_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/python2.3-rpm_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
rpm_4.4.1-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rpm/rpm_4.4.1-5.diff.gz
rpm_4.4.1-5.dsc
to pool/main/r/rpm/rpm_4.4.1-5.dsc
rpm_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/rpm_4.4.1-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anand Kumria [EMAIL
Bug#322788: marked as done (finish /usr/doc transition)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322788: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 20:20:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 13:20:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3g0g-JW-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:20:10 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (68-67-225-150.chvlva.adelphia.net [68.67.225.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5979717F0F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:20:09 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8856E6F470; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:20:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:20:08 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: finish /usr/doc transition Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libcompfaceg1 Version: 1989.11.11-24 Severity: normal This package still creates a /usr/doc symlink. This will shortly become a policy violation, please remove the code to do that (rebuild should do it if using debhelper). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages libcompfaceg1 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an libcompfaceg1 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --=20 see shy jo --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC/QR4d8HHehbQuO8RAvaMAJ49bRHyX2Bx9M/b4EogX93tUNNjzACg4PeC L7H7tsVC6vixugh26NYxnJE= =roxY -END PGP SIGNATURE- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- --- Received: (at 322788-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 18:40:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 10:40:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErJcE-0003P1-In; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 From: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#322788: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libcompface Source-Version: 1:1.5.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libcompface, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: compface_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/compface_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libcompface_1.5.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2-1.diff.gz libcompface_1.5.2-1.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2-1.dsc libcompface_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz libcompfaceg1-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompfaceg1-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libcompfaceg1_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompfaceg1_1.5.2-1_i386.deb A summary of
Bug#288824: marked as done (libcompfaceg1-dev: No section specified)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#288824: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2005 20:57:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 05 12:57:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp08.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.149] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CmIDS-0007Eg-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:57:14 -0800 Received: from pc1.driebergenweb.org (c5375138b.cable.wanadoo.nl [83.117.19.139]) by smtp8.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D917E65112; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:57:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from compukid by pc1.driebergenweb.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CmIDx-0003K1-Jl; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:57:45 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary2740147470788566180== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel van Eeden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libcompfaceg1-dev: No section specified X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:57:45 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DRUGSPAM,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===2740147470788566180== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: libcompfaceg1-dev Version: 1989.11.11-24 Severity: wishlist Please include section information in the control file. From the vrms output: vrms: ERROR- Badly formed dpkg-status entry #242! pkg=[libcompfaceg1-dev], pkgstatus=[install ok installed], section=[] Please look at policy section 5.6.4 Patch attached -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libcompfaceg1-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-19.0.0.2.pure64 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libcompfaceg1 1989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai -- no debconf information --===2740147470788566180== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=libcompface_dpkg_status.patch diff -ru libcompface-1989.11.11.old/debian/rules libcompface-1989.11.11/debian/rules --- libcompface-1989.11.11.old/debian/rules 2005-01-05 21:50:50.554225408 +0100 +++ libcompface-1989.11.11/debian/rules 2005-01-05 21:51:07.420661320 +0100 @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ dh_md5sums - dpkg-gencontrol -plibcompfaceg1-dev + dpkg-gencontrol -plibcompfaceg1-dev -isp chown -R root.root debian/tmp chmod -R go=rX debian/tmp dpkg --build debian/tmp .. --===2740147470788566180==-- --- Received: (at 288824-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 18:40:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 10:40:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErJcE-0003Oz-I3; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 From: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#288824: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: libcompface Source-Version: 1:1.5.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libcompface, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: compface_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/compface_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libcompface_1.5.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2-1.diff.gz libcompface_1.5.2-1.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2-1.dsc
Bug#261932: marked as done (libcompface: FTFBS - make up-to-dateness confusion on fast machines)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#261932: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2004 23:44:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 28 16:44:01 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (shiri.gloaming.local) [83.216.141.215] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bpy5Z-0003dB-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:44:01 -0700 Received: from james by shiri.gloaming.local with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bpy53-0006J8-Ln for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:43:29 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libcompface: FTFBS - make up-to-dateness confusion on fast machines Mail-Copies-To: never From: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:43:29 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libcompface Version: 1989.11.11-24 Severity: wishlist Tag: patch We ran into problems compiling libcompface on very fast machines, e.g. libcompface.so.1.0.0 wouldn't be built because make(1) thought 'shared' was up-to-date[1]. Simply renaming the build directories to not match the Makefile target names was sufficient to work around the problem. I'm not sure this is the 100% right fix, as my make-fu is rusty, but it Works For Me(tm). http://aint.got.no-name-yet.com/patches/libcompface-too_fast_for_make.diff -- James [1] AFAICT make(1) couldn't tell the (miniscule) difference in time between the creation of 'shared' and compilation of the $(OBJECTS). --- Received: (at 261932-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 18:40:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 10:40:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErJcE-0003Ox-HJ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 From: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#261932: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: libcompface Source-Version: 1:1.5.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libcompface, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: compface_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/compface_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libcompface_1.5.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2-1.diff.gz libcompface_1.5.2-1.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2-1.dsc libcompface_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompface_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz libcompfaceg1-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompfaceg1-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libcompfaceg1_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libcompface/libcompfaceg1_1.5.2-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libcompface package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:53:12 +0100 Source: libcompface Binary: compface libcompfaceg1 libcompfaceg1-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.5.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Hakan Ardo
Bug#340392: marked as done (Fwd: possible freetype transition; improved library handling needed for all C/C++ packages)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#340392: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2005 07:46:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 22 23:46:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.202]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EepKw-0004lw-A8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:46:38 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so1234050nzf for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:46:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h6hefOXlk4qJHXeoGGoK1ozKR68IBpIJdbVK1Z48cqrc3TLh8S8NZNbhogSJ30O/YJCexUx1LczDehkVthRnG5NRb6KhEoGJ2vM+7Deikby4ZxBRiX8O6sa9FVpUYtYviSCiKoaWSb2oggzRvnvhcSGxLGj6zJUD79e/4Is1Xs0= Received: by 10.65.243.18 with SMTP id v18mr5686270qbr; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.132.14 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:46:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:46:36 +0100 From: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: possible freetype transition; improved library handling needed for all C/C++ packages In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libcompface Version: 1989.11.11-24 Severity: wishlist -- Forwarded message -- From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Nov 22, 2005 11:37 PM Subject: possible freetype transition; improved library handling needed for all C/C++ packages To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org Hello cruel world, Due to upstream ABI changes, it looks very likely that libfreetype is going to have to undergo a library transition in the near future[0]. The details are still being settled, and it's possible (though unlikely) that the library will be fixed so that no transition is needed, but in the meantime I'd like to leave you all with a public service announcement. There are currently 583 packages in unstable which depend on the libfreetype6 package. That means that if this transition happens today, it will be bigger than the KDE transition was; it will be bigger than the OpenSSL 0.9.8 transition was (469 binary packages in unstable depend on either libssl0.9.8 or libssl0.9.7 today). *And it shouldn't be*. The truth is that, although freetype is a widely used library (as the more or less standard handler in Debian for TrueType fonts), of those 583 packages in unstable which depend on libfreetype6, only *178* of them come from source packages which build-depend on libfreetype6-dev. That means that the vast majority of these packages are either missing a build-dependency, or, more likely, are ending up containing binaries that link against a library which they do not use directly. And freetype is not the only library like this in Debian. At DebConf 4, I gave a presentation [1][2] which discussed the issue of brittle library dependency trees in Debian, and the problems they cause over time for a distribution with a decentralized development model. For various reasons, this issue never made it to significant discussion on the mailing lists; this is now threatening to bite us big and bad with freetype, and it's time to raise awareness of this issue in order to try to get the freetype transition, and future transitions like it under control. I would encourage you to read the presentation in question, but I will also summarize here: due to accidents of history, the convention when linking an executable or shared library is to tell ld to recursively add references to *all* libraries in the dependency tree below it. This is wrong for modern GNU/Linux systems when using dynamic linking, because the dynamic linker recurses the dependency
Bug#339706: marked as done (gzip: --rsyncable works only for fixed-size-block changes)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:00:58 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339706: Test shows that --rsyncable works has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2005 06:11:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 22:11:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.bmlv.gv.at ([193.171.152.37]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EczSg-0002Sd-Vt for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:11:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bmlv.gv.at (mail) with ESMTP id D44A26D345 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:10:29 +0100 (CET) From: Ph. Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gzip: --rsyncable works only for fixed-size-block changes Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:10:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bmlv.gv.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 Package: gzip Version: 1.3.5-12 Severity: wishlist The current algorithm for --rsyncable is, AFAIU, flushing the compression buffers every 4k input bytes, causing a fresh compression to start. That works only for inputs with fixed-size-blocks, ie simple byte changes; no insertions, no deletions. To make that feature working also for non-fixed-size-changes I'd suggest using a mechanism like Manber-Hashing (http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/manber94finding.html) to determine where to break the blocks. As gzip already has some CRC calculation this should have negligible performance impacts. A sample implementation for this calculation is in the perl module at http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PM/PMAREK/DigestManberHash/Digest-ManberHash-0.7.tar.gz. My use case is compressing a kernel and initrd image, which get periodically changed and rsynced to a number of destinations. Every time the kernel includes a new driver, nearly the whole rsync image has to be transfered, as any insertion causes gzip to compress later blocks differently. Thank you very much! Regards, Phil -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686-smp Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_AT) Versions of packages gzip depends on: ii debianutils 2.15.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an gzip recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 339706-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 19:04:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 11:04:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from winfree.gag.com ([192.133.104.8] ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErK7n-0006qo-LT for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:04:43 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7589278168; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:04:42 -0700 (MST) Received: from winfree.gag.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (winfree [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02272-04; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:04:41 -0700 (MST) Received: from rover.gag.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BD378164; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:04:40 -0700 (MST) Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7E3D5A7BE4; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:00:58 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: Bug#339706: Test shows that --rsyncable works From: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Garbee and Garbee Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:00:58 -0700
Bug#344911: marked as done (gnus: Saving downloaded mail to temporary files before processing)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:38:13 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344911: gnus: Saving downloaded mail to temporary files before processing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 15:54:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 07:54:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sark4.cc.gatech.edu ([130.207.7.19]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErH9e-0006MO-B0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:54:26 -0800 Received: from tokyo.cc.gatech.edu (tokyo.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.114.15]) by sark4.cc.gatech.edu (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBRFsOEO022639 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:54:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (dhcp-128-61-134-157.bme.gatech.edu [128.61.134.157]) by tokyo.cc.gatech.edu (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBRFsOBQ004823 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:54:24 -0500 (EST) From: Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnus: Saving downloaded mail to temporary files before processing X-Debbugs-CC: Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:54:23 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnus Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 Severity: wishlist Recently, the following situation occurred: Gnus downloaded mail from the IMAP server I use, and it deleted it on the server, since this is the way I have configured it. However, there was something in the mail messages that caused Gnus and Emacs to take up all available memory in the system, and eventually the kernel started killing processes, starting of course with Emacs. As a consequence, all my mail was lost. I could see the new message headers in my Gnus folders, but the message bodies were irretrievably lost. I am not filing this as a regular bug, since I recognize this was an extraordinary situation, triggered perhaps by a specific configuration on my machine. However, I would like to request that Gnus adopts the following functionality: whenever mail is downloaded and deleted from a server, immediately save the raw, unprocessed messages to temporary files, and then process them. That way, at least I would have the original messages, in case Emacs crashes. Thanks for the consideration, -Ivan Raikov -- System Information: Debian Release: testing APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnus depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.65 Debian configuration management sy ii emacs21 21.4a-1The GNU Emacs editor ii make 3.80-11The GNU version of the make util ii ucf 2.004 Update Configuration File: preserv gnus recommends no packages. -- debconf information: gnus/upgrade/pre_5.9.0: false --- Received: (at 344911-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 19:45:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 11:45:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net ([12.107.230.171] helo=glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErKkl-00057O-HU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:44:59 -0800 Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBRJcDgM029976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:38:13 -0600 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBRJcDkd029975; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:38:13 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using
Bug#334535: marked as done (crip: error in cddb submissions with non-ASCII characters)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:47:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334535: fixed in crip 3.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 15:28:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 08:28:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from colleen.colgarra.priv.at [82.150.197.85] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERtNp-000400-00; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:28:09 -0700 Received: from chello080109165251.tirol.surfer.at ([80.109.165.251] helo=belanna.comodo.priv.at) by colleen.colgarra.priv.at with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1ERtNa-0002i6-25; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:27:54 +0200 Received: from gregoa by belanna.comodo.priv.at with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ERtNU-00041g-50; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:27:48 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: crip: error in cddb submissions with non-ASCII characters X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:27:48 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: crip Version: 3.5-1sarge2 Severity: normal Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When submitting a cddb entry to freecddb which contains non-ASCII character the freecddb rejects the submission because of encoding problems. No big surprise, as crip does not set any encoding/charset for the mail to the freecddb ;-) The quick fix below works for my environment but I guess using a variable for the charset would be better. gregor - --- crip.orig 2005-10-18 17:13:42.0 +0200 +++ crip2005-10-18 17:23:46.0 +0200 @@ -1742,3 +1742,3 @@ print \nmailing $cddbfile to $cddbsubmitaddr... ; - - `mail -s cddb $cgy $discid -c $cddbsubmitaddrCc $cddbsubmitaddr $cddbfile`; + `mail -a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\iso-8859-1\ -a Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -s cddb $cgy $discid -c $cddbsubmitaddrCc $cddbsubmitaddr $cddbfile;` print Done.\n\n; - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.200508301710 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages crip depends on: ii cdparanoia3a9.8-11 An audio extraction tool for sampl ii flac 1.1.2-3Free Lossless Audio Codec - comman ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcddb-get-perl 2.23-2 read the CDDB entry for an audio C ii perl 5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii sox 12.17.8-1 A universal sound sample translato ii vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.5 Several Ogg Vorbis Tools ii vorbisgain0.35-2 add suggested volume level for .og crip recommends no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDVRR0OzKYnQDzz+QRAn76AKCgEbngHprwKU157EprbLXtzgw3wgCgh6+s +DCTNOmHRtPQkOrpsnWL2FA= =tlhi -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 334535-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 19:51:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 11:51:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErKmp-0005RZ-24; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:47:07 -0800 From: Timo Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#334535: fixed in crip 3.7-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:47:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
Bug#344564: marked as done (xlibmesa-gl: ww2d's GL usage causes the xserver to exit with sig 11)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:29:05 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in xserver-xorg 6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 19:56:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 11:56:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from port-212-202-37-43.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.37.43] helo=knarzkiste.dyndns.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ept1K-0001xJ-7k for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:56:07 -0800 Received: by knarzkiste.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 0) id B3B71EA2; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:57:00 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1235658041== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xlibmesa-gl: ww2d's GL usage causes the xserver to exit with sig 11 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:57:00 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1235658041== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: xlibmesa-gl Version: 6.8.99.902.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Starting ww2d causes Xorg to crash with signal 11. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc6-git2 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages xlibmesa-gl depends on: ii libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libxext6 6.8.99.902.dfsg.1-1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxxf86vm1 6.8.99.902.dfsg.1-1 X Video Mode selection library xlibmesa-gl recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --===1235658041== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Xorg.log This is a pre-release version of the X server from The X.Org Foundation. It is not supported in any way. Bugs may be filed in the bugzilla at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/. Select the xorg product for bugs you find in this release. Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions please check the latest version in the X.Org Foundation CVS repository. See http://wiki.x.org/wiki/CvsPage for CVS access instructions. X Window System Version 6.8.99.902 (6.9.0 RC 2) (Debian 6.8.99.902.dfsg.1-1 20051116175531 David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Release Date: 09 November 2005 + cvs X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.8.99.902 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 i686 [ELF] Current Operating System: Linux knarzkiste 2.6.15-rc6-git2 #1 PREEMPT Wed Dec 21 21:52:25 CET 2005 i686 Build Date: 16 November 2005 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present OS Kernel: Linux version 2.6.15-rc6-git2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.0.3 20051201 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-5)) #1 PREEMPT Wed Dec 21 21:52:25 CET 2005 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Fri Dec 23 20:52:00 2005 (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf (==) ServerLayout Default Layout (**) |--Screen Default Screen (0) (**) | |--Monitor Generic Monitor (**) | |--Device ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 (PCIE) (**) |--Input Device Generic Keyboard (**) Option XkbRules xorg (**) XKB: rules: xorg (**) Option XkbModel pc105 (**) XKB: model: pc105 (**) Option XkbLayout de (**) XKB: layout: de (**) Option XkbOptions nodeadkeys (**) XKB: options: nodeadkeys (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) |--Input Device Configured Mouse (WW) The directory /usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID does not exist. Entry
Bug#284395: marked as done (abiword-gnome: File - Export gives the wrong gtk file dialog)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:20:47 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2004 02:46:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 05 18:46:55 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.istop.com [66.11.167.126] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cb8tr-0006Cm-00; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 18:46:55 -0800 Received: from localhost (rupert.tor.istop.com [66.11.182.207]) by smtp.istop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC43B2B3D8; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 21:47:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from rupert by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cb8tp-0002Ll-IT; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 21:46:53 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rupert Levene [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: abiword-gnome: File - Export gives the wrong gtk file dialog X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 21:46:53 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: abiword-gnome Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: normal The file selection dialog you get by clicking File - Export doesn't let you type a new filename. The same dialog as is used in File - Save As should be used for Export. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages abiword-gnome depends on: ii abiword-common2.2.1-1WYSIWYG word processor based on GT ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-3The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.0-3Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.8.0-2The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libeel2-2 2.8.2-1Eazel Extensions Library (for GNOM ii libenchant1 1.1.4+cvs.2004.08.10-1 a wrapper library for various spel ii libfontconfig12.2.3-4generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libfribidi0 0.10.4-6 Free Implementation of the Unicode ii libgail-common1.8.0-2GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgail17 1.8.0-2GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-2 GCC support library ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.0-1 Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.7-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.0-5The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.8.0-1A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2- 2.8.1-1The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2. 2.8.1-1The GNOME 2.2 print architecture U ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.0-3The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.8.3-6The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgucharmap4 1:1.4.0-1 Unicode browser widget library (sh ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libnautilus2-22.8.2-2libraries for nautilus components ii liborbit2 1:2.10.2-1.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.6.0-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libperl5.85.8.4-4Shared Perl library ii libpng12-01.2.8beta5-2 PNG library - runtime ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management
Bug#332069: marked as done (plptools depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:32:15 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332069: fixed in plptools 0.14-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:46:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 16:46:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMwU4-0005VW-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:46:08 -0700 Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 38FE617F72; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:46:08 + (GMT) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: plptools depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:46:08 + (GMT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: plptools This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependency to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0 Until this is fixed, it is impossible to use this package with cdebconf, and very hard to impossible to install cdebconf at all. debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper. So if you're using a current version of debhelper you should only need to rebuild your package and review it. If you are not using debhelper, make sure the dependency is modified to allow debconf-2.0 to satisfy it. This bug report was filed by semiautomated means after a trio of posts to the debian-devel mailing list, and you have probably also received a bcced mail about the issue before. If your package's dependencies are correct and it really has some valid reason to depend on debconf alone, please reassign this bug report to cdebconf with an explanation of what debconf feature your package depends on, so it can be reimplemented in cdebconf. --- Received: (at 332069-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 21:41:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 13:41:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErMQZ-0005IL-9P; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:32:15 -0800 From: John Lines [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#332069: fixed in plptools 0.14-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:32:15 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: plptools Source-Version: 0.14-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of plptools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: klipsi_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/klipsi_0.14-3_i386.deb kpsion_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/kpsion_0.14-3_i386.deb plptools-dev_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools-dev_0.14-3_i386.deb plptools-kde_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools-kde_0.14-3_i386.deb plptools_0.14-3.diff.gz to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools_0.14-3.diff.gz plptools_0.14-3.dsc to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools_0.14-3.dsc plptools_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools_0.14-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. John Lines [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated plptools package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
Bug#339251: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:32:15 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339251: fixed in plptools 0.14-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:57:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:57:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ebukc-00079t-HR for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:57:06 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25586 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C96F212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 26075-29 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:04 +0100 (MET) 13918 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:04 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6v4aV009251 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:04 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:04 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: plptools Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339251-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 21:41:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 13:41:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErMQZ-0005IN-AD; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:32:15 -0800 From: John Lines [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#339251: fixed in plptools 0.14-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:32:15 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: plptools Source-Version: 0.14-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of plptools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: klipsi_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/klipsi_0.14-3_i386.deb kpsion_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/kpsion_0.14-3_i386.deb plptools-dev_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools-dev_0.14-3_i386.deb plptools-kde_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools-kde_0.14-3_i386.deb plptools_0.14-3.diff.gz to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools_0.14-3.diff.gz plptools_0.14-3.dsc to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools_0.14-3.dsc plptools_0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/plptools/plptools_0.14-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug,
Bug#285691: marked as done (amavisd-new: Amavis fails to process the first message for a file sent in several messages)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed by 2.3.3-2 upload to unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2004 21:03:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 14 13:03:29 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lneuilly-152_23-1-161.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr (tigreraye.org) [82.127.124.161] (tylor) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CeJpR-0006K3-00; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:03:29 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tigreraye.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF954B933; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:03:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from tigreraye.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pavillonnoir [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27531-08; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:03:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by tigreraye.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 87B744B90E; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:03:25 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Jean-Philippe_Gu=E9rard?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: Amavis fails to process the first message for a file sent in several messages X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:03:25 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at tigreraye.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-5 Severity: important I'm transfering large files by e-mail between 2 PC. I'm using mpack to send them, with the maxsize option to get several messages (of MIME type message/partial). The file utility tells Amavis that the first message to be sent is a bzip2 file. So Amavis tries to uncompress the file and fails, as it is only a partial file. Then Amavis reports incorrectly that the file utility has failed. And Amavis is never able to correctly process the first message. The message therefore stays without being forwarded in the postfix mail queue. See below the Amavis log: Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) Decoding of part-1 (bzip2 compressed data, block size = 900k) failed, leaving it unpacked: Error running decompressor /usr/bin/bzip2 -d on part-1, exit status 2 at /usr/sbin/amavisd-new line 4208. Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) decompose_part: part-1 - source retained Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) do_ascii: Decoding part part-2 (0 items) Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) decompose_part: part-2 - atomic Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) decode_parts: level=2, #parts=1 : part-3 Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) run_command: [4502] /usr/bin/file /var/lib/amavis/amavis-20041214T211901-16780/parts/part-3 /dev/null Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) TROUBLE in check_mail: decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility (/usr/bin/file) failed, status=255 (65280 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd-new line 3853. Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) sending SMTP response: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=16780-01, decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility (/usr/bin/file) failed, status=255 (65280 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd-new line 3853. Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) timer stopped after DATA end Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) PRESERVING EVIDENCE in /var/lib/amavis/amavis-20041214T211901-16780 Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) TIMING [total 11274 ms] - SMTP EHLO: 28 (0%), SMTP pre-MAIL: 7 (0%), mkdir tempdir: 2 (0%), create email.txt: 3 (0%), SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 28 (0%), SMTP DATA: 1572 (14%), body hash: 151 (1%), mkdir parts: 4 (0%), mime_decode: 2112 (19%), get-file-type: 44 (0%), get-file-type: 28 (0%), decompose_part: 7265 (64%), decompose_part: 3 (0%), rundown: 27 (0%) Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]: (16780-01) PRESERVING EVIDENCE in /var/lib/amavis/amavis-20041214T211901-16780 Dec 14 21:19:12 pavillonnoir amavis[16780]:
Bug#238117: marked as done (amavisd-new: README.exim_v4 missing important directive)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed by 2.3.3-2 upload to unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2004 12:39:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 15 04:39:03 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vitelus.com [64.81.243.207] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B2rN1-0005KO-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:39:03 -0800 Received: from aaronl by vitelus.com with local (Exim 4.22) id 1B2rN0-0005Qv-Fp for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:39:02 -0800 Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:39:02 -0800 From: Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian BTS Submissions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: README.exim_v4 missing important directive Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p7-3 The example router configuration in README.exim_v4 should include the no_verify option. Without this, exim will accept mail addressed to invalid users and then complain to postmaster@ about the frozen messages. --- Received: (at 238117-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 22:01:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 14:01:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErMt6-0006i9-42; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:01:44 -0800 Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3B3D2E899; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 9xPgreBYiy+weCvjCJboIzE/55hoKZ8sJTdEsVIs3HGK 1135720899 Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net (c91fc544.cps.virtua.com.br [201.31.197.68]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D062357146A; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E387202C2D; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:35 -0200 (BRST) Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (khazad-dum.debian.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23606-04-2; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 (BRST) Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EB0A9202C20; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 (BRST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Closed by 2.3.3-2 upload to unstable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at khazad-dum.debian.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Version: 1:2.3.3-2 This bug was tagged as fixed in experimental, thus it is being closed now that amavisd-new 2.3.3 has been uploaded to unstable. The bug was probably fixed a lot earlier than 2.3.3-2, though. -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293893: marked as done (amavisd-new: using spam_lovers_ldap in conf prevents daemon from starting)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed by 2.3.3-2 upload to unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2005 17:47:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 06 09:47:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hermes.rz-zw.fh-kl.de [143.93.17.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CxqVL-0006I7-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:47:27 -0800 Received: by hermes.rz-zw.fh-kl.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 519333005055; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:51:16 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timo Veith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: using spam_lovers_ldap in conf prevents daemon from starting X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:51:16 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-5 Severity: important Tags: patch When using ldap for lookup maps and using spam_lovers_ldap the daemon cannot be restarted. If one tries to start it with the debug option the following message appears: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/sbin] amavisd-new debug Error in config file /etc/amavis/amavisd.conf: Global symbol $spam_lovers_ldap requires explicit package name at /etc/amavis/amavisd.conf line 809. The errors results from some variables not beeing initialized at the beginning of the code. Michael Hall wrote a patch for it. Here it is: --- amavisd.origMon Dec 20 12:36:29 2004 +++ amavisd Mon Dec 20 20:43:38 2004 @@ -193,11 +193,14 @@ $viruses_that_fake_sender_re @lookup_sql_dsn $sql_key_fieldname $sql_select_policy $sql_select_white_black_list - $enable_ldap $default_ldap $virus_lovers_ldap - $banned_files_lovers_ldap $bypass_virus_checks_ldap - $bypass_spam_checks_ldap $spam_tag_level_ldap - $spam_tag2_level_ldap $spam_kill_level_ldap - $spam_modifies_subj_ldap $local_domains_ldap + $enable_ldap $default_ldap + $virus_lovers_ldap $spam_lovers_ldap + $banned_files_lovers_ldap $bad_header_lovers_ldap + $bypass_virus_checks_ldap $bypass_spam_checks_ldap + $bypass_banned_checks_ldap $bypass_header_checks_ldap + $spam_tag_level_ldap $spam_tag2_level_ldap $spam_kill_level_ldap + $spam_modifies_subj_ldap $spam_quarantine_to_ldap + $local_domains_ldap %local_domains @local_domains_acl $local_domains_re )], 'notifyconf' = [qw( -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 1.22-1 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.14-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.33-3 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.3-2Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.415-2Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.87-2 An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-4Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.4-5Core Perl modules -- no debconf information
Bug#221929: marked as done (X-Spam-Report header should be a config option)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closed by 2.3.3-2 upload to unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2003 22:50:15 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 16:50:14 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from taz.net.au [203.16.167.1]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AMxcr-000763-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:50:13 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by taz.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B273E140689
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:50:09 +1100 (EST)
Received: from taz.net.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (taz.net.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 07734-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:50:02 +1100 (EST)
Received: from ganesh (siva.taz.net.au [203.12.136.1])
by taz.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58811140680
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:50:02 +1100 (EST)
Received: by ganesh (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2C6172C0CC482; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:50:02 +1100 (EST)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:50:02 +1100
From: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: X-Spam-Report header should be a config option
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at taz.net.au
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.4 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: amavisd-new
Version: 20030616p5-3
The ability to add the verbose X-Spam-Report header should be a config file
(amavisd.conf) option rather than require editing the /usr/sbin/amavisd-new
script. otherwise, anyone wanting the X-Spam-Report header will have to edit
amavisd-new every time it is upgraded.
fortunately, adding this feature is trivial.
first add a line to the amavisd.conf file like the following (anywhere will do,
but i added it immediately before the line to enable/disable Subject line
tagging):
#$sa_spam_report_header = 1;# add verbose X-Spam-Report header (defaults
to undef, disables)
then apply the following patch to /usr/sbin/amavisd-new
--- amavisd-new.orig2003-09-23 08:54:05.0 +1000
+++ amavisd-new 2003-11-21 09:45:53.0 +1100
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@
'sa' = [qw(
$helpers_home
$sa_tag_level_deflt $sa_tag2_level_deflt $sa_kill_level_deflt
- $sa_spam_subject_tag $sa_spam_modifies_subj
+ $sa_spam_subject_tag $sa_spam_modifies_subj $sa_spam_report_header
$sa_local_tests_only $sa_debug $sa_mail_body_size_limit
$sa_auto_whitelist $sa_timeout
)],
@@ -5799,7 +5799,7 @@
if ($first $do_tag2) {
$hdr_edits-append_header('X-Spam-Flag', 'YES');
$hdr_edits-append_header('X-Spam-Report',
- $spam_report,1) if $spam_report ne '';
+ $spam_report,1) if
($sa_spam_report_header $spam_report ne '');
}
push(@recip_cluster, $r); $first = 0;
}
craig
---
Received: (at 221929-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 22:01:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 14:01:44 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ErMt6-0006i9-42; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:01:44 -0800
Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149])
by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3B3D2E899;
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151])
by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500
X-Sasl-enc: 9xPgreBYiy+weCvjCJboIzE/55hoKZ8sJTdEsVIs3HGK 1135720899
Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net (c91fc544.cps.virtua.com.br
[201.31.197.68])
by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D062357146A;
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost
Bug#305428: marked as done (amavisd-new: bug processing MAIL FROM: user AUTH= - breaks postfix!)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed by 2.3.3-2 upload to unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Apr 2005 23:16:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 19 16:16:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from peninsula.shockwave.org (new-insecurity.home.shockwave.org) [69.228.254.38] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DO1x7-0007bY-00; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:16:21 -0700 Received: by new-insecurity.home.shockwave.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 626763806A4; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Traina [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: bug processing MAIL FROM: user AUTH= - breaks postfix! X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:16:20 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-5 Severity: important Hi, if you're trying to use amavisd-new with postfix as a smtp proxy filter, and postfix is configured to announce SMTP auth, amavisd breaks things badly. Relevant bits: smtpd_proxy_filter=127.0.0.1:10024 (pointing at amavis) smtpd_auth_enable=yes SMTP: 220 new-insecurity.home.shockwave.org ESMTP Postfix ehlo xxx.org 250-new-insecurity.home.shockwave.org 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 6144 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 250 8BITMIME mail from:[EMAIL PROTECTED] auth= 250 Ok rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 504 5.5.4 MAIL command parameter error: AUTH= I've checked the source in amavisd-new, and it's definitely not processing AUTH properly. The good news, however, is that it's fixed in the current version of amavisd-new. I see in another bug that you have a sid package just about ready to go, but that message is dated in 2004. Help please? This is screwing things kinda badly for me (I have to change my filtering to not reject spam...). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-686-smp-evms Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 1.23-1 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.14-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.34-1 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.5.1-1 Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.417-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.87-3 An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-4Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.4-8Core Perl modules -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 305428-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 22:01:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 14:01:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErMt6-0006i9-42; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:01:44 -0800 Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3B3D2E899; Tue, 27 Dec 2005
Bug#292941: marked as done (amavisd-new: Amavis does not handle Norman exit code for corrupt archives)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed by 2.3.3-2 upload to unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2005 11:06:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 31 03:06:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ogd.nl (aap.ogd.nl) [195.86.242.122] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CvZO0-0005QB-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 03:06:29 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aap.ogd.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9DF32B28A0; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:06:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from aap.ogd.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aap [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26516-05; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:06:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by aap.ogd.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B58F432B2845; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:06:23 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jelmer Jaarsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: Amavis does not handle Norman exit code for corrupt archives X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:06:23 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ogd.nl Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-5 Severity: important I'm using Norman 5.7 for Unix to scan incoming mail. When a corrupt or failed archive comes by, Norman exits with code 11 (properly documented in the Norman documentation), but amavis doesn't handle this so the mail stays in the queue. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 1.22-1 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.14-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.33-3 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.3-2Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.415-2Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.87-2 An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-4Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.4-5Core Perl modules -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 292941-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 22:01:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 14:01:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErMt6-0006i9-42; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:01:44 -0800 Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3B3D2E899; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 9xPgreBYiy+weCvjCJboIzE/55hoKZ8sJTdEsVIs3HGK 1135720899 Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net (c91fc544.cps.virtua.com.br [201.31.197.68]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D062357146A; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Bug#305603: marked as done (amavisd-new: upgrade to experimental report: error messages w/adduser)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed by 2.3.3-2 upload to unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2005 01:09:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 18:09:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from new-insecurity.shockwave.org [69.228.254.36] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DOQC5-0007nY-00; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:09:25 -0700 Received: by new-insecurity.shockwave.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E22133800A1; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Traina [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: upgrade to experimental report: error messages w/adduser X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:09:24 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 1:2.2.1-1 Severity: minor Tags: experimental I just upgraded from testing to experimental. Looks like postinst should check to see if the amavis user and group already exist and are set up properly (right uid/gid/home/etc) and if so, don't mess with them. Output: Creating/updating amavis user account... The group `amavis' already exists as a system group. Exiting... adduser: Warning: The home dir you specified already exists. The user `amavis' already exists as a system user. Exiting... These are bad and confusing status messages for a newbie. If things are correct, don't say anything. If things are busted, say clearly why. Exiting... doesn't say whether or not you exited well or not. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-686-smp-evms Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 1.23-1 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.14-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libberkeleydb-perl0.26-3 use Berkeley DB 4 databases from P ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.34-1 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.5.1-1 Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libio-stringy-perl2.110-1Perl5 modules for IO from scalars ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.417-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.87-3 An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-4Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.4-8Core Perl modules -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 305603-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 22:01:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 14:01:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErMt6-0006i9-42; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:01:44 -0800 Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3B3D2E899; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 9xPgreBYiy+weCvjCJboIzE/55hoKZ8sJTdEsVIs3HGK 1135720899 Received:
Bug#313015: marked as done (typo in description of $sa_mail_body_size_limit)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed by 2.3.3-2 upload to unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 10:02:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 11 03:02:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dh2p4-000628-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:02:38 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9377564D54; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:02:29 + (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:02:28 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: typo in description of $sa_mail_body_size_limit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-5 Severity: minor The configuration file contains the following line: $sa_mail_body_size_limit = 150*1024; # don't waste time on SA is mail is larger The is is a typo and should be if. Also, it would be nice if it would explicitly say that this variable is specified in bytes. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2um Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 1.23-1 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.14-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.34-1 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.5.1-1 Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libmime-perl 5.417-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.87-3 An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-4Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.4-8Core Perl modules -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 313015-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 22:01:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 14:01:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErMt6-0006i9-42; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:01:44 -0800 Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3B3D2E899; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 9xPgreBYiy+weCvjCJboIzE/55hoKZ8sJTdEsVIs3HGK 1135720899 Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net (c91fc544.cps.virtua.com.br [201.31.197.68]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D062357146A; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E387202C2D; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:35 -0200 (BRST) Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (khazad-dum.debian.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23606-04-2; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:29 -0200 (BRST) Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix,
Bug#255376: marked as done (amavisd-new reload kills daemon)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:28:11 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#255376: Logrotate 'reload' doesnt properly restart amavisd-new has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2004 14:10:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 20 07:10:05 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from av3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.110] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bc31J-0006cS-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 07:10:05 -0700 Received: by av3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id D18A637E89; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE06D37E44 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from balrog (h173n2fls33o284.telia.com [213.64.142.173]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791A337E45 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amavis by balrog with scanned-ok (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bc30l-0001Y6-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:31 +0200 Received: from balrog ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balrog [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15801-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thomas by balrog with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bc30V-0007Fx-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:15 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:09:15 +0200 From: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6gren?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Logrotate 'reload' doesnt properly restart amavisd-new Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Request: http://www.northernsecurity.net/contact/114aa85c.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3367 0D84 444B D5B6 980E 7D5D 1209 639D 114A A85C User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p9-1 Amavis doesnt continue working after logratate has been called, so it seems it doesnt handle 'reload' very well. Replacing 'reload' with 'restart' may not be a beutiful fix, but it works. Patch for /etc/logrotate.d/amavis: --- amavis.old Sun Jun 20 15:32:20 2004 +++ amavis Sun Jun 20 15:29:17 2004 @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ delaycompress create 640 root root postrotate - /etc/init.d/amavis reload /dev/null + /etc/init.d/amavis restart /dev/null endscript } # dpkg -l |egrep 'amavisd*|clamav*' ii amavis-stats 0.1.13-rc1 generate rrd statistics from amavis* log ii amavisd-new20030616p9-1 Interface between MTA and virus scanner/c= ont ii clamav 0.72-1 Antivirus scanner for Unix ii clamav-base0.72-1 Base package for clamav, an anti-virus ut= ili ii clamav-daemon 0.72-1 Powerful Antivirus scanner daemon ii clamav-freshcl 0.72-1 Downloads clamav virus databases from the= In ii libclamav1 0.72-1 Virus scanner library /Thomas --=20 =3D=3D [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D=3D Encrypted e-mails preferred | GPG KeyID: 114AA85C -- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBQNWai9XAsD67qPj1AQJDVwgAtg6wqaVw+C0C+eXssSkxDknXIdWqTOW8 +CaqeVxu2gHbiUNbvEXub+P3WVwGcqL0JACZLQ/+ex6CSnyqRqQ9dz5hvzEnkd7r LBvKEyQre+bA2V4QJLA49fTdfYCB+BepqfFB2kCTqwbfMTpKpXPK7hQR33xv/83t 3JgyjaAQZz99nxUlEtXYnqjkvgTn6qVw2Lqw2hOOaly0AcSLbcjqqPuFRAgkCm50 xO1cwphoV8xZ/Sj/+LhceWLQQbT6VBq1GWDX16xl5W0KeDq6Uw8liAaXPCTviHGe
Bug#344195: marked as done (Error to display non-ASCII tags of OGG files)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344195: fixed in vorbis-tools 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 19:58:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 11:58:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.factorial.ru ([83.146.82.2] ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eoncl-0006iD-RC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:58:16 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.factorial.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 33D6532282B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:58:12 +0500 (YEKT) X-AV-Checked: Wed Dec 21 00:58:12 2005 mail.factorial.ru Received: from igold.factorial.chel (h.factorial.ru [83.146.82.33]) by mail.factorial.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E3F322828 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:58:12 +0500 (YEKT) Received: by igold.factorial.chel (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDBF0117DBA; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:58:11 +0500 (YEKT) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:58:11 +0500 From: Igor Goldenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error to display non-ASCII tags of OGG files Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: vorbis-tools Version: 1.1.1-1 Tools from the package can't display non-ASCII tags in OGG file and display instead. For example % vorbiscomment ~/music/=D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0/2005-=D0=98=D0=B7=D0= =B3=D0=BE=D0=B9/01-=D0=9C=D0=BE=D1=8F\ =D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9=D0=BD=D0=B0.ogg produce TITLE=3D??? ? ARTIST=3D? ALBUM=3D? DATE=3D2005 TRACKNUMBER=3D01 TRACKTOTAL=3D10 GENRE=3DHard Rock insead of TITLE=3D=D0=9C=D0=BE=D1=8F =D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9=D0=BD=D0=B0 ARTIST=3D=D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0 ALBUM=3D=D0=98=D0=B7=D0=B3=D0=BE=D0=B9 DATE=3D2005 TRACKNUMBER=3D01 TRACKTOTAL=3D10 GENRE=3DHard Rock My locale settings: % locale LANG=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_TIME=3DPOSIX LC_COLLATE=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_MONETARY=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=3DPOSIX LC_PAPER=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_NAME=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_ADDRESS=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_TELEPHONE=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_MEASUREMENT=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=3Dru_RU.UTF-8 LC_ALL=3D This is known (and fixed in SVN) bug: some files into the mainstream package missed include config.h and #ifdef not works in its. This is ticket into xiph.org truc: http://trac.xiph.org/ticket/685 This is changeset with fix: http://trac.xiph.org/changeset/10080 --=20 Bye, Igor. --- Received: (at 344195-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 22:20:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 14:20:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErN7y-0007Tk-V4; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:17:06 -0800 From: =?utf-8?q?Adeodato_Sim=C3=B3?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344195: fixed in vorbis-tools 1.1.1-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:17:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: vorbis-tools Source-Version: 1.1.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vorbis-tools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vorbis-tools_1.1.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vorbis-tools/vorbis-tools_1.1.1-2.diff.gz vorbis-tools_1.1.1-2.dsc to pool/main/v/vorbis-tools/vorbis-tools_1.1.1-2.dsc vorbis-tools_1.1.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vorbis-tools/vorbis-tools_1.1.1-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have
Bug#344917: marked as done (Vorbis tools do not use nl_langinfo and iconv)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344917: fixed in vorbis-tools 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 16:42:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 08:42:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from nef2.ens.fr ([129.199.96.40]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErHuA-0005ew-U2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:42:31 -0800 Received: from clipper.ens.fr (clipper-gw.ens.fr [129.199.1.22]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.2/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id jBRGfwos053234 ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:41:58 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by clipper.ens.fr (8.13.1/jb-1.1) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:41:57 +0100 From: Nicolas George [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Vorbis tools do not use nl_langinfo and iconv Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.10 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:41:58 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: vorbis-tools Version: 1.1.1-1 The comments in Ogg / Vorbis files are meant to be encoded in UTF-8, which is a very good thing. The tools for handling Ogg / Vorbis files are supposed to automatically convert between hte user's encoding and UTF-8. I have found that this encoding conversion does not work with vorbis-tools 1.1.1. One of the best ways to do such a conversion on a modern Unix operating system (such as GNU) is to use the nl_langinfo(CODESET) function to query the encoding from the locale settings, and to use the iconv functions to do the conversion. The vorbis-tools do all this right in the share/utf8.c and share/iconvert.c. Furthermore, they try to use the //TRANSLIT feature of the GNU iconv function to use replacement compatibility characters instead of unavailable characters. All this is very good. As iconv and nl_langinfo are not always available on obsolete Unix, and as any portable program would, vorbis-tools build system check for their availability and use remplacement, less efficient, builtin functions if they are not. Unfortunately, share/utf8.c and share/iconvert.c do not #include ../config.h before they use some #ifdef HAVE_ICONV and #ifdef HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET, and no corresponding -D is put on the command line by the makefiles. The result is that, whereas the correct code is present and working, it is not used. Furthermore, it can be noted that the behavior of vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.5 was correct. Example showing the problem: 1. Produce a trivial Ogg Vorbis file: dd if=3D/dev/zero bs=3D176400 count=3D10 | oggenc -r -o bug.ogg - 2. Add a comment to it, using the raw mode: eacute=3D`/usr/bin/printf '\xC3\xA9'` vorbiscomment -R -w -t eacute=3D$eacute bug.ogg 3. Read the comment back: ogginfo bug.ogg vorbiscomment bug.ogg Actual result: User comments section follows... eacute=3D? Expected result: User comments section follows... eacute=3D=E9 Adding #include ../config.h at the beginning of share/utf8.c and share/iconvert.c is enough to get the expected result. Additionnal (irrelevant) information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: amd64 or i386 Kernel: Linux she-seel 2.6.14.4-she-seel #2 PREEMPT Thu Dec 22 13:08:22 CET 2005 x86_64 GNU/Linux or: Linux hellroy 2.6.12-1-686 #1 Tue Sep 27 12:52:50 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Locale settings: LANG, LC_ALL and CHARSET undefined, LC_CTYPE=3Dfr_FR or LC_CTYPE_en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages this package depends on: libao2 0.8.6-1.1 libc6 2.3.5-8.1 libcurl3-gnutls 7.15.1-1 libflac7 1.1.2-3 libogg0 1.1.2-1 liboggflac3 1.1.2-3 libspeex1 1.1.11.1-1 libvorbis0a 1.1.0-1
Bug#343854: marked as done (amavisd-new: Insecure dependency in `` while running with -T switch at /usr/share/perl5/Net/Server/Daemonize.pm line 67 )
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:24:12 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343854: amavisd-new: Insecure dependency in `` while running with -T switch at /usr/share/perl5/Net/Server/Daemonize.pm line 67 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2005 09:32:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 01:32:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp7.libero.it ([193.70.192.90]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EnuuI-0002bn-PO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:32:42 -0800 Received: from localhost (172.16.1.10) by smtp7.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 439D91A3008C85E9; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:32:10 +0100 Received: from smtp0.libero.it ([172.16.1.76]) by localhost (asav10.libero.it [193.70.192.88]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17525-03; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:32:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from scricciolo.mug.xelera.it (adsl-ull-140-154.41-151.net24.it [151.41.154.140]) by smtp0.libero.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001FA333845; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:32:09 +0100 (MET) Received: by scricciolo.mug.xelera.it (Postfix, from userid 105) id 904253E44C; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:47:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by scricciolo.mug.xelera.it (Postfix, from userid 105) id 3C2DC3E44A; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:45:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by scricciolo.mug.xelera.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDFE83E448; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:29:08 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Giovanni Biscuolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: Insecure dependency in `` while running with -T switch at /usr/share/perl5/Net/Server/Daemonize.pm line 67 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:29:08 +0100 X-Scanned: with antispam and antivirus automated system at libero.it Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-5 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After an apt-get upgrade amavisd-new daemon did not restarted with the following error: Starting amavisd: Insecure dependency in `` while running with -T switch at /usr/share/perl5/Net/Server/Daemonize.pm line 67. Thank you. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-powerpc Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages amavisd-new depends on: ii adduser 3.80 Add and remove users and groups ii file 4.15-2 Determines file type using magic ii libarchive-tar-perl 1.26-2 Archive::Tar - manipulate tar file ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.16-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.41-1 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libconvert-uulib-perl 1.0.5.1-1 Perl interface to the uulib librar pn libdigest-md5-perlnone (no description available) ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1 Manipulate email in perl programs pn libmime-base64-perl none (no description available) ii libmime-perl 5.418-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-perl 1:1.19-1 Implementation of Internet protoco ii libnet-server-perl0.89-1 An extensible, general perl server ii libunix-syslog-perl 0.100-4Perl interface to the UNIX syslog( ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.7-9Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libnet-perl]5.8.7-9Core Perl modules amavisd-new recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 343854-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 22:46:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 14:46:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from
Bug#285089: marked as done (amavisd-new crashes on restart: port already in use)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:12:30 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#285089: amavisd-new crashes on restart: port already in use has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2004 15:37:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 10 07:37:32 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ccmpn-00088D-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:37:31 -0800 Received: (qmail 10313 invoked by uid 65534); 10 Dec 2004 15:37:00 - Received: from chello080108252219.4.14.tuwien.teleweb.at (EHLO netcom) (80.108.252.219) by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 10 Dec 2004 16:37:00 +0100 X-Authenticated: #2339339 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Rene Konasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new crashes on restart: port already in use Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:37:05 +0100 Organization: TheStar netCom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Version: 20030616p10-5 Severity: important Hello, I use amavisd-new (the same with the older ones of p10 and the last few clamav versions before) with clamav and spamassassin 2.64 (+ Mail-SpamAssassin-SpamCopURI-0.22.tar.gz) on a fairly unloaded P4 server with postfix as MTA. There is also rule_du_jour installed, which updates some custom SA rules in /etc/spamassassin every night and then needs to restart amavisd-new with SA_RESTART=/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d amavis restart; The problem is, that every few days (1-3) the restart fails at the logline shown below. I tested a couple of weeks ago with a higher amavis loglevel and it tells me, that the port ist still in use. Seems the stopped amavis needs longer to free the port. The problem also occures sometimes with a simple manual /etc/init.d/amavis restart through the shell. I have to explain that there was never a mail in the works at the moment of restart, when it restarts nightly there are no mails +- 10 minutes. As workaround I stop and start it with a sleep in between. SA_RESTART=/usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d amavis stop; sleep 10; /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d amavis start; Sleep 5 causes the problem still every 5-7 days, sleep 10 every 2-3 weeks, seems that sleep 15 is completely stable. Fortunately I use a script for the pid-file to be monitored with cron every hour, so amavis gets started again sometime. 10 and 15 secs seem really weird and long to me. I also tried a perl code sleep X; on top of amavisd.conf, seems there it needs another +3 secs. The log below ist fairly old but the same happens till now, all packages are strictly Sarge and updated daily. Best regards, René ii postfix2.1.4-5A high-performance mail transport agent ii postfix-tls2.1.4-5TLS and SASL support for Postfix ii razor 2.610-2spam-catcher using a collaborative filtering ii spamassassin 2.64-1 Perl-based spam filter using text analysis ii amavisd-new20030616p10-5 Interface between MTA and virus scanner/cont ii clamav 0.80-7 Antivirus scanner for Unix ii clamav-base0.80-7 Base package for clamav, an anti-virus utili ii clamav-daemon 0.80-7 Powerful Antivirus scanner daemon ii clamav-freshcl 0.80-7 Downloads clamav virus databases from the In ii libclamav1 0.80-7 Virus scanner library Sep 23 04:27:02 srv126 amavis[5490]: Net::Server: 2004/09/23-04:27:02 Server clo sing! Sep 23 04:27:02 srv126 amavis[29268]: (29268-03) tempdir being removed: /var/lib /amavis/amavis-20040923T020706-29268 Sep 23 04:27:02 srv126 amavis[28169]: (28169-05) tempdir being removed: /var/lib /amavis/amavis-20040923T005003-28169 Sep 23 04:27:05 srv126 amavis[32408]: starting. amavisd-new at srv126 amavisd-n ew-20030616-p10, Unicode aware, LANG=de_DE Sep 23 04:27:05
Bug#341955: marked as done (ITP: libprefork-perl -- Module loading for forking or non-forking processes in Perl)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:23:38 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341955: fixed in libprefork-perl 1.00-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 12:39:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 04 04:39:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx.brachium-system.net ([84.16.230.201] helo=debian.brachium-system.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eit8y-0002rg-4x for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 04:39:04 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debian.brachium-system.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEFF6B7EB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:39:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from debian.brachium-system.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (debian [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17102-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:39:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by debian.brachium-system.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 683E66B7EC; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:39:01 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jonas Genannt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: libprefork-perl -- Module loading for forking or non-forking processes in Perl X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:39:01 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at localhost Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Genannt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libprefork-perl Version : 1.00 Upstream Author : Adam Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~adamk/ * License : GPL Description : Module loading for forking or non-forking processes in Perl The prefork pragma is intended to allow module writers to optimise module loading for both scenarios with as little additional code as possible. . prefork.pm is intended to serve as a central and optional marshalling point for state detection (are we running in compile-time or run-time mode) and to act as a relatively light-weight module loader. This module is an new build depend for #329990 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 341955-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 23:31:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 15:31:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOAM-0003AT-CZ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:23:38 -0800 From: Jonas Genannt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#341955: fixed in libprefork-perl 1.00-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:23:38 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libprefork-perl Source-Version: 1.00-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libprefork-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libprefork-perl_1.00-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libprefork-perl/libprefork-perl_1.00-1.diff.gz libprefork-perl_1.00-1.dsc to pool/main/libp/libprefork-perl/libprefork-perl_1.00-1.dsc libprefork-perl_1.00-1_all.deb to pool/main/libp/libprefork-perl/libprefork-perl_1.00-1_all.deb libprefork-perl_1.00.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libp/libprefork-perl/libprefork-perl_1.00.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen
Bug#334901: marked as done (Subject: ITP: knetdockapp -- Network activity monitor applet for KDE)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:02:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334901: fixed in knetdockapp 0.66-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 15:53:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 08:53:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hurt.cauterized.net [213.251.133.190] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EScjl-0003sE-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:53:49 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hurt.cauterized.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEDC1B01D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:44:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hurt.cauterized.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hurt.cauterized.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 24741-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:44:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from guffy (32.Red-81-38-131.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [81.38.131.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hurt.cauterized.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6678B1AFC2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:44:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Jorge Salamero Sanz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: cauterized.net To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Subject: ITP: knetdockapp -- Network activity monitor applet for KDE Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:52:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-UID: 3 X-Length: 1545 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Subject: ITP: knetdockapp -- Network activity monitor applet for KDE Package: wnpp Owner: Jorge Salamero Sanz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity: wishlist *** Please type your report below this line *** * Package name: knetdockapp Version : 0.63 Upstream Author : Todor Aleksandrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://pan4os.info/apps/debian/ * License : GPL Description : Network activity monitor applet for KDE A small application that docks in the systray and monitors the activity of the selected network interface and the link status. Supports session managment. Requieres Linux 2.6.x. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Report will be sent to Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 334901-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:11:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:11:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOlb-00076q-E7; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:02:07 -0800 From: Jorge Salamero Sanz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#334901: fixed in knetdockapp 0.66-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:02:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: knetdockapp Source-Version: 0.66-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of knetdockapp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: knetdockapp_0.66-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/knetdockapp/knetdockapp_0.66-1.diff.gz knetdockapp_0.66-1.dsc to pool/main/k/knetdockapp/knetdockapp_0.66-1.dsc knetdockapp_0.66-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/knetdockapp/knetdockapp_0.66-1_i386.deb knetdockapp_0.66.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/knetdockapp/knetdockapp_0.66.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL
Bug#337598: marked as done (ITP: freeloader -- A nice gnome download manager supporting torrents)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:07:44 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337598: fixed in freeloader 0.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 08:28:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 00:28:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.23] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYJPV-0008Fu-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 00:28:25 -0800 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 25A0F1C00203 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 09:27:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from venus.kirya.net (ANancy-154-1-67-230.w81-49.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.49.185.230]) by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 067E51C0029E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 09:27:52 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by venus.kirya.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DEA873E1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 09:27:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from hathor.kirya.net (hathor.kirya.net [192.168.1.50]) by venus.kirya.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D65873DF; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 09:27:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by hathor.kirya.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA7CA20644E; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 09:27:44 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julien Valroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFP: freeloader -- A nice gnome download manager written in python and supporting torrents Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:27:44 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kirya.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: freeloader Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Steven Grafton [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.ruinedsoft.com/freeloader/ * License : GPL Description : A nice gnome download manager written in python and supporting torrents freeloader is a nice gnome download manager written in python and supporting torrents. Its main features are: * Supports BitTorrent files * Command line control * Monitors file system for changes * Sorting by status or progress * Preferences saved in GConf * Drag and drop URLs or Torrents into main window or tray * Supports retrieval from most URLs (ftp, http, etc) * Hides in system tray * Interruptible downloads --- Received: (at 337598-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:11:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:11:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOr2-0002ay-Tb; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:07:44 -0800 From: Julien Valroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#337598: fixed in freeloader 0.3-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:07:44 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: freeloader Source-Version: 0.3-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of freeloader, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: freeloader_0.3-3.diff.gz to pool/main/f/freeloader/freeloader_0.3-3.diff.gz freeloader_0.3-3.dsc to pool/main/f/freeloader/freeloader_0.3-3.dsc freeloader_0.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/f/freeloader/freeloader_0.3-3_i386.deb freeloader_0.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/freeloader/freeloader_0.3.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them
Bug#343334: marked as done (ITP: libparams-check-perl -- A generic input parsing/checking mechanism)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:03:25 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343334: fixed in libparams-check-perl 0.23-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 13:58:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 14 05:58:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ws143.allegro.pl ([217.153.200.143] helo=ws143) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmX9N-q7-6t for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:58:33 -0800 Received: by ws143 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 69548122444A3; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:58:30 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak \(eloy\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: libparams-check-perl -- A generic input parsing/checking mechanism Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:58:30 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libparams-check-perl Version : 0.23 Upstream Author : Jos Boumans [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~kane/Params-Check-0.23/ * License : Perl: Artistic/GPL Description : A generic input parsing/checking mechanism Params::Check is a generic input parsing/checking mechanism. . It allows you to validate input via a template. The only requirement is that the arguments must be named. . Params::Check can do the following things for you: * Convert all keys to lowercase * Check if all required arguments have been provided * Set arguments that have not been provided to the default * Weed out arguments that are not supported and warn about them to the user * Validate the arguments given by the user based on strings, regexes, lists or even subroutines * Enforce type integrity if required -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) --- Received: (at 343334-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:11:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:11:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOmr-00084J-4U; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:03:25 -0800 From: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#343334: fixed in libparams-check-perl 0.23-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:03:25 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libparams-check-perl Source-Version: 0.23-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libparams-check-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libparams-check-perl_0.23-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libparams-check-perl/libparams-check-perl_0.23-1.diff.gz libparams-check-perl_0.23-1.dsc to pool/main/libp/libparams-check-perl/libparams-check-perl_0.23-1.dsc libparams-check-perl_0.23-1_all.deb to pool/main/libp/libparams-check-perl/libparams-check-perl_0.23-1_all.deb libparams-check-perl_0.23.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libp/libparams-check-perl/libparams-check-perl_0.23.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if
Bug#341644: marked as done (onsgmls.1.gz etc.: NAME section too long)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341644: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2005 22:28:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 01 14:28:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from frodo.hserus.net ([204.74.68.40]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ehwv4-0001eC-W6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:28:51 -0800 Received: from tc218-187-25-151.dialup.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.25.151]:4508 helo=jidanni1) by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.54 #0) id 1Ehwv3-000CFc-Bz by authid jidanni with plain for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:58:50 +0530 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please Subject: onsgmls.1.gz etc.: NAME section too long X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:47:56 +0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: opensp Version: 1.5.1.0-4 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/share/man/man1/onsgmls.1.gz Please try $ apropos iso|perl -ne 'print $_\n if length 99' and you will see that many of your man pages have too long NAME sections, compared to usual man pages. --- Received: (at 341644-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:20:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:20:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOyG-00066p-Vg; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 From: Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#341644: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: opensp Source-Version: 1.5.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of opensp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libosp-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/libosp-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libosp5_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/libosp5_1.5.2-1_i386.deb opensp_1.5.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1.diff.gz opensp_1.5.2-1.dsc to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1.dsc opensp_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1_i386.deb opensp_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated opensp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:22:16 -0500 Source: opensp Binary: libosp-dev libosp5 opensp Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.5.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libosp-dev - OpenJade group's SP suite, developer support libosp5- Runtime library for OpenJade group's SP suite opensp - OpenJade group's SGML parsing tools Closes: 138924 170795 208042 341644 Changes: opensp (1.5.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Use new --disable-dtddecl option to turn off DTDDECL support and get
Bug#342800: marked as done (RFA: libterralib -- A C++ library for Geographical Information Systems)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:12:21 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342800: fixed in libterralib 3.0.3b2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 15:32:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 07:32:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [201.29.250.223] (helo=tonhao.no-ip.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1El6iC-0007ny-1F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 07:32:36 -0800 Received: from marcot by tonhao.no-ip.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1El6hz-0001Of-Cf; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:32:23 -0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marco Tulio Gontijo e Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFA: libterralib Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:32:23 -0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm out of time to look at this package, sorry. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 342800-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:21:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:21:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOvV-0004j2-0p; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:12:21 -0800 From: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#342800: fixed in libterralib 3.0.3b2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:12:21 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libterralib Source-Version: 3.0.3b2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libterralib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libterralib1-dev_3.0.3b2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libt/libterralib/libterralib1-dev_3.0.3b2-3_i386.deb libterralib1-doc_3.0.3b2-3_all.deb to pool/main/libt/libterralib/libterralib1-doc_3.0.3b2-3_all.deb libterralib1c2a_3.0.3b2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libt/libterralib/libterralib1c2a_3.0.3b2-3_i386.deb libterralib_3.0.3b2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libt/libterralib/libterralib_3.0.3b2-3.diff.gz libterralib_3.0.3b2-3.dsc to pool/main/libt/libterralib/libterralib_3.0.3b2-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libterralib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:23:05 +0100 Source: libterralib Binary: libterralib1c2a libterralib1-doc libterralib1-dev Architecture: source all i386 Version: 3.0.3b2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GIS Team pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libterralib1-dev - A C++ library for Geographical Information Systems -- development libterralib1-doc - A C++ library for Geographical Information Systems -- documentati libterralib1c2a - A C++ library for Geographical Information Systems Closes: 339221 342800 Changes: libterralib (3.0.3b2-3) unstable; urgency=low . * New
Bug#342564: marked as done (Please package last upstream version: 0.6)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:14:26 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342564: fixed in backup-manager 0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 16:10:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 08:10:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.27]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EkOLz-0005Po-AL for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:10:43 -0800 Received: from localhost (vau75-4-82-226-166-133.fbx.proxad.net [82.226.166.133]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589EB68026; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:10:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.194] (helo=localhost) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EkOLv-0007Dh-6V; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:10:40 +0100 Received: from alban by localhost with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1EkOLw-He-45; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:10:40 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alban Peignier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:10:40 +0100 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.0.194 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: backup-manager: New upstream release available (0.5.9b) X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on localhost) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: backup-manager Version: 0.5.9a-1 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686-hyppo Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages backup-manager depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy ii gzip 1.3.5-12 The GNU compression utility ii ucf 2.004 Update Configuration File: preserv backup-manager recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 342564-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:22:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:22:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOxW-0005qp-Vy; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:14:26 -0800 From: Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#342564: fixed in backup-manager 0.6-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:14:26 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: backup-manager Source-Version: 0.6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of backup-manager, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: backup-manager-doc_0.6-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager-doc_0.6-1_all.deb backup-manager_0.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.6-1.diff.gz backup-manager_0.6-1.dsc to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.6-1.dsc backup-manager_0.6-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.6-1_all.deb backup-manager_0.6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.6.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated backup-manager package) (This message was
Bug#339727: marked as done (Backup-Manager can't umount an unmounted CD)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:14:26 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339727: fixed in backup-manager 0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2005 11:00:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 18 03:00:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.aanet.com.au ([202.63.35.130] helo=aanet.com.au) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ed3yl-0005mu-O5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 03:00:33 -0800 Received: (qmail 15927 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2005 06:10:58 - Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (202.164.206.109) by mail.aanet.com.au with SMTP; 18 Nov 2005 06:10:58 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:11:23 +1100 From: Cameron Horsburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Backup-Manager can't umount an unmounted CD X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: backup-manager Version: 0.5.8b-1 Severity: minor I've recently started using the CD writing facility in backup-manager. I leave a CDRW in my burner overnight, set and forget. Every once in a while I check the archive and I can confirm that the disk image appears to have been constructed and burnt correctly. However, I have been getting these apparently spurious error messages mailed to me by cron: /etc/cron.daily/backup-manager: umount: /dev/cdrom: not mounted Unable to unmount the device /dev/cdrom Given that I never mounted the disk in the first place, I'm happy about this! However, I can imagine that this could be indicative of other problems. Is this normal? Cameron Horsburgh -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDfXCLvoajcVq9gkURAhgOAJ0RKdEGnveHzr1YU1JJniZomJwjOwCcCbRw kpztAWi/T1bVu6BvT+hzN7E= =egHx -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 339727-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:22:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:22:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOxW-0005qi-TV; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:14:26 -0800 From: Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#339727: fixed in backup-manager 0.6-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:14:26 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: backup-manager Source-Version: 0.6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of backup-manager, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: backup-manager-doc_0.6-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager-doc_0.6-1_all.deb backup-manager_0.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.6-1.diff.gz backup-manager_0.6-1.dsc to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.6-1.dsc backup-manager_0.6-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.6-1_all.deb backup-manager_0.6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/b/backup-manager/backup-manager_0.6.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated backup-manager package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
Bug#258370: marked as done (sql_select_white_black_list variable order bug)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:33:46 -0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258370: sql_select_white_black_list variable order bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 2004 05:18:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 08 22:18:05 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from js2.rescomputing.com [198.83.9.120]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Binlt-0002Cy-00; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 22:18:05 -0700
Received: from [192.168.99.201] (dsl093-011-167.cle1.dsl.speakeasy.net
[66.93.11.167])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by js2.rescomputing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E908E45F728
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 01:30:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 01:18:00 -0400
From: Matt Petteys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7)
Gecko/20040616
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sql_select_white_black_list variable order bug
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: amavisd-new
Version: 20030616p9-1
The SQL statement for the per recipient white/black list states the following:
# The SQL select clause to check sender in per-recipient whitelist/blacklist
# The first SELECT argument '?' will be users.id from recipient SQL lookup,
# the %k will be sender addresses (e.g. full address, domain only, catchall).
# $sql_select_white_black_list = 'SELECT wb FROM wblist,mailaddr'.
# ' WHERE (wblist.rid=?) AND (wblist.sid=mailaddr.id)'.
# ' AND (mailaddr.email IN (%k))'.
# ' ORDER BY mailaddr.priority DESC';
This leads me to belive that the ? variable and %k variable should be replaced
with the specific values without regards to the order
of the variables in the statement. I found that if you change the order of ?
and %k in the query the SQL is not generated correctly.
If i use the following statement as the $sql_select_white_black_list value the
bug is caused.
select wbl.TypeId as wb From dnMailAuth mm,
table1 wbl, addressTable wba
where
wba.EmailAddress in (%k)
and wba.WhitelistAddressId = wbl.WhitelistAddressId
and wbl.MailboxId = mm.MailboxId
and
mm.MailboxId =?
order by wba.Priority
This generates SQL such as the following:
select wbl.TypeId as wb From dnMailAuth mm, table1 wbl, addressTable wba
where wba.EmailAddress in ('mpetteys','[EMAIL PROTECTED]','@domain.com')
and wba.WhitelistAddressId = wbl.WhitelistAddressId
and wbl.MailboxId = mm.MailboxId
and mm.MailboxId='@.' order by wba.Priority
Note that MPETTEYS (the mailbox id) is used in the IN condition of the SQL
instead of being used in the = condition. When you use the following statement
for the
$sql_select_white_black_list which has the ? value before the %k value, the
correct SQL is generated.
select wbl.TypeId as wb From
dnMailAuth mm,
table1 wbl, addressTable wba
where
mm.MailboxId =?
and wba.WhitelistAddressId = wbl.WhitelistAddressId
and wbl.MailboxId = mm.MailboxId
and wba.EmailAddress in (%k)
order by wba.Priority
This generates SQL such as the following:
select wbl.TypeId as wb From dnMailAuth mm, table1 wbl,
addressTable wba where mm.MailboxId ='mpetteys' and
wba.WhitelistAddressId = wbl.WhitelistAddressId
and wbl.MailboxId = mm.MailboxId
and wba.EmailAddress in ('[EMAIL PROTECTED]','@domain.com','@.') order by
wba.Priority
---
Received: (at 258370-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:34:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:34:11 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ErPGd-00011u-Hd
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:34:11 -0800
Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149])
by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92606D2D27E;
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:34:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from
Bug#313103: marked as done (amavisd-new: debian-volatile)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:01:21 -0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug #313103: Amavisd-new is not Volatile.d.o material has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 23:17:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 11 16:17:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk [193.162.159.95] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhFE3-0008GO-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 16:17:15 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (cpe.atm4-0-1151209.0x50a0af42.odnxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.160.175.66]) by pasmtp.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A921EC319; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 01:17:14 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lars Juul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amavisd-new: debian-volatile X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 01:17:31 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amavisd-new Severity: wishlist Wish for this package to be included in debian-volatile sarge. Thanks in advance. Lars -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 313103-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 01:01:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 17:01:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErPh0-0002z9-8l for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:26 -0800 Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B4ED2EA01; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:24 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 2XmEczi+nxO7o0rm77/LDQHHW4FcxCT+Mbs78Wa7NAUZ 1135731681 Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net (c91fc544.cps.virtua.com.br [201.31.197.68]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837E257146D; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97223202C24; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:01:21 -0200 (BRST) Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (khazad-dum.debian.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12333-02-2; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:01:21 -0200 (BRST) Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2EDD8202C20; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:01:21 -0200 (BRST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:01:21 -0200 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug #313103: Amavisd-new is not Volatile.d.o material Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at khazad-dum.debian.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Amavisd-new is basically glue that holds the MTA, AV and content-filter together. As such, it can still do its job just fine if just the AV and content-filter (spamassassin) gets updated, as long as their APIs don't change. If it ever happens that clamav's clamd or spamassassin (should it ship from volatile.d.n) break their API, then yes, an amavisd-new update would be required to keep systems up-to-date and working. We will deal with that bridge if we ever come upon said river. For now, amavisd-new has no reason to be part of volatile.d.n. Regular backports are, AFAIK, good enough
Bug#205651: marked as done (zsh: prompt not utf-8 clean)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:17:20 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#139771: fixed in zsh 4.3.0-dev-2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2003 23:13:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 15 18:12:58 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from julius.godisch.de (mx.godisch.de) [217.69.161.76] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19nnke-0003bg-00; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:12:56 -0500 Received: from pd9e84464.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.232.68.100] helo=carlos.godisch.de) by mx.godisch.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) id 19nnkd-0004YC-B5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 01:12:55 +0200 Received: from godisch by carlos.godisch.de with local (Exim/Debian) id 19nnkh-0007KP-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 01:12:59 +0200 Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 01:12:59 +0200 From: Martin Godisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: zsh: prompt not utf-8 clean Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 X-GPG-ID: 0x68DCD606 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 2AB1 9CDD 4BA9 D7FB 6927 5A9E 9A91 821D 68DC D606 X-No-Archive: yes X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Martin Godisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: zsh Version: 4.0.7-6 Severity: normal The zsh prompt is not utf-8 clean. In an utf-8 enabled xterm multi-byte characters will be printed correctly, but backspace removes only single bytes, resulting in invalid characters after one hit (in case there was a two-byte character), and a deleted character after the second. Also the cursor is moved two times to the left (according to the backspace hits), resulting in a partially overwritten prompt. Kind regards, Martin -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux carlos 2.4.21 #1 Fri Jul 18 20:08:44 MEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages zsh depends on: ii debconf 1.2.34 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcap1 1:1.10-12 support for getting/setting POSIX. ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-1.woody.1 Shared libraries for terminal hand --- Received: (at 139771-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:21:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:21:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErP0K-0006m8-Ex; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:17:20 -0800 From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#139771: fixed in zsh 4.3.0-dev-2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:17:20 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: zsh Source-Version: 4.3.0-dev-2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zsh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: zsh-doc_4.3.0-dev-2-1_all.deb to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh-doc_4.3.0-dev-2-1_all.deb zsh-static_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh-static_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.diff.gz zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.dsc to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.dsc zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb zsh_4.3.0-dev-2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if
Bug#138924: marked as done (openjade: processing of catalogs takes too much time in openjade 1.4devel1-8)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#208042: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2002 16:55:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 18 10:55:05 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (alatau.ankara.gantek.com) [195.175.181.61] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16n0PW-hA-00; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:55:03 -0600 Received: from alatau.ankara.gantek.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by alatau.ankara.gantek.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) with ESMTP id g2IGu3G3004764; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:56:04 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by alatau.ankara.gantek.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) id g2IGu13D004762; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:56:01 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Baurjan Ismagulov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openjade: processing of catalogs takes too much time in openjade 1.4devel1-8 X-Reportbug-Version: 1.43 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.43 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:56:00 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: openjade Version: 1.4devel1-8 Severity: normal Hello, I tried to render the following document: !DOCTYPE book PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN book titledcdc/title /book OpenJade was _very_ slow: time openjade -t tex -d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/docbook.dsl a.sgml real2m32.677s user2m20.800s sys 0m10.330s time jade -t tex -d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/docbook.dsl a.sgml real0m7.461s user0m6.970s sys 0m0.500s I tried to strace OpenJade; the problem is that it reads catalog files thousands of times (an excerpt from strace |sort |uniq -c): 2961 open(/usr/share/sgml/jade/catalog, O_RDONLY) 2924 open(/usr/share/sgml/html/entities/catalog, O_RDONLY) 2924 open(/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/catalog, O_RDONLY) Thanks in advance, Baurjan. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux alatau 2.4.17-686 #2 Sat Dec 22 21:58:49 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages openjade depends on: ii libc62.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libosp2 1.5pre5-5 Runtime library for OpenJade group ii libostyle0 1.4devel1-8 Runtime libraries for OpenJade ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-4 The GNU stdc++ library ii sgml-base1.14utilities to maintain the SGML cat --- Received: (at 208042-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:20:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:20:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOyG-00066n-Uv; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 From: Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#208042: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: opensp Source-Version: 1.5.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of opensp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libosp-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/libosp-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libosp5_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/libosp5_1.5.2-1_i386.deb opensp_1.5.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1.diff.gz opensp_1.5.2-1.dsc to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1.dsc opensp_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1_i386.deb opensp_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated opensp
Bug#269719: marked as done (Expansions of UTF-8 filenames break)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:17:20 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269719: fixed in zsh 4.3.0-dev-2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2004 03:51:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 02 20:51:42 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.84]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C3570-b9-00; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:51:42 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.194.252
with login)
by smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2004 03:51:41 -
Received: from darjeeling (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7])
by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206972A9542;
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1C356z-0007Mv-00; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:51:41 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Expansions of UTF-8 filenames break
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:51:41 -0700
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: zsh
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
20:40 joshk bash does this:
20:40 joshk $ ls 0
20:40 joshk 01-L'été Indien.ogg06-Il Faut Naître A
Monaco.ogg
20:40 joshk 02-La Fleur Aux Dents.ogg 07-A Toi.ogg
20:40 joshk oh, another thing, it seems..
20:41 joshk darjeeling:~/music/_albums/x/Joe_Dassin-23_Succ\M-C\M-(s{0}%
20:41 joshk bash:
20:41 joshk darjeeling:~/music/_albums/x/Joe_Dassin-23_Succès{0}$
20:41 joshk anyway, zsh completes this way:
20:41 joshk % ls
20:41 joshk 01-L\'\M-C\M-)t\M-C\M-)\ Indien.ogg
20:41 Clint well, that's definitely a problem
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-rc1
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_US.UTF-8)
Versions of packages zsh depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.34 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcap1 1:1.10-14support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii passwd 1:4.0.3-30 Change and administer password and
-- debconf information excluded
---
Received: (at 269719-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:21:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:21:07 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ErP0K-0006mA-GI; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:17:20 -0800
From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#269719: fixed in zsh 4.3.0-dev-2-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:17:20 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: zsh
Source-Version: 4.3.0-dev-2-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
zsh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
zsh-doc_4.3.0-dev-2-1_all.deb
to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh-doc_4.3.0-dev-2-1_all.deb
zsh-static_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh-static_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb
zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.diff.gz
zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.dsc
to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.dsc
zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb
zsh_4.3.0-dev-2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the
Bug#334676: marked as done (wsola - fails to build)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:18:02 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line wsola - fails to build has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 07:54:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 00:54:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx03.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.13] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ES8mE-0002xp-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:54:23 -0700 Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (vpn0251.extern.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.165.1]) by mx03.uni-tuebingen.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j9J7sKwu004302 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:54:20 +0200 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 201) id D594F18522; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:35:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BF99185EE; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:14:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:14:58 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wsola - fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-7; AVE: 6.32.0.8; VDF: 6.32.0.99; host: mx03) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wsola Version: 4.9-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of wsola_4.9-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] g++ -ffast-math -O4 -lsndfile -lfft -lfftw3 -L/home/flatmax/lib WSOLATest.v4.C -o wsola.v4 WSOLATest.v4.C: In function 'int main(int, char**)': /usr/include/mffm/libSndFileWrapper.H:101: error: too many arguments to function 'int writeNSndFile(SNDFILE*, int, short int*)' WSOLATest.v4.C:166: error: at this point in file make[1]: *** [all] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/wsola-4.9' make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051018-0202 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 334676-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 01:18:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 17:18:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErPx5-fF-Ln for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:18:03 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B78317009; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:18:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:18:02 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: wsola - fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The wsola package has now built successfully on the s390 buildd when given back, as suggested in this bug report. Closing. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDsefKKN6ufymYLloRAgheAJ0Yg1sl7ZBEPAwb+YTanw7O1NXOIwCZARUi 42cNKZTW1AT3yeZ0CQ0swrQ= =zZQ4 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#342371: marked as done (firefox: Flash not working anymore)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:08:05 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342371: firefox: I am having this problem too has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 15:42:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 07 07:42:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from eporroj0-2.customer.nettuno.it ([193.207.175.194] helo=taleggio.e-portaltech.it) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ek1RZ-0001Qf-2i for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:42:57 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.0.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by taleggio.e-portaltech.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C257E3C824E; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:42:24 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ciro Mattia Gonano [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: firefox: Flash not working anymore Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:42:39 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: firefox Version: 1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-2 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Flash plugin fails to load giving Unable to initialize plugin - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (750, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8) Versions of packages firefox depends on: ii debianutils 2.15.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii fontconfig 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcairo21.0.2-3 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidl0 0.8.5-1 library for parsing CORBA IDL file ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-01.8.2-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System multi-head display ii libxp6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System printing extension ii libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc 21.8-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime firefox recommends no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDlwLvcioIad74aSURAoFiAJ9TTWS2qvXS+q1sD/a+AnhyRj+4rQCgjwLW RZfao5q250mxCSBC38lTwr8= =IXpL -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 342371-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 01:08:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 17:08:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailout2.igs.net ([216.58.97.88]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErPnQ-0006f5-9c for [EMAIL
Bug#332513: marked as done (libassa_3.3.2-2 (unstable): fails to build)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:44:09 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332513: libassa_3.3.2-2 (unstable): fails to build has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 21:39:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 14:39:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENdSd-0003eQ-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:39:31 -0700 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B836D18310; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 23:39:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 23:39:22 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libassa_3.3.2-2 (unstable): fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libassa Version: 3.3.2-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of libassa_3.3.2-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -MT IniFile.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/IniFile.Tpo -c IniFile.cpp -o IniFile.o /dev/null 21 if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -MT IPv4Socket.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/IPv4Socket.Tpo -c -o IPv4Socket.lo IPv4Socket.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/IPv4Socket.Tpo .deps/IPv4Socket.Plo; else rm -f .deps/IPv4Socket.Tpo; exit 1; fi g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -MT IPv4Socket.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/IPv4Socket.Tpo -c IPv4Socket.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/IPv4Socket.o IPv4Socket.cpp: In member function 'virtual bool ASSA::IPv4Socket::close()': IPv4Socket.cpp:74: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type IPv4Socket.cpp: In member function 'ASSA::IPv4Socket* ASSA::IPv4Socket::accept()': IPv4Socket.cpp:168: error: invalid conversion from 'size_t*' to 'socklen_t*' IPv4Socket.cpp:168: error: initializing argument 3 of 'int accept(int, sockaddr*, socklen_t*)' make[3]: *** [IPv4Socket.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libassa-3.3.2/assa' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libassa-3.3.2' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libassa-3.3.2' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 Bastian --- Received: (at 332513-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:44:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:44:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailout1.igs.net ([216.58.97.34]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErPQH-0001tl-2A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:44:09 -0800 Received: from nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca (nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca [66.11.161.69]) by mailout1.igs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEB358D8; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:44:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2F5E5CAE77; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:44:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:44:09 -0500 From: Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#332513: libassa_3.3.2-2 (unstable): fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=SLOnmNMLAcnry0J+ Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --SLOnmNMLAcnry0J+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libassa
Bug#139771: marked as done (Request for UTF8 mode)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:17:20 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#139771: fixed in zsh 4.3.0-dev-2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2002 23:03:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 24 17:03:59 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx01.nexgo.de [151.189.8.96] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16pH1q-00065v-00; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:03:58 -0600 Received: from wanderer.jerhard.org (dialin-212-144-173-212.arcor-ip.net [212.144.173.212]) by mx01.nexgo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21B43BC94 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:03:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from jae by wanderer.jerhard.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16oz3r-0002rm-00; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 04:52:51 +0100 From: Jürgen A. Erhard jae/[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xterm has problems with erasing UTF-8 chars X-Reportbug-Version: 1.43 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.43 Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 04:52:51 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xterm Version: 4.1.0-14 Severity: normal I see similar behavior to #132597, but not just in the shell (zsh does have trouble even with latin1), but also when just reading from stdin (in python). When I type some 8bit char, like ö, and then backspace over it, I get the first octet of the two-octet UTF-8 char in the input stream. I use uxterm as per the default config. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux wanderer 2.4.18-wanderer #2 Sun Mar 3 10:16:17 CET 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii debconf 1.0.31 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.0.8-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.1.0-14X Athena widget set library ii xlibs4.1.0-14X Window System client libraries --- Received: (at 139771-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:21:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:21:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErP0K-0006m8-Ex; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:17:20 -0800 From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#139771: fixed in zsh 4.3.0-dev-2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:17:20 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: zsh Source-Version: 4.3.0-dev-2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zsh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: zsh-doc_4.3.0-dev-2-1_all.deb to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh-doc_4.3.0-dev-2-1_all.deb zsh-static_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh-static_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.diff.gz zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.dsc to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1.dsc zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2-1_sparc.deb zsh_4.3.0-dev-2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/z/zsh/zsh_4.3.0-dev-2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated zsh package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:07:14 -0500 Source: zsh
Bug#344909: marked as done (agrep: FTBFS (amd64): CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:47:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344909: fixed in agrep 4.17-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 15:32:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 07:32:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from e176043018.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.176.43.18] helo=kat.ainf.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErGoY-0004ps-2k for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:32:38 -0800 Received: from aj by kat.ainf.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ErGoI-0007GN-GV; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:32:22 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: agrep: FTBFS (amd64): CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:32:22 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: agrep Version: 4.17-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'agrep' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/agrep-4.17' gcc -march=i486 -DMEASURE_TIMES=0 -DAGREP_POINTER=1 -DDOTCOMPRESSED=0 -I. -DUTIME=1 -DISO_CHAR_SET=1 -c -O2 -c -o follow.o follow.c follow.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set follow.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set make[1]: *** [follow.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/agrep-4.17' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 With the attached patch 'agrep' can be compiled on amd64 and other non-i386 architectures. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/agrep-4.17/Makefile ./Makefile --- ../tmp-orig/agrep-4.17/Makefile 2003-10-14 09:58:05.0 + +++ ./Makefile 2005-12-27 15:21:43.0 + @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ ISO_CHAR_SET = 1 # You might have to change this depending on your machine configuration. -CC = gcc -march=i486 +CC = gcc SHELL = /bin/sh --- Received: (at 344909-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:50:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:50:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErPTB-000231-OK; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:47:09 -0800 From: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344909: fixed in agrep 4.17-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:47:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: agrep Source-Version: 4.17-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of agrep, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: agrep_4.17-2.diff.gz to pool/non-free/a/agrep/agrep_4.17-2.diff.gz agrep_4.17-2.dsc to pool/non-free/a/agrep/agrep_4.17-2.dsc agrep_4.17-2_i386.deb to pool/non-free/a/agrep/agrep_4.17-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated agrep package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:01:00 +0100 Source: agrep Binary: agrep Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.17-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: agrep - text search tool with support for approximate patterns Closes: 344909 Changes: agrep (4.17-2) unstable;
Bug#138924: marked as done (openjade: processing of catalogs takes too much time in openjade 1.4devel1-8)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#138924: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2002 16:55:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 18 10:55:05 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (alatau.ankara.gantek.com) [195.175.181.61] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16n0PW-hA-00; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:55:03 -0600 Received: from alatau.ankara.gantek.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by alatau.ankara.gantek.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) with ESMTP id g2IGu3G3004764; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:56:04 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by alatau.ankara.gantek.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) id g2IGu13D004762; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:56:01 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Baurjan Ismagulov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openjade: processing of catalogs takes too much time in openjade 1.4devel1-8 X-Reportbug-Version: 1.43 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.43 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:56:00 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: openjade Version: 1.4devel1-8 Severity: normal Hello, I tried to render the following document: !DOCTYPE book PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN book titledcdc/title /book OpenJade was _very_ slow: time openjade -t tex -d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/docbook.dsl a.sgml real2m32.677s user2m20.800s sys 0m10.330s time jade -t tex -d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/docbook.dsl a.sgml real0m7.461s user0m6.970s sys 0m0.500s I tried to strace OpenJade; the problem is that it reads catalog files thousands of times (an excerpt from strace |sort |uniq -c): 2961 open(/usr/share/sgml/jade/catalog, O_RDONLY) 2924 open(/usr/share/sgml/html/entities/catalog, O_RDONLY) 2924 open(/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/catalog, O_RDONLY) Thanks in advance, Baurjan. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux alatau 2.4.17-686 #2 Sat Dec 22 21:58:49 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages openjade depends on: ii libc62.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libosp2 1.5pre5-5 Runtime library for OpenJade group ii libostyle0 1.4devel1-8 Runtime libraries for OpenJade ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-4 The GNU stdc++ library ii sgml-base1.14utilities to maintain the SGML cat --- Received: (at 138924-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:20:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:20:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOyG-00066j-TM; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 From: Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#138924: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: opensp Source-Version: 1.5.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of opensp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libosp-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/libosp-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libosp5_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/libosp5_1.5.2-1_i386.deb opensp_1.5.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1.diff.gz opensp_1.5.2-1.dsc to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1.dsc opensp_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1_i386.deb opensp_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated opensp
Bug#170795: marked as done (opensp: strange error when parsing an HTML file with onsgmls using stdin)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#170795: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2002 13:47:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 26 07:47:31 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unix03.wehi.edu.au [128.250.252.86] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Gg3m-0003kt-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:47:30 -0600 Received: from localhost (racc13.alpha.wehi.edu.au [192.168.97.213]) by unix03.wehi.EDU.AU (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAQDlPq4026241; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:47:27 +1100 (EST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 150D62F7E0; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:47:21 +1100 (EST) From: Frederic Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opensp: strange error when parsing an HTML file with onsgmls using stdin X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:47:21 +1100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: opensp Version: 1.5release-0.1 Severity: important The file http://www.mathgen.ch/test.html seems to be a valid HTML file (sorry for the inexistant content) -- it is described as such by the W3C validator and nsgmls (package sp) agrees to parse it without problem. When I try to parse it with onsgmls, I get the following results: 1) If I do onsgmls -s test.html, no ouput, as expected; 2) If I do cat test.html | onsgmls -s, the same; 3) but if I do onsgmls -s test.html, I get: onsgmls:OSFD0:73:16:E: end tag for UL omitted, but its declaration does not permit this onsgmls:OSFD0:58:4: start tag was here Is there any reason why this difference should be expected ? The W3C markup validator (http://validator.w3.org) uses onsgmls as described in 3 and doesn't get any error, while the validator installed on my machine yields the same error when using onsgmls, thus making it impossible to validate the page. The opensp package was compiled on the current testing using the source code found on incoming today, but I have exactly the same problem on a Woody system using opensp 1.5pre5-5. Frédéric -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux laptop 2.4.19 #1 Wed Sep 25 13:47:17 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH Versions of packages opensp depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libosp3 1.5release-0.1 Runtime library for OpenJade group ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.21:2.95.4-11The GNU stdc++ library ii sgml-base 1.17 utilities to maintain SGML catalog --- Received: (at 170795-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 00:20:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 27 16:20:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ErOyG-00066l-U8; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 From: Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#170795: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: opensp Source-Version: 1.5.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of opensp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libosp-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/libosp-dev_1.5.2-1_i386.deb libosp5_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/libosp5_1.5.2-1_i386.deb opensp_1.5.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1.diff.gz opensp_1.5.2-1.dsc to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1.dsc opensp_1.5.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2-1_i386.deb opensp_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/opensp/opensp_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have
