Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
Hi, On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:18:29PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 18.06.14 Brice Goglin (brice.gog...@ens-lyon.org) wrote: BIBINPUTS is honored but it doesn't understand things like .:foo/bar: for prepending . and foo/bar to the default path (just like TEXINPUTS is documented in tex(1)) as bibtex does. Sebastian: would you be so kind to have a look at this? I attached a new patch. It's still not perfect, since it does not read the default BIBINPUTS from texmf.cnf, but it should be good enough (rubber also ignores the default TEXINPUTS from texmf.cnf). -- Sebastian --- biblatex.py 2014-04-02 13:59:08.0 +0200 +++ biblatex.py.new 2014-06-24 16:25:37.440292985 +0200 @@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ basic BibLaTeX support for Rubber -from os.path import exists, getmtime +import sys +from os import getenv +from os.path import join, exists, getmtime from rubber.util import parse_keyval, md5_file from rubber import _, msg from string import split @@ -50,7 +52,16 @@ if 'location' in options and options['location'] == 'remote': return -doc.add_source(file) +# BIBINPUTS support with fallback to current working directory +bibinputs = getenv(BIBINPUTS, .) +for bibpath in bibinputs.split(:): +bibfile = join(bibpath, file) +if exists(bibfile): +doc.add_source(bibfile) +return + +msg.error(_(cannot find %s) % file) +sys.exit(2) def hook_bibliography (loc, files): for bib in split(files, ,): signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
On 24.06.14 Sebastian Reichel (s...@debian.org) wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:18:29PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 18.06.14 Brice Goglin (brice.gog...@ens-lyon.org) wrote: Hi, BIBINPUTS is honored but it doesn't understand things like .:foo/bar: for prepending . and foo/bar to the default path (just like TEXINPUTS is documented in tex(1)) as bibtex does. Sebastian: would you be so kind to have a look at this? I attached a new patch. It's still not perfect, since it does not read the default BIBINPUTS from texmf.cnf, but it should be good enough (rubber also ignores the default TEXINPUTS from texmf.cnf). Many thanks! Brice: new package on https://freeshell.de/~hille42/rubber/ . If that is OK for your, I'll upload. Hilmar -- sigmentation fault signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
Le 24/06/2014 20:43, Hilmar Preusse a écrit : BIBINPUTS is honored but it doesn't understand things like .:foo/bar: for prepending . and foo/bar to the default path (just like TEXINPUTS is documented in tex(1)) as bibtex does. Sebastian: would you be so kind to have a look at this? I attached a new patch. It's still not perfect, since it does not read the default BIBINPUTS from texmf.cnf, but it should be good enough (rubber also ignores the default TEXINPUTS from texmf.cnf). Many thanks! Brice: new package on https://freeshell.de/~hille42/rubber/ . If that is OK for your, I'll upload. Looks like it works, thanks. By the way, I see messages like hdr.tex: [biblatex] Please rerun LaTeX. (page 108) Isn't rubber supposed to automatically rebuild in this case? thanks Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
On 24.06.14 Brice Goglin (brice.gog...@ens-lyon.org) wrote: Hi, By the way, I see messages like hdr.tex: [biblatex] Please rerun LaTeX. (page 108) Isn't rubber supposed to automatically rebuild in this case? Is this new in 1.1+20100306-4, did it work befor?. Could you open a new ticket for this? Thanks, Hilmar -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
Le 24/06/2014 23:00, Hilmar Preusse a écrit : On 24.06.14 Brice Goglin (brice.gog...@ens-lyon.org) wrote: Hi, By the way, I see messages like hdr.tex: [biblatex] Please rerun LaTeX. (page 108) Isn't rubber supposed to automatically rebuild in this case? Is this new in 1.1+20100306-4, did it work befor?. Could you open a new ticket for this? Thanks, Hilmar It was hardly testable earlier since my biblatex testcases didn't work well. I'll open a new BR after your upload. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:02:55PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: Le 24/06/2014 20:43, Hilmar Preusse a écrit : BIBINPUTS is honored but it doesn't understand things like .:foo/bar: for prepending . and foo/bar to the default path (just like TEXINPUTS is documented in tex(1)) as bibtex does. Sebastian: would you be so kind to have a look at this? I attached a new patch. It's still not perfect, since it does not read the default BIBINPUTS from texmf.cnf, but it should be good enough (rubber also ignores the default TEXINPUTS from texmf.cnf). Many thanks! Brice: new package on https://freeshell.de/~hille42/rubber/ . If that is OK for your, I'll upload. Looks like it works, thanks. By the way, I see messages like hdr.tex: [biblatex] Please rerun LaTeX. (page 108) Isn't rubber supposed to automatically rebuild in this case? It should be enough to call rubber once on a document. I can't tell you what's wrong without example code, though ;) -- Sebastian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
On 18.06.14 Brice Goglin (brice.gog...@ens-lyon.org) wrote: Hi, BIBINPUTS is honored but it doesn't understand things like .:foo/bar: for prepending . and foo/bar to the default path (just like TEXINPUTS is documented in tex(1)) as bibtex does. Thanks. Sebastian: would you be so kind to have a look at this? Regards, Hilmar -- sigmentation fault signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
On 16.06.14 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: Hi, Brice: paackage w/ patch is on http://home.amasol.de/~preusse/rubber/ Could you test? Moved to https://freeshell.de/~hille42/rubber/ Hilmar -- sigmentation fault signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
Le 17/06/2014 11:36, Hilmar Preusse a écrit : On 16.06.14 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: Hi, Brice: paackage w/ patch is on http://home.amasol.de/~preusse/rubber/ Could you test? Moved to https://freeshell.de/~hille42/rubber/ Hello, BIBINPUTS is honored but it doesn't understand things like .:foo/bar: for prepending . and foo/bar to the default path (just like TEXINPUTS is documented in tex(1)) as bibtex does. And my onchance bcf custom rule doesn't seem required anymore, indeed. Thanks Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
On 14.06.14 Sebastian Reichel (s...@debian.org) wrote: Hi, Sorry for the delay. I did not bother to reply before having a patch. Fine with me. Brice: paackage w/ patch is on http://home.amasol.de/~preusse/rubber/ Could you test? Thanks, Hilmar -- sigmentation fault signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
Hi Sorry for the delay. I did not bother to reply before having a patch. On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 03:53:37PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:24:26PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:59:06PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: In https://bugs.debian.org/743362 you requested me to include the provided biblatex module. I've included it and got now a bug report telling me that BIBINPUTS and the bibtex.path variable is ignored now. I told the submitter to remove your module and he reported that it solved the problem. Please be so kind to provide a new module fixing this regression. BIBINPUTS is not used by biber(1p), which is called instead of bibtex(1) for latex documents using biblatex. My biber (from Debian package 1.8-1) uses BIBINPUTS. I get this output when just asking for biblio.bib INFO - Found BibTeX data source 'foo/biblio.bib' Yes, biber supports it. It's just not in the manpage, which I used for reference (bibtex manpage references the env variable). I guess, that Brice's document tries to use biblatex and bibtex at the same time. I don't understand what this means :) Ignore it, that was not the problem :) This may have worked without the plugin, since all biblatex stuff was ignored, but fails once both packages are analyzed. Brice, can you create a minimal example triggering your problem, or at least sent the bib* related lines from your LaTeX files? Here's a tarball containing a .tex and a .bib in the foo subdirectory. This command from inside the extracted tarball BIBINPUTS=foo rubber -v -d bar works when your biblatex.py is not installed, but it fails when it's installed: 'biblio.bib' does not exist There were errors compiling bar. That's because biblatex.py does proper dependency tracking of your bib files (so it will rebuild your pdf if only the bib file has changed). It did not interpret the BIBINPUTS variable, though. I have attached a patch, which should add simple support for the variable (your example works with it). Note my latex file forces rubber to rerun biber when the bcf changed. Otherwise, I have to run rubber, run biber, and rerun rubber with -f. That may be related, but removing these rules doesn't solve the issue. That rule is no longer needed with working biblatex.py ;) -- Sebastian --- biblatex.py.orig 2014-04-02 13:59:08.0 +0200 +++ biblatex.py 2014-06-14 18:31:22.940527047 +0200 @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ basic BibLaTeX support for Rubber -from os.path import exists, getmtime +from os import getenv +from os.path import join, exists, getmtime from rubber.util import parse_keyval, md5_file from rubber import _, msg from string import split @@ -50,6 +51,11 @@ if 'location' in options and options['location'] == 'remote': return +# support BIBINPUTS variable +bibinputs = getenv(BIBINPUTS) +if bibinputs != None: +file = join(bibinputs, file) + doc.add_source(file) def hook_bibliography (loc, files): signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:24:26PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: Hi Hilmar and Brice, On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:59:06PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: In https://bugs.debian.org/743362 you requested me to include the provided biblatex module. I've included it and got now a bug report telling me that BIBINPUTS and the bibtex.path variable is ignored now. I told the submitter to remove your module and he reported that it solved the problem. Please be so kind to provide a new module fixing this regression. BIBINPUTS is not used by biber(1p), which is called instead of bibtex(1) for latex documents using biblatex. My biber (from Debian package 1.8-1) uses BIBINPUTS. I get this output when just asking for biblio.bib INFO - Found BibTeX data source 'foo/biblio.bib' I guess, that Brice's document tries to use biblatex and bibtex at the same time. I don't understand what this means :) This may have worked without the plugin, since all biblatex stuff was ignored, but fails once both packages are analyzed. Brice, can you create a minimal example triggering your problem, or at least sent the bib* related lines from your LaTeX files? Here's a tarball containing a .tex and a .bib in the foo subdirectory. This command from inside the extracted tarball BIBINPUTS=foo rubber -v -d bar works when your biblatex.py is not installed, but it fails when it's installed: 'biblio.bib' does not exist There were errors compiling bar. Note my latex file forces rubber to rerun biber when the bcf changed. Otherwise, I have to run rubber, run biber, and rerun rubber with -f. That may be related, but removing these rules doesn't solve the issue. Regards Brice bib.tar.bz2 Description: Binary data
Bug#749699: (fwd) Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
Dear Sebastian, In https://bugs.debian.org/743362 you requested me to include the provided biblatex module. I've included it and got now a bug report telling me that BIBINPUTS and the bibtex.path variable is ignored now. I told the submitter to remove your module and he reported that it solved the problem. Please be so kind to provide a new module fixing this regression. Regards, Hilmar - Forwarded message from Brice Goglin bgog...@debian.org - Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 10:39:08 +0200 From: Brice Goglin bgog...@debian.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore Reply-To: Brice Goglin bgog...@debian.org, 749...@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: 20140529083908.1855.22619.report...@maiantheme.bordeaux.inria.fr X-Mailer: reportbug 6.5.0 Package: rubber Version: 1.1+20100306-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The BIBINPUTS variable is not honored anymore when building with rubber. The bug was introduced in -3 I tried the rubber bibtex.path variable instead, doesn't work either (see bug #694265). Brice - End forwarded message - -- http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/#206401 http://counter.li.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
Hi Hilmar and Brice, On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:59:06PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: In https://bugs.debian.org/743362 you requested me to include the provided biblatex module. I've included it and got now a bug report telling me that BIBINPUTS and the bibtex.path variable is ignored now. I told the submitter to remove your module and he reported that it solved the problem. Please be so kind to provide a new module fixing this regression. BIBINPUTS is not used by biber(1p), which is called instead of bibtex(1) for latex documents using biblatex. I guess, that Brice's document tries to use biblatex and bibtex at the same time. This may have worked without the plugin, since all biblatex stuff was ignored, but fails once both packages are analyzed. Brice, can you create a minimal example triggering your problem, or at least sent the bib* related lines from your LaTeX files? I will try to see if my guess is right and will try to update rubber, so that it handles that corner case more gracefully. If necessary by throwing a proper error message. -- Sebastian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
Package: rubber Version: 1.1+20100306-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The BIBINPUTS variable is not honored anymore when building with rubber. The bug was introduced in -3 I tried the rubber bibtex.path variable instead, doesn't work either (see bug #694265). Brice -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages rubber depends on: ii python 2.7.6-2 ii python-support 1.0.15 ii texlive-latex-base 2013.20140408-1 rubber recommends no packages. Versions of packages rubber suggests: ii imagemagick 8:6.7.7.10+dfsg-1 pn sam2pnone ii transfig 1:3.2.5.e-3 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
The BIBINPUTS variable is not honored anymore when building with rubber. The bug was introduced in -3 Oops typo. It was introduced in -4. -3 looks OK. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
On 29.05.14 Brice Goglin (bgog...@debian.org) wrote: Hi, The BIBINPUTS variable is not honored anymore when building with rubber. The bug was introduced in -4 I tried the rubber bibtex.path variable instead, doesn't work either (see bug #694265). rubber (1.1+20100306-4) unstable; urgency=medium * fix a typo in multibib.py (Closes: #683523) * replace broken xelatex module (Closes: #725356) * support for scanning dependencies of ltxtable (Closes: #694836) * support for glossaries package (Closes: #694839) * basic support for biblatex (Closes: #743362) -- Hilmar Preuße hill...@web.de Sun, 30 Mar 2014 22:48:50 +0200 I'd guess that the latest change introduced the problem. A file biblatex.py was added. Could you remove/rename the following files on your system and report if that helps? /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/rubber/latex_modules/biblatex.py /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/rubber/latex_modules/biblatex.pyc /usr/share/pyshared/rubber/latex_modules/biblatex.py Thanks! Hilmar -- sigmentation fault signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749699: rubber: BIBINPUTS not honored anymore
Le 29/05/2014 22:21, Hilmar Preusse a écrit : I'd guess that the latest change introduced the problem. A file biblatex.py was added. Could you remove/rename the following files on your system and report if that helps? /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/rubber/latex_modules/biblatex.py /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/rubber/latex_modules/biblatex.pyc /usr/share/pyshared/rubber/latex_modules/biblatex.py Seems to fix the problem ! Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
