Bug#754809: bugs.debian.org still broken regarding DKIM

2019-03-10 Thread Don Armstrong 
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 11, Matija Nalis  wrote:
> 
> > Has this issue ever has been dealt with for bugs.debian.org (as it
> > seems to have been solved for lists.debian.org in forked #752084) ?
> No: it is obvious that the messages relayed by the BTS are still 
> modified.

Right; the only way forward for this is to completely stop rewriting the
subject of messages sent to submit@ or nnn@ or implement resending.

> > I can provide whole forensic report if required, or do tests.
> The problem is quite clear, but the is no commitment from the BTS 
> maintainers to choose a solution and maybe implement it.

I don't have time to implement either in the near term.

My current longer term plan is to switch to resending messages and
rewriting From.

-- 
Don Armstrong  https://www.donarmstrong.com

The game of science is, in principle, without end. He who decides one
day that scientific statements do not call for any further test, and
that they can be regarded as finally verified, retires from the game.
 -- Sir Karl Popper _The Logic of Scientific Discovery_ ยง11

Bug#754809: bugs.debian.org still broken regarding DKIM

2019-03-10 Thread Marco d'Itri 
On Mar 11, Matija Nalis  wrote:

> Has this issue ever has been dealt with for bugs.debian.org (as it
> seems to have been solved for lists.debian.org in forked #752084) ?
No: it is obvious that the messages relayed by the BTS are still 
modified.

> I can provide whole forensic report if required, or do tests.
The problem is quite clear, but the is no commitment from the BTS 
maintainers to choose a solution and maybe implement it.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#754809: bugs.debian.org still broken regarding DKIM

2019-03-10 Thread Matija Nalis 
Has this issue ever has been dealt with for bugs.debian.org (as it
seems to have been solved for lists.debian.org in forked #752084) ?

Because I still have breakage when I submit mail to bugs.debian.org
and I get failure notices from other hosts as noted in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830865#45

(note: my DKIM validates elsewhere, and I do not have any other issues
with it except on bugs.debian.org mails). Forensic headers (requested
in DMARC with fo=1) seems to indicate DKIM breaks along the way near
bendel.debian.org, for example:

Authentication-Results: mail.susi-moog.de;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; 
unprotected) header.d=voyager.hr header.i=@voyager.hr header.b="EVrAhWxo";
dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: mail.susi-moog.de; spf=none (mailfrom) 
smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org (client-ip=82.195.75.100; 
helo=bendel.debian.org; 
envelope-from=bounce-debian-bugs-rc=andreas.moog=warperbbs...@lists.debian.org; 
receiver=)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id ABCCC20BAE; Wed,  6 Mar 2019 03:15:08 + (UTC)
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org  Wed Mar  6 
03:15:08 2019
Old-Return-Path: 
X-Original-To: lists-debian-bugs...@bendel.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-bugs...@bendel.debian.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF7820BA9
for ; Wed,  6 Mar 2019 03:15:08 
+ (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank bug
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.999 tagged_above=-1 required=5.3
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3]
autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with ESMTP id r-35XNxN_7Md
for ;
Wed,  6 Mar 2019 03:15:06 + (UTC)
Received: from buxtehude.debian.org (buxtehude.debian.org 
[IPv6:2607:f8f0:614:1::1274:39])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "buxtehude.debian.org", Issuer "Debian SMTP CA" (not 
verified))
by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D1B20BA4;
Wed,  6 Mar 2019 03:15:06 + (UTC)
Received: from debbugs by buxtehude.debian.org with local (Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from )
id 1h1N1L-0008UD-2y; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 03:15:03 +
X-Loop: ow...@bugs.debian.org


I can provide whole forensic report if required, or do tests.

-- 
Opinions above are GNU-copylefted.