Bug#1063403: libeegdev-dev,libeegdev0t64: both ship /usr/share/doc/libeegdev0/changelog.gz
Comtrol: tags -1 patch On 2024-02-07 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: libeegdev-dev,libeegdev0t64 [...] > Something weird happened after the package rename: > /usr/share/doc/libeegdev0/changelog.Debian.gz > /usr/share/doc/libeegdev0/changelog.gz > Are now shipped by libeegdev-dev and libeegdev0t64 while they should be > in none of these packages. [...] > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) > > Depends: {+libeegdev0t64 (= 0.2-8.1~exp1),+} libeegdev0 (= [-0.2-8)-] > {+0.2-8.1~exp1)+} > Installed-Size: [-71-] {+87+} > Version: [-0.2-8-] {+0.2-8.1~exp1+} > Also the libeegdev0 dependency is still there ... Hello, This is another instance (well, the second one ;-) ) of not changing the dh_installdocs --link-doc= argument in debian/rules. dh_installdocs also generates the dependency. -dh_installdocs --link-doc=libeegdev0 +dh_installdocs --link-doc=libeegdev0t64 cu Andreas
Bug#1063403: libeegdev-dev,libeegdev0t64: both ship /usr/share/doc/libeegdev0/changelog.gz
Package: libeegdev-dev,libeegdev0t64 Version: 0.2-8.1~exp1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t X-Debbugs-Cc: Michael Hudson-Doyle Something weird happened after the package rename: /usr/share/doc/libeegdev0/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/libeegdev0/changelog.gz Are now shipped by libeegdev-dev and libeegdev0t64 while they should be in none of these packages. $ debdiff libeegdev-dev_0.2-8_amd64.deb libeegdev-dev_0.2-8.1~exp1_amd64.deb [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have different names, permissions or owners.] Files in second .deb but not in first - -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/libeegdev0/changelog.Debian.gz -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/libeegdev0/changelog.gz Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) Depends: {+libeegdev0t64 (= 0.2-8.1~exp1),+} libeegdev0 (= [-0.2-8)-] {+0.2-8.1~exp1)+} Installed-Size: [-71-] {+87+} Version: [-0.2-8-] {+0.2-8.1~exp1+} Also the libeegdev0 dependency is still there ... Andreas