Bug#919747: gnome-keysign: please package gnome-keysign 1.0.0
Hi Ludovico, [...] > I was able to reproduce the error that you faced. > The wormhole test didn't import the required key, so it failed if the > testing private key wasn't already in the keyring. I see. > I wrote a fix [1] and very soon (probably even tomorrow) we should > release a hotfix release 1.0.1 of gnome-keysign. Excellent, thanks! Looking forward to the new release, which will make its way into the packaging soon :) Cheers Sascha > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:53:28 +0100 Sascha Steinbiss wrote: >> tags 919747 help >> thanks >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> as you may not have noticed, I have prepared packaging for 1.0.0 in the >> gnome-keysign repo on Salsa [1]. It took some work because I had to >> switch everything to Python 3 due to dependency requirements (some >> Python modules newly required in 1.0.0 are only available for Python 3, >> and one even had to be vendored...). >> >> However, some tests in the Magic Wormhole functionality are still >> failing (see attachment) and I am struggling to find the free time to >> dig deeper into this issue. It might well be something trivial that just >> escapes my intuition right now -- if you can spot anything I'd be happy >> to pick up the trail. >> >> I'm tagging this as "help" and also cc'd this to upstream to get things >> moving ;) >> Tobias, is this something you've seen before? >> >> Cheers >> Sascha >> >> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnome-keysign >> >> On 1/19/19 6:22 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>> Package: gnome-keysign >>> Version: 0.9.8-1 >>> Severity: wishlist >>> >>> gnome-keysign 1.0.0 was released by upstream 11 days ago: >>> >>> https://github.com/gnome-keysign/gnome-keysign/releases/tag/1.0.0 >>> >>> It would be great if we could have it in debian! >>> >>> thanks for maintaining gnome-keysign, >>> >>>--dkg >>> >>> -- System Information: >>> Debian Release: buster/sid >>> APT prefers testing-debug >>> APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (200, >>> 'unstable-debug'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, >>> 'experimental') >>> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) >>> Foreign Architectures: i386 >>> >>> Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) >>> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), >>> LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) >>> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash >>> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) >>> >>> Versions of packages gnome-keysign depends on: >>> ii avahi-daemon 0.7-4+b1 >>> ii gir1.2-glib-2.0 1.58.3-2 >>> ii gir1.2-gst-plugins-base-1.0 1.14.4-1 >>> ii gir1.2-gstreamer-1.0 1.14.4-1 >>> ii gir1.2-gtk-3.0 3.24.2-3 >>> ii gstreamer1.0-gtk31.14.4-1
Bug#919747: gnome-keysign: please package gnome-keysign 1.0.0
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 19:08:25 -0500 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2019-01-19 18:53:28 +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > as you may not have noticed, I have prepared packaging for 1.0.0 in the > > gnome-keysign repo on Salsa [1]. It took some work because I had to > > switch everything to Python 3 due to dependency requirements (some > > Python modules newly required in 1.0.0 are only available for Python 3, > > and one even had to be vendored...). > > I understand that it's a lot of work, but I'm very happy to see the move > to python3 -- thank you for doing that! > > I'm assuming that "vendored" means "bundled with the gnome-keysign, > rather than shipped as an independent python3 module". > > I didn't realize that any modules needed to be vendored though -- that > sounds like not a great outcome for debian. Do you have more details > written down someplace about which module it is, and why vendoring is > necessary? > > all the best, > > --dkg Hi Daniel, the vendored module is python3-avahi. You can read more about it here [1]. This is the related Debian open bug report [2]. Cheers, Ludovico de Nittis [1] https://github.com/gnome-keysign/gnome-keysign/pull/65 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853239
Bug#919747: gnome-keysign: please package gnome-keysign 1.0.0
On Sat 2019-01-19 18:53:28 +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > as you may not have noticed, I have prepared packaging for 1.0.0 in the > gnome-keysign repo on Salsa [1]. It took some work because I had to > switch everything to Python 3 due to dependency requirements (some > Python modules newly required in 1.0.0 are only available for Python 3, > and one even had to be vendored...). I understand that it's a lot of work, but I'm very happy to see the move to python3 -- thank you for doing that! I'm assuming that "vendored" means "bundled with the gnome-keysign, rather than shipped as an independent python3 module". I didn't realize that any modules needed to be vendored though -- that sounds like not a great outcome for debian. Do you have more details written down someplace about which module it is, and why vendoring is necessary? all the best, --dkg signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#919747: gnome-keysign: please package gnome-keysign 1.0.0
Hi Sascha, I was able to reproduce the error that you faced. The wormhole test didn't import the required key, so it failed if the testing private key wasn't already in the keyring. I wrote a fix [1] and very soon (probably even tomorrow) we should release a hotfix release 1.0.1 of gnome-keysign. Thank you for your time. Cheers, Ludovico de Nittis [1] https://github.com/gnome-keysign/gnome-keysign/pull/72 On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:53:28 +0100 Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > tags 919747 help > thanks > > Hi Daniel, > > as you may not have noticed, I have prepared packaging for 1.0.0 in the > gnome-keysign repo on Salsa [1]. It took some work because I had to > switch everything to Python 3 due to dependency requirements (some > Python modules newly required in 1.0.0 are only available for Python 3, > and one even had to be vendored...). > > However, some tests in the Magic Wormhole functionality are still > failing (see attachment) and I am struggling to find the free time to > dig deeper into this issue. It might well be something trivial that just > escapes my intuition right now -- if you can spot anything I'd be happy > to pick up the trail. > > I'm tagging this as "help" and also cc'd this to upstream to get things > moving ;) > Tobias, is this something you've seen before? > > Cheers > Sascha > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnome-keysign > > On 1/19/19 6:22 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > Package: gnome-keysign > > Version: 0.9.8-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > gnome-keysign 1.0.0 was released by upstream 11 days ago: > > > > https://github.com/gnome-keysign/gnome-keysign/releases/tag/1.0.0 > > > > It would be great if we could have it in debian! > > > > thanks for maintaining gnome-keysign, > > > >--dkg > > > > -- System Information: > > Debian Release: buster/sid > > APT prefers testing-debug > > APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (200, > > 'unstable-debug'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, > > 'experimental') > > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > > > Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > > LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > > > > Versions of packages gnome-keysign depends on: > > ii avahi-daemon 0.7-4+b1 > > ii gir1.2-glib-2.0 1.58.3-2 > > ii gir1.2-gst-plugins-base-1.0 1.14.4-1 > > ii gir1.2-gstreamer-1.0 1.14.4-1 > > ii gir1.2-gtk-3.0 3.24.2-3 > > ii gstreamer1.0-gtk31.14.4-1
Bug#919747: gnome-keysign: please package gnome-keysign 1.0.0
Hi, seems to be our fault. We're on it and hopefully tag a 1.0.1 very soon. Thanks for the report!
Bug#919747: gnome-keysign: please package gnome-keysign 1.0.0
tags 919747 help thanks Hi Daniel, as you may not have noticed, I have prepared packaging for 1.0.0 in the gnome-keysign repo on Salsa [1]. It took some work because I had to switch everything to Python 3 due to dependency requirements (some Python modules newly required in 1.0.0 are only available for Python 3, and one even had to be vendored...). However, some tests in the Magic Wormhole functionality are still failing (see attachment) and I am struggling to find the free time to dig deeper into this issue. It might well be something trivial that just escapes my intuition right now -- if you can spot anything I'd be happy to pick up the trail. I'm tagging this as "help" and also cc'd this to upstream to get things moving ;) Tobias, is this something you've seen before? Cheers Sascha [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnome-keysign On 1/19/19 6:22 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: gnome-keysign > Version: 0.9.8-1 > Severity: wishlist > > gnome-keysign 1.0.0 was released by upstream 11 days ago: > > https://github.com/gnome-keysign/gnome-keysign/releases/tag/1.0.0 > > It would be great if we could have it in debian! > > thanks for maintaining gnome-keysign, > >--dkg > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: buster/sid > APT prefers testing-debug > APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (200, > 'unstable-debug'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, > 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > > Versions of packages gnome-keysign depends on: > ii avahi-daemon 0.7-4+b1 > ii gir1.2-glib-2.0 1.58.3-2 > ii gir1.2-gst-plugins-base-1.0 1.14.4-1 > ii gir1.2-gstreamer-1.0 1.14.4-1 > ii gir1.2-gtk-3.0 3.24.2-3 > ii gstreamer1.0-gtk31.14.4-1 > ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad 1.14.4-1+b1 > ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-good1.14.4-1 > ii gstreamer1.0-x 1.14.4-1 > ii python 2.7.15-3 > ii python-avahi 0.7-4+b1 > ii python-cairo 1.16.2-1+b1 > ii python-dbus 1.2.8-2+b3 > ii python-gi3.30.4-1 > ii python-gi-cairo 3.30.4-1 > ii python-gpg 1.12.0-4 > ii python-qrcode6.0-1 > ii python-requests 2.20.0-2 > ii python-twisted-core 18.9.0-3 > > gnome-keysign recommends no packages. > > gnome-keysign suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > == ERROR: test_wormhole.test_offer_cancel -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nose/case.py", line 197, in runTest self.test(*self.arg) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nose/twistedtools.py", line 169, in wrapper raise exc_type(exc_value).with_traceback(tb) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nose/twistedtools.py", line 143, in errback failure.raiseException() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 467, in raiseException raise self.value.with_traceback(self.tb) ValueError: No data to export for A2ECF6A72BCFD74F4165B389034094FB8FD495FB (in None) >> begin captured logging << keysign.gpgmeh: DEBUG: Import Result: ImportResult(considered=1, imported=1, imported_rsa=0, imports=[ImportStatus(fpr='A2ECF6A72BCFD74F4165B389034094FB8FD495FB', result=0, status=1), ImportStatus(fpr='A2ECF6A72BCFD74F4165B389034094FB8FD495FB', result=0, status=17)], new_revocations=0, new_signatures=0, new_sub_keys=0, new_user_ids=0, no_user_id=0, not_imported=0, secret_imported=1, secret_read=1, secret_unchanged=0, skipped_new_keys=0, skipped_v3_keys=0, unchanged=0) keysign.gpgkey: DEBUG: UID from gpgme: 'Another Test ' keysign.gpgkey: DEBUG: UID from gpgme: 'Test Key ' test_wormhole: INFO: Running with key Key(expiry=None, fingerprint='A2ECF6A72BCFD74F4165B389034094FB8FD495FB', uidslist=[UID(expiry=None, uid='Another Test ', name='Another Test', comment='', email='second@uid'), UID(expiry=None, uid='Test Key ', name='Test Key', comment='', email='t...@test.test')]) keysign.gpgmeh: DEBUG: Exported 'A2ECF6A72BCFD74F4165B389034094FB8FD495FB': b'' - >> end captured logging << - == ERROR: test_wormhole.test_wrmhl -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nose/case.py", line 197, in runTest self.test(*self.arg) File
Bug#919747: gnome-keysign: please package gnome-keysign 1.0.0
Package: gnome-keysign Version: 0.9.8-1 Severity: wishlist gnome-keysign 1.0.0 was released by upstream 11 days ago: https://github.com/gnome-keysign/gnome-keysign/releases/tag/1.0.0 It would be great if we could have it in debian! thanks for maintaining gnome-keysign, --dkg -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing-debug APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable-debug'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages gnome-keysign depends on: ii avahi-daemon 0.7-4+b1 ii gir1.2-glib-2.0 1.58.3-2 ii gir1.2-gst-plugins-base-1.0 1.14.4-1 ii gir1.2-gstreamer-1.0 1.14.4-1 ii gir1.2-gtk-3.0 3.24.2-3 ii gstreamer1.0-gtk31.14.4-1 ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad 1.14.4-1+b1 ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-good1.14.4-1 ii gstreamer1.0-x 1.14.4-1 ii python 2.7.15-3 ii python-avahi 0.7-4+b1 ii python-cairo 1.16.2-1+b1 ii python-dbus 1.2.8-2+b3 ii python-gi3.30.4-1 ii python-gi-cairo 3.30.4-1 ii python-gpg 1.12.0-4 ii python-qrcode6.0-1 ii python-requests 2.20.0-2 ii python-twisted-core 18.9.0-3 gnome-keysign recommends no packages. gnome-keysign suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
