Bug#1041441: Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

On 24.09.2023 23:29, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:

On 28.08.2023 21:59, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:

On 23.07.2023 23:21, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:


Hi Peter,

I've uploaded the revision -8 to unstable, which is a prereq for 
having a fix in bookworm. I've uploaded packages for bookworm to here 
[1]. Would be nice if you could patch your system and test them. At 
least your example is solved.


Hilmar

[1] https://freeshell.de/~hille42/1041441/



Ping...

I intend to push the fix to next point release, but I need to make 
sure it solves the issue in question.




Ping.

Hilmar


Ping.

Hilmar


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1041441: Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

On 28.08.2023 21:59, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:

On 23.07.2023 23:21, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:


Hi Peter,

I've uploaded the revision -8 to unstable, which is a prereq for 
having a fix in bookworm. I've uploaded packages for bookworm to here 
[1]. Would be nice if you could patch your system and test them. At 
least your example is solved.


Hilmar

[1] https://freeshell.de/~hille42/1041441/



Ping...

I intend to push the fix to next point release, but I need to make sure 
it solves the issue in question.




Ping.

Hilmar



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1041441: Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

On 23.07.2023 23:21, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:

On 19.07.2023 00:19, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:

Control: clone 1018206 -1
Control: reopen -1


Hi Peter,

Oh my gosh.  Losing formatting would indeed be not severe.  
Distorting contents is IS severe, especially if this goes unnoticed.  
Heaven knows how much text has already been and will be silently 
changed in all the years of Debian 12.  Therefore, a kind request: 
please push it into the next update of Debian (12.1) or at least one 
of the next updates.



Clone this bug to create a fix for bookworm.

I've uploaded the revision -8 to unstable, which is a prereq for having 
a fix in bookworm. I've uploaded packages for bookworm to here [1]. 
Would be nice if you could patch your system and test them. At least 
your example is solved.


Hilmar

[1] https://freeshell.de/~hille42/1041441/

>
Ping...

I intend to push the fix to next point release, but I need to make sure 
it solves the issue in question.


Hilmar


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1041441: Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

On 19.07.2023 00:19, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:

Control: clone 1018206 -1
Control: reopen -1


Hi Peter,

Oh my gosh.  Losing formatting would indeed be not severe.  Distorting 
contents is IS severe, especially if this goes unnoticed.  Heaven 
knows how much text has already been and will be silently changed in 
all the years of Debian 12.  Therefore, a kind request: please push it 
into the next update of Debian (12.1) or at least one of the next 
updates.



Clone this bug to create a fix for bookworm.

I've uploaded the revision -8 to unstable, which is a prereq for having 
a fix in bookworm. I've uploaded packages for bookworm to here [1]. 
Would be nice if you could patch your system and test them. At least 
your example is solved.


Hilmar

[1] https://freeshell.de/~hille42/1041441/
--
testmail


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

Control: clone 1018206 -1
Control: reopen -1

On 06.07.2023 12:15, Peter Mueller wrote:

Hi,

Oh my gosh.  Losing formatting would indeed be not severe.  Distorting 
contents is IS severe, especially if this goes unnoticed.  Heaven knows 
how much text has already been and will be silently changed in all the 
years of Debian 12.  Therefore, a kind request: please push it into the 
next update of Debian (12.1) or at least one of the next updates.



Clone this bug to create a fix for bookworm.

H.
--
sigfault



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

On 07.07.2023 00:05, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:

On 06.07.2023 20:44, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:


Hello,

Oh my gosh.  Losing formatting would indeed be not severe.  
Distorting contents is IS severe, especially if this goes unnoticed.  
Heaven knows how much text has already been and will be silently 
changed in all the years of Debian 12.  Therefore, a kind request: 
please push it into the next update of Debian (12.1) or at least one 
of the next updates.


I guess this is [1] according to [2]. I'll try to do something, but it 
won't be for 12.1, which will be released soon.




I used that one [1], but it does not solve the issue. ;-(


I put patches from ad3b0d706c71bb6f3309a236e98e8fb644121bc6 &
be0377afd9573be47495ac97be42ecc4dae5f0a2 into the repo and it seems to 
solve the issue. Maybe one of the patches is surplus.


As said: the first point release is around the corner, I'll try to push 
the fix to 12.2.


Hilmar



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1018206: Info received (Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used)

[Peter Mueller]

@Hilmar: A typo. I meant: The message sequence [2] in the NTG mailing list is 
correct. I cannot judge about the code [1]. If my memory serves me right, the 
actual change might have happened a few revisions later.  Still, no guarantee. 
So if you can't find the right revision, it's probably safer not to do anything 
despite severe effects.
@Hans: Any idea about which revision or revisions fix 
http://bugs.debian.org/1018206 ?
Peter

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Peter Mueller]

I'd appreciate this. The message [1] in the NTG mailing list is correct. I 
cannot judge about [2].
Gratefully, Peter
06.07.2023, 20:44, Preuße, Hilmar < mailto:hill...@web.de hill...@web.de >
I guess this is [1] according to [2]. I'll try to do something, but it won't be 
for 12.1, which will be released soon. H. [1] 
https://github.com/TeX-Live/luatex/commit/77e10504fec9a0d131af670eadcfe9a0db4e3bf0#diff-06ca41d7c22a6c478aa499841874506676b8f9183cd37c3b928c386d87ffcb4c
 
https://github.com/TeX-Live/luatex/commit/77e10504fec9a0d131af670eadcfe9a0db4e3bf0#diff-06ca41d7c22a6c478aa499841874506676b8f9183cd37c3b928c386d87ffcb4c
 [2] 
https://mailman.ntg.nl/archives/list/dev-lua...@ntg.nl/thread/XVFUXHHDWNVYMVMYYICWMP4CJTQGFLH4
 
https://mailman.ntg.nl/archives/list/dev-lua...@ntg.nl/thread/XVFUXHHDWNVYMVMYYICWMP4CJTQGFLH4
 /

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

On 06.07.2023 20:44, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:

Hi,

Oh my gosh.  Losing formatting would indeed be not severe.  Distorting 
contents is IS severe, especially if this goes unnoticed.  Heaven 
knows how much text has already been and will be silently changed in 
all the years of Debian 12.  Therefore, a kind request: please push it 
into the next update of Debian (12.1) or at least one of the next 
updates.


I guess this is [1] according to [2]. I'll try to do something, but it 
won't be for 12.1, which will be released soon.




I used that one [1], but it does not solve the issue. ;-(

H.

[1 
https://github.com/TeX-Live/luatex/commit/ad3b0d706c71bb6f3309a236e98e8fb644121bc6.patch


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

Control: severity -1 important

On 06.07.2023 12:15, Peter Mueller wrote:

Hi,

Oh my gosh.  Losing formatting would indeed be not severe.  Distorting 
contents is IS severe, especially if this goes unnoticed.  Heaven knows 
how much text has already been and will be silently changed in all the 
years of Debian 12.  Therefore, a kind request: please push it into the 
next update of Debian (12.1) or at least one of the next updates.


I guess this is [1] according to [2]. I'll try to do something, but it 
won't be for 12.1, which will be released soon.


H.

[1] 
https://github.com/TeX-Live/luatex/commit/77e10504fec9a0d131af670eadcfe9a0db4e3bf0#diff-06ca41d7c22a6c478aa499841874506676b8f9183cd37c3b928c386d87ffcb4c
[2] 
https://mailman.ntg.nl/archives/list/dev-lua...@ntg.nl/thread/XVFUXHHDWNVYMVMYYICWMP4CJTQGFLH4/

--
sigfault



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Peter Mueller]

Oh my gosh.  Losing formatting would indeed be not severe.  Distorting contents 
is IS severe, especially if this goes unnoticed.  Heaven knows how much text 
has already been and will be silently changed in all the years of Debian 12.  
Therefore, a kind request: please push it into the next update of Debian (12.1) 
or at least one of the next updates.
Gratefully, Peter

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

On 22.05.2023 21:48, Peter Mueller wrote:

Hi,

I've just tested on my system, and the bug is still present in the 
Debian package with luatex 1.15.0 and indeed fixed in TeXLive 2023 
upstream with luatex 1.17.0.


I assume the issue not severe enough to prepare a fix for bookworm. Fix 
will be in trixie. We are about 14 days before release.


H.
--
--
sigfault



OpenPGP_0x0C871C4C653C1F59.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Peter Mueller]

found 1018206 texlive-binaries/2022.20220321.62855-1
thanks
I've just tested on my system, and the bug is still present in the Debian 
package with luatex 1.15.0 and indeed fixed in TeXLive 2023 upstream with 
luatex 1.17.0.

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Preuße]

Control: reassign -1 texlive-binaries

On 27.08.2022 00:58, Peter Mueller wrote:

 As described in https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/652458

 , luatex loses or changes text
(not formatting!) in particular circumstances.


As far as I understand this is an issue in the luatex binary. So I
change the assigned package.

H.
--
sigfault

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Hilmar Preuße]

Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream

Am 27.08.2022 um 00:58 teilte Peter Mueller mit:


Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2022.20220605-1
Severity: wishlist



As described in https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/652458
https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/652458, luatex loses or changes text
(not formatting!) in particular circumstances.  According to
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/dev-luatex/2022-July/006684.html
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/dev-luatex/2022-July/006684.html,
this seems to be repaired in the revision 7531 in TL 2023 (perhaps a
revision or two later).  I know it's a long stretch, but I'd welcome
it if, for proper testing, the fix finds its way into Debian, ideally
into Debian stable, better sooner than later.


Tagging as fixed in upstream, will be in next TL upstream.

Hilmar
--
sigfault



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1018206: luatex loses or changes text when discretionaries with priorities are used

[Peter Mueller]

Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2022.20220605-1
Severity: wishlist
As described in https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/652458 
https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/652458, luatex loses or changes text (not 
formatting!) in particular circumstances.  According to 
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/dev-luatex/2022-July/006684.html 
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/dev-luatex/2022-July/006684.html, this seems 
to be repaired in the revision 7531 in TL 2023 (perhaps a revision or two 
later).  I know it's a long stretch, but I'd welcome it if, for proper testing, 
the fix finds its way into Debian, ideally into Debian stable, better sooner 
than later.
Thanks in advance,
Peter