[ CC'ing Daniel Glassey as co-maintainer ]
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:45:43AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:07:33PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I can temporariky use internal clucene, but that gives problems on arm*,
so I would like to avoid that...
Actually the problems on arm seems to be gone so I can do
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b26be8c9226832141c7fdcc337c395c8ac09d80;hp=48aeda3b4eefd295a37d4bf49f2344390006bf95
and thus I can do
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=commitdiff;h=202e24523462f4603690e9005bd06f97c795310d;hp=3b26be8c9226832141c7fdcc337c395c8ac09d80
but I would prefer to have this embeeded code copy uses as short
as possible...
Now even some months later: is there any progress? And be it a
upload with a new source package? (As binary packages differ anyway?)
That wouldn't break r-deps but cause LO to be sanely built.
I don't really want an other
external (3.6.x upto 4.0.x in experimental) - internal (4.0.x in sid)
- external (4.1.x in experimental, _right now_)
- internal (4.1.x in unstable)
game
The last real answer was in May:
#debian-devel.05-06.log:18:03 _rene_ fabo: ping? :)
#debian-devel.05-06.log:21:21 -!- fabo_
[~f...@a91-152-78-194.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #debian-devel
#debian-devel.05-06.log:21:26 -!- fabo
[~f...@a91-152-78-194.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
#debian-devel.05-07.log:15:42 -!- fabo_ is now known as fabo
#debian-devel.05-07.log:15:42 _rene_ fabo: ping? (sorry for nagging, but a
simple answer would be nice)
#debian-devel.05-07.log:15:44 fabo _rene_: sorry, I'm on vacation :) I tried
to be away form the screen...
#debian-devel.05-07.log:15:44 _rene_ fabo: mmh, ok :)
#debian-devel.05-07.log:15:45 _rene_ fabo: you know what I am aiming at,
though? :)
#debian-devel.05-07.log:15:45 fabo _rene_: yes :) I'll get it done this week
#debian-devel.05-07.log:15:45 _rene_ fabo: the upload on Thursday (already
built) will use internal clucence, but that's only ... cool :)
#debian-devel.05-07.log:15:46 _rene_ fabo: new source package I assume? or
proper transition? (not that it matters much except NEW, but..)
#debian-devel.05-07.log:15:56 fabo _rene_: dunno yet. not sure all reverse
build-dep can switch to the new lib. need to check.
Or should I just NMU it (as a new source package) into unstable?
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
